Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Prepared for:

CVGA Partners, LLC 1209 Santiago Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 Contact: Drew Purvis

Prepared by:

Carlson Strategic Land Solutions 327134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Phone: (949) 542-7042 Contact: Brianna Bernard

September 2018

Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Glossary of Terms ...... iv

1.0 Introduction ...... 1

1.1 Purpose and Approach...... 1 1.2 Project Terms ...... 1 1.3 Project Location ...... 1 1.4 Existing Land Use ...... 2

2.0 Project Description ...... 3

3.0 Regulatory Context ...... 4

3.1 Federal Laws and Regulations...... 4 3.2 California State Laws and Regulations ...... 4 3.3 Local Plans/Regulations ...... 4 3.4 Regulatory Permits...... 4

4.0 Survey and Methods ...... 5

4.1 Literature Review ...... 5 4.1.1 Sensitive Plant Communities ...... 5 4.1.2 Critical Habitat ...... 5 4.1.3 Special Status Plants and Wildlife ...... 6 4.1.4 Jurisdictional Waters ...... 7 4.2 Biological Survey ...... 8 4.2.1 General Biological Survey ...... 8 4.2.2 Tree Survey ...... 8 4.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...... 8

5.0 Results ...... 11

5.1 Vegetation Communities ...... 11 5.1.1 Ornamental ...... 11 5.1.2 Golf Course...... 12 5.1.3 Developed/Disturbed...... 12 5.2 Plants ...... 12 5.3 Critical Habitat ...... 13 5.4 Wildlife ...... 13 5.4.1 Wildlife Species Observed or Detected ...... 15 5.5 Regional Connectivity/Wildlife Movement ...... 15 5.5.1 Wildlife Movement within the Study Area ...... 17

September 2018 i Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

5.6 Jurisdictional Areas ...... 17 5.7 Soils Mapping ...... 17

6.0 Project Impacts ...... 17

6.1 Impacts to Vegetation Communities/Habitats ...... 18 6.2 Potential Impacts to Special Status Plants ...... 19 6.3 Potential Impacts to Critical Habitat ...... 19 6.4 Potential Impacts to Special Status Wildlife ...... 19 6.5 Potential Impacts to Wildlife Movement ...... 21 6.6 Potential Impacts to Jurisdictional Features ...... 21

7.0 BMPs/PDFs Incorporated into the Project and MMRP ...... 22

8.0 Proposed Mitigation ...... 23

8.1 Wildlife Species ...... 23

9.0 Cumulative Impacts ...... 24

10.0 Literature Cited ...... 25

TABLES

Table 1. Vegetation Communities Observed within the Project Site ...... 11 Table 2. Approximate Acreage of Potential Impacts to Vegetation ...... 18 Table 3 Impact Analysis Summary for Special Status Species ...... 19

FIGURES

Figure 1 Regional Map Figure 2 Project Vicinity Map Figure 3 CNDDB Occurrences Figure 4 Critical Habitat Map Figure 5 Vegetation Map Figure 6 Soils Map Figure 7 Vegetation Communities Impacts Map

APPENDICES

Appendix A California Grand Village Arborist Report

Appendix B Representative Photographs of Community Classification

September 2018 ii Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Appendix C Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

Appendix D Plant Species Recorded During the Field Surveys

Appendix E Special Status Wildlife Species Potential Occurrence Determination

September 2018 iii Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY OF TERMS

BLM United States Bureau of Land Management BMPs Best Management Practices CDF California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CESA California Endangered Species Act CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database CNPS California Native Plant Society Corps United States Army Corps of Engineers CRPR California Rare Plant Rank CWA Clean Water Act FESA Federal Endangered Species Act FGC California Fish and Game Code GPS Global Positioning System I-210 Interstate 210 LBV least Bell’s vireo MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MMRP Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program NEPA National Environmental Protection Act NHD National Hydrography Dataset NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPPA Native Plant Protection Act NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWI National Wetlands Inventory OHWM Ordinary High Water Mark Project California Grand Village Senior Village Project RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SAA Section 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement SLS Carlson Strategic Land Solutions SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan U.S. United States USFS United States Forest Service

September 2018 iv Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey WQC Section 401 Water Quality Certification

September 2018 v Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

1.0 Introduction

On behalf of California Grand Village (CGV) team and the California Grand Village Senior Village Project (Project), Carlson Strategic Land Solutions (SLS) has prepared this Biological Technical Report, which incorporates the findings from the field survey conducted by SLS biologist on May 23, 2017 and the Arborist Report performed by Dudek on February 13, 2017 and updated in August 2018 (Appendix A). This report provides a Technical Study for the approximately 19-acre Project site and surrounding 200-foot survey buffer, collectively known as the “Study Area.”

1.1 Purpose and Approach

This report provides a summary of the conditions present during the 2017 survey, an assessment of the potential presence of sensitive biological resources, an analysis of the potential impacts to those resources due to Project implementation, and proposed mitigation. This report describes the current biological resources present within the Study Area including habitat communities, jurisdictional waters, and the potential occurrence of listed and “special status”1 plant and wildlife species. The potential biological significance of site construction and development in view of federal, state, and local laws and regulations are also identified in this report. The report also recommends, as appropriate, Best Management Practices (BMPs) and avoidance and minimization measures to reduce or avoid potential impacts. While general biological resources are discussed, the focus of this assessment is on those resources considered to be sensitive. This report was prepared based upon results of a literature review and field surveys.

1.2 Project Terms

The following terms will be used throughout this document and are defined as follows:

• Project site: the approximately 19-acre California Grand Village Project site.

• Study Area: the area evaluated during the field survey, including the 19-acre Project site and surrounding 200-foot survey buffer area.

• Project Vicinity: intended to be a general term to describe the broader area surrounding the Study Area.

1.3 Project Location

The Project site is located northwest corner of the City of Azusa, Los Angeles County, California. The Project site is currently the Azusa Greens Golf Course, specifically at the locations of golf holes 3, 4, 5, and 6 (assessor’s parcel number 8617-001-005) (Figures 1 and 2). The Project site is

1 These species typically have a limited geographic range and/or limited habitat.

September 2018 1 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

located in Los Angeles County, and within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-Minute Topographic Map Azusa Quadrangle.

Direct access to the Project site is from West Sierra Madre Avenue (Sierra Madre Ave.) and North Todd Avenue (Todd Ave.). Directions to the Project site from Interstate 210 (I-210) is to exit Irwindale Avenue and head north on Irwindale Avenue. From Irwindale Avenue, head east onto Foothill Boulevard and head north onto North Todd Avenue.

1.4 Existing Land Use

The Project site is currently occupied by the Azusa Greens Golf Course. Specifically, two golf holes (3 and 6) that play north/south, and two holes (4 and 5) that play east/west. Hole 3 plays from north to south along the eastern fairway parallel to Todd Avenue, adjacent to Rainbird. Hole 4 plays west to east on the northern fairway parallel to 10th Street, adjacent to Rainbird. Hole 5 plays east to west on the southern fairway parallel and adjacent to 10th Street. Hole 6 plays south to north on the western fairway parallel and adjacent to Todd Avenue. The golf course is relatively flat. Ornamental trees line both sides of each fairway and the course includes sand traps. No water features are present on this portion of the golf course. A single concrete block bathroom structure is located between the north/south holes (Holes 3 and 6) and the east/west holes (Holes 4 and 5).

September 2018 2 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

2.0 Project Description

The Applicant proposes to construct a 256-unit Independent Senior Living Village (“Senior Village”) on approximately 4.48 acres of the northern portion of the Azusa Greens Golf Course at the location of golf holes 3 and 6. In addition, the Project includes the reconfiguration of four golf course holes within the southern portion in order to retain an 18-hole course with the same 70 PAR.

As a result of Project Implementation, the entire Senior Village site would be entirely graded, with some grading occurring within the southern portion for the reconfiguration of the golf holes. All trees located within the Senior Village site are non-native species and are not candidates for salvaging. The earthwork is planned to be balanced within the Senior Village site and all the trees located within the Senior Village site will be removed as part of construction activities.

Furthermore, to accommodate the Senior Village, the area of the golf course just north of 10th Street, would be reconfigured to accommodate four golf holes. The reconfiguration of the golf course would require the relocation of tee boxes, greens, and obstacles. All trees located to the south of the Senior Village site are non-native species and are not candidates for salvaging. New cart paths would be constructed; trees removed; and trees added to accommodate the reconfiguration of the four holes. A minor amount of contour grading would be required to reconfigure the holes and the additional golf obstacles.

September 2018 3 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

3.0 Regulatory Context

The following is a list of the key local, state, and federal laws and regulations that apply to protecting plant communities, plants, wildlife, and water quality from project impacts relevant to the Project.

3.1 Federal Laws and Regulations

• Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) • Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) • Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)

3.2 California State Laws and Regulations

• California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and Fish and Game Code (FGC) sections 2050 et seq. • Lake and Streambed Alteration Program – FGC sections 1600-1616 • Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act – California Code, Division 7 • Migratory Birds – FGC section 3513 • Nongame Birds – FGC section 3800 (a) • Native Plant Protection Act (NPPA) – FGC sections 1900-1913

3.3 Local Plans/Regulations

• City of Azusa General Plan • The Project site is not included within any Habitat Conservation Plans

3.4 Regulatory Permits

This report is prepared pursuant to and in support of CEQA, and any applicable regulatory permit applications, including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Section 404 permit.

September 2018 4 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

4.0 Survey and Methods

Preparation for this biological study began with a review of relevant available literature. This effort was followed by an onsite field survey on May 23, 2017. The purpose of the field survey was to assess the existing habitat, confirm any onsite sensitive plant communities and jurisdictional waters, and to determine whether special status plant and wildlife species occur or potentially occur within the Study Area.

4.1 Literature Review

The study began with a review of relevant available literature on the biological resources within the Study Area and Project Vicinity.

4.1.1 Sensitive Plant Communities

Sensitive plant communities (sensitive habitats) are of limited distribution statewide or within a county or region and are often vulnerable to environmental effects of projects. Sensitive habitats are often threatened with local extirpation and are therefore considered valuable biological resources. Plant communities are considered “sensitive” if they meet any of the criteria listed below. • The habitat is recognized and considered sensitive by United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and/or is under the jurisdiction of the Corps pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA. • The habitat is under the jurisdiction of the CDFW pursuant to FGC Sections 1600-1612 and 1900-1913, and/or is classified as sensitive in CDFW’s List of California Terrestrial Natural Communities (CDFW 2016) or California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)2. • The habitat is recognized and considered sensitive by special interest groups such as the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). • The habitat is considered locally and/or regionally rare by CEQA, and the City of Azusa General Plan. • The habitat supports special status plant and/or wildlife species (defined below). • The habitat functions as an important corridor for wildlife movement.

4.1.2 Critical Habitat

Section 3 of FESA defines critical habitat as:

2 A CDFW species account database that inventories status and locations of rare plants and wildlife in California, was used to identify any sensitive plant communities and special status plants and wildlife that may exist within a two-mile radius of the Project site.

September 2018 5 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

• Specific areas within the geographic area occupied by a federally listed species with physical or biological features essential to the conservation3 of the species and that may require special management considerations or protection.

• Specific areas outside the geographic area occupied by a federally listed species that are essential for the conservation of the species.

Critical habitat also receives protection under Section 7(a)(2) of FESA through prohibition against its destruction or adverse modification with regard to actions carried out, funded, or authorized by a federal agency. Section 7(a)(2) also requires conferences between federal agencies on federal actions that are likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat.

The USFWS’ online service for information regarding Critical Habitat designations within California was reviewed to determine if the Study Area is within or near any species’ designated Critical Habitat (USFWS 2017a).

4.1.3 Special Status Plants and Wildlife

Plants and animals are afforded “special status” by federal agencies, state agencies, and/or non- governmental organizations because of their recognized rarity, potential vulnerability to extinction, and local importance. Plants and wildlife are considered special status species if they meet any of the following criteria.

• Taxa with official listing status under FESA and/or CESA. • Taxa proposed for listing under FESA and/or CESA. • Taxa designated a species of special concern by CDFW. • Taxa designated a state fully protected species by CDFW. • Taxa identified as sensitive, unique or rare, by the USFWS, CDFW, the United States Forest Service (USFS), the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and/or the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF). • Taxa protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA), MBTA, and other laws and regulations. • Plants that meet the following definitions of rare or endangered under CEQA §15380(b) and (d): • Species considered by CNPS and CDFW to be “rare, threatened or endangered in California” (California Rare Plant Rank [CRPR] 1A, 1B and 2) (CNPS 2017). A majority of the CRPR 3 and CRPR 4 plant species generally do not qualify for protection under CESA and NPPA. • Species that may warrant consideration on the basis of local significance or recent biological information.

3 Use of all methods and procedures that are necessary to bring a federally listed species to the point at which listing under FESA is no longer necessary.

September 2018 6 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

• Some species included on the CNDDB Special Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List (CDFW 2017g). • A sensitive, unique, rare or uncommon species in a local context (CEQA §15125 (c)) or is so designated in local or regional plans, policies, or ordinances (CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G), such as the City of Azusa General Plan. Examples include a species at the outer limits of its known range or a species occurring on an uncommon soil type.

Available literature and databases were reviewed to identify sensitive habitats and special status plant and wildlife species that have the potential to occur within the Project Vicinity. Several agencies, including the USFWS, CDFW, and CNPS publish lists of particular taxa (species and subspecies) and the associated level of protection or concern associated with each. Reviewed and consulted literature and databases focused on the Project Vicinity, and included the following sources listed below:

• A CNDDB search was performed assessing a two-mile radius around the Study Area (CDFW 2017f). CNDDB records are generally used as a starting point when determining what special status species, if any, may occur in the Project Vicinity (Figure 3). • USFWS critical habitats mapped in the Project vicinity (Figure 4) (USFWS 2017a). • Online CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2017) for the Project Vicinity based on the USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Map Azusa Quadrangle, within a range of 400 feet to 1,000 feet elevation. • Pertinent maps, scientific literature, websites, and regional flora and fauna field guides.

The literature review provided a baseline of potentially occurring special status plant and wildlife species from the Project Vicinity that are representative of the habitats within and adjacent to the Study Area. Species occurrence and distribution information is based on documented occurrences where surveys have taken place for individual projects, known distributions and elevation ranges, and habitat utilization from the relevant literature. Therefore, a lack of documented occurrence does not necessarily indicate that a given species is absent from the Study Area or Project Vicinity.

