DOCSLIB.ORG

Variations in Gnai2 and Rgs1 Expression Affect Chemokine Receptor Signaling and the Organization of Secondary Lymphoid Organs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Variations in Gnai2 and Rgs1 Expression Affect Chemokine Receptor Signaling and the Organization of Secondary Lymphoid Organs Genes and Immunity (2010) 11, 384–396 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 1466-4879/10 www.nature.com/gene ORIGINAL ARTICLE Variations in Gnai2 and Rgs1 expression affect chemokine receptor signaling and the organization of secondary lymphoid organs IY Hwang, C Park, KA Harrision, NN Huang and JH Kehrl B-Cell Molecular Immunology Section, Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA Ligand bound chemoattractant receptors activate the heterotrimeric G-protein Gi to stimulate downstream signaling pathways to properly position lymphocytes in lymphoid organs. Here, we show how variations in the expression of a chemokine receptor and in two components in the signaling pathway, Gai2 and RGS1, affect the output fidelity of the signaling pathway. Examination of B cells from mice with varying numbers of intact alleles of Ccr7, Rgs1, Gnai2, and Gnai3 provided the basis for these results. Loss of a single allele of either Gnai2 or Rgs1 affected CCL19 triggered chemotaxis, whereas the loss of a single allele of Ccr7, which encodes the cognate CCL19 receptor, had little effect. Emphasizing the importance of Gnai2, B cells lacking Gnai3 expression responded to chemokines better than did wild-type B cells. At an organismal level, variations in Rgs1 and Gnai2 expression affected marginal zone B-cell development, splenic architecture, lymphoid follicle size, and germinal center morphology. Gnai2 expression was also needed for the proper alignment of MOMA-1 þ macrophages and MAdCAM-1 þ endothelial cells along marginal zone sinuses in the spleen. These data indicate that chemoattractant receptors, heterotrimeric G-proteins, and RGS protein expression levels have a complex interrelationship that affects the responses to chemoattractant exposure. Genes and Immunity (2010) 11, 384–396; doi:10.1038/gene.2010.27; published online 27 May 2010 Keywords: heterotrimeric G-protein; RGS protein; chemotaxis; calcium flux; spleen; marginal zone Introduction ing as evidenced by depressed chemotaxis, defective homing to lymph nodes, poor adherence to lymph node Chemoattractants help to recruit and position lympho- high endothelial venules, and decreased motility within cytes and dendritic cells in lymphoid organs and lymph node follicles.8,9 inflammatory sites.1–3 Most lymphocyte chemoattrac- GPCRs such as chemokine receptors exist in multiple tants and chemokines signal through G-protein-coupled dynamic states including ligand bound, inactive, and receptors (GPCRs) that use the heterotrimeric G-protein G-protein coupled, which influence G-protein activation 3 Gi to activate downstream effectors. The binding of and subsequent downstream signaling. A recent study ligand activates receptors triggering Gai subunits to used parameter variation and sensitivity analysis exchange GTP for GDP, resulting in the dissociation of to examine the ligand- and cell-specific parameters, the Ga subunit from its associated Gbg heterodimer. The which determine cellular responses in a dynamic model 12 release of Gi-associated Gbg subunits is necessary for of GPCR signaling. Not surprisingly, the most impor- 4,5 triggering directional migration. As Ga subunits tant factor was the ability of the ligand to trigger an possess an intrinsic GTPase activity, GTP hydrolysis active receptor conformation, but in addition, several leads to the re-assembly of heterotrimeric G-protein cell-specific parameters strongly correlated with G- causing signaling to cease.6,7 Lymphocytes express two protein activation. The three most important in rank 8,9 À/À members of the Gai subfamily, Gai2 and Gai3. Gnai3 order were G-protein concentration, Ga GTPase activity, mice were reportedly without a phenotype10; however, and receptor expression.12 Notably, these results indicate more recently, a defect in the early seeding of the thymus that the expression of a GPCR or G-protein several-fold by progenitors has been observed.11 Gnai2À/À mice above or below endogenous levels could result in exhibit defective lymphocyte chemokine receptor