Kalibangan : Death from Natural Causes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kalibangan : Death from Natural Causes ANTIQUITY, XLII, 1968 Kalibangan : Death from Natural Causes by ROBERT RAIKES Mr R. L. Raikes is a hydrologist who is head of the firm of Raikes and Partners, consulting engineers in Rome. We recently published an article by him on ‘The Mohenjo-daro Floods’ (ANTIQUITY, 1965, 196), in which he concluded that Mohmjo-daro and ‘inevitably all other sites in the same general area of the Indus jlood-plain, were gradually engulfed by mud’. This article provoked discussion and comment in subsequent numbers. Mr Raikes now considers the end of Kalibangan some time in the 18thcentury BC and excludes the hypothesis of catastrophic climate change. As he has recently been accused of being a prophet of the New Catastrophism, he says that here it is rather a relief to him to be able, with conviction, to exclude catastrophic climate change. ALIBANGAN, which has been ex- Sind and the central Punjab-Mohenjo-daro, K cavated during recent years-and is still Harappa, Chanhu-daro, Judeir-jo daro, being excavated at the time of writing-by the Lohumjo-daro, to name but a few-may be of Archaeological Survey of India, is one of the significance. For, whereas the other ‘cities’ more important sites of the Harappan Civiliza- named were constructed largely of burnt brick, tion in India (FIG. I). Interim reports on it have Kalibangan was mainly of mud-brick construc- been published in Indian Archaeology. The tion. Some use of burnt brick there certainly subject of this short paper will in due course be was but the comparative rarity of it suggests the published in full, with the necessary technical possibility that the means of producing large details, in Ancient India. quantities of burnt brick did not match the Kalibangan has many things in common with knowledge of how to do so. In other words it sites such as Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, suggests a possible lack of abundant fuel. including virtually the whole repertoire of In 1968 I had the opportunity of carrying out pottery, flint industry, carved seals, figurines a brief environmental survey of the site and its and the like as well as an apparent division into surroundings through the generosity of the two well-defined areas: a western smaller area, British Academy and the University Museum of tentatively identified as the citadel area; and a the University of Pennsylvania. This generous larger eastern area thought to be the residential support as well as the extreme courtesy and co- and business quarter. Its size approaches that operation of the Archaeological Survey of of Judeir-jo daro (which is also divided into two India are most gratefully acknowledged. areas but in a quite different way)-a Harappan The basic problem was that of the reason for site that I discovered on the Kacchi plain in Sind the abandonment of Kalibangan some time in not far from Jacobabad. Judeir-jo daro is the 18th century BC. Various possibilities generally regarded as an important site and it existed; many of them still exist. Only the seems improbable that Kalibangan was of hypothesis of sudden and dramatic-indeed significantly less importance. catastrophic-climate change must, I think, be For this reason the principal difference excluded. The other principal hypotheses are: between Kalibangan and the main sites in a sudden diversion of what was once the River 286 KALIBANGAN: DEATH FROM NATURAL CAUSES Fig. I. Map showing site of Kalibangan (India) Ghaggar into the Ganges system; collapse of the clay and coarse sand that describe the materials whole Harappan Empire consequent on the found by us. Let it suffice to say that these collapse of Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, for one terms have special significance in the professions or other or all of the various explanations put in which they are common currency. The special forward; the loss by diversion to its present significance attaches to the means by which such course of a prehistoric Sutlej; there are probably materials are deposited. others. The first of these hypotheses appears to We found, at a depth of about LI m. below be right. the present flood-plain level, a coarse, greyish Through the cooperation of the Archaeo- sand very similar in mineral content to that logical Survey of India and their willingness to found in the bed of the present-day Yamuna consult also the Geological Survey of India I (Jumna). It extended over a width at least four had the advice of both those archaeologists- times that of the bed of the present-day Mr B. B. Lal, then Joint Deputy Director Yamuna and down to a depth, at one point at General, and Mr B. K. Thapar-most familiar