DOCSLIB.ORG

Paolo Sarpi, the Absolutist State and the Territoriality of the Adriatic Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Paolo Sarpi, the Absolutist State and the Territoriality of the Adriatic Sea Erasmo Castellani Paolo Sarpi, the Absolutist State and the Territoriality of the Adriatic Sea The years between the second half of the sixteenth century and the first few decades of the seventeenth constituted a period of general reconfiguration throughout the Mediterranean. The hegemonic position held by Venice from centuries on the Adriatic Sea, or “the Venetian Gulf”, as it was called, started to be disputed persistently by other powers. The Dominio da mar, the Venetian territories in the Mediterranean – and Venice itself – were not living their best times: Venice was still recovering from the terrible wounds inflicted by the Ottoman Empire in the 1570s, and trying to solve the tragic loss of Cyprus, extremely significant for the Republic not only in terms of resources and men, but also for its political value and reputation. The Turks, who had represented the main threat for the Venetian maritime territories from the end of the fourteenth century, were worn-out too by the intense and truculent decade, and after 1573 (the so-called war of Cyprus), did not engage in seafaring wars with Venice until 1645 with the Cretean wars. The Uskok corsairs, who enjoyed the support of the Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, officially to fight the Turks, tormented Venice and its territories on the Dalmatian coast between the 1580s and 1610s, raiding villages, cargos and, in general, making the Adriatic routes less and less secure. The Uskoks, as the Barbary corsairs, represented not only a harmful presence on the sea, but also an economic and political threat for Venice: corsairs activities in fact offered to the Venetian subjects on the 1 Dalmatian coast opportunities to engage in small commercial enterprises without being submitted to the Serenissima’s regulations. As a consequence, these Venetian subjects were able to take advantage of the situation in order to gain leverage in the negotiations for their privileges with the Venice. As Braudel reminds us, there is a “positive correlation between piracy and the economic health…they rise and fall together” (Braudel II, 887); and sure it was, not necessarily for Venice, who was reconfiguring its trading economy on a more regional level, but surely for other merchant cities in the Adriatic Sea, in particular Ancona and Ragusa (Dubrovnik), whose trading was flourishing with great advantage of the Pope. The Jews played a significant role in this economic growth. In fact, after they were expelled from Spain, they settled in different places, creating vast and strong networks that increased the trading in the Mediterranean. Both Ancona and Ragusa attracted several Ponentine Jews, and towards the end of the XVI century, they were already well-established and their business was flourishing (Arbel, 2013). In this troublesome context, the reins of the Serenissima were in the hands of the “giovani”, the youngsters, a section of the patriciate more open to the protestant countries (England and the Netherlands in particular, but also sympathizers of the Huguenots in France too, to the point that they considered seriously to welcome the Reformation in Venice too), and less keen to find agreements with the Papacy and with the Habsburgs of Spain and Austria; the Venetian interdict of 1606-1607 and later the War of Gradisca are probably the most sounding episodes that testify this political trend. The Doge Leonardo 2 Donà was one of the most prominent – and radical – members of the Giovani party. After just two days from his election, and less than a month before the Pope lifted the interdict against Venice, he appointed state theologian a monk of the Servite order, Paolo Sarpi. As such Sarpi elaborated several consulti, writings in which he offered theologico-juridical expert advices to the patricians of Venice, whose political knowledge was often acquired through practice rather than studied on a theoretical level. On February 11, 1612, the Senate assigned to Sarpi the duty to write a consulto on a particular inlet close to Ferrara called Sacca di Goro. This inlet, closed to the Venetian southern border in a territory under papal jurisdiction, represented a very delicate issue: building there a commercial port would have offered to the merchants trading with the Papacy an easy access to the fluvial routes, up till Milan through the Po River, and therefore threating the Venetian markets. The official appointment specified that “a detailed writing on the subject with our reasons [was necessary] to be used when needed, as it happened on the writings regarding Ceneda, which satisfied [the Senate] very much and brought great benefit to the public good” (Sarpi/Pin, 2001). In order to do that, the Senate authorized Sarpi the access to all the official documents, including those classified, relating not only the inlet, but also, and here I am just translating Sarpi, “several other documents concerning the Venetian rule over the Adriatic Sea” (Sarpi/Cozzi, 1969). On April 12 