Fishery Name Fishery Are Shown As Appendix 1.1 to This Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fishery Name Fishery Are Shown As Appendix 1.1 to This Report Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Suriname Atlantic Seabob Shrimp MSC SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES CERTIFICATION Suriname Atlantic Seabob Shrimp Public Comment Draft Report October 2016 Prepared For: Heiploeg, Member of the PP Group Prepared By: Acoura Marine Ltd Acoura Marine Full Assessment Template per MSC V2.0 02/12/2015 Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Suriname Atlantic Seabob Shrimp Public Comment Draft Report October 2016 Authors: Tristan Southall, Rob Blyth-Skyrme and John Tremblay Certification Body: Client: Acoura Marine Heiploeg, Member of the PP Group Address: Address: 6 Redheughs Rigg Heiploeg Edinburgh Member of the PP Group, Heiploeg International BV EH12 9DQ P.O. Box 2 Scotland, UK NL – 9974 ZG Zoutkamp Netherlands Name: Fisheries Department Name: Mark Nijhof Tel: +44(0) 131 335 6601 Tel: +31 (0)595 40 55 55 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.Acoura.com Page 2 of 168 version 3.0(24/03/15) Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Suriname Atlantic Seabob Shrimp Contents Glossary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. Authorship and Peer Reviewers .................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Assessment Team .................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.1 Peer Reviewers ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 RBF Training ........................................................................................................................ 10 3. Description of the Fishery .......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Unit(s) of Certification and scope of certification sought ....................................................... 11 3.2 Overview of the fishery .......................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Area Under Evaluation .................................................................................................. 11 3.2.2 The Fishery Client ......................................................................................................... 12 3.2.5 The Target Species ....................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Principle One: Target Species Background .......................................................................... 16 3.3.1 Biology and ecology in Suriname waters ...................................................................... 16 3.3.2 Trophic status of seabob in Suriname waters ............................................................... 17 3.3.3 Stock Status & Assessment Methodology .................................................................... 18 3.3.4 History of fishing and management............................................................................... 20 3.4 Principle Two: Ecosystem Background ................................................................................. 22 3.4.1 Retained species ........................................................................................................... 23 3.4.2 Bycatch species ............................................................................................................ 23 3.4.3 ETP Species .................................................................................................................. 24 3.4.4 Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.5 Ecosystem ..................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Principle Three: Management System Background.............................................................. 29 3.5.1 Jurisdiction .................................................................................................................... 29 3.5.2 Recognised Groups ...................................................................................................... 29 3.5.3 Management Plan ......................................................................................................... 29 3.5.4 Decision-making process .............................................................................................. 30 3.5.5 Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 31 3.5.6 Monitoring Control & Surveillance ................................................................................. 31 4. Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................................. 32 4.1 Harmonised Fishery Assessment ......................................................................................... 32 4.2 Previous assessments .......................................................................................................... 32 4.3 Assessment Methodologies .................................................................................................. 33 4.3.1 Assessment Tree ................................................................................................................. 33 4.4 Evaluation Processes and Techniques ................................................................................. 33 4.4.1Site Visits............................................................................................................................... 