The Magazine: August 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Vol. 3 No. 1.1 ______January 2006
Vol. 3 No. 1.1 _____ ________________________________ _ __ January 2006 th Return to the Cow Pens! 225 Backyard Archaeology – ARCHH Up! The Archaeological Reconnaissance and Computerization of Hobkirk’s Hill (ARCHH) project has begun initial field operations on this built-over, urban battlefield in Camden, South Carolina. We are using the professional-amateur cooperative archaeology model, loosely based upon the successful BRAVO organization of New Jersey. We have identified an initial survey area and will only test properties within this initial survey area until we demonstrate artifact recoveries to any boundary. Metal detectorist director John Allison believes that this is at least two years' work. Since the battlefield is in well-landscaped yards and there are dozens of homeowners, we are only surveying areas with landowner permission and we will not be able to cover 100% of the land in the survey area. We have a neighborhood meeting planned to explain the archaeological survey project to the landowners. SCAR will provide project handouts and offer a walking battlefield tour for William T. Ranney’s masterpiece, painted in 1845, showing Hobkirk Hill neighbors and anyone else who wants to attend on the final cavalry hand-to-hand combat at Cowpens, hangs Sunday, January 29, 2006 at 3 pm. [Continued on p. 17.] in the South Carolina State House lobby. Most modern living historians believe that Ranney depicted the uniforms quite inaccurately. Lt. Col. Banastre Tarleton’s British Legion cavalry is thought to have been clothed in green tunics and Lt. Col. William Washington’s cavalry in white. The story of Washington’s trumpeter or waiter [Ball, Collin, Collins] shooting a legionnaire just in time as Washington’s sword broke is also not well substantiated or that he was a black youth as depicted. -
Richatd Henry Lee 0Az-1Ts4l Although He Is Not Considered the Father of Our Country, Richard Henry Lee in Many Respects Was a Chief Architect of It
rl Name Class Date , BTocRAPHY Acrtvrry 2 Richatd Henry Lee 0az-1ts4l Although he is not considered the father of our country, Richard Henry Lee in many respects was a chief architect of it. As a member of the Continental Congress, Lee introduced a resolution stating that "These United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States." Lee's resolution led the Congress to commission the Declaration of Independence and forever shaped U.S. history. Lee was born to a wealthy family in Virginia and educated at one of the finest schools in England. Following his return to America, Lee served as a justice of the peace for Westmoreland County, Virginia, in 1757. The following year, he entered Virginia's House of Burgesses. Richard Henry Lee For much of that time, however, Lee was a quiet and almost indifferent member of political connections with Britain be Virginia's state legislature. That changed "totaIIy dissolved." The second called in 1765, when Lee joined Patrick Henry for creating ties with foreign countries. in a spirited debate opposing the Stamp The third resolution called for forming a c Act. Lee also spoke out against the confederation of American colonies. John .o c Townshend Acts and worked establish o to Adams, a deiegate from Massachusetts, o- E committees of correspondence that seconded Lee's resolution. A Declaration o U supported cooperation between American of Independence was quickly drafted. =3 colonies. 6 Loyalty to Uirginia An Active Patriot Despite his support for the o colonies' F When tensions with Britain increased, separation from Britain, Lee cautioned ! o the colonies organized the Continental against a strong national government. -
The Virginia Historical Register, and Literary Companion
REYNOLDS HISTORICAC GENEALOGY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 01763 2602 GENEALOGY 975.5 V8191B 1853 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center http://www.archive.org/details/virginiahistoric1853maxw THE VIRGIMIA HISTO RICAL REGISTER ] /fSS AND LITERARY COMPAJilON. EDITED BY WILLIAM MAXWELL, /. «^ VOL. VI. FOR THE YEAR 1853.^ RICHMOXD: • PRINTED FOR THE PROPRIETOR, BY jiACfAEiAyrVrEkiSbto', T ' 185cj CONTENTS OF VOLUME YI. NO. I. 1. Bridge, - - 1 The Battle of the Great j 2. Captain Cunningham, - - - 6 | 3' Smyth's Travels in Virginia, - - ^^1 4. The Virginia Gazette— Gazetteiana, No. 1, - 20 | 5. Tiiomas Randolph, - - - - 32 | C. Original Letter : from Gen'l Washington to Governor | Harrison, - - - - - ^"^ f 7. Architecture in - » - Virginia, 37 | 8. Stove - - - '42 The Old Again, . 9. The Late Miss Berry, - - - 45 I 10. INIenioirs of a Huguenot Family, - 45> 3 li. Various Intelligence: —The Sixth Annual INIeeting of | the Virginia Historical Late Daniel Society—The | Webster—A Curious Relic—The Air Ship— Gait's | - Pysche Again. - - - 49 I 12. Miscellany :—Lines on Gait's Psyche—The Study of | Nature—An Old Repartee Done into Rhyme. - 59 I NO. IL I 1. The Capture of Vincennes, - - 61 | 2. Smyth's Travels in Virginia, in 1773, &c. - 77 3. Gazetteiana, No. 2, - - - 91 I 4. Wither's Lines to Captaine Smith, - 101 I 5. Turkoy L-land, - - - 103 6. Old Trees, - - - 106 ? 7. Lossing's Pictorial Field Book of the Revolution, 108 I 8. Various Intelligence : — Mineral Wealth of Virginia— | The New Cabinet— the Medical College— RaifRoads in Virginia —The Caloric Inventior. -
Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67 -
Patrick Henry
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY PATRICK HENRY: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HARMONIZED RELIGIOUS TENSIONS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE HISTORY DEPARTMENT IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY BY KATIE MARGUERITE KITCHENS LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA APRIL 1, 2010 Patrick Henry: The Significance of Harmonized Religious Tensions By Katie Marguerite Kitchens, MA Liberty University, 2010 SUPERVISOR: Samuel Smith This study explores the complex religious influences shaping Patrick Henry’s belief system. It is common knowledge that he was an Anglican, yet friendly and cooperative with Virginia Presbyterians. However, historians have yet to go beyond those general categories to the specific strains of Presbyterianism and Anglicanism which Henry uniquely harmonized into a unified belief system. Henry displayed a moderate, Latitudinarian, type of Anglicanism. Unlike many other Founders, his experiences with a specific strain of Presbyterianism confirmed and cooperated with these Anglican commitments. His Presbyterian influences could also be described as moderate, and latitudinarian in a more general sense. These religious strains worked to build a distinct religious outlook characterized by a respect for legitimate authority, whether civil, social, or religious. This study goes further to show the relevance of this distinct religious outlook for understanding Henry’s political stances. Henry’s sometimes seemingly erratic political principles cannot be understood in isolation from the wider context of his religious background. Uniquely harmonized -
Henry Clinton Papers, Volume Descriptions
Henry Clinton Papers William L. Clements Library Volume Descriptions The University of Michigan Finding Aid: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/clementsead/umich-wcl-M-42cli?view=text Major Themes and Events in the Volumes of the Chronological Series of the Henry Clinton papers Volume 1 1736-1763 • Death of George Clinton and distribution of estate • Henry Clinton's property in North America • Clinton's account of his actions in Seven Years War including his wounding at the Battle of Friedberg Volume 2 1764-1766 • Dispersal of George Clinton estate • Mary Dunckerley's account of bearing Thomas Dunckerley, illegitimate child of King George II • Clinton promoted to colonel of 12th Regiment of Foot • Matters concerning 12th Regiment of Foot Volume 3 January 1-July 23, 1767 • Clinton's marriage to Harriet Carter • Matters concerning 12th Regiment of Foot • Clinton's property in North America Volume 4 August 14, 1767-[1767] • Matters concerning 12th Regiment of Foot • Relations between British and Cherokee Indians • Death of Anne (Carle) Clinton and distribution of her estate Volume 5 January 3, 1768-[1768] • Matters concerning 12th Regiment of Foot • Clinton discusses military tactics • Finances of Mary (Clinton) Willes, sister of Henry Clinton Volume 6 January 3, 1768-[1769] • Birth of Augusta Clinton • Henry Clinton's finances and property in North America Volume 7 January 9, 1770-[1771] • Matters concerning the 12th Regiment of Foot • Inventory of Clinton's possessions • William Henry Clinton born • Inspection of ports Volume 8 January 9, 1772-May -
The Frontiers of American Grand Strategy: Settlers, Elites, and the Standing Army in America’S Indian Wars
THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government By Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Washington, D.C. August 11, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Andrew Alden Szarejko All Rights Reserved ii THE FRONTIERS OF AMERICAN GRAND STRATEGY: SETTLERS, ELITES, AND THE STANDING ARMY IN AMERICA’S INDIAN WARS Andrew Alden Szarejko, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew O. Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Much work on U.S. grand strategy focuses on the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. If the United States did have a grand strategy before that, IR scholars often pay little attention to it, and when they do, they rarely agree on how best to characterize it. I show that federal political elites generally wanted to expand the territorial reach of the United States and its relative power, but they sought to expand while avoiding war with European powers and Native nations alike. I focus on U.S. wars with Native nations to show how domestic conditions created a disjuncture between the principles and practice of this grand strategy. Indeed, in many of America’s so- called Indian Wars, U.S. settlers were the ones to initiate conflict, and they eventually brought federal officials into wars that the elites would have preferred to avoid. I develop an explanation for settler success and failure in doing so. I focus on the ways that settlers’ two faits accomplis— the act of settling on disputed territory without authorization and the act of initiating violent conflict with Native nations—affected federal decision-making by putting pressure on speculators and local elites to lobby federal officials for military intervention, by causing federal officials to fear that settlers would create their own states or ally with foreign powers, and by eroding the credibility of U.S. -
Hunt Club 23
Charles City County Business Directory County Guide Compiled September 1998 By: Charles City County Department of Planning January 2016 **Please contact the Department of Planning to report any incorrect information** Introduction Charles City County is a quiet, rural haven located in the east-central portion of the Commonwealth of Virginia. In 1634, the colonial General Assembly met at Jamestown and divided the Virginia Colony into eight shires, similar to those in England. These were Accomack, Charles River, Henrico, Elizabeth City, James City, Warwick River, Warrosquyoake and Charles City. The Charles City shire was named for the English King's son, Charles, who later became King Charles I. When first established, Charles City comprised a large area on both sides of the James River, but gradually it lost land area to the formation of other counties. Settlement in Charles City County began as early as 1613. Many of the famous estates were patented in these early years. Charles Carter built Shirley Plantation about 1769. It is believed to be the first Virginia plantation. Today the Carter family still owns Shirley Plantation. Benjamin Harrison, IV, built the Berkeley Plantation mansion in 1726. Berkeley was the birthplace of Benjamin Harrison, V, a signer of the Declaration of Independence and Governor of Virginia. Berkeley was also the home of William Henry Harrison, the ninth President of the United States. John Tyler, tenth President of the United States, purchased Sherwood Forest in 1842. William Byrd, III, a notable Virginia planter, author, and colonial official constructed Westover Plantation about 1730. Evelynton Plantation was originally part of William Byrd's expansive Westover Plantation. -
GIPE-002571-Contents.Pdf
2- 5 71 AcN. 25t"JJ SERVANTS OF INDIA SOCIETY'S LIBRARY PUNE 411004 . FOR INTERNAL CIRCULATION To be returned on or before the last date stamped below. 1 7 ~tr 1982 THE STORY OF TH"E REVOLUTION 'hananjayarao Gadgil Library Illn~ IIIIIIIIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIRIIID GlPE-PUNE-002571 GEORGE WASHINGTON.' TAu ~t"dl is .""." u 1114 II Gilb-CII(I"";''I' ItJrffniJ." It ftI(I'.t ~(li.",t~ .... I7tJS 0> G.11;w1 SlIMrt. ttnUl u ,...., .... ~ Mr. S. P. Awry. 0' 'lll1It»t AiHd :/Wmti(suni it is MTe ".~,rod"cetl. THE STORY Cltf· AMERICAN REVOLUTION BY HENRY CABOT LODGE WITH ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY ILLUSTRATIONS LONDON DUe K W 0 R T H & co. 190 3 COPYRIGHT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1898, 1903, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS Printed by Sherman & Co. Philadelphia, U. S. A. V7 II SI- L8 TO THE ARMY AND NAVY OF THE UNITED STATES, VICTORS OF MANILA, SANTIAGO AND. PORTO RICO, WORTHY SUCCESSORS OF THE SOLDIERS AND SAILORS WHO UNDER THE LEAD OF GEORGE WASHINGTON WON AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE, THIS STORY O}O' THE REVOLUTION IS DEDICATED. CONTENTS CHAPTER I. PAGK THE FIRST STEP. I CHAPTER II. THE FIRST BLOW 25 CHAPTER III. THE SECOND CONGRESS • 53 CHAPTER IV. THE REPLY TO LORD SANDWICH CHAPTER V. THE SIEGE OF BOSTON 97 CHAPTER VI. THE SPREAD OF REVOLUTION • 118 CHAPTER VII. INDEPENDENCE • 136 CHAPTER VIII. THE FIGHT FOR THE HUDSON • 180 v vi CONTENTS CHAPTER IX. PAGR TRENTON AND PRINCETON • 202 CHAPTER X. THE BURGOYNE CAMPAIGN 228 CHAPTER XI. THE RESULTS OF SARATOGA 263 CHAPTER XII. -
