DOCSLIB.ORG

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Saline Soils: Vertical Distribution at Different Soil Depth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Saline Soils: Vertical Distribution at Different Soil Depth CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CONICET Digital Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 45, 2, 585-594 (2014) Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia ISSN 1678-4405 www.sbmicrobiologia.org.br Research Paper Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils: Vertical distribution at different soil depth Alejandra Becerra1, Norberto Bartoloni2, Noelia Cofré1, Florencia Soteras1, Marta Cabello3 1Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, República Argentina. 2Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, República Argentina. 3Instituto Spegazzini, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, La Plata, República Argentina. Submitted: March 7, 2013; Approved: March 14, 2014. Abstract Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonize land plants in every ecosystem, even extreme condi- tions such as saline soils. In the present work we report for the first time the mycorrhizal status and the vertical fungal distribution of AMF spores present in the rhizospheric soil samples of four species of Chenopodiaceae (Allenrolfea patagonica, Atriplex argentina, Heterostachys ritteriana and Suaeda divaricata) at five different depths in two saline of central Argentina. Roots showed medium, low or no colonization (0-50%). Nineteen morphologically distinctive AMF species were recovered. The number of AMF spores ranged between 3 and 1162 per 100 g dry soil, and AMF spore number de- creased as depth increased at both sites. The highest spore number was recorded in the upper soil depth (0-10 cm) and in S. divaricata. Depending of the host plant, some AMF species sporulated mainly in the deep soil layers (Glomus magnicaule in Allenrolfea patagonica, Septoglomus aff. constrictum in Atriplex argentina), others mainly in the top layers (G. brohultti in Atriplex argentina and Septoglomus aff. constrictum in Allenrolfea patagonica). Although the low percentages of colo- nization or lack of it, our results show a moderate diversity of AMF associated to the species of Chenopodiaceae investigated in this study. The taxonomical diversity reveals that AMF are adapted to extreme environmental conditions from saline soils of central Argentina. Key words: arbuscular mycorrhiza, saline environments, soil profile, vertical distribution, mycor- rhizal status. Introduction the characteristics of marginal lands for agriculture and In central Argentina 9% of the area is occupied by livestock and no stable human population within it, have fa- halophytic vegetation (Cabido and Zak, 1999). This type of cilitated the preservation of this pristine ecosystem. Within vegetation grows in habitats that are rare worldwide, since these saline habitats, the distribution patterns of plant com- only approximately 7% of the global land surface is cov- munities are defined by the salt gradient, with plant cover ered with saline habitats (Ruíz-Lozano and Azcón, 2000). inversely proportional to the presence of salt. At sites where Central Argentina presents some conspicuous salt flats: the Salinas Grandes and the Salinas de Ambargasta, which to- plant life is still possible, the most characteristic plant com- gether occupies an area of approximately 600,000 hectares. munity is the halophytic shrub or jumeal, composed of spe- The environmental isolation, the harsh climatic conditions, cies of the Chenopodiaceae family (Cabido and Zak, 1999). Send correspondence to A. Becerra. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, C.C. 495. 5000 Córdoba, República Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]. 