33 4.4.2 Consultation outcomes......................................................................................................... 34 Page 3 of 168 version 3.0(24/03/15) Acoura Marine Public Comment Draft Report Suriname Atlantic Seabob Shrimp 4.4.3 Evaluation Techniques ......................................................................................................... 35 4.4.4 RBF Use ............................................................................................................................... 36 5. Traceability .................................................................................................................................. 37 5.1 Eligibility Date ........................................................................................................................ 37 5.2 Traceability within the Fishery ............................................................................................... 37 5.2.1 Tracking, Tracing and Segregation Systems ....................................................................... 37 5.2.2 Evaluation of Risk of Vessels Fishing Outside of UoC ........................................................ 37 5.2.3 Risk of Substitution of Mixing Certified / Non-Certified Catch prior to point of landing ........ 37 5.2.4 At-Sea Processing ............................................................................................................... 37 5.2.5 Trans-Shipment .................................................................................................................... 37 5.3 Eligibility to Enter Further Chains of Custody ....................................................................... 37 5.3.1 Eligible points of landing ...................................................................................................... 38 5.3.2 Parties eligible to use the fishery certificate ......................................................................... 38 6. Evaluation Results ...................................................................................................................... 39 6.1 Principle Level Scores ........................................................................................................... 39 6.2 Summary of Scores ............................................................................................................... 39 6.3 Summary of Conditions ......................................................................................................... 40 6.3.1 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 40 6.4 Determination, Formal Conclusion and Agreement .................................................................... 41 7. References ................................................................................................................................... 42 Appendix 1. Scoring & Rationale ...................................................................................................... 44 MSC Principles & Criteria .................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix 1.1 Performance Indicator Scores and Rationale ............................................................ 47 Principle 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 47 Principle 2 ...................................................................................................................................... 67 Principle
Recommended publications
  • Faunistic Resources Used As Medicines by Artisanal Fishermen from Siribinha Beach, State of Bahia, Brazil'
    Journal of Ethnobiology 20(1): 93-109 Summer 2000 FAUNISTIC RESOURCES USED AS MEDICINES BY ARTISANAL FISHERMEN FROM SIRIBINHA BEACH, STATE OF BAHIA, BRAZIL' ERALOO M. COSTA-NETOAND jost GERALOO w. MARQUES Departamento de CiCllcias BioJ6gicas Universidade Estadual de Feim de Santana, Km 3, 8R 116, Call/pus Ulliversitririo, CEP 44031-460, Feirn de Salltalla, Bahia, Brasil ABSTRACT.- Artisanal fishermen from Siribinha Beach in the State of Bahia, Northeastern Brazil, have been using several marine/estuarine animal resources as folk medicines. Wf.> hilve recorded the employment of mollusks, crustaceans, echinoderms, fishes, reptiles, and cetace<lns, and noted a high predominance of fishes over other aquatic animals. Asthma, bronchitis, stroke, and wounds arc the most usual illnesses treated by animal-based medicines. These results corroborate Marques' zoothcrapeutic universality hypothesis. According to him, all human cultures that prcscnt a developed medical system do use animals as medicines. Further studies are requested in order to estimate the existence of bioactive compounds of ph<lrmacological value in these bioresources. Key words: Fishennen, marine resources, medicine, Bahia, Brazil RESUMO.-Pescadores artcsanais da Praia de Siribinha, estado da Bahia, Nordeste do Brasil, utilizam varios recursos animais marinhos/estuarinos como remedios populares. Registramos 0 e.mprego de moluscos, crustaceos, equinoderrnos, peixes, repteis e cetaceos. Observou-se uma alta predominilncia de peixes sobre outros animais aquaticos. Asma, bronquite, derrame e ferimentos sao as afecr;6es mais usualmente tratadas com remedios Ii. base de animais. Estes resultados corroboram a hip6tese da universalidadc zooterapeutica de Marqucs. De <lcordo com cle, toda cultura humana quc .1preSe.nta urn sistema medico desenvolvido utiliza-se de animais como remlidios, Estudos posteriores sao neccssarios a fim de avaliar a existcncia de compostos bioativos de valor farmacol6gico nesses biorrecursos.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae)
