DOCSLIB.ORG

College Voice Vol.14 No.21

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
College Voice Vol.14 No.21 Connecticut College Digital Commons @ Connecticut College 1990-1991 Student Newspapers 3-12-1991 College Voice Vol.14 No.21 Connecticut College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1990_1991 Recommended Citation Connecticut College, "College Voice Vol.14 No.21" (1991). 1990-1991. 4. https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/ccnews_1990_1991/4 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Newspapers at Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1990-1991 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Connecticut College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author. ; _ E Volume XIV, Number 21 Ad Fontes March 12, 1991 Faculty Task Force Neglects Student Input on Evaluations question on the draft questionnaire. The question read by Michelle Moon The College Voice "How has this course contributed to your knowledge of gender and other traditionally underrepresented ~ Reg Edmonds, '92, chair of academic affairs, told the groups?" Student Government Association Assembly this week ~ According to Claire Gaudiani, '66, president of the e that a second draft of the new standardized faculty college, the faculty believed that question interfered evaluation form "bears no resemblance" to a draft with academic freedoms. "To create a political, philo- ~. which was collaborated on by a comrniuee of students sophical test for a course is, on principle, a bad idea," from the Board of Advisory Chairs (BAC) and mem- she said. J bers of an administrative Task Force on Faculty "I was not infonned of any other serious problems Evaluation. with the questionnaire," said Edmonds. I "I was stunned when I received the latest draft on 4 When Edmonds received the second draft of the 31 March and noted the dramatic differences between the questionnaire, "I was stunned," he said. "This form [the two versions," Edmonds stated in a memo distributed second draft] came out of the blue. I was under the l'---~~--=============--==-=----' to SGA. The new draft "reflects no student input impression that the first draft was still intact. We did Freedom of the press has been a divisive issue on whatsoever," he said. not want [the second draft] presented to the faculty." campuses lately. The Connecticut ColIege Philosophy The Task Force, which was formed by the Board of The BAC cornrniucc was most concerned with the Club hosted a debate on Tuesday entitled "Voice v, J. Trustees and consists of faculty members, began de- omission of questions asking whether textbooks, e~- Board," In addition, at Brown University on Wednes- veloping a standardized course evaluation fonn last ams and papers, and lectures and critiques, were heir- day a panel, which included Geraldine Ferraro, dis- October, while BAC worked on a student draft. ful. According to Edmonds, "In mid October the BAC The student committee also believes that questions cussed free press and ethics in America. (Seepp.l0·ll). committee and the Task Force agreed to work together like "How challenging was this course?" and "Would to develop a questionnaire ... that reflected the con- you recommend this course to anol.hcr student?" were eerns of both students and faculty." too vague and offered no basis for evaluation. Tax Forms Reveal In January members of the BAC committee and the Edmonds arranged to meet with members of the Task Force met to "reconcile the BAC commiuee's Task Force before the second draft was presented tothe questionnaire and the Task Force's questionnaire," faculty March 5 \0 outline these concerns. Presidential Pay Hike Edmonds said. "In \hat meeting we discussed OUI diS{J\easUTew,\b, Members of the Iwo groups agreed on a question- !he process by which the questionnaire was allCeed ... mance and pay," he said. naire that was presented JD Ihe faculty in their February II became clear thaI the Task Force realized the ncces- by Sarah Huntley The Board has the sole decision- 6 meeting and discussed February 13 in an infonna- sity of continued student input and support of Ihe News Editor making prerogative and access to tiona! session. questionnaire," Edmonds said. The salary of Claire Gaudiani, information in this area. After the meetings, Edmonds said he was "led to The Task Force agreed to present the students' con- '66, president of the college, in- According to John Maggiore, believe" the faculty had difficulties with only one See Evaluations p. 9 creased by 19 percent after her first '9I,presidentofSGAandmember -----~--------------------------------- year in office, according to tax of the Priorities, Planning and forms flied with the Internal Rev- Budget Committee (pPBC), the enue Service. committee which develops the Hampton Confirms Existence of a Gaudiani's salary, set at budget does not know individual $100,834 in 1988- I989, rose- by salaries. Primary Suspect in Hamilton Case $19,249. In her second year, PPBC members receive figures Gaudiani earned $120,083. pooled by each department to set This information was