Pyrrhus by Plutarch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Female Property Ownership and Status in Classical and Hellenistic Sparta
Female Property Ownership and Status in Classical and Hellenistic Sparta Stephen Hodkinson University of Manchester 1. Introduction The image of the liberated Spartiate woman, exempt from (at least some of) the social and behavioral controls which circumscribed the lives of her counterparts in other Greek poleis, has excited or horrified the imagination of commentators both ancient and modern.1 This image of liberation has sometimes carried with it the idea that women in Sparta exercised an unaccustomed influence over both domestic and political affairs.2 The source of that influence is ascribed by certain ancient writers, such as Euripides (Andromache 147-53, 211) and Aristotle (Politics 1269b12-1270a34), to female control over significant amounts of property. The male-centered perspectives of ancient writers, along with the well-known phenomenon of the “Spartan mirage” (the compound of distorted reality and sheer imaginative fiction regarding the character of Spartan society which is reflected in our overwhelmingly non-Spartan sources) mean that we must treat ancient images of women with caution. Nevertheless, ancient perceptions of their position as significant holders of property have been affirmed in recent modern studies.3 The issue at the heart of my paper is to what extent female property-holding really did translate into enhanced status and influence. In Sections 2-4 of this paper I shall approach this question from three main angles. What was the status of female possession of property, and what power did women have directly to manage and make use of their property? What impact did actual or potential ownership of property by Spartiate women have upon their status and influence? And what role did female property-ownership and status, as a collective phenomenon, play within the crisis of Spartiate society? First, however, in view of the inter-disciplinary audience of this volume, it is necessary to a give a brief outline of the historical context of my discussion. -
Crete in the Hellenistic Aegean: Seeing Through the Cretan Mirage Elizabeth Cummings University of Colorado Boulder
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CU Scholar Institutional Repository University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2014 Crete in the Hellenistic Aegean: Seeing Through the Cretan Mirage Elizabeth Cummings University of Colorado Boulder Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses Recommended Citation Cummings, Elizabeth, "Crete in the Hellenistic Aegean: Seeing Through the Cretan Mirage" (2014). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 73. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Honors Program at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cummings 0 CRETE IN THE HELLENISTIC AEGEAN: SEEING THROUGH THE CRETAN MIRAGE Elizabeth Cummings Department of Classics, University of Colorado at Boulder Defended April 4, 2014 Thesis Advisor Dr. Sarah James, Department of Classics Committee Members Dr. Sarah James, Department of Classics Dr. Peter Hunt, Department of Classics Dr. Catherine Cameron, Department of Anthropology Cummings 1 Abstract From a geographic perspective, the island of Crete in the south of the Aegean was well- positioned to engage in the rapidly expanding trade networks of the Mediterranean that flourished in the wake of the death of Alexander the Great. Ancient literary sources tell us that these maritime routes through which goods flowed were often plagued by ‘pirates’, roaming independently of any hegemonic rule. On the basis of Polybius, the most popular (modern and ancient) theory is that Hellenistic Crete was a center of this pirate activity. -
Chapter Page CHAPTER I
1 Chapter Page CHAPTER I. CHAPTER II. CHAPTER III. CHAPTER IV. CHAPTER V. CHAPTER VI. CHAPTER VII. CHAPTER VIII. CHAPTER IX. CHAPTER X. CHAPTER XI. CHAPTER XII. Pyrrhus, by Jacob Abbott 2 Pyrrhus, by Jacob Abbott The Project Gutenberg EBook of Pyrrhus, by Jacob Abbott This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Pyrrhus Makers of History Author: Jacob Abbott Release Date: November 12, 2008 [EBook #27240] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PYRRHUS *** Produced by D Alexander and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net Makers of History Pyrrhus BY JACOB ABBOTT WITH ENGRAVINGS NEW YORK AND LONDON HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS 1901 Pyrrhus, by Jacob Abbott 3 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and fifty-four, by HARPER & BROTHERS, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York. [Illustration: PYRRHUS VIEWING THE ROMAN ENCAMPMENT.] PREFACE. In respect to the heroes of ancient history, who lived in times antecedent to the period when the regular records of authentic history commence, no reliance can be placed upon the actual verity of the accounts which have come down to us of their lives and actions. In those ancient days there was, in fact, no line of demarkation between romance and history, and the stories which were told of Cyrus, Darius, Xerxes, Romulus, Pyrrhus, and other personages as ancient as they, are all more or less fabulous and mythical. -
