DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Statement: Piute Fire Restoration Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Statement: Piute Fire Restoration Project United States Department of Final Environmental Impact Agriculture Statement Forest Service Pacific Piute Fire Restoration Project Southwest Region Kern River Ranger District, Sequoia National Forest Sequoia Kern County, California National Forest R5-MB-215 April 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720- 6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Piute Fire Restoration Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Kern County, California Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Tina Terrell Forest Supervisor, Sequoia National Forest For Information Contact: Steve Anderson [email protected] Abstract: This final environmental impact statement (FEIS) discusses the potential significant environmental impacts associated with the Piute Fire Restoration Project on the Kern River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest. In addition to the proposed action, this FEIS includes one action alternative that would avoid or minimize potentially adverse impacts. The purpose of this project is to prevent future high-intensity, stand-replacing wildfires by reducing long-term fuel loading; to recover the economic value of trees killed or severely damaged by the fire; to recruit and retain both short- and long-term large down logs and snag habitat; to revegetate conifer stands and other plant and animal habitats that were burned; to improve long- term soil productivity by repairing roads and establishing effective ground cover in severely burned areas; and to reduce safety hazards to the public and forest workers from falling trees. The no action alternative represents the existing and projected future condition against which the other alternatives are compared. The proposed action would use commercial timber harvest to salvage dead and dying trees, would use mechanical equipment to treat fuels and small dead trees by chipping or masticating, and would plant tree seedlings in treatment areas. Road construction would not be required to implement the proposed action. Existing roads would be used and would require repair to reduce erosion and facilitate treatments and product removal. Alternative C, the noncommercial funding alternative, would be similar to the proposed action but would be implemented without commercial removal of fire-killed trees. Final Environmental Impact Statement Summary Proposed Action The Kern River Ranger District of the Sequoia National Forest proposes to salvage dead and dying trees, treat excess fuels, and plant trees in the Piute Fire Restoration project area. The main actions proposed include: 1. Harvest merchantable dead and dying conifers on approximately 350 acres. 2. Remove hazard trees. Hazard trees are dead trees, or trees that are predicted to die within three years, and live trees that are sufficiently damaged to pose a risk of falling within the next three years. 3. Pile and burn excess fuels. Mechanically treat non-merchantable dead trees by chipping or masticating, or hand treat leaving the residual fuels on site for ground cover (about 1,900 acres). 4. Plant native tree species (about 500 acres). 5. Repair and maintain existing roads. Purpose and Need The purpose and need for this project includes: 1. Reduce the risk of future high-intensity, stand-replacing wildfire by reducing long-term fuel loading to facilitate future fire management activities. 2. Recover the economic value of trees killed or severely damaged by the fire in an expeditious manner for the purposes of reducing the cost of reforestation activities and supplying wood fiber to the American public. 3. Recruit and retain large down logs and snag habitat in the short and long term to provide sufficient burned forest habitat for dependent species. 4. Revegetate conifer stands and other plant and animal habitats that were burned. 5. Improve long-term soil productivity by establishing effective ground cover in severely burned areas, to minimize soil erosion and begin to replace soil organic material. 6. Reduce safety hazards to the public and forest workers from falling trees. Issues Public concerns are conflicts or potential problems that the public believes may occur if the proposed action is implemented. The Forest Service considers these concerns and looks for ways to avoid them. Project design features are practices designed to avoid potential conflicts. If the project cannot be designed to avoid specific potential problems or if there is public controversy regarding the ability of the Forest Service to mitigate these concerns, these potential problems or concerns are carried forward by the interdisciplinary team as “significant” issues. In this case, Sequoia National Forest i Piute Fire Restoration Project the team identified four significant issues: Noise and dust, wildlife and wildlife habitat, fire and fuels, soil and water quality. Alternatives Considered in Detail No Action (Alternative A) Under this alternative, no silvicultural or fuels treatments would take place in the Piute Fire Restoration project area at this time. In addition, no tree planting or hazard tree abatement would occur. Proposed Action (Alternative B) Under this alternative, approximately 350 acres of merchantable dead and dying conifer trees would be salvaged, approximately 1,900 additional acres would be treated to remove excess fuels, and approximately 500 acres would