DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations A/HRC/28/68/Add.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations A/HRC/28/68/Add.1 United Nations A/HRC/28/68/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 March 2015 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Juan E. Méndez Addendum Observations on communications transmitted to Governments and replies received* * The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only. GE.15-04417 (E) A/HRC/28/68/Add.1 Contents Paragraphs Page Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 4 I. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1–4 5 II. Observations by the Special Rapporteur ............................................................................... 5–664 5 Algeria ......................................................................................................................................... 5–9 5 Angola ......................................................................................................................................... 10–12 6 Argentina ................................................................................................................................... 13–15 7 Australia ................................................................................................................................... 16–31 7 Bahamas ................................................................................................................................... 32–34 10 Bahrain ....................................................................................................................................... 35–62 10 Bangladesh ................................................................................................................................. 63– 64 13 Belarus ......................................................................................................................................... 65–69 14 Brazil ......................................................................................................................................... 70–84 14 Brunei Darussalam ......................................................................................................................... 85–87 16 Cambodia ................................................................................................................................... 88–89 16 China ........................................................................................................................................... 90–111 17 Colombia ....................................................................................................................................... 112–115 19 Congo (Republic of the)................................................................................................................. 117–120 20 Cuba ........................................................................................................................................... 121–126 21 Cyprus ........................................................................................................................................... 127–133 22 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea ........................................................................................ 134–136 23 Democratic Republic of the Congo ................................................................................................ 137–138 24 Egypt ........................................................................................................................................... 139–170 25 El Salvador ............................................................................................................................... 171–172 29 Eritrea ............................................................................................................................... 173–176 29 Ethiopia ............................................................................................................................... 177–187 30 Equatorial Guinea ................................................................................................................... 188–189 32 Fiji ............................................................................................................................................... 190–191 32 Guatemala ...................................................................................................................................... 192–193 33 Honduras ........................................................................................................................................ 194–195 33 India ........................................................................................................................................... 196–203 33 Indonesia ........................................................................................................................................ 204–210 35 Iran (Islamic Republic of) ...................................................................................................... 211–263 36 Iraq ............................................................................................................................................. 264–267 46 Israel ........................................................................................................................................... 268–278 46 Italy ............................................................................................................................................. 279–280 48 Kazakhstan ................................................................................................................................. 281–283 48 2 A/HRC/28/68/Add.1 Kuwait ................................................................................................................................. 284–287 49 Kyrgyzstan ................................................................................................................................. 