Yala Swamp, Siaya County, Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yala Swamp, Siaya County, Kenya AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECT OF IRRIGATION PROJECTS ON WETLANDS: YALA SWAMP, SIAYA COUNTY, KENYA By NYAKUNDI LYDIA KEMUNTO C50/88041/2016 DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF ARTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI © 2018 DECLARATION I hereby declare that this project report is my original work and that it has not been submitted for examination in any institution of higher education for the award of any degree. …………………………………………. …………………………… Nyakundi Lydia Kemunto Date C50/88041/2016 This project report has been submitted for examination with the approval of the following university supervisors. ………………………………………….. ………………………........... Dr. Alice Odingo Date Department of Geography and Environmental studies, University of Nairobi. ………………………………………….. ………………………........... Dr. Mikalitsa S. Mukhovi Date Department of Geography and Environmental studies, University of Nairobi i DEDICATION To my parents Mr. Stanley Nyakundi And The Late Billiah Bitengo, My husband, Seth Odongo And My daughter Ariana Bitengo Who have been my source of inspiration, motivation and encouragement throughout this period ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, my sincere gratitude to God for this far. Secondly to my supervisors Dr. Alice Odingo and Mikalitsa S. Mukhovi for their support, guidance, insights and comments throughout the research period. I wish to acknowledge The University of Nairobi, Department of Geography and Environmental Studies Lecturers for the skills and knowledge gained. I am equally grateful for the Environmental Planning and Management class particularly my classmates Dorothy Kyemboi, Maive Omoruli, Christine Ochieng and Clifford Oketch for their unwavering support and encouragement I also wish to acknowledge my research assistants, in particular Millicent Atieno who assisted me in data collection. I also acknowledge Yala community particularly the local administration and the village elders for their cooperation and participation in surveys, discussions, and interviews Finally a special thanks to my family for the unconditional support both financially, spiritually, academically and emotionally to be the best that I could ever be. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION............................................................................................................................ i DEDICATION............................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF PLATES ....................................................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................... x ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS.................................................................................... xi CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the study ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Problem Statement ................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Research questions ................................................................................................................ 4 1.4 Research objectives............................................................................................................... 4 1.4.1 Main Objective ............................................................................................................... 4 1.4.2 Specific objectives.......................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Hypotheses ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.6 Justification of the study ....................................................................................................... 5 1.7 Scope of the study and limitations ........................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER TWO .......................................................................................................................... 7 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Global Diversity and Distribution of Wetlands..................................................................... 7 2.3 Wetland Services: Ecological and socio-economic Benefits ................................................ 8 2.3.1 Provisional services ........................................................................................................ 9 2.3.2 Regulating Services ........................................................................................................ 9 2.3.3 Supporting Services...................................................................................................... 10 2.3.4 Cultural Services........................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Effects of Irrigation Projects on Wetlands .......................................................................... 11 iv 2.5 Wetlands, irrigation projects and livelihoods...................................................................... 14 2.6 Regulative and Legislative Framework............................................................................... 16 2.6.1 International Policy and Legal Framework .................................................................. 16 2.6.2 Domestic Policy and Legal Framework ....................................................................... 17 2.7 Theoretical Framework: Sustainable Livelihood Approach ............................................... 18 2.8 Conceptual Framework: Ecosystem services and human well-being ................................. 20 CHAPTER THREE.................................................................................................................... 23 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................. 23 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 Study Area........................................................................................................................... 23 3.2.1 Geographical location................................................................................................... 