DOCSLIB.ORG

Utilizing Extended Producer Responsibility Framework Laws to Achieve Zero Waste Anthony A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Utilizing Extended Producer Responsibility Framework Laws to Achieve Zero Waste Anthony A Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal Volume 6 Article 4 Issue 2 Pacific Region Edition June 2013 Where Will All the Waste Go?: Utilizing Extended Producer Responsibility Framework Laws to Achieve Zero Waste Anthony A. Austin Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/gguelj Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation 6 Golden Gate U. Envt'l L. J. 221 (2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at GGU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal by an authorized administrator of GGU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Austin: Zero Waste WHERE WILL ALL THE WASTE GO?: UTILIZING EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY FRAMEWORK LAWS TO ACHIEVE ZERO WASTE ANTHONY A. AUSTIN* I. INTRODUCTION The United States has a waste problem. It represents only five percent of the world population, yet it generates twenty-five to thirty percent of the world’s waste.1 In 2008, the United States generated 389.5 million tons of municipal solid waste (MSW).2 As our economy and population continue to grow, our waste will continue to grow as well.3 The obvious dilemma is that all of this waste, the byproduct of our economic advances, creates significant adverse environmental and public *Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable Diana L. Terry, Colorado Court of Appeals. J.D., Golden Gate University School of Law (2011); LL.M., Environmental and Natural Resources Law and Policy, University of Denver Sturm College of Law (2012). The author would like to thank his wife, Adrienne, colleague Luthien Niland, and Professor Justin Pidot for their endless support and assistance throughout this entire process, as well as the Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal editorial board and Professor Ed Baskauskas for their much appreciated editing. The author would also like to thank Professor Rock Pring for his encouragement and for making this article possible. The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of Judge Diana L. Terry or the Colorado Court of Appeals. 1 Robert Malone, World’s Worst Waste, FORBES.COM (May 24, 2006), www.forbes.com/2006/05/23/waste-worlds-worst-cx_rm_0524waste.html; BRENDA PLATT ET AL., INST. FOR LOCAL SELF-RELIANCE, STOP TRASHING THE CLIMATE 1 (2008), available at www.stoptrashingtheclimate.org/fullreport_stoptrashingtheclimate.pdf. 2 Rob van Haaren et al., 17th Nationwide Survey of MSW Management in the U.S.: The State of Garbage in America, 47 BIOCYCLE 16, 16 (2010), available at www.seas.columbia.edu/earth/wtert/sofos/SOG2010.pdf. 3 See 42 U.S.C.A. § 6901(a) (Westlaw 2013); Steffen Lehmann, Resource Recovery and Materials Flow in the City: Zero Waste and Sustainable Consumption as Paradigms in Urban Development, 11 SUSTAINABLE DEV. L. & POL’Y 28, 30 (2010). 221 Published by GGU Law Digital Commons, 2013 1 Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 6, Iss. 2 [2013], Art. 4 222 GOLDEN GATE UNIV. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW J. [Vol. 6 health effects when landfilled or incinerated.4 This Article explores the use of extended producer responsibility (EPR) laws to achieve the ultimate waste management goal: “zero waste.” Zero waste is achieved through the complete diversion of MSW from landfills and incinerators, resource conservation, and sustainable product redesign. Historically, MSW has been dumped in landfills or deposited in waste incinerators, practices that have allowed for robust commerce and economic growth. However, these typical waste management practices cause vast amounts of air, water, and soil pollution, increased greenhouse gas emissions, and other adverse environmental and public health issues associated with burying or burning our garbage. In response to these growing concerns, many cities and counties across the country have instituted zero waste policies by using recycling and composting and moving away from the common practices of burning or burying their waste. San Francisco’s zero waste policy is hailed as the most successful in the United States, with approximately seventy-seven percent diversion from landfills or incinerators.5 San Diego and Los Angeles each divert about two thirds of their waste; Seattle diverts about fifty-four percent.6 Despite the growing number of cities adopting zero waste policies, less than one quarter of all MSW generated in the United States is recycled or composted.7 Moreover, as cities strive toward achieving 100 percent diversion it will become much more difficult to actually achieve complete waste diversion. Design, cost, and technological impediments prevent complete waste diversion. Recycling or composting the remaining products in the waste stream is not possible due to product composition, the cost for localities to bear, or the localities’ lack of technological ability to recover all products in the waste stream. EPR laws, which require the remaining products in the waste stream to be taken back by their producers and require the producers to engage in mandated resource recovery, may provide the solution to attaining the zero waste goals. This Article proposes a hybrid approach, under which localities recycle and compost to the maximum extent practicable, and an additional EPR framework law targets the remaining products in the waste stream by requiring the producers to take them back. This use of an EPR law in conjunction with zero waste policies would have many environmental and public health benefits. 