4.1.4 Jurisdictional Waters

Prior to conducting field surveys, the following sources were reviewed to determine the potential for jurisdictional features within the Study Area:

• National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database and maps (USFWS 2017c) are a preliminary indicator of potential wetland areas based on changes in vegetation patterns as observed from satellite imagery which is not precise data. • USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) provides the locations of “blue-line” streams as mapped on 7.5-Minute Topographic Map coverage. • Aerial Imagery (Google Earth©) (Google 2017). • USGS 7.5-Minute Topographic Maps. • NRCS Soil Survey.

September 2018 7 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

4.2 Biological Survey

4.2.1 General Biological Survey

A field survey was performed on May 23, 2017 by SLS biologist Brianna Bernard to assess and map vegetation types, plants, and wildlife, and to identify habitat areas that could be suitable for special status species including annual plants that could not be identified at that time due to different seasonal blooming periods.

Plant species were identified using plant field and taxonomical guides, such as The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition (Baldwin et al. 2012), and recorded in field notes. Aerial photographs and maps were used to assist in the delineation of plant community boundaries. Following the field survey, boundaries for the various plant communities were digitized and the vegetation map was created.

General wildlife surveys were conducted on foot and with binoculars within the Study Area, which is within the general distributional range of several special status terrestrial species although most are not subject to specific published survey protocols.

All wildlife species encountered visually, audibly or via diagnostic signs (e.g., tracks, burrows, nests, scat, remains) were identified and recorded in field notes. Wildlife field guides were used to assist with identification of species. Photographs were taken to document existing conditions within the Study Area (Appendix B).

4.2.2 Tree Survey

An inventory of the tree species and health within the Project site was conducted by Dudek in February 2017 and updated in July of 2018. The inventory was conducted to determine the current baseline condition of the type and health of tree species on the Project site. Dudek qualified arborist surveyed the Project site on foot by walking methodically across the property. Any inaccessible or restricted areas were surveyed using binoculars. The trees were evaluated for health and structural condition of the trunk and canopy. The trunk diameter was measured using diameter tape and multi trunk trees were measured at the base for simplicity. Trunk diameter was otherwise measured at a point 24 inches above ground level. The complete Dudek Arborist Report of species and the corresponding health observed can be found within Appendix A.

4.3 Jurisdictional Delineation

An assessment of the Study Area for the presence of jurisdictional features was conducted by SLS biologist Brianna Bernard on May 23, 2017. All depressions and drainages were evaluated for the presence of jurisdictional waters and wetlands according to the Corps and CDFW delineation guidelines, including connectivity or lack of connectivity to Traditional Navigable Waters.

September 2018 8 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Dominant vegetation within and adjacent to the jurisdictional features within the Study Area was identified and recorded.

The Corps and the RWQCB have jurisdiction over Waters of the United States. Jurisdictional non- wetland features for the Waters of the United States are typically determined through the observation of an Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), which is defined as the “line on the shore established by the fluctuation of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as a clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas.” Projects with impacts to Waters of the United States are regulated under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act.

To determine the presence of a jurisdictional wetland for the Waters of the United States, three indicators are required: (1) hydrophytic vegetation, (2) hydric soils, and (3) wetland hydrology. The methodology published in the United States Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the Arid West Supplement sets the standards for meeting each of the three indicators, which normally require more than 50 percent cover of dominant plant species typical of a wetland, soils exhibiting characteristics of saturation, and hydrological indicators be present. Projects with impacts to Waters of the United States are regulated under Sections 401 and 404 of the Clean Water Act.

CDFW has jurisdiction over water of the Department’s interest (California Fish and Game Code §§1600 et seq.; California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §720). Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code (FGC) applies to all rivers, streams, lakes and streambeds. CDFW defines a stream as “a body of water that flows perennially or episodically and that is defined by the area in which water currently flows, or has flowed, over a given course during the historic hydrologic course regime, and where the width of its course can reasonably be identified by physical or biological indicators” (Brady and Vyverberg 2013). Likewise, CDFW regulates jurisdictional areas of riparian habitat only to the extent that those areas are part of a stream, river, or lake as defined above. Waters of the State pertaining to Porter-Cologne in relation to RWQCB jurisdiction are defined by California Water Code Section 13050(e) as any surface or ground water within the boundaries of the state.

Prior to the field investigation, SLS biologist reviewed historical aerial imagery and topography for the Study Area to determine the potential for perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral drainages and associated riparian resources. Generally, indicators of jurisdictional drainages on an aerial photo include vegetation and/or incised lines indicating the path of flowing water. Following the desktop research, SLS biologist conducted an onsite field investigation. Based on the collective results of the desktop investigation and the field surveys, any observed jurisdictional features were mapped using the following parameters:

• As stated above, the limits of the Corps’ jurisdiction extend to the OHWM. OHWM indicators include: the observation of benches, break in bank slope, particle size distribution, sediment deposits, drift, litter, and/or change in plant community.

September 2018 9 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

• The RWQCB shares the Corps’ jurisdictional methodology. • CDFW’s jurisdiction applies to all perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral rivers, streams, and lakes in the state. CDFW’s authority also includes riparian habitat (including wetlands) supported by a river, stream, or lake regardless of the presence or absence of hydric soils and saturated soil conditions. Generally, CDFW jurisdiction is mapped to the top of bank of the stream.

September 2018 10 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

5.0 Results

5.1 Vegetation Communities

Three vegetation communities identified within the Study Area. Vegetation communities were mapped based on the Holland Classification System (Holland 1986). Where necessary, deviations were made on best professional judgment when areas did not fit into a specific habitat description provided by Holland. Plant communities were mapped in the field directly onto a 200- scale (1” = 200’) aerial photograph; acreages for each are listed in Table 1 and graphically depicted on Figure 5. Representative photographs of the vegetation communities can be found in Appendix B.

A tree survey was conducted by Dudek in February 2017, which identified a total of 601 trees onsite, of which 554 qualify under the City of Azusa Tree Preservation and Protection Ordinance with a diameter at breast height of 6 inches or greater. All the tree species observed onsite are non-native, ornamental tree species and are not candidates for salvaging. A complete list of tree species and condition of the tree species can be found in the Arborist report found in Appendix A.

Table 1. Vegetation Communities Observed within the Project Site Vegetation Community Total Acreage Ornamental 2.44 Golf Course 13.0 Developed/Disturbed 3.92 TOTAL 19.36

The species composition and general description of the habitats observed during the 2017 field survey within the Study Area are described below.

5.1.1 Ornamental

A total of 2.44 acres of ornamental habitat were observed and mapped onsite. The ornamental habitat type is dominated by pines (Pinus spp.), eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis), western sycamore (Plantus racemosa), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Portions of the ornamental habitat type are disturbed with bare soil and invasive weeds such as tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) and castor bean (Ricinus communis). Ornamental trees line both sides of each fairway and is used as protection of errant golf balls to the golf fairways and surrounding land uses. The ornamental vegetation is non-native, and some of it is considered invasive. The ornamental vegetation provides limited habitat value and is not considered a sensitive vegetation community.

September 2018 11 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Ornamental landscaping or buildings may potentially provide habitat for special status bat and avian species. The ornamental species and buildings found onsite do not provide large enough substrate to function as a roosting site for the sensitive bat species identified in the area by CNDDB. Furthermore, the ornamental landscaping and buildings do not provide deep crevices the bat species often roost in. The large trees may provide nesting habitat to the more common avian species accustom to urbanized settings. Likewise, the existing golf usage may further deter the avian species from nesting in the trees.

5.1.2 Golf Course

A total of 13.0 acres of golf course was observed and mapped onsite. The golf course is dominated by Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), along with several other non-native grass species, and eucalyptus and pine trees between the fairways. The golf course fairways provide little to no habitat for native animal species. Paved golf cart paths are also included within the acreage mapped onsite.

The golf course community within the Project site is not considered a sensitive vegetation community.

5.1.3 Developed/Disturbed

A total of 3.92 acres of disturbed area consisting of bare dirt and sparse vegetation are mapped onsite. A single concrete block bathroom structure and a portion of the golf cart path are included within this acreage.

5.2 Plants

Sensitive plant species include federally or state listed threatened or endangered species, those species listed on the CNPS rare and endangered plant inventory. A total of 2 listed plant species occur within the USGS 7.5’ Azusa quadrangle and a brief description of those species is included below. Special status plant species with the potential to occur in the Project site were analyzed based on distribution, habitat requirements, and existing site conditions (Appendix C). All plant species observed within the Project site totaled 22 species during the survey on May 23, 2017 are listed in Appendix D of this report.

Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii) Status: federally endangered Distribution: Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and Ventura Counties. Habitat(s): Occurs in recently burned and disturbed areas, usually sandstone with carbonate layers. Habitat communities include chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands. Occurs at approximately 1,000-foot elevation range. Blooms from January to August. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

September 2018 12 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) Status: federally and State endangered Distribution: Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Habitat(s): Occurs in sandy habitats including chaparral, coastal scrub (alluvial fan), and cismontane woodland. Occurs at approximately 2,100-foot elevation range. Blooms from April to June. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

As determined through the 2017 survey, no special status plant species were observed within the Project site and there is no opportunity for them to occur due to the built nature of the Project site and lack of suitable habitat and soils.

5.3 Critical Habitat

The Project site contains no designated critical habitat. The closest designated critical habitat is located 0.25 miles northwest of the Project site for the southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus).

5.4 Wildlife

Special status wildlife species with the potential to occur in the Study Area were analyzed based on the species identified in USGS 7.5’ Azusa quadrangle and the surrounding eight quadrangles, distribution, habitat requirements, and existing site conditions (Appendix E). No special status wildlife were identified through the CNDDB as being observed within the Project site. However, the following species were identified as being observed within 2-miles of the Project site: big free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops macrotis), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), Coast Range newt (Taricha torosa), least Bell’s vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus), Santa Ana sucker (Catostomus santaanae), and two-striped gartersnake (Thamnophis hammondii). A brief description of those species and their habitat is included below.

Pallid Bat (Antrozous pallidus) Status: species of special concern Habitat(s): A wide variety of habitats is occupied by pallid bats, including deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and forests form sea level up through mixed conifer forests. They are most common in deserts, preferring areas of open, dry habitats, with rocky areas for roosting and water nearby. Pallid bats day roosts in deep rock crevices, tree hollows, mines, and caves. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Santa Ana Sucker (Catostomus santaanae) Status: federally threatened Habitat(s): Found in permanent streams with substrates that are generally coarse and consist of gravel rubble, and boulders with growths of filamentous algae.

September 2018 13 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Big Free-tailed Bat (Nyctinomops macrotis) Status: species of special concern Habitat(s): The big free-tailed bat is rare in California. Records of the species are from urban areas of San Diego County. Isolated populations throughout southwestern U.S. Roosts in crevices and cliffs. This species generally prefers rugged, rocky terrain, found to 8000 feet, preferring forest and deserts. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Coastal California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica) Status: federally threatened, species of special concern Habitat(s): A non-migratory, permanent resident of coastal sage scrub habitat, which is a broad category of vegetation that includes the following plant communities: Ventura coastal sage scrub, Diegan coastal sage scrub, maritime succulent scrub, Riversidean sage scrub, Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, southern coastal bluff scrub, and coastal sage-chaparral scrub. They avoid nesting on steep slopes. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Coast Range Newt (Taricha torosa) Status: species of special concern Habitat(s): Wet forests, oak forests, chaparral and rolling grasslands. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Two-striped Gartersnake (Thamnophis hammondii) Status: species of special concern Habitat(s): Generally found around pools, creeks, cattle tanks, and other water sources, often in rocky areas, in oak woodland, chaparral, brushland, and coniferous forest. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

Least Bell’s Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus) Status: federally and state endangered Habitat(s): Primarily occupies riverine riparian habitats that typically feature dense cover within 1-2 m of the ground and a dense, stratified canopy. Typically, it is associated with southern willow scrub, cottonwood-willow forest, mule fat scrub, sycamore alluvial woodland, coast live oak riparian forest, arroyo willow riparian forest, or mesquite in desert localities. It uses habitat which is limited to the immediate vicinity of water courses. Status onsite: None. The site lacks suitable habitat. Not observed during field visit.

None of these species or evidence of their presence were observed or heard during the 2017 survey, and given the site’s built and urbanized environment, existing golf play, and lack of habitat there is no opportunity for them to occur onsite.

September 2018 14 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

5.4.1 Wildlife Species Observed or Detected

The animal species or signs thereof observed during the SLS survey are listed below:

Birds: • American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) • Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna) • California towhee (Melozone crissalis) • house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) • mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) • lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria) • black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans)

Mammals: • California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi)

5.5 Regional Connectivity/Wildlife Movement

Wildlife travel routes, corridors, linkages, and crossings link together areas of suitable habitat that are otherwise separated, fragmented and isolated by areas of urbanization. In their absence, various studies have concluded that some wildlife species, especially the larger and more mobile mammals, will not likely persist over time in fragmented or isolated habitat areas because they prohibit the infusion of new individuals and genetic information (MacArthur and Wilson 1967, Soule 1987, Harris and Gallager 1989). Wildlife movement pathways effectively act as links between different populations of a species. A group of smaller populations (termed “demes”) linked together via a system of such wildlife movement pathways is termed a “meta-population.” The long-term health of each deme within the meta-population is dependent upon its size and the frequency of interchange of individuals (immigration versus emigration). The smaller the deme, the more important immigration becomes, because prolonged inbreeding with the same individuals can reduce genetic variability. Immigrant individuals that move into the deme from adjoining demes mate with individuals and supply that deme with new genes and gene combinations that increases overall genetic diversity. An increase in a population’s genetic variability is generally associated with an increase in a population’s health.

Wildlife movement pathways mitigate the effects of habitat fragmentation by:

• Allowing animals to move between remaining habitats, which allows depleted populations to be replenished and promotes genetic diversity. • Providing escape routes from fire, predators, and human disturbances, thus reducing the risk that catastrophic events (such as fires or disease) will result in population or local species extinction.

September 2018 15 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

• Serving as travel routes for individual animals as they move within their home ranges in search of food, water, mates, and other needs (Fahrig and Merriam 1985, Simberloff and Cox 1987, Harris and Gallagher 1989).