23 3.2.2 Climatic and hydrological characteristics..................................................................... 24 3.2.3 Demographic and socio-economic aspects................................................................... 24 3.3 The history and structure of Dominion Farms Limited....................................................... 26 3.4 Research Design.................................................................................................................. 27 3.5 Target Population ................................................................................................................ 28 3.6 Sampling technique............................................................................................................. 28 3.7 Reliability and Validity....................................................................................................... 29 3.8 Sources of Data ................................................................................................................... 30 3.8.1 Primary data.................................................................................................................. 30 3.8.2 Secondary data.............................................................................................................. 31 3.9 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 32 CHAPTER FOUR....................................................................................................................... 33 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS............................................................................................... 33 4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 General characteristics of respondents................................................................................ 33 4.2.1 Gender .........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Habitat Disturbance on Distribution and Abundance Of
    EFFECTS OF HABITAT DISTURBANCE ON DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF PAPYRUS ENDEMIC BIRDS IN SIO PORT SWAMP, WESTERN KENYA By Stellah Nekesa Wanyonyi (B.Ed Science, Nairobi) (Reg. No. I56/80824/2012) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Science (Biology of Conservation) in the School of Biological Sciences, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI May 2015 i DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my original work and has not been submitted for examination in any other University for the award of a degree. ________________________________ _______________________ Stellah Nekesa Wanyonyi Date (Reg. No. I56/80824/2012) SUPERVISORS This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the university supervisors. ________________________________ _______________________ Dr. Evans Mwangi Date School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi ________________________________ _______________________ Prof. Nathan Gichuki Date School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and the community in Sio Port swamp. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to sincerely thank my supervisors; Dr. Evans Mwangi, Prof. Nathan Gichuki and Prof. Agnes Muthumbi for their effort and time to share knowledge with me. I would also like to thank the following: Mr. Martin Odino from National Museums of Kenya for working as my research assistant throughout the research period; Mr. Mutiso the plant identification specialist at the University of Nairobi Herbarium for assisting in the identification of plant specimens collected from Sio Port Swamp; Mr. Elisha Were for offering a camping site and taking me around the swamp in a canoe; Sio Port Community at large for their warm welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Kenya
    The IUCN Wetlands Programme Wetlands of Kenya Proceedings of a Seminar on Wetlands of Kenya "11 S.A. Crafter , S.G. Njuguna and G.W. Howard Wetlands of Kenya This one TAQ7-31T - 5APQ IUCN- The World Conservation Union Founded in 1948 , IUCN— The World Conservation Union brings together States , government agencies and a diverse range of non - governmental organizations in a unique world partnership : some 650 members in all , spread across 120 countries . As a union , IUCN exists to serve its members — to represent their views on the world stage and to provide them with the concepts , strategies and technical support they need to achieve their goals . Through its six Commissions , IUCN draws together over 5000 expert volunteers in project teams and action groups . A central secretariat coordinates the IUCN Programme and leads initiatives on the conservation and sustainable use of the world's biological diversity and the management of habitats and natural resources , as well as providing a range of services . The Union has helped many countries to prepare National Conservation Strategies , and demonstrates the application of its knowledge through the field projects it supervises . Operations are increasingly decentralized and are carried forward by an expanding network of regional and country offices , located principally in developing countries . IUCN — The World Conservation Union - seeks above all to work with its members to achieve development that is sustainable and that provides a lasting improvement in the quality of life for people all over the world . IUCN Wetlands Programme The IUCN Wetlands Programme coordinates and reinforces activities of the Union concerned with the management of wetland ecosystems .
    [Show full text]
  • Yala Swamp Task Force Report
