Domestic Violence in Maryland
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Evolution of Feminist and Institutional Activism Against Sexual Violence
Bethany Gen In the Shadow of the Carceral State: The Evolution of Feminist and Institutional Activism Against Sexual Violence Bethany Gen Honors Thesis in Politics Advisor: David Forrest Readers: Kristina Mani and Cortney Smith Oberlin College Spring 2021 Gen 2 “It is not possible to accurately assess the risks of engaging with the state on a specific issue like violence against women without fully appreciating the larger processes that created this particular state and the particular social movements swirling around it. In short, the state and social movements need to be institutionally and historically demystified. Failure to do so means that feminists and others will misjudge what the costs of engaging with the state are for women in particular, and for society more broadly, in the shadow of the carceral state.” Marie Gottschalk, The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America, p. 164 ~ Acknowledgements A huge thank you to my advisor, David Forrest, whose interest, support, and feedback was invaluable. Thank you to my readers, Kristina Mani and Cortney Smith, for their time and commitment. Thank you to Xander Kott for countless weekly meetings, as well as to the other members of the Politics Honors seminar, Hannah Scholl, Gideon Leek, Cameron Avery, Marah Ajilat, for your thoughtful feedback and camaraderie. Thank you to Michael Parkin for leading the seminar and providing helpful feedback and practical advice. Thank you to my roommates, Sarah Edwards, Zoe Guiney, and Lucy Fredell, for being the best people to be quarantined with amidst a global pandemic. Thank you to Leo Ross for providing the initial inspiration and encouragement for me to begin this journey, almost two years ago. -
2014 Rape Crisis Center Survey*
2014 Rape Crisis Center Survey* Sexual assault is widespread and devastating. Over forty percent of rape crisis centers were According to the National Intimate Partner and forced to reduce staffing because of funding Sexual Violence Survey/NISVS (CDC, 2011), nearly levels. Of those with staffing reductions, an 1 in 5 women have been the victim of an average of 3 positions were terminated or left attempted or completed rape and over 1.3 million vacant. women are raped in the U.S. in one year. Over 80% of women who were victimized experienced Advocates at rape crisis centers provide the significant impacts such as PTSD, injury (42%) and nation’s frontline response to sexual assault. missed time at work or school (28%). Rape Crisis Centers provide: 24 hour emergency room response; Recent national media attention on campus and 24 hour hotlines; military rape and public accusations of rape crisis intervention; against several celebrities have spotlighted the counseling & support groups; issue of sexual assault. Now, more than ever, our accompaniment to criminal justice nation needs a strong network of rape crisis agencies; centers to lead communities in prevention work awareness and prevention programs; and and to support survivors. a lifeline for survivors. Rape Crisis Center services are based in research Sadly, due to staffing reductions and lack of that works. A 2006 study found that when funding, almost 50% of centers had to decrease victims receive advocate-assisted services they services in at least one critical area. fare better in both short- and long-term recovery. Percentage of 2014 Survey Results centers that decreased service In the past year, rape crisis centers experienced due to lack of an overall loss in funding through a combination funding. -
Sexual Harassment
A Message to the People of California The Women's Rights Handbook has been prepared by the Office of the Attorney General as a summary of women's rights in important areas such as employment, economic independence, education, housing, health care, domestic relations, violent crimes and child care. It also provides other valuable information related to those rights. There is, for example, a section on crimes of violence against women and children, and where victims can get help. In recent years, largely as a result of hard work by countless individuals and organizations concerned with women's rights, courts and legislatures have taken many steps to strengthen guarantees of equal opportunity for women in our society. By the mid-1970s, the need was apparent for a concise reference work in this rapidly changing field. Accordingly, the first Women's Rights Handbook was published by the Attorney General's Office in 1976-77. The booklet was so well received that it was expanded by supplement in 1980, and reissued in revised form in 1983, 1987, and 1990. The 1998 edition of the Women's Rights Handbook, like its predecessors, contains the most current information on new laws and services that benefit women. While women will find this book of special interest, much of the information concerns laws prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, age and disability, as well as sex. Therefore, it will be useful to all persons concerned about fair and equal treatment in employment, economic transactions, housing, business establishments, and other areas. Although a number of topics in this handbook are the subject of intense political debate, it is not our purpose here to take a position on them. -
Domestic Violence: Prevention And· Services
