DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 APPENDIX 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 2A: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION ...................................................... 1 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................. 1 1.4. Overview of Engagement Methodology ................................................................................... 2 2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS TO DATE ....................................................................... 3 2.1. Non‐Government Stakeholder List and Study Database ........................................................... 3 2.2. Electrification Study Website .................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Stakeholder Workshop # 1 ........................................................................................................ 4 2.4. Metrolinx Planning and Transportation Leaders Forum ........................................................... 4 2.5. GO Transit Customer Service Advisory Committee Meeting ..................................................... 4 2.6. Update Meeting (Georgetown Corridor) ................................................................................... 4 2.7. Municipal Transit Leaders Briefing ........................................................................................... 4 2.8. Government Agency Consultations ........................................................................................... 4 2.9. Stakeholder Workshop # 2 ........................................................................................................ 5 2.10. Community Advisory Committee Update Meeting ............................................................... 5 2.11. Stakeholder Workshop #3 ..................................................................................................... 5 2.13. Community Advisory Committee Update Meeting ............................................................... 5 2.14. Stakeholder Workshop #4 ..................................................................................................... 5 2.15. Media Briefing ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.16. Technical Working Sessions .................................................................................................. 6 3. HIGHLIGHTS OF STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK ....................................................................................... 7 APPENDIX 2 B: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS PLAN .......................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Backdrop – The Electrification Study ......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Overview of the Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Plan ..................................... 1 2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................ 3 2.1. Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 3 3. KEY STAKEHOLDER AUDIENCES FOR ENGAGEMENT ........................................................................ 4 3.1. Stakeholder Engagement – A Key Part of the Study ................................................................. 5 3.2. Outreach and Engagement Methods ........................................................................................ 5 4. ENGAGEMENT MECHANISMS BY AUDIENCE .................................................................................... 6 4.1. Engaged Non‐Government Stakeholders .................................................................................. 6 4.2. Government Stakeholders And Industry Service Providers ....................................................... 7 i GO Electrification Study Final Report – Appendix 2 – December 2010 4.3. Users/Commuters ..................................................................................................................... 8 4.4. General Public ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.5. First Nations .............................................................................................................................. 8 5. COMMUNICATIONS TACTICS TO SUPPORT ENGAGEMENT .............................................................. 9 6. ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS BY STUDY PHASE ........................................................... 11 7. NEXT STEPS – EARLY IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................. 14 APPENDIX 2C: STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP #1 SUMMARY REPORT ............................................................. 1 1. ABOUT STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP #1 ............................................................................................. 1 2. FORMAT OF THE WORKSHOP ........................................................................................................... 2 3. PRESENTATION HIGHLIGHTS ............................................................................................................. 3 3.1. Welcome and Overview ............................................................................................................ 3 3.2. Electrification Of The Go Transit Rail Network ......................................................................... 