586 Becerra et al. According to Juniper and Abbott (1993), high salinity the understory vegetation is represented by Larrea in soils has adverse effects on plant colonization by arbus- divaricata Cav. and some halophytes. cular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). However, there are reports Our studied area, the edge of the salt flat, shows in the literature from all over the world that plants of salt heavy constraints to the developing of any type of plant marshes can be colonized by AMF (Hildebrandt et al., cover, being extremely open and scarce with the only pres- 2001; Juniper and Abbott, 1993; Landwehr et al., 2002; ence of four species adapted to harsh environment: Smith and Read, 2008; Wang et al., 2004). Even in families Allenrolfea patagonica (Moq.) Kuntze, Atriplex argentina that are generally considered non-mycorrhizal, such as Speg., Heterostachys ritteriana (Moq.) Moq. and Suaeda Chenopodiaceae (Gerdemann, 1968; Hirrel et al., 1978; divaricata Moq. (Cabido and Zak, 1999; Cabido et al., Mohankumar and Mahadevan, 1987; Peterson et al., 1985), 2006). Sampling was made in an area of approximately 50 x the most salt-tolerant Salicornia sp. and Suaeda maritima 50 m in the two sites in end of the growing season (March, can be colonized (Kim and Weber, 1985; Rozema et al., Summer) because during this period the plants present their 1986; Sengupta and Chaudhuri, 1990). full splendor (with flowers). Soil samples were randomly Ecological studies on the community structure of and carefully taken with a metal corer (3 cm of diameter) AMF are generally restricted to the top 20 cm of soil, where from under the canopy of five plants of each species to con- most of the root biomass is concentrated (Brundrett, 1991). firm connection between roots and shoots. The five soil Only a few studies included the subsoil. Mycorrhizal colo- samples per species were considered replicates. nization (Jakobsen and Nielsen, 1983; Rillig and Field, Samples were collected from 0 to more than 40 cm in 2003), infective propagules (Ann et al., 1990), extra-radical depth, at 10-cm intervals (at 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, and mycelium (Kabir et al., 1998) and AMF spores (Oehl et al., 40-50 cm depths) in each site. Samples from each layer 2005) decrease with increasing soil depth. Few studies have (620 cm3 soil volume) of each replicate were placed in indi- documented what happens with AMF diversity along soil vidual plastic bags and stored at 4 °C. profile. Cooke et al. (1993), Oehl et al. (2005), Cuenca and To characterize the soil from each site, four soil sam- Lovera (2010) and Wang et al. (2004) have published the ples per depth level were taken and the following parame- species diversity and distribution across the soil profile in ters were measured: electrical conductivity (mmhos/cm), salt marsh grasses in the United States, in cultivated soils of extractable P determined with the method of Bray and Central Europe, tropical soils of Venezuela and in the Yel- Kurtz I (Jackson, 1964), pH in water (1:2.5), organic matter low River Delta of China, respectively. Until now, nothing content (Nelson and Sommers, 1982), carbon: nitrogen ra- has been reported about vertical distribution of AMF com- tio and soil texture. Total nitrogen was determined using munities in natural saline soils of Central Argentina. the micro-Kjeldhal method (Bremner and Mulvaney, In the present work we report for the first time the 1982). mycorrhizal status and the vertical fungal spores in four species of Chenopodiaceae (Allenrolfea patagonica (Moq.) AMF colonization and spores Kuntze, Atriplex argentina Speg., Heterostachys ritteriana Fresh roots were rinsed with water, cleared with 10% (Moq.) Moq. and Suaeda divaricata Moq.) in two saline KOH (15 min at 90 °C) and bleached with 30% H2O2 soil of central Argentina. Species of Chenopodiaceae are (10 min, room temperature), acidified with 1% HCl (1 min, the only plants able to growth in such extremophilus condi- room temperature) and stained for 5 min in 0.05% trypan tions and in Argentina ecosystems have not been previ- blue (Phillips and Hayman, 1970). To