Patrick Henry's Integrity Patrick Henry Was Born in Virginia in 1736 When Virginia Was Still a British Colony
Patrick Henry's Integrity Patrick Henry was born in Virginia in 1736 when Virginia was still a British colony. He became a lawyer when he was 24 years old and quickly became well known for his eloquent work in the legal case known as the Parsons' Cause. This case was significant because it argued whether the colonial government or the British crown should make financial decisions for the colonies. About five years before, the Two Penny Act restricted the pay of ministers of the Anglican church (parsons) during a drought year in which the price of tobacco jumped higher (high demand, low supply). Parsons were paid in those days with tobacco, which had a value of about 2 cents a pound. The Two Penny Act of Virginia, enacted by the colonial government [that is, Virginia's government, not England's], maintained that parsons continue to earn 2 cents despite the higher price of tobacco. The parsons protested this because they believed they should benefit from the increased value of tobacco. The parsons appealed to authorities in England, who overruled [set aside, didn't enforce] the Two Penny Act. This judgment by England angered colonialists who believed England had no right to interfere in the colony's financial decision making. Although the Two Penny Act lasted only a year, some parsons sued for back wages. Patrick Henry argued in the case against one parson for the state's right to make its own laws. Although the parson won the case, he was awarded only a penny in back pay. Henry’s success launched a new recognition of his skills. -
General Wayne Marches South, 1781
GENERAL WAYNE MARCHES SOUTH, 1781 By GEORGE W. KYTE* M UCH of the fighting in the War for American Independence was done by militia. The militia usually enlisted for terms of ninety days, and they generally fought within the boundaries of their own states. When occasionally they did fight beyond those boundaries, their short enlistments made it difficult for them to operate far afield. Congress needed, in the circumstances, troops who could fight anywhere they were required and whose terms of enlistment were such that they could remain in the field through- out a campaign. Such troops came to be provided by each state and were called, appropriately enough, Continentals. There was still heavy reliance upon militia for home defense after Continental regiments had been formed, but Continental soldiers became the backbone of the American army and of the garrisons at such fortified posts as Albany, Pittsburgh, and West Point. Pennsylvania, like the other states, was defended by both Conti- nentals and militia. Pennsylvania's armed forces, regulars and militia alike, saw their share of active service, and they were heavily engaged in 1777 when the Philadelphia area was the scene of severe fighting. Of course, the state's Continentals did not al- ways behave well; many soldiers of the Pennsylvania Continental Line mutinied on the first of January, 1781. It is not our purpose to discuss the mutiny of the Pennsylvania Line. That event has been described in Carl Van Doren's fine book, Mutiny in January.1. Suffice it to say that the soldiers revolted because of a variety of grievances and marched from their camp in the vicinity of Morristown, New Jersey, toward Philadelphia. -
Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death!”
“Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!” These words first rang out in Richmond’s St. John’s Church on March 23, 1775. Approximately 120 delegates were meeting to discuss Virginia’s position regarding King George III. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were both attending this Second Virginia Convention. The United States was not yet an independent nation. The coLonies were under British rule, which meant King George III governed them. What exactLy was happening in the coLonies at this time? There was a great deal of unrest and there was talk of revolution. The British government thought they had the right to tax the colonies and control their trade. OnLy six months earLier deLegates from 12 of the 13 colonies (Georgia could not attend) met in PhiLadeLphia for the First ContinentaL Congress. They were meeting to decide what to do. Some wanted to stop trade with the British and some were talking of fighting the British. On March 23, 1775 Patrick Henry made his speech to a group of Virginia legislators to convince them that Virginia shouLd support the Revolutionary War effort. BeLow is the closing paragraph of Patrick Henry’s famous speech. The Last 7 words are renown. “It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” Henry’s speech is credited for inspiring the Virginia deLegates to take up arms.