DOCSLIB.ORG

Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2016-2036 Prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in Consultation with the Metropolitan Counties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2016-2036 Prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in Consultation with the Metropolitan Counties rdfconatton z c Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2016-2036 Prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency in consultation with the Metropolitan Counties A Minnesota family of five generates approximately 6 tons of garbage per year. The policies in this plan support waste reduction, recycling, organics management and resource recovery in the metropolitan area A Minnesota familyas a way of five to minimizegenerates waste approximately going to landfills. six tons of garbage per year. July 2016 Legislative charge Minn. Stat. § 473.149 A metropolitan long range policy plan for solid waste management, prepared by the Pollution Control Agency, sets goals and policies for the metropolitan solid waste system, including recycling consistent with section 115A.551, and household hazardous waste management consistent with section 115A.96, subdivision 6. The MPCA shall include specific and quantifiable metropolitan objectives for abating to the greatest feasible and prudent extent the need for and practice of land disposal of mixed municipal solid waste and of specific components of the solid waste stream. Authors Johanna Kertesz The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Peder Sandhei by using the Internet to distribute reports and Sigurd Scheurle information to wider audience. Visit our web Colleen Hetzel site for more information. Anna Kerr MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Mark Rust consumer recycled content paper Tim Farnan manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Susan Heffron derivatives Contributors Metropolitan county staff MPCA staff . Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | [email protected] This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: w-sw7-21a Contents Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Part One: Introduction and background ................................................................................ 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 What has been accomplished already? ........................................................................................................... 3 What challenges still exist? .............................................................................................................................. 4 Part Two: Framework for change .......................................................................................... 6 Vision ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Key themes ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Goals and policies ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Part Three: Metropolitan System Plan 2016-2036 ............................................................... 10 Regional waste generation forecast ............................................................................................................... 10 Statutory goals ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Solid waste abatement objectives ................................................................................................................. 14 Improving the reliability of the data .............................................................................................................. 18 Additional benefits of attaining the MMSW system objectives ..................................................................... 20 Best management practices to achieve the 75% recycling goal .................................................................... 21 Regional solutions .......................................................................................................................................... 21 Source reduction and reuse ........................................................................................................................... 23 Collection best practices ................................................................................................................................ 24 Traditional recycling management ................................................................................................................. 26 Organics management ................................................................................................................................... 28 Non-mixed municipal solid waste .................................................................................................................. 32 Recycling market development ...................................................................................................................... 39 Emerging technology ...................................................................................................................................... 42 Product stewardship ...................................................................................................................................... 43 Part Four: Implementing the plan ....................................................................................... 44 Solid25B waste master plans ................................................................................................................................ 44 MPCA26B initiatives that will be used to support the plan.................................................................................. 44 Implementation27B monitoring ........................................................................................................................... 45 Legislative reports .......................................................................................................................................... 45 Metropolitan28B Landfill Abatement Account .................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A: Overview of the current Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) solid waste management system .......................................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Environmental justice review .......................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: Predrafting notice ........................