of the same year, Sarpi presented to the Senate the product, which became known as the Dominio del Mare Adriatico. As we have seen, it was a work intended for a limited audience, 3 the ruling class of Venice, and therefore it was conceived and written according to their needs. This work has been analyzed already by some of the most important historians of the Venetian Republic (Cessi, 1953; Cozzi, 1969), and more recently it has been reconsidered in a historical treatise on the law of the Adriatic Sea (Acquaviva/Scovazzi, 2007). While the former have emphasized the political nature of this work, the latter have underlined the juridical value of it. Here I would like to stress that, especially in the light of other official writings and private correspondence of Sarpi, the Dominio del Mare Adriatico strategically develops as well a modern discourse around sovereignty. I will just briefly sketch the structure of this work, and indulge a little more on the strategies that Sarpi adopted to organize a text that could satisfy both the purposes of the Senate and, at the same time, as in the example of his previous consulto on Ceneda, allowed him to elaborate original ideas in the broader – both theoretical and geographical – dialogue around sovereignty. Sarpi organized his work in five parts: in the first one he stressed the fact that the rights of the Republic on the sea were not an acquisition; rather, they were natural and derived from the birth of Venice itself. To make this point, he compared it with Rome and the fact that nobody ever questioned the seven hills to be the Roman natural territory. As a consequence, the Republic’s dominion on the sea was not and could not derive or be revoked either by popes or by emperors. In the following two points he then explained how Venice reaffirmed time and again its rights on the sea, and for which reasons those who argued 4 against it were wrong. The last part – often set aside by those who have studied this work of Sarpi – describes the controversy over the inlet of Goro that, as I have mentioned before, was in fact the starting point for this larger work on the Adriatic’s sovereignty. This last section has been often seen as detached by the rest of the writings even in earlier publications, for it revolved around a particular case, and it was not consistent with the wide-ranging argument of the other sections. Yet, as Cessi and Cozzi have shown, it is on the contrary crucial to understand both the political nature of the work, and the structural strategy adopted by Sarpi to support his theses. Again, the example of Ceneda turns out to be very useful to understand this point. Ceneda was a burgh in the surrounding of Treviso – hence in the territories of the Republic – whose sovereignty was contended between Venice and the local bishop, who claimed it as a feudal possession, and therefore subject to the Pope. In 1611, just one year before writing the Dominio del mare Adriatico, Sarpi presented to the Senate four writings in which he dismissed the pretensions of the Church and reaffirmed the rights of the Serenissima. Although the writing of Ceneda did not explicitly imply a more general analysis of broader territories, as in the Dominio del Mare Adriatico, it appears clear that he started from a defined controversy with the Church to develop a legal and political argument that could have been used as well to impugn similar pretensions in other occasions. In his writings on both the Adriatic Sea and Ceneda, Sarpi avoided to discuss the cases in purely juridical terms for several reasons. One, he was well aware 5 of the muddy waters of the Roman code, and the mastery of the jurisconsults of the Pope. Two, for the fact that Venice’s legal system did not adhere to the Justinian code; therefore, simply relying on its interpretation, implied an abatement of the Venetian legal system. On the contrary, drawing upon the customs allowed Sarpi, on the one hand, to glorify the history of the Republic through selected events; on the other, the customs supported with tangible exemplifications the abstract logical reasoning (Chabod, 1966). Three, because his writings were addressed to the Venetian patriciate, whose appreciation for direct and empirical explanations far exceed its interest in theoretical legal discussions, and whose understanding of Latin was generally quite poor (Povolo, 2006). Four, the Roman code was not the best fit for the needs of a “modern” state or, more precisely, it required inventive interpretations to adapt it to the interactions between sovereign states. Sarpi preferred to rely instead upon history, an inquiry of the past to explain the present times, not limited to an archival research of official documents, but open to chronicles, accounts, and any other source which could have served the purpose.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GREEK and LATIN CLASSICS V Blackwell’S Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ
    Blackwell’s Rare Books Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Blackwell’S rare books Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/rarebooks GREEK AND LATIN CLASSICS V Blackwell’s Rare Books 48-51 Broad Street, Oxford, OX1 3BQ Direct Telephone: +44 (0) 1865 333555 Switchboard: +44 (0) 1865 792792 Email: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0) 1865 794143 www.blackwell.co.uk/ rarebooks Our premises are in the main Blackwell bookstore at 48-51 Broad Street, one of the largest and best known in the world, housing over 200,000 new book titles, covering every subject, discipline and interest, as well as a large secondhand books department. There is lift access to each floor. The bookstore is in the centre of the city, opposite the Bodleian Library and Sheldonian Theatre, and close to several of the colleges and other university buildings, with on street parking close by. Oxford is at the centre of an excellent road and rail network, close to the London - Birmingham (M40) motorway and is served by a frequent train service from London (Paddington). Hours: Monday–Saturday 9am to 6pm. (Tuesday 9:30am to 6pm.) Purchases: We are always keen to purchase books, whether single works or in quantity, and will be pleased to make arrangements to view them. Auction commissions: We attend a number of auction sales and will be happy to execute commissions on your behalf. Blackwell online bookshop www.blackwell.co.uk Our extensive online catalogue of new books caters for every speciality, with the latest releases and editor’s recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting the White Elephant. When and How Did Galileo
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 97 (1998) Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Hunting the White Elephant When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? ISSN 0948-9444 1 HUNTING THE WHITE ELEPHANT WHEN AND HOW DID GALILEO DISCOVER THE LAW OF FALL? Jürgen Renn, Peter Damerow, Simone Rieger, and Michele Camerota Mark Twain tells the story of a white elephant, a present of the king of Siam to Queen Victoria of England, who got somehow lost in New York on its way to England. An impressive army of highly qualified detectives swarmed out over the whole country to search for the lost treasure. And after short time an abundance of optimistic reports with precise observations were returned from the detectives giving evidence that the elephant must have been shortly before at that very place each detective had chosen for his investigations. Although no elephant could ever have been strolling around at the same time at such different places of a vast area and in spite of the fact that the elephant, wounded by a bullet, was lying dead the whole time in the cellar of the police headquarters, the detectives were highly praised by the public for their professional and effective execution of the task. (The Stolen White Elephant, Boston 1882) THE ARGUMENT In spite of having been the subject of more than a century of historical research, the question of when and how Galileo made his major discoveries is still answered insufficiently only. It is mostly assumed that he must have found the law of fall around the year 1604 and that only sev- 1 This paper makes use of the work of research projects of the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, some pursued jointly with the Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale in Florence, the Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, and the Istituto Nazionale die Fisica Nucleare in Florence.
    [Show full text]
  • Petrus Ramus Y El Derecho
    Petrus Ramus y el Derecho Rafael Ramis Barceló Petrus Ramus y el Derecho The Figuerola Institute Programme: Legal History The Programme “Legal History” of the Figuerola Institute of Social Science History –a part of the Carlos III University of Madrid– is devoted to improve the overall knowledge on the history of law from different points of view –academically, culturally, socially, and institutionally– covering both ancient and modern eras. A number of experts from several countries have participated in the Programme, bringing in their specialized knowledge and dedication to the subject of their expertise. To give a better visibility of its activities, the Programme has published in its Book Series a number of monographs on the different aspects of its academic discipline. Publisher: Carlos III University of Madrid Book Series: Legal History Editorial Committee: Manuel Ángel Bermejo Castrillo, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Catherine Fillon, Université Jean Moulin Lyon 3 Manuel Martínez Neira, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Carlos Petit, Universidad de Huelva Cristina Vano, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II More information at www.uc3m.es/legal_history Petrus Ramus y el Derecho Los juristas ramistas del siglo XVI Rafael Ramis Barceló Historia del derecho, 40 © 2015 Rafael Ramis Barceló Editorial Dykinson c/ Meléndez Valdés, 61 – 28015 Madrid Tlf. (+34) 91 544 28 46 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.dykinson.com Preimpresión: TALLERONCE ISBN: 978-84-9085-683-3 ISSN: 2255-5137 D.L.: M-2486-2016 Versión electrónica disponible en e-Archivo http://hdl.handle.net/10016/22197 Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España Para Antonio Planas Rosselló ÍNDICE Introducción .
