(Weee) - Proposals for Action

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Weee) - Proposals for Action UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG. 357/Inf. 11 13 April 2011 ENGLISH MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN Meeting of MED POL Focal Points Rhodes (Greece), 25 - 27 May 2011 DDRRAAFFTT ASSESSMENT OF THE STATUS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE FROM ELECTRIC/ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT (WEEE) - PROPOSALS FOR ACTION Delegates are kindly requested to bring their documents to the meeting UNEP/MAP Athens, 2011 Acknowledgement The project “Assessment of Electronic, Electric Equipments (WEEE)” is part of the activities of the Basel Convention Regional Centre (BCRC) Slovakia. Its activities fall into the category of “The Environmentally Sound Management of the Basel Convention Priority Waste Streams”. The project was carried out by two experts under the guidance of the BCRC Slovakia in Bratislava and UNEP MAP. The main goal of the project was to assess the whole Mediterranean region which is composed of twenty one countries. Among these countries, eight is already an EU member and most of them are candidate countries to the European Union. All the involved countries have access to the Mediterranean Sea and, in addition, they are Parties to the Basel Convention. The project has two aspects. The first one is to assess the current situation. The second aspect is to work out a proposal for the regional action plan. The project is realised thanks to the funding provided by the UNEP/MAP as a donor institution. The Project Co-ordinator would like to use this opportunity to thank Mr. Fouad Abousamra, MEDPOL Programme Officer, for providing the funds and his professional support for the project. Simultaneously, the Project Co-ordinator would like to thank to both involved experts mentioned in alphabetical order for their professional approach. Ms. Katarína Lenková, Slovak Environmental Agency Mr. Jaromír Manhart, Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic Ms Dana Lapešová Project Co-ordinator Basel Convention Regional Centre Slovakia Project Summary The present project “Assessment of Electronic, Electric Equipments (WEEE)” has been realised thanks to the financial support provided by MEDPOL. The project is focused on assessment of the status of the management of the waste from electric and electronic equipment (WEEE) through two main project activities. The first one was to prepare a regional assessment of the current situation based on sub-regional assessments. The second task was to develop a proposal for action according to the Basel Convention Guidelines with the aim to develop a region-wide management plan. The waste from electric and electronic equipment or e-waste is currently growing as one of the most rapidly waste streams, in developed and developing countries and in countries with economies in transition (CET). The e-waste contains valuable materials appropriate for recovery or recycling. For that reason the e-waste management could play a very important role in countries’ economy. The Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal, which is ratified by most of the Mediterranean countries, emphasises environmentally sound management with the aim to protect human health and environment. Basel Convention experts worked out some specific guidelines aimed to assist Parties to manage the waste from electrical and electronic equipment in an environmentally sound manner. Eight of the Mediterranean countries are also members of the European Union. The two Directives related to e-waste have to be implemented into national legislation in that case: Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment, and Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) The present project provides information on the following topics: ¾ Identification and/or estimation of current and future waste streams: materials composition of current and future flow streams ¾ Reuse possibilities: current levels of reuse of different WEEE, opportunities for greater reuse of products or parts of products, barriers to greater reuse, example of best and worst practices in re-se schemes ¾ Collection and collection scheme operation: organization of national collection schemes, cost of the schemes, Economic instruments to facilitate the collection, administrative requirements ¾ Sorting and sorting scheme operation: organization of national sorting schemes, cost of the schemes, Economic instruments to facilitate sorting, administrative requirements ¾ Recycling and recycling scheme operation: organization of national recycling schemes, cost of the schemes, Economic instruments to facilitate the recycling, administrative requirements ¾ Disposal and disposal scheme operation: organization of national