288–293 49 Libya ........................................................................................................................................... 294–368 50 Morocco ....................................................................................................................................... 369–382 64 Myanmar ..................................................................................................................................... 383–387 66 Nepal ........................................................................................................................................... 388–390 67 Nicaragua ................................................................................................................................... 391–399 67 Nigeria ............................................................................................................................... 400–403 69 Pakistan ..................................................................................................................................... 404–416 69 Panama ....................................................................................................................................... 417–424 71 Papua New Guinea ................................................................................................................... 425–430 72 Philippines ..................................................................................................................................... 431–434 74 Qatar ........................................................................................................................................... 435–440 74 Russian Federation ................................................................................................................... 441–457 75 Saudi Arabia ............................................................................................................................. 458–476 78 Serbia ........................................................................................................................................... 477–480 81 Spain ........................................................................................................................................... 481–486 82 Sri Lanka ................................................................................................................................... 487–490 83 Sudan ......................................................................................................................................... 491–500 84 Sweden ....................................................................................................................................... 501–504 85 Switzerland ............................................................................................................................... 505–509 85 Syrian Arab Republic .............................................................................................................. 510–524 86 Tajikistan ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guinea 2019 Human Rights Report
    GUINEA 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Guinea is a constitutional democratic republic in the early stages of democracy after decades of authoritarian rule. In 2015 President Alpha Conde won re-election with 58 percent of the vote. The election was generally regarded as free and fair. Legislative elections, last held in 2013 and scheduled for the end of 2018, have been delayed indefinitely. Municipal elections, originally scheduled for 2010, took place in February 2018. The elections were generally considered free and fair, despite allegations of fraud. Protests erupted throughout the country following the release of the results, and opposition parties alleged the ruling party, the Guinean People’s Assembly, conspired to commit voter fraud. The Ministry of Defense oversees the gendarmerie, and the Ministry of Security oversees the National Police. The gendarmerie and National Police share responsibility for internal security, but only the gendarmerie can arrest police or military officials. The army is responsible for external security but also has some domestic security responsibilities. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. Noteworthy human rights issues included: alleged torture by government security forces to extract confessions; arbitrary arrest and excessive use of force by government security personnel; significant problems with the independence of the judiciary; restrictions on free expression and the press; substantial interference with the rights of peaceful assembly and freedom of association; endemic corruption at all levels of government; frequent rape and violence against women and girls, which rarely led to prosecution; criminalization of same-sex sexual conduct; and forced labor, including forced child labor. Impunity by government authorities remained a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Erkenntnisliste Guinea
    GUINEA (Stand: 28. April 2021) Dem Gericht liegen folgende Auskünfte und Erkenntnisse vor, die für die Entscheidung von Bedeutung sein können: 2001 Amnesty International Jahresbericht 2001 Dt. Botschaft v. 04.01.2001 Behandlung von HIV, verfügbare Medikamente Auswärtiges Amt v. 24.1.2001 (- RPG, Behandlung in Haft, Rückkehrergefahren 36579) Auswärtiges Amt v. 14.02.2001 Behandelbarkeit psych. Erkrankungen, Kliniken, Hôpital National Donka Auswärtiges Amt v. 27.2.2001 (- Gefängnis Sureté/Conakry 37054) IAK v. 01.03.2001 RPG, Alpha Conde; Sippenhaft nicht auszuschließen; Waise; keine staatliche Unterstützung Auswärtiges Amt v. 09.3.2001 Versorgung von Gefängnisinsassen; Überwachung des (514-516.80/37397) Briefverkehrs mit dem Ausland Dt. Botschaft v. 09.03.2001 Behandelbarkeit von Hypertonie, keine Dialysemöglichkeit Dt. Botschaft v. 09.03.2001 verfügbare HIV-Medikamente Auswärtiges Amt v. 16.3.2001 (- Rückkehrgefahren 37054) Auswärtiges Amt v. 22.3.2001 (- zum Gefängnis Sureté/Conakry 36817) Auswärtiges Amt v. 28.3.2001 Macenta, Dialekt Toma; RPG; Sippenhaft, Waisen, keine 508(514)-516.80/37485 staatlichen Betreuungseinrichtungen Auswärtiges Amt v. 24.4.2001 Länderaufzeichnung Guinea (Stand: 21.02.2001) (303-303.12-GIN) Auswärtiges Amt v. 15.05.2001, Kommunalwahlen 1996 und 2000 508(514)-516.80/37486 IAK v. 21.05.2001 Unruhen 1993, PRP, Ethnie Peul Auswärtiges Amt v. 23.05.2001 Schülerproteste 12/99, Gymnasium Yimbaya (-37634) U.S. Department of State, Guinea: Report on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) or Female 01.06.2001 Genital Cutting (FGC) Auswärtiges Amt v. 16.08.2001, Lycee-Bonfi; keine Sippenhaft 508-516.80/38248 Auswärtiges Amt v. 8.11.2001 (- Rückkehrgefahren, UPR (insbes.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea SIGI 2019 Category Very High SIGI Value 2019 57%