Wildlife movement activities usually fall into one of three categories:

• Dispersal (e.g., juvenile animals from natal areas, individuals extending range distributions). • Seasonal migration. • Movements related to home range activities (foraging for food or water, defending territories, searching for mates, breeding areas, or cover).

The following terms to describe wildlife movement are defined below:

• Travel route: a landscape feature (such as a ridge line, drainage, canyon, or riparian strip) within a larger natural habitat area that is used frequently by animals to facilitate movement and provide access to necessary resources (e.g., water, food, cover, den sites). The travel route is generally preferred because it provides the least amount of topographic resistance in moving from one area to another; it contains adequate food, water, and/or cover while moving between habitat areas; and provides a relatively direct link between target habitat areas.

• Wildlife corridor: a piece of habitat, usually linear in nature, that connects two or more habitat patches that would otherwise be fragmented or isolated from one another. Wildlife corridors are usually bounded by urban land areas or other areas unsuitable for wildlife. The corridor generally contains suitable cover, food, and/or water to support species and facilitate movement while in the corridor. Larger, landscape-level corridors (often referred to as “habitat or landscape linkages”) can provide both transitory and resident habitat for a variety of species.

• Habitat Linkage: a connection between blocks of habitat with adequate size, configuration, and vegetation characteristics to provide for live-in habitat and/or provide interaction of wildlife to maintain natural evolutionary and ecological patterns. Linkages are fundamental for gene flow and large scale ecological processes. These areas are usually defined by the zones of “least resistance” for the genes of a given species to move or “flow” between core reserve populations.

• Wildlife crossing: a small, narrow area, relatively short in length and generally constricted in nature, that allows wildlife to pass under or through an obstacle or barrier that otherwise hinders or prevents movement. Crossings are typically manmade and include culverts, underpasses, drainage pipes, and tunnels to provide access across or under roads, highways, pipelines, or other physical obstacles. These are often “choke points” along a movement corridor.

September 2018 16 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

5.5.1 Wildlife Movement within the Study Area

Large open spaces support a diverse ecological community representing all types of wildlife movements. Each category of movement may also be represented at a variety of scales from non-migratory movement of amphibians, reptiles, and some birds, on a local level to many square-mile home ranges of large mammals moving at a regional level. Due to the urbanized setting, the Project site does not serve as a local wildlife corridor.

5.6 Jurisdictional Areas

During the field survey, it was determined that the Project site does not include any jurisdictional areas or wetlands. No water features are present on this portion of the golf course.

5.7 Soils Mapping

The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) lists a single soil type in the Project site (Figure 6), as described below:

Urban Land-Soboba Complex Soils of this series consist of somewhat excessively drained soils with very high runoff and slow permeability. These soils are found on 0 to 5 percent slopes at elevations of 310 to 2,080 feet. Urban Land Soboba Complex is mapped over the entire Project site.

6.0 Project Impacts

This section discusses potential impacts to biological resources that could result from Project implementation. Biological resources may be either directly or indirectly impacted by a Project. Direct and indirect impacts may be either permanent or temporary in nature. These impact categories are defined below.

• Direct impact: any loss, alteration, disturbance or destruction of biological resources that would result from project-related activities is a direct impact. Examples include vegetation clearing, encroaching into wetlands, diverting natural surface water flows, and the loss of individual species and/or their habitats. Direct permanent impacts resulting from Project implementation consist of any ground‐disturbing activities (i.e., vegetation removal, grading, paving, building of structures, installing landscaping, creating the fuel modification zone, etc.).

• Indirect impact: as a result of Project-related activities, biological resources may also be affected in a manner that is not direct. Examples of indirect impacts include elevated noise, light, and dust levels, increased human activity, decreased water quality, erosion created by the removal of vegetation, and the introduction of invasive plants and

September 2018 17 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

unnatural predators (e.g. domestic cats and dogs). These indirect impacts may be both short term and long term in their extent.

• Permanent impacts: all impacts that result in the long-term or irreversible removal of biological resources are considered permanent. Examples include constructing a building or permanent road on an area containing biological resources.

• Temporary impacts: any impacts considered to have reversible effects on biological resources can be viewed as temporary. Examples include the generation of fugitive dust during grading, or removing vegetation and either allowing the natural vegetation to recolonize or actively revegetating the impact area.

Under each section, potential impacts are discussed.

6.1 Impacts to Vegetation Communities/Habitats

Figure 7 and Table 2 describe and list the approximate total acreages of vegetation communities that will be permanently and temporary impacted by Project activities. Calculations were based on the currently proposed development design in combination with the vegetation map from the field survey and aerial imagery.

Indirect temporary impacts to plant communities include the effects of fugitive dust created by grading activities, vehicle construction traffic, or offsite discharge of surface water runoff with its associated erosion and sedimentation. Grading-related dust could settle on plant surfaces and indirectly inhibit metabolic processes such as photosynthesis and respiration. Grading-related erosion, runoff, sedimentation, soil compaction, and alteration of drainage patterns may affect plants by altering site conditions so that the location in which they are growing becomes unfavorable. Another example of indirect impacts includes the introduction and spread of invasive, exotic plants which could result in permanent indirect impacts to adjacent native plant communities.

Table 2. Approximate Acreage of Potential Impacts to Vegetation Communities on the Project Site Existing Vegetation Total Permanent Total Temporary Vegetation Community onsite Impacts (acres) Impacts (acres) (acres) Ornamental 2.44 0.56 0.34 Golf Course 13.0 3.87 3.20 Developed/Disturbed 3.92 0.05 2.28 Total 19.36 4.48 5.82

Permanent and temporary impacts to the 10.3 acres of the ornamental, golf course, and developed/disturbed communities onsite from Project grading are not significant because these

September 2018 18 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

areas are not considered sensitive habitats. Furthermore, the 5.82 acres will be temporary impacted due to the reconfiguration of golf holes, and will be returned to golf fairways, sand traps, and greens.

6.2 Potential Impacts to Special Status Plants

As concluded in Section 5.2 above, no special status plant species were observed during the 2017 survey and none are expected to occur onsite due to the urbanized nature of the Project site; therefore, there are no potential impacts to special status plants due to Project implementation.

6.3 Potential Impacts to Critical Habitat

The proposed Project would not result in direct or indirect impacts to the designated critical habitats identified in Section 5.3 above due to the distance of the designated critical habitat and lack of suitable habitat found within the Project site.

6.4 Potential Impacts to Special Status Wildlife

Implementation of the Project could result in direct impacts to special status wildlife species through loss of potential nesting habitat (onsite ornamental areas) for avian species, as shown in Table 3 below. Impacts to avian species protected by the MBTA may occur as a result of Project construction, both permanent in the form of tree removal, and temporary short-term construction and operations (long-term). If Project construction is scheduled to occur during the typical breeding bird season (January through September), noise impacts have the potential to disrupt nesting activities within onsite ornamental areas. For potential short-term noise effects to birds that may forage in the onsite ornamental areas, it is expected such birds would fly away at the sight of approaching construction workers and equipment, and would therefore not be significantly impacted by construction-related noise levels. For impacts associated to tree removal which may affect nesting birds that may use the ornamental areas onsite, construction activities and construction-related noise levels could significantly impact these birds by disturbing their nesting activities (Impact Bio-1).

Table 3 Impact Analysis Summary for Special Status Species Species Extent of Impact Significance of Impact Pallid Bat No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit. Santa Ana Sucker No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit.

September 2018 19 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Species Extent of Impact Significance of Impact Big Free-tailed Bath No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit. Coastal California gnatcatcher No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit. Coast Range Newt No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit. Two-striped Gartersnake No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit. Least Bell’s vireo No suitable habitat is found within No Impact due to lack the Project site as identified within of suitable habitat Section 5.4. onsite. Not observed during field visit.

Project construction could also result in additional short-term impacts including night lighting, littering, and illegal wildlife collections. However, Project compliance with the following BMPs under State and federal laws would reduce the potential for such indirect impacts to below significance:

• All temporary construction-related night lighting used in onsite development areas will be shielded and/or directed downward to avoid indirect impacts to nocturnal wildlife such that night lighting could increase predation rates.

• All construction contractors, subcontractors, and employees will comply with the litter and pollution laws and will institute a litter control/removal program during the course of construction activities to reduce the attractiveness of the area to opportunistic predators such as coyotes, opossums, and common ravens.

• Active nests (nests with chicks or eggs) cannot be removed or disturbed. Nests may be removed or disturbed by a qualified biologist, if not active.

• Construction employees, contractors, and site visitors will be prohibited from collecting wildlife.

September 2018 20 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

With implementation of the night lighting reduction PDFs via their inclusion in the Project’s MMRP, potential indirect long-term impacts to wildlife would be reduced to below significance.

6.5 Potential Impacts to Wildlife Movement

As described earlier, the Project site does not function as a wildlife corridor due to the urbanized nature of the Project site. Therefore, the Project would not result in direct or indirect impacts to wildlife movement.

6.6 Potential Impacts to Jurisdictional Features

No federal/State jurisdictional areas occur within the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would not result in direct or indirect impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands.

September 2018 21 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

7.0 BMPs/PDFs Incorporated into the Project and MMRP

The Project will comply with the following:

• Work area limits will be defined and respected. All grading areas will have their boundaries clearly flagged or marked before Project implementation and all disturbances will be confined to the flagged areas. All key Project personnel will be instructed that their activities must be confined to locations within the flagged areas. Disturbance beyond the actual grading zone is prohibited without site-specific surveys.

• Cleared or trimmed non-native, exotic vegetation and woody debris will be disposed of in a legal manner at an approved disposal site.

• Employees, contractors, and site visitors will be prohibited from collecting plants and wildlife.

• Water pollution and erosion control plans will be developed and implemented in accordance with SWPPP requirements.

• Access to construction sites will be via preexisting access routes.

• Construction equipment will be properly maintained; construction employees and contractors will be trained on proper implementation and monitoring of BMPs; and procedures will be implemented to minimize the likelihood of hazardous spills and to control sediment-laden runoff.

• Effective perimeter control BMPs to control discharge of pollutants from the Project site during construction.

• Active nests (nests with chicks or eggs) cannot be removed or disturbed. Nests may be removed or disturbed by a qualified biologist, if not active.

September 2018 22 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

8.0 Proposed Mitigation

8.1 Wildlife Species

Implementation of the following mitigation measure would reduce potential Project impacts to nesting birds to below significance:

MM Bio-1: If site disturbance is scheduled to occur during the typical nesting bird season March 1st to September 15th (January 1st through July 31st for Raptors), a pre-disturbance nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within 3 days of site disturbance, to determine the presence of nests or nesting birds. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish non-disturbance buffers around them (500 feet for raptors and sensitive species, 200 feet for non-raptors/non-sensitive species). The biologist shall monitor these buffers weekly to ensure no work occurs within them, until the nesting effort is finished (i.e., the juveniles have successfully fledged and are surviving independent from the nest). Work can resume within the buffers when no other active nests are found. Alternatively, a qualified biologist may determine that construction can be permitted within the non-disturbance buffer areas with implementation of a monitoring and mitigation plan to prevent any impacts while the nest continues to be active (eggs, chicks, etc.). Upon completion of the survey and any follow-up measures that may be required, a report shall be prepared and submitted to the City for mitigation monitoring compliance record keeping. If vegetation clearing is not completed within 5 days of a negative survey, the nesting survey must be repeated to confirm the absence of nesting birds.

September 2018 23 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

9.0 Cumulative Impacts

The loss of biological resources on the Project site must be considered in the context of the other development in the area. As identified within Section 6.1, the vegetation communities identified onsite are not considered sensitive habitats and are abundant in the surrounding Project vicinity. Within the City of Azusa, a total of 15 cumulative projects are currently being proposed or are in the process of construction, two of which are adjacent to the Project site. Those two projects exist in a built environment or disturbed habitat, therefore, there is no cumulative contribution to the loss of sensitive habitats.

Direct impacts may occur to nesting birds, should construction activities and vegetation removal take place during the typical nesting season. However, adherence to the BMPs and PDFs as outlined in Section 7.0, as well as implementation of MM-Bio 1, will ensure impacts to special status species and their habitats are minimized, thus the Project’s overall contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant.

September 2018 24 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

10.0 Literature Cited

Amphibiaweb. 2017. Species Accounts. Retrieved from: http://amphibiaweb.org/search/index.html

AOU (The American Ornithologists' Union). 1998. Check-List of North American Birds. 7th Edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. 829 pp.

Baldwin, B. G., D. H. Goldman, D. J. Keil, R. Patterson, T. J. Rosatti, and D. H. Wilken, editors. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition. University California Press, Berkeley.

Bowers, N., R. Bowers, and K. Kaufman. 2004. Mammals of North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York.

Brady, Roland H. III, Kris Vyverberg. 2013. Methods to Describe and Delineate Episodic Stream Processes on Arid Landscapes for Permitting Utility‐Scale Solar Power Plants. California Energy Commission. Publication Number: CEC‐500‐2014‐013.

Calflora. 2017. Calflora website - search for plants. Retrieved from: http://www.calflora.org/species/index.html.

CaliforniaHerps.com. 2017. California Herps. A Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of California. Retrieved from: http://www.californiaherps.com/.

Cal-IPC (California Invasive Plant Council). 2006. California Invasive Plant Inventory. Cal- IPC Publication 2006-02. California Invasive Plant Council: Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/inventory/index.php.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017. Natural Communities List (May 2017). Biographic Data Branch. The Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP/Natural-Communities.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017a. California Endangered Species Act (CESA). Retrieved from: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CESA.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017b. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Retrieved from: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CEQA.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017c. Fish and Game Code Section 1600- 1616. Retrieved from: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=3784.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017d. Lake and Streambed Alteration Program. Retrieved from: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/LSA.

September 2018 25 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017e. Life History Accounts and Range Maps – California Wildlife Habitat Relationship System. Retrieved from: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CWHR/Life-History-and-Range.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017f. RareFind, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). State of California, The Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, CA.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife), Natural Diversity Database. May 2017. (2017g). Special Vascular Plants, Bryophytes, and Lichens List. Quarterly publication. 124 pp.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife), Natural Diversity Database. April 2017 (2017h). Special Animals List. Periodic publication. 51 pp. Retried from: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109406.

CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017i. State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Resource Management and Planning Division, Biogeographic Data Branch, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, CA.