confirm mycorrhizal ously examined for AMF presence. structure, in a second stage we then mounted the roots on glass slides for examination under a Kyowa 4-100x micro- Materials and Methods scopic. The presence of arbuscules, vesicles, hyphal coils and intra- and intercellular hyphae without septa were used Study area and sample collection to designate AM associations. Quantification of AM root The study was conducted in two saline “Salinas de colonization was estimated visually as the proportion of the Ambargasta” -SA- (64º18’ W, 29º27’ S) and “Salinas root which was colonized and characterized using five Grandes” -SG- (64º31’ W, 29º44’ S), in the north of Cór- classes: very high (> 80%), high (60-79%), medium (40- doba Province, central Argentina. The climate in both sites 59%), low (20-39%), and very low (1-19%), following is dry and warm, with a mean annual precipitation below Zangaro et al. (2002). 500 mm and mean temperature of 19.9 °C. The highest ar- AMF spores were extracted from 100 g (dry weight) eas (170 masl, with low salt concentration) are occupied by of each soil sample by wet sieving and decanting (Ger- a xerophytic forest of Aspidosperma quebracho-blanco demann and Nicolson, 1963), and the supernatant was cen- Schltdl., Prosopis flexuosa DC., Cercidium australe trifuged in a sucrose gradient (Walker et al., 1982). The Johnst., Mimozyganthus carinatus (Grisseb.) Bukart, procedure included passage through 500-, 125-, and 38-mm Ziziphus mistol Griseb., Prosopis torquata (Cav. ex Lag.) sieves. The 500-mm sieve was checked for large spores, DC., and Stetsonia coryne (Salm-Dyck) Britton & Rose; spore clusters, and sporocarps. The contents of the 125- and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils 587 38-mm sieves were layered onto a water-sucrose solution intraradical aseptate hyphae, intracellular hyphal coils and (70% [wt/vol]) gradient and centrifuged at 900 x g for intracellular vesicles in both sites at all soil depths. 2 min. Only apparently healthy spores (those that contained Arbuscules were not detected. AM colonization in plant cytoplasm, with no collapsed surface and no evidence of species was very low to low (5-31% and 2-37%) in A. parasitism) were counted under stereomicroscope directly. patagonica and S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Guide for Fourwing Saltbush (Atriplex Canescens)
    Plant Guide saline-sodic soils (Ogle and St. John, 2008). It has FOURWING SALTBUSH excellent drought tolerance and has been planted in highway medians and on road shoulders, slopes, and other Atriplex canescens (Pursh) Nutt. disturbed areas near roadways. Because it is a good Plant Symbol = ATCA2 wildlife browse species, caution is recommended in using fourwing saltbush in plantings along roadways. Its Contributed by: USDA NRCS Idaho Plant Materials extensive root system provides excellent erosion control. Program Reclamation: fourwing saltbush is used extensively for reclamation of disturbed sites (mine lands, drill pads, exploration holes, etc,). It provides excellent species diversity for mine land reclamation projects. Status Please consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g., threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Description Fourwing saltbush is a polymorphic species varying from deciduous to evergreen, depending on climate. Its much- branched stems are stout with whitish bark. Mature plants range from 0.3 to 2.4 m (1 to 8 ft) in height, depending on ecotype and the soil and climate. Its leaves are simple, alternate, entire, linear-spatulate to narrowly oblong, Fourwing saltbush. Photo by Steven Perkins @ USDA-NRCS canescent (covered with fine whitish hairs) and ½ to 2 PLANTS Database inches long. Its root system is branched and commonly very deep reaching depths of up to 6 m (20 ft) when soil Alternate Names depth allows (Kearney et al., 1960). Common Alternate Names: Fourwing saltbush is mostly dioecious, with male and Chamise, chamize, chamiso, white greasewood, saltsage, female flowers on separate plants (Welsh et al., 2003); fourwing shadscale, bushy atriplex however, some monoecious plants may be found within a population.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Treatment of the Genus Campylopus (Musci: Dicranaceae) in Central America Bruce H
