House Floor Plans with Loft
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Re-Thinking Loft Buildings in the Scope of Housing Production in Turkey
ARTICLE MEGARON 2015;10(4):479-493 DOI: 10.5505/MEGARON.2015.04127 Re-Thinking Loft Buildings in the Scope of Housing Production in Turkey* Türkiye’de Konut Üretimi Kapsamında Loft Binaları Yeniden Düşünmek* Neslinur HIZLI, Burçin MIZRAK ABSTRACT ÖZ In an age of rapid urbanization, the question of how housing Hızlı kentleşmenin olduğu bir çağda, konutların, şehirlerin ar- should respond to increasing, changing demands of cities has tan ve değişen ihtiyaçlarına nasıl cevap vereceği keşfedilmesi become crucial. The aim of the present study was to re-envi- gereken önemli bir sorun olmaktadır. Bu bildiri, bu ihtiyaçlara sion the role of the loft building in housing production in Tur- cevap verebilmek açısından loft binaların konut üretimindeki key in terms of responding to those needs, and to discuss loft yerini yeniden düşünmeyi ve loft binaları ‘uyumluluk, değişebi- buildings within the context of an open building–embodying lirlik ve esneklik’ kavramlarını da içinde barındıran ‘açık yapı’ adaptability, variability, and flexibility. To do so, literature was konsepti üzerinden tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, il- reviewed, and six examples, three national and three interna- gili yazın taranmış ve üçü yurtiçi, üçü yurtdışından olmak üzere tional, were analyzed. Two interviews were conducted, one altı örnek analiz edilmiştir. Biri, örnek loft binamızın tasarım with a member of a design team, and one with a user of loft ekibinden, bir diğeri de kullanıcısı olmak üzere iki kişi ile rö- examples. The study demonstrates that loft buildings embody the fundamentals of the open building concept, with high portaj yapılmıştır. Çalışma göstermiştir ki, loft binalar yüksek ceilings and structural systems that provide interior space duvarları ve iç mekânı bölmeyen taşıyıcı sistemleriyle açık yapı without division, but which diverge from the concept due to konseptinin temel özelliklerini içinde barındırırken, cephedeki restrictions in their facades. -
The Breezeway Building 2345 S Alma School Road Mesa, Az 85210
FOR LEASE THE BREEZEWAY BUILDING 2345 S ALMA SCHOOL ROAD MESA, AZ 85210 PROPERTY FEATURES + Availabilities: Suite 102: ±1,555 SF; $17.00/SF Full Service + Part of a ±21,710 SF professional office building + Covered parking available + Excellent location - just minutes from US-60 + Lush landscaping, garden courtyard environment + Frontage on Alma School Road + Shared conference room available for tenant use CONTACT US BRUCE SUPPES JAMIE SWIRTZ Vice President Senior Associate 602 735 1926 602 735 5630 [email protected] [email protected] www.cbre.us/phoenix FOR LEASE 2345 S Alma School Road THE BREEZEWAY BUILDING Mesa, AZ 85210 2345 S. ALMA SCHOOL ROAD not to scale © 2020 CBRE, Inc. All rights reserved. This information has been obtained from sources believed reliable, but has not been verified for accuracy or completeness. You should conduct a careful, independent investigation of the property and verify all information. Any reliance on this information is solely at your own risk. CBRE and the CBRE logo are service marks of CBRE, Inc. All other marks displayed on this document are the property of their respective owners, and use of such logos does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement of CBRE. Photos herein are the property of their respective owners. Use of these images without the express written consent of the owner is prohibited. www.cbre.us/phoenix FOR LEASE 23452345 S S.Alma Alma School School Road Rd. THE BREEZEWAY BUILDING Mesa, AZ 85210 FLOOR PLANS OFFICE OFFICE 14’3 x 12’3 13’3 x 12’3 Suite 102 ±1,555 SF KITCHEN FUTURE 7’8 x 7’1 OFFICE 11’9 x 11’5 TOUR SUITE 102 CONFERENCE 11’5 x 15’8 FUTURE OFFICE 11’9 x 11’5 OFFICE RECEPTION 13’6 x 12’7 14’ x 15’9 N not to scale all measurements are approximate www.cbre.us/phoenix. -
Northwest Rooms Upper Breezeway Design Improvements
NORTHWEST ROOMS UPPER BREEZEWAY DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS Revised Certificate of Approval Application 305 Harrison St. Seattle, WA 98109 September 4, 2020 DLR Group 51 University Street, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98108 www.dlrgroup.com t 206.461.6000 Table of Contents Section 1 1 Cover Sheet 2 Project Information 3 Comparative Tabulation of Scope of Work Section 2 4 Existing Site Plan 5 Existing Conditions 7 Floor Plans - Demo & Proposed 8 Reflected Ceiling Plans - Demo & Proposed 9 North Elevations - Demo & Proposed 10 South Elevations - Demo & Proposed 11 N-S Building Section - Demo & Proposed 12 N-S Building Section - Demo & Proposed 13 Partial Enlarged Elevation - Proposed 14 Partial Enlarged