Clark, W.S. and B.K. Wheeler. 2001. A Field Guide to Hawks of North America, Second Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston and New York.

CNPS, Rare Plant Program. 2017. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8- 02). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. Website http://www.rareplants.cnps.org [accessed May 2017].

Corps (United States Army Corps of Engineers). 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-28. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.

Dudek. Arborist Report. August 2018.

Eder, Tamara. 2005. Mammals of California. Lone Pine Publishing International Inc, Auburn, WA.

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.

September 2018 26 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. Laws and Regulations. Summary of the Endangered Species Act. Retrieved from: http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/laws/esa.html

Fahrig, L., and G. Merriam. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762-1768.

Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC Cooperative technical publication.

Fish and Game Commission. 2017. California Law. California Fish and Game Code. Retrieved from: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codesTOCSelected.xhtml?tocCode=FGC&tocTitle=+ Fish+and+Game+Code+-+FGC

Google. 2017. GoogleEarth© website.

Government Printing Office. 1991. Federal Register, 1989 “Federal Manual for Identifying Jurisdictional Wetlands; Proposed Revisions.” August 14, 1991, Vol. 56, No. 157, pp 40446- 40480.

Harris, L.D. and Gallagher, P.B. 1989. New initiatives for wildlife conservation: The need for movement corridors. In defense of wildlife: Preserving communities and corridors. pp. 11-34. Edited by G. Mackintosh. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.

Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. State of California, The Resources Agency, Nongame Heritage Program, California Department of Fish & Game, Sacramento, Calif. 156 pp.

Jennings, M.R. and M.P. Hayes. 1994. Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California. Submitted to the California Department of Fish and Game Inland Fisheries Division. Rancho Cordova, CA.

National Geographic Society. Edited by Jonathan Alderfer. 2006. Complete Birds of North America. National Geographic Society. Washington D.C.

NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org.

NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2017. Web Soil Survey. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Condservation Service. Retrieved from: http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx

September 2018 27 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project

Sibley, David Allen. 2000. National Audubon Society, The Sibley Guide to Birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

Simberloff, D., and J. Cox. 1987. Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology. 1:63-71.

Soule, Michael E. 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Cambridgeshire and New York.

SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board). 2011. Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act with Additions and Amendments Effective April 2017. Compiled by the Office of Chief Counsel. Retrieved from: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/laws_regulations/docs/portercologne.pdf

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1995. Hydric Soils of California.

USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2017a. FWS Critical Habitat for Threatened and Endangered Species. Retrieved from https://www.fws.gov/endangered/.

USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2017b. Migratory Birds & Habitat Programs. Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Retrieved from: https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies- and-regulations.php.

USFWS (United States Fish and Wildlife Service). 2017c. National Wetlands Inventory. Wetlands Mapper. Retrieved from: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/mapper.html.

WTI (Wetland Training Institute, Inc.). 1999. Field Guide for Wetland Delineation: 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual. Glenwood, NM WTI 99-1. 143 pp.

WTI (Wetland Training Institute, Inc.). 2003. Wetland Delineation Lecture Notes and Field Guide for Wetland Delineation based on the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual. WTI, New Mexico.

September 2018 28 FIGURES Approximate Project Location ^_

Prepared By: I Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/26/2017 Data Sources: Bing Maps California Grand Village Project Feet 0 5,000 10,000 20,000 Regional Map 1 inch = 20,000 feet FIGURE 1 Legend Approximate Project Site 200-foot Buffer

Prepared By: I Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/25/2017 Data Sources: Bing Maps California Grand Village Project Feet 0 87.5 175 350 Project Vicinity Map 1 inch = 325 feet FIGURE 2 Legend Approximate Project Site 2-mile Buffer CNDDB Occurences big free-tailed bat coastal California gnatcatcher Coast Range newt least Bell's vireo many-stemmed dudleya pallid bat Santa Ana sucker two-striped gartersnake

Prepared By: I Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/25/2017 Data Sources: Bing Maps California Grand Village Project Feet CNDDB 04/2017 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 CNDDB Occurences 1 inch = 3,500 feet FIGURE 3 Legend Approximate Project Site 2-mile Buffer Critical Habitat Southwestern Willow Flycatcher

Prepared By: I Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/25/2017 Data Sources: Bing Maps California Grand Village Project Feet 0 750 1,500 3,000 4,500 Critical Habitat 1 inch = 3,500 feet FIGURE 4 Legend Approximate Project Site Vegetation (19.36 acres) Oranmental (2.44 acres) Golf Course (13.0 acres) Developed/Disturbed (3.92 acres)

Prepared By: I California Grand Village Project Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/25/2017 Feet Data Source: Bing Map 0 150 300 600 Field Survey (5/25/17) Vegetation Map 1 inch = 150 feet Figure 5 Legend Approximate Project Site Soil Urban Land-Soboba Complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes

Prepared By: I California Grand Village Project Carlson SLS Map Created: 05/25/2017 Feet Data Source: Bing Map 0 150 300 600 USDA NRCS (5/25/17) Soil Map 1 inch = 150 feet Figure 6 Legend Approximate Project Site Impacts Permanent Impacts Temporary Impacts Vegetation Oranmental Golf Course Developed/Disturbed

Prepared By: I California Grand Village Project Carlson SLS Map Created: 09/07/2018 Feet Data Source: Bing Map 0 150 300 600 Field Survey (5/25/17) Vegetation Impact Map 1 inch = 150 feet PROACTIVE (08/09/18) Figure 7 Appendix A

California Grand Village Arborist Report California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Prepared for:

California Grand Villages Azusa Greens LLC 1209 Santiago Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 Contact: Drew D. Purvis

Prepared by:

38 North Marengo Avenue Pasadena, California 91101 Contact: Christopher J. Kallstrand

UPDATED AUGUST 2018

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No.

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...... III 1 INTRODUCTION...... 1 1.1 Site Description ...... 1 1.2 Project Description...... 2 2 METHODS ...... 7 2.1 Individual Tree Evaluation ...... 7 2.2 Scope of Work Limitations ...... 8 3 OBSERVATIONS ...... 9 3.1 Individual Trees ...... 9 4 TREE PRESERVATION ...... 11 4.1 Regulatory Definitions and Requirements ...... 11 4.1.1 City of Azusa ...... 11 4.1.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ...... 12 4.2 Impacts ...... 13 4.2.1 Direct Tree Impacts (Senior Village Center) ...... 13 4.2.2 Indirect Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Reconfigured Golf Course ...... 14 5 MITIGATION ...... 17 5.1 Replacement Program Per City Ordinance ...... 17 6 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES ...... 19 6.1 Tree Protection Measures Prior to Construction ...... 19 6.2 Protection and Maintenance During Construction ...... 19 6.3 Maintenance After Construction ...... 21 7 CONCLUSIONS ...... 23 8 REFERENCES ...... 25

APPENDICES

A Tree Location Exhibit B Tree Data Matrix C Tree Impact Exhibit D Tree Impact Exhibit: Mitigation Impact Trees

10186 i August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. FIGURES

1 Regional Map ...... 3 2 Vicinity Map ...... 5

TABLES

1 Summary of Trees Azusa Green Project Site ...... 9 2 Summary of Direct Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Sidewalk Improvements ...... 14 3 Summary of Indirect Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Reconfigured Golf Course ...... 15 4 Summary of Direct Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Reconfigured Golf Course ...... 15

10186 ii August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym/Abbreviation Definition DGH diameter at breast height GPS Global Positioning System ISA International Society of Arboriculture

10186 iii August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

10186 iv August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

1 INTRODUCTION

Dudek evaluated and recorded information about regulated trees classified as protected over 6 inches in diameter at diameter breast height, and prepared this arborist report for the proposed California Grand Village Azusa Greens (project) in the City of Azusa (City), California. Primary topics of this arborist report include evaluations of project-related impacts and recommendations for tree protection, relocation, removal, and mitigation. The project site is located on private land.

Dudek’s International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)-certified arborists performed various tasks associated with surveying, inventorying, and evaluating the condition of the property’s trees, as described in the following sections. The purpose of this arborist report is to present the physical characteristics, mapped locations, impact and preservation totals, and appropriate mitigation for impacts to protected trees. The tree quantities and related project impacts have been analyzed and are reported in the following text.

In summary, the Azusa Green property exhibits a manicured, landscape setting with scattered native and non-native ornamental trees throughout the property. In summary, there are 554 protected trees located throughout the project site. Of these, 312 trees (approximately 56%) are expected to be impacted by the proposed project and associated infrastructure improvements. Of the impacted protected trees, none are considered candidates for relocation. Furthermore, due to the region’s ongoing drought, 24 trees (11 potential impacts and 15 protected trees) of which are protected were found to be dead, and as such, are recommended for removal.

1.1 Site Description

The project site is composed of two individual locations that total approximately 20 acres in the northwest corner of the City of Azusa (Figure 1). The first location, the Senior Village site, is approximately 4.8 acres and is located at the southeast corner of W. Sierra Madre Avenue (Sierra Madre Avenue). The second location, the golf course reconfiguration, is approximately 15.2 acres, and is located south of the first location, along W. 10th Street. The project site is comprised of Assessor’s Parcel Number 8617-001-005.

The Senior Village site is bounded by Sierra Madre Avenue and attached residential housing to the north, Rainbird (light industrial) to the east, Azusa Greens Golf Course to the south, and Todd Avenue and Colorama Nursery (future light industrial) to the west. The reconfigured golf course holes are bound by Rainbird to the north, residential housing to the east, W. 10th Street to the south, and Todd Avenue to the west. Figures 1 and 2 show the regional and local location of the project site.

10186 1 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

1.2 Project Description

The applicant, California Grand Villages Azusa LLC, proposes to construct a 256-unit independent living village for seniors in the location of holes 3 and 6 on the Azusa Greens Golf Course in the southeast corner of Sierra Madre Avenue and Todd Avenue. To maintain 18-hole golf and the current par, the area of holes 4 and 5 along 10th Street would be reconfigured to accommodate all four golf holes (3, 4, 5, and 6).

The proposed project is comprised of two phases: (1) a reconfiguration of the existing golf course design (phase 1), and (2) the re-development of 4.8 acres for an independent living village for seniors (phase 2). To accommodate the proposed Senior Village (phase 1), the area of golf course just north of 10th Street and south of the proposed project would be reconfigured to accommodate four golf holes. While the overall yardage of golf play over these four holes would be slightly reduced, the par would remain the same. The reconfiguration of the golf course would require the relocation of tee boxes, greens, and obstacles. The existing comfort station between golf holes 3 and 4 would be relocated approximately 150 feet to the south. New cart paths would be constructed; trees would be removed; and trees would be added. A minor amount of contour grading would be required to reconfigure the holes.

The Senior Village (phase 2) consists of 256 units, of which 194 are specified for senior independent living, 30 for senior assisted living, and 32 for senior memory care. While primarily an independent living village, the assisted living and memory care provide continuing care as needed for either existing tenants or others in need.

10186 2 August 2018 Kern County

¤£395

?18

?14 SanBernardino County

Los Angeles County

138? 126?

?2 173? ¨¦§5

?39 118? Project Site ? 206? 170 ? ? 159 134 ¨¦§210 ?66 101 ¤£ ¨¦§10 ?83 ¨¦§215 187? ?60 ? ¨¦§605 71 105 ?72 Los Angeles County ¨¦§ ?19 142? 710 Orange County ¨¦§ ? ¨¦§110 ?57 90 ¨¦§15 ?91 405 107? ¨¦§

?1 ?22 213? ?47 ?55 ¨¦§5 241? P a c i f i c ?74 133?

O c e a n ?73

Orange County

California Grand Village Azusa Greens - Arborist Report Date: 2/28/2017 - Last saved by: ckallstrand - Path: Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\8x11_Regional_Portrait.mxd California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

10186 4 August 2018 Project Site

n 0 950 1,900 Feet

SOURCE: USGS 7.5' Poway, CA Quadrangle Figure 2 Vicinity Map California Grand Village Azusa Green - Arborist Report Date: 2/28/2017 - Last saved by: ckallstrand - Path: Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\8x11_Vicinty_Portrait.mxd California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

10186 6 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

2 METHODS 2.1 Individual Tree Evaluation

Dudek mapped and collected tree attribute information for all trees within and immediately adjacent to the tree survey area meeting the City’s definition of a “protected tree,” which includes all trees that have a minimum diameter of 6 inches at 4.5 feet above natural grade (City of Azusa 2002). The location of each individual mature tree was mapped using a Trimble Pathfinder Pro XH Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver (Appendix A, Tree Location Exhibit). The Pathfinder has a horizontal accuracy of 1 meter (1 sigma) using differential code positioning techniques. Since tree canopies can sometimes cause loss of satellite lock by blocking the line-of-sight to satellites, an electronic compass and reflectorless, electronic distance-measuring device was also used in mapping tree locations. The electronic distance- measuring/compass combination operates in concert with the Pathfinder system to position offsets, and offset information is automatically attached to the GPS position data string. Protected trees were tagged in the field with an aluminum tree tag bearing a unique identification number. The tags were placed on the trunk of each inventoried tree and tag numbers correspond with the individual tree data in Appendix B, Tree Data Matrix.

Concurrent with tree mapping efforts, Dudek arborists collected tree attribute data including species, quantity of individual trunks, individual trunk diameters, overall height, canopy extent, and general health and structural conditions. Trunk diameter measurements were collected at 4.5 feet above the ground along the trunk axis with a few common exceptions. In cases where a tree’s trunk is located on a slope, the 4.5-foot distance was approximated as the average of the shortest and longest sides of the trunk (i.e., the uphill side and downhill side of a tree’s trunk, respectively), and the measurement was made at the circumference of the trunk at this point. Tree height measurements were ocular estimates made by experienced field arborists. Tree canopy diameters were typically estimated by “pacing-off” the measurement based on the investigator’s knowledge of his stride length or by visually estimating the canopy width. The tree crown diameter measurements were made along an imaginary line intersecting the tree trunk that best approximated the average canopy diameter.

