Regional Alliances

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Alliances 101-06c Advocacy plan: Regional Alliances Regional Alliances - Advocacy Strategy 2020-2022 Please note: this strategy is a living document and needs further elaboration and thought. It will also need to be updated based on political opportunities that arise in the upcoming months and years until the end of 2022. 1. Advocacy issue 1.1. Definition of the problem: what is the problem? What are the root causes? Who is affected? What are the implications? In a world filled with new threats and opportunities, the European Union, as an actor on the world stage, needs to consolidate relations with its closest partners. The EU is a power that seeks to safeguard its interests vis-à-vis other big players in international relations in full respect of international law and its own values. Ursula von der Leyen, presenting for the first time her College of Commissioners said “My Commission will be a geopolitical Commission committed to sustainable policies. And I want the European Union to be the guardian of multilateralism. Because we know that we are stronger by doing together what we cannot do alone". A significant change in the new EC set up is the replacement of the ‘Development’ Commissioner with a Commissioner for ‘International Partnerships’, and it is unclear whether this marks a linguistic or substantive change. The emphasis on ‘partnerships’ rather than ‘development’ potentially signals a shift away from traditional donor/recipient relations and in this context CONCORD (with its members) must influence the EC interpretation of “international partnership” making sure that it won’t be exclusively focused on business, trade, growth, investment relations but that instead it will prioritise the wellbeing of people and planet and the fight against inequalities, promoting clear commitments towards a fairer and more sustainable world. In recent years CONCORD's policy and advocacy work has been partially "euro-centric" because it often followed the approach of the European institutions in the external action of the European Union and in particular in its Development Cooperation. The experience and the extensive network of the NGOs that CONCORD represents, however, allow for a much broader vision of how the strategic work on the EU external action policies should be carried on. The fundamental issue that ‘Regional Alliances’ working structure would like to tackle is expanding the vision and incorporating the point of view of stakeholders, in particular Civil Society Organisations, NGOs, grassroots organisations (partners of CONCORD and its member organisations) operating in other regions of the world where those policies have the greatest effect and are implemented. - Africa: Africa is of growing importance to the EU, both in its own right, for example as a continent for investment, a source of migration and as a strategic partner in international fora, but also owing to the geopolitical competition unfolding in the region and the EU’s desire to retain its historical influence. Important changes both in Africa and in the EU are forcing the EU (institutions and MS) to review their geopolitical relations: interests have shifted between the two 1 101-06c Advocacy plan: Regional Alliances continents and should move on from the donor-beneficiary approach, overcoming a still quite prominent neo-colonial perspective. The relation between the EU and Africa should become more balanced and must be premised on equal participation and representation. Human rights need to be prioritised within the scope of an increasing business interest and focus on investment in Africa by the EU. CONCORD will focus on advocating for a fair partnership between the EU and Africa and will influence key EU processes like the future of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) -EU partnership agreement, the elaboration of a new Comprehensive Strategy with Africa and related policies that will be implemented after its adoption. The future strategy needs to be based on a broad development agenda, which does not only focus on investment and creation of jobs, but includes the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and achieving the SDGs – including tackling the rising inequalities in the different regions of the African continent. The post-Cotonou agreement (which includes 51 of the 54 African states) is an opportunity to build together with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) partners an ambitious agenda to put people’s rights and the respect of the planetary boundaries at the core. Civil Society’s engagement must be preserved through effective mechanisms that can ensure a meaningful participation of those actors on the ground whose involvement is key to achieve sustainable development. CONCORD will advocate for a "fair partnership" realised not only in language but in the substance and content of policies, funding and programmes, and reflecting policy coherence for sustainable development (PCSD) commitments. - Latin America: The EU is an important economic and political partner for Latin America; it is the leading donor in the region, and an important foreign investor and partner in trade. European Union Member States and the Latin American countries committed themselves to reinforcing the existing strategic partnership between the European Union and Latin America. The EU and Latin America share a common history and culture, and are thus well placed to boost their potential for joint action considerably. In Latin America, in some countries, positive developments have been achieved such as the reduction of poverty through economic reforms and social policies, a greater redistribution of wealth, improved access to education, health and housing and consolidation of democratic principles and rule of law. However, after a decade of high economic growth, the subsequent stagnation in many countries is putting at risk much of the progress made and is threatening to lead to huge numbers of people slipping back into poverty. At the same time, there are increasing public demands for greater democracy and participation and for sustainable economic policies. The 2019 EC Joint Communication “European Union, Latin America and the Caribbean: joining forces for a common future“ sets stronger EU-LAC (Latin America and Caribbean) cooperation in multilateral and international fora and an effective partnership to advance multilateral policies on sustainable development and climate change, as fundamental goals. 