least, of 30 m. Within the II m. of deposits with the site, and of Mr R. K. Karanth, overlying this sand we found mainly a material Geologist in charge of the whole of Rajasthan which emerged as a clayey silt but which and Gujerat. probably, in the undisturbed state which we This is not the place for a full description of could not examine with the equipment available, the limited drilling programme carried out consists of intercalated silty clay and silt; the under the general supervision of Mr Karanth existence of some silty clay was borne out by a and myself, or of its results (FIG. 2). I do not few tenacious pieces of this material which propose to give definitions of terms such as silty reached the surface. This material in short is Fig. 2. Plan showing bare-hales typical flood-plain deposit of the kind being manner in which its meandering channel has laid down today at a rate of about zm. per migrated across the 10 to 15 km. width of the thousand years.* We also found, at varying plain. The present Western Yamuna Main depths in the four boreholes, shallow beds of a Canal evidently incorporates considerable parts fine silty sand still containing the grey granite- of a former channel that followed the extreme derived material that occurs in the Yamuna, western boundary of the plain. Near Indri this consistent with the various meander channels of western boundary is barely definable in terms of an aggrading river (FIG. 3). levels, for the plain to the west of the Main Unfortunately air photos were not available Canal slopes gently but continuously towards so recourse was had to available and very the Indus system: to the east it slopes gently detailed large-scale maps of the area. Study of towards the present Yamuna which occupies a the contours where these are shown and of spot- former back-swamp area. The Yamuna today is levels where they are not shown was very part of the Ganga (Ganges) system. revealing. The map study extended far north The area to the west of the Main Canal into the Siwaliks, north-west to the Sutlej and indicates numerous small lakes of which many east and north-east to the Yamuna and included have the typical form of abandoned ox-bow the latter down to somewhat south of Indri. bends. This area was known in earliest historic The present Yamuna flood-plain shows on the times by the Sanskrit name of Sarasvati: map almost as clearly as on air photos the Mr B. B. La1 informs me that this can be translated as a 'river' reduced to the condition of * Sir Claude Inglis, The Behaviour and Control of Rivers and Canals, Government of India Research a chain of pools. Publication no. 13 (Poona, 1049). Excavations carried out at an Early Historic 288 KALIBANGAN: DEATH FROM NATURAL CAUSES Level of LoessTerrace andofHamppanand BH4 BH3 BH2 I pre-Hamppan fdns. Arbitrary datum ~. t - -.-.- GHAGGAR------ FLOOD PLAIN Possible Flood Plain Hurappan times FINE SAND ED. SANDM noriton pporl dehned Fig. 3. Schematic cross-section through bed of former Ghaggar River looking upstream Site near Kalibangan, but situated in the flood- No records were available to us at the time to plain whereas Kalibangan is above and beside indicate what conditions were like before the flood-plain, showed that the lowest level is irrigation of the Ghaggar was started in modern about 3 m. below the present flood-plain level. times. The absence of any defined channel in the This lowest level would correspond with a date Ghaggar flood-plain points to a very long period of about IOO BC. The Early Historic Sites along of very attenuated seasonal floods with slow the Ghaggar remained in general to about build-up of sediments. An estimate of the rate AD 500 when they were abandoned. of such build-up has been made from archaeo- Between these most recent occupations and logical evidence which shows that it is slower the Pre-Harappan/Harappan sequence, dated than that of a perennially overflowing river to about BC, there were other (that is about 2 m. per years). 2500-1750 1,000 occupants of the Ghaggar Valley. The people The general hypothesis, which emerges from responsible for Painted Grey Ware occupied the calculations that form part of the full article sites along the Ghaggar and also northwards and from the archaeological evidence that fits along the relatively small and intermittently so neatly into the picture, is of alternating flowing stream (the true Ghaggar which has lent capture of the Yamuna by the Indus and Ganges its name to the wide and now waterless flood systems respectively. That low and almost plain that stretches to the Indus) that drains a indiscernible watershed between the. two relatively small area of the Siwalik Hills to the systems and the slow migration westward of the west of the Yamuna.