    63 Tropical Bryology 1: 63-94, 1989 A preliminary treatment of the genus Campylopus (Musci: Dicranaceae) in Central America Bruce H. Allen Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Abstract. There are 26 species of Campylopus in Central America. They are divided into three groups on the basis of two characters: the presence or absence in the costa of a ventral layer of enlarged, hyaline cells and the presence or absence in the stem of an outer hylodermis. Dicranum costaricensis Bartr. is transferred to Campylopus as C. valerioi nom. nov. Campylopus hoffmanii and C. standleyi are recognized as distinct species. Six new synonyms are proposed: C. straminifolius = C. densicoma; C. costaricensis = C. surinamensis; C. roellii = C. tallulensis; C. donnellii = C. zygodonticarpus; C. tuerckheimii = C. zygodonticarpus; C. sargii = C. zygodonticarpus. The genus Campylopus is a large and taxono- are occupied by groups of species whose characters mically complex group of world-wide distribu- exhibit shades of variation in reticulate tion. Frahm (1988) considers the genus to have combinations. As presently understood, the only originated in the subantarctic region of the world; features common to all species of the genus are: in terms of species numbers the group is most 1. dioicous sexual condition, 2. broad, single, diversified in Central and South America. excurrent costae, 3. estomatate capsules and 4. There is a remarkable amount of variation setae sinuose when moist. found in nearly all characters of Campylopus, and A consideration of the genera near Campylo- as a result the generic limits of the genus are pus makes it apparent that the above character diffuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • WOOD ANATOMY of CHENOPODIACEAE (AMARANTHACEAE S
    IAWA Journal, Vol. 33 (2), 2012: 205–232 WOOD ANATOMY OF CHENOPODIACEAE (AMARANTHACEAE s. l.) Heike Heklau1, Peter Gasson2, Fritz Schweingruber3 and Pieter Baas4 SUMMARY The wood anatomy of the Chenopodiaceae is distinctive and fairly uni- form. The secondary xylem is characterised by relatively narrow vessels (<100 µm) with mostly minute pits (<4 µm), and extremely narrow ves- sels (<10 µm intergrading with vascular tracheids in addition to “normal” vessels), short vessel elements (<270 µm), successive cambia, included phloem, thick-walled or very thick-walled fibres, which are short (<470 µm), and abundant calcium oxalate crystals. Rays are mainly observed in the tribes Atripliceae, Beteae, Camphorosmeae, Chenopodieae, Hab- litzieae and Salsoleae, while many Chenopodiaceae are rayless. The Chenopodiaceae differ from the more tropical and subtropical Amaran- thaceae s.str. especially in their shorter libriform fibres and narrower vessels. Contrary to the accepted view that the subfamily Polycnemoideae lacks anomalous thickening, we found irregular successive cambia and included phloem. They are limited to long-lived roots and stem borne roots of perennials (Nitrophila mohavensis) and to a hemicryptophyte (Polycnemum fontanesii). The Chenopodiaceae often grow in extreme habitats, and this is reflected by their wood anatomy. Among the annual species, halophytes have narrower vessels than xeric species of steppes and prairies, and than species of nitrophile ruderal sites. Key words: Chenopodiaceae, Amaranthaceae s.l., included phloem, suc- cessive cambia, anomalous secondary thickening, vessel diameter, vessel element length, ecological adaptations, xerophytes, halophytes. INTRODUCTION The Chenopodiaceae in the order Caryophyllales include annual or perennial herbs, sub- shrubs, shrubs, small trees (Haloxylon ammodendron, Suaeda monoica) and climbers (Hablitzia, Holmbergia).