Building Section - Proposed 15 Exterior Details - Proposed Section 3 18 NW View - Existing 19 NW View - Proposed 20 SE View - Existing 21 SE View - Proposed 22 Materials and Finishes Section 4 24 Lighting - Location of Fixtures 25 Lighting - Fixtures 9.4.2020 | 1 SECTION 1 | PROJECT INFORMATION DESCRIPTION GOALS The Northwest Rooms Breezeway is one of two entrances to the Seattle Center De-clutter and simplify breezeway campus from the corner of West Republican Street and Warren Ave. N. • Remove recent alterations and additions in favor of Thiry’s original mid-century modernist design. The current breezeway configuration was created in the early 1990s by demolishing a portion of the adjacent structure, the Nisqually Room and enlarging a small, existing breezeway. As a part of the same project, swooping canopies, neon lights, skylights, new paving, aluminum wall cladding, and ticket and concession spaces were constructed. Over the years, the breezeway space has deteriorated and the 1990s improvements have become worn and dated. -
THE GILDED GARDEN Historic Ornament in the Landscape at Montgomery Place
DED GA GIL RD E E H N T Historic Ornament in the Landscape at Montgomery Place May 25 – October 31, 2019 1 THE GILDED GARDEN Historic Ornament in the Landscape at Montgomery Place In 1841, the renowned American architect Alexander Jackson Davis (1803–92) was hired to redesign the Mansion House at Montgomery Place, as well as consult on the surrounding grounds. Between 1841 and 1844, Davis introduced the property owners Louise Livingston, her daughter Cora, and son-in-law Thomas Barton to Exhibition produced in partnership with and curated by landscape designer, editor, and writer Andrew Jackson Downing (1815–52), the Barbara Israel and her staff from Barbara Israel Garden Antiques seminal figure now regarded by historians as the father of American landscape architecture. Downing had learned practical planting know-how at his family’s nursery, but he was more than an expert on botanical species. He was also a Funding provided by the A. C. Israel Foundation and tastemaker of the highest order who did more to influence the way Americans Plymouth Hill Foundation designed their properties than anyone else before or since. Raised in Newburgh, Downing was intensely devoted to the Hudson Valley region and was dedicated to his family’s nursery business there. In the 1830s, Downing began to make a name for himself as a writer, and contributed multiple articles on horticulture to various periodicals. Downing’s enormously influential work,A Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Landscape Gardening, Adapted to North America was published in 1841. It contained descriptions of the proper use of ornament, the importance of coherent design, use of native trees and plants, and his most important principle—that, when it came to designing a landscape, nature should be elevated and interpreted, not slavishly copied. -
RESIDENCES Prefaces
LOFT RESIDENCES Prefaces Loft Residences Copyright © Artpower International Publishing Co., Ltd. Designer: Chen Ting Chief Editor: Li Aihong Address: Room C, 9/F., Sun House, 181 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong, China Tel: 852-31840676 Fax: 852-25432396 Editorial Department: Address: G009, Floor 7th, Yimao Centre, Meiyuan Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, China Tel: 86-755-82913355 Fax: 86-755-82020029 Web: www.artpower.com.cn E-mail: [email protected] ISBN 978-988-13541-7-4 No part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission of the publisher. All images in this book have been reproduced with the knowledge and prior consent of the designers and the clients concerned, and every effort has been made to ensure that credits accurately comply with information applied. No responsibility is accepted by producer, publisher, or printer for any infringement of copyright or otherwise arising from the contents of this publication. Printed in China Contents 008 Industrial Loft 110 God’s Loftstory 012 Loft Vila Leopoldina 116 Grey Loft 016 Chelsea Loft Residence 122 Black & White Loft 020 St. Pancras Penthouse Apartment 128 Sagaoponak Cottage 026 Real Parque Loft 132 R1T Apartment 030 Loft in Turin 136 Hudson Valley Residence 036 Loft in Terrassa 140 Yndo Loft 042 South Park Loft 144 Henley Park Coach House 048 Warren Mews Loft 150 Greenwich Street Loft 052 Industrial -
Insulating Thatched Roofs This Guidance Note Has Been Prepared and Edited by David Pickles
