Oakland City Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. _____________ C.M.S. INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER ______________________________ A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING BANKS THAT HAVE MET THEIR 2000 FAIR SHARE GOALS PURSUANT TO THE CITY’S LINKED BANKING SERVICE ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City Council adopted an amended Linked Banking Services Ordinance, Ordinance No. 12066 C.M.S., on July 14, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Ordinance established a process for determining which banks have met their “Fair Share Goals” for Oakland community lending; and WHEREAS, an assessment of the 2000 performance of Oakland banks in meeting their Faire Share Goals for community lending pursuant to the Linked Banking Services Ordinance was conducted, and seven banks were found to have met their Fair Share Goals; now therefore be it RESOLVED: That the following banks are certified by the City Council as having met their 2000 Fair Share Goals: • Bank of America • Bank of the Orient • Community Bank of the Bay • Metropolitan Bank • Union Bank of California • Washington Mutual • Wells Fargo Bank and be it further RESOLVED: That the following banks are not certified by the City Council as having met their 2000 Fair Share Goals: • Bank of Canton of California • Bank of Oakland • Bank of the West • California Bank & Trust • California Federal Bank • California Savings & Loan • Cathay Bank • Citibank Federal Savings Bank • Civic Bank of Commerce • Fireside Thrift Company • First Federal Savings & Loan Association • Gateway Bank • Mechanics Bank • Mission National Bank • Sanwa Bank California • Summit Bank • United Commercial Bank • United Labor Bank • World Savings & Loan • World Savings Bank, F.S.B and be it further RESOLVED: That the City Manager shall file the lists of banks that have met their 2000 Fair Share Goals and those that have not with the City Clerk and with the appropriate federal and state regulatory agencies. IN COUNCIL, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, _______________, 2001 PASSED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES- BRUNNER, CHANG, MAYNE, NADEL, REID, SPEES, WAN AND PRESIDENT DE LA FUENTE NOES- _____ ABSENT- _____ ABSTENTION- _____ ATTEST:___________________________________ CEDA FLOYD City Clerk and Clerk of the Council of the City of Oakland, California .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Stipulation and Consent to Issuance of an Order of Prohibition, Lenard
- I Y I ” .., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before The l OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION In the Matter of ; OTS Order No. SF-97-007 LENARD CAWTA. j Dated: -oh 88. 1997 Former Employee and Institution-Affiliated Party of CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK, A F.S.B.; San Francisco, California. ! I STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER OF PROHIBITION WHEREAS, the Office of Thrift Supervision ("OTS"), based upon information derived from the exercise of its regulatory responsibilities, has informed Lenard Canta ("CAWTA"), a former employee and institution-affiliated party of California Federal Bank, a F.S.B. ("CalFed" or "the Association"), OTS No. 5099, that the OTS is of the opinion that the grounds exist to initiate an administrative prohibition proceeding against CAWTA pursuant to 12 U.S.C. B 1818(e)'; and WHEREAS, CAWTA desires to cooperate with the OTS to avoid the time and expense of such administrative litigation and, without admitting or denying that such grounds exist, but admitting the statements and conclusions in Paragraph 1 below, hereby stipulates and agrees to the following terms: 'All references in this Stipulation and Consent and the Order of Prohibition to the U.S.C. are as amended. - _I 1. Jurisdiction. l (a) CalFed, at all times relevant hereto, was a "savings association" within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. § 1813(b) and Section 2(4) of the Home Owners' Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. 0 1462(4). Accordingly, CalFed is an "insured depository institution" as that term is defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(c). (b) CANTA, as a former employee of CalFed, isdeemed to be an "institution-affiliated party" as that term is defined in (12 U.S.C.