signal- responses inconsistent with those measured in endogen- ous systems, thereby providing a caveat for the inter- pretation of results from transfection studies. Also, Correspondence: Dr JH Kehrl, B-Cell Molecular Immunology small variations in cell-specific parameters may actually Section, Laboratory of Immunoregulation, National Institute of change a ligand-induced positive response to a negative Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 9000 one.12 Rockville Pike, Building 10, Rm. 11B08, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Because of the ease of assessing chemokine receptor Received 14 December 2009; revised and accepted 16 March 2010; expression by flow cytometry, immunologists have published online 27 May 2010 focused on those levels as a measure of chemokine Chemoattractant signaling and secondary lymphoid organs IY Hwang et al 385 responsiveness largely ignoring two other potentially have used have been backcrossed 3–6 generations onto important cell-specific parameters, G-protein levels and C57BL/6 background and have thrived normally. Double Ga GTPase activity, the later which largely depends on heterozygote crosses were bred to generate mice with the the presence of RGS proteins in the system.13 Increas- varying alleles of Rgs1 and Gnai2. The double knockout ingly, attention has been focused on RGS proteins as a mice exhibited the same smaller stature as did the new class of pharmaceutical targets.14 In this study, we Gnai2À/À mice (Figure 1). Analysis of the frequency of the examined the consequences of altering Gai2 and RGS1 different genotypes obtained from these crosses revealed levels on B-cell responses to three different chemokines an increased representation of the wild-type Gnai2 allele CXCL12, CXCL13, and CCL19 by using B cells from mice in the offspring. The most over represented genotype with one or two disrupted alleles of Rgs1 or Gnai2 and among the mice was Rgs1 þ /À/Gnai2 þ / þ , whereas the from mice that have various combinations of disrupted Rgs1 allele status had little effect on the survival of the and wild-type alleles of these two genes.8,15 In addition, mice lacking both Gnai2 alleles. There was also we compared the responsiveness of B cells from wild- the suggestion that the lack of one allele of Gnai2 type mice to those with only one intact allele of Ccr7. Our negatively impacted the survival of the mice. results indicate that the RGS1/Gai2 ratio is an important parameter to consider in assessing B-cell chemokine Varying levels of Gnai2 and Rgs1 expression affected B-cell responsiveness. They also provide some insights into the responses to chemokines role of G-protein signaling in the organization of the In lymphocytes, the loss of a single allele of Gnai2 B splenic lymphoid architecture. reduced Gai2 levels 50%, whereas Gai3 levels increased a similar amount. A loss of both alleles of Gnai2 resulted in a several-fold increase in Gai3 levels compared with controls.8 The loss of Gnai3 has been reported to Results 17 not significantly impact Gai2 expression levels and the À/À The generation of mice for analysis and the impact of genotype Gnai3 lymphocytes we used had similar Gai2 expres- on early mouse viability sion as did littermate controls (data not shown). The On a C57BL/6 background, the Rgs1À/À mice bred and disruption of a single allele of Rgs1 reduced Rgs1 mRNA thrived similar to wild-type mice, whereas the Gnai2À/À expression 50% (data not shown). To determine the mice bred poorly or not at all and were maintained as relative importance of Gnai2 and Rgs1 expression on heterozygotes. Litters from heterozygotic crosses gener- chemokine receptor signaling in B lymphocytes, we ated lower than expected numbers of Gnai2À/À mice. An prepared splenic B cells from mice with various earlier study had reported that Gnai2 þ /À intercrosses disrupted alleles of Gnai2 and Rgs1 and tested them produced 9.7% Gnai2À/À mice versus the expected 25%. using standard chemotaxis assays to CXCL12, CCL19, A significant loss of Gnai2À/À mice was reported to occur and CXCL13. The specific migration to three different perinatally.16 In our colony, Gnai2À/À mice are smaller concentrations of chemokine was measured. We found than their wild-type littermates and often die before 6 that loss of one allele of Rgs1 increased responses to all months of age of varying