DOCSLIB.ORG

Gregg Township Zoning Ordinance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gregg Township Zoning Ordinance GREGG TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE July 7, 2014 Edition ZONING ORDINANCE for GREGG TOWNSHIP UNION COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Adopted 1968 Amendments: July 13, 1998 May 5, 2008 (Ordinance 2008-01) May 3, 2010 (Ordinance 2010-02) November 1, 2010 (Ordinance 2010-03) March 7, 2011 (Ordinance 2011-01) July 5, 2011 (Ordinance 2011-02) May 6, 2013 (Ordinance 2013-02) July 7, 2014 (Ordinance 2014-01) Gregg Township Supervisors David Masser, Chairman/Roadmaster Gloria Munsell, Vice Chairman Michael Keiser, Supervisor Jodi Willow, Secretary Treasurer Brian Kerstetter, Solicitor Gregg Township Planning Commission Gregg Township Zoning Hearing Board Thomas Snoddy, Chairman Terry Snoddy Dan King, Vice Chairman Janet Sellard Jodi Willow, Secretary Dayne Foresman Ken Kipp, Treasurer Martin Wilson, Solicitor Gary Umstead Ryan Runkle Prepared By: Douglas Hovey, Planning Consultant In Conjunction with the Gregg Township Planning Commission and the Gregg Township Supervisors Zoning Map and Cover Map Prepared by the Union County Geographical Information Systems Department Gregg Township, Union County 18084 Russell Rd. Allenwood, PA 17810 570-538-5499 Fax 570-538-9438 Email: [email protected] www.greggtwp.org Key: P - Permitted Use SE – Special Exception Use CU - Conditional Use Gregg Township Schedule of Uses Zoning Districts Uses WP A RR V C I CM See Article: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Accessory Uses/Structures P P P P P P P Adult Uses CU Agricultural Business P P P Agricultural Operation CU Agriculture P P P P P Animal Hospital SE SE SE Automotive Car Wash, Repair, Sales or Service Facility P P Bed & Breakfast P P P P Clubs & Lodges P P P Communications Antenna, Equipment Building P P P CU P P P Communications Tower CU CU CU CU CU CU Cultivation of Crops P P P P P P P Day Care Center P SE P P Essential Services (no zoning permit req’d) P P P P P P P Family Based Group Home P P P P P P P Family Day Care Home P P P P P P P Forestry Activities (no zoning permit req’d) P P P P P P P Group Care Facility P Home Occupation P P P P P P P Hospital/Drug and Alcohol Treatment Facility/Rehabilitation Center P Industrial Park SE Institutions/Correctional Facility P Junkyard SE Kennel SE Manufacturing, Research and Testing Laboratories P P Medical Offices, Clinic, Surgery Center CU P CU Mobile Home Park SE Multiple Family Dwelling SE Municipal Uses P Municipal Utility Facility P Neighborhood Retail SE SE SE No Impact Home Based Business P P P P P P P Nursing or Retirement Home, Assisted Living Facility SE SE Planned Residential Development SE SE Professional Office P P P P P Professional Office Group SE SE P P P Public and Quasi –Public Use SE SE SE SE SE SE SE Recreation, Indoor including Entertainment Facility, Museum P P Recreation, Outdoor including Camp or Campground Use, Hunting Club SE SE Restaurant, Hotel or Motel, Convenience Market P P Retail, Banks, Wholesale, Printing or Non-Automotive Service or Repair Business P P Self Storage Facility SE SE P P Shopping Center SE SE Single Family Dwelling, Seasonal Dwelling P P P P Surface Mining SE SE Trucking or Rail Terminal/Intermodal Freight Facility P Two-Family Dwelling P Townhouses SE Warehousing, Distribution Center P P Waste Storage or Processing Facility SE Wind Energy Facility CU Zoo, Zoological Garden, Aquarium SE Zoning Districts: WP – Woodland Preservation A – Agriculture CM – Commercial Manufacturing RR – Rural Residential V – Village C – Commercial I – Institutional Schedule of Uses -iii- Adopted May 6, 2013 GREGG TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE Table of Contents Schedule of Uses ........................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... iv ARTICLE 1 - General Provisions 1.1 Authority......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Short Title....................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Effective Date ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.4 Purpose............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.5 Community Development Objectives........................................................................... 1-2 1.6 Interpretation ................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.7 Establishment of Controls............................................................................................. 