Recommended publications
  • 3-Art-Of-Indus-Valley.Pdf
    Harappan civilization 2 Architecture 2 Drainage System 3 The planning of the residential houses were also meticulous. 4 Town Planning 4 Urban Culture 4 Occupation 5 Export import product of 5 Clothing 5 Important centres 6 Religious beliefs 6 Script 7 Authority and governance 7 Technology 8 Architecture Of Indus Valley Civilisation 9 The GAP 9 ARTS OF THE INDUS VALLEY 11 Stone Statues 12 MALE TORSO 12 Bust of a bearded priest 13 Male Dancer 14 Bronze Casting 14 DANCING GIRL 15 BULL 16 Terracotta 16 MOTHER GODDESS 17 Seals 18 Pashupati Seal 19 Copper tablets 19 Bull Seal 20 Pottery 21 PAINTED EARTHEN JAR 22 Beads and Ornaments 22 Toy Animal with moveable head 24 Page !1 of !26 Harappan civilization India has a continuous history covering a very long period. Evidence of neolithic habitation dating as far back as 7000 BC has been found in Mehrgarh in Baluchistan. However, the first notable civilization flourished in India around 2700 BC in the north western part of the Indian subcontinent, covering a large area. The civilization is referred to as the Harappan civilization. Most of the sites of this civilization developed on the banks of Indus, Ghaggar and its tributaries. Architecture The excavations at Harappa and Mohenjodaro and several other sites of the Indus Valley Civilisation revealed the existence of a very modern urban civilisation with expert town planning and engineering skills. The very advanced drainage system along with well planned roads and houses show that a sophisticated and highly evolved culture existed in India before the coming of the Aryans.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts of the Indus Valley
    2 ARTS OF THE INDUS VALLEY HE arts of the Indus Valley Civilisation emerged during Tthe second half of the third millennium BCE. The forms of art found from various sites of the civilisation include sculptures, seals, pottery, jewellery, terracotta figures, etc. The artists of that time surely had fine artistic sensibilities and a vivid imagination. Their delineation of human and animal figures was highly realistic in nature, since the anatomical details included in them were unique, and, in the case of terracotta art, the modelling of animal figures was done in an extremely careful manner. The two major sites of the Indus Valley Civilisation, along the Indus river—the cities of Harappa in the north and Mohenjodaro in the south—showcase one of earliest examples of civic planning. Other markers were houses, markets, storage facilities, offices, public baths, etc., arranged in a grid-like pattern. There was also a highly developed drainage system. While Harappa and Mohenjodaro are situated in Pakistan, the important sites excavated in India are Lothal and Dholavira in Gujarat, Rakhigarhi in Haryana, Bust of a bearded priest Ropar in Punjab, Kalibangan in Rajasthan, etc. Stone Statues Statues whether in stone, bronze or terracotta found in Harappan sites are not abundant, but refined. The stone statuaries found at Harappa and Mohenjodaro are excellent examples of handling three-dimensional volumes. In stone are two male figures—one is a torso in red sandstone and the other is a bust of a bearded man in soapstone—which are extensively discussed. The figure of the bearded man, interpreted as a priest, is draped in a shawl coming under the right arm and covering the left shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    BOOK REVIEWS Indian Beads: A Cultural aud Technological Study. Shantaram Bha1chandra Deo. Pune: Deccan College Postgraduate and Research Institute, 2000. 205 pp., 7 color, 37 b/w plates, 3 maps, 24 figures, bibliography, no index. Paper 600 rupees. No ISBN. Distinctive Beads in Ancient India. Maurya Jyotsna. BAR International Series 864. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2000. 122 pp., 1 map, 10 figures, 7 tables, bibliography, index. Paper cover. ISBN 1-84171-067-9. Amulets and Pendants in Ancient Maharashtra. Maurya Jyotsna. New Delhi: D. K. Printworld, 2000. 102 pp., 4 maps, 12 figures, 3 tables, bibliography, index. Cloth 220 rupees. ISBN 81-246-0158-5. Reviewed by PETER FRANCIS JR. (1945-2003), former Director of the Centerfor Bead Research, Lake Placid, New York India is one of the world's largest countries rate with him on a book. That project with one of its most ancient civilizations. never happened, as Dikshit passed away in Blessed with immense natural and human 19(}9, just before his own History (?f Indian resources. It is no surprise that it is a lead­ Class was published. ing source of beads in both ancient and Deo received a fellowship from the In­ modern times. Only China is larger and as dian Council of Historical Research to ancient, but the Chinese have never been study and prepare a manuscript on Indian as interested in beads as have the Indians. beads during the years 1985 to 1988. He The Indian subcontinent has been unparal­ worked on the project for many years, long leled in terms of bead making, bead trad­ after the period of the fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Sculptures-Indus Period