causes. The Gnai3À/À mice we three chemokines and the loss of a second allele further Figure 1 Intercross of Rgs1 þ /À and Gnai2 þ /À mice. Photographs of representative wild-type, Gnai2À/À, and Rgs1À/À/Gnai2À/À C57/BL6 mice. The result of genotyping mice from double heterozygote crosses is shown below the photographs. The percentage of each of the different genotypes is shown and the predicted frequency of the genotype is given in parentheses. The results are from genotyping 342 mice. The P-values are significantly different for each observed genotype number versus expected genotype number (Po0.001 by w2-tests). Genes and Immunity Chemoattractant signaling and secondary lymphoid organs IY Hwang et al 386 Figure 2 Comparison of B cells prepared from the different genotypes in standard chemotaxis assays. B cells purified from wild type and mice with varying intact alleles of Rgs1 and Gnai2 were subjected to a 2-h chemotaxis in response to different concentrations of CXCL12, CCL19, or CXCL13 as indicated. The percentages of cells responding to are shown. The results are mean and standard error of sextuplet samples from four experiments and are shown as percentage-specific migration. Statistical significance was calculated using Mann–Whitney t-test compared with Rgs1 þ / þ Gnai2 þ / þ (*Po0.05, **Po0.01, and ***Po0.001). Specific migration is the percentage cells responding to chemokine minus the percentage cells that spontaneously migrate in the absence of chemokine. increased the specific migration of B lymphocytes measure of heterotrimeric G-protein activation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Role of the Mtor Pathway in Developmental Reprogramming Of
    THE ROLE OF THE MTOR PATHWAY IN DEVELOPMENTAL REPROGRAMMING OF HEPATIC LIPID METABOLISM AND THE HEPATIC TRANSCRIPTOME AFTER EXPOSURE TO 2,2',4,4'- TETRABROMODIPHENYL ETHER (BDE-47) An Honors Thesis Presented By JOSEPH PAUL MCGAUNN Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________________________________** Alexander Suvorov 05/18/20 10:40 ** Chair ________________________________________________________** Laura V Danai 05/18/20 10:51 ** Committee Member ________________________________________________________** Scott C Garman 05/18/20 10:57 ** Honors Program Director ABSTRACT An emerging hypothesis links the epidemic of metabolic diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diabetes with chemical exposures during development. Evidence from our lab and others suggests that developmental exposure to environmentally prevalent flame-retardant BDE47 may permanently reprogram hepatic lipid metabolism, resulting in an NAFLD-like phenotype. Additionally, we have demonstrated that BDE-47 alters the activity of both mTOR complexes (mTORC1 and 2) in hepatocytes. The mTOR pathway integrates environmental information from different signaling pathways, and regulates key cellular functions such as lipid metabolism, innate immunity, and ribosome biogenesis. Thus, we hypothesized that the developmental effects of BDE-47 on liver lipid metabolism are mTOR-dependent. To assess this, we generated mice with liver-specific deletions of mTORC1 or mTORC2 and exposed these mice and their respective controls perinatally to
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Coupling Probabilities of G-Protein Coupled Receptors Gurdeep Singh1,2,†, Asuka Inoue3,*,†, J
    Published online 30 May 2019 Nucleic Acids Research, 2019, Vol. 47, Web Server issue W395–W401 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz392 PRECOG: PREdicting COupling probabilities of G-protein coupled receptors Gurdeep Singh1,2,†, Asuka Inoue3,*,†, J. Silvio Gutkind4, Robert B. Russell1,2,* and Francesco Raimondi1,2,* 1CellNetworks, Bioquant, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany, 2Biochemie Zentrum Heidelberg (BZH), Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany, 3Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan and 4Department of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA Received February 10, 2019; Revised April 13, 2019; Editorial Decision April 24, 2019; Accepted May 01, 2019 ABSTRACT great use in tinkering with signalling pathways in living sys- tems (5). G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) control multi- Ligand binding to GPCRs induces conformational ple physiological states by