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 M
    Z Zabarella, Jacopo chair of logic, succeeding Tomitano. On 4 January 1569 he secured the second extraordinary chair of Born: 5 September 1533, Padua natural philosophy. There was likely a pause in his Died: 15 October 1589, Padua teaching from 1574 to 1576 on account of the severity of plague in Padua. On 26 March 1577 Marco Sgarbi he acquired the first extraordinary chair of natural Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy philosophy, and in 1578, he published his Opera logica in Venice, thus opening a large debate on the Abstract order and method of knowledge among his con- temporaries – especially with Francesco Jacopo Zabarella (1553–1589) is considered Piccolomini (1520–1604) and Bernardino Petrella one of the most acute and brilliant logicians (1529–1595). In 1580 Zabarella published his of all time. He made an important contribution Tabulae logicae and also founded the Accademia to the interpretation of Aristotle and developed degli Stabili. In 1584, he came under attack in two original ideas especially in the field of logic directions: from Piccolomini in his Universa and epistemology, opening up the pathway of philosophia de moribus, and from Petrella in his early modern science. Logicarum disputationum libri VII. The same year, Zabarella’s reply to Piccolomini was his De doctrina ordine apologia. In the meantime, on Biography 6 September 1585, he became professor of the second ordinary chair of natural philosophy, and He was born in Padua on 5 September 1533, the the following year he published his De naturalis eldest son of Giulio Zabarella. He was well-versed scientiae constitutione.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Hobbes: Fascist Exponent Of
    Thomas Hobbes Click hereforFullIssueofFidelioVolume5,Number1,Spring1996 k r k o r o Y Y w e w e N , N n , o n i t o i c t e c l l e l o l o C C r e r g e n g a n r a r G G e h e h T T Fascist Exponent of © 1996 Schiller Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction inwhole orinpart without permission strictly prohibited. Enlightenment Science by Brian Lantz n his May 10, 1982 speech to the British Foreign Ser- the horrors of Cambodia, Somalia, Rwanda, and Bosnia. vice assembled at the Royal Institute of International The literally fascist legislative agenda of Conservative IAffairs’ Chatham House, Henry Kissinger lauded Revolutionaries Newt Gingrich and Phil Gramm, under the “Hobbesian” premise of British foreign policy. That the sponsorship of various Mont Pelerin Society-connect- Kissinger was correct in identifying the axiomatics of ed thinktanks, underscores the significance of “Sir” British foreign policy as “Hobbesian,” should alert the Kissinger’s Hobbesian remark for domestic politics with- reader to the significance of the doctrines of Thomas in the United States itself. Hobbes (1588-1679), to the events unfolding now, three Like his homosexual lover Francis Bacon and fellow hundred and fifty years later, as Current History. British empiricist John Locke, Thomas Hobbes was Over the past century, for geopolitical purposes, the deployed by the then-Venice-centered oligarchy against British oligarchy has orchestrated a true Hobbesian “war __________ of each against all,” bringing about two world wars and Thomas Hobbes (center), Paolo Sarpi (left), Galileo Galilei (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Continental Books
    CONTINENTAL BOOKS Bernard Quaritch Ltd List 016 / ALBERTI IN SPANISH 1. ALBERTI, Leon Battista. El Momo. La moral e muy graciosa historia del Momo; compuesta en Latin por el docto varon Leon Baptista Alberto Florentin. Trasladada en Castellano por Agustín de Almaçan ... Alcalá de Henares, Joan Mey Flandro, 1553. Small folio, ff. [xiv], 71 + one leaf; gothic letter, title printed in red and black within a composite woodcut border of renaissance ornament, printer’s woodcut device in the centre, woodcut initials, headpieces; last leaf (blank except for printer’s device on recto) in deceptive facsimile, wormhole in lower blank margins of three gatherings carefully filled in, one leaf (I1) remargined on three sides with loss of a few letters, some light browning; otherwise a very sound and large copy with some uncut edges, in recent limp vellum wrappers. £3800 First edition in Spanish of Alberti’s Momus (or De principe) translated by Augustín de Almaçan and with an introductory Exposición by the Toledo ascetic writer and scholar Alejo Venegas (1495?–1554?). An indispensable source for Alberti’s political thought and a supremely interesting example of how the comic spirit of the early Renaissance expressed itself in literature, Alberti’s Momus is a political and social satire set in the form of an allegorical/mythological fable. Its mood is that of a light- hearted humanist jeu d’esprit; its humorous and even farcical manner was intended, as Alberti states in his preface, to make readers laugh while at the same time confronting them with serious political and social issues, in particular, with the question of what makes a good ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • 008-70 509.Pdf