Pursuant to the Guide for Plant Appraisal (ISA 2000), tree health and structure were evaluated with respect to five distinct tree components: roots, trunk(s), scaffold branches, small branches, and foliage. Each component of the tree was assessed with regard to health factors such as insect, fungal, or pathogen damage; fire damage; mechanical damage; presence of decay; presence of wilted or dead leaves; and wound closure. Components were graded as good, fair, poor, and dead, with good representing no apparent problems and dead representing a dying and/or dead tree. This method of tree condition rating is comprehensive and results in ratings

10186 7 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report that are useful for determining the status of trees based on common standards. Trees in natural settings have important habitat value, as evidenced by numerous cavity nesters and insects that thrive on and within oak trees, even when they are considered in poor structural or health condition. However, this assessment focuses on tree condition concerning health and structure for the purposes of analyzing potential project impacts, and where necessary, providing recommendations for mitigating potential tree hazards, such as trees with weak limb attachments, cavities and rot, or excessive lean.

The health and structure of the trees was re-evaluated on July 17, 2018. The re-evaluation was conducted due to the length of time that had passed since the initial inspection in 2017. Detail provided within this report identify the health and structure of the trees as on July 18, 2018. Appendix B details the health and structure of the trees as found during the initial inventory in 2017 and updated evaluation in 2018.

Upon completion of field data collection and mapping, raw GPS data were post-processed using GPS Pathfinder Office (version 5.4), and individual tree location data were compiled and updated in a geographic information system. The digital tree locations were linked to individual tree identification numbers and associated tree attribute data. This data set was then evaluated using ArcGIS software (version 10.1) to determine the position of individual trees related to the proposed project development areas. Data resulting from this analysis were used to evaluate the individual tree impact totals presented in this arborist report.

2.2 Scope of Work Limitations

No root crown excavations or investigations, aerial evaluations, or internal probing were performed during the tree assessments. Therefore, the presence or absence of internal decay or other hidden inferiorities in individual trees could not be confirmed. It is recommended that any large tree proposed for preservation in an area that receives human use be thoroughly inspected for internal or subterranean decay by a qualified ISA-certified arborist before finalizing preservation plans.

10186 8 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

3 OBSERVATIONS 3.1 Individual Trees

Dudek mapped and evaluated 601 trees located within and immediately adjacent to the California Grand Village tree survey area. The 601 trees are comprised of 554 protected trees (over 6 inches in diameter) and 47 non-protected trees (under 6 inches in diameter). Furthermore, the 601 trees are comprised of 23 individual trees species. As Appendix B indicates, a majority of the inventoried trees (97.8%) are non-native, ornamental tree species. Table 1 provides a summary of the trees mapped and evaluated within the tree survey area. Appendix A presents the location of the individual trees mapped and assessed for the project.

Overall, the trees exhibit growth and structural conditions that are typical of their locations and of landscape trees. The trees include various trunk and branch maladies and health and structural conditions. As presented in Appendix B, most of the individually mapped trees, 76.71% (461 trees), exhibit fair health condition; 15.14% (91 trees) are in poor health condition; 3.00% (18 trees) in good health; and 3.99% (24 trees) are dead. Structurally, .17% (1 tree) of the individually mapped trees are considered to exhibit good structure; 63.73% (383 trees) exhibit fair structure; 32.11% (193 trees) exhibit poor structure; and 3.99% (24 trees) are dead. Good condition trees exhibit acceptable vigor, healthy foliage, and adequate structure and lack any major maladies. Fair condition trees are typical, with few maladies but declining vigor. Poor and very poor condition trees exhibit declining vigor, unhealthy foliage, poor branch structure, and excessive lean. The high percentage of structurally poor trees is directly attributed to overhead utility maintenance and the practice of tree topping to maintain “low” canopies. No pests and/or pathogens were observed on site.

Table 1 Summary of Trees Azusa Green Project Site

Scientific Name Common Name Number of Trees Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean fan palm 1 Cinnamonum camphora Cinnamon camphor 1 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 16 Eucalyptus maculata Spotted gum 3 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 5 Eucalyptus spp. Eucalyptus 1 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 73 Fraxinus velutina Arizona ash 3 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 11 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 26

10186 9 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Table 1 Summary of Trees Azusa Green Project Site

Scientific Name Common Name Number of Trees Unknown Unknown 2 Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date palm 16 Pinus canariensis Canary Island pine 345 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 4 Pinus halepensis Aleppo pine 30 Pinus pinea Stone pine 18 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 3 Prunus sp. Cherry 1 Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak 2 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper 5 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 12 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 5 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 18 Total 601

Trees within the tree survey area vary in size and stature according to species and available growing space. The site’s trees are composed of single- and multi-stemmed trees, with single- stemmed trunk diameters ranging from 2 to 40 inches and combined multi-stemmed trunk diameters ranging from 3 to 50 inches. Tree heights vary from 5 to 75 feet. Tree canopy extents range from 5 feet to nearly 55 feet. Over 70% of the trees on site exhibit canopy spreads that are greater than 20 feet across at their widest points.

10186 10 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

4 TREE PRESERVATION 4.1 Regulatory Definitions and Requirements

The following section summarizes the relevant policies regulating tree impact and removal associated with the project.

4.1.1 City of Azusa

The City’s Tree Preservation Ordinance is outlined in Sections 62-191 through 62-201 of the City’s Code of Ordinances. Section 62-197 provides general requirements for new subdivisions.

Section 62-197 (General requirements for new subdivisions):

A. References to DBH. References to “DBH” (diameter at breast height) shall include, by inference, the phrase “at four and one-half feet above natural grade.” B. Preservation of existing trees. All existing living trees having a DBH of six inches or more shall be preserved when so directed by director of public works, and no grading shall be done to endanger them. C. Destruction of trees. If said trees are destroyed, applicant shall replace them with trees whose size, number, and planting location shall be determined by the director of public works before final occupancy is granted to any new residents. The size and age of the tree will determine how many new trees may be substituted for the destroyed tree, but as a minimum three new trees will replace one tree removed. The ratio may be increased at the discretion of the director. D. Tree well details and plans. Tree well details and plans may be submitted at the direction of the director of public works for locations where cuts or fills adjacent to trees exceed one foot in height.

E. Tree preservation during construction. 1. Trees that have a six-inch or greater diameter at breast height (DBH) shall not be removed or relocated unless authorized by the director of public works and replaced as determined by the director of public works. Trees situated on public as well as private property shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the city. Trees that have a six-inch or greater DBH shall be shown on the development plan prepared by a certified arborist and shall include the following: a. Identification of species, diameter at breast height (DBH), and the condition of each tree;

10186 11 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

b. Methods of tree preservation as outlined in paragraphs (2), (3), (4) and (5) of this section; c. Proposed landscaping within drip lines; d. Tree replacement recommendations. 2. Trees to be retained on-site shall be encircled by a protective fence. In all cases, fencing shall be installed prior to commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, and shall remain in place throughout all phases of development. Fences may not be removed without first obtaining written authorization from the director of public works. The fence shall be placed outside of the tree root zones. General root zone estimates may be determined by one foot of radius per inch of trunk diameter at breast height (DBH). 3. To protect roots of nearby trees, all trees to be removed at the site shall be cut, rather than bulldozed, unless approved by the director of public works. If root loss is expected to occur, any root pruning is to be supervised by a certified arborist. If some root removal is necessary, the tree crown should be thinned. Thinning shall be supervised by the director of public works. Any vegetation to be removed adjacent to retained trees shall be cut at ground level by hand to prevent root injury to remaining trees. Any excavation near major roots shall be performed only by hand. 4. No structure or impervious paving should be located within the drip line or within a six-foot radius of the trunk perimeter, whichever is greater. A tree with a DBH of 30 inches or more shall require additional space as determined by the director of public works. Decks located above the root zones of retained trees shall be of post and beam construction to reduce the need for root pruning or removal. 5. All areas within the tree protection zones shall remain in natural states and grades. The following activities shall be prohibited within tree protection zones; construction, stockpiling of materials, parking, soil compaction or other such detrimental activities.

4.1.2 Migratory Bird Treaty Act

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) requires tree removal and potentially disturbing construction activities to occur during certain time periods to avoid harassment of nesting birds. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act prohibits the take of protected migratory birds and

10186 12 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report activities resulting in nest failure. As such, biological surveys should be conducted to provide clearance for project initiation.

4.2 Impacts

Tree impacts were determined using geographic information system technology and spatial locations of trees relative to the project impact areas (limits of grading). Impacts were further determined based on Dudek’s experience with native and non-native trees and their typical reactions to root disturbances from construction activities such as soil compaction, excavation, and remedial grading. The impact analysis results presented were used for developing appropriate mitigation measures for the project.

Impacts to trees can be classified as direct or indirect. Direct impacts to trees related to site improvements are typically the result of physical injuries or changes caused by machinery involved with the development process. Direct impacts include tree removal, root damage, soil excavation and compaction, grade changes, loss of canopy, and trunk wounds, among others. Indirect impacts to trees are the result of changes to the site that may cause tree decline, even when the tree is not directly injured. Indirect impacts include alterations to stream flow rates, diversion of groundwater flow, introduction of exotic plant species, and alterations to disturbance regimes. Wider-scale alterations to the area near trees, as well as specific changes that occur around the trees, are important considerations.

In general, there is a great deal of variation in tolerance to construction impacts among tree species, ages, and conditions. It is important to know how a certain tree, based on its species, age, and condition, would respond to different types of disturbance. The trees in the proposed project area are of varying ages and conditions. Mature specimens are typically more sensitive to root disturbance and grade changes. In general, healthy trees will respond better to changes in their growing environment. Trees of poor health or stressed conditions may not be vigorous enough to cope with direct or indirect impacts from construction activities.

Impact totals presented are based on conceptual disturbance limits, fuel modification zones, and development plans as of the date of this arborist report. As such, the actual number of trees that are subject to direct and indirect impacts may change as the detailed site planning process proceeds.

4.2.1 Direct Tree Impacts (Senior Village Center)

For the purposes of this arborist report, direct impacts are those associated with tree removal or encroachment within the tree-protected zone (canopy dripline plus 5 feet or 15 feet from trunk, whichever is greater). Tree removal is expected to be required when the trunk is located inside or within 2 feet of the proposed limits of grading. Encroachment is expected when soil and roots are

10186 13 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

disturbed within the tree-protected zone. Table 2 summarizes the number of trees by species that are expected to be subject to direct construction-related impacts. The locations of impacted trees are presented by impact type on the map in Appendix C, Tree Impact Exhibit. Measures to minimize the extent of impact to preserved trees are provided in Section 6.

Table 2 Summary of Direct Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Sidewalk Improvements

Scientific Name Common Name Removal Encroachment Cinnamonum camphora Camphor 1 0 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 10 0 Eucalyptus maculata Spotted gum 3 0 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 3 0 Eucalyptus spp. Eucalyptus 1 0 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 9 0 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacaranda 3 0 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 7 0 Other Other 1 0 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 6 0 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 92 0 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 17 0 Pinus pinea Stone pine 5 0 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian pepper 1 0 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 7 0 Totals 166 0

4.2.2 Indirect Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Reconfigured Golf Course

Indirect impacts to trees are the result of changes to the site that may cause tree decline, even when the tree is not directly injured. Site-wide changes affecting trees include diverting runoff and stormwater, creating retention and detention ponds, relocating streams or making improvements to streams, lowering or raising water tables, altering the capacity for soil moisture recharge, removing vegetation, or damming underground water flow (Matheny and Clark 1998). For the purposes of this arborist report, indirect tree impacts are expected for trees within 25 feet of the project’s limits of grading and not subject to removal or encroachment. Trees located in fuel modification zones are also typically considered indirectly impacted. Table 3 presents the number of trees expected to be indirectly impacted by the proposed project.

10186 14 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Table 3 Summary of Indirect Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Senior Village Center and Reconfigured Golf Course

Scientific Name Common Name Indirect Impact Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 8 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacaranda 1 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 45 Pinus eldarica Mondell pine 2 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 3 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 2 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen Palm 1 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 1 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 7 Total 72

4.2.2.1 Tree Impacts (Reconfigured Golf Course)

As stated earlier, direct impacts are those associated with tree removal or encroachment within the tree-protected zone (canopy dripline plus 5 feet or 15 feet from trunk, whichever is greater). Tree removal is expected to be required when the trunk is located inside or within 2 feet of the proposed limits of grading. Table 4 summarizes the number of trees by species that are expected to be subject to direct construction-related impacts. The locations of impacted trees are presented by impact type on the map in Appendix C, Tree Impact Exhibit. Measures to minimize the extent of impact to preserved trees are provided in Section 6.

Table 4 Summary of Direct Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Reconfigured Golf Course

Scientific Name Common Name Removal Encroachment Total Chamaerop humilis Mediterranean fan palm 1 0 1 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 0 1 1 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 14 18 32 Fraxinus velutina Arizona ash 3 0 3 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacaranda 6 1 7 Other Other 1 0 1 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 18 57 75 Pinus elderica Mondell pine 0 1 1 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 3 1 4

10186 15 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Table 4 Summary of Direct Tree Impacts (Protected Trees) – Reconfigured Golf Course

Scientific Name Common Name Removal Encroachment Total Pinus pinea Stone pine 3 2 5 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 3 0 3 Prunus spp. Plum 0 1 1 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 1 0 1 Syagrus romanzoffianum Queen palm 0 1 1 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 1 0 1 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 4 5 9 Totals 58 88 146

4.2.2.2 Tree Impact Summary – Protected Trees

In total, it is estimated that 224 (40%) protected trees will require removal due to direct impacts; 88 (16%) will experience encroachment into the tree protected zone; 72 (13%) will be indirectly impacted; and 166 (30%) will be preserved in place with no direct impacts. Additionally 4 (1%) protected trees are recommended for removal based on their health.

4.2.2.3 Tree Impact Summary - Non-Protected Trees

In total, it is estimated that 37 (79%) non-protected trees will require removal due to direct impacts; none (0%) will experience encroachment into the tree protected zone; 3 (6%) will be indirectly impacted; and 5 (11%) will be preserved in place with no direct impacts. Additionally 2 (4%) non-protected trees are recommended for removal based on their health.

4.2.2.4 Non-Project-Related Removals

There were 24 trees observed to be dead, 15 of which exceed the 6-inch DBH City Ordinance protected tree size criteria. In total, 11 would be impacted by the proposed project. The City Ordinance does not require replacement for dead trees. All 24 dead trees are recommended for removal based on their health rating.

