The Meaning and Etymology of Barzakh in Illuminationist Philosophy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Meaning and Etymology of Barzakh in Illuminationist Philosophy CHAPTER 6 The Meaning and Etymology of Barzakh in Illuminationist Philosophy Malihe Karbassian Shihāb al-Dīn Yaḥyā Suhrawardī (d. 587/1191),1 the Iranian founder of Illuminationist philosophy (ḥikmat al-ishrāq), frequently attributes the source of his thoughts to early Iranian traditions preserved in ancient texts.2 His refer- ences remain unverifiable, but the relationship between his usage of ancient terms versus their common usage has been studied by lexicographers and students of philosophy and merits re-examination. One such term is barzakh, “body” in Suhrawardī’s usage, a term that in New Persian denotes a realm be- tween paradise and hell3 and has other connotations in Persian and Arabic in the medieval period as well. The following is a brief review of various definitions and interpretations of barzakh in major sources, beginning with classical lexicons and texts where barzakh is identified as an Arabic term. In Arabic lexicons, barzakh is defined as “barrier,” “a barrier between two things,” “a barrier between paradise and hell,”4 as well as “the grave,”5 and “wall”.6 1 For his life and works see: Ziai, Knowledge and Illumination, pp. 9–11; Ziai, “The Source and Nature of Authority”, pp. 304–344; Walbridge, The Leaven of the Ancients, ch. 2. 2 See, for example, Corbin, Les motifs zoroasrtriens, pp. 22–62; Corbin, En Islam iranien, vol. II, pp. 96–104, 141–159; Walbridge, The Wisdom of the Mystic East, pp. 42–50. 3 Pākatchī, “Barzakh”, p. 697; al-Tahānawī, “Kashshāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn,” p. 322; Gheissari, “Fawākih al-basāṭīn,” p. 791. The place between paradise and hell, called aʿrāf in Islamic tradi- tion, is hamastagān in Zoroastrianism. The reason why these two terms have been replaced with barzakh merits examination. 4 al-Farāhīdī, Kītāb al-ʿayn, vol. 4, p. 338; al-Jawharī, Ṣiḥāḥ al-lugha, vol. 1, p. 419; al-Ṭurayḥī, Majmaʿ al-baḥrayn, vol. 1, p. 186; al-Zabīdī, Tāj al-ʿarūs, vol. 4, p. 260. 5 al-Ṭabarsī, Tafsīr Majmaʿ al-bayān, vol. 7, p. 209. 6 Mashkūr, Farhang-i taṭbīqī, vol. 1, p. 60. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���8 | doi ��.��63/9789004358393_007 Meaning and Etymology of Barzakh 87 In three Qurʾanic verses, barzakh signifies the distance between two rivers (Sūrat al-Furqān, verse 53; Sūrat al-Raḥmān, verse 20) and between this world and the next (Sūrat al-Muʾminūn, verse 23),7 or more generally, distance.8 In Sufi and mystical traditions, barzakh stands for the visible world between the realm of non-material, simple meanings and that of material objects,9 or in Ibn ʿArabī’s words,10 suspended forms (ʿālam al-mithāl al-miqdārī). To Sufis, the “all-inclusive barrier” (barzakh-i jāmiʿ) or the “barrier of barriers” (barzakh al-barāzikh) signifies the “presence of supreme unity” (ḥażrat-i aḥadiyyat) and the “first essence” (ʿayn-i awwal), which is the origin of all barriers (barāzikh). As such, it is also called the “greater barrier” (barzakh-i akbar) and the “first barrier” (barzakh-i awwal).11 As noted by Sayyid Ḥaydar Āmulī, some think- ers consider “the barrier of barriers” to be the first creature, or, in Aristotelian terminology, the First Intellect from which all other creatures are generated.12 Suhrawardī uses barzakh to signify bodies (ghasaq), i.e., created beings in this world, which al-Tahānawī and Muṣāḥab explain as follows: To Illuminationists, barzakh refers to the body ( jism). Sharḥ Ḥikmat al- Ishrāq describes the divine lights (anwār ilāhīyya) and explains that to Illuminationist sages, barzakh indicates the body because it refers to the barrier between two things. Opaque bodies share the same quality.13 Illuminationist sages call the body, which is dark and cannot be illumi- nated until it is connected to a foreign light (nūr-i ghayr), barzakh.14 While al-Tahānawī characterizes an “opaque body” as a barrier, he does not elaborate on the nature of things separated by a barrier. Assuming one side of the barrier comprises non-materiality, what, precisely, lies on the other side? It cannot be bodies ( jismānīyyāt) because the body, the barzakh, acts as a barrier. As for Muṣāḥab, he observes that a “dusky body” cannot exit darkness without 7 al-Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, Mufradāt gharīb al-Qurʾān, p. 43. 8 Zaki, “Barzakh”, pp. 204–207. 