3 4. WORKING SESSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.1. Overview ................................................................................................................................... 7 4.2. Working Session 1: Study Approach .......................................................................................... 7 4.3. Working Session 2: Study Objectives ........................................................................................ 8 4.4. Feedback on Priority Objectives ................................................................................................ 9 5. NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX 2C‐1: “ELECTRIFICATION OF THE GO TRANSIT RAIL NETWORK” POWERPOINT PRESENTATION .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 APPENDIX 2C‐2: SAMPLE WORKSHEET ....................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX 2C‐3: SUBMITTED GROUP WORKSHEETS .................................................................................. 19 APPENDIX 2C‐4: SUBMITTED INDIVIDUAL WORKSHEETS .......................................................................... 27 APPENDIX 2D: UPDATE MEETING GEORGETOWN CORRIDOR SUMMARY REPORT .................................... 1 1. ABOUT THE ELECTRIFICATION STUDY UPDATE MEETING – GEORGETOWN CORRIDOR .................. 1 1.1. Purpose ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Attendance ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3. Format ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS RECEIVED .............................................................................................. 2 2.1. Study Approach ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2. Technology Alternatives Screening Process .............................................................................. 2 2.3. Air‐Rail Link (ARL) ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.4. Air Quality ................................................................................................................................. 4 3. NEXT STEPS ....................................................................................................................................... 5 APPENDIX 2D‐1: UPDATE MEETING INVITATION .......................................................................................... 7 ii GO Electrification Study Final Report – Appendix 2 – December 2010 APPENDIX 2D‐2: ELECTRIFICATION STUDY BACKGROUNDER ..................................................................... 11 APPENDIX 2D‐3: “ELECTRIFICATION STUDY UPDATE MEETING” POWERPOINT PRESENTATION .............. 13 APPENDIX 2D‐4: QUESTION & ANSWER PERIOD .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 APPENDIX 8B
    Appendix 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 APPENDIX 8B Incremental Capital Cost Estimates December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 8B INCREMENTAL CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2. BASIS OF ESTIMATE .......................................................................................................... 2 3. POWER SYSTEMS .............................................................................................................. 3 3.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 3 3.2. Inclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3. Assumptions .................................................................................................................................. 4 4. TRACK AND TRACK ELEMENTS .......................................................................................... 5 4.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 5 4.2. Inclusions .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR of Deer Park Joan C
    HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR OF Deer Park Joan C. Kinsella Ye Merrie Circle, at Reservoir Park, c.1875 T~ Toronto Public Library Published with the assistance of Marathon Realty Company Limited, Building Group. ~THON --- © Copyright 1996 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Toronto Public Library Board Kinsella. Joan c. (Joan Claire) 281 Front Street East, Historical walking tour of Deer Park Toronto, Ontario Includes bibliographical references. M5A412 ISBN 0-920601-26-X Designed by: Derek Chung Tiam Fook 1. Deer Park (Toronto, OnL) - Guidebooks. 2. Walking - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Printed and bound in Canada by: 3. Historic Buildings - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Hignell Printing Limited, Winnipeg, Manitoba 4. Toronto (Ont.) - Buildings, structures, etc - Guidebooks. 5. Toronto (OnL) - Guidebooks. Cover Illustrations I. Toronto Public Ubrary Board. II. TItle. Rosehill Reservoir Park, 189-? FC3097.52.K56 1996 917.13'541 C96-9317476 Stereo by Underwood & Underwood, FI059.5.T68D45 1996 Published by Strohmeyer & Wyman MTL Tll753 St.Clair Avenue, looking east to Inglewood Drive, showing the new bridge under construction and the 1890 iron bridge, November 3, 1924 CTA Salmon 1924 Pictures - Codes AGO Art Gallery of Ontario AO Archives of Ontario CTA City of Toronto Archives DPSA Deer Park School Archives JCK Joan C. Kinsella MTL Metropolitan Toronto Library NAC National Archives of Canada TPLA Toronto Public Library Archives TTCA Toronto Transit Commission Archives ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Woodlawn. Brother Michael O'Reilly, ES.C. and Brother Donald Morgan ES.C. of De La This is the fifth booklet in the Toronto Public Salle College "Oaklands" were most helpful library Board's series of historical walking in providing information.