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF SIAYA P.O. BOX 7 – 40600 SIAYA Email: [email protected] THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF SIAYA FIRST ASSEMBLY –THIRD SESSION-2015 REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, TOURISM, WATER AND DELEGATED LEGISLATION ON YALA SWAMP CLERK’S CHAMBERS, COUNTY ASSEMBY OF SIAYA, ASSEMBLY BUILDINGS, SIAYA DECEMBER, 2015 1 | P a g e ACRONYMS CGS County Government of Siaya MoU Memorandum of Understanding NEMA National Environmental Management Authority KWS Kenya Wildlife Services SOPA Seeds of Peace Africa WARMA Water Resource Management Authority EMCA Environmental Management and Coordination Act EIA Environmental Impact Assessment NGC National Governing Council DDC District Development Committee CECM Chief Executive Committee Member LBDA Lake Basin Development Authority CSOs Civil Society Organizations SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment LUP Land Use Plan FOYS Friends of Yala Swamp CIAG-Community Initiative Action Group Kenya NLP National Land Policy YSGF Yala Swamp group of Farmers CECMCounty Executive Committee Member 2 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 COMMITTEE’S MANDATE ................................................................................................................ 5 4.0 COMMITTEE COMPOSITION............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Options of the Yala Wetland Management for Sustainable Development and Biodiversity Conservation
    OPTIONS OF THE YALA WETLAND MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION F. Mwaura, M., Ngugi, E. Were, E. Kagure, L. Wanjohi, J. Mbuthia, J. Otieno & M. Makala 1 Preface For the last two years, Yala swamp controversy has been in the headlines in the Kenyan media. Although the controversy seem to have been in place for the last 50 years as concerns the infringement and displacement of humans by the papyrus, the ownership of the swamp and, the rehabilitation and development of the wetland, it took a new dimension in the year 2002. In this year Dominion Company from USA showed interest of developing the wetland for rice growing and put its proposal to the Kenyan Government. The Lake Basin Development Authority did the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). A perusal through the EIA report, proved the partiality of the study. The poverty level of the locals and the desperation for improved living standard may justify the bias. Immediately it became clear that Dominion was to rehabilitate the wetland, two county councils cum districts (Siaya and Bondo) started boundary tussles over the wetland. It was agreed that the two county councils share the land in question. To date, the inhabitants will show you different boundary points, each respondent impressing you of how the wetland is in their own district. This study was carried out when tension was high in the region, especially in both Bondo and Siaya Districts, where the activities of Dominion Group of Company will have direct impact. Initially most of the locals associated themselves with the developers as they hoped to benefit directly, largely through employment for themselves and their relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants of Papyrus Harvesting in the Yala Swamp, Kenya
    Determinants of Papyrus Harvesting in the Yala Swamp, Kenya S M Mwakubo, M M Ikiara Abstract: Using data from a 2005 field survey, this paper examines the factors that drive papyrus-harvesting pressure in the Yala wetlands. Descriptive statistics were used to understand the socio-economic characteristics of papyrus harvesters and the papyrus production process while a truncated Tobit model was employed to determine the factors influencing the amount of papyrus harvested. The findings show that the number of years one is involved in papyrus activities (proxy for experience), household size, sex of the harvester, and level of ammonia increase the intensity of papyrus harvesting. Non-papyrus income, grass roofed house, and wooden seats, however tend to reduce it. The policy implication emanating from this study hinges on self-regulation, alternative sources of livelihood, and family planning control as the way forward for sustainable utilization of papyrus. Key words: Kenya, Papyrus, sustainable utilization, and wetlands Introduction Wetland ecosystems are amongst the most threatened of all natural resources (Turner 1991: 59). In developing countries, the need to use natural resources wisely is greatest as biodiversity is higher in these regions and basic human needs are most acute. As for wetlands all over the world, papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) swamps in East Africa are under increasing threat (Crisman et al., 1996). These wetlands are degraded by unsustainable levels of resource extraction and structural modification. In Kenya, wetlands occupy about 3-4%, approximately 1400 kilometre square, of the land surface and up to 6% in the rainy season. The National Wetlands Standing Committee (NWSC) 1 has defined Kenyan wetlands as: “ areas of land that are permanently, seasonally or occasionally waterlogged with fresh, saline, brackish or marine waters at a depth not exceeding six metres, including both natural and man- made areas that support characteristic biota ”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Dominion Irrigation Project on Environmental Conservation in Yala Swamp, Siaya District, Kenya