    UNITl SCULPTURES-INDUS PERIOD Structure 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives 1.3 The Indus Valley Civilization - Background 1.4 Sculptural Art Engraving - Seals Rounded Sculptures 1.5 Stylistic Features 1.6 Representational Examples 1.7 Summary 1.8 Self-Assessment Questions 1.9 Terminal Questions. 1.10 Answers to Terminal Questions 1.1 INTRODUCTION In the previous unit you have studied the different techniques followed by Indian sculptors during historical times. In every period the sculptures are created in different styles. This shows the artistic achievements of the respective period. In this unit we shall discuss the sculpture as developed in the Indus Valley civilization. 1.2 OBJECTIVES After reading this unit you will be able to: • describe the Indus civilization and the sculptures of the period; • discuss about the subjects chosen for sculptures; • explain the types of sculptures; and • discuss about the trends and approaches in sculpture of Indus period. 1.3 INDUS VALLEYCIVILIZATION -BACKGROUND The Indus Valley civilization, which flourished from 3000 BC, marked the beginning of a great civilization in the sub-continent. It was situated on the banks of the Indus and Saraswati rivers and their tributaries initially. Later it extended into Ganges- Yamuna Doab region and also into Afghanistan. Among the settlements were the major urban centres ofHarappa and Mohenjodaro located in Pakistan, Lothal, Rangpur, Surkothada, Kalibangan, Rakhigarhi, Dholavira, Daimabad, Kunal and many other places located .in India. The famous archaeologists who have discovered many of these sites and conducting research on various aspects are John Marshcll, a.B.Lal, S.R.Rao, Bhist, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalibangan (Pre – Harappan Settlement)
    Kalibangan (Pre – Harappan Settlement) Dr. Dilip Kumar Assistant Professor (Guest) Dept. of Ancient Indian History & Archaeology, Patna University, Patna Paper – CC-XI, Sem. – III Kalibangan is a town located at 29.47°N 74.13°E on the left or southern banks of the Ghaggar (Ghaggar - Hakra River) in Rajasthan. The Kalibangan pre-historic site was discovered by Luigi Pio Tessitori, an Italian Indologists (1887–1919). He was doing some research in ancient Indian texts and was surprised by the character of ruins in that area. He sought help from Sir John Marshall of the Archaeological Survey of India. At that time the ASI was conducting excavations at Harappa, but they were unaware of the significance of the ruins. In fact, Tessitori was the first person to recognize that the ruins were 'Prehistoric' and pre-Mauryan. Luigi Pio Tessitori also pointed out the nature of the culture, but at that time it was not possible to guess that the ruins of Kalibangan lay within the Indus Valley Civilization. He died five years before the Harappan culture was formally recognized. After India's independence, both the major Harappan cities together with the Indus became a part of Pakistan and Indian archaeologists were compelled to intensify the search for Harappan sites in India. Amlanand Ghosh (Ex. Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, or ASI) was the first person to recognise this site as Harappan and marked it out for excavations. Under the leadership of B. B. Lal (then Director General, ASI), Balkrishna (B.K.) Thapar, M. D. Khare, K. M. Shrivastava and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book
    EXCAVATIONS AT RAKHIGARHI [1997-98 to 1999-2000] Dr. Amarendra Nath Archaeological Survey of India 1 DR. AMARENDRA NATH RAKHIGARHI EXCAVATION Former Director (Archaeology) ASI Report Writing Unit O/o Superintending Archaeologist ASI, Excavation Branch-II, Purana Qila, New Delhi, 110001 Dear Dr. Tewari, Date: 31.12.2014 Please refer to your D.O. No. 24/1/2014-EE Dated 5th June, 2014 regarding report writing on the excavations at Rakhigarhi. As desired, I am enclosing a draft report on the excavations at Rakhigarhi drawn on the lines of the “Wheeler Committee Report-1965”. The report highlights the facts of excavations, its objective, the site and its environment, site catchment analysis, cultural stratigraphy, structural remains, burials, graffiti, ceramics, terracotta, copper, other finds with two appendices. I am aware of the fact that the report under submission is incomplete in its presentation in terms modern inputs required in an archaeological report. You may be aware of the fact that the ground staff available to this section is too meagre to cope up the work of report writing. The services of only one semiskilled casual labour engaged to this section has been withdrawn vide F. No. 9/66/2014-15/EB-II496 Dated 01.12.2014. The Assistant Archaeologist who is holding the charge antiquities and records of Rakhigarhi is available only when he is free from his office duty in the Branch. The services of a darftsman accorded to this unit are hardly available. Under the circumstances it is requested to restore the services of one semiskilled casual labour earlier attached to this unit and draftsman of the Excavation Branch II Purana Quila so as to enable the unit to function smoothly with limited hands and achieve the target.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods and Problems in the Site Census Approach: a View from Mewar Through Archaeology and Ethnohistory
