DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning, Design and Development Committee Item Q1 for May 9, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning, Design and Development Committee Item Q1 for May 9, 2011 TOWN HALL 6311 Old Church Road, Caledon, ON L7C1J6 Town of caledon 905,584.227211.888.CALED0N IFAX 905.584.43251 www.caledon.ca March 28, 2011 RECEIVED CLERK'S DEPT. Region of Peel 10 Peel Centre Drive APR 0 4 2011 Brampton, Ontario L6T4B9 REG. NO.: FILE NO.: Attention: Ms. Carol Reid, Clerk PLANNING, DESIGN &DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Dear Ms. Reid: RE: Bolton Commuter Rail Service - Feasibility Study At the regular meeting of Council held on March 22, 2011, Council received Report PD-2011-019 regarding the Bolton Commuter Rail Service - Feasibility Study. The following was adopted: ThatReport PD-2011-019 regarding Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study-Metrolinx be received; and That Metrolinx be requested to expedite the implementation of GO commuter rail service to Bolton and accordingly initiate the property protection process,environmental assessment studyand detailed design process;and That Metrolinx be requested to amend its capital budget to include planning, augmentation and construction within a 10-year priority time frame tofacilitate early implementation for the GOrail service to Bolton; and That Council direct staff to work with the Region of Peel to undertake necessary steps to initiate the Official Plan Amendments as appropriate todesignate the location ofthe preferred GOstation and layover facility site;and That a copy ofReport PD-2011-019 andtheresulting Council resolution be forwarded to Metrolinx, the Regions ofPeel and York and the Cities of Brampton, Mississauga and Vaughan. Please find attached a copy of Report PD-2011-019. If you have any questions regarding the report, please contact Kant Chawla, Senior Transportation Planner at 905-584-2272- ext: 4293 or [email protected]. Yours truly, Barbara Karrandjas Legislative Administrator e-mail: barbara.karrandias(a)caledon.ca cc Kant Chawla, Senior Transportation Planner Region of Peel, Commissioner of Public Works Region of York, Clerk City of Brampton, Clerk City of Mississauga, Clerk City of Vaughan, Clerk Metrolinx, President S:\Legislative Services\C - Councii\C03 - Agendas\2011\2011-03-22 RegulanReporting OuttRB12.doc Administration Department Town of Caledon PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Policy Section Report Report PD-2011-019 To: Mayor and Members of Council From: Mary Hall, Director of Planning & Development Meeting: March 22, 2011 Subject; BOLTON COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE FEASIBLITY STUDY- METROLINX RECOMMENDATION That Report PD-2011-019 regarding Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study - Metrolinx be received; That Metrolinx be requested to expedite the implementation of GO commuter rail service to Bolton and accordingly initiate the property protection process, environmental assessment study and detailed design process; That Metrolinx be requested to amend its capital budget to include planning, augmentation and construction within a 10-year priority time frame to facilitate early implementation for the GO rail service to Bolton; That Council direct staff to work with the Region of Peel to undertake necessary steps to initiate the Official Plan Amendments as appropriate to designate the location of the preferred GO station and layover facility site; and; That a copy of Report PD-2011-019 and the resulting Council resolution be forwarded to Metrolinx, the Regions of Peel and York and the Cities of Brampton, Mississauga and Vaughan. ORIGIN/BACKGROUND In June 2007, the Province of Ontario announced the launch of the MoveOntario 2020 initiative, a multi-year rapid transit action plan to develop 900 kilometres of new or improved rapid transit lines in and around the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). A new GO rail service between Bolton and Union Station was among the 52 MoveOntario 2020 projects announced by the Government of Ontario. It was also one of the initiatives recommended in the 15 Year Plan of the Regional Transportation Plan completed by Metrolinx in 2008. Subsequently, the Province approved a series of "Quick Wins" projects that could produce tangible benefits within a five year time-frame. One of these proposed projects included the improvement of service frequencies and bus/rail connections for the Bolton GO Transit bus services. It was anticipated that the implementation of bus service improvements would stimulate ridership and support the initiation of the Bolton to Union Station GO transit commuter rail expansion identified in the Metrolinx 15 Year Plan. Report PD-2011-019 Page 1 of 6 S:\C1I - Reportsto CounciMOl1\PD-2011-019 BoltonCommuter RailService-Feasibility Study\PD-2011-019 - FINALdoc March 14, 2011 Town of Caledon In 2008, Metrolinx released a Strategic Plan (GO 2020) which presented GO Transit's direction to the year 2020. The Plan provides the basis