DOCSLIB.ORG

Tax Crimes Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TAX CRIMES HANDBOOK Office of Chief Counsel Criminal Tax Division 2009 PREFACE The goal in developing this handbook was to provide a resource for Criminal Tax Attorneys to use in the course of advising their client on criminal tax matters, and in evaluating recommendations for prosecution. This handbook is not intended to create or confer any rights, privileges, or benefits on any person. It is not intended to have the force of law, or of a statement of Internal Revenue Service policy. See, United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741 (1979). _________/s/______________ EDWARD F. CRONIN Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Criminal Tax) Internal Revenue Service This Page is Blank – NO BORDER CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 1 TAX EVASION - I.R.C. § 7201 1-1.01 Statutory Language 2 1-1.02 Generally 2 1-1.03 Evasion of Assessment 4 [1] Elements of the Offense 4 [2] The Attempt 4 [3] Additional Tax Due and Owing 6 [4] Willfulness 9 [5] Venue 13 [6] Statute of Limitations 14 1-1.04 Evasion of Payment 15 [1] Elements of the Offense 15 [2] The Attempt 15 [3] Additional Tax Due and Owing 17 [4] Willfulness 17 [5] Venue 18 [6] Statute of Limitations 18 1-1.05 Collateral Estoppel 18 1-1.06 Lesser Included Offenses 19 1-1.07 Table of Cases 20 i CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 2 WILLFUL FAILURE TO COLLECT OR PAY OVER TAX I.R.C. § 7202 1-2.01 Statutory Language 30 1-2.02 Generally 30 1-2.03 Elements of the Offense 30 [1] Duty to Collect and/or to Truthfully Account for and Pay Over 31 [2] Failure to Collect or Truthfully Account for and Pay Over 31 [3] Willfulness 31 1-2.04 Motor Fuel Excise Tax Prosecutions 33 1-2.05 Venue 33 1-2.06 Statute of Limitations 33 1-2.07 Table of Cases 35 ii CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 3 FAILURE TO FILE, SUPPLY INFORMATION OR PAY TAX - I.R.C. § 7203 1-3.01 Statutory Language 38 1-3.02 Generally 39 1-3.03 Failure to Pay a Tax 39 1-3.04 Failure to File a Return 40 1-3.05 Failure to Keep Records 47 1-3.06 Failure to Supply Information 48 1-3.07 Venue 48 1-3.08 Statute of Limitations 49 1-3.09 Table of Cases 50 iii CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 4 FRAUDULENT WITHHOLDING EXEMPTION OR FAILURE TO SUPPLY INFORMATION - I.R.C. § 7205 1-4.01 Statutory Language 55 1-4.02 Generally 55 1-4.03 Section 7205(a) Offense 56 1-4.04 Section 7205(b) Offense 57 1-4.05 Venue 58 1-4.06 Statute of Limitations 58 1-4.07 Table of Cases 59 iv CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 5 FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS - I.R.C. § 7206 1-5.01 Statutory Language 62 1-5.02 Generally 63 1-5.03 § 7206(1) - Declaration under the Penalties of Perjury 64 [1] Elements of the Offense 64 [2] “Makes” (Files) any Return, Statement or Document 65 [3] Return, Statement or Other Document 65 [4] Signed Under Penalties of Perjury 66 [5] Did Not Believe the Document to be True and Correct 67 [6] Materiality 67 [7] Willfulness 70 1-5.04 § 7206(2) - Aiding or Assisting the Preparation of a False or Fraudulent Document 71 [1] Elements of the Offense 71 [2] Aiding and Assisting 72 [3] Return, Affidavit, Claim, or Other Document 73 [4] Materiality 74 [5] Willfulness 74 1-5.05 § 7206(4) - Removal or Concealment with Intent to Defraud 75 [1] Elements of the Offense 75 [2] Removes, Deposits, or Conceals 75 [3] Tax Imposed or Levy Authorized 76 v [4] Willfulness 76 1-5.06 § 7206(5) - Compromises and Closing Agreements 77 [1] Scope of section 7206(5) 77 [2] Willfulness 77 1-5.07 Venue 77 1-5.08 Statute of Limitations 78 1-5.09 Duplicity Considerations for Lesser Included Offenses 78 1-5.10 Table of Cases 80 vi CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 6 FRAUDULENT RETURNS, STATEMENTS, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS I.R.C. § 7207 1-6.01 Statutory Language 88 1-6.02 Elements of the Offense 88 1-6.03 Summary 88 1-6.04 Venue 89 1-6.05 Statute of Limitations 89 1-6.06 Table of Cases 90 vii CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX CRIMES SECTION 7 ATTEMPTS TO INTERFERE WITH ADMINISTRATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE LAWS - I.R.C. § 7212 1-7.01 Statutory Language 92 