    Methods and Problems in the Site Census Approach: A View from Mewar through Archaeology and Ethnohistory Namita Sugandhi1, Teresa P. Raczek2, Prabodh Shirvalkar3, Charles K. Brummeler2 and Lalit Pandey4 1. Hartwick College, One Hartwick Drive, Oneonta, NY 13820, USA (Email: [email protected]) 2. Kennesaw State University, 402 Bartow Ave, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA (Email: [email protected]; [email protected]) 3. Deccan College Post‐graduate and Research Institute, Yerwada, Pune –411006, Maharashtra, India (Email: [email protected]) 4. J.R.N. Rajasthan Vidyapeeth University, Pratap Nagar, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India (Email: [email protected]) Received: 30October 2015; Accepted: 08November 2015; Revised: 22 November 2015 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 3 (2015): 163‐179 Abstract: The practice of conducting a regional census has some similarities but many differences from systematic archaeological survey. Both attempt to study “sites”, or material traces of human activities in the past, but the idea of an archaeological “census” utilizes a more informal approach to visiting sites that have been previously documented by earlier researchers. Archaeological census has the goal of assessing site destruction, degradation, and various issues associated with heritage management. The method can provide valuable data about the current status of sites and serve as an expedient tool for future research planning as well as in the development of community and cultural resource management strategies. In this paper, we present census details from a multi‐year project conducted in the Mewar Plain of Rajasthan, outlining our methods and the various conditions that shaped our approach and results, emphasizing in particular the role of ethnohistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Identity in the Indus Civilization: a Multi-Site Isotopic Mortuary Analysis
    IMMIGRANT IDENTITY IN THE INDUS CIVILIZATION: A MULTI-SITE ISOTOPIC MORTUARY ANALYSIS By BENJAMIN THOMAS VALENTINE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Benjamin Thomas Valentine 2 To Shannon 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Truly, I have stood on the shoulders of my betters to reach this point in my career. I could never have completed this dissertation without the unfailing support of my family, friends, and colleagues, both at home and abroad. I am grateful, most of all, for my wife, Shannon Chillingworth. I am humbled by the sacrifices she has made for dreams not her own. I can never repay her for the gifts she has given me, nor will she ever call my debt due. Shannon—thank you. I am likewise indebted to the scholars and institutions that have facilitated my graduate research these past eight years. Foremost among them is my faculty advisor, John Krigbaum, who took a chance on me, an aspiring researcher with little anthropological training, and welcomed me into the University of Florida (UF) Bone Chemistry Lab. I have worked hard not to fail him, as he has never failed me. Under John Krigbaum’s mentorship, I have earned my chance to succeed in academe. During my time at UF, I have benefited from the efforts of many excellent faculty members, but I am especially grateful to James Davidson, Department of Anthropology and George Kamenov and Jason Curtis, Department of Geological Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Burial Practices in the Late / Post-Urban Harappan Phase During the Second
    A Survey of Burial Practices in the Late/Post-Urban Harappan Phase during the Second and First Millennium BCE V.N. Prabhakar1 1. Indian Institute of Technology, Gandhinagar, VGEC Campus, Ahmedabad – 382424, Gujarat, India (Email: [email protected]) Received: 03 September 2015; Accepted: 26 September 2015; Revised: 14 October 2015 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 3 (2015): 54-83 Abstract: The Harappan civilization flourished during 2600 – 1900 BCE and among the several traits it is known for, burial practices one among them. A long tradition of burying the dead can be witnessed during the preceding phases of Harappan civilization, which could have contributed to a larger extent in the overall architecture and arrangement of burial furniture of Harappan phase. The patterns in which the burials were built indicate different socio-cultural belief systems in place quite distinct indifferent regions. A survey of the burial practices during the late/post-urban Harappan phase indicates not only re- emergence of certain traits in the form of urn burials/post-cremation burials, but also continuation of Harappan forms also. This paper is aimed to look into the evidence available so far from late / post-urban Harappan sites, a few examples from Iron Age context also, datable to second and first millennium BCE, to understand the pattern and regional distributions, if any. Keywords: Burial Practices, Pot Burials, Earth Burials, Chalcolithic, Harappan Civilization, Cemetery H, PGW Culture Introduction The disposal of dead and emergence of various burial customs in the south Asian context can be traced back to the Mesolithic period. It has been generally agreed that burials to intern the dead individuals was one among the several modes of disposal of dead during prehistoric and protohistoric times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Master of Animals in Old World Iconography