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D: Procedures, standards, and criteria ................................................................. D-1 Appendix10B E: Glossary .......................................................................................................... E-1 Acronyms ARM Association of Recycling Managers C&D Construction and demolition debris CII Commercial, industrial, institutional CON Certificate of Need EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency HHW Household hazardous waste ISW Industrial solid waste ISWM Integrated solid waste management LRDG Local Recycling Development Grants MLAA Metropolitan Landfill Abatement Account MMSW Mixed municipal solid waste MPCA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency MRF Materials recovery facility Plan Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan RDF Refuse derived fuel RMD Recycling market development SMM Sustainable Materials Management SSO Source Separated Organics SWMCB Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board TCMA Twin Cities Metropolitan Area USDA U.S. Department of Agriculture WARM Waste reduction model WLSSD Western Lake Superior Sanitary District WMA Waste Management Plan WMI Waste Management Inc. WTE Waste to energy Summary This Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan (Plan) establishes the plan for managing the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area’s (TCMA) solid waste through 2036. The Plan will be adopted by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA).The seven metropolitan counties (Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington) participated in the development of the Plan. The overarching message of this Plan is that fundamental change in the form of accountability and effective tools is necessary among the stakeholders responsible for solid waste management in the TCMA, if the region is to continue to move beyond current trends and meet the goals set forth in the Waste Management Act (WMA). The activities of these stakeholders must be aligned so that overall system goals are achieved in a cost effective manner and reach state goals and objectives. This Plan provides a framework for change to assist state and local leadership and all stakeholders to meet these challenges and advance the TCMA solid waste system. Minn. Stat. § 473.149 requires that the Plan be followed in the TCMA. All stakeholders, including the MPCA, will be accountable for implementing the Plan. The Plan is comprised of four parts that describe the responsibilities of stakeholders, including product producers, all levels of government, waste generators, and waste management businesses. The Plan outlines the challenges
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Litter Legislation: a Toolkit for Policymakers
    Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Acknowledgments This report was developed by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It was researched, drafted, and produced by Carl Bruch, Kathryn Mengerink, Elana Harrison, Davonne Flanagan, Isabel Carey, Thomas Casey, Meggan Davis, Elizabeth Hessami, Joyce Lombardi, Norka Michel- en, Colin Parts, Lucas Rhodes, Nikita West, and Sofia Yazykova. Within UNEP, Heidi Savelli, Arnold Kreilhuber, and Petter Malvik oversaw the development of the report. The authors express their appreciation to the peer reviewers, including Catherine Ayres, Patricia Beneke, Angela Howe, Ileana Lopez, Lara Ognibene, David Vander Zwaag, and Judith Wehrli. Cover photo: Plastics floating in the ocean The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2016. United Nations Environment Programme. Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, Flows, and the Circular Economy Potential
    The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng Supporting Contributors: 2 The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng 3 With the current documented formal collection and recycling rate of 17.4%, a potential raw computers, printed wiring boards, connectors, relays, wires, and cables (McPherson, material value of $10 billion USD can be recovered from e-waste, and 4 Mt of secondary Thorpe, and Blake 2004 & Herat 2008). The recycling of plastic containing BFR represents a raw materials would become available for recycling. Focusing only on iron, aluminium, major challenge for e-waste recycling because of the costs related to the separation of plastic and copper and comparing emissions resulting from their use as virgin raw materials or containing PBDEs and PBBs from other plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. WASTE MANAGEMENT (1) Hazardous Waste Specific Actions
    2. WASTE MANAGEMENT (1) Hazardous Waste Specific actions and the implementation process Special attention is required for disposing of waste with hazardous qualities, such as infectious, flammable, or poisonous waste, and thus these items are designated as “waste under special control” under Japan’s Waste Disposal and Public Cleansing Law, and regulations implemented for these items are stricter than those for normal waste. Specifically, regulations consist of complying with strict processing standards during such processes as storage, collection, transport, and disposal, a permit system for professional processors and processing facilities, and the establishment of a Manager in Charge of the Special Control of Industrial Waste. In a recent effort, as part of a response to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Japan established Technical Considerations regarding the Processing of POPs (established in 2004 and revised in 2009) that were previously buried in the ground, and is providing technical guidance to ensure their proper disposal. In addition, efforts are currently being promoted for the proper collection and disposal of infectious waste, etc. that accompanies the new influenza and home healthcare by such means as establishing guidelines and manuals. In order to process waste including polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) with certainty and adequacy, the Law Concerning Special Measures Against PCB Waste was formulated in 2001, under which the Japan Environmental Safety Corporation (JESCO), a government funded corporation, is handling the processing of high-pressure transformers, capacitors, and other items that contain PCB. In terms of asbestos waste, there is the possibility that the concerns of residents could lead to disposal sites rejecting the waste or illegal dumping.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Radioactive Waste Management Legislation for Applicationto Users of Radioactive Materials Medicine,In Research Industryand