be planted with native seedlings. Noncommercial Funding Alternative (Alternative C) During development of the alternatives, the interdisciplinary team acknowledged comments received by some individuals and special interest groups who oppose any commercial use of National Forest resources. Many had suggestions that were outside the scope of the project or were not useful for meeting the purpose of the project. However, in response to these suggestions, the interdisciplinary team developed a modified alternative that included a 15-inch diameter limit on commercial harvest, a 10-inch diameter limit on fuels treatments, and approximately 8 miles of road closures. The draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) analysis of Alternative C found that there was no commercial value associated with the salvage of dead trees less than the15-inch diameter limit. The alternative was analyzed as having no economic value. Before publication of this FEIS, however, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied the Sierra Forest Legacy’s request for an injunction in SFL v. Rey, with the caveat that all new fuels reduction projects analyze a noncommercial funding alternative. In compliance with this order, Alternative C was clarified as a noncommercial funding alternative. Fuel treatments would be designed and implemented with appropriated funds under this alternative. This alternative would cut, pile and burn trees less than 10 inches d.b.h. to achieve fuel reduction objectives on approximately 1,900 acres. Standing dead trees in the 10- to 15-inch d.b.h. size class that would contribute to an excess of the 10 to 15 tons/acre desired condition for surface fuels in the future, would be piled and burned, masticated or otherwise treated to reduce fuels on the 347 acres proposed for salvage in Alternative B. This design feature would provide extra fuels reduction in the area where there is the highest standing volume of dead trees and therefore the greatest potential future fuel loading. The proposal to decommission approximately 8 miles of roads in this alternative is responsive to the need to reduce soil erosion, improve soil productivity, and public comment requesting that open roads be ii Kern River Ranger District Final Environmental Impact Statement minimized to reduce the need for hazard tree removal and disturbance associated with road reconstruction. Alternatives Considered but Not Given Detailed Study Public comments received in response to the proposed action provided suggestions for alternatives. The Forest Service considered all these alternatives, but did not study all of them in detail. Reasons for excluding proposed alternatives from detailed study include: proposed activities do not meet the purpose and need for the project; suggestions are outside the scope of the project intent; suggested alternatives are duplicative of the alternatives considered in detail; alternatives contain components that are not technically or economically feasible; or proposed alternatives are so lacking in detail as to be purely speculative. The following alternatives were considered, but not given detailed study: Effective Restoration, True Restoration, Diameter Limit, 2001 Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment, and Minimize Impacts. Affected Environment The 37,000-acre Piute Fire area is located in the Piute Mountains, approximately
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest, an Assessment of Fuels And
    2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest An Assessment of Fuels and Fire Behavior July 24, 2017 Prepared by: Fire Behavior Assessment Team (FBAT) Alicia Reiner, Enterprise Program, [email protected], Jennifer Anderson, Pacific Southwest Region Carol Ewell, Stanislaus National Forest Amy Ziegler, Six Rivers National Forest Summit Wildland Fire Module, Stanislaus National Forest Sequoia Wildland Fire Module, Sequoia National Forest Acknowledgements: We thank the people who dedicate their energy and careers to land and fire management with the Forest Service and other agencies. The firefighters FBAT has had the opportunity to work with on this assignment and others, not only inspire us to continue navigating the difficulties inherent to keeping FBAT operational, but also give us hope that our land management agencies and fire organizations will continue to improve and provide high quality land and fire management into the future. We thank the CA Central Coast Incident Management Team for supporting FBAT logistically and allowing us to accomplish monitoring work on this fire. We thank the Division Supervisors and other resources we worked with for working with us to access portions of the fire safely. We thank the Sequoia National Forest and Kern River Ranger District, for welcoming FBAT to their unit. A final thanks is to all members and supporters of FBAT, current and past, who have made this program, and the learning which comes from it, possible. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fire Policy: Change Conventional Thinking of Smoke Management to Prioritize Long-Term Air Quality and Public Health
