DOCSLIB.ORG

The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion Free FREE BEHIND THE BARS: THE UNOFFICIAL PRISONER CELL BLOCK H COMPANION PDF Scott Anderson,Barry Campbell,Rob Cope,Barry Humphries | 312 pages | 12 Aug 2013 | Tomahawk Press | 9780956683441 | English | Sheffield, United Kingdom Prisoner (TV series) - Wikipedia Please sign in to write a review. If you have changed your email address then contact us and we will update your details. Would you like to proceed to the App store to download the Waterstones App? We have recently updated our Privacy Policy. The site uses cookies to offer you a Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion experience. By continuing to browse the site you accept our Cookie Policy, you can change your settings at any time. Not available This Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion is currently unavailable. This item has been added to your basket View basket Checkout. Added to basket. May Week Was In June. Clive James. Lynda Bellingham. Last of the Summer Wine. Andrew Vine. Not That Kind of Girl. Lena Dunham. Match of the Day Quiz Book. My Animals and Other Family. Clare Balding. Confessions of a Conjuror. Derren Brown. Hiroshima mon amour. Marguerite Duras. Just One More Thing. Peter Falk. George Cole. Tony Wilson. Life on Air. Sir David Attenborough. John Motson. Collected Screenplays. Hanif Kureishi. Holly Hagan. Falling Towards England. Your review has been submitted successfully. Not registered? Remember me? Forgotten password Please enter your email address below and we'll send you a link to reset your password. Not you? Reset password. Download Now Dismiss. Simply reserve online and pay at the counter when you collect. Available in shop from just two hours, subject to availability. Your order is now being processed and we have sent a confirmation email to you at. This item can be requested from the shops shown below. If this item isn't available to be reserved nearby, add the item to your basket instead and select 'Deliver to Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion local shop' at the checkout, to be able to collect it from there at a later date. Preferred contact method Email Text message. When will my order be ready to collect? Following the initial email, you will be contacted by the shop to confirm that your item is available for collection. Call us on or send us an email at. Unfortunately there has been a problem with your order. Please try again or alternatively you can contact your chosen shop on or send us an email at. Warning theme not actived. Check out and follow the Behind The Bars page at www. I've been reading the kind comments you've all posted about myself and 'Auntie Joan' and really can't wait until the Prisoner Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion comes out. Those years were special to me, and I've done my best to contribute as much as I could remember of that time. I haven't seen any of those episodes for at least 15 years, so that was strange. I've read your posts quoting some of my best lines, which made me laugh. Unfortunately, you're all way off. My fave would have to be: 'Rack off. You're not me mum, you can't tell me what to do. Lovely shot of Sheila Florance with Fiona Spence - what are your favourite memories of these two iconic characters? You're only making the place look even more of a mess! Prisoner Cell Block H is on Facebook. Join or. Rob Summers". Pages Liked by Page. Val, an Australian tv icon, is most famous for her Channel 5. Kate Hood - writer, actor, director. Kate Hood is a disabled actor, writer and director who has worked across stage, television ' Recent Post by Page. TV Show 1, likes. Erica Davidson. Related Pages. Prisoner cell block h - wentworth inmates. Bea Smith. Unofficial fan made tribute page dedicated to Queen Bea Smith. We are not associated with Val Lehman Wentworth Prison U. Australia's most famous correctional centre reopens its gates. Wentworth Prison is a dynamic, often See More. The Ultimate Prisoner Fan Group. We are now at a great new group; this page is no longer monitored Please join us at Screen Star Events. Celebrating the best in Australian talent. Behind the Bars. Wentworth Prison UK. Please be respectful - do not post any Wentworth Official Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion Events. Licensed by Fremantle Media Australia to hold meet Prisoner Cell Block H Australia. Mostly made Mrs Brown's Boys. 10+ Best Prisoner h block images | wentworth prison, wentworth, prison Prisoner known in the UK and US as Prisoner: Cell Block H is an Australian television soap operacreated by Reg Watsonwhich broadcast on Network Ten from tolasting eight seasons and episodes, the series was produced by the Grundy Organisation and was filmed at the then Network Ten Melbourne Studios at Nunawading and on location. It follows the lives of the prisoners and staff