transducing a multitude changes that lead to binding and activation of G-proteins of extracellular stimuli into the cell via coupling to situated on the inner cell membrane. Most of mammalian intra-cellular heterotrimeric G-proteins. Deciphering GPCRs couple with more than one G-protein giving each which G-proteins couple to each of the hundreds receptor a distinct coupling profile (6) and thus specific of GPCRs present in a typical eukaryotic organism downstream cellular responses. Determining these coupling is therefore critical to understand signalling. Here, profiles is critical to understand GPCR biology and phar- we present PRECOG (precog.russelllab.org): a web- macology. Despite decades of research and hundreds of ob- server for predicting GPCR coupling, which allows served interactions, coupling information is still missing for users to: (i) predict coupling probabilities for GPCRs many receptors and sequence determinants of coupling- specificity are still largely unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathognomonic and Epistatic Genetic Alterations in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/674259; this version posted June 19, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Pathognomonic and epistatic genetic alterations in 2 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma 3 4 Man Chun John Ma1¥, Saber Tadros1¥, Alyssa Bouska2, Tayla B. Heavican2, Haopeng Yang1, 5 Qing Deng1, Dalia Moore3, Ariz Akhter4, Keenan Hartert3, Neeraj Jain1, Jordan Showell1, 6 Sreejoyee Ghosh1, Lesley Street5, Marta Davidson5, Christopher Carey6, Joshua Tobin7, 7 Deepak Perumal8, Julie M. Vose9, Matthew A. Lunning9, Aliyah R. Sohani10, Benjamin J. 8 Chen11, Shannon Buckley12, Loretta J. Nastoupil1, R. Eric Davis1, Jason R. Westin1, Nathan H. 9 Fowler1, Samir Parekh8, Maher K. Gandhi7, Sattva S. Neelapu1, Douglas Stewart5, Javeed 10 Iqbal2, Timothy Greiner2, Scott J. Rodig13, Adnan Mansoor5, Michael R. Green1,14,15* 11 1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD 12 Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; 2Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of 13 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; 3Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied 14 Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; 4Department of Pathology and 15 Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; 5Section of Hematology, Department of 16 Medicine, University
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTORS Overview:- The completion of the Human Genome Project allowed the identification of a large family of proteins with a common motif of seven groups of 20-24 hydrophobic amino acids arranged as α-helices. Approximately 800 of these seven transmembrane (7TM) receptors have been identified of which over 300 are non-olfactory receptors (see Frederikson et al., 2003; Lagerstrom and Schioth, 2008). Subdivision on the basis of sequence homology allows the definition of rhodopsin, secretin, adhesion, glutamate and Frizzled receptor families. NC-IUPHAR recognizes Classes A, B, and C, which equate to the rhodopsin, secretin, and glutamate receptor families. The nomenclature of 7TM receptors is commonly used interchangeably with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), although the former nomenclature recognises signalling of 7TM receptors through pathways not involving G proteins. For example, adiponectin and membrane progestin receptors have some sequence homology to 7TM receptors but signal independently of G-proteins and appear to reside in membranes in an inverted fashion compared to conventional GPCR. Additionally, the NPR-C natriuretic peptide receptor has a single transmembrane domain structure, but appears to couple to G proteins to generate cellular responses. The 300+ non-olfactory GPCR are the targets for the majority of drugs in clinical usage (Overington et al., 2006), although only a minority of these receptors are exploited therapeutically. Signalling through GPCR is enacted by the activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins), made up of α, β and γ subunits, where the α and βγ subunits are responsible for signalling. The α subunit (tabulated below) allows definition of one series of signalling cascades and allows grouping of GPCRs to suggest common cellular, tissue and behavioural responses.