4 Lehmann, supra note 3, at 29. 5 David Ferry, The Urban Quest for “Zero” Waste, WALL ST. J., Sept. 12, 2011, at R7. 6 Id. 7 Van Haaren et al., supra note 2, at 20. This calculation is based on data from 2008. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/gguelj/vol6/iss2/4 2 Austin: Zero Waste 2013] ZERO WASTE 223 To best achieve these goals, an effective EPR approach must contain certain adaptable elements. States have already been playing an active role in adopting legislation to reduce waste and the various externalities associated with its disposal. States should continue to be the standard bearers in developing EPR framework laws. Any EPR law should rely on an adaptable “framework” mechanism that allows the state to more efficiently target products posing waste management, public health, and environmental problems. Such a law should also include mandatory resource recovery goals once the product is collected, penalty and enforcement provisions, and vest decision-making authority with the state’s selected agency as opposed to the state’s legislature. Although no such state EPR law currently exists, the landscape of EPR laws in the United States is changing rapidly. Generally, states target one product per law, thereby requiring the legislature to pass a new law every time a product causes waste management and environmental problems. As of January 2013, thirty-two states have adopted seventy-five EPR laws as part of their statewide waste management policies.8 In 2010, Maine became the first and only state in the nation to adopt a framework law that, in contrast to the prevailing product-by-product approach, utilizes an established set of factors to determine whether to include products in its EPR take-back program.9 Zero waste and EPR policies together can provide a solution to managing and preventing our increasing amounts of waste. Part II of this Article will explain how MSW is currently managed in the United States, what exactly MSW is and how much we are discarding or incinerating, as well as the environmental and public health impacts from our increasing amounts of waste. Part III will introduce and discuss the zero waste doctrine, its benefits, and the current status of zero waste policies in the United States. Part IV will then present the doctrine of EPR, its goals and purposes, and the necessary components of a successful EPR framework law. Finally, Part V will propose recommendations for future state EPR legislation and will also explore potential constitutional challenges to such EPR laws, as well as federal EPR legislation as an alternative. 8 Extended Producer Responsibility State Laws as of January 2013, PROD. STEWARDSHIP INST., www.productstewardship.us/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=280 (last visited Jan. 2013). 9 See Press Release, Prod. Policy Inst., First State Producer Responsibility “Framework” Law Passed in Maine with Unanimous Bi-Partisan and Chamber of Commerce Support (Mar. 25, 2010), available at www.productpolicy.org/ppi-press-release/first-state-producer-responsibility- framework-law-passed-maine-unanimous-bi-partis. Published by GGU Law Digital Commons, 2013 3 Golden Gate University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 6, Iss. 2 [2013], Art. 4 224 GOLDEN GATE UNIV. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW J. [Vol. 6 II. AN OVERVIEW OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE IN THE UNITED STATES The United States disposes of a staggering amount of MSW, despoiling the land, air, and water, while contributing to climate change. State and local governments have taken the lead in reducing disposal practices that cause these manifold problems. However, current policies have not, and likely cannot, fully address all the issues. Even the most aggressive efforts by municipalities to facilitate recycling and composting fail to achieve complete diversion.10 The EPA defines MSW as that which “we commonly use and throw away,” including “everyday items such as product packaging, grass clippings, furniture, clothing, bottles, food scraps, newspapers, appliances, batteries, and tires.”11 MSW in the United States is generally 10 This Article focuses on MSW and will not discuss the regulation or disposal of hazardous waste, which is managed through cooperative federalism between states and the federal government pursuant to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 6921-6939F (Westlaw 2013). While some solid waste products such as batteries and electronics contain hazardous materials, they will be included within the MSW group for the purposes of this Article.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Toward Zero Waste 2012