9 Jurjānī, al-Taʿrīfāt, p. 41. Unfortunately, Jurjānī uses the vague term Sufi without further explanations, as does ʿAbd al-Razzāq Kāshānī in Muʿjam-i iṣtilāḥāt al-ṣūfiyya, p. 63. 10 Ibn ʿArabī, al-Futūḥāt al-Makiyya, vol. 3, p. 46. 11 Jurjānī, al-Taʿrīfāt, p. 45. 12 Āmulī, “Naqd al-nuqūd”, p. 688. 13 al-Tahānawī, Kashshāf iṣṭilāḥāt al-funūn, p. 322. According to Corbin (En Islam iranien, vol. II, pp. 108–109), barzakh is a barrier against light because it is darkness; barzakh as a barrier causes the light to appear. 14 Muṣāḥab, Dāʾirat al-maʿārif-i fārsī, vol. 1, p. 405; for original sources see Shahrazūrī, Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-ishrāq, p. 288; Quṭb a-Dīn Shīrāzī, Sharḥ Ḥikmat al-ishrāq, p. 285..
Recommended publications
  • What Is Hades, Hell and Heaven? Many People Are Confused About
    What is hades, hell and heaven? Many people are confused about the difference between "hades" and "hell." Some Bible translations make no distinction in the two words. What about "heaven?" What do you know about the place where the righteous will dwell? Let's take a serious look in the Bible to see if we can find the distinctions and answers to these places of reality. I. IS THERE A DISTINCTION MADE BETWEEN "HADES" AND "HELL"? A. Even though some Bible translations make no distinctions, the original writers of the Greek New Testament made distinctions between them using two different Greek words. B. The two words: "Hades" and "Geenna" or "Gehenna". II. WHAT ARE THE TWO WORDS FOR HADES AND HELL? A. Hades. (26) "Therefore My heart was glad and My tongue exulted; moreover My flesh also will live in hope; (27) because You will not abandon My soul to Hades, nor allow Your Holy One to undergo decay.” Acts 2:26-27 1. Peter is preaching to the Jews on the day of Pentecost, and quotes from the Psalms to show David was speaking about Jesus. 2. At the death of Jesus, what happened to His soul (v.27)? 3. What happened to His body (v.27)? "He looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that He was neither abandoned to Hades, nor did His flesh suffer decay." Acts 2:31 4. His soul was not abandoned to Hades and His flesh (body) did not remain long enough to decay. 5. Hades is a temporary holding place of the unrighteous souls.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Descent Into Hell</I>
    Volume 20 Number 2 Article 2 Spring 3-15-1994 The Mythical Method of Descent Into Hell Evans Lansing Smith Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Evans Lansing (1994) "The Mythical Method of Descent Into Hell," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 20 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol20/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract Considers Williams’s Descent Into Hell as an excellent “example of the use of the mythical method [as defined by T.S. Eliot] as a metaphor of poesis, by which the fundamental forms of the imagination are catalyzed.” Geometrical symbolism and the underworld journey link it to many modernist works.
    [Show full text]
  • What Hell Is, the Lake of Fire
    WHAT HELL IS, THE LAKE OF FIRE Nowhere in Scripture is hell described as a torture chamber where people are forced against their will to undergo agonizing pain. Mahew 13:49,50 Hell is described as a place of torment. Torment is self-inflicted by one’s own will. Torment is the anguish that results from being evil as a result of selfish choices and being quaranned from all that is lovely and good. Gnashing of teeth is not about repentance. Weeping and gnashing of teeth is living out self indignaon toward good and God. Hell does not contain people sorry for their injusces, but people angry for not being able to have their way and angry at being separated from the common grace of God which gave them freedom to choose their own path. Those who are cast into hell would not be happy in heaven because they were never born again of the Spirit so have never lost the aptude for sin and evil. Their happiness is in sin and yet sin has them bound in isolaon. Satan is not tormenng the lost souls. Satan is being tormented. The torment of hell is solely self-induced. And not every lost soul is tormented to the same degree. Self-induced torment is inflicted to the degree that anger has enveloped their being. Doing good to your enemy is somemes described as heaping coals of fire upon their head. Hell is depicted as a place of eternal fire. The fire is real, but not necessarily physical. People in hell will have imperishable physical bodies, so normal fire will not affect them.