    in the Preaching of the Word of Goel. 509 our :M:aster's messengers, of bearing it in our ministration in this needing world ! His last word to His Church assemblecl in her representa,tives was, "Ye shall be witnesses of Me." And time only intensifies the need and power of obedience to that royal order. How, in our preaching, under the blessing of the Holy Spirit, shall we best find out the soul, and win it for our beloved Lord, and build it up in Him 1 On the one hand, by an unwearied affirmation, thoughtful, loving, con­ fident, of the eternal facts; on the other, by snch a presenta­ tion of them as shall let all men see that they are facts to us. ---=~--- ART. II.-FR.A PAOLO SARPI. HE Rev. Alexander Robertson has rnceivecl a letter of T thanks from the King of Italy, through the governor of the Royal Houseb old, for his "Life of Paolo Sarpi," and he has also been honoured with the degree of Doctor bestowec1 upon him in Scotland for bis literary labours. These acts of grace and courtesy are a strong testimony to the value of the work before us,1 while the first witnesses also to the liberality of the Italian Court. It was high time that Sarpi's Life should be issued in a trustworthy form, drawn from original sources which have been too much overlooked. Sarpi had the honour of being regarded as a dangerous antagonist by that section of the Roman Church which, while it is specially represented by the Jesuits, is far from confined to the members of that society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat from the Sea. the Kingdom of Naples Between Piracy, Warfare and Statehood in a Tractatus by Giovan Francesco De Ponte
    THE THREAT FROM THE SEA. THE KINGDOM OF NAPLES BETWEEN PIRACY, WARFARE AND STATEHOOD IN A TRACTATUS BY GIOVAN FRANCESCO DE PONTE LA MINACCIA DAL MARE. IL REGNO DI NAPOLI TRA PIRATERIA, GUERRA E COSTRUZIONE DELLO ‘SPAZIO’ STATALE IN UN TRACTATUS DI GIOVAN FRANCESCO DE PONTE Francesco Serpico Università degli Studi del Molise [email protected] Abstract english: The paper focuses on the topic of the impact of piracy on the institu- tional framework in the Kingdom of Naples during the Modern Age (XVIth ̶ XVIIth centu- ries). Many historians agree that the continuous Ottoman̶-Barbaresque raids on the coast of Southern Italy played a key role in the conditions of fragility and weakness of the South and its progressive marginalization from the economic and productive networks of early modern Europe. Consequently, the paper first analyzes the reason for military weakness of the Kingdom of Naples, and then it examines the effect of defensive vulnerability on the political-constitutional field through a Juridical culture’s paradigmatic text: theTrac- tatus de potestate Proregis et Collaterali Consilii et regimine Regni by Giovan Francesco De Ponte. In hindsight, the evaluation of the strategies of the government during the Spanish viceroyalty shows how the strong alliance between the Spanish Monarchy and the lawyers-administrators (the noble of robes) was a formidable legitimizing machine for the monarchy, but it also leads to the nobility progressively moving away from its tra- ditional role of government and military defense. The final result of this compromise was to deprive the Kingdom of the only means that they had that could effectively counter attack the maritime dominance of the Ottoman-Barabresque pirates and feed a growing sense of insecurity which deeply scarred the fragile political balances of the southern Monarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Paolo Sarpi's Vow of Obedience
    Hispania Sacra, LXVIII 137, enero-junio 2016, 45-56, ISSN: 0018-215X, doi: 10.3989/hs.2016.004 PoSa Lo arPI’S VoW of oBeDIenCe: CaThoLIC PoLITICaL ThoughT In earLY SeVenTeenTh-CenTurY VenICe POR Jaska Kainulainen University of Helsinki [email protected] Abstract The aim of this paper is to study the idea of obedience in early-modern Catholic political thought. I focus on early seventeenth- century Venice and on one of its leading political thinkers, Paolo Sarpi. I argue that for Sarpi and the Venetian nobility obedience was a religious, Catholic concept, which they nonetheless applied to a secular system of governance; notwithstanding their refusal to obey the papal ban during the interdict of Venice in 1606-1607, Venetians regarded obedience as an act of piety and an indis- pensable element of civic life. Key words: Catholic political thought, obedience, Venice, Paolo Sarpi, papacy eL VoTo De oBeDIenCIa De PaoLo SarPI: PenSamIenTo PoLÍTICo en La Venecia DE LA CONTRARREFORMA Resumen El objetivo de este artículo es estudiar la idea de obediencia en el pensamiento político católico de la edad moderna, en par- ticular en Venecia en el siglo xvii y en Paolo Sarpi, uno de sus pensadores políticos más importantes. Este artículo argumenta que para Sarpi y la nobleza la obediencia era un concepto católico, que a pesar de ello, aplicaron a un sistema de gobierno secular. A pesar de su negativa a obedecer la prohibición papal durante el interdicto de Venecia en 1606-1607, los venecianos consideraban la obediencia como un acto de piedad y un elemento indispensable de la vida cívica.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850
