DOCSLIB.ORG

Railway Investigation Report R04t0008 Main-Track

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Railway Investigation Report R04t0008 Main-Track RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R04T0008 MAIN-TRACK DERAILMENT CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY TRAIN NO. 239-13 MILE 178.20, BELLEVILLE SUBDIVISION WHITBY, ONTARIO 14 JANUARY 2004 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Main-Track Derailment Canadian Pacific Railway Train No. 239-13 Mile 178.20, Belleville Subdivision Whitby, Ontario 14 January 2004 Report Number R04T0008 Synopsis On 14 January 2004, at approximately 1942 eastern standard time, Canadian Pacific Railway intermodal train 239-13, travelling westward, derailed 11 car platforms transporting 18 containers at Mile 178.20 of the Belleville Subdivision. The derailment occurred just east of the overpass at Garden Street in Whitby, Ontario. Some of the rail car platforms and containers fell onto the roadway below, striking a southbound vehicle and fatally injuring the two occupants. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. © Minister of Public Works and Government Services 2006 Cat. No. TU3-6/04-1E ISBN 0-662-42997-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Factual Information ............................................................................1 1.1 The Accident ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Site Examination.......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Damage to Track Infrastructure................................................................................ 6 1.4 Other Damage.............................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Personnel Information................................................................................................ 7 1.5.1 Train Crew ................................................................................................................... 7 1.5.2 Rail Traffic Control ..................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Particulars of the Track............................................................................................... 8 1.7 Track Inspection and Testing .................................................................................... 8 1.8 Wayside Inspection Systems ..................................................................................... 9 1.8.1 Hot Bearing, Hot Wheel and Dragging Equipment Detector Systems ............... 9 1.8.2 Wheel Impact Load Detector Systems ..................................................................... 9 1.9 Rail Car Inspection.................................................................................................... 10 1.9.1 Inspection of Train 239 Before Lonsdale................................................................ 10 1.9.2 Inspection of Train 239 at Lonsdale Siding ........................................................... 10 1.9.3 Hot Wheel Inspection of Train 239 at Belleville.................................................... 10 1.9.4 Inspection of Train 239 at Trenton.......................................................................... 11 1.10 Method of Train Control .......................................................................................... 11 1.11 Rail Traffic Control Operations at Canadian Pacific Railway ............................ 11 1.11.1 Rail Traffic Control Offices ...................................................................................... 12 1.11.1.1 Montréal Rail Traffic Control Office....................................................................... 12 1.11.1.2 Communication of Safety Issues Between Rail Traffic Control Offices ............ 13 1.11.2 Management of the Rail Traffic Controller’s Workload and Mental Fatigue... 14 1.11.2.1 Rail Traffic Control Procedures Concerning Workload and Rest ...................... 14 1.11.2.2 Rail Traffic Controller’s Workload on January 14................................................ 16 1.11.2.3 Managing Workload and Fatigue in Air Traffic Control..................................... 17 1.11.3 Documentation of Safety-Critical Information ..................................................... 17 1.11.3.1 Rail Traffic Control Planning Sheet for January 14 .............................................. 19 1.12 Unidentified Track Occupancies............................................................................. 19 1.12.1 Rail Traffic Control Procedure for Unidentified Track Occupancies ................ 20 1.12.2 Rail Traffic Controller Training for the Unidentified Track Occupany Procedure ................................................................................................................... 21 1.12.3 Response to Unidentifed Track Occupancies Following Train 239 ................... 21 1.12.3.1 Mile 121.10 (Colborne) – First Unidentified Track Occupancy Behind Train 239 ..................................................................................................................... 21 1.12.3.2 Mile 155.80 (Lovekin) – Second Unidentified Track Occupancy Behind Train 239 ..................................................................................................................... 22 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.12.3.3 Mile 168.70 (Darlington) – Third Unidentified Track Occupancy Behind Train 239 ..................................................................................................................... 22 1.13 Regulatory Overview of Rail Traffic Control Operations ................................... 23 1.14 Main-Track Derailments During Winter Conditions........................................... 25 1.15 Canadian Pacific Railway Winter Operating Plan ............................................... 25 1.15.1 Canadian Pacific Railway Cold Weather Slow Order Policy.............................. 26 1.16 Transportation Safety Board of Canada Engineering Laboratory Examination ............................................................................................................... 