    [Show full text]
  • Splendour Chris Layton Points Out
    DISCOVERY The jewel of the site,the North Toronto Station with HISTORICAL its clock tower stretching 145 feet into the sky is one of the most recognizable timepieces in the city. The long-time tenant of this historical building, the LCBO, also embraced Cohen’s dream, as LCBO spokesman splendour Chris Layton points out. “This is probably the most exciting store development project that we’ve ever BY MARYLENE VESTERGOM been involved with,” says Layton. “It’s not only the largest LCBO store in Canada, but we’re also assisting in the preservation of a historical building. It’s a good In the early 1900s, two major railways, Canadian Pacific and Canadian Northern, were trying fit for the LCBO because the world of wine, spirits and to find a new location for Union Station. The railways couldn’t agree on a mutual site, beer has a lot of cachet to it. It conjures up wine cel- lars and history, and it’s great when you can meld that so Canadian Pacific decided to build a new station in North Toronto, nestled in the tony world with the history of Toronto.” community of Rosedale. Unfortunately, when the station opened in 1916 the new site for Union “There’s a presence in this building,” says Cohen. Station was agreed upon, overshadowing the opening of the North Toronto Train Station at “There’s one archival picture in particular of a family lining up for tickets and they’re dressed in their Sunday Yonge Street and Summerhill Avenue, a further signal its demise would not be long.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA)
    APPENDIX M Heritage Impact Assessment – Union Station Trainshed Heritage impact assessment Union Station Trainshed GO Rail Network Electrification Project Environmental Assessment Project # 14-087-18 Prepared by GS/JN PREPARED FOR: Rodney Yee, Project Coordinator Environmental Programs & Assessment Metrolinx 20 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5J 2W3 416-202-4516 [email protected] PREPARED BY: ERA Architects Inc. 10 St. Mary Street, Suite 801 Toronto, ON M4Y 1P9 416-963-4497 Issued: 2017-01-16 Reissued: 2017-09-18 Cover Image: Union Station Trainshed, 1930. Source: Toronto Archives CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Report 1.2 Property Description 1.3 Site History 2 Methodology 11 2.1 Summary of Related Policy/Legislation/Guidelines 2.2 Material Reviewed 2.3 Date of Site Visit 3 Discussion of Cultural Heritage Value and Status 14 3.1 Discussion of Cultural Heritage Value 3.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value 3.3 Heritage Recognition 4 Site conditions 20 4.1 Current Conditions 5 Discussion of the Proposed Intervention 25 5.1 Description of Proposed Interventions 5.2 Impact Assessment 5.3 Mitigation Strategies 6 Conclusion 34 6.1 General 6.2 Revitalization Context 7 Sources 35 8 Appendix 36 Appendix 1 - Union Station Designation By-law (City of Toronto By-law 948-2005) Appendix 2 - Heritage Easement Agreement between The Toronto Terminals Railway Company Limited and the City of Toronto dated June 30, 2000 Appendix 3 - Heritage Character Statement, 1989 Appendix 4 - Commemorative Integrity Statement, 2000 Reissued: 18 September 2017 i ExEcutivE Summary This Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) revises the HIA dated January 16, 2017 in order to evaluate the impact of proposed work on existing resources at the subject site, based on an established understanding of their heritage value and attributes derived from the Heritage Statement Report - Union Station Complex, completed by Taylor Hazell Architects in June 2016 and the Union Station Trainshed Heritage Impact Assessment by Taylor Hazell Architects from July 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • TO360 Year One Round Two Consultation Report
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy (Phase III) – Year One, Round Two Consultation, March 2018 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................1 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 1 & 2 .....................................................................................................6 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 3 ........................................................................................................... 12 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 4 ........................................................................................................... 20 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 5 & 6 ................................................................................................... 28 This Consultation Report documents feedback shared in the March 2018 Local Mapping Open Houses for TO360 — Phase III. It was shared with participants for review before being finalized. Background Toronto 360 (TO360) is an effort to help people find their way by making streets, neighbourhoods, and the city more legible. Following the successful completion of a pilot project in the Financial District in 2015, the City began a five-year city-wide rollout in 2017. This rollout is focused on developing a map database that will support the future production of wayfinding maps. In Year One of the rollout, the TO360 team is developing the map database in an area bounded roughly by Lake Ontario, Royal York Road, St. Clair Avenue, and Warden Avenue. In
