DOCSLIB.ORG

Sequoia Crest Final CWPP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sequoia Crest Final CWPP SEQUOIA CREST COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN ALDER CREEK FIRE SAFE COUNCIL KERN RIVER VALLEY FIRE SAFE COUNCIL KENNETH DELFINO Registered Professional Forester # 506 January 2008 SEQUOIA CREST Community Wildfire Protection Plan Certification and Agreement The Community Wildfire Protection Plan for Sequoia Crest • Was collaboratively developed with the Sequoia Crest Property Owners Association, Alder creek Fire Safe Council, Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council, USDA Forest Service, Tulare County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. • The plan provides an analysis of the fire/fuel situation in the community, community attitudes toward wildland fire, and information on the fire safe condition of 101 properties. • The plan identifies fuel reduction projects for Sequoia Crest. • The plan provides recommendations on increasing information and communication on wildland fire issues and problems. • The plan recommends that the most effective fire defenses are the actions of the residents of the community to improve the survivability of their properties. The following entities attest that the standards listed above have been met and mutually agree with the contents of this Community Wildfire Protection Plan. _________________________ __________________________ Edward Royce, President Harry Love, President Kern River Valley Fire Safe Council Alder Creek Fire Safe Council _________________________ ___________________________ Ed Wristen, Unit Chief, Priscilla Summers, District Ranger Tulare Unit Tule River Ranger District California Department of Forestry Sequoia National Forest and Fire Protection ________________________ Steve Sunderland, Chief Tulare County Fire Department 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary............................................................................................ 5 Sequoia Crest Recommendations................................................................... 10 Overview of Project Area History and Setting of Sequoia Crest................................................... 14 Fire Protection Resources………………………………………………………… 18 Tulare County……………………………………………………………….. 21 California Department of Forestry and Fire Prot……………………… 23 Forest Service………………………………………………….................... 24 Mutual Aid………………………………………………………................... 26 Self Protection………………………………………………………………. 27 Wildland Fire Fundamentals……………………………………………………… 30 Fire Environment and Fire History of Sequoia Crest ………………………... 31 Vegetation …………………………………………………………………… 31 Fuels ………………………………………………………………………….. 34 Topography …………………………………………………………………. 39 Weather ………………………………………………………………………. 40 Fire Behavior ………………………………………………………………... 40 Fire History ………………………………………………………………….. 40 Fire Behavior ………………………………………………………………………... 41 Topography ……………………………………………………. …………... 41 Weather ………………………………………………………………………. 44 Fuel …………………………………………………………………………… 45 Extreme Fire Behavior Conditions ……………………………………… 47 Fire Danger Rating System ………………………………………………. 48 Evaluation of Structures ………………………………………………………….. 50 Evacuation Plan ……………………………………………………………………. 70 Protect Your Property …………………………………………………………….. 73 When a Fire Approaches …………………………………………………………. 85 Purpose of the Project ……………………………………………………………. 87 Request for Proposal ………………………………………………..................... 88 3 Submitted Proposal ……………………………………………………………….. 88 Project Tasks …………………………………………………………. …………… 89 Prospect for Future Success …………………………………………………….. 90 Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………... 100 About the Author …………………………………………………………………. 100 Literature Cited ……………………………………………………...................... 101 Appendix I, PRC 4291 ……………………………………………....................... 104 Appendix II, LE – 100 …………………………………………………………….. 106 Appendix III, Letter to Property Owners ……………………………………… 107 Appendix IV, Forest Service Evacuation Plan ………………………………. 108 Appendix V, Address Number Order Form ………………………………….. 109 Appendix VI, Property Evaluation Form ……………………………………… 110 Appendix VII, Vegetation Types …………………………………..………….. 111 Appendix VIII, Vegetation Classification ……………………………………... 115 Appendix IX, Fire Fighting Gel …………………………………………………. 116 Appendix X, Fire Protection Agreement, Fire Laws ………………………... 117 Appendix XI, Sequoia Tree Lighting Fire …………………………………….. 119 Map 1, General Location ………………………………………………………….. 8 Map 2, Sequoia Crest Subdivision ……………………………………………… 9 Map 3, Proposed Fuel Break …………………………………………………….. 