Energy Efficiency and Historic Buildings Insulating Thatched Roofs This guidance note has been prepared and edited by David Pickles. It forms one of a series of thirteen guidance notes covering the thermal upgrading of building elements such as roofs, walls and floors. First published by English Heritage March 2012. This edition (v1.1) published by Historic England April 2016. All images © Historic England unless otherwise stated. Illustrations drawn by Simon Revill. Our full range of guidance on energy efficiency can be found at: HistoricEngland.org.uk/energyefficiency Front cover: Thatch repairs in progress. © Philip White. Summary This guidance provides advice on the principles, risks, materials and methods for insulating thatched roofs. There are estimated to be about fifty thousand thatched buildings in England today, some of which retain thatch which is over six hundred years old. Thatching reflects strong vernacular traditions all over the country. Well-maintained thatch is a highly effective weatherproof coating as traditional deep thatched eaves will shed rainwater without the need for any down pipes or gutters. Locally grown thatch is a sustainable material, which has little impact on the environment throughout its life-cycle. It requires no chemicals to grow, can be harvested by hand or using traditional farm machinery, requires no mechanical processing and therefore has low embodied energy and can be fixed using hand tools. At the end of its life it can be composted and returned to the land. Thatch has a much greater insulating value than any other traditional roof covering. With the right choice of material and detailing, a well-maintained thatched roof will keep a building warm in winter and cool in summer and has the added advantage of being highly sound-proof. -
ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS
JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS JULY 2004 ASSESSMENT of the POTENTIAL ROLE of LIVE/WORK DEVELOPMENT in CENTERS Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of transportation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. -
Easy Loft BBA Certificate
APPROVAL INSPECTION Carpenter Ltd TESTING CERTIFICATION Dinting Lodge Industrial Estate TECHNICAL APPROVALS FOR CONSTRUCTION Glossop Derbyshire SK13 6LE Agrément Certificate Tel: 01457 861141 Fax: 01457 892424 e-mail: [email protected] 10/4764 website: www.carpenter.com Product Sheet 1 CARPENTER LOFT INSULATION EASY LOFT FOR LOFT APPLICATIONS PRODUCT SCOPE AND SUMMARY OF CERTIFICATE This Certificate relates to Easy Loft for Loft Applications, for use between and over ceiling joists in ventilated or unventilated pitched roofs in dwellings or buildings of similar occupancy. AGRÉMENT CERTIFICATION INCLUDES: • factors relating to compliance with Building Regulations where applicable • factors relating to additional non-regulatory information where applicable • independently verified technical specification • assessment criteria and technical investigations • design considerations • installation guidance • regular surveillance of production • formal three-yearly review. KEY FACTORS ASSESSED λ –1 –1 Thermal performance — the product has a thermal conductivity ( 90/90) of 0.045 W·m ·K and when installed between and over ceiling joists, can enable roofs to achieve typical design U values less than 0.14 W·m2·K. (see section 5). Condensation — the product can contribute to limiting the risk of surface condensation and, for the purposes of assessing the risk of interstitial condensation, the product’s vapour resistivity may be taken as approximately 11 MN·s·g–1·m–1 (see section 6). Behaviour in relation to fire — the product will not contribute to the development stages of a fire (see section 7). Durability — the product is stable, rot-proof and durable and will remain effective as an insulant for the life of the building in which it is installed (see section 10) The BBA has awarded this Agrément Certificate to the company named above for the product described herein. -
Architectural Standards for Major Subdivisions
ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS Prologue The intent of the Architectural Standards for Major Subdivisions is to ensure that the Town’s newest neighborhoods meet a required level of quality and reflect and enhance Carrboro’s unique appeal. To that end, architectural design criteria are included in the review process for new subdivisions. These standards are not intended to dampen architectural creativity or diversity but rather to provide a framework within which to work. Housing developed by nonprofit organizations intended for first-time homebuyers earning less than 80% of our area’s median income is exempt from these provisions. Contents 1. Procedure 2. Definitions 3. General Design Standards for all major subdivisions 4. Vernacular Architectural Standards 5. Alternative Architectural Standards Appendix: Glossary A glossary of architectural terms and illustrations can be found in the Appendix. It is available for use by architects and developers in their interpretation of these standards. 