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Impact Factor (2012): 3.358 The Effect of Dominion Irrigation Project on Environmental Conservation in Yala Swamp, Siaya District, Kenya Patricia Owiyo1, Bor, Erick Kiprono2, Paul Sutter3 1MA Egerton University, Facualty of Arts and Social Sciences, Njoro, Kenya Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, P.O. Box 536, Njoro, Nakuru 2Egerton University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Njoro, Kenya Department of Peace, Security and Social Studies, P.O. Box 536, Njoro, Nakuru 3Moi University, School of Arts and Social Studies, Eldoret, Kenya, Department of Sociology and Psychology P.O. Box 3900-30100, Eldoret Abstract: Wetlands are a main source of livelihoods for riparian and estuarine communities in Sub-Sahara Africa. For generations the riparian community of South Central Alego Location in Siaya County, Kenya depended on the Yala Swamp Wetland as their only source of household livelihoods. This natural resource base provided an arena for floodplain activities like livestock herding, farming, fishing, wood logging, hunting, papyrus harvesting and the cottage industry. However, in 2003 the local leaders in South Central Alego leased the Wetland to Dominion Group of Companies for the production of rice. The social exchange process heralded a major social change for the residents of Yala Swamp in terms of lifestyle and resource base. They rejected the change. This study was motivated by media reports of agitation from the residents – discontent arising from claims of takeover and transformation of the Wetland which, according to them, resulted in degradation of the environment and hence, loss of household livelihoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Resilience in East Africa Through Policy, Adaptation, Research, and Economic Development (Prepared)
    PLANNING FOR RESILIENCE IN EAST AFRICA THROUGH POLICY, ADAPTATION, RESEARCH, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (PREPARED) BALANCING DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION IN KENYA’S LARGEST FRESHWATER PAPYRUS WETLAND IN YALA SWAMP FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT AND LESSONS LEARNED August 2016 September 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development by Tetra Tech ARD through USAID/East Africa Contract AID-623-C-13- 00003. The report was prepared by Serah Munguti and submitted to Tetra Tech ARD as the final deliverable for the project: Balancing development and conservation in Kenya’s largest freshwater papyrus wetland in Yala Swamp. Tetra Tech ARD Contacts: John Parker Thomas McCann Senior Technical Advisor/Manager Project Manager Tetra Tech ARD Tetra Tech ARD Burlington, VT Burlington, Vermont Tel.: 802-658-3890 Tel.: 802-658-3890 [email protected] [email protected] PLANNING FOR RESILIENCE IN EAST AFRICA THROUGH POLICY, ADAPTATION, RESEARCH, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (PREPARED) BALANCING DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION IN KENYA’S LARGEST FRESHWATER PAPYRUS WETLAND IN YALA SWAMP FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT AND LESSONS LEARNED February 2017 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government Table of Contents 1 Executive summary ........................................................................................................ 1 2 Key achievements .......................................................................................................... 4 1. Inception and Work planning workshop .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity of the Yala Swamp Lakes, with Special Emphasis On
    Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 905–920, 2003. 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Biological diversity of the Yala Swamp lakes, with special emphasis on fish species composition, in relation to changes in the Lake Victoria Basin (Kenya): threats and conservation measures P.A. ALOO Department of Zoology, Kenyatta University, P.O. Box 43844, Nairobi, Kenya (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: 1254-2-4449902) Received 3 September 2001; accepted in revised form 15 May 2002 Key words: Biological diversity, Lake Victoria, Threats and conservation, Yala Swamp lakes Abstract. During the second half of the last century, the Lake Victoria ecosystem has undergone drastic ecological changes. Most notable has been the decline in the populations of many endemic cichlid fishes. The lake has lost nearly 200 haplochromines and one tilapiine, Oreochromis esculentus. The above changes have been attributed to effects of species stocking and, in particular, from predation pressure by the introduced Nile perch, Lates niloticus. Other factors that have led to the decline of the endemic species include intensive non-selective fishing, extreme changes in the drainage basin, increased eutrophication, and the invasion of the lake by the water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. However, the remnants of some species that had disappeared from Lake Victoria occur abundantly in the Yala Swamp lakes (Kanyaboli, Sare and Namboyo). This paper discusses the biodiversity of the swamp and the three lakes and gives suggestions for their conservation. Introduction Biological diversity is defined as: ‘‘the variability among living organisms from all sources including inter alia terrestrial, marine, freshwater, other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species and of ecosystems’’ (Gray 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dying National Wetland-Case Study of Yala Swamp Beyond 2020-KENYA
    The Dying National Wetland-Case Study of Yala Swamp Beyond 2020- KENYA John Voster, International Delegate, Kenya Yala Swamp lies within the equatorial line (zero degrees) with rich biodiversity. The Swamp covers an area of 175km2. Research findings in relations to property rights management, environmental stewardship and healthy ecosystems from case studies of Yala Swamp in Kenya are discussed. Yala Swamp is home and living museum to many fish species and wildlife. This fact is supported by reality that prior to the introduction of Nile perch in Lake Victoria for export market, the lake was once dominated by over 300 fish species and currently, Lake Victoria only supports three fisheries. The endemic species that were in Lake Victoria, it is only evident that Yala Swamp has lived to its restoration of native species which cannot be found anywhere within the catchments of Lake Victoria. The Swamp was once drained by government through UNDP and later on reclaimed by UNDP-GEF programme. Currently the Swamp has been leased to an American investor for the purpose of agricultural production without considering the die consequences. Within the project, a number of communities have been forced to sell their lands and homes for project takings to which conflict