[Show full text]
Cra Ratings of Massachusetts Banks, Credit Unions, and Licensed Mortgage Lenders in 2016
CRA RATINGS OF MASSACHUSETTS BANKS, CREDIT UNIONS, AND LICENSED MORTGAGE LENDERS IN 2016 MAHA's Twenty-Sixth Annual Report on How Well Lenders and Regulators Are Meeting Their Obligations Under the Community Reinvestment Act Prepared for the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance 1803 Dorchester Avenue Dorchester MA 02124 mahahome.org by Jim Campen Professor Emeritus of Economics University of Massachusetts/Boston [email protected] January 2017 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF MAJOR FINDINGS Since 1990, state and federal bank regulators have been required to make public their ratings of the performance of individual banks in serving the credit needs of local communities, in accordance with the provisions of the federal Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and its Massachusetts counterpart. And since 1991, the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance (MAHA) has issued annual reports offering a comprehensive listing and analysis of all CRA ratings of Massachusetts banks and credit unions. This is the twenty-sixth report in this annual series. Since 2011 these reports have also included information on the CRA-like ratings of licensed mortgage lenders issued by the state’s Division of Banks in accordance with its CRA for Mortgage Lenders regulation. As defined for this report, there were 153 “Massachusetts banks” as of December 31, 2016. This includes not only 131 banks that have headquarters in the state, but also 22 banks based elsewhere that have one or more branch offices in Massachusetts.1 Table A-1 provides a listing of the 153 Massachusetts
[Show full text]
OCC, Report of the Ombudsman (2005-2006)
Appendix A OCC Formal Enforcement Actions in the Consumer Protection Area 2009: • Florida Capital Bank, N.A., Jacksonville, Florida (formal agreement – March 26, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations. • National Bank of Arkansas, North Little Rock, Arkansas (formal agreement – March 30, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations. • Merchants Bank of California N.A., Carson, California (formal agreement – March 31, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve its information security program and to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations. • Ozark Heritage Bank, N.A., Mountain View, Arkansas (operating agreement – Apr. 10, 2009). We required the bank to adopt and ensure adherence to a written consumer compliance program. • Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Hatton, Hatton, North Dakota (formal agreement – May 11, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations. • Stone County National Bank, Crane, Missouri (formal agreement – June 25, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations and to strengthen internal controls to improve its information security program. • Union National Community Bank, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (formal agreement – Aug. 27, 2009). We required the bank to strengthen internal controls to improve compliance with applicable consumer laws and regulations. 2008: • Crown Bank N.A., Ocean City, New Jersey (consent order – Feb. 19, 2008). We required the bank to pay a civil money penalty of $7,500 for violations of HMDA and its implementing regulation.
[Show full text]
2016 National Interagency Community Reinvestment Conference
February 7-10, 2016 Los Angeles, CA Sponsored by Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Ofﬁce of the Comptroller of the Currency Community Development Financial Institutions Fund JW Marriott at L.A. Live 900 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90015 213-765-8600 Conference Registration Diamond Ballroom Plaza To Conference Ballrooms Ź Studio 3 Atrium Platinum Ballroom Olympic Studios 1, 2 Gold Ballroom 2 elcome to the 2016 National Interagency Community Reinvestment Conference and [V3VZ(UNLSLZHJP[`[OH[L_LTWSPÄLZIV[O[OLJOHSSLUNLZHUKVWWVY[\UP[PLZMHJPUN[OL Wcommunity development sector. Economic opportunity does not happen in a vacuum: it takes a