    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Bunkley-Williams, Lucy; Williams, Jr., Ernest H.; Bashirullah, Abul K.M. Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 54, núm. 3, diciembre, 2006, pp. 175-188 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44920193024 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Lucy Bunkley-Williams,1 Ernest H. Williams, Jr.2 & Abul K.M. Bashirullah3 1 Caribbean Aquatic Animal Health Project, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9012, Mayagüez, PR 00861, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 908, Lajas, Puerto Rico 00667, USA; ewil- [email protected] 3 Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela. Author for Correspondence: LBW, address as above. Telephone: 1 (787) 832-4040 x 3900 or 265-3837 (Administrative Office), x 3936, 3937 (Research Labs), x 3929 (Office); Fax: 1-787-834-3673; [email protected] Received 01-VI-2006. Corrected 02-X-2006. Accepted 13-X-2006. Abstract: The parasitic isopod fauna of fishes in the southern Caribbean is poorly known. In examinations of 12 639 specimens of 187 species of Venezuelan fishes, the authors found 10 species in three families of isopods (Gnathiids, Gnathia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartilaginous Fishes (Class Chondrichthyes) Off Ceará State, Brazil, Western Equatorial Atlantic - an Update
    CARTILAGINOUS FISHES (CLASS CHONDRICHTHYES) OFF CEARÁ STATE, BRAZIL, WESTERN EQUATORIAL ATLANTIC - AN UPDATE Peixes cartilaginosos (Classe Chondrichthyes) do Estado do Ceará, Brasil, Atlântico Equatorial Ocidental - uma atualização Arquivos de Ciências do Mar Bruno Jucá-Queiroz1,* Jones Santander-Neto1, Ricardo Silveira de Medeiros1, Francisco C. P. Nascimento1, Manuel Antonio de Andrade Furtado-Neto1,2, Vicente Vieira Faria2, Getulio Rincon3 RESUMO Aproximadamente 1.100 espécies de Chondrichthyes (tubarões, raias e quimeras) são hoje conhecidas mundialmente. O inventário faunístico mais recente para águas brasileiras compilou a ocorrência de 160 espécies de elasmobrânquios (tubarões e raias). Entretanto, o conhecimento pleno da riqueza de espécies de Chondrichthyes no Brasil ainda está longe de ser alcançada porque faltam pesquisas no campo de inventários faunísticos. Isto se deve à falta de recursos para pesquisa e conservação. Os peixes cartilaginosos não recebem prioridade de financiamento de pesquisa porque geralmente não são alvo direto de pescarias. Até o presente momento, sabe-se que 50 espécies de elasmobrânquios ocorrem em águas ao largo do Estado do Ceará. O objetivo do presente estudo foi de atualizar o registro de ocorrência de peixes cartilaginosos ao largo do Ceará. Os novos registros foram obtidos durante monitoramento a bordo de pescarias industriais, bem como do monitoramento de desembarque de pescarias industriais e artesanais e um cruzeiro de pesquisas. Este esforço foi complementado com examinação de espécimens de uma coleção ictiológica local, registros de literatura e fotográficos. Os oito novos registros são: Cirrhigaleus asper, Breviraja cf. spinosa, Dipturus sp., Dasyatis geijskesi, Himantura cf. schmardae, Manta birostris, Mobula thurstoni e Hydrolagus sp. Além disto, obteve-se também informação sobre a ocorrência Rhinobatos lentiginosus no Estado.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Fishers' Knowledge for Sustainable Management in The
    Using fishers’ knowledge for sustainable management in the artisanal gillnet fishery in Suriname Sophie Hankinson [email protected] Msc Sustainable Development – International Development Student number 5713544 Utrecht University Supervisor: Kei Otsuki Internship: WWF Guianas, Suriname Supervisor: Hanneke van Lavieren August 2019 Summary The increasing demand for fish is putting pressure on wild fish stocks worldwide. Although artisanal fisheries play a key role for people’s livelihoods and food security, these fisheries are often overlooked or undervalued in fisheries’ policy and management. Next to the target species, fisheries also put pressure on other species that are caught in fishery operations. This so-called bycatch is an important driver of population declines in several species of elasmobranchs (sharks, rays, skates and sawfish), marine mammals, seabirds and turtles. There is an increasing interest in the local ecological knowledge of fishers about marine ecosystems. This can be associated with recent attempts of fisheries management to develop more sustainable approaches while also including a local ‘voice’. There is a limited amount of studies on the use of local ecological knowledge in fisheries in Suriname. Hence, this case study, which was part of the author’s internship at the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Guianas, explored what local ecological knowledge fishers from the artisanal gillnet fishery in Suriname hold and its (potential) role in fisheries management and conservation efforts by answering the following research question: How can fishers’ knowledge be incorporated in fishery management and marine conservation efforts? All respondents are experiencing a decline in the volume in catches of most fish species and they attribute this to increased fishing effort (both artisanal and industrial).