    Country Guinea SIGI 2019 Category Very high SIGI Value 2019 57% Discrimination in the family 88% Legal framework on child marriage 100% Percentage of girls under 18 married 34% Legal framework on household responsibilities 100% Proportion of the population declaring that children will suffer if mothers are working outside home for a pay - Female to male ratio of time spent on unpaid care work 3.4 Legal framework on inheritance 75% Legal framework on divorce 100% Restricted physical integrity 57% Legal framework on violence against women 75% Proportion of the female population justifying domestic violence 92% Prevalence of domestic violence against women (lifetime) 80% Legal framework on female genital mutilation (FGM) 25% Share of women who think FGM should continue 67% Share of women who have undergone FGM 97% Sex ratio at birth (natural =105) 105 Legal framework on reproductive rights 50% Female population with unmet needs for family planning 28% Restricted access to productive and financial resources 28% Legal framework on working rights 100% Proportion of the population declaring this is not acceptable for a woman in their family to work outside home for a pay 10% Share of managers (male) 76% Legal framework on access to non-land assets 0% Share of house owners (male) 88% Legal framework on access to land assets 25% Share of agricultural land holders (male) 0% Legal framework on access to financial services 25% Share of account holders (male) 54% Restricted civil liberties 44% Legal framework on civil rights 100% Legal framework on freedom of movement 0% Percentage of women in the total number of persons not feeling safe walking alone at night 48% Legal framework on political participation 0% Share of the population that believes men are better political leaders than women - Percentage of male MP’s 78% Legal framework on access to justice 25% Share of women declaring lack of confidence in the justice system 43% Note: Higher values indicate higher inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea Country Report BTI 2016
    BTI 2016 | Guinea Country Report Status Index 1-10 5.08 # 80 of 129 Political Transformation 1-10 5.80 # 63 of 129 Economic Transformation 1-10 4.36 # 99 of 129 Management Index 1-10 5.83 # 36 of 129 scale score rank trend This report is part of the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) 2016. It covers the period from 1 February 2013 to 31 January 2015. The BTI assesses the transformation toward democracy and a market economy as well as the quality of political management in 129 countries. More on the BTI at http://www.bti-project.org. Please cite as follows: Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016 — Guinea Country Report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2016. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. BTI 2016 | Guinea 2 Key Indicators Population M 12.3 HDI 0.392 GDP p.c., PPP $ 1212.8 Pop. growth1 % p.a. 2.7 HDI rank of 187 179 Gini Index 33.7 Life expectancy years 56.1 UN Education Index 0.294 Poverty3 % 68.7 Urban population % 36.7 Gender inequality2 - Aid per capita $ 41.8 Sources (as of October 2015): The World Bank, World Development Indicators 2015 | UNDP, Human Development Report 2014. Footnotes: (1) Average annual growth rate. (2) Gender Inequality Index (GII). (3) Percentage of population living on less than $3.10 a day at 2011 international prices. Executive Summary Guinea’s tumultuous recent history continued with the outbreak of the Ebola epidemic, which began in Guinea itself. Not only did it kill thousands of Guineans, it also demonstrated the state’s initial inability to manage an emergency situation, and the deep dysfunctions of the health system.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyse De Situation Des Enfants En Guinée
    Analyse de Situation des Enfants en Guinée 2015 UNICEF Pays-Bas UNICEF Belgique UNICEF Suède Cofinancé par l’Union Européenne Analyse de Situation des Enfants en Guinée 2015 Auteur: Diallo Mamadou Alpha Avec le soutien de: Guirlene Frederic, UNICEF Guinée Maud Dominicy, UNICEF Belgique Jan-Jacob Muyls, UNICEF Belgique Majorie Kaandorp, UNICEF Pays-Bas Lise Pénisson, Bureau Européen d’Appui pour l’Asile (EASO) Graphisme: UNICEF Pays-Bas Imprimeur: Impress 2015 Pour plus d’informations, veuillez contacter : Majorie Kaandorp Chargée de la Défense des Droits de l’Enfant UNICEF Pays-Bas Tel: + 31 88 444 96 50 Email: [email protected] Cette analyse de situation a été rédigée par UNICEF Pays-Bas, UNICEF Belgique et UNICEF Suède dans le cadre du projet « Une meilleure information pour des solutions et une protection durables », qui est soutenu financièrement par le Fonds pour le Retour de la Commission Européenne. Le présent rapport n’engage que l’auteur, et la Commission Européenne ne saurait être tenue pour responsable de l’usage qui pourrait être fait des informations qu’il contient. Cofinancé par l’Union Européenne 2 Child notice Le projet “Une meilleure information pour des solutions et une protection durable”, adresse des analyses d’informations spécifiques aux enfants par pays (analyses de situation) qui sont les pays d’origine d’enfants en migration vers l’Europe. Les analyses de situation décrivent la situation des enfants dans leurs pays d’origine en fournissant des informations légales et pratiques sur l’éducation, les systèmes de santé, la protection de l’enfance, les conflits armés, la justice des mineurs, le trafic, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Sometimes Brutally
