DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Crucifixion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1. Crucifixion By: Paul T. Fanning, Tyler, Texas1 “We preach Christ, and Christ crucified – to the Jews a stumbling block, and to the Gentiles foolishness.” 1 Corinthians 1:23. While we are studying this topic,2 please ponder one question in the back of your mind: ‘Why did Jesus have to be crucified?’ After all, couldn’t the “plan” have provided for the Messiah pricking His finger with a pin and allowing just one drop of His sacred blood to fall to earth before He died peacefully in His sleep and then risen? After all, He is the Alpha and the Omega, the eternal God of the Universe, and infinitely both holy and good. Wouldn’t just the inconvenience of having to adopt human flesh and nature and spilling just one drop of His sacred blood have been sufficient to cleanse the whole planet of sin? Why did Jesus become a spectacle and give it all? We know He didn’t want to do it.3 1 Paul T. Fanning earned B.A. and J.D. degrees from The University Of Texas At Austin in 1968 and 1972, respectively. He was then encouraged by Dr. David O. Dykes, Pastor of Green Acres Baptist Church, Tyler, Texas, who convinced him that he actually could do “this.” Thereafter, he was privileged to study under two of the outstanding Bible scholars of our time, Thomas S. McCall, Th.D. (September 1, 1936 – ), and Mal Couch, Ph.D., Th.D., (July 12, 1938 – February 12, 2013) who participated in his ordination at Clifton Bible Church, Clifton, Texas, on March 8, 2011. 2 This is not intended to be a theological study. That’s good because I am merely a lay theologian. I understand and accept that Jesus needed to suffer and die in order to satisfy justice. It occurs to me that the punishment due man for sin is not crucifixion, but eternal damnation. It wasn’t that finite man gave offense that merits man’s eternal death, but that finite man elected to offend infinite and eternal God. Nevertheless, the “Average Joe” also is not a theologian and doesn’t care one wit for theology. What he cares about is knowing that God loves him, and loves him a lot; what he cares about is whether he can trust God to love him. That’s what this paper is all about. If you would like to know more about the theology behind Christ’s sacrifice, I refer you to Anselm, who wrote Why Did God Become Man?, which became the most influential treatise on the atonement in the Middle Ages, or the Summa Theologica of Thomas Aquinas. Rather, this article will focus on the origin, history, propagation, and methodology of crucifixion and how Jesus, in His human nature, was able to persist through it to His death, voluntarily for our sakes. These facts, plus the fact of His Resurrection three Hebrew days later, are precisely why man can trust God to love him. 3 Matthew 26:39: And going a little farther he fell on his face and prayed, saying, “My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as you will.” 1 © March 26, 2019, by Paul T. Fanning Why This Lesson? Sadly, most Christians in the 21st Century have become awfully complacent about what Jesus voluntarily did on the cross for our sakes. The process of crucifixion – the actual, detailed mechanics of it – lies at the very heart of the Gospel. If you don’t fully understand it, you don’t fully appreciate the length, breadth and depth of the Love of Jesus, the Messiah, for you. Here lies the foundation of our weak trust – trust that must last our lifetimes. He could have stopped it – the agony, the pain, spiritual, physical, and emotional – by instantaneous will; but He persisted. He knew weak people like me needed Him to do it unto death. The Crucifixion of Jesus Christ is not only at the heart of His Gospel; but if you are a Christian, it is at the very heart of your life. It is by His death that it is even possible that a Christian can live. It is at the very core of everything you do and the bedrock of your every attitude. Resurrection was the easy part, and serves as glorious proof that He Catholic Art: Jesus Is Scourged, Mocked, And Crowned With accomplished His mission of saving us. Thorns Crucifixion through death, without giving up even for a nanosecond, was the hard part. The Latin word “crux,” from which the word “crucifixion” is derived, was such a horrible word during the time of the Romans they wouldn’t even mention it out loud in polite conversation.4 Crucifixion is arguably the most hideous kind of execution ever invented within the depravity of the sinful mind of man. Yet, when Jesus returns to rule the Earth from the throne of David during His Millennial Kingdom,5 the work He accomplished on the cross will still be a primary aspect of His identity. He still bears the scars in His wrists, ankles, and side.6 It is because we are in Him and He is crucified that we are 4 Marcus Tullius Cicero, Verrem 2:5.165. 