    [Show full text]
  • The Toronto Railway Club1931
    NEWS Since TheThe TorontoTorontoNEWS RailwayRailway ClubClub1931 Volume 27, Number 3, Fall 2008 COMING NEWS EVENTS Put these dates on your calendar! Annual Golf Tournament The Club’s popular annual golf tournament took place at the beautiful Glen Eagle Club 74th Annual Dinner in Bolton on Friday, June 13 under ideal conditions - sunny skies and warm temperatures! The tournament had approximately 244 golfers teeing off in a 9 am shotgun start with Friday, December 5, 2008, great prizes up for grabs at many of the holes. Fairmont Royal York Hotel, Toronto. See details on page 4. The tournament wrapped up with an excellent hot dinner of steak, chicken and schnitzel, Annual Meeting followed by the awarding of golf prizes and Monday, Jan. 26, 2009 a large assortment of raffle prizes. Toronto Annual Meeting and election of officers, Railway Club President Susan Reid Tanaka 5 pm at Union Station. (shown at left) welcomed the golfers and guests and thanked the members of the Annual Valentine’s Dinner- tournament organizing committee: Al Lusk, Dance Bernie Maskerine, Christopher Jones, Dan Saturday, February 14, 2009 Jagos, Bob McKeracher, James Allan, Paul Fairmont Royal York Hotel, Toronto. Kerry, Brian Kirk, Ron Hogan, Dennis Ryan and Kirk McDonald. On behalf of the Annual Golf Tournament Club, Susan also thanked the many suppliers Friday, June 19, 2009 who generously donated an magnificent array Glen Eagle Golf Club, Bolton, Ontario of prizes. The prize donors are listed on page three. More photos next page! Other Events: CANADIAN RAILWAY CLUB - 101st Annual Dinner Friday, February 6, 2009, Hotel Bonaven- ture, Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transit Grand Design for the Toronto Region Page 1 a Grand Design
    A Grand Design Transit Planning for the Toronto Region By Steve Munro March 21, 20061 Prologue Since the launch of the website www.stevemunro.ca, my thoughts on transit have reached a larger audience at a quicker rate than anything I’ve written or said in 34 years of transit advocacy. The road runs both ways, and I receive questions, comments, boos and huzzahs at a faster rate too. One of the persistent questions, especially in light of the recent debates about subway extensions, is “so what would you do?” This is one attempt to answer that question. Many will think that I have gone completely overboard, that any proposal on this scale is a wild dream that will never be taken seriously. The problem with decades of transit planning is that we have tinkered around the edges, we have treated transit as something to be done a bit at a time because it doesn’t really matter. “Transit is for everyone else – I will drive my car” is the prevailing attitude. If we are serious about building a transit city, we must do far more to show we really mean business. This means big spending on transit and smart spending on transit. This means real commitment to how transit can change our city. Any fool can announce support for one subway line that will take years to design and build while the rest of our transit systems decay. This is not intended to be The Plan, an unalterable, perfect, writ-on stone-tablets, lightning-will-strike-you-dead-if-you-ignore-my words kind of effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface
    01 Canada Rail Opportunities Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface Acknowledgements Photo and image credits The authors would like to thank the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport following organisations for their help and British Columbia Ministry of Transportation support in the creation of this publication: and Infrastructure Agence Métropolitaine de Transport BC Transit Alberta Ministry of Transport Calgary Transit Alberta High Speed Rail City of Brampton ARUP City of Hamilton Balfour Beatty City of Mississauga Bombardier City of Ottawa Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit Canadian National Railway Helen Hemmingsen, UKTI Toronto Canadian Urban Transit Association Metrolinx Edmonton Transit OC Transpo GO Transit Sasha Musij, UKTI Calgary Metrolinx Société de Transport de Montréal RailTerm TransLink SNC Lavalin Toronto Transit Commission Toronto Transit Commission Wikimedia Commons Wikipedia Front cover image: SkyTrain in Richmond, Vancouver Canada Rail Opportunities Contents Preface Foreword 09 About UK Trade & Investment 10 High Value Opportunities Programme 11 Executive Summary 12 1.0 Introduction 14 2.0 Background on Canada 15 2.1 Macro Economic Review 16 2.2 Public-Private Partnerships 18 3.0 Overview of the Canadian Rail Sector 20 4.0 Review of Urban Transit Operations and Opportunities by Province 21 4.1 Summary Table of Existing Urban Transit Rail Infrastructure and Operations 22 4.2 Summary Table of Key Project Opportunities 24 4.3 Ontario 26 4.4 Québec 33 4.5 Alberta 37 4.6 British Columbia 41 5.0 In-Market suppliers 45 5.1 Contractors 45 5.2 Systems and Rolling Stock 48 5.3 Consultants 49 6.0 Concluding Remarks 51 7.0 Annexes 52 7.1 Doing Business in Canada 52 7.2 Abbreviations 53 7.3 Bibliography 54 7.4 List of Reference Websites 56 7.5 How can UKTI Help UK Organisations Succeed in Canada 58 Contact UKTI 59 04 Canada Rail Opportunities About the Authors David Bill Helen Hemmingsen David is the International Helen Hemmingsen is a Trade Officer Development Director for the UK with the British Consulate General Railway Industry Association (RIA).