    Author's personal copy Air Qual Atmos Health DOI 10.1007/s11869-016-0405-4 Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health D. W. Schweizer1 & R. Cisneros1 Received: 31 January 2016 /Accepted: 13 April 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Wildland fire smoke is inevitable. Size and intensity Keywords Widland fire . Air quality . Policy . Public health . of wildland fires are increasing in the western USA. Smoke-free Smoke management skies and public exposure to wildland fire smoke have effective- ly been postponed through suppression. The historic policy of suppression has systematically both instilled a public expecta- Wildland fire has long been understood to perform many ben- tion of a smoke-free environment and deferred emissions eficial ecosystem functions (Kilgore 1981; Stevens et al. through increased forest fuel loads that will lead to an eventual 2014) including helping to maximize carbon sequestration in large spontaneous release. High intensity fire smoke is fire-prone areas (Hurteau et al. 2008). Recurring lower inten- impacting a larger area including high density urban areas. sity wildland fire additionally limits fire spread, reduces fire Policy change has largely attempted to provide the avenue for progression (Parks et al. 2015), and may provide an avenue to increased use of ecologically beneficial fire but allows for control high-severity emissions of smoke (Steel et al. 2015), continued reliance on suppression as a primary tool for a smoke localizing the subsequent health impacts, decreasing exposure averse population. While understanding the essential role of and population at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1
    Fire Management Lessons Learned Evolving Fire Management Programs on the George Washington and Jefferson National Forests of Virginia, West Virginia, and Kentucky and Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument of California Prepared for U.S. Forest Service Washington Office and Wildland Fire Lessons Learned Center By Carol Ewell and David Kerr, with contributions by Scott Williams – Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team (AMSET) and Frankie Romero and Tim Sexton – U.S. Forest Service November 2013 Fire Management Lessons Learned – Evolving Fire Management Programs 1 Contents Executive Summary…………………………………….………... 3 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 2. George Washington and Jefferson National Forests……………………………………… 7 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 7 Theme 2: Safety……………………………………………………………………………………..… 19 Theme 3: Economics……………………………………………………………………………..…. 21 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling…………………….…….. 22 3. Sequoia National Forest and Giant Sequoia National Monument…………..……… 29 Theme 1: Organizational Culture……………………………………………………………… 29 Theme 2: Safety………………………………………………………………………………..……… 40 Theme 3: Economics…………………………………………………………………………..……. 40 Theme 4: Natural Resource Effects and Data Modeling………………………..….. 43 4. National Goals Tie Ecosystem Restoration Together with Fire and Fuel Management…………………………………………………………..………. 47 5. Lessons Learned…………………………………………………………………………………..……….. 48 6. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………..…….……. 51 7. References……………………………………………………………………………………………..…….
    [Show full text]
  • How Prior Fuel Break Implementation and Interagency Cooperation Saved Homes and Protected Lives from California’S Bull Fire
    When the Bull Fire made its run toward the Burma Road community area (yellow arrows show fire spread), the 35-acre Burma Unit of the Burma Road Extension Hazardous Fuels Reduction Project helped firefighters prevent the fire from spreading into the northwest corner of the Kernville Success Story: community. How Prior Fuel Break Implementation and Interagency Cooperation Saved Homes and Protected Lives from California’s Bull Fire October 2010 Success Story: How Prior Fuel Break Implementation and Interagency Cooperation Saved Homes and Protected Lives from California’s Bull Fire 1 The Burma Road ‘shaded’ fuel break was designed for a wildfire outbreak such as the Bull Fire that broke out on Monday July 26, 2010. “ The concept was to provide defensible space for firefighters to work safely in. We knew it was just a matter of time before down-drainage winds pushed a fire from the Bull Run Creek area toward this neighborhood. The network of fuel breaks built in the Kernville area by the Kern County Fire Department, sponsored by the Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council, are a good investment in community protection. Many home owners have been doing a good job of improving defensible space in their yards along Burma Road for several years now. That really helps. Scott Williams, ” Fire Management Specialist, U.S. Forest Service, Adaptive Management Services Enterprise Team – AMSET Contents I. The Treatment on the Land – Before the Fire A. Longtime Interagency Collaborative Effort—Involving Local Organizations and Federal Land Agencies—Achieves and Assures Hazardous Fuel Reduction……………………………………….…………………………………… 7 B. Kernville Interagency Fuel Treatment Projects Map……………………………………… 8 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Forest Legacy and Coalition Comments on Rim Fire Recovery