2 101-06c Advocacy plan: Regional Alliances CONCORD will focus on advocating for an increased involvement of European and Latin American CSOs in the strategic partnership development and in the official policy processes that are impacting on the region with the aim of prioritising people-centred policies, promoting policy coherence for sustainable development and human rights. CONCORD will also promote effective exchange and know-how sharing between European and Latin American CSOs networks with the aim of empowering local CSOs, sharing lessons learned, tools and support. SMART Objective By 2022, the European Union and its Member States will engage with partner regions in human-rights based partnerships that prioritise sustainable development and the fight against inequalities with an increased space and role for civil society. This objective will be worked out in three ways: 1) Through maintaining structured and effective dialogue and promoting CONCORD advocacy positions with the EU policy-makers responsible for developing, negotiating and coordinating the implementation of the EU regional partnerships and strategies. 2) Through building working relations and alliances with civil society networks and organisations in Europe and in the different regions. The aim will be to share information on political processes, to identify who is working on similar issues to CONCORD, to ensure that we understand what local civil society are calling for (their priorities and recommendations) in these areas and to make sure that these organisations are involved in a meaningful way in the consultations and CS Forums organised in the framework of the regional partnerships. We will try to gather stories, examples and evidence to support our positions in each work area. We will work closely with members in this endeavour and will make all information gathered available to the membership. 3) Through Mainstreaming actions as the work on EU regional partnerships covers the whole range of EU relations with partner countries and will cut across all other work streams and structures. CONCORD will focus on: • understanding the impacts of policy proposals and influencing EU policies and funding on partner countries or regions - advocating for CONCORD’s overarching objective of creating greater equality between people and countries and respecting PCSD. 3 101-06c Advocacy plan: Regional Alliances • analysing the degree to which civil society is consulted in these policies and funding processes and ensuring that stakeholder consultation processes occur, including both European and global civil society. To this end, focal points are established for all three main work streams to ensure that there is constant reporting and a regular information flow that allows the Regional Alliances group to contribute when the other structures in CONCORD are elaborating policy and advocacy documents to incorporate in a timely manner the positions/point of view of the group and of non-European partners and vice-versa. More concretely it will be translated in the following indicative list of activities: 2 approaches: - A. Targeted Africa
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli
    Hon. Mr President of the European Parliament, Dear David Sassoli, Since March, when the outbreak of COVID-19 intensified in Europe, the functioning of the European Parliament (EP) has changed dramatically, due to the sanitary measures applied. We understand the inevitability of the contingency plan, taking into account the need to prevent infection and the spread of the virus and to protect the health and lives of people. Six months later, the functioning of the EP is gradually returning to normal. However, there are services whose unavailability seriously impairs parliamentary work, namely the interpretation service. The European Union (EU) has 24 official languages and all deserve the same respect and treatment. We recognize that the number of languages available in committee meeting rooms has been increasing, but even so, more than half of the languages still have no interpretation. Multilingualism is a right enshrined in the Treaties that allows Members to express themselves in their own language. Now, that is not happening and we are concerned that the situation will continue, even taking into account the expected workflow in the commissions after these atypical six months. In this sense, we appeal, once again, to you, the President of the EP for the application of the letter and the spirit of the principle of multilingualism, finding solutions that respect this principle and that allow the use of any of the 24 official languages of the EU. The expression of each deputy in her/his own language is a priority so that there can be conditions to fully exercise the mandate for which she/he was elected and a condition of respect for the citizens who elected her/him.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121
    GREENRECOVERY REBOOT & REBOOST our economies for a sustainable future Call for mobilisation The coronavirus crisis is shaking the whole world, with devastating consequences across Europe. We are being put to the test. We are suffering and mourning our losses, and this crisis is testing the limits of our system. It is also a test of our great European solidarity and of our institutions, which acted fast at the start of the crisis to deploy measures to protect us. The crisis is still ongoing, but we will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and by fighting together, we will beat the virus. Never have we faced such a challenging situation in peacetime. The fight against the pandemic is our top priority and everything that is needed to stop it and eradicate the virus must be done. We welcome and strongly support all the actions developed by governments, EU institutions, local authorities, scientists, medical staff, volunteers, citizens and economic actors. In this tremendously difficult situation, we are also facing another crisis: a shock to our economy tougher than the 2008 crisis. The major shock to the economy and workers created by the pandemic calls for a strong coordinated economic response. We therefore welcome the declaration of European leaders stating that they will do “whatever it takes” to tackle the social and economic consequences of this crisis. However, what worked for the 2008 financial crisis may not be sufficient to overcome this one. The economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all the companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt.