1-7.02 Corrupt or Forcible Interference - I.R.C. § 7212(a) 92 [1] Generally 92 [2] Corrupt or Forcible Interference - Offense No. 1 93 [3] Corrupt Endeavors to Impede - “Omnibus Clause” Offense No. 2 93 1-7.03 Forcible Rescue of Seized Property - I.R.C. § 7212(b) 96 [1] Elements of the Offense 96 [2] Summary 97 1-7.04 Venue 97 1-7.05 Statute of Limitations 97 1-7.06 Table of Cases 99 viii CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 1 AIDING AND ABETTING - 18 U.S.C. § 2 2-1.01 Statutory Language 102 2-1.02 Elements of the Offense 102 2-1.03 Summary 102 2-1.04 Venue 105 2-1.05 Statute of Limitations 105 2-1.06 Table of Cases 106 ix CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 2 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE GOVERNMENT WITH RESPECT TO CLAIMS - 18 U.S.C. § 286 2-2.01 Statutory Language 109 2-2.02 Elements of the Offense 109 2-2.03 Summary 109 2-2.04 Venue 110 2-2.05 Statute of Limitations 110 2-2.06 Table of Cases 111 x CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 3 FALSE, FICTITIOUS, OR FRAUDULENT CLAIMS 18 U.S.C. § 287 2-3.01 Statutory Language 113 2-3.02 Elements of the Offense 113 2-3.03 Summary 114 2-3.04 Venue 118 2-3.05 Statute of Limitations 119 2-3.06 Table of Cases 120 xi CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 4 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES - 18 U.S.C. § 371 2-4.01 Statutory Language 123 2-4.02 Generally 123 2-4.03 Elements of the Offense 124 2-4.04 Summary 125 [1] The Agreement 125 [2] Parties to the Conspiracy 126 [3] Nexus Required: Parties and the Agreement 128 [4] Overt Act 128 [5] Intent 130 [6] Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States 131 [7] Conspiracy to Defraud the United States 132 [8] Conspiracy to Impede, Obstruct or Impair the I.R.S. -Klein Conspiracy 133 [9] Duration of the Conspiracy 136 2-4.05 Venue 137 2-4.06 Statute of Limitations 137 2-4.07 Use of § 371: Evidentiary Considerations 138 2-4.08 Table of Cases 141 xii CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 5 FICTIOUS OBLIGATIONS - 18 U.S.C. § 514 2-5.01 Statutory Language 151 2-5.02 Elements of the Offense 151 2-5.03 Summary 151 2-5.04 Venue 153 2-5.05 Statue of Limitations 153 2-5.06 Table of Cases 154 xiii CHAPTER 2 RELATED TITLE 18 OFFENSES SECTION 6 IDENTITY THEFT - 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7) 2-6.01 Statutory Language 156 2-6.02 Elements of the Offense 156 2-6.03 Summary 156 [1] Means of Identification Documents 157 [2] Intent 157 [3] Interstate or Foreign Commerce 157 2-6.04 Venue 158 2-6.05 Statue of Limitations 158 2-6.06 Table of Cases 159 xiv CHAPTER 1 TITLE 26 TAX VIOLATIONS SECTION 1 TAX EVASION - I.R.C. § 7201 1-1.01 Statutory Language 2 1-1.02 Generally 2 1-1.03 Evasion of Assessment 4 [1] Elements of the Offense 4 [2] The Attempt 4 [3] Additional Tax Due and Owing 6 [4] Willfulness 9 [5] Venue 13 [6] Statute of Limitations 14 1-1.04 Evasion of Payment 15 [1] Elements of the Offense 15 [2] The Attempt 15 [3] Additional Tax Due and Owing 17 [4] Willfulness 17 [5] Venue 18 [6] Statute of Limitations 18 1-1.05 Collateral Estoppel 18 1-1.06 Lesser Included Offenses 19 1-1.07 Table of Cases 20 1-1.01 Statutory Language I.R.C. § 7201 - ATTEMPT TO EVADE OR DEFEAT TAX Any person who willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any tax imposed by this title or the payment thereof shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined* not more than $100,000 ($500,000 in the case of a corporation), or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution. * As to offenses committed after December 31, 1984, the Criminal Fine Enforcement Act of 1984 (P.L. 92-596) enacted as 18 U.S.C. § 3571, increased the maximum permissible fines for felony offenses set forth in section 7201. The maximum permissible fine is $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for corporations. 1-1.02 Generally [1] Two kinds of tax evasion. Section 7201 creates two offenses: (a) the willful attempt to evade or defeat the assessment of a tax, and (b) the willful attempt to evade or defeat the payment of a tax. Sansone v. United States, 380 U.S. 343, 354 (1965).
Recommended publications
  • Engagement Guidance on Corporate Tax Responsibility Why and How to Engage with Your Investee Companies