    IAEA-TECDOC-644 Guidance on radioactive waste management legislation for applicationto users of radioactive materials medicine,in research industryand [ ARCHiViS-AC ..„........./...M INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copies of these reports can be obtained from INIS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse5 0 10 P.Ox Bo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders should be accompanied by prepayment of Austrian Schillings 100, for e for e chequa th mf th IAEf m o n i o n i r eAo microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. GUIDANC RADIOACTIVN EO E WASTE MANAGEMENT LEGISLATION FOR APPLICATIOO NT USER RADIOACTIVF SO E MATERIAL MEDICINESN I , RESEARC INDUSTRD HAN Y IAEA, VIENNA, 1992 IAEA-TECDOC-644 ISSN 1011-4289 Printed by the IAEA in Austria April 1992 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT MISSINE TH AL F LO G PAGE THIN SI S DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK FOREWORD bees Iha tn observe y IAEb d A Technical Co-operation experts and advisory missions to developing countries in radioactive waste management and radiation protection, particularly Waste Management Advisory Programme (WAMAP) and Radiation Protection Advisory Team (RAPAT) missions, that there is no uniform approach in the understandin d implementatioan g f radioactivo n e waste management systems - from generation of waste to disposal - in different countries necessars i t I . ensuro yt globaa e l uniformite th n i y approache o findint s g solutione safth e r managemenfo s f o t radioactive wastes. e basith cf o requirement e On n implementini s a gsaf e radioactive waste management regim s thai l countriee al t s should have adequate legislation for managing radioactive wastes.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Law
    In the Name of God Waste Management Law Article 1- To fulfil the fiftieth Principle of the Islamic Republic of Iran Constitutional Law and in order to protect the environment form harmful effects of waste materials, all ministries whose liability to Act requires a mention of their names, and all juridical and natural persons should observe regulations and policies ordained in the present Act. Article 2- Terms and Expressions used in the Act herein are interpreted as follows: A) Organization: it refers to the Environment Protection Organization. B) Waste materials: it refers to any solid, liquid or gas (except sewage) wastes which are directly or indirectly generated as a result of man’s activities and are considered as waste from generator viewpoint. Wastes fall in to five groups: 1) Ordinary Wastes: means any wastes which are commonly generated as a result of man’s life process inside and outside cities and villages such as household and demolition wastes. 2) Medical (Hea1th Care) wastes: means any infectious and harmful wastes generated by hospitals, health and treatment facilities, medical laboratories and other similar facilities. Other harmless hospital wastes are not included. 3) Special wastes: Any wastes requiring special care due to containing at least one of the hazardous components of poisonous, pathogenesis, explosiveness, inflammability, corrosiveness and the likes. Those medical wastes, as well as some part of ordinary, industrial, and agricultural wastes which needs to special management, are included as specific wastes. 4) Agricultural wastes: Any wastes resulted from productive activities in the agricultural section including animal refuse, animal corps (cattle, poultry, and aquatic animals), decayed or unusable agricultural products.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter Prevention
    Marine Litter Prevention Reducing plastic waste leakage into waterways and oceans through circular economy and sustainable waste management As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany Friedrich-Ebert-Allee 36 + 40 53113 Bonn, Germany T +49 228 44 60 - 0 F +49 228 44 60 - 17 66 E [email protected] I www.giz.de Project description: Advisory Project: Concepts for Sustainable Solid Waste Management and Circular Economy Authors: Pascal Renaud for GIZ, Joachim Stretz and Jacky Lateheru for the Resources and Waste Advisory Group (RWA), Rabah Kerbachi as individual consultant Edited by: Ellen Gunsilius, Johannes Paul, Steffen Blume, Daniel Hinchliffe, Barbara Ölz, Michael Funcke-Bartz, Uwe Becker and Ina Tessnow- von Wysocki for GIZ Design/layout: Jeanette Geppert pixelundpunkt kommunikation, Frankfurt Printing and distribution: Druckreif GmbH, Frankfurt Printed on 100% recycled paper, certified to FSC standards Photo credits/sources: Shutterstock: p. 10; CET Annaba: p. 17 ; Ikhlasul Amal, p. 18; Storebrukkebruse: p. 26; UN Photo / Kim Haughton: p. 31; Hippone Sub: p. 60; Maison de l’environnement Annaba: p. 60; GIZ / Florian Kopp: p. 14, 20; GIZ: p. 19; GIZ/ Jacky Lateheru and Joachim Stretz: p. 34, 40, 43, 46, 47, 50, 83; GIZ / Rabah Kerbachi: p. 61-67, 73; GIZ / Pascal Renaud: cover, p. 3, 24, 32-33, 56, 75, 76, 93 URL links: This publication contains links to external websites. Responsibility for the content of the listed external sites always lies with their respective publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 REPORT Waste Trade in Southeast Asia: Legal Justifications for Regional Action JULY 2021
    Waste Trade in Southeast Asia LEGAL JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REGIONAL ACTION 2021 REPORT Waste Trade in Southeast Asia: Legal Justifications for Regional Action JULY 2021 © EcoWaste Coalition Lead Author: Atty. Gregorio Rafael P. Bueta Lead Contributor: Justine Nicole V. Torres (Philippines and Thailand) Contributors: Dr. Hanim Kamaruddin (Malaysia) Atty. Conrado M. Cornelius (Indonesia) Researchers: Mikaela Pamatmat Reynaleigh Delos Reyes Veronica Pine Expert Support: Matthew H. Baird (Asian Research Institute for Environmental Law) Graphic Layout: Chester Tan (Parabukas, Inc.) Reviewers: Manny Calonzo; Chinkie Pelino-Golle; Lea Guerrero; Marian Ledesma; Yuyun Ismawati; Mageswari Sangaralingam; Thony Dizon; Lee Bell DISCLAIMER This document has been produced with the financial contribution by the Swedish International Development Co-operation Agency (SIDA) through the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, (SSNC). The views herein shall not necessarily be taken to reflect the official opinion of SSNC or its donor. © Manny Calonzo/EcoWaste Coalition WASTE TRADE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA CONTENTS i. List of Acronyms ii. Executive Summary I. Introduction 1 Background 2 Objectives and Methodology II. Global Trends and Developments 4 Global Waste Situationer 4 Major Waste Management Challenges Waste Trade Marine Plastic Pollution COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts 6 International Policy Framework Basel Convention and Basel Ban Amendment Waste Issues in other Multilateral Environmental Agreements Global Agreement on Marine Plastics III. ASEAN Policy Landscape 10 ASEAN Declarations, Positions and Action Plans 11 National-level Efforts IV. Waste Trade in ASEAN 13 ASEAN Experiences with Waste Trade 13 ASEAN and Global Waste Trade - Why It Matters 14 Waste Trade in Selected ASEAN Member States Indonesia Malaysia The Philippines Thailand 17 Analysis of Country Case Studies V.