    [Show full text]
  • FISHES (C) Val Kells–November, 2019
    VAL KELLS Marine Science Illustration 4257 Ballards Mill Road - Free Union - VA - 22940 www.valkellsillustration.com [email protected] STOCK ILLUSTRATION LIST FRESHWATER and SALTWATER FISHES (c) Val Kells–November, 2019 Eastern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico: brackish and saltwater fishes Subject to change. New illustrations added weekly. Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa Sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus Deepwater chimaera, Hydrolagus affinis Atlantic spearnose chimaera, Rhinochimaera atlantica Nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum Whale shark, Rhincodon typus Sand tiger, Carcharias taurus Ragged-tooth shark, Odontaspis ferox Crocodile Shark, Pseudocarcharias kamoharai Thresher shark, Alopias vulpinus Bigeye thresher, Alopias superciliosus Basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus White shark, Carcharodon carcharias Shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Longfin mako, Isurus paucus Porbeagle, Lamna nasus Freckled Shark, Scyliorhinus haeckelii Marbled catshark, Galeus arae Chain dogfish, Scyliorhinus retifer Smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis Smalleye Smoothhound, Mustelus higmani Dwarf Smoothhound, Mustelus minicanis Florida smoothhound, Mustelus norrisi Gulf Smoothhound, Mustelus sinusmexicanus Blacknose shark, Carcharhinus acronotus Bignose shark, Carcharhinus altimus Narrowtooth Shark, Carcharhinus brachyurus Spinner shark, Carcharhinus brevipinna Silky shark, Carcharhinus faiformis Finetooth shark, Carcharhinus isodon Galapagos Shark, Carcharhinus galapagensis Bull shark, Carcharinus leucus Blacktip shark, Carcharhinus limbatus Oceanic whitetip shark,
    [Show full text]
  • Guyana Seabob Fishery
    Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Sustainable Fisheries Scheme Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Assessment Guyana Seabob Fishery Public Comment Draft Report Report on the 1st full assessment of the fishery Conformity Assessment Body: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Fishery Client Guyana Association of Trawler Owners and Seafood Processors Report Date May 2019 Assessment Team Members / Authors: Tristan Southall, Team Leader Julian Addison Bert Keus Assessment Secretary: Gunnar Á. Gunnarsson Conformity Assessment Body: Client: Vottunarstofan Tún ehf. Guyana Association of Trawler Owners and Þarabakki 3 Seafood Processors (GATOSP) IS-109 Reykjavík Area K Houston, East Bank Demerara Iceland Guyana Tel.: +354 511 1330 Tel: +592 225 2111 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Public Comment Draft Report – Guyana Seabob Fishery page i Contents Glossary .................................................................................................................................................. vi 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Scope of the Assessment ........................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Assessment Team Members and Secretary ............................................................................ 8 1.3 Outline of the Assessment ...................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Main Strengths and
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Elasmobranch Escape from Turtle Excluder Devices
    Fisheries Research 224 (2020) 105456 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fisheries Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fishres Factors affecting elasmobranch escape from turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in a tropical penaeid-trawl fishery T Matthew J. Campbella,d,*, Mark L. Tonksb, Margaret Millerb, David T. Brewerc, Anthony J. Courtneya, Colin A. Simpfendorferd a Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Agri-Science Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, GPO Box 267, Brisbane, Queensland, 4001, Australia b Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Oceans and Atmosphere, QLD Biosciences Precinct, Building 80, Services Road, St Lucia, Queensland, 4067, Australia c David Brewer Consulting, 91 Raeburn Street, Manly West, Queensland, 4179, Australia d Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, James Cook University, 1 James Cook Drive, Townsville, Queensland, 4811, Australia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Handled by Bent Herrmann The use of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) has resulted in fewer elasmobranchs (i.e. sharks and rays) caught in fi fi ff Keywords: tropical penaeid-trawl sheries. However, very few studies in the primary literature have quanti ed the e ects Turtle excluder device of various TED design aspects affecting the escape of elasmobranchs. Data collected by observers on board TED commercial trawlers operating in Australia’s northern prawn fishery (NPF) during 2001 were re-examined to Elasmobranch quantify the effect of TEDs on catches of various elasmobranchs. During this sampling, a total of 6204 elas- Discards mobranchs were caught from 1440 net trawls. The 34 species identified, from 15 families and four taxonomic Grid orientation orders, were dominated by small carcharhinids (n = 2160, median total length = 75 cm) and dasyatids Bar space (n = 2030, median disc width = 24 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List February 2007 Sorted on Scientific Name