    Engagement Guidance on Corporate Tax Responsibility Why and How to Engage with Your Investee Companies

    ENGAGEMENT GUIDANCE ON CORPORATE TAX RESPONSIBILITY WHY AND HOW TO ENGAGE WITH YOUR INVESTEE COMPANIES An investor initiative in partnership with UNEP Finance Initiative and UN Global Compact THE SIX PRINCIPLES We will incorporate ESG issues into investment analysis and 1 decision-making processes. We will be active owners and incorporate ESG issues into our 2 ownership policies and practices. We will seek appropriate disclosure on ESG issues by 3 the entities in which we invest. We will promote acceptance and implementation of the Principles 4 within the investment industry. We will work together to enhance our effectiveness in 5 implementing the Principles. We will each report on our activities and progress towards 6 implementing the Principles. CREDITS & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Athanasia Karananou and Anastasia Guha, PRI Editor: Mark Kolmar, PRI Design: Alessandro Boaretto, PRI The PRI is grateful to the investor taskforce on corporate tax responsibility for their contributions to the guidance: ■ Harriet Parker, Investment Analyst, Alliance Trust Investments ■ Steven Bryce, Investment Analyst, Arisaig Partners (Asia) Pte Ltd ■ Francois Meloche, Extra Financial Risks Manager, Bâtirente ■ Adam Kanzer, Managing Director, Domini Social Investments LLC ■ Pauline Lejay, SRI Officer, ERAFP ■ Meryam Omi, Head of Sustainability, Legal & General Investment Management ■ Robert Wilson, Research Analyst, MFS Investment Management ■ Michelle de Cordova, Director, Corporate Engagement & Public Policy, NEI Investments ■ Rosa van den Beemt, ESG Analyst, NEI Investments ■ Kate Elliot, Ethical Researcher, Rathbone Brothers Plc ■ Matthias Müller, Senior SI Analyst, RobecoSAM ■ Rosl Veltmeijer, Head of Research, Triodos Investment Management We would like to warmly thank Sol Picciotto, Emeritus Professor, Lancaster University and Coordinator, BEPS Monitoring Group, and Katherine Ng, PRI, for their contribution to the guidance.
  • Oc Undeliverable Refunds Final.Pdf