of the fictional high-security wing of a women's prison, called "H Division" within "The Wentworth Detention Centre", which was set in a fictional suburb called "Wentworth" in Melbourne, Victoria, numerous scenes also took place outside the compound exploring the lives of the inmates and staff outside of the centre, and in particular "Driscoll House", a half-way house where inmates were housed after being released, or neighbouring correction institutions like "Barnhurst" and "Blackmoor". The series gained a positive reception. Initially conceived as a stand-alone miniseries of 16 episodes, its popularity meant it was developed into Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion ongoing series. It has since endured worldwide, acquiring cult classic status, particularly for its somewhat outrageous acting and plotlines. Its cultural impact has inspired several contemporary adaptations, including the equally-successful series Wentworth. Inspired by the British television drama Within These Wallsthe show was initially conceived as a episode series, with a pilot episode bearing the working title "Women Behind Bars". When the initial episodes met an enthusiastic reception, it was felt that Prisoner could be developed into an ongoing soap opera. The early storylines were developed and expanded, with assistance from the Corrective Services Department. The show's themes, often radicalincluded feminism, homosexuality and social reform. Prisoner began in early with the advertising slogan, "If you think prison is hell for a man, imagine what it's like for a woman". The series Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion how women dealt with incarceration and separation from their families, and the common phenomenon of released inmates re-offending. Within the prison, major themes were interpersonal relationships, power struggles, friendships and rivalries. The prisoners became a surrogate family, with self-styled "Queen Bea", Bea Smith and the elderly "Mum" Jeanette Brooks emerging as central matriarch figures. Several lesbian characters were introduced on the show, including prisoners Franky Doyle played by Carol Burns and Judy Bryant played by Betty Bobbittas well as corrupt and sinister officer Joan Ferguson Maggie Kirkpatrick. Characters and story exposition were often ' retconned ' in order to expand potential storylines. Initially there was a men's prison "next door" to Wentworth, but it was never mentioned again after the early episodes. Barnhurst was originally a co-ed prison, soon becoming a women's facility. Its security status varied considerably Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion it being described as an 'open prison farm' by the end of the run; although it was often described Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion "low-security", serial murderers Bea Smith and Marie Winter were housed there for long periods. Although Blackmoor Prison was initially described as a brand new, state-of-the-art maximum-security prison, it was depicted as a Victorian-era workhouse when finally seen. Wentworth was variously described as either new or built during World War IIwith aged infrastructure. During the show's run, several recurring characters were played by multiple actresses and actors. Travers was charged with murdering her husband in a crime of passion after he was found in-bed with another woman her flashback featured a shower scene that was a nod to Alfred Hitchcock 's classic Psychowhilst Warner insisted she was innocent despite her conviction for the abduction and attempted murder of a child. Both women were sent to the prison's maximum-security wing H Blockwhere they were horrified by their new surroundings. Karen, was confronted with a former lover— in prison doctor Greg Miller Barry Quin — and was sexually harassed by violent lesbian cellmate Franky Doyle. Lynn was ostracised by the other prisoners because of her crime prisoners are known for their intolerance of offenders against children and terrorised by Bea Smith who burnt her hand in the laundry's steam press in one of the series' most iconic early scenes. Other, less volatile prisoners included elderly, garden-loving Jeanette "Mum" Brooks who was incarcerated for the euthanasia of her husband who had terminal cancer, teddy-clutching misfit and childlike Doreen Anderson Colette Mannalcoholic former cook recidivist Lizzie Birdsworth Sheila Florancewho apparently poisoned a group of Behind the Bars: The Unofficial Prisoner Cell Block H Companion and seductive prostitute Gladys "Marilyn" Mason Margaret Laurencewho seduced prison electrician Eddie Cook Richard Moir. The prison officers or "screws", as the prisoners call them included firm-but-fair well-heeled governor Erica Davidson Patsy King ; dour deputy governor Vera Bennett Fiona Spencewho was always wanting to become Governor and was nicknamed by Franky "Vinegar Tits"; and firm but compassionate senior officer Meg Jackson later Morris Elspeth Ballantyne.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Judgment Day the Judgments and Sentences of 18 Horrific Australian Crimes