    [Show full text]
  • Heaven and Hell These Guides Integrate Bible Study, Prayer, and Worship to Help Us Treat the Transcendent Realities of Heaven and Hell Carefully and Seriously
    Study Guides for Heaven and Hell These guides integrate Bible study, prayer, and worship to help us treat the transcendent realities of heaven and hell carefully and seriously. The guides can be used in a series or individually. Christian Reflection You may reproduce them for personal or group use. A Series in Faith and Ethics Living Under Vacant Skies 2 As our culture loses the thought of heaven “over us,” how does that shape the way we live? A world left without a vision of the transcendent is a world of struggles without victory and of sacrifice without purpose. To understand this is also to understand in a new way the task of the church. The Virtue of Hope 4 If we are to pursue our moral life seriously, we need a transcendent hope that is not based on human capacity for self-improvement. We have grounds in our faith for such a hope, both at the individual level and at the level of society. Heaven is Our Home 6 Is our true home in heaven, and we are merely sojourners on earth? Or are we genuinely citizens of the earth? Where is our true home? The biblical message is that heaven is our true home, but heaven begins here on earth as the Holy Spirit transforms us into a community that manifests love. Unquenchable Fire 8 We have many questions about hell. We can begin to answer these questions by studying the biblical passages about Sheol, Hades, and Gehenna. The Gates of Hell Shall Not Preva il 10 The universe and our lives ultimately are bounded by God’s unfathomable love and righteousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord of the Nether\Ųorld
    6 that LORD OF THE NETHER\ØORLD also rela anc. À furt b.y coe: Giv dou the the mu wol Yet first draw near the lower halls of Dis I and through the lands ofdeep Avernus seek, for my son, a meeting with me. I am nor hin among sad Shades, in impious Tartarus; riat my home is in Elysium, among ent the gracious gatherings ofthe pious ones. to! Yirgil, Aeneid Y : 96 7-8' l .. ass( oU SLEEP THÂT YoU MAY VAKE; YoU DIE THAT YOU MAY LIVE'' SAY THE PYRAMID TEXTS \ ^T I formulating the Egyptian hope of regeneration in "archaic. brevity."' As Peter Kingsley thc Th puts it as well in discussing ritual death and descent and immortalization and ascent in early M( Greek philosoph¡ "one dies to be reborn; one descends into the depths in order to ascend."3 Mr In the Golden Ass or Metamorphoses of Apuleius, for example, "the initiation of Lucius into the tio mysteries of Isis at Kenchreai involves a free-will death, a dying of the old life, and a rebirth no culminating in his emergence in the likeness of the sun god."4 In this state of free-will death, cio the candidare is confronted by invisible powers of the netherworld in the shape of good and be evil genii. He identifies himself with them, which is the best method of getting to know them to and gaining power over rhem.t The Egyptian New Kingdom royal funerary text known as the tht Amduat,for instance, conrains formulaic sentences that emphasize a familiaricy with the beings del in the netherworld for a safe nocturnal journey.d In ancient Mesopotamia, the netherworld is usually described as a gloomy land of the ln dead.