1-2 1.7.1 Minimum and Uniform Regulations 1.7.2 For New Uses and Structures 1.7.3 For Existing Uses and Structures 1.7.4 Types of Controls 1.8 Application of Regulations............................................................................................ 1-3 1-9 Severability ..................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.10 Conflicts .......................................................................................................................... 1-4 1.11.1 Repeal 1.11.2 Relation To State Law 1.11 Disclaimer of Liability................................................................................................... 1-4 1.12 Amendment to Prior Ordinance................................................................................... 1-5 1.13 Effective Date ................................................................................................................. 1-5 ARTICLE 2 - Definitions 2.1 Applicability and Interpretation .................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Definition of Terms........................................................................................................ 2-1 -iv- ARTICLE 3 – Establishment of Zoning Districts and Zoning Map 3.1 Names and Purposes Of Zoning Districts.................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Zoning District Maps..................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 Adoption of Official Zoning Map 3.2.2 Copies of Zoning Map 3.2.3 Zoning District Boundary Lines 3.2.4 Interpretation of Boundaries ARTICLE 4 – Woodland Preservation District 4.1 Purpose of the Woodland Preservation District ......................................................... 4-1 4.2 Use Regulations for the Woodland Preservation District .......................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Permitted Uses 4.2.2 Special Exception Uses 4.2.3 Conditional Uses 4.3 Height and Coverage Requirements ........................................................................... 4-2 4.4 Minimum Areas and Dimensions ................................................................................ 4-2 4.5 Limitations With Respect to Development Uses in the Woodland Preservation District ................................................................................... 4-2 4.6 Subdivision Plan Considerations for the Woodland Preservation District.............. 4-3 ARTICLE 5 – Agriculture District 5.1 Purpose of the Agriculture District.............................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Use Regulations for the Agriculture District............................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Permitted Uses 5.2.2 Special Exception Uses 5.2.3 Conditional Uses 5.3 Height and Coverage Requirements ........................................................................... 5-2 5.4 Agriculture District Areas and Dimensions ................................................................ 5-2 5.5 Limitations With Respect to Non Agricultural Development Uses in the Agriculture District........................................................................................................ 5-4 5.6 Subdivision Plan Considerations in the Agriculture District .................................... 5-5 ARTICLE 6 – Rural Residential District 6.1 Purpose of the Rural Residential District.................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Use Regulations for the Rural Residential District..................................................... 6-1 6.2.1 Permitted Uses -v- 6.2.2 Special Exception Uses 6.2.3 Conditional Uses 6.3 Density, Height and Coverage Requirements ........................................................... 6-2 6.4 Minimum Areas and Dimensions ................................................................................ 6-2 ARTICLE 7 – Village District 7.1 Purpose of the Village District...................................................................................... 7-1 7.2 Use Regulations for the Village District....................................................................... 7-1 7.2.1 Permitted Uses 7.2.2 Special Exception Uses 7.2.3 Conditional Uses 7.3 Height and Coverage Requirements ........................................................................... 7-2 7.4 Minimum Areas and Dimensions ................................................................................ 7-2 ARTICLE 8 – Commercial District 8.1 Purpose of the Commercial District............................................................................. 8-1 8.2 Use Regulations for the Commercial District.............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus & Motorcoach News