    [Show full text]
  • Morocco: Municipal Solid Waste Management Program Carbon Partnership Facility
    MOROCCO: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CARBON PARTNERSHIP FACILITY Description Context The Morocco Landfills’ Gas Capture, Flaring and Use The Moroccan government launched an ambitious Program avoids methane emissions at a number of reform program when it approved the National Solid new or rehabilitated landfills by capturing the biogas Waste Program in September 2006 and adopted the produced by solid waste. The program promotes the Solid Waste Management Law 28-00 in November 2006. flaring or use of landfill gas (LFG) for energy production. Municipalities are now required to improve their sanitary The Fonds d’Equipement Communal, Morocco’s services and waste disposal practices, rehabilitate or municipal development bank, will develop and manage close open dump sites, and promote the construction the activities. The municipalities participating in the of sanitary landfills. However, this program goes program will either construct and operate the project beyond the requirements of the law by supporting LFG themselves or contract it out to the private sector. extraction, flaring, or use for electrical or thermal power generation. Along with the reform, a legal framework for In addition to methane, the program will reduce carbon private sector participation in street cleaning, municipal dioxide emissions in Morocco by displacing the waste collection and disposal was set up. As a result, production of electricity or heat energy based on fossil concession contracts have been awarded to private fuels. sector operators for the construction and operation of sanitary landfills. This Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Program of Activities will generate about 1 million carbon credits Given the financial burden, municipalities are not keen by 2020 and will sell these to the World Bank’s Carbon to invest in LFG elimination or utilization projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management Services 2013
    Waste Management Services 2013 The OECD Competition Committee debated Waste Management Services in October 2013. This document includes an executive summary of that debate and the documents from the meeting: a background note, written submissions by Canada, the Czech Republic, Estonia, the European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation, the Slovak Republic, South Africa, Sweden, Chinese Taipei, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, the United States, BIAC as well as an aide-memoire of the discussion. Technological and policy changes have altered the economics of waste collection and treatment. Landfills are further away from cities and larger. More waste is diverted towards treatments that allow to re-use it, recycle it, or to recover energy from it. Secondary raw materials derived from recycled waste are being increasingly sought afters, as primary raw materials are becoming scarcer and more expensive. Producers have been made responsible for the products they have put on the market at the post-consumer stage of the products’ life. All these changes are raising new competition issues, some relative to the conduct of firms operating in the markets for the management of waste, some raised by the ever-increasing amount of environmental legislation. This legislation is aimed at protecting the environment and the health of citizens, but may sometimes raise unnecessary barriers to competition and thus reduce the incentives towards efficiency. This Roundtable examines recent developments in the management of municipal solid waste and discusses the experience of competition agencies in addressing the competition implications of these changes.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Years of Government Responses to the Global Plastic Pollution
    NICHOLAS INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY SOLUTIONS 20 Years of Government Responses to the Global Plastic Pollution Problem The Plastics Policy Inventory Rachel Karasik, Tibor Vegh, Zoie Diana, Janet Bering, Juan Caldas, Amy Pickle, Daniel Rittschof, and John Virdin Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions nicholasinstitute.duke.edu 20 Years of Government Responses to the Global Plastic Pollution Problem The Plastics Policy Inventory Author Affiliations Acknowledgements Rachel Karasik, Tibor Vegh, Amy Pickle and John The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable Virdin: Duke University Nicholas Institute for peer-review provided by Dr. Karen Raubenheimer, Environmental Policy Solutions Australia National Centre for Ocean Resources and Zoie Diana, Janet Bering, Juan Caldas, and Daniel Security (ANCORS), University of Wollongong, Rittschof: Duke University Nicholas School of the and Prof. Tony Walker, Dalhousie University. Environment Additionally, the study benefited from collabora- tion with Common Seas and guidance provided by Citation Ben Jack, as well as from early suggestions by Neal Karasik, R.,* T. Vegh,* Z. Diana,* J. Bering, J. Tangri, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives. Caldas, A. Pickle, D. Rittschof, and J. Virdin. 