10186 16 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

5 MITIGATION

Section 62-197 of the City’s Municipal Code (2002) identifies tree replacement standards for projects affecting protected trees. Specifically, the City’s Municipal Code (2002) states that the “applicant shall replace them with trees whose size, number, and planting location shall be determined by the director of public works before final occupancy is granted to any new residents. The size and age of the tree will determine how many new trees may be substituted for the destroyed tree, but as a minimum three new trees will replace one tree removed. The ratio may be increased at the discretion of the director.” The City’s Municipal Code does not require replacement for trees found to be dead or a nuisance.

5.1 Replacement Program Per City Ordinance

As discussed in this arborist report, tree impacts are based on the information provided to Dudek by the project owner in August 2018 and the results of Dudek’s site evaluation on February 13, 2017 and July 17, 2018. Based on the project’s limits of ground disturbance, 312 of the protected trees evaluated are expected to be directly impacted by the project (224 removals and 88 encroachments). Of the 312 trees requiring removal, 112 had observed health and/or structural ratings to be poor, critical, or dead. The 112 trees of poor, critical, or dead ratings (nuisance trees) do not require mitigation per the intent of the City Municipal Code. According to the City’s Municipal Code, the remaining 200 trees with good to fair ratings proposed for removal could be subject to a minimum 3:1 replacement ratio subject to the Director of Public Work’s discretion. Replacement at a 3:1 ratio for all 200 trees would result in planting 600 new trees. In determining the number of replacement trees, it should be noted that only two of the impacted trees, that are in good or fair health, are native or achieve a special status, such as oak trees; none of the trees are candidates for relocation; and 64% of the impacted trees have a fair rating. Appendix D – Tree Impact Exhibit: Mitigation Impact Trees provides a detailed overview of the 200 trees that require mitigation per the intent of the City’s Municipal Code. Furthermore, it should be noted that of the 200 trees requiring mitigation, 150 are direct removals and 50 are encroachments. The 50 encroachment trees will experience root impacts of varying degree, and root pruning some may not require removal.

Dudek recommends any replacement trees include a mixture of 5-gallon, 15-gallon, and 24- inch-box trees. Furthermore, Dudek recommends that the 600 replacement trees be suitable for the site and of a drought tolerant/resistant species. It is recommended that the 600 replacement trees be incorporated into the project within the post-development landscape as appropriate. Should it be determined that all 600 trees cannot be accommodated on site, Dudek recommends that California Grand Village Azusa Greens LLC work with the City to determine appropriate alternative planting locations or equivalent replacement.

10186 17 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

10186 18 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

6 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES

Dudek recommends the following measures to protect undisturbed trees that have protected zones within 20 feet of an active construction area. To the extent that protected trees on the proposed project site remain undisturbed, Dudek recommends similar tree protection measures for those retained trees.

6.1 Tree Protection Measures Prior to Construction

Fencing: Chain-link or orange-webbing polypropylene barricade fencing, no less than 4 feet high with tree protection signs, shall be erected around all undisturbed trees (or tree groups). The protective fence shall be installed at the protected zone boundary of each tree (or tree group), which is defined as 5 feet beyond the tree canopy dripline. Tree fencing shall be placed around trees that will be adjacent to construction-related activities. The intent of protection fencing is to prevent root damage and/or compaction by grading equipment. An ISA-certified arborist may be required on site if grading activities occur within the tree’s protected zone. The fencing shall be secured to 6-foot, heavy gauge t-bar line posts pounded into the ground a minimum of 18 inches and spaced a minimum of 8 feet on-center. Fencing shall be attached to t-bar posts with minimum 14-gauge wire fastened to the top, middle, and bottom of each post. Tree protection signs shall be attached to every fourth post. The contractor shall maintain the fence to keep it upright, taut, and aligned at all times. Fencing shall not be removed without obtaining written authorization from the director of public works.

Pre-construction Meeting: A pre-construction meeting shall be held between all contractors (including grading, tree removal/pruning, builders) and an ISA-certified arborist. The meeting shall focus on instructing the contractors about tree protection practices and answering any questions. All equipment operators and spotters, assistants, or those directing operators from the ground shall provide written acknowledgement of their receiving tree protection training. This training shall include information on the location and marking of protected trees, the necessity of preventing damage, and the discussion of work practices that shall accomplish damage prevention.

6.2 Protection and Maintenance During Construction

Once construction activities have begun, the following protection measures shall be adhered to:

Equipment Operation and Storage: Contractors shall avoid heavy equipment operation around the protected trees. Operating heavy machinery around the root zones of trees will increase soil compaction, which decreases soil aeration and subsequently reduces water penetration into the soil. All heavy equipment and vehicles shall, at minimum, stay out of the fenced protected tree zone, unless where specifically approved in writing and under the supervision of an ISA-certified arborist.

10186 19 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Materials Storage and Disposal: Contractors shall not store or discard any supply or material, including paint, lumber, or concrete overflow, within the protected zone and shall remove all foreign debris within the protected zone. However, the contractors shall leave the duff, mulch, chips, and leaves around the retained trees for water retention and nutrient supply. In addition, the contractors shall avoid drainage or leakage of equipment fluids near retained trees. Fluids such as gasoline, diesel, oils, hydraulics, brake and transmission fluids, paint, paint thinners, and glycol (antifreeze) shall be disposed of properly. The contractors shall ensure that equipment be parked at least 50 feet from the protected zone to avoid the possibility of leakage of equipment fluids into the soil. The effect of toxic equipment fluids on the retained trees could result in tree decline and/or mortality.

Grade Changes: Contractors shall ensure that grade changes, including adding fill, not be permitted within the protected zone without special written authorization and under supervision by an ISA-certified arborist. Lowering the grade within the protected zone would necessitate cutting main support and feeder roots, jeopardizing the health and structural integrity of the trees. Adding soil, even temporarily, on top of the existing grade would compact the soil further and decrease water and air availability to the tree roots. Contractors shall ensure that grade changes made outside of the protected tree zone do not create conditions that allow water to pond at the base of the tree. Water trapped at the base of a tree could lead to root rot and other detrimental tree impacts.

Moving Construction Materials: Contractors shall ensure that care be exercised when moving construction equipment or supplies near the undisturbed protected trees, especially overhead. Contractors shall ensure that damage to the trees be avoided when transporting or moving construction materials and working around the trees (even outside of the fenced protected zone). Contractors shall flag aboveground tree parts that could be damaged (e.g., low limbs, scaffold branches, trunks) with high-visibility flagging, such as florescent red or orange. If contact with the tree crown is unavoidable, conflicting branches may be pruned by an ISA-certified tree worker under supervision by an ISA-certified arborist and shall adhere to ISA standards.

Trenching: Except where specifically approved in writing beforehand, all trenching shall be outside of the fenced protected zone. Roots primarily extend in a horizontal direction, forming a support base to the tree that is similar to the base of a wineglass. Where trenching is necessary in areas that contain roots from retained trees, contractors shall use trenching techniques that include the use of either a root pruner (Dosko root pruner or equivalent) or an Air-Spade to limit root impacts. An ISA-certified arborist shall ensure that all pruning cuts be clean and sharp to minimize ripping, tearing, and fracturing of the root system. Root damage caused by backhoes, earthmovers, dozers, or graders is severe and may ultimately result in tree mortality.

10186 20 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Use of root pruning and Air-Spade equipment shall be accompanied only by hand tools to remove soil from trench locations. The trench shall be made no deeper than necessary.

Irrigation: Trees that have been substantially root pruned (30% or more of their root zone) will require irrigation for the first 12 months. The first irrigation should be within 48 hours of root pruning. Trees should be deep watered every 2 to 4 weeks during the summer and once a month during the winter (adjust accordingly with rainfall). One irrigation cycle should thoroughly soak the root zones of the trees to a depth of 3 feet. The soil should dry out between watering; a consistently wet soil should be avoided. One person should be designated as responsible for irrigating (deep watering) the trees. Soil moisture should be checked with a soil probe before irrigating. Irrigation is best accomplished by installing a temporary aboveground micro-spray system that will distribute water slowly (to avoid runoff) and evenly throughout the fenced protection zone but never soaking the area located within 6 feet of the tree trunk, especially during warmer months.

Canopy Pruning: The contractor shall not prune trees until all construction is completed, unless standard pruning would reduce conflict between canopy and equipment. This will help protect the tree canopies from damage. All pruning shall be conducted by an ISA-certified tree worker under supervision by an ISA-certified arborist and shall adhere to ISA pruning standards.

Canopy Washing: During construction, the contractor shall wash the foliage of trees adjacent to construction activity with a strong water stream every 2 weeks in early hours before 10:00 a.m. to control mite and insect populations.

Inspection: An ISA-certified arborist shall inspect the preserved trees adjacent to grading and construction activity on a monthly basis for the duration of the project. A report summarizing site conditions, observations, tree health, and recommendations for minimizing tree damage shall be submitted by the ISA-certified arborist following each inspection.

6.3 Maintenance After Construction

Mulch: A 4-inch mulch layer should be provided under the canopy of trees. Mulch should include clean, organic mulch that will provide long-term soil conditioning, soil moisture retention, and soil temperature control.

Pruning: The trees will not require regular pruning. Pruning should only be done to maintain clearance and remove broken, dead or diseased branches. Pruning shall only take place following a recommendation by an ISA-certified arborist and performed under the supervision of an ISA- certified arborist. No more than 20% of the canopy shall be removed at any one time. All pruning shall conform to ISAe standards.

10186 21 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

Watering: The trees should not require regular irrigation other than the 12 months following substantial root pruning, if applicable. However, soil probing shall be necessary to accurately monitor moisture levels. Especially in years with low winter rainfall, supplemental irrigation for the trees that sustained root pruning and any newly planted trees may be necessary.

Watering Adjacent Plant Material: All plants near the trees shall be compatible with water requirements of said trees. The surrounding plants should be watered infrequently with deep soaks and allowed to dry out in between watering, rather than with frequent light irrigation. The soil shall not be allowed to become saturated or stay continually wet. Irrigation spray shall not hit the trunk of any tree. A 60-inch dry-zone shall be maintained around all tree trunks. An aboveground micro- spray irrigation system is recommended over typical underground pop-up sprays.

Chemical Applications: If the trees are maintained in a healthy state, regular spraying for insect or disease control would not be necessary. If a problem does develop, an ISA-certified arborist/licensed pest control advisor or their representative shall be consulted because the trees may require application of insecticides to prevent the intrusion of bark-boring beetles and other invading pests. All chemical spraying shall be performed by a licensed applicator under the direction of a licensed pest control advisor.

Monitoring: An ISA-certified arborist shall inspect the trees retained on site for a period of 5 years following the completion of construction activity. Monitoring visits shall be completed quarterly, totaling 20 visits. Following each monitoring visit, a report summarizing site conditions, observations, tree health, and recommendations for promoting tree health shall be submitted. Additionally, any tree mortality shall be noted, and any tree dying during the monitoring period shall be replaced of the same species as specified for minimum replacement standards in this arborist report.

10186 22 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

7 CONCLUSIONS

Dudek inventoried and evaluated 601 trees of which 554 are considered protected by the City’s Municipal Code. Of the 554 protected trees, a total of 312 (56%) trees will be directly impacted by the proposed project, of which 112 had observed health and/or structural ratings to be poor, critical, or dead resulting in 200 trees that could be subject to replacement in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code. A 3:1 ratio for all 200 trees would result in planting 600 new trees. Dudek recommends that any tree replacements be completed with a mixture of 5-gallon, 15- gallon, and 24-inch-box trees. Should it be determined that all 600 trees cannot be accommodated on site, Dudek recommends that California Grand Village Azusa Greens LLC work with the City to determine alternative planting locations or equivalent replacement.

Finally, this arborist report recommends that the 166 (30%) undisturbed protected trees and 72 (13%) indirectly impacted protected trees be subject to protection measures that, when implemented, minimize the possibility that trees are inadvertently damaged during the construction process. It is also recommended, that the 50 encroachment trees be further evaluated, by and ISA certified arborist, for root impact levels at the time active grading to determine if any can be preserved in place. Lastly, Dudek recommends removal of the 24 dead trees (15 protected and 9 not protected; 11 potentially impacted) found on site.

Arborist’s Statement

This arborist report provides conclusions and recommendations based on a visual examination of the trees and surrounding site by an ISA-certified arborist and reasonable reliance on the completeness and accuracy of the information provided to the arborist. The examination did not include subterranean or internal examination of the trees.

Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees; recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees; and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Although trees provide many benefits to those who live near them, they also include inherent risks from breakage or failure that can be minimized but not eliminated.

Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms subject to attack by disease, insects, fungi, weather, and other forces of nature, and conditions that lead to failure are often hidden within trees and belowground. There are some inherent risks with trees that cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty, even by a skilled and experienced arborist. Arborists cannot predict acts of nature, including storms of sufficient strength, which can cause even an apparently healthy tree to fail. Additionally, arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all

10186 23 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report circumstances or for any specific period of time. A tree’s condition could change over a short or long period of time due to climatic, environmental, and other conditions. Further, there is no guarantee or certainty that recommendations or efforts to correct unsafe conditions will prevent future breakage or failure of a tree.

To live or work near trees is to accept some degree of risk. Neither the author of this report nor Dudek assumes any responsibility for, nor will they be liable for, any claims, losses, or damages to any tree; death or injury to any person; or any loss of, or damage to, any personal or real property.

10186 24 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

8 REFERENCES

City of Azusa. 2002. “Chapter 62, Article IV, Tree Preservation.” In City of Azusa Municipal Code. Ordinance 02-03. February 19, 2002. Accessed March 13, 2017. https://www.municode.com/library/ca/azusa/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCO_ CH62STSIOTPUPL_ARTVITRPR.

ISA (International Society of Arboriculture). 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal. 9th ed. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers.

Matheny, N., and J.R. Clark. 1998. Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees During Land Development. International Society of Arboriculture. June 1, 1998.