    May 1, 2007 WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE BUS INDUSTRY Transit agencies lambaste charter rules proposal WASHINGTON — Disgrunt- Most of the rest are from pri- for public transit agencies, which While the formal comments led pubic transit operators from vate motorcoach operators who have been the subject of much con- filed by the transit agencies with Charter comments across the country have inundated also have an important stake in the troversy and disputes between pri- the FTA zeroed in on a number of the Federal Transit Administration rules that regulate the type of char- vate and public carriers. issues, their harshest words were available on Web with complaints about the agency’s ters public transit systems can pro- Many of the measures in the directed at the definition of charter WASHINGTON — Upwards of proposed charter bus regulations. vide. proposal came from a joint com- service, which they said would 300 letters, many of them 6-to-10 Of the nearly 300 letters and “We’ve got our work cut out for mittee of representatives of public severely limit their ability to pro- pages long, have been sent to the messages sent to the federal agency us,” noted an FTA attorney who transit operators and private vide shuttle service for many of the Federal Transit Administration, com- in response to its call for comments will help review the materials motorcoach carriers who took part community events that take place menting on its proposed rules for on the proposed rules changes, received during the two-month in a series of negotiated-rule-mak- in their communities each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Mar.-Apr.2020 Highlites
    Prospect Senior Center 6 Center Street Prospect, CT 06712 (203)758-5300 (203)758-3837 Fax Lucy Smegielski Mar.-Apr.2020 Director - Editor Municipal Agent Highlites Town of Prospect STAFF Lorraine Lori Susan Lirene Melody Matt Maglaris Anderson DaSilva Lorensen Heitz Kalitta From the Director… Dear Members… I believe in being upfront and addressing things head-on. Therefore, I am using this plat- form to address some issues that have come to my attention. Since the cost for out-of-town memberships to our Senior Center went up in January 2020, there have been a few miscon- ceptions that have come to my attention. First and foremost, the one rumor that I would definitely like to address is the story going around that the Prospect Town Council raised the dues of our out-of-town members because they are trying to “get rid” of the non-residents that come here. The story goes that the Town Council is trying to keep our Senior Center strictly for Prospect residents only. Nothing could be further from the truth. I value the out-of-town members who come here. I feel they have contributed significantly to the growth of our Senior Center. Many of these members run programs here and volun- teer in a number of different capacities. They are my lifeline and help me in ways that I could never repay them for. I and the Town Council members would never want to “get rid” of them. I will tell you point blank why the Town Council decided to raise membership dues for out- of-town members.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Analysis of a Potential Mbta Fare Increase
    TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: IMPACT ANALYSIS OF A POTENTIAL MBTA FARE INCREASE Prepared for Dennis A. DiZoglio, MBTA Asst. General Manager for Planning and Real Estate Prepared by Clinton S7Bench, Manager Transit Service Planning Contributing Staff Vijay Mahal Thomas Hum hrey Jonathan BelcR er Rama Karamalaputi Grace King Central Transportation Planning Staff Directed by the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is composed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments August 27,2003 INTRODUCTION CTPS has conducted a Fare Increase Impacts Analysis to assist the MBTA Board of Directors in determining the following impacts of the proposed 2004 fare increase: Revenue and Ridership Impacts -- Q- Air Quality Impacts Environmental Justice Impacts Service Reductions In Lieu of a Fare Increase This memorandum will describe our findings on each of