    zero waste framework toward zero waste 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 Context: A Zero Waste Framework 6 Zero Waste – Pragmatic & Visionary 13 Global Principles for Zero Waste Communities 16 Zero Waste Business Principles 17 Cochrane’s Zero Waste Goal 19 Background Cochrane Waste Collection, Disposal and Diversion Programs 20 Town of Cochrane Waste Diversion Programs 32 Achieving Zero Waste 45 44 zerozero waste waste frameworkframework Executive Summary The Town of Cochrane provides weekly automated waste and recycling collection services through a contracted collection system to approximately 6000 households. The amount of waste collected and disposed has increased in conjunction with population growth, with approximately 2600 Metric Tonnes disposed of in 2011. Cochrane residents disposed of 138 kg per capita in 2011, compared to the Alberta residential waste disposal average of 289 kg per capita.1 This relatively low waste generation is largely due to the Town of Cochrane’s waste limit, curbside recycling program and convenient Cochrane Eco Centre programs. The waste limit encourages residents to take advantage of opportunities to reduce their waste as well as take advantage of waste diversion opportunities, such as recycling and composting. When the “Two Unit Limit” was instituted in 2005, there was a significant drop in waste generation, as Cochrane has continued to implement proactive waste management practices our waste generation rate has dropped from 224 kg per capita to today’s 138 kg per capita. Waste reduction programs in Cochrane are not directly targeted at the Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional (ICI) sector. The ICI sector does have access to the Cochrane Eco Centre and contributes to funding its operation through a monthly fee on utility bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture Principles
    An Introduction by Damian Mason “Permaculture is a philosophy of working with, rather than against nature; of protracted and thoughtful observation rather than protracted and thoughtless labor; and of looking at plants and animals in all their functions, rather than treating everything as a single product system.” - Bill Mollison Organic Gardening Sustainable Cities Native Plants Food Banks & Gleaning Aquaponics Programs Greywater Systems Animals & Bee-Keeping Natural Buildings Disaster Relief & Preparedness Farmer’s Markets Conflict Resolution Slow Food Solutions to Climate Community Gardens Change Eco-villages & Cohousing Bioremediation Social Justice Beavers are a keystone species that turn deserts into gardens and mitigate drought & climate change. Uses local material to build home & makes habitat for many others as well. Shares lodge in winters. Hydrology 101: Slow it, Spread it, Sink it Take care of the earth. Leave it better than you found it. Care for all people. Return the surplus so that all may get a Fair Share. The focus is on creating a synergy where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.” By taking time to engage with nature we can design solutions that suit our particular situation. Example: Weed or medicinal herb? Consider a plant that, when used as a poultice, has the ability to radically speed up wound healing. When eaten they boost the immune system, while the seed heads produce the digestive aid psyllium husk. This remarkable plant is often found just outside of the back door. It is plantain, a plant we usually dismiss as a ‘weed’.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Contract Language to Improve Recycling
    DOWNSTREAM DUE DILIGENCE TO CREATE CLEAN AND MARKETABLE FEEDSTOCKS: USING CITY CODE AND CONTRACT LANGUAGE TO ACHIEVE RESPONSIBLE RECYCLING May 2020 This report is in support of King County’s Responsible Recycling Task Force, Task 5A, which explores using city code and city-hauler contract language to favor or require proper sorting, processing, and recycling of collected recyclable materials. Contract and code language should address all steps and parties in the material handling process including haulers, sorters, brokers, processors, and manufacturers who use recycled material. The report begins with a discussion of how we call out or identify proper recycling, some existing methods of codifying responsible recycling, general approaches for contract language, and some recommended sources for code and contract language. How Do We Know “Responsible Recycling” When We See It When we sort materials for recycling, we expect they will be processed in ways that conserve resources and protect human health and safety. However, different materials have different recycling pathways, which can change often. Markets fluctuate and brokers react. This makes it difficult to identify the final processor or end-user of a material, and therefore hard to assess if the process is environmentally and socially responsible. City codes and city-hauler contracts can be used to define proper recycling or specify environmental and human health practices necessary for proper recycling. Different cities and organizations use various strategies to identify and establish proper recycling outcomes: • Washington State’s Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC) requires that “local markets” be used whenever possible. • Bothell’s Recology contract states that electronics & small appliance processors must be "fully-permitted and properly operated" and "legitimate".