2020. 20 Years of Government Responses to the The study drew upon research conducted by Emily Global Plastic Pollution Problem: The Plastics Melvin, Emma Schmaltz, and Zoie Diana as part Policy Inventory. NI X 20-05. Durham, NC: Duke of a Bass Connections Course led by Dr. Meagan University. Dunphy-Daly, Duke University, and support- ed by Dr. Jason Somarelli, Duke University, as *Designates co-first authorship well as by Mengqi Li and Rocky Guzman, led by Prof. Kathinka Furst, Duke Kunshan Universi- ty.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of State E-Waste Legislation
    Order Code RL34147 Managing Electronic Waste: An Analysis of State E-Waste Legislation August 29, 2007 Linda Luther Environmental Policy Analyst Resources, Science, and Industry Division Managing Electronic Waste: An Analysis of State E-Waste Legislation Summary Pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established regulations regarding the disposal of hazardous wastes. Although there are federal requirements under RCRA for the management of hazardous waste, some states have opted to implement more stringent requirements — particularly with regard to the management of certain hazardous wastes generated by households and small businesses (entities that are essentially exempt from RCRA’s hazardous waste management requirements). One category of household hazardous waste that many states are choosing to regulate more strictly is electronic waste, commonly referred to as “e-waste.” E-waste generally refers to obsolete, broken, or irreparable electronic equipment like televisions, computers and computer monitors, laptops, printers, cell phones, copiers, fax machines, stereos, or video gaming systems. Cathode ray tubes (CRTs) in televisions and computer monitors have presented a particular concern to states, primarily due to the potentially significant amounts of lead they contain and the large numbers in which they are generated. State concerns specific to the landfill disposal or incineration of e-waste are largely due to its increasing volume and often bulky nature; hazardous constituents, such as lead and mercury, it may contain; its high cost of recycling; and the inability of interested stakeholders, such as electronics retailers and manufacturers, to reach consensus on how to voluntarily implement a national e-waste management system.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Tier 1 in the Legal 500 and Band 1 in Chambers UK
    dentons.com Environment Tier 1 in The Legal 500 and Band 1 in Chambers UK Tier 2 in The Legal 500 Scotland and Chambers Band 1 ranked lawyer in Scotland Stephen Shergold offers “deep substantive knowledge, coupled with great experience with the regulators and knows how to get the regulator to recognise the business realities,” “His communication skills are superb and he is a real asset in negotiations.” – Chambers 2017 Sam Boileau is described by clients as “exceptionally knowledgeable and helpful,” and clients are “impressed with his ability to think ahead and analyse the business needs.” – Chambers 2017 Helen Bowdren is “very credible in the field of environmental litigation of risk.” – The Legal 500 2017 “…the firm is an authority on many local areas in the developing world. The team has good knowledge on industrial pollution claims and breaks everything down to understandable but cutting-edge advice.” – Chambers 2017 Pamela Coulthard attracts praise from sources for being “very good technically”. – Chambers 2017 Environment The Dentons Environment & Safety team is ranked by both Chambers and The Legal 500 as one of a small handful of leading environmental practices in the UK. With four individual rankings in Chambers, the Dentons Environment & Safety team is “recommended for strong industry knowledge, particularly within the waste, oil and gas and energy sectors.” and “noted for its sound legal advice.” – Chambers UK, 2017 We are very experienced in Our clients benefit from a UK environmental law. Our key strengths environmental practice that has lie in the breadth of our specialist in-depth experience not only in practice which covers: traditional areas of environmental and safety law such as waste • Advising on environmental and management, pollution control safety compliance and health and safety, but also • Defending clients in connection in developing areas of legislation with regulatory investigations and concerning climate change, prosecutions renewables and sustainability.
    [Show full text]