    January 6, 2014 Susan Skalski Forest Supervisor Stanislaus National Forest 19777 Greenley Road Sonora, CA 95370 Sent to: [email protected] Re: Scoping comments for Rim Fire Recovery (43033) Project Dear Ms. Skalski: These comments are submitted on behalf of Sierra Forest Legacy and ten other conservation organizations. We have reviewed the scoping notice and accompanying maps. Below we identify a number of issues and concerns about the proposed action. We ask that you address these in the draft environmental impact statement for the Rim Fire Recovery project. I. Overview The Rim Fire was an extraordinary event that occurred over several weeks beginning in August 2013. Ultimately, the fire area encompassed over 257,000 acres of public and private land and spanned elevations ranging from 1,900 feet to over 7,300 feet. A wide range of plant communities and wildlife habitats were affected by the wildfire and the fire effects on these resources were highly variable. A significant portion of the fire area had been burned and re- burned within the past 30 years with substantial areas on national forest and private lands being planted and re-planted with tree farms. The Rim Fire itself was a combination of unintentionally lit wildfire and intentionally lit fire intended to control the approaching wildfire. Because of this variability in the project landscape, the post-wildfire landscape presents a variety of challenges and opportunities. The science of post-fire management must be applied to future actions in the Rim Fire area. Since adoption of the most recent forest plan amendment in 2004, new perspectives on salvage logging, including harm to ecosystem function from its application and its relationship to ecological restoration, has been discussed at length in the forest ecology and conservation biology literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment
    United States Department of Giant Sequoia Agriculture Forest Service National Monument Giant Sequoia National Monument Draft Environmental Impact Statement August 2010 Volume 1 The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Chapter 3 - Affected Environment Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 1 Chapter 3 Affected Environment Volume 1 Giant Sequoia National Monument, Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2 Chapter 3 Affected Environment Chapter 3 Affected Environment Chapter 3 describes the affected environment or existing condition by resource area, as each is currently managed. This is the baseline condition against which environmental effects are evaluated and from which progress toward the desired condition can be measured. Vegetation, including Giant Sequoia Groves Vegetation within the Giant Sequoia National Monument can be grouped into ecological units with similar climatic, geology, soils, and vegetation communities. These units fall within three categories: oak woodlands/grasslands, shrublands/chaparral, and forestlands. The forested category between 5,000 and 7,000 feet in elevation, spanning the Monument from north to south, is dominated by mixed conifer and its variants.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest and Wildland Fire Science Synthesis: Sierra Nevada
    14 April 2015 Forest and Wildland Fire Science Synthesis SUMMARY: There is a substantial disconnect between what the public believes about fire in our forests and the current state of scientific knowledge. Contrary to common assumptions: A) mixed-intensity fire was the dominant fire regime historically in mixed-conifer and ponderosa pine forests; B) current fires are mostly low- and moderate-intensity, and fire intensity is not increasing currently in the great majority of western U.S. forests; C) high-intensity fire patches (wherein most or all trees are killed), both small and large, were a substantial component of natural fire regimes in these forests historically, and many wildlife species have evolved over millennia to depend upon the habitat created by such fire; D) high-intensity fire patches, especially larger patches, create “snag forest habitat”, which is rarer than old-growth forest and often has the highest biodiversity of any forest type; it is rich in habitat structures, including “snags” (standing dead trees), which provide homes for cavity-nesting birds and food for woodpeckers (which feed on the larvae of native beetles, which depend upon snags), downed logs (good habitat for small mammals, reptiles, and salamanders), dense pockets of natural conifer regeneration (habitat for mammals and birds), and flowering shrubs that germinate after fire, attracting native flying insects, which in turn provide food for both birds and bats; E) there is substantially less high-intensity fire now than there was historically, prior to fire suppression policies, and this post-fire habitat deficit is worsened by extensive post-fire clearcutting on national forests and private lands, and by landscape-level mechanical “thinning” designed to further suppress fire, making snag forest habitat the most endangered forest habitat type in the U.S.; F) wildlife species that depend upon snag forest habitat, like the Black-backed Woodpecker and Buff-breasted Flycatcher, are threatened with extinction in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Biological Assessment
    Giant Sequoia National Monument Specialist Report Signature: __________________________________________ Date: _______________________________________________ The U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents WILDLIFE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 3 CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION 6 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 13 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 15 Analysis Assumptions and Methodology 15 California Condor-Effects 16 Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle-Effects 21 Little Kern Golden Trout-Effects 27 LITERATURE CITED AND REFERENCES 32 APPENDIX A-SPECIES ELIMINATED FROM 40 DETAILED ANALYSIS Wildlife Biological Assessment GSNM Specialist Report Wildlife Biological Assessment Summary DRAFT WILDLIFE BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Giant Sequoia National Monument Management Plan Fresno, Tulare and Kern Counties Sequoia