    [Show full text]
  • Allenrolfea Occidentalis and Sarcobatus Vermiculatus
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 57 Number 1 Article 7 3-7-1997 Ecophysiology of the temperate desert halophytes: Allenrolfea occidentalis and Sarcobatus vermiculatus James D. Trent U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation Biology Rangelands Unit, Reno, Nevada Robert R. Blank U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation Biology Rangelands Unit, Reno, Nevada James A. Young U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation Biology Rangelands Unit, Reno, Nevada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Trent, James D.; Blank, Robert R.; and Young, James A. (1997) "Ecophysiology of the temperate desert halophytes: Allenrolfea occidentalis and Sarcobatus vermiculatus," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 57 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol57/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 57(1), © 1997, pp. 57--65 ECOPHYSIOLOGY OF THE TEMPERATE DESERT HALOPHYTES: ALLENROLFEA OCCLDENTALIS AND SARCOBATUS VERMICULATUS James D. morl , Robert R. Blank 1,2, and James A. Young l ABSTRACI:-NuOierous basins of the intermountain area often have extensive playa surfaccs that arc nearly (lt~void of vegetation. Margins of these playas support sparse communities dominated by the chcnopod shrubs Allem'Vlfea ncciden­ talis (iodine bush) and Sarcobr;.tu.s veoniculatus (black gt'e.asewuud). These plants estahlish and persist in an environment where halomorphic soils induce extreme osmotic stress and atmospheric precipitation is very low and erratic and occurs largely during the winter when temperatures are too low for growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted March 13, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 1 Disentangling Sources of Gene Tree Discordance in Phylogenomic Datasets: Testing 2 Ancient Hybridizations in Amaranthaceae s.l. 3 4 Diego F. Morales-Briones1*, Gudrun Kadereit2, Delphine T. Tefarikis2, Michael J. Moore3, 5 Stephen A. Smith4, Samuel F. Brockington5, Alfonso Timoneda5, Won C. Yim6, John C. 6 Cushman6, Ya Yang1* 7 8 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 1445 9 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA 10 2 Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099, Mainz, 11 Germany 12 3 Department of Biology, Oberlin College, Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street, Oberlin, 13 OH 44074-1097, USA 14 4 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 North University 15 Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA 16 5 Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 17 3EA, United Kingdom 18 6 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89577, 19 USA 20 21 * Correspondence to be sent to: Diego F. Morales-Briones and Ya Yang. Department of Plant and 22 Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA, 23 Telephone: +1 612-625-6292 (YY) Email: [email protected]; [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/794370; this version posted March 13, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report
    Annotated Checklist of the Vascular Plant Flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Phase II Report By Dr. Terri Hildebrand Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT and Dr. Walter Fertig Moenave Botanical Consulting, Kanab, UT Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit Agreement # H1200-09-0005 1 May 2012 Prepared for Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument Southern Utah University National Park Service Mojave Network TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Introduction . 4 Study Area . 6 History and Setting . 6 Geology and Associated Ecoregions . 6 Soils and Climate . 7 Vegetation . 10 Previous Botanical Studies . 11 Methods . 17 Results . 21 Discussion . 28 Conclusions . 32 Acknowledgments . 33 Literature Cited . 34 Figures Figure 1. Location of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 5 Figure 2. Ecoregions and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 8 Figure 3. Soil types and 2010-2011 collection sites in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 9 Figure 4. Increase in the number of plant taxa confirmed as present in Grand Canyon- Parashant National Monument by decade, 1900-2011 . 13 Figure 5. Southern Utah University students enrolled in the 2010 Plant Anatomy and Diversity course that collected during the 30 August 2010 experiential learning event . 18 Figure 6. 2010-2011 collection sites and transportation routes in Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument in northern Arizona . 22 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # Tables Table 1. Chronology of plant-collecting efforts at Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument . 14 Table 2. Data fields in the annotated checklist of the flora of Grand Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Appendices A, B, C, and D) .