10186 25 August 2018 California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

10186 26 August 2018

APPENDIX A Tree Location Exhibit

Project Site Tree Locations Botanical Name Chamaerops humilis Cinnamonum camphora Eucalyptus citriodora Eucalyptus maculata Eucalyptus rudis Eucalyptus sp. Fraxinus uhdei Fraxinus velutina Jacaranda mimiosifolia Myoporum laetum Other Phoenix canariensis Pinus canariensis Pinus eldarica Pinus halepensis Pinus pinea Platanus racemosa Prunus sp. Quercus agrifolia Schinus terebinthifolius Syagrus romanzoffinum Washingtonia filifera Washingtonia robusta

0 75 150 Feet

SOURCE: AERIAL - BING MAPPING SERVICE APPENDIX A Tree Locations

California Grand Village Azusa Greens - Arborist Report Date: 3/14/2017 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX B Tree Locations.mxd Tree B Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX Path: - lterry by: saved Last - 3/14/2017 Date:

APPENDIX B Tree Data Matrix

Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 18.00 18 40 35 Good Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143282 -117.9248 2 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 9.00 9 20 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143239 -117.9248 3 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 18.00 18 45 40 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143174 -117.9248 4 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 15 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143129 -117.9248 5 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 22.00 22 30 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143079 -117.9248 6 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 25 Good Good Good Good Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143049 -117.9248 7 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 40 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143009 -117.9248 8 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 35 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143003 -117.9248 9 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 20 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142993 -117.9248 10 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 20 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142962 -117.9248 11 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 7.00 7 35 20 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142933 -117.9248 12 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 25 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142913 -117.9248 13 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 55 20 Good Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142869 -117.9248 14 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 1 9.00 9 20 15 Good Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142855 -117.9248 15 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 20 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142835 -117.9248 16 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 45 15 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142803 -117.9248 17 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 1 12.00 12 20 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14276 -117.9248 18 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 15.00 15 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142751 -117.9248 19 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 9.00 9 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142736 -117.9248 20 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142716 -117.9248 21 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 14.00 14 55 25 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142688 -117.9248 22 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 50 20 Good Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142671 -117.9248 23 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 50 15 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142653 -117.9248 24 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 5.00 5 25 5 Good Good Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14264 -117.9248 25 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 2 21.10 11 18 35 40 Good Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142613 -117.9248 26 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 7.00 7 25 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14259 -117.9248 27 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 40 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142571 -117.9248 28 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 5.00 5 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142556 -117.9248 29 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 40 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142523 -117.9248 30 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 28.00 28 55 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142519 -117.9248 31 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 2 3.61 2 3 15 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142446 -117.9248 32 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 16.00 16 50 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142376 -117.9248 33 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 30.00 30 55 50 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142351 -117.9248 34 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 5.00 5 20 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142328 -117.9248 35 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 10 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142288 -117.9248 36 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 35 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142262 -117.9248 37 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 25 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142247 -117.9248 38 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 10 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142215 -117.9248 39 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 5.00 5 20 15 Good Good Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142178 -117.9248 40 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 4.00 4 25 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142159 -117.9248 41 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.83 3 3 4 10 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142254 -117.9249 42 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 21.00 21 60 40 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142212 -117.9248 43 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 6.00 4 2 4 10 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142179 -117.9248

1 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 44 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 19.00 19 55 35 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142154 -117.9249 45 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 21.00 21 50 30 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.14212 -117.9249 46 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.39 4 3 2 10 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142054 -117.9248 47 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 4 6.71 4 3 2 4 15 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141967 -117.9249 48 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.39 4 3 2 10 10 Fair Dead Fair Dead No Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.141931 -117.9248 49 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 15 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142127 -117.9248 50 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 5 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142111 -117.9248 51 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142089 -117.9248 52 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 25 10 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14206 -117.9248 53 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 50 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142035 -117.9248 54 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142022 -117.9248 55 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141993 -117.9248 56 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 15 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141975 -117.9248 57 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 20 10 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141949 -117.9248 58 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 35 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141931 -117.9248 59 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 40 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141917 -117.9248 60 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 55 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141885 -117.9248 61 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 4.00 4 20 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141872 -117.9248 62 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 25 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141849 -117.9248 63 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 30 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141841 -117.9248 64 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141811 -117.9248 65 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14178 -117.9248 66 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141728 -117.9248 67 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 14.00 14 50 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141719 -117.9248 68 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 12.00 12 45 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141684 -117.9248 69 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 4.00 4 10 5 Dead Dead Dead Dead No Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.141673 -117.9248 70 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141687 -117.9248 71 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 18.00 18 60 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141672 -117.9248 72 Other Other 5 14.49 8 6 7 6 5 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141621 -117.9248 73 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 3.00 3 10 5 Dead Dead Dead Dead No Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.141578 -117.9248 74 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 35 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141577 -117.9248 75 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 19.00 19 70 35 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141557 -117.9248 76 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 7.00 7 35 10 Good Good Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141548 -117.9248 77 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 4.69 3 3 2 10 5 Critical Dead Poor Dead No Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.141535 -117.9248 78 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14152 -117.9248 79 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 60 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141474 -117.9248 80 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141418 -117.9248 81 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141385 -117.9248 82 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.141346 -117.9248 83 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.141308 -117.9248 84 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141272 -117.9248 85 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 23.00 23 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141228 -117.9248 86 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141175 -117.9248

2 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 87 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 3.61 3 2 10 10 Dead Dead Dead Dead No Indirect No None - Dead 34.141168 -117.9248 88 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 55 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141166 -117.9248 89 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.39 4 2 3 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.141145 -117.9248 90 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 60 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.141123 -117.9248 91 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 50 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141073 -117.9248 92 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141035 -117.9248 93 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 30 25 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.140988 -117.9248 94 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140953 -117.9248 95 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 13.00 13 45 25 Poor Critical Fair Fair Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.140961 -117.9248 96 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 5.00 5 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Protect in Place No n/a 34.14094 -117.9248 97 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 10 14.93 7 7 8 6 4 3 15 10 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140902 -117.9248 98 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 4.00 4 15 5 Poor Poor Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140881 -117.9248 99 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 7.00 7 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140854 -117.9248 100 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 13.00 13 40 25 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140824 -117.9247 101 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 25 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.1408 -117.9248 102 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 4.12 2 3 2 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140814 -117.9248 103 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 3.61 2 3 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140791 -117.9248 104 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 7.81 5 6 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140771 -117.9248 105 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 5.00 4 3 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140766 -117.9248 106 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 17.69 13 12 45 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14077 -117.9247 107 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140751 -117.9248 108 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 7.07 5 5 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140744 -117.9248 109 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 3.00 3 10 5 Dead Dead Dead Dead No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Dead 34.140716 -117.9248 110 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140676 -117.9248 111 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 14.00 14 15 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140661 -117.9249 112 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.39 4 3 2 10 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.140635 -117.9248 113 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140654 -117.9248 114 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140585 -117.9248 115 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 45 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14054 -117.9248 116 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140509 -117.9248 117 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 6.00 2 4 4 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140484 -117.9248 118 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140458 -117.9248 119 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140403 -117.9248 120 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.83 4 3 3 10 10 Fair Poor Poor Poor No Protect in Place No n/a 34.140392 -117.9248 121 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 3 5.83 4 3 3 10 10 Dead Dead Dead Dead No Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.140369 -117.9248 122 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140368 -117.9248 123 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 4.00 4 10 5 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Protect in Place No n/a 34.140332 -117.9248 124 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 22.00 22 40 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140307 -117.9248 125 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 7.00 7 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140297 -117.9248 126 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 32.00 32 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140252 -117.9248 127 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 6.00 6 30 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140238 -117.9248 128 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 30 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140201 -117.9248 129 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 30.00 30 40 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140184 -117.9248

3 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 130 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 27.00 27 50 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140157 -117.9248 131 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140092 -117.9248 132 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140055 -117.9247 133 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 25 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140028 -117.9248 134 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140014 -117.9247 135 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139964 -117.9248 136 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139936 -117.9247 137 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 24.00 24 40 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142434 -117.9249 138 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 24.00 24 10 15 Dead Dead Dead Dead Yes Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.14248 -117.9248 139 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 6.00 6 10 15 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142909 -117.9248 140 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 5.66 4 4 10 15 Poor Poor Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142938 -117.9249 141 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 5.66 4 4 10 10 Poor Critical Poor Poor No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142979 -117.9248 142 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 5.66 4 4 10 10 Poor Dead Poor Dead No Removal-Development No None - Dead 34.142996 -117.9248 143 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 2 5.66 4 4 10 10 Poor Critical Fair Fair No Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143031 -117.9249 144 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 15.00 15 35 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143196 -117.9247 145 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 45 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143202 -117.9247 146 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 16.00 16 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143162 -117.9246 147 Pinus pinea Stone pine 2 24.60 22 11 40 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143177 -117.9246 148 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 9.00 9 15 5 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143159 -117.9245 149 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 31.00 31 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143156 -117.9245 150 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 10.00 10 30 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143165 -117.9244 151 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 21.00 21 35 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143139 -117.9243 152 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 9.00 9 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14318 -117.9242 153 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 9.00 9 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143155 -117.9242 154 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 9.00 9 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143133 -117.9242 155 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 17.00 17 30 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143179 -117.9242 156 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 13.00 13 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143108 -117.9241 157 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 6.00 6 10 15 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143255 -117.9245 158 Myoporum laetum Myoporum 1 7.07 4 3 3 4 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.143204 -117.924 159 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14319 -117.924 160 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143137 -117.924 161 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143082 -117.924 162 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 55 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143035 -117.924 163 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 50 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142986 -117.924 164 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 55 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142917 -117.924 165 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 20 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142869 -117.924 166 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142823 -117.924 167 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 55 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142768 -117.924 168 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 45 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142718 -117.924 169 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 50 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142638 -117.924 170 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 50 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142593 -117.924 171 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 50 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142538 -117.924 172 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 50 10 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.14247 -117.9239

4 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 173 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 40 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142436 -117.9239 174 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 10 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142367 -117.9239 175 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 50 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142315 -117.9239 176 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142272 -117.9239 177 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 15 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142219 -117.9239 178 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 45 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142184 -117.9239 179 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 55 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142129 -117.9239 180 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 10 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142048 -117.9239 181 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 7.00 7 45 10 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142006 -117.9239 182 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 55 10 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141957 -117.9239 183 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 13.00 13 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141951 -117.9239 184 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141898 -117.9239 185 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 15 Poor Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.141802 -117.9239 186 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141758 -117.9238 187 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141702 -117.9238 188 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 30 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141602 -117.9238 189 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141563 -117.9238 190 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141512 -117.9238 191 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141455 -117.9238 192 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 70 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141405 -117.9238 193 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 70 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.141339 -117.9238 194 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141283 -117.9238 195 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 70 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141178 -117.9237 196 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141121 -117.9237 197 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141111 -117.9238 198 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141058 -117.9237 199 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141033 -117.9238 200 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141014 -117.9237 201 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140944 -117.9237 202 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140894 -117.9237 203 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140829 -117.9237 204 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140807 -117.9237 205 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 12.00 12 20 15 Critical Dead Fair Dead Yes Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.140835 -117.9238 206 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 14.00 14 20 15 Poor Critical Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140882 -117.9239 207 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 32.00 32 30 30 Dead Dead Fair Dead Yes Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.141014 -117.9239 208 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.141205 -117.9238 209 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 17.00 17 55 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No n/a 34.141253 -117.9239 210 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141438 -117.9238 211 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141502 -117.9239 212 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 55 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141563 -117.9239 213 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 55 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141605 -117.9239 214 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141627 -117.924 215 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141672 -117.924

5 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 216 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 65 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141748 -117.924 217 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141824 -117.924 218 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141868 -117.924 219 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141947 -117.924 220 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141956 -117.924 221 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142024 -117.924 222 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 70 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142096 -117.924 223 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 65 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142079 -117.924 224 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142143 -117.924 225 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142218 -117.924 226 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 5.00 5 30 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142289 -117.924 227 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 35 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142318 -117.924 228 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142384 -117.924 229 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 50 20 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142476 -117.924 230 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142572 -117.924 231 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142729 -117.924 232 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 20.00 20 65 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.143059 -117.9243 233 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 21.00 21 65 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142957 -117.9243 234 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 21.00 21 65 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142697 -117.9243 235 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 18.00 18 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142623 -117.9242 236 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 1 22.00 22 65 40 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.14251 -117.9243 237 Eucalyptus maculata Spotted gum 1 22.00 22 65 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142472 -117.9243 238 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 22.00 22 70 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142424 -117.9243 239 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 15.00 15 25 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142343 -117.9244 240 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 15.00 15 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.142266 -117.9243 241 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 1 16.00 16 45 30 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No None - Poor Condition 34.142183 -117.9243 242 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 18.00 18 65 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14209 -117.9243 243 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 1 23.00 23 55 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.14205 -117.9243 244 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 13.00 13 35 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141996 -117.9243 245 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 20.00 20 75 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141962 -117.9244 246 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 21.00 21 75 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141905 -117.9244 247 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 20.00 20 75 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141817 -117.9243 248 Eucalyptus maculata Spotted gum 1 20.00 20 75 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141709 -117.9244 249 Eucalyptus maculata Spotted gum 1 18.00 18 60 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141572 -117.9244 250 Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus spp. 1 20.00 20 65 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Development No 3:1 34.141372 -117.9244 251 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 18.00 18 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14118 -117.9244 252 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 18.00 18 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141194 -117.9243 253 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 20.00 20 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141156 -117.9243 254 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 20.00 20 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141157 -117.9243 255 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 18.00 18 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141169 -117.9242 256 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141175 -117.9241 257 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141206 -117.924 258 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141302 -117.924

6 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 259 Phoenix canariensis Canary island palm 1 12.00 12 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141251 -117.924 260 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 20.00 20 55 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.141154 -117.924 261 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 20.00 20 10 10 Dead Dead Fair Dead Yes Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.141075 -117.924 262 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 20.00 20 65 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141016 -117.924 263 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 32.00 32 65 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.141041 -117.9241 264 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 5.00 5 15 5 Dead Dead Fair Dead No Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.14114 -117.9244 265 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 16.00 16 40 35 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.141036 -117.9247 266 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 40 35 Poor Dead Fair Dead Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.140959 -117.9246 267 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 15 10 Dead Dead Fair Dead Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.140972 -117.9245 268 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 15.00 15 35 30 Poor Dead Fair Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.140869 -117.9246 269 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.14085 -117.9245 270 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140851 -117.9244 271 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140804 -117.9245 272 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 30 Dead Dead Fair Dead Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.14078 -117.9244 273 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140758 -117.9245 274 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140724 -117.9245 275 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 2 19.80 14 14 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140761 -117.9246 276 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140714 -117.9246 277 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140631 -117.9247 278 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140377 -117.9246 279 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 18.00 18 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140489 -117.9245 280 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 21.00 21 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140542 -117.9244 281 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 18.00 18 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140563 -117.9245 282 Pinus eldarica Afghan pine 1 18.00 18 35 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140635 -117.9245 283 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 35.00 35 45 30 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140563 -117.9243 284 Chamaerops humilis Windmill palm 1 6.00 6 15 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140599 -117.9241 285 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 1 14.00 14 15 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes 3:1 34.140659 -117.9241 286 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 20.00 20 50 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140541 -117.9239 287 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 35.00 35 55 55 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140525 -117.9238 288 Fraxinus velutina Arizona ash 1 8.00 8 20 15 Poor Critical Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.140793 -117.9237 289 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 50 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140806 -117.9237 290 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 45 30 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.14079 -117.9236 291 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 30 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.14078 -117.9235 292 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140798 -117.9235 293 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 26.00 26 50 50 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140796 -117.9234 294 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 8.00 8 25 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.1408 -117.9234 295 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 24.00 24 60 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140797 -117.9233 296 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 1 18.00 18 40 30 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140809 -117.9232 297 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 45 15 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140802 -117.9232 298 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 24.00 24 55 50 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140792 -117.9232 299 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140808 -117.9231 300 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140789 -117.923 301 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.1408 -117.9229