13 Map 4, Fire History ………………………………………………………………… 94 Map 5, Fuel Types …………………………………………………………………. 96 Map 6, Fuel Type Detail …………………………………………………………... 97 Map 7, Aerial View of Project Area …………………………………….............. 98 Map 8, Aerial View of Project Area ……………………………………………... 99 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sequoia Crest is a rural mountain community of 104 habitable structures located in the Sequoia National Forest in Tulare County, California. Vegetation in this community are typical Southern Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forests at the 6000 to 7000 foot elevation range. Sequoia Crest is a subdivision of 140 acres adjacent to a 540 acre parcel which is a section of land surrounded by the recently created Giant Sequoia National Monument. The most unique feature of this property is the number of Giant Sequoia Redwoods on individual lots and on the adjacent private parcel. Growth of the forest and the lack of natural fire has created a tinder box situation that endangers the community and the Giant Sequoias. Springville, a small foothill town, lies approximately 12 air miles to the west, directly down-canyon from Sequoia Crest and Camp Nelson about 3 air miles south, are both listed as a “communities at risk” from wild land fire. Most recently, the “Deep Fire” burned over 3000 acres between Springville and Sequoia Crest. Aggressive fire fighting and a wind change kept the fire from moving upslope toward Sequoia Crest. In 2002, the “McNally Fire” burned over 150,000 acres and came within 8 air miles of Sequoia Crest. The conditions that supported both of these major fires exist within the Sequoia Crest community. Sequoia Crest, with only 12 full time residents, is about one hour from full shopping services in Porterville. This one hour trip is along the relative twisted and steep Highway 190, past Camp Nelson and about five miles north on Redwood Drive. The community has the normal public utilities including electrical power, telephone and a community owned water system. Tulare County provides garbage service at a central transfer station near Camp Nelson, although it is only open a few days a week. Tulare County maintains all the paved roads and they are snow plowed on a regular schedule during the winter. The nearest fire station is at Camp Nelson, about 20 minutes away. Wildland fire protection is provided by The U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service during the summer months only. Year around structural fire protection is 5 provided by Tulare County (since July 1, 2007). Ambulance service is provided by a volunteer group in Camp Nelson (at the same site as the County fire station). Air ambulance (helicopter) is provided by Hall Ambulance in Bakersfield, 30 minutes away. Law enforcement, Tulare County Sherriff, must come from Porterville, Springville or Camp Nelson, wherever a Deputy is on duty. Wildland fire is the Sword of Damocles hanging over this community. The question is not “if a fire will occur”, but “when it will occur” and “how much damage it will do”. The community is located on a northwest to south aspect with over 100 percent slopes on some lots. Fire history records, kept since 1910, indicate that no recent fires have burned near this community. Fire scars on the old growth Giant Sequoias indicate that this area probably experienced historic and pre-historic natural or indigenous fire at approximately the same frequency as the west slope of the Sierra’s, about a 25 to 40 year frequency. All of the permanent residents and many part-timer owners were interviewed during three visits to the project area and some had a high level of interest and knowledge about wildfire conditions and fire safe principles. Unfortunately many of the part-time owners had minimal understanding, other than the requirement for vegetation clearance protection zones. Many have hazardous conditions that could be easily remedied. Most did not realize that fire protection resources are scarce in this area and that engines and equipment may not be available during the initial stage of a fire. Some thought that fire engines would descend on the area as soon as a fire is reported as they watched on television during Southern California fires. This project involved the evaluation of 101 properties with report prepared for each property (see Appendix VI for a sample of an evaluation report). Those property evaluations have been given to all owners and no copies have been retained. A summary of the conditions found is contained in the section “Evaluation of Structures: Construction and Clearance”. A companion section “Protect Your Property” should also be given to each owner to assist them in improving their chance of survival when a fire occurs. Recommendation #1 describes owners responsibilities. 6 Recommendation #2 describes a fuel reduction project on National Forest land that needs to be installed (map # 3). This fuel break will improve the capability of firefighters to protect developed areas in the community. Recommendation #3 suggests fuel reduction on vacant lots within the community. Vacant lots were not individually evaluated however most have had little