1. Procedure The applicant shall address the architectural design of houses in the proposed subdivision according to the General Residential Design Standards (GDS), and then shall meet either the Vernacular Architectural Standards (VAS) or Alternative Architectural Standards (AAS). The Town’s administrative staff and the Appearance Commission may consult a licensed architect to help them determine whether the plans submitted meet the intent of the General Design Standards, and whether they meet either the Vernacular Architectural Standards or Alternative Architectural Standards. 2. Definitions Contemporary Architecture: describes a building that is derived from current ideas of architectural form, construction and detailing. Context: the surrounding buildings and land forms, the social and the built history of the location. -
Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight
Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Transit Authorities Fiscal Year 2019 Report A Report by the Florida Transportation Commission Commission Members Ronald Howse Jay Trumbull John Browning Chairman Vice Chairman Richard Burke Julius Davis David Genson Teresa Sarnoff www.ftc.state.fl.us 605 Suwannee Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0450, MS 9 (850) 414-4105 * Fax (850) 414-4234 Florida Transportation Commission iii Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight-Transit Authorities Page Fiscal Year 2019 Fiscal Year Report Annual 2019 Fiscal Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight This page intentionally left blank. Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report Page iv Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report Page v Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight This page intentionally left blank. Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report Page vi Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report Page 1 Transportation Authority Monitoring and Oversight • Granting, denial, suspension, or revocation of Executive Summary any license or permit issued by FDOT Background The Commission may, however, recommend standards and policies governing the procedure for selection and prequalification of consultants and The Florida Transportation Commission contractors. (Commission) was charged with an expanded oversight role as a result of provisions contained in The Commission, in concert with the designated House Bill (HB) 985 that was passed by the 2007 authorities, adopted performance measures and legislature. This legislation amended Section objectives, operating indicators, and governance 20.23, Florida Statutes, requiring the Commission criteria to assess the overall responsiveness of to monitor the transportation authorities each authority in meeting their responsibilities to established in Chapters 343 and 348, Florida their customers. -
ADR-Loft Haus-11-1-16-NEW.Indd
H+dlT collaborative, llc EDG - ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW - LOFT HAUS 3420 15TH AVENUE W. SEATTLE, WA 98119 11.18.2016 DPD PROJECT# 3014491 LEFT BLANK H+dlT collaborative, llc EDG - ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW - LOFT HAUS 3420 15TH AVENUE W. SEATTLE, WA 98119 11.18.2016 DPD PROJECT# 3014491 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT GOALS 1 CONTEXT ANALYSIS SITE CONTEXT 2-5 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 6-7 SITE ANALYSIS 8-9 ZONING ANALYSIS 10 DESIGN PROCESS DESIGN PROCESS 11-12 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT SITE PLAN 13 FLOOR PLANS 14-17 SECTION 18 ELEVATIONS 19-22 3D PERSPECTIVE VIEWS 23-25 DESIGN GUIDELINES PERTINENT DESIGN GUIDELINES 26 DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND IMAGES 27 DEPARTURE REQUESTS 28 SHADOW STUDIES 29 H+dlT collaborative, llc EDG - ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW - LOFT HAUS 3420 15TH AVENUE W. SEATTLE, WA 98119 11.18.2016 DPD PROJECT# 3014491 1 PROJECT GOALS The 3420 15th Avenue West site is located along an active commercial corridor at the intersection of three neighborhoods: North Queen Anne, Interbay, and Ballard to the north. The area is composed of both single-family residents and multi-unit buildings (30% - 70%). The project team will seek to design a multi-unit develop- ment with 39 small effi ciency dwelling units (SEDUs). We will strive to enhance the existing neighborhood context. CONTEXT FISHERMEN’S TERMINAL Our intent is to interpret the community, history and character of the site in order to create an appealing and lasting design. We want to offer a smart and effi cient layout with a unit mix that will be attractive to new and existing residents. -
Architectural Styles/Types
Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.