made aside for salaries, but the alloca- Officials Adopt Conservative, Cautious Timetable public by the Congressional law, tions are not itemized. Budget Reconciliation Act, 26 Larry Friedman, '89, Young whether the administration plans to the detective will make sure there is U.S.c. Sections 6104, 6652, 6685; Alumni Trusteeand memberof the by Chris McDaniel mediate the mailer on campus. "sufficient information to press Associate News Editor 1987. All 990 documents, the tax Board's Finance Committee, re- While the dean said the original charges" exists before any fonnal forms for non-profit organizations fused to answer questions about Despite unforcasted delays in the list of a half dozen suspects has accusations are made. and accompanying schedules, are the president's salary. investigation, Robert Hampton, been narrowed, Hampton was un- "The New London Police have available to anyone interested. In addition, Friedman, a mem- dean of the college, confirmed this able to speculate when the case been here almost daily," said When questioned about the in- ber of the Board's Finance Com- week that there is a primary suspect might be closed. He said the in- Hampton. The police have been in crease, Gaudiani said, ''I'm not in a mittee, said he could not answer in the Hamilton arsonist case. vestigation could take weeks or Hamilton and have conducted inter- position to discuss my personal sal- questions on guidelines and proce- Hampton refused to divulge the months. views with students and Campus ary issues." dures for approval of administra- name of the primary suspect, how- Hampton called Gerard Jynor, Safety officers. According to Because of the president's refusal tive raises because he does not ever, saying that the student has New London Police detective and Hampton, a Campus Safely officer to comment, it is not clear whether know them. retained the services of an allorney. head of the arson investigation, "a still remains on duty 24 hours a day the increase was a raiseorpart of an According to Jane Bredeson, No arrest has been made yet, seasoned veteran," and he believes in Hamilton. agreement made at the time of secretary of the college and despite initial administrative opti- Gaudiani's hiring. spokesperson for the Board of mism and a February 23 estimation CT View pp, 6-7 Her first-year salary was $644 Trustees, the trustees meet in ex- by Joseph Tolliver, dean of Student Features pp. 4-5 greater than that of Oakes Ames, ecutivesession toreview presiden- Life, that someone would be ap- ][ former president of the college, at tial performance and pay. prehended in three to five days. RAM receives Lecture explores the time of his departure. Bredeson said there are no by- When asked why the investiga- award for newspaper Lynn Brooks, acting vice presi- law provisions stipulating the tion has taken so long, Hampton N community service publication dent of finance, said the president policy or vote requirements, said, "It is a little more complex does not have a long-term contract, In 1989-1990, the year of than we had assumed." He added, D and it is unlikely, in his opinion, Gaudiani's pay increase, the cost "The more we knew. the more we A & E pp.16-17 Sports pp. 18-20 that the increase was automatic. of education rose by $1 ,700, a ten discovered we needed to know." Justifying the administration's Brooks said, however, that he did percent hike. E Swimmers excel at not know specifics. According to The Chronicle of ardent stand against revealing Student Spotlight: According to Brooks, the Board Higher Education, the median names of suspects, Hampton said, Carl Bernard championships fIIl-r X .' .- .:: ofTrustees oversees administrative presidential salaries at comparable "It might make it impossible to salaries. Trustees are responsible institutions range from $69,700 to handle [the situation] internally if! (~5 for monitoring the "accountability $115,000 in 1989. mentioned names of suspects." Comics pp. 8 & 14 of the president, both in perfor- Hampton gave no indication as to ~"r c VIEWPOINT :: Arabic Studies Needed- Not Just to Get a Job ler II -.,.. 1M AI'I iMJ e. III .... Id....... Leiter to the Voice: Middle East, such as prejudice seventh century the Arabian penin- ...... ~ r' ........ ~ A few weeks ago, an article ap- against Arab-Americans, would sula gave the world Islam. one of cGiIIIllljpiOwe". 1IFpo: I&iit respcet: aD ,...Jr__ peared in the Voice addressing the have been alleviated or avoided the three great monotheisms and .. ,......· eor'l.'ed. need for an Arabic Studies depart- entirely if Americans in general the fastest growing religion in the SClIlIpt .. ""._eat and self'-IfOW!I'IUIII(e are lJIgbIy prized ment here at Connecticut College knew more about Arabs and their world.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Patrick James Barry a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of The