    [Show full text]
  • ANALYSIS Doi:10.1038/Nature14663
    ANALYSIS doi:10.1038/nature14663 Universal allosteric mechanism for Ga activation by GPCRs Tilman Flock1, Charles N. J. Ravarani1*, Dawei Sun2,3*, A. J. Venkatakrishnan1{, Melis Kayikci1, Christopher G. Tate1, Dmitry B. Veprintsev2,3 & M. Madan Babu1 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) allosterically activate heterotrimeric G proteins and trigger GDP release. Given that there are 800 human GPCRs and 16 different Ga genes, this raises the question of whether a universal allosteric mechanism governs Ga activation. Here we show that different GPCRs interact with and activate Ga proteins through a highly conserved mechanism. Comparison of Ga with the small G protein Ras reveals how the evolution of short segments that undergo disorder-to-order transitions can decouple regions important for allosteric activation from receptor binding specificity. This might explain how the GPCR–Ga system diversified rapidly, while conserving the allosteric activation mechanism. proteins bind guanine nucleotides and act as molecular switches almost 30 A˚ away from the GDP binding region5 and allosterically trig- in a number of signalling pathways by interconverting between ger GDP release to activate them. 1,2 G a GDP-bound inactive and a GTP-bound active state . They The high-resolution structure of the Gas-bound b2-adrenergic recep- 3 5 consist of two major classes: monomeric small G proteins and hetero- tor (b2AR) provided crucial insights into the receptor–G protein inter- trimeric G proteins4. While small G proteins and the a-subunit (Ga)of face and conformational changes in Ga upon receptor binding6,7. Recent 6 8 heterotrimeric G proteins both contain a GTPase domain (G-domain), studies described dynamic regions in Gas and Gai , the importance of ˚ Ga contains an additional helical domain (H-domain) and also forms a displacement of helix 5 (H5) of Gas and Gat by up to 6 A into the complex with the Gb and Gc subunits.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of Potential Genes and Transcription Factors Of
    ANIMAL STUDY e-ISSN 1643-3750 © Med Sci Monit, 2018; 24: 503-510 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.907445 Received: 2017.10.08 Accepted: 2018.01.01 Screening of Potential Genes and Transcription Published: 2018.01.25 Factors of Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction via Bioinformatics Methods Authors’ Contribution: ABE 1 Yafeng Wang 1 Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical Study Design A AB 1 Ailan Huang University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China Data Collection B 2 Department of Gynecology, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Statistical Analysis C BEF 1 Lixia Gan Region, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Data Interpretation D BCF 1 Yanli Bao Guangxi, P.R. China Manuscript Preparation E BDF 1 Weilin Zhu 3 Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical Literature Search F University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R. China Funds Collection G EF 1 Yanyan Hu AE 1 Li Ma CF 2 Shiyang Wei DE 3 Yuyan Lan Corresponding Author: Yafeng Wang, e-mail: [email protected] Source of support: Departmental sources Background: The aim of this study was to explore the potential genes and transcription factors involved in postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) via bioinformatics analysis. Material/Methods: GSE95070 miRNA expression profiles were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus database, which in- cluded five hippocampal tissues from POCD mice and controls. Moreover, the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) between the two groups were identified. In addition, the target genes of DEMs were predicted using Targetscan 7.1, followed by protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction, functional enrichment anal- ysis, pathway analysis, and prediction of transcription factors (TFs) targeting the potential targets.
    [Show full text]
  • GNAI3 Gene G Protein Subunit Alpha I3
    GNAI3 gene G protein subunit alpha i3 Normal Function The GNAI3 gene provides instructions for making one component, the inhibitory alpha subunit, of a protein complex called a guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein). G proteins are composed of three protein subunits: alpha, beta, and gamma. Each of these subunits is produced from a different gene. Through a process called signal transduction, G proteins trigger a complex network of signaling pathways within cells. These pathways help transmit information from outside the cell to inside the cell. Specifically, G proteins made with the GNAI3 inhibitory alpha subunit reduce (inhibit) the activity of an enzyme called adenylyl cyclase, which is an important chemical messenger within cells. G protein signaling ultimately influences many cell activities, instructing the cell to grow, divide, or take on specialized functions. Studies suggest that G protein signaling involving the GNAI3 inhibitory alpha subunit contributes to the development of the first and second pharyngeal arches. These embryonic structures ultimately develop into the jawbones, facial muscles, middle ear bones, ear canals, outer ears, and related tissues. Health Conditions Related to Genetic Changes Auriculo-condylar syndrome At least two mutations in the GNAI3 gene have been found to cause auriculo-condylar syndrome, a disorder that primarily affects the development of the ears and lower jaw ( mandible). The identified mutations change single protein building blocks (amino acids) in the inhibitory alpha subunit. These mutations likely alter the structure of the inhibitory alpha subunit and impair G protein signaling. Abnormal signaling alters the formation of the lower jaw: instead of developing normally, the lower jaw becomes shaped more like the smaller upper jaw (maxilla).