    [Show full text]
  • Choosing a Soil Amendment Fact Sheet No
    Choosing a Soil Amendment Fact Sheet No. 7.235 Gardening Series|Basics by J.G. Davis and D. Whiting* A soil amendment is any material added not be used as a soil amendment. Don’t add Quick Facts to a soil to improve its physical properties, sand to clay soil — this creates a soil structure such as water retention, permeability, water similar to concrete. • On clayey soils, soil infiltration, drainage, aeration and structure. Organic amendments increase soil amendments improve the The goal is to provide a better environment organic matter content and offer many soil aggregation, increase for roots. benefits. Over time, organic matter improves porosity and permeability, and To do its work, an amendment must be soil aeration, water infiltration, and both improve aeration, drainage, thoroughly mixed into the soil. If it is merely water- and nutrient-holding capacity. Many and rooting depth. buried, its effectiveness is reduced, and it will organic amendments contain plant nutrients interfere with water and air movement and and act as organic fertilizers. Organic matter • On sandy soils, soil root growth. also is an important energy source for amendments increase the Amending a soil is not the same thing bacteria, fungi and earthworms that live in water and nutrient holding as mulching, although many mulches also the soil. capacity. are used as amendments. A mulch is left on the soil surface. Its purpose is to reduce Application Rates • A variety of products are available bagged or bulk for evaporation and runoff, inhibit weed growth, Ideally, the landscape and garden soils and create an attractive appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Compost? Compost Pile?
    What Do I How Do I Need to Make Start My Compost? Compost Pile? Start by picking a location. When Here’s What You Need… choosing a location look for one that is: • Well-drained and close to level • In partial shade, to help with Composting water retention • At least 1-foot away from walls, What is Composting? fences, bushes, trees etc. • A convenient spot to place Compost is a dark brown, earthy, Other You May Want to Consider: materials and to get the end crumbly material consisting of • Compost pile location product to its final location decomposed organic matter. • How quickly you want the Once you choose your location you Benefits of Composted Material: materials to breakdown will want to loosen the soil so that When added to soil, compost • How you plan to use your your compost will come into improves soil by helping with finished compost contact with the soil. both its porosity and water Other tools you may want to help retention, while providing you get started: essential nutrients plants require. Now You’re Ready Composting also diverts waste • Compost bin to Begin Your Compost Pile! from the waste stream and our • Pitchfork (compost turner) landfills! • Probe thermometer How does Material Decompose? • Chipper/shredder Thousands of Microorganisms • Wheelbarrow (for transport) work to break down the material. If conditions are properly managed we can speed up the Contact The Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Sustainability Division, for More Information: process. Phone: 207-592-0455 Mail: 17 SHS Augusta, ME Building Your Compost Pile Once you have loosened up the soil at your location, you may want to pile 4” to 6” layer of twigs on top of the plot to encourage airflow at the bottom of the pile.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal
    Bid # 06-14 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS for Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal John P. Bohenko, City Manager City of Portsmouth, New Hampshire Prepared by: City of Portsmouth Department of Public Works 680 Peverly Hill Road Portsmouth, NH 1 Bid # 06-14 TABLE OF CONTENTS INVITATION TO BID 3 INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS 4 AWARD AND EXECUTION OF CONTRACT 7 PROPOSAL FORM 9 BID SECURITY BOND 12 BIDDER'S QUALIFICATIONS 14 CONTRACT AGREEMENT 16 NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD 19 NOTICE TO PROCEED 20 CHANGE ORDER 21 LABOR AND MATERIALS PAYMENT BOND 22 MAINTENANCE BOND 25 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT 26 CONTRACTOR'S RELEASE 27 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 28 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 29 CONTROL OF WORK 31 TEMPORARY FACILITIES 33 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 34 BID ALTERNATES 38 SPECIFICATIONS: 011000 SUMMARY 42 013000 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 43 015050 PROJECT WASTE MANAGEMENT 44 017000 EXECUTION & CLOSEOUT REQUIREMENTS 48 020500 DECONSTRUCTION 50 024119 SELECTIVE STRUCTURE DEMOLITION 54 2 Bid # 06-14 Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Bid Proposal #06-14 INVITATION TO BID Sealed bid proposals, plainly marked, Water Treatment Plant Deconstruction and Demolition Project, Bid Proposal #06-14 on the outside of the mailing envelope as well as the sealed bid envelope, addressed to the Finance/Purchasing Department, City Hall, 1 Junkins Avenue, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801, will be accepted until 1:30 p.m. September 25, 2013 at which time all bids will be publicly opened and read aloud. A mandatory pre-bid meeting will be held at 2:30 p.m., September 10th, 2013 beginning at the City DPW, 680 Peverly Hill Road, Portsmouth, NH, and proceeding to the two demolition sites.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPOST FEASIBILITY STUDY April 2017