    CONFIRMATION BIAS: STAGED STORYTELLING IN SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARINGS by Patrick James Barry A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2015 Doctoral Committee: Professor Enoch Brater, Chair Associate Professor Martha Jones Professor Sidonie Smith Emeritus Professor James Boyd White TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SITES OF THEATRICALITY 1 CHAPTER 2 SITES OF STORYTELLING 32 CHAPTER 3 THE TAUNTING OF AMERICA: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF ROBERT BORK 55 CHAPTER 4 POISON IN THE EAR: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF CLARENCE THOMAS 82 CHAPTER 5 THE WISE LATINA: THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION HEARING OF SONIA SOTOMAYOR 112 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION: CONFIRMATION CRITIQUE 141 WORK CITED 166 ii CHAPTER 1 SITES OF THEATRICALITY The theater is a place where a nation thinks in public in front of itself. --Martin Esslin, An Anatomy of Drama (1977)1 The Supreme Court confirmation process—once a largely behind-the-scenes affair—has lately moved front-and-center onto the public stage. --Laurence Tribe, Advice and Consent (1992)2 I. In 1975 Milner Ball, then a law professor at the University of Georgia, published an article in the Stanford Law Review called “The Play’s the Thing: An Unscientific Reflection on Trials Under the Rubric of Theater.” In it, Ball argued that by looking at the actions that take place in a courtroom as a “type of theater,” we might better understand the nature of these actions and “thereby make a small contribution to an understanding of the role of law in our society.”3 At the time, Ball’s view that courtroom action had an important “theatrical quality”4 was a minority position, even a 1 Esslin, Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • Feb 2011 Newsletter Final For
    Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation Newsletter February 2011 President George W. Bush Discusses His New Book “Decision Points” at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum On December 2, 2010, President George W. Bush was warmly received by Susan Ford Bales, Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation Trustees, Library and Museum staff as well as over 250 Friends of Ford for a special moderated question and answer discussion about his book, Decision Points. Susan Ford Bales, daughter of President Gerald R. Ford and Mrs. Betty Ford, introduced President Bush. She commented on the special friendship between the Bush and Ford families. Bales said “It’s a personal joy and honor today to welcome – with a big smile – a man of principle and compassion, a man of impeccable integrity and honesty, a man of courage and humility, a man my father deeply respected and was so proud to call his friend.” President Bush commented that he and Susan belong to a very exclusive club. “Children of the Presidents Club”. President Bush spoke for over an hour to an overflow crowd that listened intently. There were numerous funny moments. President Bush was asked how it feels to be a bestselling author, he said, “Some people are shocked I can even read, much less write.” He talked about the decision point President Susan Ford Bales and President George W. Bush outside President Ford’s Foundation office. Ford made to pardon Richard Nixon as being one of the great Presidential decisions. “It was a selfless decision, a decision that likely cost him the presidency,” Bush said.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Create a Graduate Minor in Bioethics
    Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities Proposal for a Graduate Minor in Bioethics June, 2015 [Revised September, 2015] [Revised October, 2015] Graduate Studies Committee Proposing the Graduate Program MA in Bioethics: Ryan Nash, MD, MA (Chair) Alan Litsky, MD, ScD Karla Zadnik, OD, PhD 1. Title of the proposed graduate minor: Graduate Minor in Bioethics 2. Rational for its development Currently, the University does not offer any programs on the graduate level in bioethics. In light of the established presence of bioethics as a multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary field, the Center for Bioethics was launched in 2013 with the task of addressing this need. An MA in Bioethics has been proposed, and a Graduate Minor in Bioethics is a natural programmatic extension of the proposed MA in Bioethics. In short, the primary rational for developing the Graduate Minor is to offer scholarship and training in ethics for graduate students in a field that warrants the University’s attention. As part of the planning process for the MA program, Ryan Nash (Director, Center for Bioethics) met with deans and directors from the OSU health campus colleges and schools—including College of Medicine, Biomedical Science, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Nursing, College of Optometry, College of Pharmacy, and College of Veterinary Medicine—to discuss the MA and Graduate Minor. The leaders from the health campus colleges and schools have all expressed agreement that a Graduate Minor in Bioethics would serve their graduate students well. Further conversations with leadership in the Colleges of Public Affairs, Law, Public Health, Social Work, the Department of Philosophy, and other “stakeholder” disciplines for bioethics have led to the same consensus that a Graduate Minor is a welcome addition for the University.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioethics and the Law EDITORIAL ADVISORS