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Regulator of G Protei
    Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Alters the Expression of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins in Dendritic Cells: Implications for G Protein-Coupled Receptor This information is current as Signaling of September 29, 2021. Geng-Xian Shi, Kathleen Harrison, Sang-Bae Han, Chantal Moratz and John H. Kehrl J Immunol 2004; 172:5175-5184; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.9.5175 Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/content/172/9/5175 References This article cites 49 articles, 26 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/ http://www.jimmunol.org/content/172/9/5175.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists by guest on September 29, 2021 • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Toll-Like Receptor Signaling Alters the Expression of Regulator of G Protein Signaling Proteins in Dendritic Cells: Implications for G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Geng-Xian Shi,1 Kathleen Harrison,1 Sang-Bae Han,1 Chantal Moratz, and John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Stearic Acid Blunts Growth-Factor Signaling Via Oleoylation of GNAI Proteins
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24844-9 OPEN Stearic acid blunts growth-factor signaling via oleoylation of GNAI proteins Hana Nůsková 1,2, Marina V. Serebryakova 3,5, Anna Ferrer-Caelles 1,2,5, Timo Sachsenheimer4, Christian Lüchtenborg4, Aubry K. Miller 1, Britta Brügger 4, Larisa V. Kordyukova 3 & ✉ Aurelio A. Teleman 1,2 Covalent attachment of C16:0 to proteins (palmitoylation) regulates protein function. Pro- 1234567890():,; teins are also S-acylated by other fatty acids including C18:0. Whether protein acylation with different fatty acids has different functional outcomes is not well studied. We show here that C18:0 (stearate) and C18:1 (oleate) compete with C16:0 to S-acylate Cys3 of GNAI proteins. C18:0 becomes desaturated so that C18:0 and C18:1 both cause S-oleoylation of GNAI. Exposure of cells to C16:0 or C18:0 shifts GNAI acylation towards palmitoylation or oleoy- lation, respectively. Oleoylation causes GNAI proteins to shift out of cell membrane detergent-resistant fractions where they potentiate EGFR signaling. Consequently, exposure of cells to C18:0 reduces recruitment of Gab1 to EGFR and reduces AKT activation. This provides a molecular mechanism for the anti-tumor effects of C18:0, uncovers a mechanistic link how metabolites affect cell signaling, and provides evidence that the identity of the fatty acid acylating a protein can have functional consequences. 1 German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. 2 Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. 3 A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico- Chemical Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia. 4 Heidelberg University Biochemistry Center (BZH), Heidelberg, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Transcriptional Mechanisms Downstream of Nf1 Gene Defeciency in Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Daochun Sun Wayne State University
    Wayne State University DigitalCommons@WayneState Wayne State University Dissertations 1-1-2012 Identification of transcriptional mechanisms downstream of nf1 gene defeciency in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors Daochun Sun Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Sun, Daochun, "Identification of transcriptional mechanisms downstream of nf1 gene defeciency in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors" (2012). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 558. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. IDENTIFICATION OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL MECHANISMS DOWNSTREAM OF NF1 GENE DEFECIENCY IN MALIGNANT PERIPHERAL NERVE SHEATH TUMORS by DAOCHUN SUN DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2012 MAJOR: MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND GENETICS Approved by: _______________________________________ Advisor Date _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY DAOCHUN SUN 2012 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my parents and my wife Ze Zheng for their continuous support and understanding during the years of my education. I could not achieve my goal without them. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express tremendous appreciation to my mentor, Dr. Michael Tainsky. His guidance and encouragement throughout this project made this dissertation come true. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Raymond Mattingly and Dr. John Reiners Jr. for their sustained attention to this project during the monthly NF1 group meetings and committee meetings, Dr.
    [Show full text]