coordinated approach to housing, LK\JH[PVUW\ISPJZHML[`OLHS[OJHYL[YHUZWVY[H[PVUHUKQVIZ6]LY[OLUL_[[OYLLKH`Z^L^PSS L_WSVYL[OLWH[O^H`Z[VVWWVY[\UP[`[OH[JHUJYLH[L]PIYHU[ULPNOIVYOVVKZMVYHSS(TLYPJHUZ >OL[OLY`V\»YLHIHURLYKL]LSVWLYVYJVTT\UP[`SLHKLY^LOVWL`V\^PSS[HRLM\SSHK]HU[HNLVM [OLSLHYUPUNHUKUL[^VYRPUNVWWVY[\UP[PLZ[OPZJVUMLYLUJLVMMLYZ;OLCRA Compliance track features an interagency team of top examiners from around the country. Sessions in this track cover virtually L]LY`HZWLJ[VM[OL*9(L_HTPUH[PVUWYVJLZZMVYHSSPUZ[P[\[PVUZPaLZHUKPUJS\KLILZ[WYHJ[PJLZ[OH[ L]LU[OLTVZ[L_WLYPLUJLK*9(VMÄJLYZ^PSSÄUK\ZLM\S ;OLZLZZPVUZPU[OLCommunity Development Policy and Practice trackOPNOSPNO[PUUV]H[P]LÄUHUJPUN Z[Y\J[\YLZZ[YH[LNPLZHUKWHY[ULYZOPWTVKLSZHPTLKH[I\PSKPUNWH[O^H`Z[VLJVUVTPJVWWVY[\UP[` PUSV^LYPUJVTLJVTT\UP[PLZ-VY^L»]LHKKLKHZLYPLZVM^VYRZOVWZLZZPVUZKLZPNULK[VIL ZRPSSI\PSKPUNVWWVY[\UP[PLZMVYWHY[PJPWHU[Z
[Show full text]
US Accounts in 24 Hours
U.S. Accounts In 24 Hours - eBook Thank you for purchasing our featured "U.S. Accounts In 24 Hours" eBook / Online Information Packet offered at our web site, U.S. Account Setup.com Within our featured online information packet, you will find all of the resources, tools, information, and contacts you'll need to quickly & easily open a NON-U.S. Resident Bank Account within 24 hours. You'll find lists of U.S. Banks, Account Application Forms, Information on how to obtain a U.S. Mailing Address, plus so much more. Just point and click your way through our Online Information Packet using the links above. If you should have any questions or experience any difficulties in opening your Non-U.S. Resident Account, please feel free to email us at any time, and one of our representatives will get back with you promptly. For Support, Email: [email protected] Homepage: www.usaccountsetup.com Application Forms UPDATE - E-TRADE'S NEW ACCOUNT OPENING POLICIES Etrade is changed the rules in which they open International Banking/ Brokerage accounts for foreigners. They now require all new applications be submitted to the local branch office in your region. Once account is opened, you will be able to use it as a U.S. Bank/Brokerage Account out of your home country. Below, you will find a list of International Etrade Phone Numbers & Addresses. Contact the etrade office that best reflects where you reside or would like your account based out of and where you would like to receive your debit card. U.S.
[Show full text]
EMS Counterparty Spreadsheet Master
1 ECHO MONITORING SOLUTIONS COUNTERPARTY RATINGS REPORT Updated as of October 24, 2012 S&P Moody's Fitch DBRS Counterparty LT Local Sr. Unsecured Sr. Unsecured Sr. Unsecured ABN AMRO Bank N.V. A+ A2 A+ Agfirst Farm Credit Bank AA- AIG Financial Products Corp A- WR Aig-fp Matched Funding A- Baa1 Allied Irish Banks PLC BB Ba3 BBB BBBL AMBAC Assurance Corporation NR WR NR American International Group Inc. (AIG) A- Baa1 BBB American National Bank and Trust Co. of Chicago (see JP Morgan Chase Bank) Assured Guaranty Ltd. (U.S.) A- Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. AA- Aa3 *- NR Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited AA- Aa2 AA- AA Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. BBB- Baa3 *- BBB+ A Banco de Chile A+ NR NR Banco Santander SA (Spain) BBB (P)Baa2 *- BBB+ A Banco Santander Chile A Aa3 *- A+ Bank of America Corporation A- Baa2 A A Bank of America, NA AA3AAH Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co NA/The AA- AA Bank of North Dakota/The AA- A1 Bank of Scotland PLC (London) A A2 A AAL Bank of the West/San Francisco CA A Bank Millennium SA BBpi Bank of Montreal A+ Aa2 AA- AA Bank of New York Mellon/The (U.S.) AA- Aa1 AA- AA Bank of Nova Scotia (Canada) AA- Aa1 AA- AA Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubish UFJ Ltd A+ Aa3 A- A Bank One( See JP Morgan Chase Bank) Bankers Trust Company (see Deutsche Bank AG) Banknorth, NA (See TD Bank NA) Barclays Bank PLC A+ A2 A AA BASF SE A+ A1 A+ Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG (See UniCredit Bank AG) Bayerische Landesbank (parent) NR Baa1 A+ Bear Stearns Capital Markets Inc (See JP Morgan Chase Bank) NR NR NR Bear Stearns Companies, Inc.