5 See Revelation, Chapter 20. 6 The Hebrew concept of anatomy included the wrist with the hand and the ankle with the foot. 2 © March 26, 2019, by Paul T. Fanning acceptable to the Father, who is inimical to sin, which we are without Jesus crucified. Jesus will be King over all the world during the thousand years and beyond, but He will always be our Savior because of His spilt blood on the cross. First Roman Destruction of Jerusalem, 70 C.E. Background. When I was a boy, I often thought about the crucifixion of Jesus. I attended thirteen years of Roman Catholic schools, five of which I was studying for the priesthood. I took my religion very seriously. Over that time I spent many hours praying on my knees before Catholic crucifixes, some of which were quite bloody and grotesque. In all the movies (including the old black and white movies of the 1940’s and 1950’s that I watched with my grandma) they either never showed the Roman troopers really erecting a cross from scratch or they showed them pulling on various mechanisms that were simply too time-consuming and labor-intensive to be accurate.7 7 There was actually one Italian film that I know of which showed Jesus carrying only the crossbeam to Calvary, but it never became popular in the U.S. I have found American audiences quite resistant to two 3 © March 26, 2019, by Paul T. Fanning Historical Facts And Insights. Anthropologists estimate the Romans crucified approximately 30,000 Israelis before they crucified Jesus, and countless more afterwards, especially after the First Jewish–Roman War (66–73 CE), sometimes called The המרד :Great Revolt (Hebrew :ha-Mered Ha-Gadol, Latin ,הגדול Primum Iudæorum Romani Bellum.),8 and the Bar Chokhba Revolt (132–136 C.E.), approximately fifty years later.9 Furthermore, archeologists have Romans And Their Slaves Manning A Siege Engine At recently discovered that early First Jerusalem (Catapulta) Century Nazareth was also an army town that garrisoned the Northern Cohort of the 10th Legion Fretensis.10 facts: 1) Jesus only carried the crossbeam (patibulum) because the vertical beams (stirpes) were permanently installed in the ground; and 2) His feet were not crossed in front of Him. Four nails were used, not three. Furthermore, the feet were not nailed to the fronts of crosses. Rather, they were nailed, one on each side, to the sides of the vertical beams (“trees”). Americans are so conditioned by incorrect medieval artwork that they view these two facts as almost blasphemous. Medieval artwork was itself influenced by actions and/or records of the actions of the legions in Israel and Palestine, subsequent to the time of Christ. It was then, after the time of Christ, and only rarely, that victims’ feet were placed on the front of crosses. 8 Chronicled by Titus Flavius Josephus (37 – c. 100), also called Joseph ben Matityahu (Biblical Yosef ben Matityahu), who wrote that at its fall in 70 C.E., Jerusalem was inhabited ,יוסף בן מתתיהו :Hebrew by more than one million souls. The end of this revolt is marked by the famous and heroic fall of Masada. However, very few were able to successfully flee to Masada. The survivors of the “First Jewish War” never made it that far and were crucified, put to the sword, sold into slavery, or banished to lands other than Israel. 9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Chokhba_revolt . May 31, 2012. After subduing the Bar Chokhba Revolt, the Romans attempted to blot out the name “Judea” from language and history. They renamed the province Palestina (after their word for the Philistines). This marks the beginning of the Diaspora. The Jews had no homeland again until 1948 C.E. Maps found at the backs of Bibles showing “Palestine” at the time of Christ or shortly after are simply inaccurate. This accounts for continued friction between Christians, who claim to know more about Scripture than the Jews, and the Jews themselves. This is plainly unnecessary and wrong. It was simply an incorrect convention (stemming from the British Empire’s modeling the Roman Empire) to refer to the Holy Land as “Palestine” when most of those Bibles were published by well-meaning, but “historically challenged,” Christians. 10 Walvoord, John F., Zuck, Roy, Dallas Theological Seminary, The Bible Knowledge Commentary, Matthew 2:19-23.
Recommended publications
  • On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ

    On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ

    On the Physical Death of Jesus Christ William D. Edwards, MD; Wesley J. Gabel, MDiv; Floyd E. Hosmer, MS, AMI Jesus of Nazareth underwent Jewish and Roman trials, was flogged, Talmud, and by the Jewish historian and was sentenced to death by crucifixion. The scourging produced deep Flavius Josephus, although the au¬ stripelike lacerations and appreciable blood loss, and it probably set the thenticity of portions of the latter is stage for hypovolemic shock, as evidenced by the fact that Jesus was too problematic.26 weakened to carry the crossbar (patibulum) to Golgotha. At the site of The Shroud of Turin is considered crucifixion, his wrists were nailed to the patibulum and, after the patibulum by many to represent the actual buri¬ was lifted onto the upright post (stipes), his feet were nailed to the stipes. al cloth of Jesus,22 and several publi¬ The major pathophysiologic effect of crucifixion was an interference with cations concerning the medical as¬ normal respirations. Accordingly, death resulted primarily from hypovolemic pects of his death draw conclusions shock and exhaustion asphyxia. Jesus' death was ensured by the thrust of a from this assumption."' The Shroud soldier's spear into his side. Modern medical interpretation of the historical of Turin and recent archaeological evidence indicates that Jesus was dead when taken down from the cross. findings provide valuable information (JAMA 1986;255:1455-1463) concerning Roman crucifixion prac¬ tices.2224 The interpretations of mod¬ ern writers, based on a knowledge of THE LIFE and teachings of Jesus of credibility of any discussion of Jesus' science and medicine not available in Nazareth have formed the basis for a death will be determined primarily by the first century, may offer addition¬ major world religion (Christianity), the credibility of one's sources.
  • Study 29 Presentation the Story Also Talks About Five Movements That

    Study 29 Presentation the Story Also Talks About Five Movements That

    Study 29 Presentation The Story also talks about five movements that take part in God’s Story: Movement 1: The Story of the Garden (Genesis 1-11) Movement 2: The Story of Israel (Genesis 12 – Malachi) Movement 3: The Story of Jesus (Matthew – John) Movement 4: The Story of the Church (Acts – Jude) Movement 5: The Story of a New Garden (Revelation) Paul’s Final Days Paul wrote most of the books of the New Testament. Reason for writing – Important to remember that he wrote books to reinforce what he had taught in those places and often to address specific questions that had been raised by the people – sometimes have to work backward to determine the reason for Paul’s responses Word of God – At the same time we recognize that the Bible is the inspired word of God so it speaks to us with timeless truths as well. Three years at Ephesus – Paul stayed there longer than any other place on his journeys; Paul met with the Ephesian elders on his way to Jerusalem at the end of the third missionary journey and wrote to Ephesus during his first imprisonment Ephesus Large and important city – on the coast of Asia Minor 300,000 residents – larger than the capitol, Pergamum Architecture – Community baths, gymnasiums, and impressive buildings, including a huge library Wealthy homes – with frescoed walls Temple of Artemis or Diana – one of the seven wonders of the ancient world Goddess of the hunt, moon, and fertility – temple prostitution and magic Silversmiths – sold images of Diana; big source of revenue Timeless Truth: Suffering and Perseverance are
  • The Cathar Crucifix: New Evidence of the Shroud’S Missing History

    The Cathar Crucifix: New Evidence of the Shroud’S Missing History

    THE CATHAR CRUCIFIX: NEW EVIDENCE OF THE SHROUD’S MISSING HISTORY By Jack Markwardt Copyright 2000 All Rights Reserved Reprinted by Permission INTRODUCTION Shortly after the dawn of the thirteenth century, a French knight toured the magnificent city that was then Constantinople and, upon entering one of its fabulous churches, observed a clear full-body image of Jesus Christ gracing an outstretched burial cloth.1 Those who advocate that this sydoine was, in fact, the Shroud of Turin, are challenged to credibly account for the relic’s whereabouts both prior to its exhibition in Byzantium and during the period spanning its disappearance in 1204 to its reemergence some one hundred and fifty years later.2 In this paper, the author suggests that medieval crucifixes, orthodox and heretical, evolved from increased awareness of the sindonic image and that these changes mark the historical path of the Shroud as it traveled in anonymity from East to West. THE ORTHODOX CRUCIFIX By the early third century, the cross was the recognized sign of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire and, over the next several centuries, the use of this symbol became so widespread that it is found on most remnants of the era.3 Perhaps repulsed by the ignominious nature of Christ’s death,4 the earliest Christians did not portray his crucifixion. “The custom of displaying the Redeemer on the Cross began with the close of the sixth century”5 and the first datable manuscript image of the Crucifixion is that found in a Syrian Gospel Book written in 586.6 The sudden rise
  • Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A

    Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A

    The Linacre Quarterly Volume 55 | Number 2 Article 16 May 1988 Why Did He Die in Three Hours?: Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A. Brucker Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended Citation Brucker, Edward A. (1988) "Why Did He Die in Three Hours?: Thoughts on the Crucifixion," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 55: No. 2, Article 16. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol55/iss2/16 Why Did He Die in Three Hours? Thoughts on the Crucifixion Edward A. Brucker, M.D. Doctor Brucker has served as director of laboratories at several hospitals and has, for the past 18 years, been a deputy medical examiner for Pima County in Arizona. He has studied and given lectures on the Shroud of Turinfor the past 27 years. Many problems exist with our understanding of crucifixion looking backward approximately 2,000 years. We know Constantine abolished crucifixions about 337 A. D. so that there is no known personal experience since that time of individuals reporting on crucifixions. Two events which add to our knowledge, however, and give us some insight as to how crucifixion was performed and what happened to the individual would be the Shroud of Turin which is probably the most important, and secondly, in 1968 in a Jewish cemetery - Givat ha M ivtar - in which the bones of a crucified individual, Johanaham, were identified with the nail being transfixed through the ankle bone and with scrape marks being identified on the radius bone. Other than these two events, we are limited to what the ancient historians and writers had to say about crucifixion.
  • The Courts of Judea

    The Courts of Judea

    University of Michigan Law School University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository Articles Faculty Scholarship 1894 The ourC ts of Judea Jerome C. Knowlton University of Michigan Law School Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/974 Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Knowlton, Jerome C. "The ourC ts of Judea." Mich. L. J. 3, no. 11 (1894): 299-307. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MICHIGAN LAW JOURNAL. VOL. III. NOVEMBER, 1894. No. 11. THE COURTS OF JUDEA. The study of Jewish jurisprudence has become interesting during the past ten years through the efforts of some painstaking scholars, who have not been burdened with any particular dogma, but have been actuated by a true Christian spirit- They have been close students of those portions of the Talmud which throw light on the jurisprudence of the Jews.* We understand the meaning of the following terms: The Legisla- ture, the Court, the City Council, the Board of Supervisors, the Township Board and the School Board. Which .one of these fairly represents the Jewish Shanhedrim? Not any one of them. But if you can coin an English word which shall express the powers and duties of all of these municipal bodies imposed upon one, you may be able to correctly define the Sanhedrim in Judea.
  • {DOWNLOAD} Cross

    {DOWNLOAD} Cross

    CROSS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK James Patterson | 464 pages | 29 Apr 2010 | Headline Publishing Group | 9780755349401 | English | London, United Kingdom Cross Pens for Discount & Sales | Last Chance to Buy | Cross The Christian cross , seen as a representation of the instrument of the crucifixion of Jesus , is the best-known symbol of Christianity. For a few centuries the emblem of Christ was a headless T-shaped Tau cross rather than a Latin cross. Elworthy considered this to originate from Pagan Druids who made Tau crosses of oak trees stripped of their branches, with two large limbs fastened at the top to represent a man's arm; this was Thau, or god. John Pearson, Bishop of Chester c. In which there was not only a straight and erected piece of Wood fixed in the Earth, but also a transverse Beam fastened unto that towards the top thereof". There are few extant examples of the cross in 2nd century Christian iconography. It has been argued that Christians were reluctant to use it as it depicts a purposely painful and gruesome method of public execution. The oldest extant depiction of the execution of Jesus in any medium seems to be the second-century or early third-century relief on a jasper gemstone meant for use as an amulet, which is now in the British Museum in London. It portrays a naked bearded man whose arms are tied at the wrists by short strips to the transom of a T-shaped cross. An inscription in Greek on the obverse contains an invocation of the redeeming crucified Christ.
  • Evidence Bearing on the Subject of Sanctioned Killing in the Middle Kingdom