these issues in the sections below. Substantial portions of this text were provided by Vijay Mahal, Manager of Transportation Systems Analysis, and Thomas J. Humphrey and Jonathan Belcher, both of the Transit Service Planning Group. REVENUE AND RIDERSHIP IMPACTS Explanation of Fare Elasticity Fares are one of many factors that influence the level of ridership on transit services. Fare elasticity is the measure of the expected or observed rate of change in ridership relative to a change in fares if all other factors remain constant. For example, an elasticity of -0.3 indicates that for every 1%increase in fares, a ridership decrease of 0.3% would be expected. Conversely, with the same elasticity a 1%fare reduction would be expected to increase ridership by 0.3%. Ridership and revenue changes for each mode as the result of a fare increase are calculated using the following formulas: 1) A ridership = ridership ,,, x elasticity factor x O/o increase in fare + 100 2) A revenue = (ridership ,,, + A ridership) x new fare - (ridership ,,, x old fare) For example, with an initial ridership of 1,000 passengers a day and a fare of $1.00, revenue would be $1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transit Office Department of Transportation State of Florida
    7/28/2017 5:19:20 PM TRANSIT FACILITIES GUIDELINES Department ofTransportation Public TransitOffice State ofFlorida STREETSIDE BUSSTOP LOCATIONS TRANSIT FACILITIESGUIDELINES & DESIGN TYPES SHEET CS NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS STREETSIDE BUS STOP LOCATIONS & DESIGN TYPES 1 of 41 STREETSIDE COMBINATION BUS STOP LOCATIONS 2 of 41 BUS STOP LOCATION RELATIVE TO ACCESS POINTS 3 of 41 BUS STOP LOCATION RELATIVE TO RAILROAD CROSSING 4 of 41 BUS STOP LANDING PADS AND SIGNAGE 5 of 41 BUS SHELTER DETAILS 6 of 41 CLOSED BUS BAY LAYOUT URBAN/CURB & GUTTER 7 of 41 CLOSED BUS BAY LAYOUT RURAL/SHOULDER 8 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS FACILITY DECISION TREE 9 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS STOPS 10 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS BAYS WITH ON STREET PARKING 11 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS BAYS WITH RIGHT TURN LANE 12 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS BAYS/STOPS 13 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS BAYS/STOPS 14 of 41 FAR SIDE BUS FACILITY DECISION TREE 15 of 41 FAR SIDE BUS BAYS WITH RIGHT TURN LANE 16 of 41 FAR SIDE CLOSED BUS BAYS WITH RIGHT TURN LANE 17 of 41 FAR SIDE NUB/BULB WITH ON STREET PARKING 18 of 41 FAR SIDE BUS BAYS 19 of 41 FAR SIDE BUS BAYS/STOPS 20 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS FACILITY DECISION TREE 21 of 41 MID-BLOCK DETAILS 22 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS STOPS WITH ON STREET PARKING 23 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS BAYS/STOPS 24 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS BAYS/STOPS 25 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS STOPS 26 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS BAYS/STOPS 27 of 41 NEAR SIDE BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 28 of 41 FAR SIDE BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 29 of 41 MID-BLOCK BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 30 of 41 NEAR SIDE ISOLATED BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 31 of 41 FAR SIDE ISOLATED BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 32 of 41 MID-BLOCK ISOLATED BUS STOP LOCATION ADJACENT TO CANAL 33 of 41 BOARDING AND ALIGHTING AREA DETAIL 34 of 41 BOARDING AND ALIGHTING AREA DETAIL 35 of 41 OFF STREET HALF SAW TOOTH BUS BAY 36 of 41 CONCURRENT FLOW BUS LANES MID-BLOCK 37 of 41 CONTRA-FLOW BUS LANES MID-BLOCK 38 of 41 BUSWAY MID-BLOCK 39 of 41 EXCLUSIVE BUSWAY 40 of 41 BUS-ON-SHOULDER OPERATIONS UNIT ERUPTED FLOW HIGHWAY 41 of 41 M P 8 4 : 9 1 : 5 7 1 0 2 / 8 2 / 7 SHEET NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Th E V O Lvo G Ro U P 2 0