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007
    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest, an Assessment of Fuels And
    2017 Schaeffer Fire Sequoia National Forest An Assessment of Fuels and Fire Behavior July 24, 2017 Prepared by: Fire Behavior Assessment Team (FBAT) Alicia Reiner, Enterprise Program, [email protected], Jennifer Anderson, Pacific Southwest Region Carol Ewell, Stanislaus National Forest Amy Ziegler, Six Rivers National Forest Summit Wildland Fire Module, Stanislaus National Forest Sequoia Wildland Fire Module, Sequoia National Forest Acknowledgements: We thank the people who dedicate their energy and careers to land and fire management with the Forest Service and other agencies. The firefighters FBAT has had the opportunity to work with on this assignment and others, not only inspire us to continue navigating the difficulties inherent to keeping FBAT operational, but also give us hope that our land management agencies and fire organizations will continue to improve and provide high quality land and fire management into the future. We thank the CA Central Coast Incident Management Team for supporting FBAT logistically and allowing us to accomplish monitoring work on this fire. We thank the Division Supervisors and other resources we worked with for working with us to access portions of the fire safely. We thank the Sequoia National Forest and Kern River Ranger District, for welcoming FBAT to their unit. A final thanks is to all members and supporters of FBAT, current and past, who have made this program, and the learning which comes from it, possible. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Interface (WUI) Fires
    NIST Special Publication 1198 Summary of Workshop on Structure Ignition in Wildland- Urban Interface (WUI) Fires Sponsored by ASTM International E05 Committee Samuel L. Manzello Stephen L. Quarles This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 NIST Special Publication 1198 Summary of Workshop on Structure Ignition in Wildland- Urban Interface (WUI) Fires Sponsored by ASTM International E05 Committee Samuel L. Manzello Fire Research Division Engineering Laboratory Stephen L. Quarles Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety Richburg, SC This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce Penny Pritzker, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Willie May, Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology and Director Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. The content of the oral presentations reproduced in this workshop report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent NIST’s perspective. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1198 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1198, 82 pages (September 2015) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1198 Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Workshop Objectives 1 1.2 Program of Workshop 2 1.3 Participant Listing 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Scenic Road Trips Worth the Drive Near Visalia
    Media contact: Suzanne Bianco [email protected] THREE SCENIC DRIVES WORTH THE TRIP THIS SUMMER Visit Visalia’s top picks for road tripping travelers Visalia, Calif. (June 11, 2021) – Visit Visalia is gearing up for an influx of visitors as Covid restrictions are lifted and California opens back up. Anticipating increased summertime travel, Visit Visalia is ready with travel tips and suggestions, and offering their top picks for three scenic drives that will have visitors exploring the local foothills and the national parks in Visalia’s backyard for a classic summer road trip. Road Trip #1: Drive the General’s Highway in Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Park The nearby national parks are filled with scenic vistas and majestic sequoia trees that appear around each turn as you drive through the parks. For travelers who want to see these amazing parks but don't have time for a deep exploration, a road trip through the parks is a great solution. Sequoia and Kings Canyon are two of the most unique in the park system! They are adjacent parks that are linked by the General's Highway which makes for a perfect day drive that spans from the Ash Mountain gate in Sequoia National Park to the Big Stump gate in Kings Canyon. And only one entry fee is required. Road Trip #2: Yokohl Valley to Balch Park and Springville Skirting the southwestern edge of Sequoia National Park (though not accessible), the trip through Yokohl Valley is along the foothills of the Sierra Nevada mountains. This route winds past orange groves, cattle ranches and rolling hills dotted with barns and pastures providing a relaxing drive and lots of photo ops.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management.Indd