If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~... .' ! DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: PREVENTION AND· SERVICES , ~>' '. f , ,r , ' HEARINGS , ' , BEFORE THE I " . " " I SUBCOMMITTEE ON SELECT EDUCATION "'HE'ARING,S OF THE j , , , 'dFOltE THE , : COlIMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR , '. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARINGS HELD IX WASHIXG'l'OX, D.C" OX JULY 10, 11, 1979 Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and Labor I', ., ' APH 1 ., •. I , , '" :/ " .' " , . '. ' " "', 1 Ii, ~ , , 1 ~, j'l U.S. GOVERNMENT PRIN'.rING OFFICE 4!H114 WASHINGTON: 1979 , .'.' t, " /' ' --/1 .J4 , " ' j :,' 'I. • i;, 't j' }'or sale by the Superintendent or Docnments, U,S. (lovenllnent Printing OHlce Washington, D.C. 20402 \ , < '/ .\ , ' , I, , , I 1 1 , • • CONTENTS 1 HearingsJuly held10, 1979 in Washington, ________________________________________________ D.C. on: _ Page 1 1 July 11, 1979 _________________________ ~ ______________________ _ '" 147 Statement of- Allen, Clara L., Director, New Jer!'1ey Division on Women, Depart- 1 ment of Community Affairs, Trenton, N.J ______________________ _ 67 Allison,istration William ___________________________________________________ W., deputy director, Community Services Admin- _ 213 1 Barnes, Hon. Michael D., a R.epresentative in Congress from the COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND LABOR StateMoulton of ___________________________________________________Maryland; accompanied by Cynthia Anderson and Lise _ , 13 CARL D. PERKINS, KentuckY, Ohalrman Boggs,. ~on. Lindy, a Representative in Congress fl'om the State of JOHN M. ASHBROOK, Ohlo LOulslana __________________________________________________ _ [2 FRANK THOMPSON, Jn., New Jersey JOHN N. ERLENBORN, Dllnols . Brown, Sam, Director, ACTION: accompanied by Torrie Mattes, JOHN BRADlDMAS, Indiana JOHN H. BUCHANAN, JR., Alahama Office of Policy and Planning; Kathleen Fojtik, National Technical 1 AUGUSTUS F. -
Guide for Rape Crisis Centers
illiinois IMAGINES GUIDE FOR RAPE CRISIS CENTERS Illinois Imagines Project May 2010 illiinois IMAGINES OUR RIIGHTS, right now GUIDE FOR RAPE CRISIS CENTERS Section 1: Introduction ..................................... 2-3 Section 2: Creating the Environment................. 3-4 Section 3: Training Your Staff ........................... 5-10 Section 4: Serving Women with Disabilities .... 11-26 Section 5: Training Handouts ........................ 27-34 Section 6 Tools ............................................ 35-70 illiinois IMAGINES SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION illiinois IMAGINES OUR RIIGHTS, right now INTRODUCTION WHAT WILL YOU FIND IN THIS GUIDE? 1. Creating the Environment – Process and tools to enhance the “Disability Responsiveness” of the rape crisis center and conduct community outreach. 2. Training Your Staff – Guidance to create an environment where women with disabilities feel welcome and workers are ready to provide a victim-centered, empathic response. 3. Responding to Sexual Violence – Guidance regarding how to serve women with disabilities. 4. Training Handouts – Handouts to accompany training sessions. 5. Tools – Additional resources to support your response. Rape crisis centers have a long history of serving women who have experienced sexual violence. These services are designed for victim-centered focus from moment of first contact through trauma resolution. These vital services are accessible to all citizens in a community. Yet, women with disabilities are under-represented in the client population, particularly in light of the disproportionate incidence of abuse against them. This guide will help a disability service agency: engage in self-evaluation; enhance accessibility (physical, communication, attitudinal); tailor services to meet needs of women with disabilities; expand outreach and connection to disability service agencies; and prepare staff to serve women with disabilities. -
The #Metoo Movement: an Invitation for Feminist Critique of Rape Crisis Framing
ABRAMS AC 524 (DO NOT DELETE) 4/6/2018 10:09 AM THE #METOO MOVEMENT: AN INVITATION FOR FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF RAPE CRISIS FRAMING Jamie R. Abrams * INTRODUCTION This article invites feminists to leverage the #MeToo Movement as a critical analytical tool to explore the longevity of the enduring rape crisis framing of victim services. Long before the #MeToo Movement, victim services in communities nationwide were framed around a crisis model. For nearly half a century, victims have visited rape crisis centers, called rape crisis hotlines, and mo- bilized rape crisis response teams to provide services and support. This enduring political and social framing around rape as a crisis is opaque,1 has prompted a political backlash,2 and risks distorting hard-fought feminist legal, social, and political battles.3 It has yielded underreporting, underutilization, and recurring risks of budgetary cuts. Yet, this model and terminology have gone virtu- ally unchanged for nearly half a century. * Associate Professor of Law at the University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law. LL.M., 2011, Columbia University School of Law; J.D., 2002, American University, Washington College of Law; B.A., Indiana University–Bloomington. Thanks to Aleisha Cowles, Lindsey Dennis, Mikaela Feng, Abigail Lewis, and Jennifer Reynolds for their re- search support. Thanks to the University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law for a Faculty Development Grant supporting this project. Thanks for the thoughtful feedback and input provided at the Law, Culture, and Humanities Conference (Georgetown University Law Center, Spring 2018) and the Georgetown Legal Practice Scholarship Workshop (Fall 2017). 1. -