    Bioethics and the Law EDITORIAL ADVISORS Vicki Been Elihu Root Professor of Law New York University School of Law Erwin Chemerinsky Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law University of California, Irvine, School of Law Richard A. Epstein James Parker Hall Distinguished Service Professor of Law University of Chicago Law School Peter and Kirsten Bedford Senior Fellow The Hoover Institution Stanford University Ronald J. Gilson Charles J. Meyers Professor of Law and Business Stanford University Marc and Eva Stern Professor of Law and Business Columbia Law School James E. Krier Earl Warren DeLano Professor of Law The University of Michigan Law School Richard K. Neumann, Jr. Professor of Law Hofstra University School of Law Robert H. Sitkoff John L. Gray Professor of Law Harvard Law School David Alan Sklansky Professor of Law University of California at Berkeley School of Law Kent D. Syverud Dean and Ethan A. H. Shepley University Professor Washington University School of Law Elizabeth Warren Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law Harvard Law School Bioethics and the Law Second Edition Janet L. Dolgin Jack and Freda Dicker Distinguished Professor of Health Care Law Hofstra University School of Law Lois L. Shepherd Center for Biomedical Ethics and Humanities Professor of Law Associate Professor, Public Health Sciences University of Virginia Law & Business AUSTIN BOSTON CHICAGO NEW YORK THE NETHERLANDS # 2009 Aspen Publishers. All rights reserved. http://lawschool.aspenpublishers.com No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Joanne Bridgett Ciulla, Ph.D. Professor of Leadership Ethics
    Joanne Bridgett Ciulla, Ph.D. Professor of Leadership Ethics, Department of Business and Global Management Director of The Institute for Ethical Leadership Rutgers Business School, Rutgers University Office Address Home Address Rutgers Business School 100 West 57th Street Apt. 9G Rutgers University New York, New York 10019 1 Washington Park, room 1050 (212)245-2602 Newark, New Jersey 07102 (973) 353-5812 Email [email protected] Academic Appointments • Rutgers Business School, Department of Business and Global Management, Professor of Leadership Ethics (tenured) & Director of The Institute for Ethical Leadership (January), 2017-present • The Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Professor & Coston Family Chair in Leadership and Ethics 1991-2016 (tenured in 1995) Professor Emerita 2017-present • The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (Joint appointment in Legal Studies and Management Departments), Senior Fellow, 1986-1991 • Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration (General Management Department) Harvard Fellow in Business and Ethics, 1984-1986 • La Salle University (Philosophy Department) 1975-1984, Lecturer 1975-1979, Assistant Professor 1979-1984 Visiting Academic Appointments • Honorary Visiting Professor, Shanghai Academy of the Social Sciences, 2013-2017 • Visiting Professor, Nyenrode Business Universiteit, The European Institute for Business Ethics, Breukelen, The Netherlands, 2009-2015 • Gourlay Visiting Professor of Ethics in Business, University of Melbourne,
    [Show full text]
  • UM Telecourses to Explore Nuclear Age, Ethics in America
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present University Relations 12-14-1988 UM telecourses to explore nuclear age, ethics in America University of Montana--Missoula. Office of University Relations Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/newsreleases Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation University of Montana--Missoula. Office of University Relations, "UM telecourses to explore nuclear age, ethics in America" (1988). University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present. 11353. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/newsreleases/11353 This News Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Relations at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Montana News Releases, 1928, 1956-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY MONTANA Office of News & Publications University of Montana Missoula, Montana 59812-1301 (406) 243-2522 December 14, 1988 UM TELECOURSES TO EXPLORE NUCLEAR AGE, ETHICS IN AMERICA MISSOULA — The University of Montana Center for Continuing Education and Summer Programs will bring thought-provoking courses on "War and Peace in the Nuclear Age" and "Ethics in America" to public television viewers throughout the state this winter. The courses, available for two undergraduate or graduate credits each, were produced with major funding from The Annenberg/CPB Project. Viewers should check their local listings for stations, dates and times. The 13 segments of "War and Peace in the Nuclear Age," which begin Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHICS of TEACHING: BELIEFS and BEHAVIORS of COMMUNITY COLLEGE FACULTY Renay Ford Scales, B.S., M.A. Dissertation Prepared