    History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850 https://www.historyoflogic.com/logic-modern.htm History of Logic from Aristotle to Gödel by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] History of Renaissance and Modern Logic from 1400 to 1850 INTRODUCTION: LOGIC IN CONTINENTAL EUROPE "At the end of the fourteenth century there were roughly three categories of work available to those studying logic. The first category is that of commentaries on Aristotle's 'Organon'. The most comprehensive of these focussed either on the books of the Logica Vetus, which included Porphyry's Isagoge along with the Categories and De Interpretatione; or on the books of the Logica Nova, the remaining works of the 'Organon' which had become known to the West only during the twelfth century. In addition there were, of course, numerous commentaries on individual books of the 'Organon'. The second category is that of works on non-Aristotelian topics. These include the so-called Parva logicalia, or treatises on supposition, relative terms, ampliation, appellation, restriction and distribution. To these could be added tracts on exponibles and on syncategorematic terms. Peter of Spain is now the best-known author of parva logicalia, but such authors as Thomas Maulvelt and Marsilius of Inghen were almost as influential in the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Another group of works belonging to the second category consists of the so-called 'tracts of the moderns', namely treatises on consequences, obligations and insolubles. A third group includes treatises on sophisms, on the composite and divided senses, and on proofs of terms, especially the well-known Speculum puerorum by Richard Billingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Paolo Sarpi, the Papal Index and Censorship." Censorship Moments: Reading Texts in the History of Censorship and Freedom of Expression
    Barbierato, Federico. "Paolo Sarpi, the Papal Index and Censorship." Censorship Moments: Reading Texts in the History of Censorship and Freedom of Expression. Ed. Geoff Kemp. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. 63–70. Textual Moments in the History of Political Thought. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 2 Oct. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472593078.ch-009>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 2 October 2021, 16:05 UTC. Copyright © Geoff Kemp and contributors 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 8 Paolo Sarpi, the Papal Index and Censorship Federico Barbierato Besides (said Becatelli) there is no need of bookes, the world hath too many already, especially since printing was invented: and it is better to forbid a 1000 bookes without cause, then permit one that deserveth prohibition. ... Fryar Gregorie, Generall of the Heremite, said, he did not think it necessary to observe so many subtleties. For the prohibition of a Book, is as the prohibition of a meate, which is not a sentence against it, nor against him that hath prepared it, but a precept to him that is to use it, made by him who hath the charge of his health; therefore the credit of the Victualer is not in question, but the benefit of the sicke, who is forbid to eate of a meat that is hurtfull to him, though in it selfe, it may be good. So the Synod, as a Physitian, ought to forbid that which is hurtfull, or dangerous to the faithfull; wherein none will receive wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • THE TRIAL of GALILEO-REVISITED Dr
    THE TRIAL OF GALILEO-REVISITED Dr. George DeRise Professor Emeritus, Mathematics Thomas Nelson Community College FALL 2018 Mon 1:30 PM- 3:30 PM, 6 sessions 10/22/2018 - 12/3/2018 (Class skip date 11/19) Sadler Center, Commonwealth Auditorium Christopher Wren Association BOOKS: THE TRIAL OF GALILEO, 1612-1633: Thomas F. Mayer. (Required) THE CASE FOR GALILEO- A CLOSED QUESTION? Fantoli, Annibale. GALILEO; THE RISE AND FALL OF A TROUBLESOME GENIUS. Shea, William; Artigas, Mariano. BASIC ONLINE SOURCES: Just Google: “Galileo” and “Galileo Affair” (WIKI) “Galileo Project” and “Trial of Galileo-Famous Trials” YOUTUBE MOVIES: Just Google: “GALILEO'S BATTLE FOR THE HEAVENS – NOVA – YOUTUBE” “GREAT BOOKS, GALILEO’S DIALOGUE – YOUTUBE” HANDOUTS: GLOSSARY CAST OF CHARACTERS BLUE DOCUMENTS GALILEO GALILEI: b. 1564 in Pisa, Italy Astronomer, Physicist, Mathematician Professor of Mathematics, Universities of Pisa and Padua. In 1610 he observed the heavens with the newly invented telescope- mountains and craters of the moon, moons of Jupiter, many stars never seen before; later the phases of Venus; sunspots. These observations supported his belief that the Copernican (Heliocentric) system was correct, i.e. that the Sun was the center of the Universe; the planets including earth revolved around it. This was in direct contrast to the Ptolemaic-Aristotelian (Geocentric) System which was 1500 years old at the time. Galileo’s Copernican view was also in conflict with the Christian interpretation of Holy Scripture. Because of the Counter Reformation Catholic theologians took a literal interpretation of the Bible. Galileo was investigated by the Inquisition in 1615 and warned not to defend the Copernican view.
    [Show full text]