27 1.16.1 Examination of Broken Rails ................................................................................... 27 1.16.2 Examination of Broken Wheel................................................................................. 28 1.16.3 Ultrasonic Testing for Internal Wheel Defects ...................................................... 29 1.17 Other Occurrences Involving Southern Wheels ................................................... 29 1.17.1 Main-Track Derailment due to Broken Wheel – Heron Bay ............................... 30 1.17.2 Broken Wheel Occurrence – Telkwa ...................................................................... 31 1.18 Manufacturing of Southern Wheels ....................................................................... 31 2.0 Analysis ..............................................................................................33 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 33 2.2 The Accident .............................................................................................................. 33 2.3 Broken Wheel............................................................................................................. 34 2.4 Inspection and Reporting of Track Damage.......................................................... 36 2.5 Actions Following the Unidentified Track Occupancy at Lovekin.................... 36 2.5.1 Actions of the Rail Traffic Controller ..................................................................... 36 2.5.2 Actions of the Assistant Manager, Rail Traffic Control....................................... 37 2.6 Management of the Rail Traffic Controller’s Workload ...................................... 37 2.7 Rail Traffic Control Procedure for Responding to Unidentified Track Occupancies ............................................................................................................... 39 2.8 Documentation of Safety-Critical Information ..................................................... 40 2.8.1 Procedures for Train Planning Sheets .................................................................... 40 2.8.2 Documentation During Periods of High Workload............................................. 40 2.9 Management of Rail Traffic Controller Mental Fatigue ...................................... 40 2.10 Safety Communication Between Rail Traffic Control Offices............................ 41 3.0 Conclusions........................................................................................43 3.1 Findings as to Causes and Contributing Factors.................................................. 43 3.2 Findings as to Risk .................................................................................................... 43 4.0 Safety Action......................................................................................45 4.1 Action Taken.............................................................................................................. 45 4.1.1 Transport Canada’s Auditing and Regulatory Actions....................................... 45 4.1.2 Inspection and Reporting of Damaged or Broken Rail........................................ 45 4.1.3 Rail Traffic Control
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download This Investigation Report In
    RAILWAY INVESTIGATION REPORT R11T0016 MAIN TRACK DERAILMENT CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY FREIGHT TRAIN 220-24 MILE 105.1, MACTIER SUBDIVISION BUCKSKIN, ONTARIO 26 JANUARY 2011 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Railway Investigation Report Main-Track Derailment Canadian Pacific Railway Freight Train 220-24 Mile 105.1, MacTier Subdivision Buckskin, Ontario 26 January 2011 Report Number R11T0016 Summary On 26 January 2011, at approximately 0310, Eastern Standard Time, as Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) freight train 220-24 was travelling southward at about 45 mph, one of its cars derailed at Mile 105.1 of the CP MacTier Subdivision, near Buckskin, Ontario. The train continued on to the Buckskin north siding switch at Mile 103.7 where an additional 20 cars, including dangerous goods tank car PROX 33743, loaded with non-odorized liquefied petroleum gas (UN 1075), derailed. Some of the derailed cars side-swiped northbound CP freight train 221-25, which was stationary in the Buckskin siding, derailing its lead locomotive, and damaging the second locomotive and the first 9 cars on train 221. As a precaution, 15 families from the nearby area were evacuated. There were no injuries and no loss of product. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. - 2 - Other Factual Information Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Canadian National (CN) operate parallel trans-continental rail routes throughout the area. Under a bidirectional running agreement, both railways operate primarily empty trains northbound on CP track between Mile 20.1 and Mile 112.7 of the Parry Sound Subdivision, and loaded southbound trains on CN track between Mile 146.2 and Mile 247.5 of the CN Bala Subdivision, respectively (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront
    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 " Sears Eldredge Macalester College