    ASFIS ISSCAAP Fish List Sorted on Scientific Name February 2007 Scientific name English Name French name Spanish Name Code Abalistes stellaris (Bloch & Schneider 1801) Starry triggerfish AJS Abbottina rivularis (Basilewsky 1855) Chinese false gudgeon ABB Ablabys binotatus (Peters 1855) Redskinfish ABW Ablennes hians (Valenciennes 1846) Flat needlefish Orphie plate Agujón sable BAF Aborichthys elongatus Hora 1921 ABE Abralia andamanika Goodrich 1898 BLK Abralia veranyi (Rüppell 1844) Verany's enope squid Encornet de Verany Enoploluria de Verany BLJ Abraliopsis pfefferi (Verany 1837) Pfeffer's enope squid Encornet de Pfeffer Enoploluria de Pfeffer BJF Abramis brama (Linnaeus 1758) Freshwater bream Brème d'eau douce Brema común FBM Abramis spp Freshwater breams nei Brèmes d'eau douce nca Bremas nep FBR Abramites eques (Steindachner 1878) ABQ Abudefduf luridus (Cuvier 1830) Canary damsel AUU Abudefduf saxatilis (Linnaeus 1758) Sergeant-major ABU Abyssobrotula galatheae Nielsen 1977 OAG Abyssocottus elochini Taliev 1955 AEZ Abythites lepidogenys (Smith & Radcliffe 1913) AHD Acanella spp Branched bamboo coral KQL Acanthacaris caeca (A. Milne Edwards 1881) Atlantic deep-sea lobster Langoustine arganelle Cigala de fondo NTK Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate 1888 Prickly deep-sea lobster Langoustine spinuleuse Cigala raspa NHI Acanthalburnus microlepis (De Filippi 1861) Blackbrow bleak AHL Acanthaphritis barbata (Okamura & Kishida 1963) NHT Acantharchus pomotis (Baird 1855) Mud sunfish AKP Acanthaxius caespitosa (Squires 1979) Deepwater mud lobster Langouste
    [Show full text]
  • (TED) in Reducing the Bycatch of Elasmobranchs in the Atlantic Seabob (Xiphopenaeus Kroyeri) Industrial Trawl Fishery of Guyana
    CERMES Technical Report No. 87 The effectiveness of a modified turtle excluder device (TED) in reducing the bycatch of elasmobranchs in the Atlantic seabob (Xiphopenaeus kroyeri) industrial trawl fishery of Guyana A. GARSTIN, H.A. OXENFORD AND D. MAISON Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies (CERMES) Faculty of Science and Technology, The University of the West Indies Cave Hill Campus, Barbados 2017 ABSTRACT The Atlantic seabob (Xiphopenaeus kroyeri) trawl fishery is extremely important to Guyana, with some 88 licensed industrial trawling vessels harvesting around 15,000 mt per year, almost all of which is exported to the US and EU, representing Guyana’s most valuable seafood export. The key player in this industry, the Guyana Association of Private Trawler Owners and Seafood Processors (GAPTO&SP) is taking pro-active steps in pursuing Marine Stewardship Council certification for the seabob trawl fishery to ensure top market prices and long-term sustainability of the seabob stock. To this end, all commercial vessels in the fleet are using turtle excluder devices (TEDs) and bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) in their trawl nets. However, the effectiveness of these devices in reducing the bycatch of vulnerable sharks and rays has not yet been examined. This study, requested by GAPTO&SP, represents the first attempt to document the bycatch of these discarded species by the seabob trawl fleet, and to compare the effectiveness of two different TED designs. Over the period July-August 2014, five trips were taken on three different seabob vessels to document the species, sizes and condition of all sharks and rays landed and discarded during the normal 24 hour-day operation of the vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Histopathological and Biometric Comparison Between Catfish (Pisces Ariidae) from a Harbor and a Protected Area Brazil
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/266615068 Histopathological and biometric comparison between catfish (Pisces Ariidae) from a harbor and a protected area Brazil ARTICLE in AQUATIC BIOSYSTEMS · OCTOBER 2014 DOI: 10.1186/s12999-014-0012-5 READS 37 5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Raimunda Nonata Fortes Carvalho-Neta Débora Batista Pinheiro Sousa Estadual University of Maranhão Federal University of Maranhão 18 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS 8 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Ligia Tchaicka Universidade Estadual do Maranhão, Brazil 4 PUBLICATIONS 52 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Débora Batista Pinheiro Sousa Retrieved on: 30 September 2015 A histopathological and biometric comparison between catfish (Pisces, Ariidae) from a harbor and a protected area, Brazil Raimunda Nonata Fortes Carvalho Neta1* * Corresponding