    “Human rights defenders have played an irreplaceable role in protecting victims and denouncing abuses. Their commitment Steadfast in Protest has exposed them to the hostility of dictatorships and the most repressive governments. […] This action, which is not only legitimate but essential, is too often hindered or repressed - Annual Report sometimes brutally. […] Much remains to be done, as shown in the 2006 Report [of the Observatory], which, unfortunately, continues to present grave violations aimed at criminalising Observatory for the Protection and imposing abusive restrictions on the activities of human 2006 of Human Rights Defenders rights defenders. […] I congratulate the Observatory and its two founding organisations for this remarkable work […]”. Mr. Kofi Annan Former Secretary General of the United Nations (1997 - 2006) The 2006 Annual Report of the Observatory for the Protection Steadfast in Protest of Human Rights Defenders (OMCT-FIDH) documents acts of Foreword by Kofi Annan repression faced by more than 1,300 defenders and obstacles to - FIDH OMCT freedom of association, in nearly 90 countries around the world. This new edition, which coincides with the tenth anniversary of the Observatory, pays tribute to these women and men who, every day, and often risking their lives, fi ght for law to triumph over arbitrariness. The Observatory is a programme of alert, protection and mobilisation, established by the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) in 1997. It aims to establish
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0104/2020 11.2.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 144 of the Rules of Procedure on Guinea Conakry, notably violence towards protesters (2020/2551(RSP)) Pierrette Herzberger-Fofana, Hannah Neumann, Michèle Rivasi, Henrike Hahn, Ernest Urtasun, Heidi Hautala on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Fabio Massimo Castaldo RE\P9_B(2020)0104_EN.docx PE647.541v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0104/2020 European Parliament resolution on Guinea Conakry, notably violence towards protesters (2020/2551(RSP)) The European Parliament, having regard to its previous resolutions on Guinea, most recently on 22 October 2009, having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, having regard to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights of 1981, having regard to the second revision of the Cotonou Agreement, having regard to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Guinea of 15th January 2020 having Regard the Joint Statement of the United Nations, the European Union and the Embassies of the United States and France in Guinea of 5 November 2019 having regard to the 11th European Development Fund National Indicative Programme for the period 2015-2020 allocating funds for Guinea having regard to the third session of political dialogue between the European Union and the Republic of Guinea under Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement, held on Wednesday 30 January 2019 having regard to the Constitution of Guinea, in particular its Title II on Fundamental rights, duties and freedoms; having regard to the Declaration of the Guinean organisation for the defence of human and citizens' rights of the 4th February 2020; having regard to Rule 144 of its Rules of Procedure A.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea 2018 Human Rights Report
    GUINEA 2018 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Guinea is a constitutional democratic republic in the early stages of a transition from decades of authoritarian rule. In 2015 President Alpha Conde won re- election with 58 percent of the vote. The election was generally regarded as free and fair. The last round of legislative elections was held in 2013 and regarded as free and fair. Municipal elections, originally scheduled for 2010, took place in February. The elections were generally considered free and fair, despite allegations of fraud. Protests erupted throughout the country following the release of the results, and opposition parties alleged the ruling party, the Guinean People’s Assembly, conspired to commit voter fraud. At year’s end, most elected officials had not assumed office. Despite tighter rules of engagement and a prohibition on the use of lethal force during street protests, elements of the security forces on occasion acted independently of civilian control. Human rights issues included use of excessive force against civilians by security forces; alleged torture by government security forces to extract confessions; arbitrary arrest by government security personnel; endemic corruption at all levels of government; frequent rape and violence against women and girls, which rarely led to prosecution; forced and early marriage; criminalization of same-sex sexual conduct; human trafficking; and forced labor, including forced child labor. Impunity by government authorities remained a problem. The government took minimal steps to prosecute or punish officials who committed abuses during the year or in years past. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Boosting the Media Sector for Greater Peace and Stability in Guinea-Bissau”
    EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT “BOOSTING THE MEDIA SECTOR FOR GREATER PEACE AND STABILITY IN GUINEA-BISSAU” Vanda Medeiros 9 December 2020 Acknowledgements The evaluator would like to thank the members and staff of United Nations Integrated Peace- building Office in Guinea Bissau (UNIOGBIS) Public Information Unit (PIU); the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the National Community Radio Network (RENARC), the Union of Journalists (SINJOTECS), the Guinea-Bissau Journalists Association (OJGB), the Association of Women Professionals of the Media (AMPROCS), the Action for Development (AD), and the Media Consortium Innovation (CMICS) for their valuable assistance and for taking the time to share their experiences and information. Special mention goes to Sophie Pereira and Julia Alhinho for their invaluable assistance, information, and support. The evaluator would also like to acknowledge all the stakeholders and beneficiaries who participated in the evaluation process and generously shared their thoughts and experiences, providing an invaluable contribution to this report. Finally, the evaluator would like to acknowledge the National Consultant, Lamine Sonco, for his support on the field mission activities. Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are those of the evaluator. They do not represent those of UNIOGBIS, UNDP, Peace Building Fund (PBF) or any of the institutions referred to in the report. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the author. Author This report was written by Vanda Medeiros. Page 2
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP Guinea-Bissau Gender Analysis
    UNDP GUINEA-BISSAU Final Version GENDER ANALYSIS 01.03.2021 GUINEA-BISSAU UNDP-Consultant: Dr. Birgit Embaló, PhD [email protected] 1 Abbreviations AfDB African Development Bank AMAE Associação/ Confederação das Mulheres com Atividades Económicas (Confederation of Women with Economic Activities) AMIC Associação de Amigos das Crianças (Friends of Children Association) ANP Assembleia Nacional Popular (National Popular Assembly – Parliament) CAJ Centro de Acesso a Justiça (Centre for Access to Justice) CC Codigo Civil (Civil Code) CCA Common Country Analysis CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women CMGFD Conselho das Mulheres Guineenses Facilitadores de Dialogo (Guinean Women Council of Facilitators for Dialogue) CNAPN O Comité Nacional para o Abandono das Praticas Tradicionais Nefastas a saúde da mulher e da criança (National Committee for the Elimination of Harmful Practices and Women and Child Health) CNMT National Commission of Working Women of the National Union of Workers CPD UNDP Country Programme Document CO Country Office CRGB Constituição da Républica da Guiné-Bissau (Constitution) CSO Civil Society Organization DENARP II Segundo Documento de Estratégia Nacional de Redução da Pobreza (Second National Poverty Reduction Strategy) DRR Disaster Risk Reduction ECOWAS Economic Community of West African States ECREE ECOWAS Centre for Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency EU European Union EWS Early Warning System FAO United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization FGM Female Genital Mutilation GBV
    [Show full text]
  • The United States, the European Union, and China: the Triadic Contest for Africa and Its Implications for International Human Rights and Democracy
    Concordia University - Portland CU Commons Faculty Scholarship School of Law Spring 2010 The nitU ed States, the European Union, and China: The rT iadic Contest for Africa and Its Implications for International Human Rights and Democracy Joseph M. Isanga Concordia University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.cu-portland.edu/lawfaculty Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons CU Commons Citation Joseph M. Isanga, The nitU ed States, the European Union, and China: The rT iadic Contest for Africa and Its Implications for International Human Rights and Democracy, 3 Nw. Interdisc. L. Rev. 175, 210 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at CU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of CU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The United States, The European Union, and China: The Triadic Contest for Africa and Its Implications for International Human Rights and Democracy Dr. Joseph M. Isanga- Ave Maria School of Law Introduction The African Continent is triangularly situated' among the three international actors whose engagement with Africa is inching every day towards a triadic contest: the United States [U.S.], the European Union [E.U.], and China.2 In this contest, human rights, the rule of law, and good governance have been increasingly given a secondary status to the consideration of economic gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Guinea-Bissau (2014 - 2016)
    Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol.5, No.3 Publication Date: Feb. 25, 2018 DoI:10.14738/assrj.53.4169. Sangreman, C., Delgado, F., & Martins L. V. (2018). Guinea-Bissau (2014 - 2016). An empirical study of economic and social human rights in a fragile state. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(3) 66-84. Guinea-Bissau (2014 - 2016). An empirical study of economic and social human rights in a fragile state. Carlos Sangreman University of Aveiro. Center of Studies on Africa, Asia and Latin America of the University of Lisbon. Fátima Delgado Association for Cooperation among Peoples (ACEP), NGO, Lisboa Luis Vaz Martins Guinean Human Rights League, Bissau ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to analyze the situation of the economic and social human rights in Guinea-Bissau. It uses data collected from seven of the eight administrative regions of the country between 2014 and 2016, for a project called "Observatory of Rights" in the fields of education, health, justice, housing, sanitation and livelihood from schools, health centers, jails and police stations and families. With 5 prime ministers since the elections of 2014, the political instability installed in the country shapes the life of citizens in all aspects and does not allow a positive evolution of economic and social human rights in the country.This article frames the analysis of the data into an interpretation of the situation of that period and elaborates the conclusions in the form of scenarios for the short-term future, including the possibility that the military might decide to take power as they have done in the recent past (2012).
    [Show full text]