    Oc Undeliverable Refunds Final.Pdf

    Sample article for organizations to use to reach customers (288 word count) Customize and post the following article on your websites and/or other communication vehicles to help your customers who may be looking for their federal tax refund. _____________________________________________________________________________________ The IRS may have a refund check waiting for you Thousands of tax refund checks go undelivered every year because people forget to tell the IRS or post office that their address changed. This year, more than 99,000 people are due refund checks averaging $1,547. Could one of them be you? If you think your refund check may have been returned to the IRS as undelivered, you should use the Where’s My Refund? tool on IRS.gov. This tool provides the status of your refund and, in some cases, instructions on how to resolve delivery problems. You can put an end to lost, stolen or undelivered checks by choosing direct deposit when you file either paper or electronic returns. Last year, more than 78.4 million people chose to receive their refund through direct deposit. You can receive refunds directly into your bank account, split a tax refund into two or three financial accounts or even buy a savings bond. You can also file your tax return electronically. E-file eliminates the risk of lost paper returns, reduces errors on tax returns and speeds up refunds. Nearly 8 out of 10 taxpayers chose e-file last year. E-file combined with direct deposit is the best option for avoiding refund problems. Plus, it’s easy, fast and safe.
  • Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age

    Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age

    Tulsa Law Review Volume 44 Issue 4 The Scholarship of Richard A. Epstein Summer 2009 Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age Catherine M. Sharkey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Catherine M. Sharkey, Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age, 44 Tulsa L. Rev. 677 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol44/iss4/2 This Legal Scholarship Symposia Articles is brought to you for free and open access by TU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tulsa Law Review by an authorized editor of TU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sharkey: Trespass Torts and Self-Help for an Electronic Age TRESPASS TORTS AND SELF-HELP FOR AN ELECTRONIC AGE Catherine M. Sharkey* INTRODU CTION ................................................................................................................ 678 1. SELF-HELP: THE MISSING THIRD REMEDY .......................................................... 679 II. CONCEPTUALIZING SELF-HELP IN CYBERTRESPASS DOCTRINE ........................... 684 A. Self-Help in Plaintiff's Prima Facie Case ................................................... 684 1. Threshold Prerequisite to Invoke Legal Process ................................... 684 2. Liability for Evasion of Self-Help ........................................................ 687 B. Self-Help "Opt-Out" as Affirmative Defense ............................................
  • Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries

    Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries

    Creating Market Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries Creating Incentives for Greener Products Policy Manual for Eastern Partnership Countries 2014 About the OECD The OECD is a unique forum where governments work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Union takes part in the work of the OECD. Since the 1990s, the OECD Task Force for the Implementation of the Environmental Action Programme (the EAP Task Force) has been supporting countries of Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia to reconcile their environment and economic goals. About the EaP GREEN programme The “Greening Economies in the European Union’s Eastern Neighbourhood” (EaP GREEN) programme aims to support the six Eastern Partnership countries to move towards green economy by decoupling economic growth from environmental degradation and resource depletion. The six EaP countries are: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine.
  • Form IT-399:2020:New York Depreciation Schedule:It399