    [Show full text]
  • WQ3 Mass Arrests of LGBTI Activists in Poland .Pdf
    Question for written answer E-004735/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Pierre Karleskind (Renew), Sophia in 't Veld (Renew), Fredrick Federley (Renew), Karen Melchior (Renew), Nicolae Ştefănuță (Renew), Moritz Körner (Renew), Maite Pagazaurtundúa (Renew), Samira Rafaela (Renew), Radka Maxová (Renew), Liesje Schreinemacher (Renew), Abir Al-Sahlani (Renew), Anna Júlia Donáth (Renew), Irène Tolleret (Renew), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Anne-Sophie Pelletier (GUE/NGL), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Gabriele Bischoff (S&D), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Miapetra Kumpula-Natri (S&D), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield (Verts/ALE), Eleonora Evi (NI), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Maria Arena (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Arba Kokalari (PPE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), Catherine Chabaud (Renew), Ilana Cicurel (Renew), Evelyne Gebhardt (S&D), Laurence Farreng (Renew), Mauri Pekkarinen (Renew), Billy Kelleher (Renew), Andrus Ansip (Renew), Irena Joveva (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Asger Christensen (Renew), Martin Hojsík (Renew), María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos (Renew), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Stéphane Bijoux (Renew), José Ramón Bauzá Díaz (Renew), Stéphane Séjourné (Renew), Svenja Hahn (Renew), Marianne Vind (S&D), Katalin Cseh (Renew), Stéphanie Yon-Courtin (Renew), Magdalena Adamowicz (PPE), Marie-Pierre Vedrenne (Renew), Henna Virkkunen (PPE), Jan- Christoph Oetjen (Renew), Claudia Gamon (Renew), Aurore Lalucq (S&D), Birgit Sippel (S&D), Ramona Strugariu (Renew), Isabel Santos (S&D), Valérie Hayer (Renew), Marisa Matias (GUE/NGL), Maria Walsh (PPE), Kathleen Van Brempt (S&D), Linea Søgaard-Lidell (Renew), Mario Furore (NI), Clara Aguilera (S&D), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Jakop G.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 24 February 2021
    Brussels, 24 February 2021 Declaration from Members of the European Parliament to urge the Commission and Member States not to block the TRIPS waiver at the WTO and to support global access to COVID-19 vaccines We, Members of the European Parliament, urge the European Commission and the European Council to review their opposition to the TRIPS waiver proposal at the World Trade Organisation (WTO), which serves to enable greater access to affordable COVID-19 health technologies, including vaccines, in particular for developing and middle income countries. This call comes in view of the European Council meeting of 25 February 2021 and the crucial decision to be made by all Member States at the WTO General Council on 1-2 March 2021. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the need to ensure global open access to COVID-19 health technologies and to rapidly scale up their manufacturing and supply has been widely acknowledged. However, despite efforts and statements made by the European Commission and several heads of state in support of treating COVID-19 medical products as global public goods, this has not yet translated into actionable realities. In this context, the EU’s open opposition to the TRIPS waiver risks exacerbating a dangerous North-South divide when it comes to affordable access to COVID-19 diagnostics, personal protective equipment, treatments and vaccines. The WTO decision on a potential waiver offers a crucial and much-needed act of effective solidarity, as it is an important step towards increasing local production in partner countries and, ultimately, suppressing this pandemic on a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Standpunkte Aus Der Politik Zu Migration, Sicherheit Und Frieden