    Judgment Day The judgments and sentences of 18 horrific Australian crimes EDITED BY BeN COLLINS Prelude by The Hon. Marilyn Warren AC MANUSCRIPT FOR MEDIA USE ONLY NO CONTENT MUST BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PERMISSION PLEASE CONTACT KARLA BUNNEY ON (03) 9627 2600 OR [email protected] Judgment Day The judgments and sentences of 18 horrific Australian crimes MEDIA GROUP, 2011 COPYRIGHTEDITED BY OF Be THEN COLLINS SLATTERY Prelude by The Hon. Marilyn Warren AC Contents PRELUDE Taking judgments to the world by The Hon. Marilyn Warren AC ............................9 INTRODUCTION Introducing the judgments by Ben Collins ...............................................................15 R v MARTIN BRYANT .......................................17 R v JOHN JUSTIN BUNTING Sentenced: 22 November, 1996 AND ROBERT JOE WAGNER ................222 The Port Arthur Massacre Sentenced: 29 October, 2003 The Bodies in the Barrels REGINA v FERNANDO ....................................28 Sentenced: 21 August, 1997 THE QUEEN and BRADLEY Killer Cousins JOHN MURDOCH ..............................................243 Sentenced: 15 December, 2005 R v ROBERTSON ...................................................52 Murder in the Outback Sentenced: 29 November, 2000 Deadly Obsession R v WILLIAMS .....................................................255 Sentenced: 7 May, 2007 R v VALERA ................................................................74 Fatboy’s Whims Sentenced: 21 December, 2000MEDIA GROUP, 2011 The Wolf of Wollongong THE QUEEN v McNEILL .............................291
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner Health Background Paper
    Public Health Association of Australia: Prisoner health background paper This paper provides background information to the PHAA’s Prisoner Health Policy Position Statement, providing evidence and justification for the public health policy position adopted by the Public Health Association of Australia and for use by other organisations, including governments and the general public. Summary statement Prisoners have poorer health than the general community, with particularly high levels of mental health issues, alcohol and other drug misuse, and chronic conditions. They are a vulnerable population with histories of unemployment, homelessness, low levels of education and trauma. Health services available and provided to prisoners should be equivalent to those available in the general community. Responsibility: PHAA’s Justice Health Special Interest Group (SIG) Date background paper October 2017 adopted: Contacts: Professor Stuart Kinner, Professor Tony Butler – Co-Convenors, Justice Health SIG 20 Napier Close Deakin ACT Australia 2600 – PO Box 319 Curtin ACT Australia 2605 T (02) 6285 2373 E [email protected] W www.phaa.net.au PHAA Background Paper on Prisoner Health Contents Summary statement ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Prisoner health public health issue ............................................................................................................... 3 Background and priorities ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT of WEST VIRGINIA JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, V. Civil Action N
    Case 1:08-cv-00027-FPS Document 5 Filed 01/23/08 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: <pageID> IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV2 WAYNE DIERKS, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV3 ANTHONY CLINKENBEARD, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV4 JOANN BOLLIGER, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV5 KIMBERLY KLINGLER and JOHN KLINGLER, Defendants. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV6 STEFANIE COSTLEY DOYLE, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV7 BETHANY A. BRANON, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV8 STACEY PAVESI DEBRE, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV9 WINONA RYDER, d/b/a Saks Fifth Ave., Defendant. Case 1:08-cv-00027-FPS Document 5 Filed 01/23/08 Page 2 of 22 PageID #: <pageID> JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV10 DANIEL TANI and ROSE TANI, Defendants. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV11 RATKO MLADIC, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV12 MAKSIM CHMERKOVSKIY, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV13 STEPHEN M. HEDLUND, and OLAF WOLFF, Defendants. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV20 CARLOTTA GALL, d/b/a New York Times Reporter, Defendant. JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:08CV21 MARGARET TALEV, d/b/a McClatchy News Service Reporter, Defendant.