    The Master of Animals in Old World Iconography Edited by DEREK B. COUNTS and BETTINA ARNOLD BUDAPEST 2010 With the generous support of the Center for Etruscan Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Cover illustrations Glauberg Schnabelkanne. Landesamt für Denkmalpfl ege Hessen, Wiesbaden Volume Editor ERZSÉBET JEREM ISBN 978-963-9911-14-7 HU-ISSN 1215-9239 © The Authors and Archaeolingua Foundation All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without requesting prior permission in writing from the publisher. 2010 ARCHAEOLINGUA ALAPÍTVÁNY H-1250 Budapest, Úri u. 49 Copyediting by Julia Gaviria Desktop editing and layout by Rita Kovács Printed by Prime Rate Kft Master of Animals and Animal Masters in the Iconography of the Indus Tradition JONATHAN MARK KENOYER The Harappan phase of the Indus Tradition is well known for its planned cities, extensive trade networks, specialized technologies, inscribed seals and pottery, and a wide array of artistic depictions including abstract symbols, plants, humans, and animals (KENOYER 2008; POSSEHL 2002a). Although the Indus script has been found on a wide range of objects, the lack of any convincing decipherment (PARPOLA 1994; POSSEHL 1996) has left scholars without any textual reference to aid in the interpretation of these archaeological remains. While it is possible to make meaningful interpretations about the development of urbanism, technology, and trade based solely on the archaeological record, it is more diffi cult to gain insight into the meanings of Indus art and graphic expressions without deciphered texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginning of Agricultural Life in India by Dr.Benudhar Patra
    Beginning of Agricultural Life in India By Dr.Benudhar Patra Geological Ages Archaeological Ages Modes of Life Styles Living Pleistocene Age Paleolithic Lower Hunting-food Nomadic or (Ice Age) From Age Middle gathering migratory life 1.64 to 0.01 Upper million years ago Holocene Age Mesolithic Age Cattle-keeping (Ice-free Age) Neolithic Age or New Stone Agriculture, Settled or From10,000 BCE Age Domestcation sedentary life; of animals transformed the nomadic Chalcolithic Age hunter- gatherers into a sedentary farmer, which led to the beginning of village settlement Earliest Agrarian Settlements: Mehrgarh The evidence of agriculture for the first time is found in the later part of the Neolithic period. The early Neolithic people were primarily cattle-herders and had a pastoral economy, but the later Neolithic settles gradually became agriculturists. They cultivated different crops and used to live in circular or rectangular houses made of mud and reed. The earliest known agrarian settlements in the Indian subcontinent, however, come from the west of the Indus system. Mehrgarh, in the northeastern Baluchistan was the first village to witness the beginning of agriculture in India in the 5th millennium BCE. The village of Mehrgarh was the first to witness the transition from the Neolithic to the Chalcolithic phase. The presence of agriculture at Mehrgarh is attested by finds of seeds like naked six-row barley, different types of wheets etc. 1 Agriculture seems to have given an impetus to animal domestication. During the next two millennia i.e. from c. 5000 BCE to c. 3000 BCE north-western India witnessed not only the transition from Neolithic to the Chalcolithic stage but also a great expansion of agrarian settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Residues in Pottery from the Indus Civilisation in Northwest India
    This is a repository copy of Lipid residues in pottery from the Indus Civilisation in northwest India. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/168890/ Version: Published Version Article: Suryanarayan, Akshyeta, Cubas, Miriam, Craig, Oliver E. orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-8402 et al. (5 more authors) (2021) Lipid residues in pottery from the Indus Civilisation in northwest India. Journal of archaeological science. 105291. ISSN 0305-4403 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105291 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Journal of Archaeological Science 125 (2021) 105291 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Lipid residues in pottery from the Indus Civilisation in northwest India Akshyeta Suryanarayan a,b,*, Miriam Cubas c,c, Oliver E. Craig d, Carl P. Heron e, Vasant S. Shinde f, Ravindra N. Singh g, Tamsin C.
    [Show full text]