    FORUM Standpunkte aus der Politik zu Migration, Sicherheit und Frieden Politikerperspektiven zu Migration im Registrierung von Flüchtlingen in Griechenland und Italien größ- tenteils einig. So fordert etwa der Erste Bürgermeister der Freien und Vergleich Hansestadt Hamburg Olaf Scholz (SPD) ein „wirksames Grenzre- gime“ mit einer Vergemeinschaftung der Außengrenzen und David „S+F. Sicherheit und Frieden. Security and Peace“ ist Forum der McAllister, MdEP (CDU) fordert Frontex zu einer „europäischen Kommunikation für Wissenschaft und Politik, in dem Analyse, Grenzschutzpolizei“ auszubauen. Michael Gahler, MdEP (CDU) Insiderbericht, Standortbestimmung und Einschätzung Platz ha- fordert Europol, Frontex und Eurosur finanziell und personell besser ben. In der Ausgabe 1/2016 analysieren Wissenschaftler(innen) auszustatten. McAllister (CDU) möchte durch Erstaufnahmeein- Migrationspolitik im Themenschwerpunkt „Migration, Sicher- richtungen in Drittländern auch den Schleppern das Handwerk heit und Frieden“. Im Forum sollen auch die aktiven Gestalter legen. Ebenso sei eine schnellere Abschiebung von „unrechtmä- von Migrationspolitik unter Berücksichtigung sicherheits- und ßigen Wirtschaftsmigranten“ (Gahler, CDU) bzw. „Menschen, die friedenspolitischer Aspekte zu Wort kommen. Angefragt wurden keinen Anspruch auf Schutz haben“ (Scholz) oder „abgelehnter Politiker und Politikerinnen aller im deutschen Bundestag ver- Asylbewerber“ (Herrmann, CSU) eine Notwendigkeit. McAllister tretenen Parteien. Eine beachtliche Anzahl von Vertreterrinnen (CDU) unterstützte
    [Show full text]
  • Maria João Rodrigues Relatora De Documento
    www.pseuropa.pt | www.twitter.com/psnaeuropa Nº 116 • JULHO DE 2016 FOTO PE EDITORIAL FRANCISCO ASSIS Esperemos que no final acabe, apesar MARIA JOÃO RODRIGUES RELATORA de tudo, por prevalecer a posição menos DE DOCUMENTO QUE PRETENDE insensata DAR UM NOVO RUMO À EUROPA PÁG. 3 A eventual aplicação de sanções a Portugal por incum- AÇORES primento dos objectivos orçamentais acordados no ano 1. de 2015 constitui uma injustiça e dá um sinal errado. Ao RICARDO SERRÃO SANTOS NA DEFESA longo dos últimos 10 anos, com a excepção do período mais agu- DOS PRODUTORES LOCAIS PÁG. 2 do da crise financeira em que a própria Comissão Europeia ins- tigou os governos nacionais a adoptarem políticas orçamentais expansionistas, os sucessivos executivos portugueses empe- PORTO RECEBEU CONFERÊNCIA nharam-se com sucesso num esforço drástico de consolidação orçamental. O actual governo tem reiteradamente assumido a INTERNACIONAL PROMOVIDA PELOS intenção de prosseguir esse esforço, ainda que recorrendo a ins- EURODEPUTADOS SOCIALISTAS PÁG. 2 trumentos de política económica diferentes. Não há neste mo- mento qualquer razão para pensar que esteja em causa o cabal cumprimento dos objectivos resultantes da nossa participação OPINIÃO na moeda única. O Primeiro-Ministro tem reiterado de forma en- fática a intenção de respeitar as regras em vigor. Como tal, esta ANA GOMES - BREXIT: A RESSACA PÁG. 2 atitude agora adoptada pelas instâncias europeias releva de um fundamentalismo a todos os títulos condenável e especialmen- CARLOS ZORRINHO - COMBATER te impróprio no contexto da profunda crise existencial que afec- ta a União Europeia. Esperemos que no final acabe, apesar de O “DEFICIT DEMOCRÁTICO” NA UE PÁG.