The Big Fizzle Is Coming 1.5 Km in Diameter, in Agreement with 5 Work by Scotti and Melosh
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NEWS AND VIEWS COMETSHOEMAKER-LEVY9------------------------------------------------------- al comet nucleus was fairly small, at most The Big Fizzle is coming 1.5 km in diameter, in agreement with 5 work by Scotti and Melosh . Paul Weissman Past estimates of the bulk density of cometary nuclei have ranged from 0.1 to 3 How will the fragments of comet tions show the nucleus of tightly packed 1.3 g cm- , based on comparisons of the Shoemaker-Levy 9 meet their end - with snowballs being torn apart by Jupiter's predicted effects of gases jetting from the a bang or a whimper? That is the question gravity during the close approach, the sunlit surface of comet Halley with de on everyone's mind as the icy fragments hundreds or thousands of snowballs tailed observations of Halley's orbital rush towards their cosmic rendezvous with stretching into a long column in space. But motion6-8. But the many free parameters Jupiter, beginning on 16 July. Will Jupi as the column lengthens and moves away in such comparisons make the estim ter's atmosphere be torn with massive from Jupiter, the individual snowballs ates highly uncertain. More recently, explosions, each greater than the sum of begin to clump together because of their meteoriticists have measured the density all the nuclear weapons on Earth, or will it own self-gravity. The truly amazing result of microscopic cometary dust grains re covered by U-2 aircraft high in the Earth's 9 atmosphere ; these values are typically 3 between 1 and 2 g cm- . Asphaug and Benz's results clearly rule out the lower range of values from the estimates of jetting forces, but may be in conflict with some of the higher values from the comet ary dust grains. A question not answered by Asphaug and Benz is whether the individual dirty snowballs in each clump of Shoemaker Levy 9 have reaccreted into a single body, or whether they are only gravitationally bound dynamical swarms, like bees buz zing around a hive. Several of the clumps have been observed to split, well away from Jupiter's tidal pull, suggesting that within each clump several sub-nuclei may reaccrete, but that a single solid body did not form. Other clumps have dissi pated completely with time, suggesting that the snowball swarms don't reaccrete and instead dynamically disperse or subli mate away. Four suggested structures for a comet nucleus, adapted from ref. 10. a, The nucleus as an icy What does this say about the coming 1 conglomerate, b a fractal structure, C a 'primordial rubble pile', as Asphaug and Benz assume impacts on Jupiter? As the clumps for comet Shoemaker-Levy 9; and d the 'icy-glue' model. approach for their final plunge into the atmosphere at 60 km S-I, Jupiter's gravity be a giant fizzle? We are about to find out. is that the number of clumps formed will again pull them apart. Rather than Whatever the outcome, the breakup of appears to be a function of the density of hitting as a single solid body, they will comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 has provided the individual snowballs. At a density less probably come in as an elongated shotgun 3 fresh clues as to the structure of cometary than 0.4 g cm- , no clumping occurs; at a blast of smaller pellets. Because of Jupi nuclei and their bulk density. One fasci density of 2.4 g cm-3 all the snowballs ter's rapid rotation, the impact sites will be nating example is to be found in the paper come back together to form a single body. spread in longitude, like machine gun by Eric Asphau and Willy Benz on page But at intermediate values, in particular bullets lacing into a moving target. Each p 3 120 of this issue . Asphaug and Benz used between 0.4 and 0.9 g cm- , the snowballs snowball will individually ablate and burn a high-speed computer workstation to form 15 to 20 clumps. Comet Shoemaker up like a meteor in Jupiter's upper atmos model the breakup of Shoemaker-Levy 9 Levy 9 consisted of 21 individual nuclei phere. Lacking the momentum and the when it passed within Jupiter's Roche when it was discovered last year. (Note: structural integrity of a single solid body, limit two years ago. They assumed that the the densities quoted here are those of the they will probably not penetrate deeper comet was a 'primordial rubble pile', a individual snowballs; Asphaug and Benz into the atmosphere, where they might collection of hundreds to thousands of use the bulk density of Shoemaker-Levy 9 explode with many thousands of megatons dirty snowballs, held together only by before it broke up, which is about 27 per of energy. their own self-gravity. cent less because of the voids between the ------- This model for comets was indepen packed snowballs.) 