    [Show full text]
  • (Not) a Number : Decoding the Prisoner Pdf Free
    I AM (NOT) A NUMBER : DECODING THE PRISONER PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Alex Cox | 208 pages | 01 May 2018 | Oldcastle Books Ltd | 9780857301758 | English | United Kingdom I Am (not) A Number : Decoding The Prisoner PDF Book Not all prisoners are paid for their work, and wages paid for prison labor generally are very low—only cents per hour. In fact, the incarceration rates of white and Hispanic women in particular are growing more rapidly than those of other demographic groups Guerino et al. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics report Probation and Parole in the United States, , Appendix Table 3, 98, adults exited probation to incarceration under their current sentence; Appendix Table 7 shows 69, adults were returned to incarceration from parole with a revocation. See Wright The percentage of federal prisons offering vocational training also has been increasing, from 62 percent in to 98 percent in The social contact permitted with chaplains, counselors, psychologists,. We discuss each of these limitations in turn. Rehabilitation—the goal of placing people in prison not only as punishment but also with the intent that they eventually would leave better prepared to live a law-abiding life—had served as an overarching rationale for incarceration for nearly a. This represents an increase of approximately 17 percent over the numbers held in and, based on the current Bureau of Prisons prisoner population, indicates that approximately 15, federal inmates are confined in restricted housing. If someone convicted of robbery is arrested years later for a liquor law violation, it makes no sense to view this very different, much less serious, offense the same way we would another arrest for robbery.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION In early 1970, I took a position as an education officer at Pentridge Prison in the Melbourne suburb of Coburg. Assigned to the high- security B Division, where the chapel doubled as the only classroom on weekdays, I became tutor, confidant and counsellor to some of Australia’s best-known criminals. I’d previously taught adult students at Keon Park Technical School for several years, but nothing could prepare me for the inhospitable surrounds I faced in B Division. No bright and cheerful classroom or happy young faces here – just barren grey walls and barred windows, and the sad faces of prisoners whose contact with me was often their only link to a dimly remembered world outside. The eerie silence of the empty cell block was only punctuated by the occasional approach of footsteps and the clanging of the grille gate below. Although it’s some forty years since I taught in Pentridge, the place and its people have never left me. In recent times, my adult children encouraged me to write an account of my experiences there, and this book is the result. Its primary focus is on the 1970s, which were years of rebellion in Pentridge, as in jails across the Western world. These were also the years when I worked at Pentridge, feeling tensions rise across the prison. The first chapter maps the prison’s evolution from its origins in 1850 until 1970, and the prison authorities’ struggle to adapt to changing philosophies of incarceration over that time. The forbidding exterior of Pentridge was a sign of what lay inside; once it was constructed, this nineteenth-century prison was literally set in stone, a soulless place of incarceration that was nevertheless the only home that many of its inmates had known.
    [Show full text]
  • (Her Regular Understudy), Kerry Armstrong Seemed Set for International Stardom
    “She’s a really good actress. She’s also a little bit mad”: (right) Kerry Armstrong in her garden in Melbourne’s eastern hills. Photography Marina Oliphant CARRY ON KERRY With fans like trouper Sid James and future Oscar-winner Helen Hunt (her regular understudy), Kerry Armstrong seemed set for international stardom. So why didn’t the talented actor take Hollywood by storm? Dani Valent fi nds out. t’s 1975, it’s dawn, and kerry armstrong is 16 years old. she’s belly-down on her twin-fin surfboard, paddling out to meet the waves at Point Leo, an hour south-east of Melbourne. She can’t see much because she’s very short-sighted and her big, thick glasses are I lying on a towel on the sand. She can see colours – the dipping and looming green of the water, the blurred white soles of the boy paddling in front – but that’s it.When the water flattens, the teenage surfers stop, turn in the water and wait. Soon Armstrong feels the sea swell, hears a gathering rumble, and knows a set is approaching. She can’t see the waves, so she waits for the boys to yell – “Go, Kerry! Go go go!” – then paddles hard. A wave picks her up and she stands, a goofy-foot in a bikini, and swoops down the hard wall of water, riding blind to the shore.“I can’t believe I surfed without being able to see,” she says, startled at the memory. “I was fearless. What trust I had in the world.” At the time, Armstrong was a spirited schoolgirl actress.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoner Reentry in Perspective