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruxelles, 11 Novembre 2020 DÉCLARATION COMMUNE De
    Bruxelles, 11 novembre 2020 DÉCLARATION COMMUNE de députés européens sur l'approche à deux poids deux mesures de l'UE en matière de pesticides dangereux Nous, députés du Parlement européen, appelons la Commission européenne à interdire l'exportation de pesticides qui ont été interdits dans l'Union européenne (UE) en raison de leurs effets néfastes sur la santé et l'environnement, et à cesser d'importer des denrées alimentaires produites avec ces substances dangereuses en dehors de l'UE. L'UE possède certaines des lois sur les pesticides les plus strictes au monde et a déjà interdit ou strictement limité l'utilisation de nombreux pesticides susceptibles de causer de graves dommages à la santé humaine ou à l'environnement. Cependant, les entreprises restent libres d'exporter ces produits dangereux pour une utilisation dans des pays tiers. En outre, l'UE autorise également l'importation de denrées alimentaires produits avec des pesticides interdits. Exportations de pesticides trop dangereux pour une utilisation dans l'UE En 2018, les pays de l’Union européenne ont approuvé l’exportation de 81 615 tonnes de pesticides contenant des substances dont l’utilisation est interdite dans leurs champs en raison des risques inacceptables qu’ils présentent pour la santé humaine ou l’environnement. C'est ce que dévoile une étude publiée le 10 septembre 2020. Au total, 41 pesticides interdits dans l’UE ont été annoncés à l’exportation par une trentaine de sociétés depuis 11 pays membres. La plupart des exportations sont destinées à des pays plus pauvres comme l'Afrique du Sud, l'Ukraine et le Brésil.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Directory of the European Union
    ISSN 1831-6271 Regularly updated electronic version FY-WW-12-001-EN-C in 23 languages whoiswho.europa.eu EUROPEAN UNION EUROPEAN UNION Online services offered by the Publications Office eur-lex.europa.eu • EU law bookshop.europa.eu • EU publications OFFICIAL DIRECTORY ted.europa.eu • Public procurement 2012 cordis.europa.eu • Research and development EN OF THE EUROPEAN UNION BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑ∆Α • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND • ÖSTERREICH • POLSKA • PORTUGAL • ROMÂNIA • SLOVENIJA • SLOVENSKO • SUOMI/FINLAND • SVERIGE • UNITED KINGDOM • BELGIQUE/BELGIË • БЪЛГАРИЯ • ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA • DANMARK • DEUTSCHLAND • EESTI • ΕΛΛΑΔΑ • ESPAÑA • FRANCE • ÉIRE/IRELAND • ITALIA • ΚΥΠΡΟΣ/KIBRIS • LATVIJA • LIETUVA • LUXEMBOURG • MAGYARORSZÁG • MALTA • NEDERLAND
    [Show full text]
  • Mapa De Poder Na Rede EN 31Marco V3