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-04-705 Wildland Fires
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Requesters June 2004 WILDLAND FIRES Forest Service and BLM Need Better Information and a Systematic Approach for Assessing the Risks of Environmental Effects a GAO-04-705 June 2004 WILDLAND FIRES Forest Service and BLM Need Better Highlights of GAO-04-705, a report to Information and a Systematic Approach congressional requesters for Assessing the Risks of Environmental Effects Decades of fire suppression, as Wildland fires can have dramatic effects on environmental resources and well as changing land management ecosystems, including production of large amounts of smoke, loss of trees, practices, have caused vegetation and erosion of soil into streams and lakes. However, fires can also benefit to accumulate and become altered resources by recycling soil nutrients, renewing vegetation growth, and on federal lands. Concerns about adding gravel to streams, which improves spawning habitat for fish. The 20 the effects of wildland fires have wildland fires that we surveyed burned over 158,000 acres of federal land increased efforts to reduce fuels on federal lands. These efforts also and had complex, wide-ranging, and sometimes contradictory, effects on have environmental effects. The both individual resources, such as trees and streams, and ecosystems. For requesters asked GAO to example, the short-term effects of the Missionary Ridge fire in Colorado that (1) describe effects from fires on burned almost 50,000 acres of trees and other vegetation included increased the environment, (2) assess the debris and sediment that affected water quality in some areas. However, in information gathered by the Forest other areas, officials said even dramatic changes to streams would not be Service and Bureau of Land detrimental in the long term.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Late Quaternary Active Kern Canyon and Breckenridge Faults, Southern Sierra Nevada, California
    Origin and Evolution of the Sierra Nevada and Walker Lane themed issue Map of the late Quaternary active Kern Canyon and Breckenridge faults, southern Sierra Nevada, California C.C. Brossy1,*, K.I. Kelson1, C.B. Amos2, J.N. Baldwin1,†, B. Kozlowicz3, D. Simpson3, M.G. Ticci1, A.T. Lutz1,†, O. Kozaci1, A. Streig4, R. Turner1, and R. Rose5 1Fugro Consultants, Inc., 1777 Botelho Drive, Walnut Creek, California 94596, USA 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA 3URS Corporation, 1333 Broadway, Oakland, California 94104, USA 4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA 5U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Dam Safety Assurance Program, Sacramento, California 95814, USA ABSTRACT plate is bounded by the San Andreas transform deforming the southern Sierran microplate system on the west and the eastern California (Amos et al., 2010; Nadin and Saleeby, 2010). Surface traces of the Quaternary active shear zone–Walker Lane belt on the east (Fig. 1). Specifi cally, we present map-based evidence of Kern Canyon and Breckenridge faults were Relative to stable North America, the Sierran late Quaternary activity on the Kern Canyon and mapped via aerial reconnaissance, analy- microplate moves northwest (Savage et al., Breckenridge faults, between Harrison Pass on sis of light detection and ranging (LiDAR) 1990; Sauber et al., 1994; Argus and Gordon, the north and Walker Basin on the south (Fig. 2). elevation data, review and interpretation of 1991, 2001) within a broad zone of deforma- aerial photography, fi eld reconnaissance, tion between the Pacifi c plate and North Amer- Regional Geologic and and detailed fi eld mapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide Geology and Mining History of the Kern
    FIELD GUIDE GEOLOGY AND MINING HISTORY OF THE KERN CANYON, LAKE ISABELLA AND WALKER BASIN, KERN COUNTY CALIFORNIA Gregg Wilkerson 2017 1 Acknowledgements This field guide is adapted from field guides produced by the Buena Vista Museum of Natural History and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management from 1993 through 2003. Almost all of the mine descriptions in this field guide are adapted from those found in the Troxell and Morton (1968) report on the “Mines and Mineral Resources of Kern County.” Field Trip Overview This field trip leaves the Coseree's Deli parking lot at 8:15 a.m. We then take High- way 178 up through the Kern Canyon to Lake Isabella. After visiting sites around the lake we take the Havilah-Bodfish road south toward Walker Basin. We visit the museum in Havilah and return to Bakersfield through Twin Oaks on Caliente Creek. Participants should all bring water and a sack lunch. Contents ROAD LOGS.......................................................5 PART 1: BAKERSFIELD TO LAKE ISABELLA............................5 AREA MAP 01................................................5 AREA MAP 02...............................................11 AREA MAP 03...............................................15 WATER DISTRIBUTION OF KERN RIVER.....................15 STOP NO. 1. MOUTH OF KERN CANYON: PG&E POWER HOUSE...........................................17 GOLD IN KERN COUNTY..................................22 AREA MAP 04...............................................28 STOP NO. 2: RICHBAR HYDRAULIC MINING.................31 AREA MAP 05...............................................34
    [Show full text]