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Flora
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 2 Effects of Fire on Flora December 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 257 p. This state-of-knowledge review about the effects of fire on flora and fuels can assist land managers with ecosystem and fire management planning and in their efforts to inform others about the ecological role of fire. Chapter topics include fire regime classification, autecological effects of fire, fire regime characteristics and postfire plant community developments in ecosystems throughout the United States and Canada, global climate change, ecological principles of fire regimes, and practical considerations for managing fire in an ecosytem context. Keywords: ecosystem, fire effects, fire management, fire regime, fire severity, fuels, habitat, plant response, plants, succession, vegetation The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published from 2000 through 2001. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below. Or send your order and your address in mailing label form to one of the other listed media. Your order(s) will be filled as the volumes are published. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Morphological Evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae Alliance Donald B
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2003 Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance Donald B. Pratt Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Pratt, Donald B., "Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Chenopodiaceae-Amaranthaceae alliance " (2003). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 613. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/613 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Plants of Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Common Name Version
    Wild Plants of Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Common Name Version A Photographic Guide Sorted by Form, Color and Family with Habitat Descriptions and Identification Notes Photographs and text by Wilde Legard District Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District New Revised and Expanded Edition - Includes the latest scientific names, habitat descriptions and identification notes Decimal Inches .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 .5 2 .5 3 .5 4 .5 5 .5 6 .5 7 .5 8 .5 9 1/8 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/2 2 1/2 3 1/2 4 1/2 5 1/2 6 1/2 7 1/2 8 1/2 9 English Inches Notes: A Photographic Guide to the Wild Plants of Brushy Peak Regional Preserve More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format so that it can easily be updated as additional photographs become available. You have permission to freely download, distribute and print this guide for individual use. Photographs are © 2014 Wilde Legard, all rights reserved. In this guide, the included plants are sorted first by form (Ferns & Fern-like, Grasses & Grass-like, Herbaceous, Woody), then by most common flower color, and finally by similar looking flowers (grouped by genus within each family). Each photograph has the following information, separated by '-': COMMON NAME According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and other references (not standardized).
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Plants of Utah
    DESERT PLANTS OF UTAH Original booklet and drawings by Berniece A. Andersen Revised May 1996 HG 505 FOREWORD The original Desert Plants of Utah by Berniece A. Andersen has been a remarkably popular book, serving as a tribute to both her botanical knowledge of the region and to her enthusiastic manner. For these reasons, we have tried to retain as much of the original work, in both content and style, as possible. Some modifications were necessary. We have updated scientific names in accordance with changes that have occurred since the time of the first publication and we have also incorporated new geographic distributional data that have accrued with additional years of botanical exploration. The most obvious difference pertains to the organization of species. In the original version, species were organized phylogenetically, reflecting the predominant concepts of evolutionary relationships among plant families at that time. In an effort to make this version more user-friendly for the beginner, we have chosen to arrange the plants primarily by flower color. We hope that these changes will not diminish the enjoyment gained by anyone familiar with the original. We would also like to thank Larry A. Rupp, Extension Horticulture Specialist, for critical review of the draft and for the cover photo. Linda Allen, Assistant Curator, Intermountain Herbarium Donna H. Falkenborg, Extension Editor TABLE OF CONTENTS The Nature of Deserts ........................................................1 Utah’s Deserts ........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Plants As Indicators of Ground Water
    Please do not destroy or throv away this publication. JTyou have no further use for it write to the Geological Survey at Washington andiaskf^r a frank to return it DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. 8. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 577 PLANTS AS INDICATORS OF GROUND WATEB BY OSCAR EDWARD MEINZER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1927 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Georgte Otis Smith, Director Water-Supply Paper 577 PLANTS AS INDICATORS OF GROUND WATER BY OSCAR E}DWARD MEINZER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1927 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCUBEDTFEOM THE SUPEEINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS U.S.GOVEENMENT PEINTING\>FFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AX 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS Introduction ______________________ - 1 Plants that habitually feed on ground water 1 Evidences of the ground-water habit 2 History of the subject 8 Questions that deserve further study 14 Acknowledgments __ _ IS Principal species of plants that habitually feed on ground water 15 Arrangement of species _ _ 15 Bushes; sedges, and cat-tails. _______ 16 Reeds and cane__ _ _ _ _____ _ ___ 17 Wild rye ______________ _ ___ _ _ ____________ 17 Salt grass _______________ _ ________ _______ 19 Sacaton ________________ ___ ___ 23 Pickleweed, samphire, seepweed, and other succulent salt-resistant plants ________ ________ _ _ __ _ _ 25 Yerba mansa __ _ _____ ___ __ ____ _ _ __ _ 29 Rabbit brush and related species __________ _ _ 29 Arrow weed,
    [Show full text]