    PORTUGAL TOP 50: MAP OF POWER ON THE NET Influential Politicians in Twitter March 2015 BARCELONA | BOGOTÁ | BUENOS AIRES | LIMA | LISBOA | MADRID | MÉXICO | PANAMÁ | QUITO | RÍO DE JANEIRO | SÃO PAULO | SANTIAGO DE CHILE | SANTO DOMINGO Elaborado por TOP 50 DUARTE MARQUES MAP 45 LÍDIA BULCÃO DIOGO FEIO RUI 28 49 OF POWER MOREIRA JORGE SEGURO FILIPE SANTOS MARISA MATIAS SANCHES 29 HENRIQUES 47 LUÍS VALES PEDRO 11 27 PASSOS COELHO 12 ON THE NET PAULO PEDROSO ANTÓNIO FILIPE 13 MÁRIO RUIVO 30 7 CATARINA MARTINS Influential Politicians 44 CARLOS 10 COELHO in Twitter 14 ANTÓNIO JOSÉ SEGURO JOANA PORTUGAL - March 2015 33 AMARAL DIAS MICHAEL RUI TAVARES 8 SEUFERT TOP 50 RANKING Map of Power on the DANIEL 25 MIGUEL TIAGO OLIVEIRA 3 Net - Influential Politicians in Twitter is 16 1 the result of the research work by IMAGO - LLORENTE & CUENCA to PEDRO MOTA identify, measure, and compare the SOARES 32 9 EDITE ESTRELA level of influence held by the main Por- tuguese politicians in the digital arena. ANÍBAL 15 MARIA GRAÇA CARVALHO CAVACO SILVA 26 The research conducted took as its MAP OF starting point the premise that Twitter - INFLUENCE INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE + INFLUENCE INFLUENCE - INFLUENCE is the maximum example of online in- fluence - an open space where informa- 0 25 50 75 POWER 75 50 25 0 tion is public, in which relationships are JOSÉ GUSMÃO 34 50 established and ideas spread more PEDRO SANTANA LOPES concisely and quickly than on any other 42 ADOLFO social network. MESQUITA NUNES NUNO MELO 48 24 GARCIA PEREIRA Is there any link between online pres- ANTÓNIO 31 ANA 6 ence and influence outside the Inter- PRÔA GOMES net? Should personal online assets be 41 RUI RIO explored by politicians as mechanisms JOSÉ 17 to approach their voters? These and JUNQUEIRO 4 23 LUIS MENEZES other questions are discussed in this 2 CARLOS study.
    [Show full text]
  • Európsky Parlament 2014-2019
    Európsky parlament 2014-2019 Výbor pre rozvoj Výbor pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka AGRI_PV(2018)0227_1 ZÁPISNICA zo spoločnej schôdze, ktorá sa konala v utorok 27. februára 2018 od 15.00 do 17.30 h v BRUSELI Schôdza sa začala o 15.10 h. Predsedali jej podpredseda výboru DEVE Stelios Kouloglou a podpredsedníčka výboru AGRI Maria Gabriela Zoană. O 16.20 h sa vedenia schôdze ujala podpredsedníčka výboru AGRI Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, ktorou bola nahradená Maria Gabriela Zoană. Utorok 27. februára 2018 Za prítomnosti Rady a Komisie 1. Prijatie programu schôdze Rozhodnutie:Návrh programu schôdze bol prijatý. 2. Oznámenia predsedníctva Alan Matthews (Trinity College, Dublin, Írsko), odborník pre skupinu II, musel svoju cestu kvôli dopravným problémom zrušiť. 3. Spoločné verejné vypočutie výborov DEVE a AGRI o vplyve spoločnej poľnohospodárskej politiky na rozvojové krajiny Rečníci: Stelios Kouloglou, Maria Gabriela Zoană, Maria Blanco (profesorka poľnohospodárskej ekonomiky, Španielsko), Adama Diallo (predseda UMPL-B, Burkina Faso), Olivier de Schutter (spolupredseda IPES-Food, Belgicko), Maria Heubuch, Norbert Neuser, Maria Lidia Senra Rodríguez, Marc Tarabella, Maria Noichl, Martin Häusling, Luke Ming Flanagan, Mairead McGuinness, Ulrike Müller, Daniel Buda, Albert Deß, Harald von Witzke (Humboldtova univerzita, Berlín, Nemecko), Clara Eugenia Aguilera García, Phil Hogan (komisár pre poľnohospodárstvo a rozvoj vidieka), Leonardi Mizzi (GR DEVCO), Karin Kadenbach 4. Rôzne otázky PV\1148129SK.docx PE619.196v01-00 SK Zjednotení
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]