    Fire today ManagementVolume 65 • No. 2 • Spring 2005 LLARGEARGE FFIRESIRES OFOF 2002—P2002—PARTART 22 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Erratum In Fire Management Today volume 64(4), the article "A New Tool for Mopup and Other Fire Management Tasks" by Bill Gray shows incorrect telephone and fax numbers on page 47. The correct numbers are 210-614-4080 (tel.) and 210-614-0347 (fax). Fire Management Today is published by the Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the publication of this periodical is necessary in the transaction of the pub- lic business required by law of this Department. Fire Management Today is for sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, at: Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: 202-512-1800 Fax: 202-512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 Fire Management Today is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/fmt/index.html Mike Johanns, Secretary Melissa Frey U.S. Department of Agriculture General Manager Dale Bosworth, Chief Robert H. “Hutch” Brown, Ph.D. Forest Service Managing Editor Tom Harbour, Director Madelyn Dillon Fire and Aviation Management Editor Delvin R. Bunton Issue Coordinator The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communica- tion of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Fire Policy: Change Conventional Thinking of Smoke Management to Prioritize Long-Term Air Quality and Public Health
    Author's personal copy Air Qual Atmos Health DOI 10.1007/s11869-016-0405-4 Forest fire policy: change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health D. W. Schweizer1 & R. Cisneros1 Received: 31 January 2016 /Accepted: 13 April 2016 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Abstract Wildland fire smoke is inevitable. Size and intensity Keywords Widland fire . Air quality . Policy . Public health . of wildland fires are increasing in the western USA. Smoke-free Smoke management skies and public exposure to wildland fire smoke have effective- ly been postponed through suppression. The historic policy of suppression has systematically both instilled a public expecta- Wildland fire has long been understood to perform many ben- tion of a smoke-free environment and deferred emissions eficial ecosystem functions (Kilgore 1981; Stevens et al. through increased forest fuel loads that will lead to an eventual 2014) including helping to maximize carbon sequestration in large spontaneous release. High intensity fire smoke is fire-prone areas (Hurteau et al. 2008). Recurring lower inten- impacting a larger area including high density urban areas. sity wildland fire additionally limits fire spread, reduces fire Policy change has largely attempted to provide the avenue for progression (Parks et al. 2015), and may provide an avenue to increased use of ecologically beneficial fire but allows for control high-severity emissions of smoke (Steel et al. 2015), continued reliance on suppression as a primary tool for a smoke localizing the subsequent health impacts, decreasing exposure averse population. While understanding the essential role of and population at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity
    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
    [Show full text]
  • Caldor Fire Incident Update
    CALDOR FIRE z INCIDENT UPDATE Date: 9/9/2021 Time: 7:00 a.m. Information Line: (530) 303-2455 @CALFIREAEU @CALFIRE_AEU @EldoradoNF Media Line: (530) 806-3212 Incident Websites: www.fire.ca.gov/current_incidents @CALFIREAEU https://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/7801/ @EldoradoNF Email Updates (sign-up): https://tinyurl.com/CaldorEmailList El Dorado County Evacuation Map: https://tinyurl.com/EDSOEvacMap INCIDENT FACTS Incident Start Date: August 14, 2021 Incident Start Time: 6:54 P.M. Incident Type: Wildland Fire Cause: Under Investigation Incident Location: 2 miles east of Omo Ranch, 4 miles south of the community of Grizzly Flats CAL FIRE Unit: Amador – El Dorado AEU Unified Command Agencies: CAL FIRE AEU, USDA