Domestic Violence in Washington, DC
Domestic Violence in Washington, DC WHAT IS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE? Domestic violence is the willful intimidation, physical assault, battery, sexual assault, and/or other abusive behavior as part of a systematic pattern of power and control perpetrated by one intimate partner against another. It includes physical violence, sexual violence, threats, and emotional abuse. The frequency and severity of domestic violence can vary dramatically. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN WASHINTON, DC • 32,794 domestic violence-related calls were made to the Metropolitan Police Department in 2013, approximately 1 call every 16 minutes. This figure represents an increase of nearly 1,000 total calls, or 2 additional domestic-violence related calls per day, as compared to 2012.i • 5,005 petitions for Civil Protection Orders were filed in 2013, a 7% increase in filings from 2012. This is a number that has been consistently trending up in recent years, with the number of total filings in 2012 also being a 7% increase over 2011.ii • 5,873 people were served at the two Domestic Violence Intake Center (DVIC) locations in 2013, a 7% overall increase from 2012. The DC Superior Court location served 3,451 persons, and the DVIC satellite office in Southeast Washington (DVIC-SE) served 2,422. While the number served at the Courthouse remained relatively flat, the DVIC-SE located at United Medical Center located in Ward 8 served over 400 more persons in 2013 than 2012, an increase of 20%.iii DID YOU KNOW? • 1 in 3 women and 1 in 4 men have experienced some form of physical violence -
Domestic Violence
May, 2009 A project of the AMERICAN PROBATION AND PAROLE ASSOCIATION In partnership with the NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATE COURTS THE NEW YORK STATE COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and the PENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE With funding from OFFICE ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Duissequis at landiametum vullum init prat irilisi. This project was supported by Grant No. 2001-WT-BX-K011 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily repre sent the official position or poli cies of the U.S. Department of Justice. AUTHORS Ann H. Crowe Project Director American Probation and Parole Association Linda Sydney Senior Research Associate American Probation and Parole Association Matthew DeMichele Research Associate American Probation and Parole Association Susan Keilitz Consultant, National Center for State Courts Contributing Author Connie Neal with Sherry Frohman New York State Coalition Against Domestic Violence with William M. Schaefer, Jr. New York State Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence and with Mike Thomas Monroe County Probation/Community Corrections (NY) Contributing Authors Acknowledgements The American Probation and Parole Association and its project staff gratefully acknowledge the assis tance of the follow- ing members of the project’s Working Group who provided their time and expertise to contribute to and review this document. The Working Group Members and their employment affiliations at the time of their service are listed below. Professor Bonnie Black Susan Keilitz Saul Schoon Office of Justice Studies Consultant Maricopa County Adult Probation Mesa Community College Williamsburg, VA Domestic Violence Unit Mesa, AZ Mesa, AZ Dr. -
Intimate Femicide: an Ecological Analysis
The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare Volume 19 Issue 3 September Article 3 September 1992 Intimate Femicide: An Ecological Analysis Karen Stout University of Houston Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw Part of the Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence Commons, and the Social Work Commons Recommended Citation Stout, Karen (1992) "Intimate Femicide: An Ecological Analysis," The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 19 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol19/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you by the Western Michigan University School of Social Work. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intimate Femicide: An Ecological Analysis KAREN STOUT University of Houston Graduate School of Social Work This research identifies the killing of women by male partners as a mul- tidimensional problem and, through empirical analysis, identifies rela- tionships between intimate femicide and individual, family, community services, state status of women, and violence against women factors. The conceptual base follows an ecological framework. Individual demographic and situationalfactors are presented. The findings of the study indicate that factors within each of the ecological settings are associated with intimate femicide. An implication of this exploratory study is that inti- mate femicide is related to a number of state factors, including factors associated with gender inequality in a state. Introduction Drawing upon an ecological framework and upon a broad range of social work, psychological, criminological, sociologi- cal, and feminist scholarship on violence against women, this study examines factors within ecological settings which may be associated with the killing of women by male intimate part- ners. -