for GO Transit's 10-year capital program, three-year operating plan, annual business plans and budgets in order to provide convenient and comfortable longer-distance transportation service to current and potential future customers. Furthermore, Metrolinx confirmed the needs of the Bolton commuter rail service in the GO 2020 Strategic Plan which identifies the requirement to provide peak period train service at 30 minute frequencies on Bolton Corridor. Peel Region and the Town of Caledon had recognized the need for commuter rail service in Bolton a decade ago. Peel Region retained MMM Group to carry out the "Bolton GO Station Needs and Feasibility Study (2002) and an Update was conducted in 2007. The update report identified the triangular parcel west to the rail track south of King Street between Coleraine Drive and Humber Station Road as the preferred site for the location of GO train station in Bolton. The location is displayed in Schedule B. The Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study has since been completed and released in late December 2010. Metrolinx took the Region of Peel study as an input and conducted the Bolton Commuter Rail Service Feasibility Study in order to reconfirm the needs for the Bolton commuter GO rail service and assess the feasibility of routing options and ridership forecasts. The study further examined the rail and non-rail infrastructure requirements. During the course of the study, staff input was sought through meetings to discuss the potential GO Rail station locations within Bolton. The discussions also included projected growth (population and employment) in the Town of Caledon and future planned road improvements. DISCUSSION As noted in the preceding section, the feasibility study examined the service and infrastructure requirements to provide a new commuter rail service to Bolton on an existing freight rail corridor where no passenger service currently exists. The feasibility study assessed the projected ridership demands, service options, conceptual station and layover facilities, track capacity, potential property requirements, environmental issues and rail/non-rail infrastructure components. The study reconfirmed the need for the Bolton commuter GO rail service based on the projected growth in population and employment, and high potential growth in rail ridership. Ridership forecasts indicate that demand. exists to support an inaugural service to provide a direct peak period service (3 peak trains) between Bolton and Union Station. The GO transit Bolton commuter rail service will serve up to eight passenger stations within the corridor length of approximately 43 km. The minimum and maximum distance between any two adjacent stations is approximately 2.4 and 10.3 km respectively (Executive Summary attached as Schedule A). The following are some of the key areas discussed in the GO Transit feasibility report: Service Options Four different service options were considered in the study which included direct rail service from Bolton to Union Station and service options involving passenger transfer Report PD-2011-019 Page 2 of 6 S:\Cll-Reportsto CouncuMOl1\PD-2011-019 Bolton CommuterRail Service-FeasibilityStudy\PD-2011-019 - FINALdoc March 14, 2011 ©\-\* Town of Caledon between Bolton and Georgetown corridor trains at Weston/Mount Dennis stations. The preferred Service Option 4 provides direct rail access to Union Station and will serve 4 new stations using rail tracks of CP Mactier Subdivision. The line will have station stops at Bolton, Weinberg, Vaughan, Woodbridge, York University, Downsview and Union Station. The recommended rail route and rail stations are shown in Schedule C. End to end trip duration is anticipated at just less than an hour. It is estimated to have a base capital cost of $268 million to cover the cost of building the necessary additional track, signals, structures/culverts, station facilities, parking, tunnels, and trains. Station Facilities The locations for new GO Transit stations were investigated in order to serve all major communities in the vicinity of the line and so that direct access from major arterial roads was possible. The recommended site for the GO station in Bolton is different from the site that was identified in the 2007 Region of Peel Study (Update of the Bolton GO Station Needs and Feasibility Study). The presently recommended site in Metrolinx Feasibility Study is located on a property northeast of Humber Station Road and King Street, extending west to the rail track. The recommended station location site is 3.64 hectares in size (as shown in Schedule B). The Metrolinx report assessed the pros and cons of all the potential station sites in Bolton and identified the preferred location for the following reasons: • Adequate access to the arterial road network (i.e.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications
    Appendix 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 APPENDIX 2 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications December 2010 Prepared for: Prepared by: 20 Bay Street, Suite 901 Toronto ON M5J 2N8 In Association with: APPENDIX 2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX 2A: STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION ...................................................... 1 1. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................. 1 1.4. Overview of Engagement Methodology ................................................................................... 2 2. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS TO DATE ....................................................................... 3 2.1. Non‐Government Stakeholder List and Study Database ........................................................... 3 2.2. Electrification Study Website .................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Stakeholder Workshop # 1 ........................................................................................................ 4 2.4. Metrolinx Planning and Transportation Leaders Forum ........................................................... 4 2.5. GO Transit Customer Service Advisory Committee Meeting ..................................................... 4 2.6. Update Meeting (Georgetown Corridor) ................................................................................... 4 2.7. Municipal Transit Leaders Briefing
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Investigation Report In
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R11T0016 MAIN TRACK DERAILMENT CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FREIGHT TRAIN 220-24 MILE 105.1, MACTIER SUBDIVISION BUCKSKIN, ONTARIO 26 JANUARY 2011 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Main-Track Derailment Canadian Pacific Railway Freight Train 220-24 Mile 105.1, MacTier Subdivision Buckskin, Ontario 26 January 2011 Report Number R11T0016 Summary On 26 January 2011, at approximately 0310, Eastern Standard Time, as Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) freight train 220-24 was travelling southward at about 45 mph, one of its cars derailed at Mile 105.1 of the CP MacTier Subdivision, near Buckskin, Ontario. The train continued on to the Buckskin north siding switch at Mile 103.7 where an additional 20 cars, including dangerous goods tank car PROX 33743, loaded with non-odorized liquefied petroleum gas (UN 1075), derailed. Some of the derailed cars side-swiped northbound CP freight train 221-25, which was stationary in the Buckskin siding, derailing its lead locomotive, and damaging the second locomotive and the first 9 cars on train 221. As a precaution, 15 families from the nearby area were evacuated. There were no injuries and no loss of product. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. - 2 - Other Factual Information Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Canadian National (CN) operate parallel trans-continental rail routes throughout the area. Under a bidirectional running agreement, both railways operate primarily empty trains northbound on CP track between Mile 20.1 and Mile 112.7 of the Parry Sound Subdivision, and loaded southbound trains on CN track between Mile 146.2 and Mile 247.5 of the CN Bala Subdivision, respectively (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR of Deer Park Joan C
    HISTORICAL WALKING TOUR OF Deer Park Joan C. Kinsella Ye Merrie Circle, at Reservoir Park, c.1875 T~ Toronto Public Library Published with the assistance of Marathon Realty Company Limited, Building Group. ~THON --- © Copyright 1996 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Toronto Public Library Board Kinsella. Joan c. (Joan Claire) 281 Front Street East, Historical walking tour of Deer Park Toronto, Ontario Includes bibliographical references. M5A412 ISBN 0-920601-26-X Designed by: Derek Chung Tiam Fook 1. Deer Park (Toronto, OnL) - Guidebooks. 2. Walking - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Printed and bound in Canada by: 3. Historic Buildings - Ontario - Toronto - Guidebooks Hignell Printing Limited, Winnipeg, Manitoba 4. Toronto (Ont.) - Buildings, structures, etc - Guidebooks. 5. Toronto (OnL) - Guidebooks. Cover Illustrations I. Toronto Public Ubrary Board. II. TItle. Rosehill Reservoir Park, 189-? FC3097.52.K56 1996 917.13'541 C96-9317476 Stereo by Underwood & Underwood, FI059.5.T68D45 1996 Published by Strohmeyer & Wyman MTL Tll753 St.Clair Avenue, looking east to Inglewood Drive, showing the new bridge under construction and the 1890 iron bridge, November 3, 1924 CTA Salmon 1924 Pictures - Codes AGO Art Gallery of Ontario AO Archives of Ontario CTA City of Toronto Archives DPSA Deer Park School Archives JCK Joan C. Kinsella MTL Metropolitan Toronto Library NAC National Archives of Canada TPLA Toronto Public Library Archives TTCA Toronto Transit Commission Archives ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Woodlawn. Brother Michael O'Reilly, ES.C. and Brother Donald Morgan ES.C. of De La This is the fifth booklet in the Toronto Public Salle College "Oaklands" were most helpful library Board's series of historical walking in providing information.