1. Asphaug, E. &Benz, W. Nature370, 120-124 (1994), dently proposed nearly a decade ago by Results are modified if the original 2, Weissman, P. R Nature 320, 242-244 (1986), myself2, and by Bertram Donn and David comet nucleus was rotating. Asphaug and 3, Donn, 8. & Hughes, 0, Proc. 20th ESLAB Symposium on 3 the Exploration of Halley's Comet (eds Battrick, B" Rolfe, Hughes , who referred to their idea as the Benz's simulations rule out a retrograde E.), & Reinhard, R) 523--524 (1986). 'fractal model'. An improved description rotation, because the snowballs then form 4, Weidenschilling, S,), Nature 368, 721-723 (1994), 5, Scotti,), V, &Melosh, H,), Nature 365, 733-735 of how such 50-metre-diameter dirty a large central clump and smaller outlying (1993), snowballs (or more aptly, frozen mud clumps; this was not observed for 6. Rickman, H, in The Comet Nucleus Sample Return Shoemaker-Levy 9. But if the comet had a Mission (ed, Melita, 0.) ESA SP-249, 19!>-205 (1986), balls) might form in the primordial solar 7, Sagdeev, R Z,' Elyasberg, p, E. & Moroz, V.1. Nature nebula and then come together to form prograde rotation, 15-20 clumps are 308,240-242 (1988), kilometre-sized nuclei was recently pro obtained if the density of the snowballs is 8, Peale, S. )./carus82, 36-49 (1989), 4 3 9, Love, S, & Brownlee, D.lcarus(inthe press). vided by Stuart Weidenschilling . higher, perhaps 1.3 g cm- . Asphaug and 10, Weissman, P. R. in The Comet Nucleus Sample Return Asphaug and Benz's dynamical simula- Benz's results also suggest that the origin- Mission (ed, Melita, 0.) ESASP-249,l!>-25 (1986). 94 NATURE . VOL 370 . 14 JULY 1994 NEWS AND VIEWS Thus the giant impacts will produce a Nevertheless, Shoemaker-Levy 9's tions are correct is debatable; their rele spectacular meteor shower of bright legacy will probably be an improved vance here is that they suggest a bigger bolides, but not the massive fireball explo understanding of the nature of cometary vaccination problem because cross sions that have been predicted by some nuclei. It will provide a dramatic con protection implies higher effective Ro researchers. The impacts will be a cosmic firmation of the primordial rubble pile and values. fizzle. The cometary meteors may resem fractal models, and will provide the first ble the bolide which exploded harmlessly definitive bounds on the bulk density of Test at 25-34 km altitude over the south Pacific cometary nuclei. Then again, maybe it One test for cross-protection calculates on 1 February this year, with an estimated won't. D the expected number of people in diffe yield of 15-20 kilotons. The Shoemaker rent age classes who have been exposed to Levy 9 snowball explosions may be closer Paul Weissman is in the Earth and Space different strains, assuming independent to about 30 megatons each, but still far less Sciences Division, Jet Propulsion Labora transmission and some distribution of re than the 100,000 megaton explosions that tory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, production numbers across strains. Gupta some have predicted. California 91109, USA. et al. 5 found that expected and observed numbers matched quite closely when five EPIDEMIOLOGY -- strains studied in Papua New Guinea were each given the same Ro of about 7. This is a useful numerical demonstration of the A theory of malaria vaccination way in which Ro can appear quite small, but it must be seen as no more than Christopher Dye and Geoffrey Targett illustrative for two reasons. First, if expo sure to each strain does not lead to COULD malaria vaccines eradicate Plas strain. Immunity here means that an indi effective protection, then the question of modium falciparum from its stronghold in vidual should be protected against becom cross-immunity is irrelevant. Second, the tropical Africa? While trials of Manuel ing infectious following further exposures supposition that each strain has roughly Patarroyo's S~f66 vaccine l are under way to the parasite; protection of this kind may the same low Ro is not yet backed by 2 in Tanzania , , The Gambia and Thai or may not be associated with clinical detailed calculations of the incidence rates land, following partial successes in South immunity. Second, there must be no of a large collection of strains. Parity of Ro 4 5 America , Gupta et al. have published a cross-protection between strains. values is not in any case essential for their stimulating theoretical analysis which sug Are there strains of P. falciparum that argument; the strains could have Ro values gests that the eradication of malaria by satisfy these two conditions? Gupta which vary from low to very low. Indeed, 5 6 10 vaccination might be nothing like as diffi et al.