disposal schemes, cost of the schemes, Economic instruments to facilitate the environmental sound disposal, administrative requirements ¾ Technology to treat process or dispose of WEEE: capacities and inputs/outputs for existing technologies for sorting, treatment including recovery, recycling and disposal In addition, the project proposes the “way forward” or recommendations and actions to be taken. The recommendations varies whether the country is a member state of EU or not. The recommendations are focused on two areas - technical and administrative/ financial. On the top, there should be proper legislation. In case of EU members there are two Directives on WEEE and related regulations. The real implementation should be checked by environmental inspectorates. It is very important: • to create the national waste management plans with clear targets; • to create appropriate conditions for the market of recycled and secondary raw materials; • to generate detailed national WEEE statistics and regularly report comprehensive WEEE data through the one designated body on both regional and international level; • to improve collection infrastructure especially of WEEE from municipal and household waste stream • to provide and widen WEEE take-back system for consumers of end-of-life EEE. • to establish separation facilities and centres covering the main residential and industrial areas of interest. • to radically reduce a final disposal of WEEE - landfilling;. • to organize public awareness campaigns; • to undertake WEEE pilot projects; • positively motivate consumers to change their habitudes towards WEEE handling. For accession countries as a most important is to prepare full transposition of new EU Waste Framework Directive (2008) and development of national regulation transposing EU regulation on WEEE. The adoption and implementation of adequate legislation should be considered as the first step. The follows should be aimed at relevant strategic documents, to develop an information system on e-waste, to ensure institutional arrangements systems in e-waste management and development of public awareness programmes. The countries should concentrate their activities on preparation and improvement of their legislation and related documents, on determine of their obligations and responsibilities, on development and implementing of the economic tools in all steps of e-waste management, to build local capacities for e-waste treatment and introduce of subsidies and incentives for establishment of new e-waste treatment facilities. The information system and verification of quality and reliability of dates will play a very important role. Table of contents Acknowledgement Project Summary Table of contents 2. Geographical and economic characteristic of the countries concerned 1 3. Legal framework of the electric and electronic waste 1 4. Identification and/or estimation of current and future waste streams: materials composition of current and future flows streams 17 5. Collection and collection systems, sorting and sorting systems: organization of national collection and sorting schemes, cost of the schemes, economic instruments to facilitate the collection and sorting, administrative requirements 40 6. Reuse possibilities: current levels of reuse of different WEEE, opportunities for greater reuse products or parts of products, barriers to greater reuse, and an example of the best and the worst practices in re-use schemes 104 7. Technology to treat, process or dispose of WEEE: capacities and inputs/outputs for existing technologies for sorting, treatment including recovery, recycling and disposal 113 8. Recycling and recycling scheme operation: organization of national recycling schemes, cost of the schemes, economic instruments to facilitate the recycling, administrative requirements 142 9. Disposal and disposal scheme operation: organization of national disposal schemes, cost of the schemes, economic instruments to facilitate the environmental sound disposal, administrative requirements 173 10. Recommendations – action to be taken 194 11. Conclusion 207 12. Literature 209 13. List of acronyms and abbreviations 211 UNEP(DEPI)/MED WG. 357/Inf. 11 Page 1 2. Geographical and economic characteristic of the countries concerned Country Capital Total country Country GDP (nominal) area [km2] population /capita [USD] Albania Tirana 28,748 3,659,616 3,911 Algeria Algiers 2,381,741 34,895,000 4,418 Bosnia and Herzegovina Sarajevo 51,129 4,613,414 4,278 Croatia Zagreb 56,594 4,489,409 14,243 Cyprus Nicosia 9,251 870,000 29,619 Egypt Cairo 1,002,45077,420,000 2,450 France Paris 674,843 65,447,374 42,747 Greece Athens 131,99011,306,183 29,635 Israel Jerusalem 22,0727,587,000
Recommended publications
  • Toward Zero Waste 2012