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPOST FEASIBILITY STUDY April 2017 COMMISSIONED BY: District of Columbia Department of Public Works PREPARED BY: 416 LONGSHORE DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 734.996.1361 RECYCLE.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 7 Current Operations ................................................................................................................................... 8 SSO Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Processing ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Organics Collection ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Processing Technology ................................................................................................................................ 14 Organics Outreach ....................................................................................................................................... 16 SSO Curbside Collection Modeling .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SUEZ Signs New Agreement for Industrial Wastewater Treatment Services to Expand Environmental Business to Fujian Province
    China, 13 May, 2021 SUEZ Signs New Agreement for Industrial Wastewater Treatment Services to Expand Environmental Business to Fujian Province SUEZ through its joint venture1 recently signed an agreement with Shaowu, Fujian Province to acquire 51% equity in Shaowu Wujiatang Wastewater Treatment Company Limited. Under this agreement, the joint venture will be responsible for the operation, management and technological re-engineering of the wastewater treatment plant in Jintang Industrial Park of Shaowu, to provide high quality industrial wastewater treatment services for Jintang Industrial Park and adjacent townships. This move will also facilitate protection of the local river ecosystem. Shaowu, a city in Nanping, lies in the north of Fujian province. The Futun river, one of three major river systems on the upper reaches of the Minjiang river, runs across Jintang Industrial Park in Shaowu. Thanks to abundant fluorite resources, Jintang Industrial Park was built to develop the local fluorine chemical industry. While the development supports restructuring of the manufacturing sector and product upgrades, it has more demanding requirements for the industrial park’s wastewater treatment services. The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Phase Ⅰ of Shaowu Wujiatang Wastewater Treatment Company Limited, which is in Jintang Industrial Park, provides wastewater treatment services exclusively for the park. The WWTP has a long-term treatment capacity target of 60,000 m3/day and a near-term target of 20,000 m3/day. The near-term target is expected to be achieved through expansion, by 2025. The WWTP’s current Phase I treatment capacity is 10,000 m3/day. Chemical wastewater often features complex composition, high salinity, toxic substances, low biodegradability, and fluctuating effluent quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction and Recycling Tips
    RETHINKING DEBRIS The Industry: Construction and Demolition Waste Reduction and recycling Tips An Opportunity There is money lying virtually ignored on the ground at construction and demolition sites across Wisconsin. Second-hand wood flooring, odd cut lumber, siding scraps, used asphalt shingles, surplus drywall, spent corrugated cardboard and other materials typically labeled waste have value that only a few enterprising companies appreciate. If your business builds, renovates or remodels anything from hospitals to single-family homes, furniture or playground equipment, read on. Find out how to put that money on the ground into your pocket, while helping to conserve natural resources. Wisconsin's Wastestream Precise figures are hard to come by, but industry experts estimate that construction waste and demolition debris (C & D) may account for more than a quarter of our nation's entire wastestream. In some areas of Wisconsin, such as Dane County, analysts estimate that up to 45 percent of all landfilled waste is construction and demolition debris. As disposal costs increase, businesses that divert more of their construction waste and demolition debris from the wastestream by reducing, reusing and recycling can save money and help stimulate markets to handle their wastes. In addition to profits, there is also the law to consider. The Waste Reduction and Recycling Law Wisconsin's Waste Reduction and Recycling Law, signed by Governor Tommy Thompson in 1990, was created to help change the state's throw-away habits. Items banned entirely from state landfills and municipal solid waste incinerators include: major appliances, used motor oil, lead-acid vehicle batteries, yard wastes, corrugated cardboard, office paper, magazines, newspaper, aluminum, steel, bi-metal and glass containers, plastic containers (PETE/#I & HDPE/#2) and waste tires.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Demolition Wastes and Clean Rubble Technical Guidance Document SW-1994-G2
    Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Waste Management 1000 SW Jackson, Suite 320, Topeka, Kansas 66612-1366 Construction and Demolition Wastes and Clean Rubble Technical Guidance Document SW-1994-G2 Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste is solid waste generated during construction or demolition activities. Clean rubble is also generated during construction or demolition activities, but it differs in composition from C&D waste. This document explains the definitions of C&D waste and clean rubble and acceptable methods for disposal of both. Construction and Demolition Waste Definition of C&D waste C&D waste is defined in KSA 65-3402 (u) as: • solid waste resulting from the construction, remodeling, repair and demolition of structures, roads, sidewalks and utilities; • untreated wood and untreated sawdust from any source; • treated wood from construction or demolition projects; • small amounts of municipal solid waste generated by the consumption of food and drinks at construction or demolition sites, including, but not limited to, cups, bags and bottles; • furniture and appliances from which ozone depleting chlorofluorocarbons have been removed in accordance with the provisions of the federal clean air act; • solid waste consisting of motor vehicle window glass; and • solid waste consisting of vegetation from land clearing and grubbing, utility maintenance, and seasonal or storm related cleanup. Such wastes include, but are not limited to, bricks, concrete, and other masonry materials, roofing materials, soil, rock, wood, wood products, wall or floor coverings, plaster, drywall, plumbing fixtures, electrical wiring, electrical components containing no hazardous materials, non-asbestos insulation and construction related packaging. Other statutes and regulations further refine the definition: Construction related packaging means small quantities of packaging wastes that are generated in the construction, remodeling or repair of structures and related appurtenances.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction, Deconstruction, and Demolition Recycling Guide
    Construction, Deconstruction, and demolition GUIDE FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY www.smcsustainability.org 888-442-2666 Frequently Asked Questions WHAT DOES C&D STAND FOR? WHAT DOES OX MOUNTAIN LANDFILL ACCEPT Construction and Demolition. FOR RECYCLING? Ox Mountain Landfill accepts loads of certain WHY IS IT IMPORTANT THAT C&D WASTE BE materials for reuse on site. These materials are: RECYCLED? asphalt, bricks, concrete, dirt, fines, rock, sand, soil, A lot of natural resources can be saved by recycling stone, and untreated wood. C&D waste, which makes up 29% of the materials Mixed loads with untreated wood and/or green waste going into the landfill. mixed with inerts (asphalt, brick, concrete, dirt, fines, rock, sand, soil, and stone) will not be sorted and DO ALL THE CITIES HAVE THE SAME RECYCLING therefore NOT RECYCLED, but landfilled. REQUIREMENTS? However, a load with mixed inerts only (asphalt, brick, No. All cities require a minimum of California Green concrete, dirt, fines, rock, sand, soil, and stone) will be Building Standards Code (CALGreen) detailed below. accepted for Alternative Daily Landfill Cover. Local ordinances or building regulations may have more stringent requirements and may have different WHAT IS ALTERNATIVE DAILY COVER? penalties. Refer to the chart on pages 2-3 for details Alternative daily cover (ADC) means cover material on a specific city. other than earthen material placed on the surface of the active face of a municipal solid waste landfill at WHAT ARE THE CALGREEN REQUIREMENTS? the end of each operating day to control vectors, fires, CALGreen requires that the following projects recycle odors, blowing litter, and scavenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Anaerobic Digestion? Anaerobic Digestion Occurs Naturally, in the Absence of Oxygen, As Bacteria Break Down Organic Materials and Produce Biogas
    The Benefits of Anaerobic Digestion of Food Waste At Wastewater Treatment Facilities Why Anaerobic Digestion? Anaerobic digestion occurs naturally, in the absence of oxygen, as bacteria break down organic materials and produce biogas. The process reduces the amount of material and produces biogas, which can be used as an energy source. This technology is commonly used throughout the United States to break down sewage sludge at wastewater treatment facilities. In the past few years, there has been a movement to start adding food waste to anaerobic digesters already in place at wastewater treatment facilities. The anaerobic digestion of food waste has many benefits, including: • Climate Change Mitigation – Food waste in landfills generates methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Diverting food waste from landfills to wastewater treatment facilities allows for the capture of the methane, which can be used as an energy source. In addition to decreased methane emissions at landfills, there are greenhouse gas emissions reductions due to the energy offsets provided by using an on-site, renewable source of energy. • Economic Benefits – Wastewater treatment facilities can expect to see cost savings from incorporating food waste into anaerobic digesters. These include reduced energy costs due to production of on-site power and tipping fee for accepting the food waste. • Diversion Opportunities – Most municipalities are investing in ways to divert materials from landfills. This is usually due to reduced landfill space and/or recycling goals. Wastewater treatment facilities offer the opportunity to divert large amounts of food waste, one of the largest waste streams still going to landfills. Why Food Waste? Food waste is the second largest category of municipal solid waste (MSW) sent to landfills in the United States, accounting for approximately 18% of the waste stream.
    [Show full text]