    Macalester College DigitalCommons@Macalester College Book Chapters Captive Audiences/Captive Performers 2014 Chapter 6a. "Chungkai Showcase": Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 " Sears Eldredge Macalester College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/thdabooks Recommended Citation Eldredge, Sears, "Chapter 6a. "Chungkai Showcase": Chungkai Hospital Camp | Part One: Mid-October 1942 to Mid-May 1944 "" (2014). Book Chapters. Book 16. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/thdabooks/16 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Captive Audiences/Captive Performers at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 184 Chapter 6: “Chungkai Showcase” Chungkai Hospital Camp Part One: Mid-October 1942 to to Mid-May 1944 FIGURE 6.1. CHUNGKAI THEATRE LOGO. HUIB VAN LAAR. IMAGE COPYRIGHT MUSEON, THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS. Though POWs in other camps in Thailand produced amazing musical and theatrical offerings for their audiences, it was the performers in Chungkai who, arguably, produced the most diverse, elaborate, and astonishing entertainment on the Thailand-Burma railway. Between Christmas 1943 and May 1945 they presented over sixty-five musical or theatrical productions. As there is more detailed information about the administration, production, and reception of the entertainment at Chungkai than at any other camp on the railway, the focus in this chapter will be on those productions and personalities that stand out in some significant way artistically, technically, or politically. To cover this material adequately, the chapter will be divided into two parts: Part One will cover the period from mid-October 1942 to mid-May 1944; Part Two, from mid-May 1944 to July 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives
    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
    [Show full text]
  • Pullman Car Services - Archive
    Pullman Car Services - Archive Pullman & CIWL News “The quality of service is remembered long after the price is forgotten” September & October 2017 Edition No.38. Pullman & La Compagnie Internationale des Wagons -Lits et des Grand Express Européens News Edition No.38 - September & October 2017 - Page 1 of 72 COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Paul Blowfield - Communications & Marketing Officer, MNLPS - www.clan-line.org July 5th, 2017, marking 50 years to the day that the last steam hauled ‘Bournemouth Belle’ ran. The Merchant Navy Locomotive Preservation Society No.35028 Clan Line with ‘The Bournemouth Belle’ (Belmond British Pullman Cars) passing through Weybridge Station on the ‘Down’ main line. From the Coupé. Welcome aboard your bi-monthly newsletter. I take this opportunity to thank those readers who have kindly taken time to forward contributions in the form of articles and photographs for this edition. I remain dependent on contributions of news, articles (Word) and photographs (jpg) formats in all aspects of Pullman and CIWL operations both past, present, future and related aspects within model railways. All I ask of you for the time I spend in producing your newsletter, is for you to forward on by either E-mail or printing a copy, to any one you believe would be interested in reading your newsletter. Publication of the newsletter being scheduled on or about the 1st of January, March, May, July, September and November. The next edition editorial deadline date of Saturday October 28th, with the scheduled publication date of Wednesday November 1st, 2017. The views and articles within this publication are not necessarily those of the editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Depot Tower Interlocking Plant
    Union Depot Tower Union Depot Tower (U.D. Tower) was completed in 1914 as part of a municipal project to improve rail transportation through Joliet, which included track elevation of all four railroad lines that went through downtown Joliet and the construction of a new passenger station to consolidate the four existing passenger stations into one. A result of this overall project was the above-grade intersection of 4 north-south lines with 4 east-west lines. The crossing of these rail lines required sixteen track diamonds. A diamond is a fixed intersection between two tracks. The purpose of UD Tower was to ensure and coordinate the safe and timely movement of trains through this critical intersection of east-west and north-south rail travel. UD Tower housed the mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection, also known as an interlocking plant. Interlocking Plant Interlocking plants consisted of the signaling appliances and tracks at the intersections of major rail lines that required a method of control to prevent collisions and provide for the efficient movement of trains. Most interlocking plants had elevated structures that housed mechanisms for controlling the various rail switches at the intersection. Union Depot Tower is such an elevated structure. Source: Museum of the American Railroad Frisco Texas CSX Train 1513 moves east through the interlocking. July 25, 1997. Photo courtesy of Tim Frey Ownership of Union Depot Tower Upon the completion of Union Depot Tower in 1914, U.D. Tower was owned and operated by the four rail companies with lines that came through downtown Joliet.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations
    Phase 1 Interim Report Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations City of Toronto Prepared for the City of Toronto by IBI Group and Stantec August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Document Control Page CLIENT: City of Toronto City-Wide Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail PROJECT NAME: Operations Land Use Study: Development in Proximity to Rail Operations REPORT TITLE: Phase 1 Interim Report - DRAFT IBI REFERENCE: 105734 VERSION: V2 - Issued August 30, 2017 J:\105734_RailProximit\10.0 Reports\Phase 1 - Data DIGITAL MASTER: Collection\Task 3 - Interim Report for Phase 1\TTR_CityWideLandUse_Phase1InterimReport_2017-08-30.docx ORIGINATOR: Patrick Garel REVIEWER: Margaret Parkhill, Steve Donald AUTHORIZATION: Lee Sims CIRCULATION LIST: HISTORY: Accessibility This document, as of the date of issuance, is provided in a format compatible with the requirements of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005. August 30, 2017 IBI GROUP PHASE 1 INTERIM REPORT LAND USE STUDY: DEVELOPMENT IN PROXIMITY TO RAIL OPERATIONS Prepared for City of Toronto Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of the Standard Gauge