    zero waste framework toward zero waste 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Context: A Zero Waste Framework 6 Zero Waste – Pragmatic & Visionary 13 Global Principles for Zero Waste Communities 16 Zero Waste Business Principles 17 Cochrane’s Zero Waste Goal 19 Background Cochrane Waste Collection, Disposal and Diversion Programs 20 Town of Cochrane Waste Diversion Programs 32 Achieving Zero Waste 45 44 zerozero waste waste frameworkframework Executive Summary The Town of Cochrane provides weekly automated waste and recycling collection services through a contracted collection system to approximately 6000 households. The amount of waste collected and disposed has increased in conjunction with population growth, with approximately 2600 Metric Tonnes disposed of in 2011. Cochrane residents disposed of 138 kg per capita in 2011, compared to the Alberta residential waste disposal average of 289 kg per capita.1 This relatively low waste generation is largely due to the Town of Cochrane’s waste limit, curbside recycling program and convenient Cochrane Eco Centre programs. The waste limit encourages residents to take advantage of opportunities to reduce their waste as well as take advantage of waste diversion opportunities, such as recycling and composting. When the “Two Unit Limit” was instituted in 2005, there was a significant drop in waste generation, as Cochrane has continued to implement proactive waste management practices our waste generation rate has dropped from 224 kg per capita to today’s 138 kg per capita. Waste reduction programs in Cochrane are not directly targeted at the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) sector. The ICI sector does have access to the Cochrane Eco Centre and contributes to funding its operation through a monthly fee on utility bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article Perceived Value Influencing the Household Waste Sorting Behaviors in Rural China Ying Ma 1,2, Mansoor Ahmed Koondhar 1, Shengke Liu 1, Huiling Wang 1 and Rong Kong 1,* 1 School of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling 712100, China; [email protected] (Y.M.); [email protected] (M.A.K.); [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 School of Economics and Management, Xi’an Shiyou University, No. 18 Dianzi Road, Xi’an 710065, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 July 2020; Accepted: 19 August 2020; Published: 21 August 2020 Abstract: Waste sorting is the cardinal measurement to solve the problem of low efficiency of rural environmental governance and to alleviate environmental pollution by reduction, recycling, and harmlessness in rural areas. However, non-excludable and non-rival features of public goods easily cause a wide free-rider problem, which results in a low frequency of participation in the waste sorting of rural people. Based on the theory of the utility maximization of the rational economic man, this paper investigates survey data of 688 farm households in three cities and three counties of Shaanxi Province to explore the effect of the perceived value on the household waste classification behavior based on cost-benefit analysis. The results show that perceived benefit and perceived cost are important perceived value factors affecting farmers’ participation in waste sorting. Specifically, the spiritual benefit of the perceived benefit has a significantly positive impact on classification behavior, while the time cost, physical cost, and material cost of the perceived cost have a negative impact on waste classification behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Final 2014 Return Shares for Electronics Manufacturers Washington State Electronic Products Recycling Program 4/24/2014
    Final 2014 Return Shares for Electronics Manufacturers Washington State Electronic Products Recycling Program 4/24/2014 The E-Cycle Washington program conducted 42 sampling events in 2013 gathering data on over 13,600 TVs, monitors and computers. That data was used to determine Return Share by manufacturer, summarized below. Identified Proportional Total Manufacturer Name Weight (lbs) Brands Return Orphan* Return Share (%) Share (%) Share (%) 605484 92.80937069 Sony Electronics, Inc. 66834 11.04 0.86 11.89 Panasonic Corporation of North America 54226 8.96 0.69 9.65 Philips Electronics 47779 7.89 0.61 8.50 Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 43922 7.25 0.56 7.82 Dell Computer Corp. 43199 7.13 0.55 7.69 Thomson, Inc. USA 43078 7.11 0.55 7.67 Hewlett Packard 26370 4.36 0.34 4.69 JVC Americas Corp. 25979 4.29 0.33 4.62 Sharp Electronics Corporation 20274 3.35 0.26 3.61 Acer America Corp. 19327 3.19 0.25 3.44 LG Electronics USA, Inc. 18656 3.08 0.24 3.32 Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. 17906 2.96 0.23 3.19 Osram Sylvania 15226 2.51 0.19 2.71 Samsung Electronics Co. 14872 2.46 0.19 2.65 Apple 14537 2.40 0.19 2.59 Hitachi America, LTD. Digital Media Division 11235 1.86 0.14 2.00 ViewSonic Corp. World HQ 9934 1.64 0.13 1.77 Emerson Radio Corp. 7163 1.18 0.09 1.27 General Electric Co. 5691 0.94 0.07 1.01 NEC Display Solutions 4833 0.80 0.06 0.86 TMAX Digital, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Industrial Waste Management