    THE VOLVO GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2012 The V olvo olvo G roup 2012 TOGETHER WE MOVE THE WORLD www.volvogroup.com A Global Group 2 CEO comment TOGETHER WE MOVE THE OperatiNG coNteXT 4 Future transport needs StrategY 8 Strategic approach BUsiNess model 22 Product offering WORLD 28 World-class services 30 A high-performing organization Without the products and services of the Volvo 32 Industrial structure Group the societies where many of us live 34 Production 35 Responsible sourcing would not function. Like lifeblood, our trucks, GroUP PerformaNce buses, engines and construction equipment are 36 Global strength involved in many of the functions that most of 38 Development by continent − Europe us rely on every day. 40 Focus new Volvo FH 42 Development by continent − North America For instance, one in seven meals eaten in 44 Development by continent − South America Europe reaches the consumers thanks to trucks 46 Focus Peru 48 Development by continent − Asia from the Volvo Group rolling on the roads of the 50 Focus Dongfeng continent. Buses are the most common type of 52 Focus Africa public transportation in the world, helping many Board of Directors’ report people to reach work, school, vacations, friends 56 Significant events and family. If all the Volvo buses in the world were 58 Trucks to start at the same time, they would transport 60 Buses more than 10 million people. Our construction 62 Construction equipment 64 Volvo Penta machines are used when building roads, houses, 66 Volvo Financial Services hospitals, airports, railroads, factories, offices, 68 Financial management shopping centers and recreational facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Transportation on Long Island
    Access to Transportation on Long Island Technical Report Prepared by: In association with: Abrams-Cherwony & Associates Eng-Wong, Taub & Associates Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates April 2007 Access to Transportation on Long Island Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 2.0 Existing Conditions...................................................................................................................3 2.1 Demographic Analysis.................................................................................................... 3 2.1.1 Population Density ..................................................................................................... 3 2.1.2 Transit-Supportive Areas............................................................................................ 6 2.1.3 Target Markets ........................................................................................................... 8 Senior Citizens.................................................................................................................... 8 Persons with Disabilities ..................................................................................................... 8 Youth................................................................................................................................... 8 Households Without Automobiles ......................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines
    Minnesota Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines ESO INN TA D M E N P O I A T R A T T M R E O N P T S OF TRAN Minnesota Department of Transportation June 1996 JUNE 17, 1996 BIKEWAYS MANUAL summary CHAPTER SUMMARY CHAPTER TITLE 1 INTRODUCTION 2 DESIGN FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE 3 THE BICYCLE NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS 4 ON-ROAD DESIGNS 5 PATHS 6 BRIDGES AND GRADE SEPARATIONS 7 TRAFFIC CONTROLS 8 BICYCLE PARKING JUNE 17, 1996 BIKEWAYS MANUAL contents (1) Chapter One INTRODUCTION 1-1.0 PURPOSE 1-2.0 POLICY AND GOALS 1-3.0 SCOPE 1-4.0 DEFINITIONS 1-5.0 THE TYPICAL BICYCLE, RIDER, AND DIMENSIONS 1-6.0 OPERATING SPACE 1-7.0 THE DESIGN BICYCLE 1-8.0 DESIGN APPROACH Chapter Two DESIGN FACTORS AND MAINTENANCE 2-1.0 GENERAL 2-2.0 SURFACE QUALITY AND UTILITY WORK 2-3.0 VEGETATION CONTROL Chapter Three THE BICYCLE NETWORK PLANNING PROCESS 3-1.0 GENERAL 3-2.0 DEVELOPING A COMMUNITY BICYCLE NETWORK PLAN 3-2.01 Establish Performance Criteria for the Bicycle Network 3-2.02 Inventory Existing System 3-2.03 Identify Bicycle Travel Corridors 3-2.04 Evaluate and Select Specific Route Alternatives 3-2.05 Design Treatments 3-2.05.01 Select Appropriate Facility Options 3-2.05.02 Factors Used to Determine Grade Separations (Tunnels and Bridges) 3-2.06 Evaluate the Finished Network Plan Using the Established Performance Criteria 3-2.07 Bicycle Parking and Security Chapter Four ON-ROAD DESIGNS 4-1.0 GENERAL 4-2.0 TYPES OF FACILITIES 4-2.01 Bicycle Lanes 4-2.02 Bicycles, Buses and Combination Bus/Bike Lanes contents (2) BIKEWAYS MANUAL JUNE 17, 1996 4-2.03
    [Show full text]
  • BUS RAPID TRANSIT PHASE II: Public Input