    [Show full text]
  • 119–144 God of Heaven and Sheol: the “Unearthing”
    Hebrew Studies 58 (2017): 119–144 GOD OF HEAVEN AND SHEOL: THE “UNEARTHING” OF CREATION Scott B. Noegel University of Washington in Gen 1:1 must mean ָה ָארֶ ץ Abstract: In this contribution I argue that as אֶרֶ ץ the underworld.” After surveying evidence for rendering“ “underworld” elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible, and examining cognate evidence from Mesopotamia and Ugarit, I contend that, as a merism, as “the heavens and the underworld” here makes ה ָארֶ ץ and הַשׁמַָיִם reading better sense in terms of Israelite cosmology. I then illustrate how attention to the cosmological merism improves our understanding of the biblical creation and of several other passages beyond Genesis. Afterwards, I examine some historical factors that precluded later generations from -in Gen 1:1 as the “underworld.” The article con ה ָארֶ ץ understanding cludes with an excursus on Enuma Elish. Gen 1:1–2 בְּרֵ אשִׁ יתָבּ ר אָאֱ ֹלהִ יםָאֵ תָהַשׁמַ יִםָוְאֵ תָהאָרֶ ץ וְהאָרֶ ץָה יְתהָתֹהוָּו בֹהוָּוְחֹשֶׁ ְךָעַל־פְּ נֵיָתְ הֹוםָוְ רוּחַ ָאֱ ֹלהִ יםָמְרַחֶפֶתָעַ ל־פְּ נֵיָהַמּיִם 1. In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2. And the earth was void-and-waste, and darkness was over the face of the deep, and the spirit of God hovered over the face of the waters. These two majestic verses are arguably the most famous in Scripture. They bring us into a remote world, informed by an omniscient narrator inspired with secret knowledge of the origins of the cosmos. Of course, one reason for their renown is that they open both the Hebrew and Christian canonical Bibles, and thus, they have been engrained in Western religious tradition for two millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • H Is for Heaven, Hell and Other Afterlives
    © RE Today / Lat Blaylock What’s it all about? Life after death Many religions teach that the soul – the real you – can live beyond the grave. If that is true, where does the HEAVEN soul go? Heaven and hell are words in common use, but what do different Christians believe about these two Hs? In the contemporary world many Christians + HELL don’t follow the medieval idea that hell is – literally – a H place where some souls are burned forever. Maybe hell is more like a metaphor for the harm we do ourselves? Will a God of love send people to hell? Heaven is where God reigns eternally: the perfect divine kingdom. Purgatory, the place between heaven and hell, where your sinful soul can be purged, is part of Roman Catholic belief. Jannah is the Muslim word for Paradise: the dead will lie in the ground until the Day of Judgment, when Allah will weigh up our hearts and lives, taking the good to Jannah. Buddhist thinking is different: rebirth follows this life because of the attachments we gather through our bad actions, but our good actions and thoughts can help us towards a more virtuous rebirth. Being born human is a The concept of hell seems medieval to precious gift – don’t waste it, or you’ll be back. The end some people: does a God of love punish of the cycle of rebirth and attachment is Nirvana – bliss sinners with eternal fire? But does beyond this world, the state of enlightenment. human freedom mean that if there is All religions do agree though that the way this life is heaven, there would have to be hell too? lived will have an impact on the life beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Teleological Progression from Hell to Purgatory in the Poetry of T.S
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1982 The Non-Teleological Progression from Hell to Purgatory in the Poetry of T.S. Eliot Dianne R. Costanzo Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Costanzo, Dianne R., "The Non-Teleological Progression from Hell to Purgatory in the Poetry of T.S. Eliot" (1982). Dissertations. 2085. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2085 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1982 Dianne R. Costanzo THE NON-TELEOLOGICAL PROGRESSION FROM HELL TO PURGATORY IN THE POETRY OF T. S. ELIOT by Dianne R. Costanzo A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 1982 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Harry Puckett, whose belief and encouragement helped to focus and clarify my "visions and revisions." Working under his supervision was always a pleasure and a privilege. Sincere appreciation also goes to Dr. Patrick Casey, Dr. Bernard McElroy, and Dr. Agnes Donohue, who also served on this dissertation committee, providing valid sug­ gestions and valuable time. A most special thanks goes to Lynn, Reggie, and Sean, for they gave laughter, sanity, and real friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Going to Hel: the Consequences of a Heathen Life