    Evidence Bearing on the Subject of Sanctioned Killing in the Middle Kingdom

    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Faculty Publications 2008-01-01 Royal Executions: Evidence Bearing on the Subject of Sanctioned Killing in the Middle Kingdom Kerry M. Muhlestein [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Other Religion Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Muhlestein, Kerry M., "Royal Executions: Evidence Bearing on the Subject of Sanctioned Killing in the Middle Kingdom" (2008). Faculty Publications. 891. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/891 This Peer-Reviewed Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Page 181 “Royal Executions: Evidence Bearing on the Subject of Sanctioned Killing in the Middle Kingdom,” in The Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient , 51/2 (2008): 181-208. By Kerry Muhlestein, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Ancient Scripture and Ancient Near Eastern Studies Brigham Young University Abstract The pages of this journal, and other publications, have seen disagreement in the past regarding the methods of and reasons for sanctioned killing in Ancient Egypt. Some of this disagreement stems from having looked at large expanses of time without regard to change, and to arbitrarily imposed limitations. By looking at a larger corpus of evidence and restricting the examination to a specific period of time, this paper establishes that the Middle Kingdom engaged in a number of methods of sanctioned killing for more reasons than has often been supposed.
  • Tolerant Criminal Law of Rome” in the Light of Legal and Rhetorical Sources

    Tolerant Criminal Law of Rome” in the Light of Legal and Rhetorical Sources

    UWM Studia Prawnoustrojowe 25 189 2014 Artyku³y Przemys³aw Kubiak Katedra Prawa Rzymskiego Wydzia³ Prawa i Administracji Uniwersytetu £ódzkiego Some remarks on tolerant criminal law of Rome in the light of legal and rhetorical sources Introduction Roman criminal law, as majority of ancient legal systems, is commonly considered cruel and intolerant. Most of these negative views is based on the fact that the Romans created and used a great variety of painful and severe penalties, very often accompanied by different kinds of torture or disgrace1. Although such opinions derive from legal and literary sources, occasionally in their context a very important factor seems to be missing. Sometimes in the process of evaluation of foreign or historical legal systems researchers make a mistake and use modern standards, both legal and moral, and from this point of view they proclaim their statements. This incorrect attitude may lead to ascertainment that no legal system before 20th century should be judged positively in this aspect. However, the goal of this paper is not to change those statements, as they are based on sources, but rather to give examples and to underline some important achievements of Roman crimi- nal law which, sometimes forgotten or disregarded, should be considered in the process of its historical evaluation. 1 The most cruel are definitely aggravated forms of death penalty, such as crucifixion (crux), burning alive (vivi crematio), throwing to wild animals during the games (damnatio ad bestias), throwing to the sea in a sack with ritual animals (poena cullei). These are the most common, but during the history of Roman empire there existed many other severe kinds of capital punishment, see A.W.
  • A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1729 Adam Stueck Marquette University

    A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1729 Adam Stueck Marquette University

    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1729 Adam Stueck Marquette University Recommended Citation Stueck, Adam, "A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1729" (2012). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 174. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/174 A PLACE UNDER HEAVEN: AMERINDIAN TORTURE AND CULTURAL VIOLENCE IN COLONIAL NEW FRANCE, 1609-1730 by Adam Stueck A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2012 ABSTRACT A PLACE UNDER HEAVEN: AMERINDIAN TORTURE AND CULTURAL VIOLENCE IN COLONIAL NEW FRANCE, 1609-1730 Adam Stueck Marquette University, 2012 This doctoral dissertation is entitled, A Place Under Heaven: Amerindian Torture and Cultural Violence in Colonial New France, 1609-1730 . It is an analysis of Amerindian customs of torture by fire, cannibalism, and other forms of cultural violence in New France during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Contemporary French writers and many modern historians have described Amerindian customs of torturing, burning, and eating of captives as either a means of military execution, part of an endless cycle of revenge and retribution, or simple blood lust. I argue that Amerindian torture had far more to do with the complex sequence of Amerindian mourning customs, religious beliefs, ideas of space and spatial limits, and a community expression of aggression, as well as a means of revenge. If we better understand the cultural context of Amerindian torture, we see more clearly the process of cultural accommodation in New France.
  • Emergency Care of the Crucifixion Victim