OVC Help Series for Crime Victims: Sexual Violence
Resources for Information The Facts About and Assistance Sexual Violence National Center for Victims of Crime 202–467–8700 www.ncvc.org In 2010, victims age 12 or older experienced a total of 188,380 rapes or sexual assaults.² Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network 1–800–656–HOPE or 1–800–656–4673 In 2010, 91.9 percent of rape victims were www.rainn.org female. Of these, 48 percent were assaulted by friends or acquaintances, 25 percent by National Sexual Violence Resource Center strangers, and 17 percent by intimate 1–877– 739–3895 partners.³ www.nsvrc.org Nearly one in five women is raped in her Directory of Crime Victim Services 4 lifetime; one in six men experiences Office for Victims of Crime OVC 5 a sexual assault in his lifetime. Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice HELP SERIES Approximately 80 percent of female rape http://ovc.ncjrs.gov/findvictimservices victims were raped before age 25; more than for Crime Victims 25 percent of male rape victims were raped by age 10.6 This product was developed by the National Center for Victims of Crime under an agreement with ICF International in support of the Office for Victims ENDNOTES of Crime Training and Technical Assistance Center under contract number GS–23F–8182H/OJP–2006F_124. The opinions, findings, and conclusions Sexual Violence 1Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011, Criminal Victimization, or recommendations expressed in this product are those of the authors and do 2010, Washington, DC. not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. -
Rape Crisis Centers and the Illinois State Budget Impasse
Surviving Austerity: Rape Crisis Centers and the Illinois State Budget Impasse BY ANNE KIRKNER B.A., Pennsylvania State University, 2008 M.A., Colorado State University, 2012 DISSERTATION Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Criminology, Law, and Justice in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Chicago, 2019 Chicago, Illinois Defense Committee: Sarah E. Ullman, Criminology, Law, and Justice, Chair and Advisor Beth Richie, Criminology, Law, and Justice Edna Erez, Criminology, Law, and Justice Lisa Frohmann, Criminology, Law, and Justice LaDonna Long, Roosevelt University Megan Alderden, Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority This dissertation is dedicated to those who work to support survivors of sexual violence. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation committee- Dr. Sarah Ullman, Dr. Beth Richie, Dr. Lisa Frohmann, Dr. LaDonna Long, Dr. Edna Erez, and Dr. Megan Alderden- for their generous and supportive guidance during this process. Through our meetings and classes you have each contributed to my growth as a scholar, researcher, and activist. I would not be completing this degree without your collective kindness. Special thanks to Dr. Ullman for her tireless work with me and the rest of the graduate students she mentors. You teach us every semester that rigorous research and publishing do not have to come at the expense of caring about people. Especially during this last semester in school, I cannot imagine a more supportive environment. I also want to thank Dr. Alderden and the team at ICJIA’s Center for Victim Studies- Dr. Jaclyn Houston-Kolnik, Jennifer Hiselman, and Amanda Vasquez. -
Catherine Johnson CV 2017
Catherine J. Johnson (816) 588-6380 [email protected] As a sworn officer assigned to investigate sexual assaults I was trained to document the facts. As a training coordinator, I learned how to write lesson plans and provide training to those in the field using practical techniques that gave them a better understanding of what it means to work in collaboration with direct service providers to ensure that these cases are handled with proficiency while taking the needs of the victim into consideration. I teach civilian and military sexual assault response professionals how to support and protect victims to enable them to make it through the process. As a sexual assault response coordinator, I am responsible for managing the sexual assault prevention and response program for a military command. Part of my responsibilities include drafting reports and developing training curriculums for the command. EDUCATION B.A. May 2001 (Magna Cum Laude) Department of Criminal Justice, Park University, Parkville MO EMPLOYMENT United States Marine Corps Marine Forces Sexual Assault Response Coordinator June 2014 – Present As a Sexual Assault Response Coordinator (SARC) I serve as the Subject Matter Expert to the Commanding General for the United States Marine Corps Special Operations Command on sexual assault. As the SARC I am responsible for managing the Commander’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Program to include management of uniformed victim advocates, management of victim care, drafting reports, policy letters, and written standard operating procedures for the command. I also create training modules to fulfill uniformed victim advocates continuing education requirement as well as service member’s annual requirements.