    The Myth of the Standard Guage: Rail Guage Choice in Australia, 1850-1901 Author Mills, John Ayres Published 2007 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith Business School DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/426 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366364 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au THE MYTH OF THE STANDARD GAUGE: RAIL GAUGE CHOICE IN AUSTRALIA, 1850 – 1901 JOHN AYRES MILLS B.A.(Syd.), M.Prof.Econ. (U.Qld.) DEPARTMENT OF ACCOUNTING, FINANCE & ECONOMICS GRIFFITH BUSINESS SCHOOL GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2006 ii ABSTRACT This thesis describes the rail gauge decision-making processes of the Australian colonies in the period 1850 – 1901. Federation in 1901 delivered a national system of railways to Australia but not a national railway system. Thus the so-called “standard” gauge of 4ft. 8½in. had not become the standard in Australia at Federation in 1901, and has still not. It was found that previous studies did not examine cause and effect in the making of rail gauge choices. This study has done so, and found that rail gauge choice decisions in the period 1850 to 1901 were not merely one-off events. Rather, those choices were part of a search over fifty years by government representatives seeking colonial identity/autonomy and/or platforms for election/re-election. Consistent with this interpretation of the history of rail gauge choice in the Australian colonies, no case was found where rail gauge choice was a function of the disciplined search for the best value-for-money option.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Accident Report
    Rail Accident Report Derailment of a passenger train near Cummersdale, Cumbria 1 June 2009 Report 06/2010 March 2010 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2010 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.raib.gov.uk. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.raib.gov.uk DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. * Cover photo courtesy of Network Rail Derailment of a passenger train near Cummersdale, Cumbria, 1 June 2009 Contents Preface 5 Key Definitions 5 The Accident 6 Summary of the accident 6 The parties involved 7 Location 8 External circumstances 8 The trains involved 10 Events preceding the accident 10 Events during the accident 10 Consequences of the accident 11 Events following the accident 11 The Investigation
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo
    UPPER CANADA RAILWAY SOCIETY BOX 122 STATION "A" TORONTO, ONTARIO Photo On Oct. 15, 1989, CPR's yard trackage in Goderlch, Ont. was almost completely dismantled, this being the western terminus of the 80- mile Goderlch Sub. from Guelph. This view, looking west toward Lake Huron, shows the station (which, hopefully, will survive) and the engine shed, right. ^^^^^ Western visitor: two of these Edmonton Transit trolley coaches are in Toronto for tests. The bodies were built by General Motors and the motors and controls by Brown Boveri; the 100-unit order commenced service in the Alberta capital eight years ago. This view of 178 was taken in Edmonton on July 13, 1983. _Dave Chalmers Survivor: 60 years young and still apparently going strong in CPR Engineering Dept. service was former ore car 376784, photographed on a siding beside the railway's West Toronto Shop, Nov. 4, 1989. It was built by Canadian Car & Foundry to the designs of the Hart- Otis Car Co.; the 25-foot car was designed to hold 80 tons of nickel ore. The railway ordered several hundred such cars in the 1920s. __john D. Thompson UCRS Newsletter • January 1990 * 3 CP Rail's New The tenninal will have four 609 metre (2,000 foot) working tracks under three gantry cranes, along with six storage and makeup tracks of similar length. The accompanying cross- sectional schematic shows the positioning of the cranes relative to the tracks. The facility will be connected to the MacTier VAUGHAN Subdivision by two 1,525 metre (5,000 foot) lead tracks; a wye track layout wfll permit access and egress from both north and south.
    [Show full text]
  • The Corporation of the Town of New Tecumseth Order of Proceedings
    THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF NEW TECUMSETH MEETING OF COUNCIL MEETING NO. 2015-06 MONDAY MARCH 9, 2015 Council Chambers 10 Wellington Street East, Alliston, Ontario 7:00 P.M. CHAIR: MAYOR RICK MILNE ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS Awards and Recognitions Confirmation of Agenda Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest Adoption of Minutes Communications Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion Adoption of Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion Deputations Requiring Statutory or Public Meeting Deputations Relating to New Matters Consideration of Items Held For Separate Discussion By -laws New Business Public Notice Confirming By-law Adjournment Correspondence intended for Committee and/or Council is generally received as public information, subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Any person submitting correspondence shall advise the Clerk of any confidential items and the general nature of the confidentiality. 2 A G E N D A Council Meeting No. 2015-06 March 9, 2015 Awards and Recognitions NOTE TO USERS Nil Click on Item (ie: Minutes, Reports, etc.) to Confirmation of Agenda immediately view that item. Press “Home” key to go back to Disclosures of Pecuniary Interest the first page of the agenda. Adoption of Council Minutes Council Meeting No. 2015-03, February 9, 2015 Special Council Meeting No. 2015-04, February 20, 2015 Special Council Meeting No. 2015-05, March 2, 2015 Communications COM-1 EDGERTON D. FORSYTH Memorial Wall of Names of Canada’s Fallen Project, February 14, 2015 COM-2 COUNTY OF SIMCOE Free Mulch and Compost Distribution Program, February 20, 2015 Determination of Items Requiring Separate Discussion Adoption of Items Not Requiring Separate Discussion Deputations Requiring Statutory or Public Meeting Deputations Relating to New Matters DEP-1 MARIE SHAW Re: Petition to Lower Speed Limit on the 10th Sideroad from the 5th Line to Highway 9 from 80 kph to 60 kph 3 Items for Consideration: 1.
    [Show full text]