Arsinoe in the Peloponnese: the Ptolemaic Base on the Methana Peninsula
Arsinoe in the Peloponnese: the Ptolemaic base on the Methana peninsula D. Gill In the late nineteenth century, an Egyptian portrait head was recovered from the sea off the island of Aegina. The piece, clearly a royal portrait with double crown and broken uraeus, was inscribed with hieroglyphs and was quickly rec- ognised as a portrait of Ptolemy VI Philometor. It is not clear if the portrait had been displayed on the island of Aegina or somewhere bordering the Sa- ronic Gulf, or if it had been dumped in modern times as excess ballast from a passing sailing ship. One possibility is that the statue was linked to one of the Ptolemaic bases in the Aegean, perhaps that located at the nearby peninsula of Methana. The Methana Peninsula The Methana peninsula adjoins the eastern side of the Argolid, pointing into the Saronic Gulf (Figure 1). To the east lies the island of Poros, and to the north-east the island of Aegina. Methana is linked to the mainland by a nar- row isthmus, a feature which was fortified from at least the fifth century BCE. The peninsula is largely volcanic, and the main dome rises to 760 m. Mineral springs are found around the peninsula, on the north side at the modern set- tlement of Pausanias, named in honour of the second century AD Roman travel writer who described the peninsula, and on the east side at Loutra, the modern spa-town of Methana, much frequented by present-day Athenians. The historic settlement of Methana lay on the west side of the peninsula at the site of Palaiokastro near the modern village of Megalochori. -
The Freedom of the Greeks in the Early Hellenistic Period (337-262 BC)
The Freedom of the Greeks in the Early Hellenistic Period (337-262 BC). A Study in Ruler-City Relations Shane Wallace Ph.D. University of Edinburgh 2011 Signed Declaration This thesis has been composed by the candidate, the work is the candidate‘s own and the work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification except as specified. Signed: ii Abstract This thesis treats of the use and meaning of the Greek concept of eleutheria (freedom) and the cognate term autonomia (autonomy) in the early Hellenistic Period (c.337-262 BC) with a specific focus on the role these concepts played in the creation and formalisation of a working relationship between city and king. It consists of six chapters divided equally into three parts with each part exploring one of the three major research questions of this thesis. Part One, Narratives, treats of the continuities and changes within the use and understanding of eleutheria and autonomia from the 5th to the 3rd centuries. Part Two, Analysis, focuses on the use in action of both terms and the role they played in structuring and defining the relationship between city and king. Part Three, Themes, explores the importance of commemoration and memorialisation within the early Hellenistic city, particularly the connection of eleutheria with democratic ideology and the afterlife of the Persian Wars. Underpinning each of these three sections is the argument that eleutheria played numerous, diverse roles within the relationship between city and king. In particular, emphasis is continually placed variously on its lack of definition, inherent ambiguity, and the malleability of its use in action. -
Plutarch: Life of Antonius
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Senior Thesis Projects, 2003-2006 College Scholars 2005 Plutarch: Life of Antonius Casey Mock Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_interstp3 Recommended Citation Mock, Casey, "Plutarch: Life of Antonius" (2005). Senior Thesis Projects, 2003-2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_interstp3/49 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the College Scholars at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Thesis Projects, 2003-2006 by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORMC COLLEGE SCHOLARS PROJECT APPROVAL Scholar Mentor COMMITIEE MEMBERS (Minimum 3 Required) Name PLEASE ATIACH A COPY OF THE SENIOR PROJECT TO THIS SHEET AND RETURN BOTH TO THE PROGRAM DIRECTOR. THIS PAGE SHOULD BE DATED AND COMPLETED ON THE DATE THAT YOUR DEFENSE IS HELD. / DATE COMPLETED _0-----1)_~--+-11{r----=D---., · J.L-'_ Plutarch's Life ofAntonius Translation and Commentary, C.A. Mock Life of Antonius Introduction Plutarch, Historiography, and the Lives From the fourteenth to the eighteenth century, L. Mestrius Plutarch attracted more readers than any other Greek author, and was the most influential author among those readers outside the circle of classical scholarship. The original French translation of his works by Amyot, later retranslated by North and Holland, was essential to the dissemination of his works; only this translation made it possible for Shakespeare to become familiar with the material necessary for his historical tragedies. Frederick the Great, Montaigne, Goethe, Rousseau, Benjamin Franklin, and En1erson all read Plutarch - not only for his Lives but also for his instruction in moral philosophy. -