[Show full text]
Citigroup Inc. 10-Q 3Rd Quarter 2002
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to _______ Commission file number 1-9924 Citigroup Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 52-1568099 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (212) 559-1000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: Common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2002: 5,056,767,896 Available on the Web at www.citigroup.com Citigroup Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I − Financial Information Item 1. Financial Statements: Page No. Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) − Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 47 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position − September 30, 2002 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2001 48 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) − Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 49 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) − Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 50 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 51 Item 2.
[Show full text]
Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zoob Rood Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 7*4-3271
INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lackingfrom the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a iBrge round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image o f the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a smalt overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding o f the dissertation.
[Show full text]
Dawn Haghighi Nomination Page 1 of 10 Nomination for “Outstanding
Nomination For “Outstanding Committee Member of The Year” Is awarded for individual excellence, leadership and major contributions made by a member of an ACC Committee. General Requirements: Eligibility for this award is restricted to current ACC members in good standing who are members of an ACC Committee. Nominees are considered for their committee leadership positions, their contributions to the committee, ACC and the legal profession generally, especially in-house practice. Contributions to the community at large through volunteer work or pro bono activities may also be considered. Please attach additional sheets, as necessary and return your nomination to ACC (attn: Victor Morales at [email protected]). I, Raghu Nandan, hereby nominate the following ACC Member for “Outstanding Committee Member of the Year.” Nominee: Dawn Haghighi Nominee's Company: PCV Murcor Committee Affiliation: Real Estate Committee Please provide a brief summary of the nominee’s leadership role(s) and contributions to the above committee: Please tell us about the nominee’s contributions to ACC (e.g., CLE programs, ACC publications, membership outreach/development, etc.), the legal profession generally and in-house practice specifically (including through other bar association activities which promote the expertise of in-house counsel). Please comment on any community service or pro bono activities on the part of the nominee or any other factors, which you would like to be considered. NOTE: A bio and headshot of winner will be required within two-weeks after selection has been made. Dawn Haghighi Nomination Page 1 of 10 NOMINATION FOR JONATHAN A. SILBER OUTSTANDING COMMITTEE MEMBER OF THE YEAR AWARD As the Vice-Chair of ACC’s Real Estate Committee, I am pleased to nominate Dawn Haghighi, General Counsel of Affiliate Companies PCV Murcor Real Estate Services (Los Angeles), Hightide Settlement Services (Anaheim), and VRM Mortgage Services (Dallas) for the 2017 Jonathan A.