author Email: [email protected] Débora Batista Pinheiro Sousa2 Email: [email protected] Zafira da Silva de Almeida1 Email: [email protected] Débora Martins Silva Santos1 Email: [email protected] Ligia Tchaicka1 Email: [email protected] 1 Department of Chemistry and Biology, State University of Maranhão (UEMA), São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil 2 Postgraduate Program of Aquatic Resources and Fishery (PPGRAP/UEMA), State University of Maranhão, São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil Abstract Background Histopathological lesions and biometric variations in catfish species are statistically associated with chemical contaminant exposure. A histopathological and biometric database for the catfish Sciades herzbergii and Bagre bagre from São Luís Island (Port Area) and Caranguejos Island (Reference Area) is presented. Branchial and hepatic lesions were classified into three reaction patterns: 1) circulatory or inflammatory disturbances; 2) regressive changes; 3) progressive changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Commercialized Fish in Northeastern Pará, Coastal Amazon: the Case of the Street Market in Bragança-Pa
    http://dx.doi.org/10.32360/acmar.v54i1.43960 ISSN 0374-5686 Thais Sousa Martins, et al. e-ISSN 2526-7639 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Arquivos de Ciências do Mar DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF COMMERCIALIZED FISH IN NORTHEASTERN PARÁ, COASTAL AMAZON: THE CASE OF THE STREET MARKET IN BRAGANÇA-PA Diversidade e abundância dos peixes comercializados no nordeste paraense, Amazônia costeira: o caso da feira livre de Bragança-PA Thais Sousa Martins1, Raimundo Darley Figueiredo da Silva1, Ivana Barbosa Veneza2, Paula da Con- ceição Praxedes Santana1, Rafael Ramos Correa3, Nicolly Caroliny Negrão Santa Brígida4, Jakson da Silva Gonçalves4, Rita de Cássia Martins da Silva5, David Carvalho de Mesquita5, Ítalo Antônio de Freitas Lutz6, Grazielle Fernanda Evangelista Gomes5 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Ambiental (UFPA/Iecos), Universidade Federal do Pará, campus Bragança 2 Curso de Engenharia de Aquicultura (Ufopa), Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, campus Monte Alegre 3 Engenheiro de Pesca (UFPA/Iecos), Universidade Federal do Pará, campus Bragança. E-mail:[email protected] 4 Biólogo (UFPA/Iecos), Universidade Federal do Pará, campus Bragança 5 Curso de Engenharia de Pesca (UFPA/Iecos), Universidade Federal do Pará, campus Bragança. E-mail: [email protected] 6 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal (UFPA), Universidade Federal do Pará, campus Castanhal ABSTRACT Bragança is an important municipality in Brazil regarding fishery production. In spite of its important for regional economy, data related to local fisheries such as the production and consumption profiles of commercial species are scarce. Therefore, the goal of this study was to provide an inventory of commercialized fishes in the street market of Bragança along with commercialization parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) Associated with Venezuelan Marine Fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii)
    Isopods (Isopoda: Aegidae, Cymothoidae, Gnathiidae) associated with Venezuelan marine fishes (Elasmobranchii, Actinopterygii) Lucy Bunkley-Williams,1 Ernest H. Williams, Jr.2 & Abul K.M. Bashirullah3 1 Caribbean Aquatic Animal Health Project, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 9012, Mayagüez, PR 00861, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, P.O. Box 908, Lajas, Puerto Rico 00667, USA; ewil- [email protected] 3 Instituto Oceanografico de Venezuela, Universidad de Oriente, Cumaná, Venezuela. Author for Correspondence: LBW, address as above. Telephone: 1 (787) 832-4040 x 3900 or 265-3837 (Administrative Office), x 3936, 3937 (Research Labs), x 3929 (Office); Fax: 1-787-834-3673; [email protected] Received 01-VI-2006. Corrected 02-X-2006. Accepted 13-X-2006. Abstract: The parasitic isopod fauna of fishes in the southern Caribbean is poorly known. In examinations of 12 639 specimens of 187 species of Venezuelan fishes, the authors found 10 species in three families of isopods (Gnathiids, Gnathia spp. from Diplectrum radiale*, Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*, Orthopristis ruber* and Trachinotus carolinus*; two aegids, Rocinela signata from Dasyatis guttata*, H. cruentatus*, Haemulon auro- lineatum*, H. steindachneri* and O. ruber; and Rocinela sp. from Epinephelus flavolimbatus*; five cymothoids: Anilocra haemuli from Haemulon boschmae*, H. flavolineatum* and H. steindachneri*; Anilocra cf haemuli from Heteropriacanthus cruentatus*; Haemulon bonariense*, O. ruber*, Cymothoa excisa in H. cruentatus*; Cymothoa oestrum in Chloroscombrus chrysurus, H. cruentatus* and Priacanthus arenatus; Cymothoa sp. in O. ruber; Livoneca sp. from H. cruentatus*; and Nerocila fluviatilis from H. cruentatus* and P. arenatus*). The Rocinela sp. and A.
    [Show full text]