    BUS RAPID TRANSIT PHASE II: Public Input • TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i CHAPTER 1 | WORKSHOP PURPOSE AND STRUCTURE 1 CHAPTER 2 | WORKSHOP FINDINGs 9 CHAPTER 3 | ONLINE BRT SURVEY FINDINGS 26 APPENDIX A | LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS & ELECTED OFFICIALS REPRESENTED AT THE WORKSHOPS 42 June 2010 BUS RAPID TRANSIT PHASE II: PUBLIC INPUT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the fall of 2008, the New York City Department of Trans- guided each group through a discussion of potential BRT portation (DOT) and MTA New York City Transit (NYCT) be- corridors and of BRT features, such as off-board fare pay- gan exploring opportunities for the expansion of Bus Rapid ment, real-time bus arrival information, transit signal prior- Transit (BRT) in New York City. Public input is a critical ity, and bus lanes and busways. Each participant filled out component of this effort, and so in the spring of 2009 DOT a questionnaire over the course of the workshop and note and NYCT sought to engage New Yorkers in a dialogue on takers captured comments at each table. The online survey the future of BRT. This effort included seven public work- followed a similar format and also provided the opportunity shops across the city and an online survey, the goals of for open-ended responses. which were to: Summary of Public Comments • Educate the public about BRT and current Overall, the workshops and survey indicated that the pub- BRT projects; lic is supportive of BRT expansion and other bus improve- • Solicit feedback on unmet transit needs that ments and feels that these initiatives will improve transit may be appropriate for BRT; and, service in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Rail No302 1977
    "- ~ Rail c:;.. " ~-~ - ~ MARCH19~ No. 302 '" J A 194 3 scene on Beau bien Street as t rol l ey coach no. ~005 is loadi ng at the curb . This first group of coach was ori ginally painted pale ye l low with green tr im . Photo courtesy HUe TC trans i t commission Hr . J.G. Cham be rlan. J!I :larch 23 , 1':1 53 in no r th central tl o n treal a ty pic a l day , children ~I pl ayin g . rows of dup lexes and trolleybusses . Th e ov e r he ad wires ha ve long d i sappeared as ha s K. T.C. 4029 whic h is now plying th e s t reets of Mexico City. Photo courtesy MUC TC trans it com­ ~fss l on Hr. J.G , Ch ambe rlan . Montreal~ last JrQ~leys PHOTOS BY THE AUTHOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED (From time to time, CANADIAN RAIL pre­ sented articles on the various classes of streetcars that dominated the streets of Montreal until 1959. The following is a brief illustrated account of an­ other type of electric surface transit vehicle, this one with two trolley poles, that survived the railborne vehicle for another seven years in the Canadian metropolis). The Montreal Tramways Company inaugurated trolley coach service on the BEAUBIEN line on March 29th, 1937, replacing a bus route started on December 7th, 1931. Trolley wire was installed, and seven English-built AEC/MCW units purchased to provide the basic service; gasoline buses supplemented the electrics in rush hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Transit Questions
    Hofstra University Top 10 Transit Questions 1. What Long Island Rail Road stations are near Hofstra University? The Hempstead and Mineola LIRR stations are both near Hofstra University. Hofstra provides shuttle service to and from both stations and campus. 2. What buses stop near Hofstra? Eight routes run by Nassau County Inter-County Express (NICE) serve Hofstra University. Following is a list of these routes and the communities served. Route Serving N16 Roosevelt Field, Garden City, Uniondale, Hempstead Transit Center, South Hempstead, Rockville Centre, Rockville Centre LIRR N27 Hempstead, Hempstead Transit Center, Roosevelt Field, Carle Place, East Williston, Albertson, Roslyn, East Hills, Greenvale, Glen Head, Sea Cliff, Glen Cove N43 Freeport, Roosevelt, Uniondale, Nassau Coliseum, Hofstra University, NCC, Roosevelt Field N48 Hempstead, Hempstead Transit Center, Uniondale, East Meadow, Levittown, Westbury, Hicksville N49 Hempstead, Hempstead Transit Center, Uniondale, East Meadow, Levittown, Westbury, Hicksville N70 Hempstead Transit Center, Hempstead, Uniondale, East Meadow, Levittown, Plainedge, Farmingdale N71 Hempstead Transit Center, Hempstead, Uniondale, East Meadow, Levittown, Plainedge, Farmingdale, Massapequa Park, Sunrise Mall N72 Hempstead Transit Center, Hempstead, Uniondale, East Meadow, Levittown, Plainedge, Farmingdale Hofstra University Top 10 Transit Questions 3. What fare options are available for LIRR and NICE Bus? Are there discounts available to college students? While there are no discounts available specifically for college students, the Ten Trip Off- Peak is LIRR’s best buy for off-peak travel to NYC. Save up to 15% off the price of 10 off-peak one-way fares. The MTA eTix mobile ticketing app can also be used to purchase LIRR tickets. Additional information is available at http://www.mta.info/mta-eTix-promo The NICE Bus cash fare is $2.75.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Management Program Rules and Regulations
    SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BUS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RULES AND REGULATIONS New Jersey Administrative Code N.J.A.C. 19:75-1 et seq. EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 16, 2009 REGULATIONS OF THE SOUTH JERSEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SJTA) NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 19:75-1 et seq. CHAPTER TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUBCHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS....................................................1 19:75-1.1 Definitions 19:75-1.2 Exempt buses 19:75-1.3 (Reserved) 19:75-1.4 (Reserved) 19:75-1.5 (Reserved) 19:75-1.6 (Reserved) SUBCHAPTER 2 ROUTES OF TRAVEL.........................................................3 19:75-2.1 Routes of travel; generally 19:75-2.2 Atlantic County and Atlantic City access routes 19:75-2.3 Routes of travel to and from casino hotels, Atlantic City Convention Hall (Boardwalk facility), the Atlantic City Rail Terminal/the new Atlantic City Convention Center/Sheraton Hotel, Atlantic City International Airport, Authority approved bus parking facilities, major tourist destinations and other major traffic generators SUBCHAPTER 3 APPLICATIONS, APPROVALS AND FEES..................11 19:75-3.1 Approval required 19:75-3.2 Applications; general requirements; fees 19:75-3.3 Impact Statement 19:75-3.4 Certificates for approved facilities; general; renewals 19:75-3.5 Activity center application requirements 19:75-3.6 Certificate for bus maintenance facility 19:75-3.7 Bus maintenance facility application requirements 19:75-3.8 Certificate for bus maintenance facility 19:75-3.9 Bus parking facility application requirements 19:75-3.10
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 33: Transit-Friendly Streets: Design and Traffic
    T RANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Report 33 Transit-Friendly Streets: Design and Traffic Management Strategies to Support Livable Communities Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1998 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIR OFFICERS MICHAEL S. TOWNES Peninsula Transportation Dist. Comm. Chairwoman: Sharon D. Banks, General Manager, AC Transit Vice Chairman: Wayne Shackelford, Commissioner, Georgia Department of Transportation MEMBERS Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board GORDON AOYAGI Montgomery County Government SHARON D. BANKS MEMBERS AC Transit LEE BARNES THOMAS F. BARRY, JR., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation Barwood, Inc. BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor, Bruton Center for Development Studies, GERALD L. BLAIR University of Texas at Dallas Indiana County Transit Authority SARAH C. CAMPBELL, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, DC SHIRLEY A. DeLIBERO E. DEAN CARLSON, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Corporation JOANNE F. CASEY, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, MD ROD J. DIRIDON JOHN W. FISHER, Director, ATLSS Engineering Research Center, Lehigh University IISTPS GORMAN GILBERT, Director, Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State SANDRA DRAGGOO University CATA DELON HAMPTON, Chair and CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates, Washington, DC CONSTANCE GARBER LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, Civil Engineering, University of Virginia York County Community Action Corp. JAMES L. LAMMIE, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc., New York, NY ALAN J. GIBBS THOMAS F. LARWIN, General Manager, San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey BRADLEY L. MALLORY, Secretary of Transportation, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation DELON HAMPTON JEFFREY J.
    [Show full text]