    Form IT-399:2020:New York Depreciation Schedule:It399

    Department of Taxation and Finance New York State Depreciation Schedule IT-399 Name(s) as shown on return Identifying number as shown on return Mark an X in one box to show the income tax return you are filing and submit this form with that return. IT-201, Resident IT-203, Nonresident and part-year resident IT-204, Partnership IT-205, Fiduciary Part 1 – Depreciation information for property (except for Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 280F property) placed in service inside or outside New York State in tax years beginning after December 31, 1980, but before January 1, 1985, and if you elect to continue using IRC section 167 depreciation for property placed in service outside New York State in tax years beginning after December 31, 1984, but before January 1, 1994 (see instructions) A B C D E F G Description of property Date placed Depreciable Depr. Life or New York Federal ACRS (submit schedule if needed) in service basis method rate depreciation deduction (mmddyyyy) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1 Enter column F and column G totals ................................................................ 1 .00 .00 Transfer the column F total to: Transfer the column G total to: Form IT-225, line 10, Total amount column and enter Form IT-225, line 1, Total amount column and enter subtraction modification S-210 in the Number column. addition modification A-205 in the Number column. Estates and trusts: If the amount computed is attributable to items reflected in the federal distributable net income, transfer the amounts as stated above. If the amount is not reflected in federal distributable net income, see instructions.
  • Transfer Pricing As a Vehicle in Corporate Tax Avoidance

    Transfer Pricing As a Vehicle in Corporate Tax Avoidance

    The Journal of Applied Business Research – January/February 2017 Volume 33, Number 1 Transfer Pricing As A Vehicle In Corporate Tax Avoidance Joel Barker, Borough of Manhattan Community College, USA Kwadwo Asare, Bryant University, USA Sharon Brickman, Borough of Manhattan Community College, USA ABSTRACT Using transfer pricing, U.S. Corporations are able to transfer revenues to foreign affiliates with lower corporate tax rates. The Internal Revenue Code requires intercompany transactions to comply with the “Arm’s Length Principle” in order to prevent tax avoidance. We describe and use elaborate examples to explain how U.S. companies exploit flexibility in the tax code to employ transfer pricing and related tax reduction and avoidance methods. We discuss recent responses by regulatory bodies. Keywords: Transfer Pricing; Tax avoidance; Inversion; Tax Evasion; Arm’s Length Principle; R & D for Intangible Assets; Cost Sharing Agreements; Double Irish; Profit Shifting INTRODUCTION ver the last decade U.S. corporations have been increasing their use of Corporate Inversions. In an inversion, corporations move their domestic corporations to foreign jurisdictions in order to be eligible O for much lower corporate tax rates. Furthermore, inversions allow U.S. corporations that have accumulated billions of dollars overseas through transfer pricing to access those funds tax free. With an inversion a U.S. corporation becomes a foreign corporation and would not have to pay tax to the U.S. government to access the funds accumulated abroad as the funds no longer have to be repatriated to be spent. Corporations continue to avoid taxation through Transfer Pricing. This article explains transfer pricing and discusses some of the tax issues that transfer pricing pose including recommendations and proposed legislation to mitigate the practice.
  • Alternative Approaches to Designing Financial Incentives

    Alternative Approaches to Designing Financial Incentives

    OECD PROJECT ON FINANCIAL INCENTIVES AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS POLICY BRIEF N°3 DECEMBER 2018 Alternative approaches to designing financial incentives The most common type of financial incentive savings are taxed upon withdrawal. In contrast, used by governments to promote savings for individuals would be better-off paying taxes retirement, is to defer taxation by taxing upfront when they expect tax rates during individuals only on their pension benefits retirement will be greater than when they are (“EET”). Governments are alternatively using working. other approaches to providing financial In the long run, upfront taxation may translate incentives, either through the tax system (e.g. into a higher fiscal cost than taxation upon upfront taxation or tax credits) or outside the tax withdrawal. Figure 2 compares the yearly fiscal system (e.g. matching contributions and fixed effects of the two tax regimes. It shows that, in nominal subsidies). the short term, upfront taxation leads to a lower Taxing retirement savings upfront or upon fiscal cost than taxation upon withdrawal. Taxing withdrawal only withdrawals and thus deferring tax collection, brings the full cost of tax revenues Taxing retirement savings upfront (i.e. taxing forgone on contributions upfront. With upfront only contributions, “TEE”) is often seen as an taxation, the fiscal cost is just equal to tax equivalent approach to taxing retirement savings revenues forgone on returns. In the long term, upon withdrawal (“EET”). Both tax regimes do once the two systems reach maturity, the fiscal indeed provide the same overall tax advantage to impact is reversed with taxation upon withdrawal individuals when their income is subject to the leading to a lower annual fiscal cost than upfront same marginal tax rate throughout working and taxation.
  • Evaluation of Environmental Tax Reforms: International Experiences