    Overview of Industrial Waste Management Ajith de Alwis Chemical and Process Engineering Office of Science Technology and Innovation I N D Public Solid U Non W Hazardous S T PPP A R Y S Liquid B Private T A C E Hazardous K B Air O N E New Industries and Infrastructure • Ports and related infrastructure • Airports • Highways • Power stations – Coal • Industrial Estates • Export led manufacturing industries • Food Processing • Mineral Processing and Value Addition • Tourism • Urban growth - Metros • Nanoscience Park • Off shore Oil Exploration Analysis • Policy Aspects • Regulatory Environment • Human Resources Availability • Planning Aspects • Technology Aspects • Industry Mentality • Market requirements • Stakeholder requirements Policy Goals 1. Achieve Sustainable Development in Sri Lanka 2. Improve Environmental Quality throughout Sri Lanka 3. Improve eco-efficiency across all sectors of the economy in Sri Lanka 4. Alleviate Poverty and Improve the Living standards of all Sri Lankans 6 Prescribed Projects Approach to Environmental Protection Extreme Moderate No Change Change Change Government Authoritarian more than civil environmentalism society Government Moderate and Civil Environmentalism Society Civil Society Corporate Anti more than Environmentalism environmentalism Government EPL 6980 industries without an EPL Lankadeepa Oct 11, 2011 Illegal Dumping Due Diligence & LC Responsibility …. A Structural Failure ! BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN FINANCE DIRECTOR ACCOUNTANT GENERAL MANAGER CLERKS PRODUCTION & ADMINISTRATION MANAGER PROCESS
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Incineration and Informal Livelihoods: a Technical Guide on Waste-To-Energy Initiatives
    WIEGO Technical Brief No 11 August 2019 Waste Incineration and Informal Livelihoods: A Technical Guide on Waste-to-Energy Initiatives Jeroen IJgosse WIEGO Technical Briefs The global research-policy-action network Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO) Technical Briefs provide guides for both specialized and nonspecialized audiences. These are designed to strengthen understanding and analysis of the situation of those working in the informal economy as well as of the policy environment and policy options. About the Author: Jeroen IJgosse is a senior international solid waste management advisor, an urban environmental specialist, trainer and process facilitator with 25 years of experience in solid waste management in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe. He has worked extensively in the fields of planning, process facilitation, institutional strengthening, policy development, financial issues, due diligence assessment and inclusive processes involving informal actors in solid waste management. After 20 years living and working in Latin America, he currently resides in the Netherlands. Publication date: August, 2019 ISBN number: 978-92-95106-36-9 Please cite this publication as: IJgosse, Jeroen. 2019. Waste Incineration and Informal Livelihoods: A Technical Guide on Waste-to-Energy Initiatives. WIEGO Technical Brief No. 11. Manchester, UK: WIEGO. Series editor: Caroline Skinner Copy editor: Megan MacLeod Layout: Julian Luckham of Luckham Creative Cover photo: Waste pickers working at the Kpone Landfill in Tema, Ghana face the threat of losing access to waste for recycling. Photo: Dean Saffron Published by Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO) A Charitable Company Limited by Guarantee – Company No. 6273538, Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal
    Bid # 06-14 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS for Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal John P. Bohenko, City Manager City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Prepared by: City of Portsmouth Department of Public Works 680 Peverly Hill Road Portsmouth, NH 1 Bid # 06-14 TABLE OF CONTENTS INVITATION TO BID 3 INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS 4 AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 7 PROPOSAL FORM 9 BID SECURITY BOND 12 BIDDER'S QUALIFICATIONS 14 CONTRACT AGREEMENT 16 NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD 19 NOTICE TO PROCEED 20 CHANGE ORDER 21 LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND 22 MAINTENANCE BOND 25 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT 26 CONTRACTOR'S RELEASE 27 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 28 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 29 