    ETHICS OF TEACHING: BELIEFS AND BEHAVIORS OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE FACULTY Renay Ford Scales, B.S., M.A. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS March 2002 APPROVED: Ron Newsom, Major Professor and Chair Nancy Boyd, Minor Professor Jessie Jones, Committee Member Michael Altekruse, Chair of the Department of Counseling Development and Higher Education M. Jean Keller, Dean of the College of Education C. Neal Tate, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Scales, Renay Ford, Ethics of Teaching: Beliefs and Behaviors of Community College Faculty. Doctor of Philosophy (Higher Education) August 2002, 97 pages, 5 tables, references, 73 titles. This study examines the ethical beliefs and behaviors of full-time community college faculty. Respondents report to what degree they practice sixty-two behaviors as teachers and whether they believe the behaviors to be ethical. Survey participants engaged in few of the behaviors, and only reported two actions as ethical: (1) accepting inexpensive gifts from students and (2) teaching values or ethics. The participants reported diverse responses to questions about behavior of a sexual nature, but most agreed that sexual relationships with students or colleagues at the same, higher or lower rank were unethical. Additional findings relate to the presence of diversity among the faculty, using school resources to publish textbooks and external publications, selling goods to students, and an expansive list of other behaviors. Findings of this study are compared to results from earlier studies that utilized the same or similar survey instrument with teaching faculty. The study has implications for organizational policy and procedure, for faculty training and development, the teaching of ethics or values in the classroom and for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM on LEADERSHIP Strand L1: Character Development
    State of California – Military Department 13-Oct-17 California Cadet Corps CURRICULUM ON LEADERSHIP Strand L1: Character Development Level 11 This Strand is composed of the following components: A. Character in Leadership B. Moral Leadership C. Ethical Leadership CURRICULUM ON LEADERSHIP Strand L1: Character Development Contents C. ETHICAL LEADERSHIP ................................................................................................................................ 3 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 3 C1. What Ethics Is, and Is Not .............................................................................................................. 4 C2. Ethical Dilemmas ............................................................................................................................ 6 C3. Ethical Decision-Making ............................................................................................................... 10 References .............................................................................................................................................. 13 CURRICULUM ON LEADERSHIP Strand L1: Character Development C. ETHICAL LEADERSHIP OBJECTIVES DESIRED OUTCOME (Leadership) 90% of Unit Cadets are able to 1. Discuss problems with defining ethics. Select the best definition of ethics. 2. Describe ethical dilemmas 3. Describe the decision-making/problem solving process and where
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM on MILITARY SUBJECTS Strand L1: Character Development
    CURRICULUM ON MILITARY SUBJECTS Strand L1: Character Development Level 11 This Strand is composed of the following components: A. Character in Leadership B. Moral Leadership C. Ethical Leadership Contents C. ETHICAL LEADERSHIP ................................................................................................................................ 3 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................. 3 C1. What Ethics Is, and Is Not .............................................................................................................. 4 C2. Ethical Dilemmas ............................................................................................................................ 6 C3. Ethical Decision-Making ............................................................................................................... 10 References .............................................................................................................................................. 13 C. ETHICAL LEADERSHIP OBJECTIVES DESIRED OUTCOME (Leadership) 90% of Unit Cadets are able to 1. Discuss problems with defining ethics. Select the best definition of ethics. 2. Describe ethical dilemmas 3. Describe the decision-making/problem solving process and where ethics fits in C1. What Ethics Is, and Is Not Some Problems with Defining Ethics This section was adapted from “What is Ethics?” article by Valasquez, Andre, Shanks, S.J., and Meyer appearing
    [Show full text]