    Evaluation of Environmental Tax Reforms: International Experiences

    EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TAX REFORMS: INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES Final Report Prepared by: Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) 55 Quai au Foin 1000 Brussels Belgium 21 June 2013 Disclaimer: The arguments expressed in this report are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinion of any other party. This report should be cited as follows: Withana, S., ten Brink, P., Kretschmer, B., Mazza, L., Hjerp, P., Sauter, R., (2013) Evaluation of environmental tax reforms: International experiences , A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) for the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) and the Federal Finance Administration (FFA) of Switzerland. Final Report. Brussels. 2013. Citation for report annexes: Withana, S., ten Brink, P., Kretschmer, B., Mazza, L., Hjerp, P., Sauter, R., Malou, A., and Illes, A., (2013) Annexes to Final Report - Evaluation of environmental tax reforms: International experiences . A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) for the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) and the Federal Finance Administration (FFA) of Switzerland. Brussels. 2013. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the following for their contributions to the study: Kai Schlegelmilch (Green Budget Europe); Stefan Speck (European Environment Agency - EEA); Herman Vollebergh (PBL – Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency); Hans Vos (Independent); Mikael Skou Andersen (European Environment Agency – EEA); Frank Convery (University College Dublin); Aldo Ravazzi (Ministry of Environment, Italy); Vladislav Rezek (Ministry of Finance, Czech Republic); Frans Oosterhuis (Institute for Environmental Studies - Vrije Universiteit - IVM); Constanze Adolf (Green Budget Europe); and Janne Stene (Bellona). The authors would also like to thank the members of the Working Group accompanying the study: Carsten Colombier (Leiter) (EFV); Marianne Abt (SECO); Fabian Mahnig (EDA MAHFA); Nicole Mathys (BFE); Reto Stroh (EZV); Michel Tschirren (BAFU); and Martina Zahno (EFV).
  • Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Certificate

    Form W-4, Employee's Withholding Certificate

    Employee’s Withholding Certificate OMB No. 1545-0074 Form W-4 ▶ (Rev. December 2020) Complete Form W-4 so that your employer can withhold the correct federal income tax from your pay. ▶ Department of the Treasury Give Form W-4 to your employer. 2021 Internal Revenue Service ▶ Your withholding is subject to review by the IRS. Step 1: (a) First name and middle initial Last name (b) Social security number Enter Address ▶ Does your name match the Personal name on your social security card? If not, to ensure you get Information City or town, state, and ZIP code credit for your earnings, contact SSA at 800-772-1213 or go to www.ssa.gov. (c) Single or Married filing separately Married filing jointly or Qualifying widow(er) Head of household (Check only if you’re unmarried and pay more than half the costs of keeping up a home for yourself and a qualifying individual.) Complete Steps 2–4 ONLY if they apply to you; otherwise, skip to Step 5. See page 2 for more information on each step, who can claim exemption from withholding, when to use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App, and privacy. Step 2: Complete this step if you (1) hold more than one job at a time, or (2) are married filing jointly and your spouse Multiple Jobs also works. The correct amount of withholding depends on income earned from all of these jobs. or Spouse Do only one of the following. Works (a) Use the estimator at www.irs.gov/W4App for most accurate withholding for this step (and Steps 3–4); or (b) Use the Multiple Jobs Worksheet on page 3 and enter the result in Step 4(c) below for roughly accurate withholding; or (c) If there are only two jobs total, you may check this box.
  • Scmf-11-0000315 in the Supreme Court of the State