CONTROL OF WORK 31 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 33 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 34 BID ALTERNATES 38 SPECIFICATIONS: 011000 SUMMARY 42 013000 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 43 015050 PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT 44 017000 EXECUTION & CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 48 020500 DECONSTRUCTION 50 024119 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION 54 2 Bid # 06-14 Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal #06-14 INVITATION TO BID Sealed bid proposals, plainly marked, Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Project, Bid Proposal #06-14 on the outside of the mailing envelope as well as the sealed bid envelope, addressed to the Finance/Purchasing Department, City Hall, 1 Junkins Avenue, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801, will be accepted until 1:30 p.m. September 25, 2013 at which time all bids will be publicly opened and read aloud. A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held at 2:30 p.m., September 10th, 2013 beginning at the City DPW, 680 Peverly Hill Road, Portsmouth, NH, and proceeding to the two demolition sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter Legislation: a Toolkit for Policymakers
    Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Environment Programme. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, Kenya. Acknowledgments This report was developed by the Environmental Law Institute (ELI) for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). It was researched, drafted, and produced by Carl Bruch, Kathryn Mengerink, Elana Harrison, Davonne Flanagan, Isabel Carey, Thomas Casey, Meggan Davis, Elizabeth Hessami, Joyce Lombardi, Norka Michel- en, Colin Parts, Lucas Rhodes, Nikita West, and Sofia Yazykova. Within UNEP, Heidi Savelli, Arnold Kreilhuber, and Petter Malvik oversaw the development of the report. The authors express their appreciation to the peer reviewers, including Catherine Ayres, Patricia Beneke, Angela Howe, Ileana Lopez, Lara Ognibene, David Vander Zwaag, and Judith Wehrli. Cover photo: Plastics floating in the ocean The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the United Nations Environment Programme. © 2016. United Nations Environment Programme. Marine Litter Legislation: A Toolkit for Policymakers Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, Flows, and the Circular Economy Potential
    The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng Supporting Contributors: 2 The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng 3 With the current documented formal collection and recycling rate of 17.4%, a potential raw computers, printed wiring boards, connectors, relays, wires, and cables (McPherson, material value of $10 billion USD can be recovered from e-waste, and 4 Mt of secondary Thorpe, and Blake 2004 & Herat 2008). The recycling of plastic containing BFR represents a raw materials would become available for recycling. Focusing only on iron, aluminium, major challenge for e-waste recycling because of the costs related to the separation of plastic and copper and comparing emissions resulting from their use as virgin raw materials or containing PBDEs and PBBs from other plastic.
    [Show full text]
  • SUEZ Signs New Agreement for Industrial Wastewater Treatment Services to Expand Environmental Business to Fujian Province
    China, 13 May, 2021 SUEZ Signs New Agreement for Industrial Wastewater Treatment Services to Expand Environmental Business to Fujian Province SUEZ through its joint venture1 recently signed an agreement with Shaowu, Fujian Province to acquire 51% equity in Shaowu Wujiatang Wastewater Treatment Company Limited. Under this agreement, the joint venture will be responsible for the operation, management and technological re-engineering of the wastewater treatment plant in Jintang Industrial Park of Shaowu, to provide high quality industrial wastewater treatment services for Jintang Industrial Park and adjacent townships. This move will also facilitate protection of the local river ecosystem. Shaowu, a city in Nanping, lies in the north of Fujian province. The Futun river, one of three major river systems on the upper reaches of the Minjiang river, runs across Jintang Industrial Park in Shaowu. Thanks to abundant fluorite resources, Jintang Industrial Park was built to develop the local fluorine chemical industry. While the development supports restructuring of the manufacturing sector and product upgrades, it has more demanding requirements for the industrial park’s wastewater treatment services. The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Phase Ⅰ of Shaowu Wujiatang Wastewater Treatment Company Limited, which is in Jintang Industrial Park, provides wastewater treatment services exclusively for the park. The WWTP has a long-term treatment capacity target of 60,000 m3/day and a near-term target of 20,000 m3/day. The near-term target is expected to be achieved through expansion, by 2025. The WWTP’s current Phase I treatment capacity is 10,000 m3/day. Chemical wastewater often features complex composition, high salinity, toxic substances, low biodegradability, and fluctuating effluent quality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global E-Waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, Flows, and the Circular Economy Potential