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Werner M.A.Sc., PMC, P.Eng. ASSOCIATE Jonathan
    Entuitive | Simplifying the Complex Jonathan Werner M.A.Sc., PMC, P.Eng. ASSOCIATE Jonathan Werner is an Associate at Entuitive with over 25 years of experience in structural analysis and design of bridges, subway stations and other structures. Jonathan has an extensive background in contract administration, project management, foundation investigations, bridge inspections, and structural evaluations, as well as experience on Design Build, P3 and Program Management assignments. Jonathan’s portfolio includes roles varying from inspection, deck rehabilitation, fatigue investigation, Owner’s Engineer and preliminary design on several long span/viaduct bridge projects. Some of his most notable projects include Gordie Howe IT’S HOW WE WORK AS A TEAM THAT “ International Bridge, Port Mann/Highway 1 Bridge over the Fraser DETERMINES THE SUCCESS OF THE River in Vancouver (Gateway Program), the Blue Water Bridges PROJECT. ” in Sarnia, the Sault Sainte Marie International Bridge, and the Thousand Islands Bridges. Before joining Entuitive, Jonathan held leadership positions including Project Engineering Coordinator for the $100 million York University Subway Station on the TTC Spadina Line, Lead Bridge Engineer on the $3 billion Gateway Program in Vancouver, British Columbia, and Project Manager or Structural on several projects. Awards Education Sanford Fleming Medal of Academic Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo Excellence Bachelor of Applied Science in Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo Memberships Professional
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1
    EX13.3 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Developing Toronto's Transit Network Plan: Phase 1 Date: March 3, 2016 To: Executive Committee City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and Chief Planner & From: Executive Director, City Planning Division Wards: All Reference Number: SUMMARY Significant investment has been made by all three orders of government to expand the transit network and address years of underinvestment in a critical infrastructure system for Toronto. The Toronto York-Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE), Eglinton LRT (Mount Dennis to Kennedy) and Finch West LRT will be in service by 2021. In order to sustain recent progress, planning for new transit expansion projects must keep pace given the lead times to plan, design and build complex infrastructure. The purpose of this report is to recommend advancing planning and technical analysis on SmartTrack, Scarborough Subway Extension, Relief Line and Waterfront Transit, in order to set the stage for upcoming discussions on funding and financing new transit. In particular, this report recommends: • Finalizing the SmartTrack concept by narrowing the planning analysis to focus on key elements: an optimized Eglinton West LRT extension to Pearson Airport; and two SmartTrack/GO RER integration options that propose an urban service frequency at 11 existing GO RER stations with 4 to 8 new stations on the Kitchener GO and Stouffville/Lakeshore East GO Corridors; • Approving Pape to Downtown via Queen/Richmond as the preferred corridor for the Relief Line, and proceed to determine the preferred alignment and stations; • Completing the review of corridor options and related work for the Scarborough Subway Extension, and develop recommendations to integrate the proposed, optimized Eglinton East LRT into the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus secondary plan; and identify areas in need of an Avenue Study to facilitate intensification along the proposed LRT corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • West Toronto Diamond
    West Toronto Diamond Brent Archibald, P.Eng. Vic Anderson, MSc (London), DIC, P.Eng. Joanne Crabb, P.Eng.,ing., PE Jonathan Werner, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Paper prepared for presentation at the Bridges: Economic and Social Linkages Session of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Abstract This paper describes the West Toronto Diamond project in Ontario, Canada. This project has been designed to eliminate at-grade diamond crossings of the Canadian National Railway (CN) and the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) tracks in the Junction area of Toronto, an area which takes its name from the confluence of these railways. Since the 1880’s, rail traffic here has been constrained by these diamond crossings involving the CN and CPR mainlines and a CPR Wye track. The project will result in a quantum improvement in the levels of service and safety provided by the Railways at this site. The project involves relocating the CN tracks below the CPR tracks, while at the same time maintaining all rail operations with a minimum of interruption to the Railways’ activities. The site is physically constrained and hence, in order to accomplish this goal, Delcan’s design includes the sliding of 4 mainline railway bridge spans, weighing a total of some 10,000 tonnes, into their final positions. Each slide occupies only a few hours, as it is powered by computerized high-speed tandem hydraulic jacks, moving these massive structures on steel / aluminum bronze slide paths, enabling the bridge spans to move quickly and continuously into position during brief possessions of the tracks.
    [Show full text]