Antigonas II Gonatas Antigonas II Gonatas Became King Of
Antigonas II Gonatas Antigonas II Gonatas became king of Macedonia in 277 BC and was the founder of the Antigonid Dynasty, which ruled the powerful Macedonian kingdom until it was conquered by the Romans. Antigonas’s life was mostly spent fighting other Macedonians and Greeks in order to carve out a stable kingdom. Antigonas’s life embodies the chaos and violence experienced by the first few generations after Alexander, as the Greek world entered the Hellenistic period. Family and Early Life Antigonas II Gonatas was the son of Demetrius “the City-Taker,” who in turn was the son of Alexander’s famous general Antigonas I, “the One-Eyed.” His mother was Phila, the daughter of the Macedonian regent Antipater, who had attempted to rule Alexander’s empire until he was assassinated in 319 BC. Thus, Antigonas Gonatas was born into the families who were the successors of Alexander the Great. The meaning of “Gonatas” is unknown; it may be the name of the town where he was born, but it also might be an obscure nickname, as it comes from the Greek word for “knee.” Antigonas Gonatas’s grandfather, Antigonas I, had been the successor with the best opportunity to reunite Alexander’s empire under his rule. But in order to prevent this, the other Diadochi (Alexander’s successors), led by Seleucus, united and defeated him at the Battle of Ipsus, in Asia Minor, in 301 BC. Antigonas I was killed in that battle, but his son Demetrius and his grandson, Antigonas Gonatas, escaped to Macedonia. While the Diadochi of the victorious coalition fell out with one another, Demetrius took the opportunity to kill Alexander, who had inherited his father Cassander’s regency over Macedonia, and make himself king. -
Crete in the Hellenistic Aegean
Cummings 0 CRETE IN THE HELLENISTIC AEGEAN: SEEING THROUGH THE CRETAN MIRAGE Elizabeth Cummings Department of Classics, University of Colorado at Boulder Defended April 4, 2014 Thesis Advisor Dr. Sarah James, Department of Classics Committee Members Dr. Sarah James, Department of Classics Dr. Peter Hunt, Department of Classics Dr. Catherine Cameron, Department of Anthropology Cummings 1 Abstract From a geographic perspective, the island of Crete in the south of the Aegean was well- positioned to engage in the rapidly expanding trade networks of the Mediterranean that flourished in the wake of the death of Alexander the Great. Ancient literary sources tell us that these maritime routes through which goods flowed were often plagued by ‘pirates’, roaming independently of any hegemonic rule. On the basis of Polybius, the most popular (modern and ancient) theory is that Hellenistic Crete was a center of this pirate activity. Powerful ruling cities like Rhodes, attacked Crete in the 3rd c. BC with the professed intent to destroy any pirate threat housed there. The mirage is that Crete is an island full of pirates, liars, and greedy citizens has continued in modern scholarship. This “Cretan Mirage” has had the effects of perpetuating the stereotypes of ancient Crete and marginalizing it within studies of the Hellenistic period. Paula Perlman first proposed that the “Cretan Mirage” was at work in the depictions of the First Cretan war (Perlman, 1992, 151-153). Here I go further to suggest that the “Cretan Mirage” has blinded scholars to other valid arguments about Cretan history and economics during the Hellenistic period. First, I will place Hellenistic Crete within its broader Aegean context, and, using archaeological and literary data, then I will compare the political and economic position of Crete to another major economic power in the Aegean, Rhodes. -
The Activity of Ptolemy II's Fleet in the Aegean
ELECTRUM * Vol. 27 (2020): 131–148 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.20.007.12797 www.ejournals.eu/electrum The Activity of Ptolemy II’s Fleet in the Aegean Sea Tomasz Grabowski http:/orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-6920 Jagiellonian University in Kraków Abstract: Ptolemy I, the founder of the Lagid dynasty, heavily invested in the navy and thus established the Ptolemies as a formidable sea power, his work continued by his successor Ptolemy II Philadelphus, who employed his fleet to pressure lesser powers of the Mediterranean. The fol- lowing article examines the activity of Ptolemy II’s fleet in the Aegean Sea. At the end of the 270s, Ptolemy II sent a naval expedition to the Black Sea; the operation helped him establish a political relationship with Byzantion and demonstrated that maintaining a naval presence on foreign waters could influence other rulers to favor the Ptolemies. The Ptolemaic fleet under Ptolemy II Philadel- phus operated in the Aegean during two major international conflicts, the Chremonidean War and the Second Syrian War. In this article I argue that the surviving evidence on the Chremonidean War indicates that Ptolemy II’s aim was not to subdue Greece or even Macedonia but to maintain the Ptolemaic hold over the Aegean with Egypt’s relatively small naval force under Patroclus. In turn, the outcome of the Second Syrian War led to a considerable weakening of the Lagids’ position in the Aegean. Ptolemy II adroitly cultivated international relations through diplomacy, propaganda, international euergetism and spreading his dynastic cult; sending the Ptolemaic fleet to patrol foreign seas constituted one crucial instrument Philadelphus could employ to shift the Mediterranean balance of power in his favor. -