    [Show full text]
  • Splendour Chris Layton Points Out
    DISCOVERY The jewel of the site,the North Toronto Station with HISTORICAL its clock tower stretching 145 feet into the sky is one of the most recognizable timepieces in the city. The long-time tenant of this historical building, the LCBO, also embraced Cohen’s dream, as LCBO spokesman splendour Chris Layton points out. “This is probably the most exciting store development project that we’ve ever BY MARYLENE VESTERGOM been involved with,” says Layton. “It’s not only the largest LCBO store in Canada, but we’re also assisting in the preservation of a historical building. It’s a good In the early 1900s, two major railways, Canadian Pacific and Canadian Northern, were trying fit for the LCBO because the world of wine, spirits and to find a new location for Union Station. The railways couldn’t agree on a mutual site, beer has a lot of cachet to it. It conjures up wine cel- lars and history, and it’s great when you can meld that so Canadian Pacific decided to build a new station in North Toronto, nestled in the tony world with the history of Toronto.” community of Rosedale. Unfortunately, when the station opened in 1916 the new site for Union “There’s a presence in this building,” says Cohen. Station was agreed upon, overshadowing the opening of the North Toronto Train Station at “There’s one archival picture in particular of a family lining up for tickets and they’re dressed in their Sunday Yonge Street and Summerhill Avenue, a further signal its demise would not be long.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transit in Toronto Levyrapidtransit.Ca TABLE of CONTENTS
    The Neptis Foundation has collaborated with Edward J. Levy to publish this history of rapid transit proposals for the City of Toronto. Given Neptis’s focus on regional issues, we have supported Levy’s work because it demon- strates clearly that regional rapid transit cannot function eff ectively without a well-designed network at the core of the region. Toronto does not yet have such a network, as you will discover through the maps and historical photographs in this interactive web-book. We hope the material will contribute to ongoing debates on the need to create such a network. This web-book would not been produced without the vital eff orts of Philippa Campsie and Brent Gilliard, who have worked with Mr. Levy over two years to organize, edit, and present the volumes of text and illustrations. 1 Rapid Transit in Toronto levyrapidtransit.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 INTRODUCTION 7 About this Book 9 Edward J. Levy 11 A Note from the Neptis Foundation 13 Author’s Note 16 Author’s Guiding Principle: The Need for a Network 18 Executive Summary 24 PART ONE: EARLY PLANNING FOR RAPID TRANSIT 1909 – 1945 CHAPTER 1: THE BEGINNING OF RAPID TRANSIT PLANNING IN TORONTO 25 1.0 Summary 26 1.1 The Story Begins 29 1.2 The First Subway Proposal 32 1.3 The Jacobs & Davies Report: Prescient but Premature 34 1.4 Putting the Proposal in Context CHAPTER 2: “The Rapid Transit System of the Future” and a Look Ahead, 1911 – 1913 36 2.0 Summary 37 2.1 The Evolving Vision, 1911 40 2.2 The Arnold Report: The Subway Alternative, 1912 44 2.3 Crossing the Valley CHAPTER 3: R.C.