    Scmf-11-0000315 in the Supreme Court of the State

    SCMF-11-0000315 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I In the Matter of the Publication and Distribution of the Hawai#i Pattern Jury Instructions - Criminal ORDER APPROVING PUBLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF HAWAI#I PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CRIMINAL (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Upon consideration of the request of the Standing Committee on Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions to publish and distribute the revision of Criminal Instructions 6.01, 7.5, 10.00A(3), 10.05A, 10.05C, 10.07, 10.07A, 10.09, and 10.09A of the Hawai#i Pattern Jury Instructions - Criminal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request is granted as to the revisions proposed to Criminal Instructions 6.01, 7.5, and 10.00A(3), as amended in this order. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this approval for publication and distribution is not and shall not be considered by this court or any other court to be an approval or judgment as to the validity or correctness of the substance of any instruction. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 5, 2017. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson 2 6.01 ACCOMPLICE A defendant charged with committing an offense may be guilty because he/she is an accomplice of another person in the commission of the offense. The prosecution must prove accomplice liability beyond a reasonable doubt. A person is an accomplice of another in the commission of an offense if: 1. With the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense, he/she a.
  • The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy

    The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy

    California Law Review VOL. 61 SEPTEMBER 1973 No. 5 The Unnecessary Crime of Conspiracy Phillip E. Johnson* The literature on the subject of criminal conspiracy reflects a sort of rough consensus. Conspiracy, it is generally said, is a necessary doctrine in some respects, but also one that is overbroad and invites abuse. Conspiracy has been thought to be necessary for one or both of two reasons. First, it is said that a separate offense of conspiracy is useful to supplement the generally restrictive law of attempts. Plot- ters who are arrested before they can carry out their dangerous schemes may be convicted of conspiracy even though they did not go far enough towards completion of their criminal plan to be guilty of attempt.' Second, conspiracy is said to be a vital legal weapon in the prosecu- tion of "organized crime," however defined.' As Mr. Justice Jackson put it, "the basic conspiracy principle has some place in modem crimi- nal law, because to unite, back of a criniinal purpose, the strength, op- Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley. A.B., Harvard Uni- versity, 1961; J.D., University of Chicago, 1965. 1. The most cogent statement of this point is in Note, 14 U. OF TORONTO FACULTY OF LAW REv. 56, 61-62 (1956): "Since we are fettered by an unrealistic law of criminal attempts, overbalanced in favour of external acts, awaiting the lit match or the cocked and aimed pistol, the law of criminal conspiracy has been em- ployed to fill the gap." See also MODEL PENAL CODE § 5.03, Comment at 96-97 (Tent.
  • Form 309 Instructions

    Form 309 Instructions

    Arizona Form 2018 Credit for Taxes Paid to Another State or Country 309 For information or help, call one of the numbers listed: those taxes that qualify for a credit under Internal Phoenix (602) 255-3381 Revenue Code (IRC) §§ 901 and 903. From area codes 520 and 928, toll-free (800) 352-4090 NOTE: To claim a credit for taxes paid to a foreign country, Tax forms, instructions, and other tax information you must complete Form 309. You must complete Form 309 If you need tax forms, instructions, and other tax information, even if you did not have to complete federal Form 1116 to go to the department’s website at www.azdor.gov. claim a credit on your federal return. Income Tax Procedures and Rulings You may not claim this credit for the following: These instructions may refer to the department’s income tax • income taxes paid to any city or county, and procedures and rulings for more information. To view or print • interest or penalties paid to another state or country. these, go to our website and click on Reports and Legal NOTE: If you file an amended return after you claim this Research then click on Legal Research and select a document and category type from the drop down menus. credit, be sure to recalculate the credit, if required. Publications Application of Credit To view or print the department’s publications, go to our Claim this credit only if the income was subject to tax in both website and click on Reports and Legal Research then click Arizona and the other state or country in the same tax year.