    Emergency Care of the Crucifixion Victim

    Accident and Emergency Nursing (2002) 10, 235–239 ª 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/S0965-2302(02)00127-3, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Emergency care of the crucifixion victim Scott L DeBoer, Charles L Maddow ... of all punishments, it is the most cruel and most terrifying Cicero, first century A.D. Of all the terrible ways to die, most people say that death by fire or death by drowning are the worst. If you lived 2000 years ago however, you most certainly would disagree. Throughout world history, one of the most feared deaths was that of crucifixion. This article will guide you through the medical, psychological, and emotional aspects of crucifixion. The death of the man called Jesus Christ will be used to illustrate the use of a punishment that was unequalled in its cruelty and depth of suffering. This article will review not only the injuries associated with crucifixion, as well as current medical archaeological theories relating to the suffering and eventual death on a cross, but Scott L DeBoer also using the introduction case study, the initial assessment and resuscitation of a crucifixion RN,MSN,CEN,CCRN, CFRN Flight Nurse victim will be addressed. Regardless of religious beliefs, this article will give attendees a Educator: UCAN, deeper awareness of ‘‘and they crucified him’’. ª 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights University of Chicago Hospitals, reserved. Owner: Peds-R-Us Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois USA Charles L Maddow ... MD, Senior Medic 101 to County General We are en route it still is being performed as evidenced by the Instructor of with a 33-year old male who was the victim of a current practice in areas of the Philippines, Emergency crucifixion.
  • Crucifixion in Antiquity: an Inquiry Into the Background and Significance of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion

    Crucifixion in Antiquity: an Inquiry Into the Background and Significance of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion

    GUNNAR SAMUELSSON Crucifixion in Antiquity Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe 310 Mohr Siebeck Gunnar Samuelsson questions the textual basis for our knowledge about the death of Jesus. As a matter of fact, the New Testament texts offer only a brief description of the punishment that has influenced a whole world. ISBN 978-3-16-150694-9 Mohr Siebeck Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament · 2. Reihe Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich) Mitherausgeber / Associate Editors Friedrich Avemarie (Marburg) Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Hans-Josef Klauck (Chicago, IL) 310 Gunnar Samuelsson Crucifixion in Antiquity An Inquiry into the Background and Significance of the New Testament Terminology of Crucifixion Mohr Siebeck GUNNAR SAMUELSSON, born 1966; 1992 Pastor and Missionary Degree; 1997 B.A. and M.Th. at the University of Gothenburg; 2000 Μ. Α.; 2010 ThD; Senior Lecturer in New Testament Studies at the Department of Literature, History of Ideas and Religion, University of Gothenburg. ISBN 978-3-16-150694-9 ISSN 0340-9570 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 2. Reihe) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbiblio­ graphie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de. ©2011 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to reproductions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed by Laupp & Göbel in Nehren on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Nadele in Nehren.
  • Seven Days Before the Crucifixion

    Seven Days Before the Crucifixion

    THE LAST WEEK OF OUR LORD’S MINISTRY WITH TEXTS AND ARTICLES FOR EACH DAY’S READING 7 days before Passover. Traveling toward Jerusalem. Matt. 20:17-28; Luke 18:35-43; 19:1-10; R. 3362 (Z ’04-138); R. 3847 (Z ’06-278). 6 days before Passover. Jesus came to Bethany and in the evening Mary anointed our Lord. John 12:1-8; Mark 14:3-9; Matt. Matthew 26:6-12. R. 2447 (Z ’99-76); R. 3534 (Z ’05-103). 5 days before Passover. They strewed palm branches; He rode into Jerusalem. Matt. 21:1-16; 23:37-39; Psa. 8:2; Luke 19:40. R. 3537 (Z ’05-108); R. 2745 (Z’00-380); R. 3850 (Z ’06-281). 4 days before Passover. Cursing of fig tree; cleansing of Temple; He taught the people there. Matt. 21:17-32; Mark 11:12-19; John 2:13-22. R. 5503 (Z ’14-219); R. 5920 (Z ’16-204); R. 4122 (Z ’08-25). 3 days before Passover. Teaching in Temple; challenged with questions; tried to catch Him in His words. Many parables given on this day. Matt. 22:15-46; 23:14-39; 25:1-13. R. 3852, (Z ’06-284); R. 1982 (Z ’96-115); R. 2746, c. 2, p. 2-3 (Many of His parables given) = (Z ’00-382, c. 1, p. 1). 2 days before Passover. There is no record of the events of this day; it was probably spent in retirement at Bethany. R. 3542, c. 1, p. 7 (Z ’05-118); R.