[Show full text]
Patdiam Jewellery Limited
Prospectus Dated: September 23, 2015 Please read Section 26 of the Companies Act, 2013 100% Fixed Price Issue Patdiam Jewellery Limited Our Company was incorporated as “Patdiam Jewellery Private Limited” in Mumbai under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 vide Certificate of Incorporation dated June 25, 1999 bearing Registration No. 120537 issued by Registrar of Companies, Maharashtra, Mumbai. Subsequently our Company was converted into a public limited company vide fresh Certificate of Incorporation dated September 7, 2015 and the name of our Company was changed to “Patdiam Jewellery Limited”. The Corporate Identity Number of our Company is U36911MH1999PLC120537. For further details of incorporation, change of name and registered office of our Company, please refer to chapter titled ‘General Information’ and ‘Our History and Certain Other Corporate Matters’ beginning on page 59 and 156 respectively of this Prospectus. Registered Office: Unit No 102, Tower No 1, SEEPZ, Andheri (East), Mumbai- 400 096, Maharashtra Tel. No.: +91 - 22 - 2829 3455; Fax No.: +91 - 22 - 2829 3459 Company Secretary and Compliance Officer : Tejas Doshi Email: [email protected] ; Website: www.patdiam.com PROMOTERS OF OUR COMPANY: SAMIR KAKADIA, PRAVIN KAKADIA, CHHAGAN NAVADIA AND MAHESH NAVADIA THE ISSUE PUBLIC ISSUE OF 13,17,000 EQUITY SHARES OF FACE VALUE OF RS. 10 EACH (“EQUITY SHARES”) OF PATDIAM JEWELLERY LIMITED (THE “COMPANY” OR THE “ISSUER”) FOR CASH AT A PRICE OF RS. 38 PER EQUITY SHARE, INCLUDING A SHARE PREMIUM OF RS. 28 PER EQUITY SHARE (THE “ISSUE PRICE”), AGGREGATING RS. 500.46 LACS (“THE ISSUE”), OF WHICH 69,000 EQUITY SHARES OF FACE VALUE OF RS.
[Show full text]
Liquidity from Two Lending Facilities
Liquidity from Two Lending Facilities Sriya Anbil Angela Vossmeyer Federal Reserve Board∗ Claremont McKenna Collegey August 10, 2017 Abstract During financial crises, the Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) uses lending facilities to inject critical funding into the banking sector. An important obstacle for policymakers is designing the facility so that banks are not reluctant to approach due to stigma, and attracting banks with liquidity concerns rather than those prone to risk-taking and moral hazard incentives. We use an unexpected disclosure that introduced stigma at one of two similar LOLRs during the Great Depression to evaluate whether or not banks used LOLR assistance to improve their liquidity needs using a novel trivariate model with recursive endogeneity. We find evidence that banks that approached the facility with stigma were less liquid and reduced their position of safe assets in comparison with banks that approached the facility with no stigma. Thus, stigma forced the pool of LOLR borrowers to separate into different groups of banks that ex-post revealed their liquidity preferences to policymakers. This finding informs policymakers' ex-ante decision of designing a facility that only attracts banks with liquidity concerns. 1 Introduction During the recent financial crisis, the Federal Reserve (Fed) acted as the Lender of Last Resort (LOLR) to inject critical liquidity into the banking sector through its main emergency lending facility, the discount window (Armantier et al., 2015). The discount window was designed to alleviate funding stresses in the banking sector, thereby lessening a \credit crunch" to the real economy. However, banks were reluctant to borrow from the Federal Reserve's discount window because, if it somehow became known, would lead market participants to infer weakness { the so- called stigma problem (Bernanke, 2009).
[Show full text]
A Black Swan in the Money Market
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES A Black Swan in the Money Market John B. Taylor Stanford University John C. Williams Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco April 2008 Working Paper 2008-04 http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/papers/2008/wp08-04bk.pdf The views in this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. A Black Swan in the Money Market* John B. Taylor Stanford University John C. Williams Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco First Version: February 21, 2008 Updated: April 2, 2008 ABSTRACT At the center of the financial market crisis of 2007-2008 was a highly unusual jump in spreads between the overnight inter-bank lending rate and term London inter-bank offer rates (Libor). Because many private loans are linked to Libor rates, the sharp increase in these spreads raised the cost of borrowing and interfered with monetary policy. The widening spreads became a major focus of the Federal Reserve, which took several actions—including the introduction of a new term auction facility (TAF)—to reduce them. This paper documents these developments and, using a no-arbitrage model of the term structure, tests various explanations, including increased risk and greater liquidity demands, while controlling for expectations of future interest rates. We show that increased counterparty risk between banks contributed to the rise in spreads and find no empirical evidence that the TAF has reduced spreads.
[Show full text]