    The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng Supporting Contributors: 2 The Global E-waste Monitor 2020 Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential Authors: Vanessa Forti, Cornelis Peter Baldé, Ruediger Kuehr, Garam Bel Contributions by: S. Adrian, M. Brune Drisse, Y. Cheng, L. Devia, O. Deubzer, F. Goldizen, J. Gorman, S. Herat, S. Honda, G. Iattoni, W. Jingwei, L. Jinhui, D.S. Khetriwal, J. Linnell, F. Magalini, I.C. Nnororm, P. Onianwa, D. Ott, A. Ramola, U. Silva, R. Stillhart, D. Tillekeratne, V. Van Straalen, M. Wagner, T. Yamamoto, X. Zeng 3 Copyright and publication information 4 Contact information: Established in 1865, ITU is the intergovernmental body responsible for coordinating the For enquiries, please contact the corresponding author C.P. Baldé via [email protected]. shared global use of the radio spectrum, promoting international cooperation in assigning satellite orbits, improving communication infrastructure in the developing world, and Please cite this publication as: establishing the worldwide standards that foster seamless interconnection of a vast range of Forti V., Baldé C.P., Kuehr R., Bel G. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: Quantities, communications systems. From broadband networks to cutting-edge wireless technologies, flows and the circular economy potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management
    Integrated Waste to Energy and Liquid Fuel Plants: Key to Sustainable Solid Waste Management Bary Wilson, Ph.D. Barry Liss, Ph.D., P.E Brandon Wilson, Ph.D., P.E May 2019 EnviroPower Renewable, Inc. 7301A Palmetto Parkway Rd. Suite 206B Boca Raton, FL 33433 www.eprenewable.com EPR Doc. 05212019 © 2019 EPR All Rights Reserved 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Plastics................................................................................................................................................... 5 Plastics Recycling................................................................................................................................... 6 Diesel Fuels ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Premium Diesel ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Biodiesel and Renewable Diesel ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction and Recycling Tips
    RETHINKING DEBRIS The Industry: Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction and recycling Tips An Opportunity There is money lying virtually ignored on the ground at construction and demolition sites across Wisconsin. Second-hand wood flooring, odd cut lumber, siding scraps, used asphalt shingles, surplus drywall, spent corrugated cardboard and other materials typically labeled waste have value that only a few enterprising companies appreciate. If your business builds, renovates or remodels anything from hospitals to single-family homes, furniture or playground equipment, read on. Find out how to put that money on the ground into your pocket, while helping to conserve natural resources. Wisconsin's Wastestream Precise figures are hard to come by, but industry experts estimate that construction waste and demolition debris (C & D) may account for more than a quarter of our nation's entire wastestream. In some areas of Wisconsin, such as Dane County, analysts estimate that up to 45 percent of all landfilled waste is construction and demolition debris. As disposal costs increase, businesses that divert more of their construction waste and demolition debris from the wastestream by reducing, reusing and recycling can save money and help stimulate markets to handle their wastes. In addition to profits, there is also the law to consider. The Waste Reduction and Recycling Law Wisconsin's Waste Reduction and Recycling Law, signed by Governor Tommy Thompson in 1990, was created to help change the state's throw-away habits. Items banned entirely from state landfills and municipal solid waste incinerators include: major appliances, used motor oil, lead-acid vehicle batteries, yard wastes, corrugated cardboard, office paper, magazines, newspaper, aluminum, steel, bi-metal and glass containers, plastic containers (PETE/#I & HDPE/#2) and waste tires.
    [Show full text]