Forest Service – Eldorado National Forest Size: 217,946 Containment: 53% Expected Full Containment: September 27, 2021 First Responder Fatalities: 0 First Responder Injuries: 9 Civilian Fatalities: 0 Civilian Injuries: 2 Structures Threatened: 24,647 Structures Damaged: 80 Single Residences Commercial Properties Other Minor Structures 778 18 202 Destroyed: Destroyed: Destroyed: ASSIGNED RESOURCES Engines: 320 Water Tenders: 82 Helicopters: 43 Hand Crews: 59 Dozers: 52 Other: 34 Total Personnel: 4,532 Air Tankers: Numerous firefighting air tankers from throughout the state are flying fire suppression missions as conditions allow. CURRENT SITUATION WEST ZONE The fire continued to be active throughout the night. Minimal growth occurred in the Situation Summary: northeast and southern areas of the fire perimeter. Firefighters worked diligently last night picking up minor spot fires and mitigating threats to structures. Today crews will continue Incident Information: working along the southern edge to secure more control line and keep the fire north of Highway 88.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019
    REVIEW OF CALIFORNIA WILDFIRE EVACUATIONS FROM 2017 TO 2019 STEPHEN WONG, JACQUELYN BROADER, AND SUSAN SHAHEEN, PH.D. MARCH 2020 DOI: 10.7922/G2WW7FVK DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R Wong, Broader, Shaheen 2 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. UC-ITS-2019-19-b N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Review of California Wildfire Evacuations from 2017 to 2019 March 2020 6. Performing Organization Code ITS-Berkeley 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report Stephen D. Wong (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3638-3651), No. Jacquelyn C. Broader (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-955X), N/A Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3350-856X) 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Institute of Transportation Studies, Berkeley N/A 109 McLaughlin Hall, MC1720 11. Contract or Grant No. Berkeley, CA 94720-1720 UC-ITS-2019-19 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period The University of California Institute of Transportation Studies Covered www.ucits.org Final Report 14. Sponsoring Agency Code UC ITS 15. Supplementary Notes DOI: 10.7922/G29G5K2R 16. Abstract Between 2017 and 2019, California experienced a series of devastating wildfires that together led over one million people to be ordered to evacuate. Due to the speed of many of these wildfires, residents across California found themselves in challenging evacuation situations, often at night and with little time to escape. These evacuations placed considerable stress on public resources and infrastructure for both transportation and sheltering.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Impacts of Poorly-Planned Development in San Diego County
    November 13, 2018 Via Electronic Mail and Hand Delivery (with references) San Diego County Board of Supervisors Attn: David Hall Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335 San Diego, CA 92101 [email protected] Re: Wildfire Impacts of Poorly-planned Development in San Diego County Dear Supervisors: These comments are submitted on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center) regarding the approval or pending approval of the following Projects: 1. Warner Ranch 2. Lilac Hills 3. Newland Sierra 4. Valiano 5. Harmony Grove Village South 6. Otay Ranch Village 14, 16, 19 7. Otay Ranch Village 13 8. Otay 250 Sunroad 9. Project Specific Requests (PSRs) While the Center has many concerns regarding the environmental impacts and inadequate analyses provided in the Environmental Impact Reports of the proposed Projects, the purpose of this letter is to voice our concern regarding the public safety impacts of these poorly-planned, sprawl developments in fire-prone chaparral ecosystems in San Diego County. The Center reviewed the Environmental Impact Report of each Project to determine the cumulative impacts of these developments on wildfire risk and analyze the adequacy of proposed mitigation measures. Project footprints were compared to the fire history and fire threat of the region, as identified by state agencies (the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection [Cal Fire] and the California Public Utilities Commission [CPUC]), and the total number of housing units and potential residents for all the developments were calculated. The proposed developments would be placed in natural landscapes dominated by fire- prone native chaparral and coastal sage scrub habitats that rely on wildfires to persist.
    [Show full text]