    Going to Hel: The Consequences of a Heathen Life by William P. Reaves © 2014 For a moral code to remain in effect in any religion, there must be consequences for not following that code. Since Heathenism has a highly developed moral code, it stands to reason that it also spoke of the consequences of leading a life in accordance with or in opposition to its own moral standards, yet according to popular belief there is no mechanism for that to happen — primarily because Snorri’s Edda doesn’t mention a court to judge the dead or any reward for leading a pious heathen life; warriors go to Valhalla and everyone else goes to Hel, a dreary, dismal place. Do the sources of Heathen belief confirm this view? Fáfnismál 10 informs us: því at einu sinni “For there is a time skal alda hverr when every man fara til heljar heðan. shall journey hence to Hel." Fáfnismál unequivocally states that all men eventually travel to Hel. It names no exceptions. Other sources confirm that in heathen times, the way and its features were well known. Gylfaginning 49 (A. Broedur tr.): “Frigg spoke, and asked who there might be among the Æsir who would fain have for his own all her love and favor: let him ride the road to Hel, and seek if he may find Baldr, and offer Hel a ransom if she will let Baldr come home to Ásgard." And later in the same narrative: “…Now this is to be told concerning Hermódr, that he rode nine nights through dark dales and deep, so that he saw not before he was come to the river Gjöll and rode onto the Gjöll-Bridge; which bridge is thatched with glittering gold.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Difference Between Sheol, Hades, Hell, the Lake of Fire
    What is the difference between Sheol, Hades, Hell, the lake of fire, Paradise, and Abraham’s bosom? www.gotquestions.org Question: "What is the difference between Sheol, Hades, Hell, the lake of fire, Paradise, and Abraham’s bosom?" Answer: The different terms used in the Bible for heaven and hell— sheol, hades, gehenna, the lake of fire, paradise, and Abraham’s bosom—are the subject of much debate and can be confusing. The word “paradise” is used as a synonym for heaven (2 Corinthians 12:3–4; Revelation 2:7). When Jesus was dying on the cross and one of the thieves being crucified with Him asked Him for mercy, Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43). Jesus knew that His death was imminent and that He would soon be in heaven with His Father. Therefore, Jesus used paradise as a synonym for heaven, and the word has come to be associated with any place of ideal loveliness and delight. Abraham’s bosom is referred to only once in the Bible—in the story of Lazarus and the rich man (Luke 16:19-31). It was used in the Talmud as a synonym for heaven. The image in the story is of Lazarus reclining at a table leaning on Abraham’s breast—as John leaned on Jesus' breast at the Last Supper—at the heavenly banquet. There are differences of opinion about what exactly Abraham’s bosom represents. Those who believe the setting of the story is a period after the Messiah’s death and resurrection see Abraham’s bosom as synonymous with heaven.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Calvin's Eschatology Part 1
    Aspects of Calvin's Eschatology Part 1 KENNETB YEA TON The Precursory Vision of God, the Intermediate State It is generally admitted that there is an interim state of existence between death and the Parousia, which is in some respects different from the state after the resurrection. 1 But when it comes to the nature of this intermediate existence a few questions arise and unfortunately the New Testament does not supply us with a great quantity of evidence about this period of time. But if we believe in both life and after death, the intermediate state, and a future parousia, we must find an adequate way of dealing with the question of what this between state consists. Some of the opinions on man's state after death but prior to the resurrection have resulted in the beliefs that: 1. The soul is in a state of unconscious repose, soul sleep. 2. The underworld is made up of two compartments, one for the righteous saint such as Lazarus and the other for the wicked such as the rich man. 2 3. The intervening state of the believer, while not yet perfect, enters a state of Purgatorium that expiates the believer. 3 Karel Hanhart goes so far as to say of the intermediate state: 'the intermediate state is a problem child of theology'. The reason it is such a perplexing question is: It is called a problem child because it indeed is a child of theology, a product of reflection. Eschatological concepts, such as Parousia, Resurrection, and the Last Judgment are taken directly from the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • Hell and the Problem of Evil
    Hell and the Problem of Evil Andrei A. Buckareff and Allen Plug Marist College and Malone University 1. Introduction While accounts of the nature of hell vary within and between religious traditions, formulations of the traditional doctrine include at least the following five elements. E1 Some persons do or will reside in hell and will be there for an infinite period of time. E2 Hell is the residence of those persons who have failed to satisfy some condition(s) dictated by God as necessary to avoid hell and enjoy heaven. E3 The cumulative well-being and well-being at any moment of any resident of hell is negative. E4 Those in hell are blocked from leaving. E5 Those in hell are consigned to hell as punishment for either failing to satisfy the condition(s) God requires for one to avoid hell or for actual sins committed or both. In this essay we explain why the doctrine of hell poses a problem of evil for traditional theists in the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) and how some have responded to the problem. Our focus is entirely on recent work in analytic philosophical theology. Given that the recent philosophical debates over hell have largely transpired within the context of the Christian theistic tradition, Christian theism provides the backdrop for how we frame the problem and some of the responses in much of what follows. However, this should not be taken as an indication of the problem as unique to traditional Christianity or even that the responses to the problem considered are only available to those who are working from within the Christian tradition.
    [Show full text]