  • Available From
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 364 461 SO 023 481 TITLE 319 Current Videos and Software for K-12 Law-Related Education. INSTITUTION American Bar Association, Chicago, Ill. Special Committee on Youth Education for Citizenship. SPONS AGENCY Department of Education, Washington, DC. REPORT NO ISBN-0-89707-908-6 PUB DATE 93 CONTRACT S123A10055 NOTE 49p. 1 AVAILABLE FROMAmerican Bar Association, Youth Education for Citizenship, National Law-Related Education Resource Center, 541 North Fairbanks Court, Chicago, IL 60611-3314. PUB TYPE Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) -- Guides - Classroom Use - Instructional Materials(For Learner) (051) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; *Audiovisual Aids; Citizenship Education; *Courseware; Elementary Secondary Education; *Law Related Education; Optical Disks; Social Studies; Videotape Recordings ABSTRACT This publication assembles into one volume a comprehensive listing of more than 300 electronic media sources on the subject of law-related education (including the Bill of Rights, Constitution, the Courts, Congress, etc.) for grades kindergarten through 12. Items include laser disks, computer software, videotapes, and CD-ROMs (compact disk/read-only memory). While the products that appear in the document focus on law-related education, many are appropriate for other subject areas as well. The directory, an annotated bibliography, divides the materials into video and software listings. While the bulk of the products are stcondary level items, many are applicable to elementary
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics in America II Discussion Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………………………… i 1. DOING GOOD AND AVOIDING EVIL: Fundamentals of Philsophical Ethics ......................................... 1 2. THE THEORY BEHIND THE PRACTICE: Why We Choose the Right and Refuse the Wrong.............41 3. CHOOSING JUSTICE: Elections and Judicial Independence............................................................................59 4. THREE FAREWELLS: Medicine and the End of Life........................................................................................90 5. WAR STORIES: National Security and the News ...............................................................................................120 6. MY BROTHER'S KEEPER: Personal Ethics......................................................................................................149 7. A BETTER BRAIN: The Ethics of Neuro-enhancement..................................................................................182 8. RISK, REWARD, RESPONSIBILITY: Ethics in Business...............................................................................217 INTRODUCTION Welcome to Ethics in America II. As with the original Ethics in America—brilliantly conceived and launched by the late Fred Friendly, Edward R. Murrow Professor at Columbia University’s School of Journalism—this six-part series of programs and accompanying materials covers diverse topics of public, private, and professional ethics. It will be broadcast on public television, available as DVDs, and can be found on the Annenberg Media
    [Show full text]
  • Politics, Ethics and Capital Punishment in America Professor
    Review of History and Political Science June 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 13-30 ISSN: 2333-5718 (Print), 2333-5726 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2015. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/rhps.v4n1a2 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/rhps.v4n1a2 Politics, Ethics and Capital Punishment in America Professor Anthony R. Brunello1 Abstract A critical opportunity for the abolition of capital punishment was passed in the 1970s in America. Evidence indicates that the reasons for the return of executions was not simply based on Supreme Court decisions, but propelled by a fearful reaction in American political culture to the changes wrought by the Civil Rights Movement and the turbulence of the Vietnam Era Anti-War movement. Americans demanded a visible response to their security fears as regards crime and punishment. Americans wanted more frequent and more severe punishments of those identified as perpetrator of violent crime. A second opportunity to abolish capital punishment may be emerging in the 21st century, but will the United States make the next steps in overcoming the failure of “moral arguments” over time? Critical questions regarding the application of public ethics in America can be understood in an examination of capital punishment. Keywords: Women, Conflict, Peace building, Capacity building, Nigeria Part I: Political Dialogue and Capital Punishment In 2014 America witnessed another execution mess in Oklahoma. The lethal injection used to execute death- row inmate Clayton Lockett on April 30th led to a grotesque drama, with the inmate sitting up, clenching his teeth, and only expiring due to a heart attack after 43 minutes of painful exertions.
    [Show full text]