The Persian Policies of Alexander the Great: from 330-323 Bc
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2005 The eP rsian policies of Alexander the Great: from 330-323 BC Nicholas Ed Foster Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Foster, Nicholas Ed, "The eP rsian policies of Alexander the Great: from 330-323 BC" (2005). LSU Master's Theses. 3315. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3315 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PERSIAN POLICIES OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT: FROM 330-323 BC A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Nicholas Ed Foster B.A., Louisiana State University, 2001 May, 2005 Table of Contents Abstract...........................................................................................................................................iv Introduction………………………………………..………………………………............………1 Modern Scholars: Tarn and Bosworth……………………………………............……….4 Chapter 1: Classical Sources..........................................................................................................11 -
Egypt After the Pharaohs: 332 BC-AD
EGYPT after the Pharaohs Alan K Bowman EGYPT after the Pharaohs 332 BC-AD 642 from Alexander to the Arab Conquest UNIVERSITY OE CALllORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES r i</86 Alan k. Bownun Published by the I'nivcrsitv of < !a|ift irnta Press in ilie I'niied Siato 1986 First [xiperlrjck printing 1989 Second paperback printing 1996 Library ot'Oingrcsii (Jtalo^uing-in-Pulilicniion Data Bowman. Alan K. I'gypi after rhepharaohs. tw u.r. \.i>. (142. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. l\u\pt (.'ivili/aiinn it: iu:. fi;H A.D. I. "I'itle mVii.lttii 1986 y\x'.oi 86 inn ISBN o 52020s 11-G Printed in I long Kong 12 m ft i x 9 Contents Acknowledgements 6 Preface 2 Note on Conventions 8 List of lllusrriitions 8 i The (iift of the Nile u 2 The Ruling Power 21 3 State and Subject s 5 4 Poverty and Prosperity 89 5 Greeks and Egyptians 121 6 Gods, Temples and Churches i6j 7 Alexandria, Queen of the Mediterranean 203 8 Epilogue 2$4 Appendix I The Reigns of the Ptolemies 2 s S Appendix II Metrology and Currency 236 Appendix III The Archaeological Evidence M9 Appendix IV Additional Notes 242 Footnotes 345 Bibliography ip Index 26s Ackno w 1 edgemcnts National Trust (The Calkc Gardner Wilkinson Papers. Bodleian Library, Oxford): 10, 34, 52, Acknowledgement is made to the following for J J. 82 permission to reproduce illustrations: Pctrie Museum, University College. London: 6 Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh: 63 Antikenmuscum, Staatlichc Musecn, Prcuss- Scala, Florence: t, 45, 71, 112 ischer Kulturbcsitz, Berlin: i \ Dr H. -
“The Hellenistic Ruler Cult and Ptolemy I's Quest for Legitimacy”
“The Hellenistic Ruler Cult and Ptolemy I’s Quest for Legitimacy” A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN CLASSICS RHODES UNIVERSITY By SIHLE NTULI DECEMEBER 2016 i Gratitude Special thanks to Daniel Malamis for helping out with the articulation of thoughts. Your hard work on this endeavour was certainly appreciated. I would also like to thank Mike Lambert and John Jackson. Thank you both for consulting on the project, I have appreciated the advice and general assistance. Finally, thanks to my mother Thandiwe Ntuli, who funded my whole year of study. I appreciate all the sacrifices you have had to make to allow me to complete my additional year. ii Abstract Alexander III died suddenly in Babylon in 323 BC. With Philip III Arrhidaeus in a mentally deficient state and Alexander IV not being of age, Alexander died without a suitable heir. The task of succeeding one of the most storied legacies in the ancient world was left to the generals of Alexander III. On his deathbed, Alexander was asked who should lead the Macedonians, of which he allegedly replied “the strongest”. Thus began the process of selecting the individual who would succeed Alexander the Great, which ended up becoming a contentious task due to Macedonian succession customs. Subsequently the ‘Successors’ quarrelled over who should succeed Alexander as the true successor. The wars of the Successors are founded on an issue of legitimacy that qualifies the notion of the strongest. Being deemed the true successor of Alexander the Great meant the opportunity to continue a period of Macedonian dominance following the reigns of Philip II and Alexander III.