    CRIME POLICY REPORT CRIME POLICY Vol. 3, September 2001 Vol. Prisoner Reentry in Perspective James P. Lynch William J. Sabol research for safer communities URBAN INSTITUTE Justice Policy Center Prisoner Reentry in Perspective James P. Lynch William J. Sabol Crime Policy Report Vol. 3, September 2001 copyright © 2001 About the Authors The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 James P. Lynch is a Professor in the William J. Sabol is a Senior Research www.urban.org Department of Justice, Law, and Society Associate at the Center on Urban (202) 833-7200 at the American University. His Poverty and Social Change at Case interests include theories of victimiza- Western Reserve University, where he is The views expressed are those of the au- tion, crime statistics, international the Center's Associate Director for thors and should not be attributed to the comparisons of crime and crime Community Analysis. His research Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. control policies and the role of incar- focuses on crime and communities, Designed by David Williams ceration in social control. He is co- including the impacts of justice author (with Albert Biderman) of practices on public safety and commu- Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: nity organization. He is currently Why the UCR diverges from the NCS. His working on studies of ex-offender Previous Crime Policy Reports: more recent publications include a employment, of minority confinement chapter on cross-national comparisons in juvenile detentions, and of the Did Getting Tough on Crime Pay? of crime and punishment in Crime relationship between changes in James P.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners' Rights to Physical and Mental Health Care: a Modern Expansion of the Eight Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause Stuart Klein [email protected]
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 7 | Number 1 Article 1 1979 Prisoners' Rights to Physical and Mental Health Care: A Modern Expansion of the Eight Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause Stuart Klein [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation Stuart Klein, Prisoners' Rights to Physical and Mental Health Care: A Modern Expansion of the Eight Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause , 7 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1 (1979). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol7/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Prisoners' Rights to Physical and Mental Health Care: A Modern Expansion of the Eight Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause Cover Page Footnote A note of appreciation is extended to Professors Vincent Nathan, Frank Merritt, and Judy Beckner Sloan This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol7/iss1/1 PRISONERS' RIGHTS TO PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CARE: A MODERN EXPANSION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT'S CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT CLAUSE Stuart B. Klein* I. Introduction In recent years, the primary constitutional amendment used as a means to alleviate poor prison conditions has been the eighth amendment's prohibition against the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment.' The eighth amendment to the United States Consti- tution' is interpreted to prohibit certain actions by the government and to require other affirmative actions.' This prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment is often utilized to insure that ade- quate health care, including psychiatric care, is provided for in- mates.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia's Criminal Justice Costs: an International Comparison
    April 2017 AUSTRALIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE COSTS AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON Andrew Bushnell, Research Fellow This page intentionally left blank AUSTRALIA’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE COSTS: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON Andrew Bushnell, Research Fellow This report was updated in December 2017 to take advantage of new figures from 2015 About the author Andrew Bushnell is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, working on the Criminal Justice Project. He previously worked in policy at the Department of Education in Melbourne and in strategic communications at the Department of Defence in Canberra. Andrew holds a Bachelor of Arts (Hons.) and a Bachelor of Laws from Monash University, and a Master of Arts from Linköping University in Sweden. Australia’s Criminal Justice Costs: An International Comparison This page intentionally left blank Contents 1. Australian prisons are expensive 4 2. Australian prison expenditure is growing rapidly 6 3. Australia’s prison population is also growing rapidly 8 4. Australia also has a high level of police spending 10 5. Australians are heavily-policed 12 6. Australians do not feel safe 14 7. Australians may experience more crime than citizens of comparable countries 16 8. Australia has a class of persistent criminals 18 Australia’s Criminal Justice Costs: An International Comparison 1 2 Institute of Public Affairs Research www.ipa.org.au Overview Incarceration in Australia is growing rapidly. The 2016 adult incarceration rate was 208 per 100,000 adults, up 28 percent from 2006. There are now more than 36,000 prisoners, up 39 percent from a decade ago. The Institute of Public Affairs Criminal Justice Project has investigated the causes of this increase and policy ideas for rationalising the use of prisons in its reports, The Use of Prisons in Australia: Reform directions and Criminal justice reform: Lessons from the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shock of Presence.’ Brook Articulated This Very Clearly in His Essay on Gurdjieff, ‘The Secret Dimension,’
    ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the social, political, and cultural climate which facilitated the emergence of Peter Brook and Jerzy Grotowski as the most influential theatre directors in the Fig. 1. Unknown. Last photograph taken of George Gurdjieff. 1948. second half of the Twentieth Century. Jeremy Johnson This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts THE SHOCK OF (Research) Department of Theatre and Performance Studies. Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Sydney November 2017 PRESENCE Peter Brook & Jerzy Grotowski - The Reinvention of Australian Theatre I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. 1 Table of Contents Prologue 2 Introduction 4 Part 1 1.1 Stanislavski and the Russian Soul 13 1.2 A Challenge to Prevailing Ideologies: 20 How the Cultural Landscape was shaped to receive the Ideas of Gurdjieff in the 1920s and Brook and Grotowski in the 1960s 1.3 Jerzy Grotowski: hic et nunc. The Sacred Aim. 31 1.4 Peter Brook: An Orthodoxy within the Mysticism 37 Part 2 2.1 1960: The Time is Not Yet Ripe 51 2.2 1970: Australia and the Shock of Identity in an Overdue Cultural Revolution 56 2.3 Larrikins, Ockers and the Empty Space 62 2.4 Freestyle Upstream to Jerzy Shore 73 Part 3 3.1 Poor Theatre, Women’s Theatre, and Take No Prisoners 79 3.2 Conclusion: The Socio-Political and Spiritual Legacy 86 Endnotes 96 Bibliography 100 2 Prologue Even at a superficial level, looking at Peter Brook and Jerzy Grotowski, one cannot help but see two sides of the same coin: Brook re-evaluating theatre as an empty space for ritual practice, Grotowski re-evaluating the empty soul of ritual practice and making it theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Convicts, Coolies and Colonialism: Reorienting the Prisoner-Of-War Narrative
    Convicts, Coolies and Colonialism: reorienting the prisoner-of-war narrative FRANCES DE GROEN University of Western Sydney espite its remarkable scope, popularity and durability, the Australian prisoner�f­ D war narrative from the Pacific War, in both documentaryand imaginative forms, has generated little critical attention.1 Scholarly interest in it (as in prisoners-of-war more generally) is a relatively recent phenomenon, identifying it as a dissonant sub­ genre of Australian war writing's dominant 'big-noting' Anzac tradition . Drawing on Carnochan 's concept of 'the literature of confinement', this paper aims to enrich the dialogue about the Pacific War captivity narrative by reading it as 'prison' literature rather than as a branch of 'war' writing. It will also consider the significance of allusions to the Robinson Crusoe myth (a core trope of confinement literature), in the Australian convict and prisoner-of-war traditions. Due to constraints of space, the approach adopted is somewhat schematic and impressionistic and represents ·work in progress' rather than final thoughts. Robin Gerster ( 1987) established the prevailing terms of reference of the Pacific War captivity narrative. For Gerster, because the prisoner-of-war narrative allegedly fo cuses on the captive's 'shame' at being denied his rightful place on the battlefield, writers of prisoner-of-war narrative face 'an acute problem of "public relations"': how to make the non-combatant role attractive.2 Their strategies for dealing with this problem include 'special pleading of passive suffering' (i.e. exploiting the horror and hardship of captivity) and seeking 'vicarious vengeance through mercilessly attacking [the] old enemy in print'.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Directive 69 Management of Prisoner's Money
    Policy Directive 69 Management of Prisoner's Money Relevant instruments: ACCO Notices: 7/2013 and 8/2013 Financial Management Act 2006 Operational Instruction 1 Policy Directives 3 and 36 Prisons Regulations 1982 rr 43-50 and 73 Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia 2004 ss 1.13-1.15, 2.21-2.23, 1.17, 3.21, 4.3 and 5.18 Table of Contents Purpose .............................................................................................................................1 Background........................................................................................................................1 1. Handling of Money......................................................................................................2 2. Prisoners Private Cash ...............................................................................................2 3. Access to Private Cash...............................................................................................3 4. Prisoners' Gratuity Earnings .......................................................................................3 5. Access to Gratuities....................................................................................................3 6. Prisoner's Telephone Account ....................................................................................4 7. Restitution...................................................................................................................4 8. Quality Control ............................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]