of interest has created a vacuum of land rights and ownership and the State involvement in leasing lands to foreign based developers without conducting EIA and the socio-economics of wetland reclamation. Negative impact is the involvement and leasing of National Heritage (wetland) coverage to Dominion Farm for the purpose of agricultural activities of which currently has threatened the integrity of wetland ecosystem health and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Darwin Initiative Final Report To be completed with reference to the Reporting Guidance Notes for Project Leaders (http://darwin.defra.gov.uk/resources/) it is expected that this report will be a maximum of 20 pages in length, excluding annexes) Darwin project information Project reference 21-015 Project title Balancing development and conservation in Kenya’s largest freshwater wetland-Yala Swamp Host country(ies) Kenya Contract holder institution Nature Kenya Partner institution(s) The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB),The Inter- ministerial Technical Committee for the sustainable management of Kenya Deltas (IMTC), Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS), National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), The Yala Wetland Environmental Volunteers (YAWEV)-now reconstituted to form Yala Ecosystem Site Support Group Darwin grant value £280,000 Start/end dates of project Start: April 2015 End: April 2017 Project leader’s name Serah Munguti Project www.naturekenya.org website/blog/Twitter Report author(s) and date Serah Munguti , Emily Mateche, 15th May 2017 Project Rationale Figure 1: Location of the Yala Swamp Figure 2: Map of the Yala Swamp complex The Yala swamp covers an area of 17,500 ha on the north-eastern shore of Lake Victoria. It is Kenya’s largest freshwater wetland, and is of great importance both for biodiversity and a stronghold for ecosystem services that support livelihoods. It is a key site for the nationally threatened semi-aquatic antelope Sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekeii) and other larger mammals; for numerous wetland birds, including the globally threatened Papyrus Yellow Warbler (Chloropeta gracilirostris); and for cichlid fish endemic to Lake Victoria, many of which have extirpated in the main lake by introduced Nile Perch.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Socio-Economic Value of the Wetlands Fisheries? the Case of Yala Wetland in Kenya
    What is the socio-economic value of the wetlands fisheries? The case of Yala Wetland in Kenya Item Type Proceedings Paper Authors Abila, R.O.; Othina, A. Citation Odada, Eric & Olago, Daniel O. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 11th World Lakes Conference: vol. 2. p. 178-185 Download date 26/09/2021 06:03:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/1493 What is the socio-economic value of the wetlands fisheries? The case of Yala Wetland in Kenya Abila, Richard O. and Andrew Othina Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, P.O. BOX 1881, Kisumu, Kenya Abstract particularly between the 'pro-development', mainly government officers who regard the swamp as a Wetlands in most parts of the world are under threat of potentially rich agricultural ground, and the over-exploitation partly because their socio-economic value is not well known. Yala Wetland, the largest fresh- 'environmentalists', who see the swamp as an water wetland in Kenya, with a large part of it bordering important ecosystem for various species of plants Lake Victoria’s shoreline, faces even greater threats of and animals (OSIENALA, 1998; Aloo, 2003). Some extinction. This wetland measures about 17,500 ha and is of these studies have further suggested that the host to a number of indigenous fish species, animals and reclaimed land could support commercial fish plants which are exploited by the local communities for production in fish ponds, and in cages in running subsistence and commercial purposes.There has been water channels, which they estimate could produce pressure to reclaim portions of this wetland for agricultural up to 60 MT of fish per year (JICA, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Yala Swamp, Western Kenya, East Africa
    Project ID 000397, Expedition number: EXP1009564 Project dates 1997 – 1998 Project Site: Yala swamp, Western Kenya, East Africa. Introduction This team from Maseno University won the wetlands category of the 1997 grants award. This project comprising of a group of undergraduates from Maseno University was led by a Kenyan lecturer from that institution who had prior experience conducting research on the Yala Swamp, a rare wetland ecosystem of western Kenya. This project was one of the pioneer ones to undertake an evaluation of the role the local community could play in the conservation and sustainable management of the wetland and to undertake a preliminary economic valuation of the wetland resources. The Yala swamp is one of the few extensive wetlands found in western Kenya. The wetland covers an area of 17,500 ha and contains three freshwater lakes, Kanyaboli, Sare, and Namboyo. The swamp vegetation is mainly papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) and Phragmites reeds. This wetland is nationally important in that it is one of the few habitats where the threatened Sitatunga antelope ( Tragelaphus spekeii) is found in Kenya. The associated lakes contain some critically endangered tilapiine and haplochromine cichlid fish species including Oreochromis esculentus and Xystichromis phytophagus, some of which are no longer found in Lake Victoria. Lake Kanyaboli has suffered as a consequence of land reclamation. In 1970, inflow into the lake from the Yala River, the lake’s only major inlet, was stopped, by the construction of a diversion canal, 8 km long, to convey the river water directly into Lake Victoria. At present the only inlets into the lake are through River Rapudo, a small stream flowing from the east and through some broken dykes.
    [Show full text]