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo
    UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo On Oct. 15, 1989, CPR's yard trackage in Goderlch, Ont. was almost completely dismantled, this being the western terminus of the 80- mile Goderlch Sub. from Guelph. This view, looking west toward Lake Huron, shows the station (which, hopefully, will survive) and the engine shed, right. ^^^^^ Western visitor: two of these Edmonton Transit trolley coaches are in Toronto for tests. The bodies were built by General Motors and the motors and controls by Brown Boveri; the 100-unit order commenced service in the Alberta capital eight years ago. This view of 178 was taken in Edmonton on July 13, 1983. _Dave Chalmers Survivor: 60 years young and still apparently going strong in CPR Engineering Dept. service was former ore car 376784, photographed on a siding beside the railway's West Toronto Shop, Nov. 4, 1989. It was built by Canadian Car & Foundry to the designs of the Hart- Otis Car Co.; the 25-foot car was designed to hold 80 tons of nickel ore. The railway ordered several hundred such cars in the 1920s. __john D. Thompson UCRS Newsletter • January 1990 * 3 CP Rail's New The tenninal will have four 609 metre (2,000 foot) working tracks under three gantry cranes, along with six storage and makeup tracks of similar length. The accompanying cross- sectional schematic shows the positioning of the cranes relative to the tracks. The facility will be connected to the MacTier VAUGHAN Subdivision by two 1,525 metre (5,000 foot) lead tracks; a wye track layout wfll permit access and egress from both north and south.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth Order of Proceedings
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH MEETING OF COUNCIL MEETING NO. 2015-06 MONDAY MARCH 9, 2015 Council Chambers 10 Wellington Street East, Alliston, Ontario 7:00 P.M. CHAIR: MAYOR RICK MILNE ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS Awards and Recognitions Confirmation of Agenda Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest Adoption of Minutes Communications Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion Adoption of Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion Deputations Requiring Statutory or Public Meeting Deputations Relating to New Matters Consideration of Items Held For Separate Discussion By -laws New Business Public Notice Confirming By-law Adjournment Correspondence intended for Committee and/or Council is generally received as public information, subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Any person submitting correspondence shall advise the Clerk of any confidential items and the general nature of the confidentiality. 2 A G E N D A Council Meeting No. 2015-06 March 9, 2015 Awards and Recognitions NOTE TO USERS Nil Click on Item (ie: Minutes, Reports, etc.) to Confirmation of Agenda immediately view that item. Press “Home” key to go back to Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest the first page of the agenda. Adoption of Council Minutes Council Meeting No. 2015-03, February 9, 2015 Special Council Meeting No. 2015-04, February 20, 2015 Special Council Meeting No. 2015-05, March 2, 2015 Communications COM-1 EDGERTON D. FORSYTH Memorial Wall of Names of Canada’s Fallen Project, February 14, 2015 COM-2 COUNTY OF SIMCOE Free Mulch and Compost Distribution Program, February 20, 2015 Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion Adoption of Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion Deputations Requiring Statutory or Public Meeting Deputations Relating to New Matters DEP-1 MARIE SHAW Re: Petition to Lower Speed Limit on the 10th Sideroad from the 5th Line to Highway 9 from 80 kph to 60 kph 3 Items for Consideration: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA)
    APPENDIX M Heritage Impact Assessment – Union Station Trainshed Heritage impact assessment Union Station Trainshed GO Rail Network Electrification Project Environmental Assessment Project # 14-087-18 Prepared by GS/JN PREPARED FOR: Rodney Yee, Project Coordinator Environmental Programs & Assessment Metrolinx 20 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5J 2W3 416-202-4516 [email protected] PREPARED BY: ERA Architects Inc. 10 St. Mary Street, Suite 801 Toronto, ON M4Y 1P9 416-963-4497 Issued: 2017-01-16 Reissued: 2017-09-18 Cover Image: Union Station Trainshed, 1930. Source: Toronto Archives CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Report 1.2 Property Description 1.3 Site History 2 Methodology 11 2.1 Summary of Related Policy/Legislation/Guidelines 2.2 Material Reviewed 2.3 Date of Site Visit 3 Discussion of Cultural Heritage Value and Status 14 3.1 Discussion of Cultural Heritage Value 3.2 Statement of Cultural Heritage Value 3.3 Heritage Recognition 4 Site conditions 20 4.1 Current Conditions 5 Discussion of the Proposed Intervention 25 5.1 Description of Proposed Interventions 5.2 Impact Assessment 5.3 Mitigation Strategies 6 Conclusion 34 6.1 General 6.2 Revitalization Context 7 Sources 35 8 Appendix 36 Appendix 1 - Union Station Designation By-law (City of Toronto By-law 948-2005) Appendix 2 - Heritage Easement Agreement between The Toronto Terminals Railway Company Limited and the City of Toronto dated June 30, 2000 Appendix 3 - Heritage Character Statement, 1989 Appendix 4 - Commemorative Integrity Statement, 2000 Reissued: 18 September 2017 i ExEcutivE Summary This Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) revises the HIA dated January 16, 2017 in order to evaluate the impact of proposed work on existing resources at the subject site, based on an established understanding of their heritage value and attributes derived from the Heritage Statement Report - Union Station Complex, completed by Taylor Hazell Architects in June 2016 and the Union Station Trainshed Heritage Impact Assessment by Taylor Hazell Architects from July 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • TO360 Year One Round Two Consultation Report
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy (Phase III) – Year One, Round Two Consultation, March 2018 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................1 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 1 & 2 .....................................................................................................6 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 3 ........................................................................................................... 12 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 4 ........................................................................................................... 20 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 5 & 6 ................................................................................................... 28 This Consultation Report documents feedback shared in the March 2018 Local Mapping Open Houses for TO360 — Phase III. It was shared with participants for review before being finalized. Background Toronto 360 (TO360) is an effort to help people find their way by making streets, neighbourhoods, and the city more legible. Following the successful completion of a pilot project in the Financial District in 2015, the City began a five-year city-wide rollout in 2017. This rollout is focused on developing a map database that will support the future production of wayfinding maps. In Year One of the rollout, the TO360 team is developing the map database in an area bounded roughly by Lake Ontario, Royal York Road, St. Clair Avenue, and Warden Avenue. In
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian
    THE CANADIAN 60 Years of Trans-continental Passenger Service 1955 - 2015 VOLUME 1A: The Canadian Pacific Era 1955 – 1978 Eastern Canada C. van Steenis, Calgary, AB. April 2015 CONTENTS Though by no means complete, this series is a pictorial history of Canadian Pacific Railway’s THE CANADIAN and VIA Rail’s CANADIAN marking 60 years of operation from the inaugural runs on 24 April 1955 to 2015; in four volumes: Vol. 1A: The Canadian Pacific Era 1955-1978 in Eastern Canada Vol. 1B: The Canadian Pacific Era 1955-1978 in Western Canada Vol. 2: The Via Rail Canada Era 1978-2015 Vol. 3: Motive Power & Passenger Equipment This Volume, 1A, focuses on Canadian Pacific’s ‘THE CANADIAN’ in eastern Canada, from the terminals in Montreal and Toronto to Sudbury, Ontario. The author wishes to express thanks to the following individuals who kindly provided photos and/or information for this volume: William Baird, James Brown, Bruce Chapman, Peter Cox, Kevin Day, Peter Layland, Bill Linley, Jim Parker, Doug Phillips, Ron Richie, Robert Sandusky and Dale Wilson. Photo Credits: All photos are used with the permission of the photographers. The photos of the old stations from the early part of the 20th century are in the public domain; the copyright has expired. Cover Photo: The last CPR ‘THE CANADIAN’ departs Renfrew, Ontario, on 28 October 1978 – Bruce Chapman Photo CPR Skyline Dome 517 - 1954 Builder’s Photo THE ORIGINAL ORDER Striving to reverse the trend of declining passenger volumes after World War II and to replace aging equipment, in June of 1953 the Canadian Pacific Railway placed its initial order (of two orders) for 173 stainless steel cars with the Budd Company of Philadelphia, PA.
    [Show full text]
  • A Transit Grand Design for the Toronto Region Page 1 a Grand Design
    A Grand Design Transit Planning for the Toronto Region By Steve Munro March 21, 20061 Prologue Since the launch of the website www.stevemunro.ca, my thoughts on transit have reached a larger audience at a quicker rate than anything I’ve written or said in 34 years of transit advocacy. The road runs both ways, and I receive questions, comments, boos and huzzahs at a faster rate too. One of the persistent questions, especially in light of the recent debates about subway extensions, is “so what would you do?” This is one attempt to answer that question. Many will think that I have gone completely overboard, that any proposal on this scale is a wild dream that will never be taken seriously. The problem with decades of transit planning is that we have tinkered around the edges, we have treated transit as something to be done a bit at a time because it doesn’t really matter. “Transit is for everyone else – I will drive my car” is the prevailing attitude. If we are serious about building a transit city, we must do far more to show we really mean business. This means big spending on transit and smart spending on transit. This means real commitment to how transit can change our city. Any fool can announce support for one subway line that will take years to design and build while the rest of our transit systems decay. This is not intended to be The Plan, an unalterable, perfect, writ-on stone-tablets, lightning-will-strike-you-dead-if-you-ignore-my words kind of effort.
    [Show full text]