7 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 302 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140796 -117.9228 303 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140801 -117.9228 304 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140809 -117.9227 305 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140789 -117.9226 306 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140788 -117.9226 307 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140804 -117.9225 308 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140812 -117.9224 309 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140802 -117.9224 310 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 4 30.51 16 15 15 15 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place n/a 34.140802 -117.9224 311 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140795 -117.9223 312 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 3 29.48 18 17 16 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place n/a 34.140791 -117.9223 313 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14081 -117.9223 314 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140794 -117.9222 315 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140799 -117.9221 316 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140802 -117.9221 317 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14079 -117.922 318 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 23.00 23 65 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140787 -117.922 319 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140794 -117.922 320 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140776 -117.9219 321 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140798 -117.9218 322 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 20.00 20 65 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140764 -117.9218 323 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140815 -117.9218 324 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140793 -117.9217 325 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 25 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140799 -117.9216 326 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140806 -117.9215 327 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140789 -117.9215 328 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 8.00 8 25 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140789 -117.9214 329 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 1 14.00 14 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place Yes n/a 34.140806 -117.9214 330 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 40 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140806 -117.9214 331 Washingtonia filifera California fan palm 2 18.38 13 13 60 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect Yes n/a 34.140798 -117.9213 332 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140808 -117.9213 333 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.1408 -117.9212 334 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140789 -117.9212 335 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140768 -117.9211 336 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 50 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140768 -117.921 337 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 50 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140756 -117.921 338 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140743 -117.9209 339 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140746 -117.9208 340 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 20.00 20 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140731 -117.9208 341 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140726 -117.9207 342 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140716 -117.9206 343 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140712 -117.9206 344 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 55 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140697 -117.9205

8 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 345 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 18.00 18 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140699 -117.9205 346 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 40 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140718 -117.9205 347 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 40 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140691 -117.9204 348 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140692 -117.9204 349 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.14069 -117.9203 350 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 8.00 8 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140675 -117.9203 351 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 55 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140666 -117.9203 352 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 22.00 22 65 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140675 -117.9202 353 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 35 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140669 -117.9202 354 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140622 -117.9201 355 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140619 -117.9201 356 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 20.00 20 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140627 -117.92 357 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140637 -117.9199 358 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140644 -117.9199 359 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140629 -117.9198 360 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140608 -117.9198 361 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140608 -117.9197 362 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140583 -117.9196 363 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140585 -117.9195 364 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140579 -117.9195 365 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 22.00 22 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140584 -117.9194 366 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 60 30 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140563 -117.9194 367 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 50 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14056 -117.9193 368 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 3 13.42 10 8 4 30 25 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.14055 -117.9192 369 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 1 14.00 14 30 25 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140524 -117.9193 370 Fraxinus velutina Arizona ash 1 9.00 9 15 15 Poor Poor Fair Poor Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.140452 -117.9192 371 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 17.00 17 35 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.140396 -117.9192 372 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 16.00 16 35 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.140291 -117.9193 373 Platanus racemosa Western sycamore 1 18.00 18 40 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.14022 -117.9193 374 Fraxinus velutina Arizona ash 1 10.00 10 20 15 Poor Poor Fair Poor Yes Removal - Golf Course Yes None - Poor Condition 34.140182 -117.9194 375 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140072 -117.9196 376 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 50 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140107 -117.9196 377 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 50 45 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140193 -117.9195 378 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 45 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140242 -117.9194 379 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 50 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140265 -117.9194 380 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 40 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140253 -117.9193 381 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 2 7.07 5 5 15 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140292 -117.9193 382 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 3 8.12 5 5 4 15 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140342 -117.9193 383 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 3 8.12 5 5 4 15 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14041 -117.9193 384 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 34.00 34 45 35 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140196 -117.9198 385 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140267 -117.9198 386 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 40.00 40 45 50 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140214 -117.9199 387 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 35 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140225 -117.9201

9 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 388 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 26.00 26 50 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140246 -117.9203 389 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 28.00 28 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140253 -117.9205 390 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140322 -117.9206 391 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 50 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140216 -117.9206 392 Eucalyptus rudis Swamp gum 1 30.00 30 65 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140285 -117.9208 393 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 55 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140382 -117.9208 394 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 27.00 27 55 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140298 -117.921 395 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 30.00 30 55 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140382 -117.921 396 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 3 24.84 14 14 15 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140354 -117.9211 397 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.80 14 14 60 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140408 -117.9212 398 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 13.00 13 45 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14039 -117.9212 399 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.85 13 15 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140391 -117.9213 400 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 21.21 15 15 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140431 -117.9214 401 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 13.00 13 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140392 -117.9214 402 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 14.00 14 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140406 -117.9214 403 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.80 14 14 45 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140448 -117.9214 404 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 15.00 15 45 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140423 -117.9216 405 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 31.00 31 55 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140473 -117.9217 406 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 1 5.00 5 10 5 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Indirect No n/a 34.140353 -117.9217 407 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 22.00 22 45 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14045 -117.9218 408 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 21.00 21 45 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140531 -117.9221 409 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 21.00 21 45 45 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140537 -117.9224 410 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 3 9.27 6 5 5 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140569 -117.9226 411 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 26.00 26 50 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140636 -117.9228 412 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 2 8.49 6 6 10 15 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140558 -117.9229 413 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 50 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140655 -117.9231 414 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 3 26.57 16 15 15 50 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140524 -117.9232 415 Other Other 1 7.00 7 15 20 Dead Dead Dead Dead Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.140691 -117.9232 416 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.85 15 13 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.14073 -117.9214 417 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.85 15 13 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140697 -117.9214 418 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 19.85 15 13 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140757 -117.9214 419 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 3 23.73 15 13 13 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140727 -117.9213 420 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 3 26.57 15 16 15 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140678 -117.9211 421 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 21.93 15 16 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140693 -117.921 422 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 2 21.93 15 16 65 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140642 -117.921 423 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 15.00 15 20 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140638 -117.921 424 Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm 4 30.51 15 15 16 15 60 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140666 -117.9209 425 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 15.00 15 20 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140639 -117.9202 426 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 15.00 15 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140197 -117.9192 427 Pinus pinea Stone pine 2 22.67 17 15 30 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140192 -117.9191 428 Pinus halepensis Allepo pine 2 22.67 17 15 30 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140126 -117.919 429 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 15 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14009 -117.9189 430 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 65 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140026 -117.9189

10 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 431 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 45 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139904 -117.9188 432 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139891 -117.9189 433 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139889 -117.9189 434 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.13989 -117.919 435 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 10 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139884 -117.919 436 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139885 -117.9191 437 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 40 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139887 -117.9191 438 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139883 -117.9192 439 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 30 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.13989 -117.9192 440 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139895 -117.9193 441 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139893 -117.9193 442 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139901 -117.9194 443 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139902 -117.9194 444 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139896 -117.9195 445 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139888 -117.9195 446 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139897 -117.9196 447 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139891 -117.9196 448 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139887 -117.9197 449 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139888 -117.9197 450 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139882 -117.9197 451 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139892 -117.9198 452 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139898 -117.9199 453 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139894 -117.9199 454 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139888 -117.92 455 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.13989 -117.9201 456 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139899 -117.9201 457 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139893 -117.9202 458 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139894 -117.9202 459 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139887 -117.9203 460 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139897 -117.9203 461 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139916 -117.9203 462 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139904 -117.9204 463 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139916 -117.9204 464 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139905 -117.9205 465 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139903 -117.9205 466 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9206 467 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.1399 -117.9207 468 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.1399 -117.9207 469 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139903 -117.9208 470 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139908 -117.9208 471 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139898 -117.9208 472 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139891 -117.9209 473 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139897 -117.921

11 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 474 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139896 -117.921 475 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Dead Poor Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.13989 -117.9211 476 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Critical Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139896 -117.9211 477 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139906 -117.9211 478 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139908 -117.9212 479 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139892 -117.9213 480 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139886 -117.9214 481 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139886 -117.9214 482 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139901 -117.9215 483 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139902 -117.9215 484 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139896 -117.9216 485 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139891 -117.9216 486 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.1399 -117.9217 487 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139904 -117.9218 488 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139903 -117.9218 489 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139902 -117.9219 490 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139908 -117.9219 491 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139913 -117.922 492 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139913 -117.922 493 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139907 -117.9221 494 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 9.00 9 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139897 -117.9221 495 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139898 -117.9222 496 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139904 -117.9222 497 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 25 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139902 -117.9223 498 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139903 -117.9223 499 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9224 500 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9224 501 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139892 -117.9225 502 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 22.00 22 30 35 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.13991 -117.9225 503 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 3.00 3 10 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9226 504 Pinus pinea Stone pine 1 24.00 24 40 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139918 -117.9226 505 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 20 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139925 -117.9227 506 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139904 -117.9227 507 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 6.00 6 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139895 -117.9228 508 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139905 -117.9228 509 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.1399 -117.9228 510 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139905 -117.9229 511 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139902 -117.923 512 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.1399 -117.923 513 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.13991 -117.9231 514 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139906 -117.9231 515 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139907 -117.9232 516 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 30 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139903 -117.9232

12 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 517 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139901 -117.9233 518 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.13991 -117.9233 519 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139913 -117.9234 520 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 30 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139908 -117.9234 521 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139903 -117.9235 522 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139898 -117.9236 523 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 25 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139911 -117.9236 524 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139914 -117.9236 525 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139907 -117.9237 526 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 20 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139922 -117.9237 527 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 20 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.13992 -117.9238 528 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 25 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139905 -117.9238 529 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 25 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139906 -117.9239 530 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 19.00 19 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.13991 -117.9239 531 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139902 -117.924 532 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 25 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139899 -117.9241 533 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139911 -117.9241 534 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 25 20 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139907 -117.9241 535 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 17.00 17 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.1399 -117.9242 536 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 18.00 18 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9242 537 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 25 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139907 -117.9243 538 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139906 -117.9243 539 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 20.00 20 55 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139947 -117.9244 540 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 20 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139901 -117.9244 541 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 12.00 12 20 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139899 -117.9244 542 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 20.00 20 60 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139962 -117.9244 543 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 20 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139927 -117.9245 544 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 10.00 10 25 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139903 -117.9245 545 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 15.00 15 45 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.1399 -117.9246 546 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 11.00 11 20 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139949 -117.9246 547 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139935 -117.9246 548 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139911 -117.9246 549 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 16.00 16 15 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139993 -117.9247 550 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 13.00 13 35 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139914 -117.9247 551 Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine 1 14.00 14 45 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139905 -117.9247 552 Cinnamonum camphora Cinnamon camphor 1 6.00 6 20 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139872 -117.9245 553 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 4 13.00 9 6 4 6 30 20 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139992 -117.9242 554 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 7.81 6 5 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139896 -117.9242 555 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 3.61 3 2 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139888 -117.9242 556 Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak 2 4.47 4 2 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk Yes None - Poor Condition 34.13989 -117.9239 557 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 3 5.39 4 2 3 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139885 -117.9239 558 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 5.00 5 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139878 -117.9239 559 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 3.00 3 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139872 -117.9238

13 Appendix B - Tree Information Matrix Individual Stem Tree Height Canopy Health Health July Structure Structure Native Botanical Name Common Name Stems Combined* Diameters (In.) Protected Disposition City Mitigation Ratio X Y No. (ft.) (ft.) 2017 2018 2017 July 2018 (Y/N) 1 2 3 4 5 6 560 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 3 7.07 5 4 3 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139873 -117.9238 561 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 2.00 2 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139876 -117.9238 562 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 3.16 3 1 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139877 -117.9238 563 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 25 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139905 -117.9238 564 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 7.00 7 15 10 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.13996 -117.9238 565 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 8 10.05 7 4 3 3 3 3 15 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139883 -117.9236 566 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 3 7.81 6 4 3 15 10 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139862 -117.9221 567 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.13987 -117.9221 568 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 13.00 13 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139907 -117.9219 569 Eucalyptus citriodora Lemon-scented gum 1 16.00 16 20 10 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139902 -117.9217 570 Prunus sp. Cherry spp. 1 6.00 6 20 10 Fair Critical Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139875 -117.9213 571 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 15 11.75 6 4 4 3 5 6 20 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139935 -117.9212 572 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 20 30 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139876 -117.9209 573 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 15 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Removal-Sidewalk No None - Poor Condition 34.139873 -117.9207 574 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 5 9.38 6 4 4 2 4 15 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No None - Poor Condition 34.139894 -117.9207 575 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 5 9.38 6 4 4 2 4 15 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139894 -117.9207 576 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 5.66 4 4 15 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor No Protect in Place No n/a 34.139872 -117.9205 577 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 4 6.71 4 4 3 2 15 15 Fair Poor Poor Poor Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.139878 -117.9205 578 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 4 6.71 4 4 3 2 15 15 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.13988 -117.9204 579 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 12 11.70 10 4 3 2 2 2 15 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Indirect No n/a 34.139886 -117.9203 580 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 12 11.70 10 4 3 2 2 2 15 25 Fair Fair Poor Poor Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.139889 -117.9199 581 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 3 11.49 10 4 4 15 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139875 -117.9197 582 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 2 13.04 11 7 20 20 Fair Dead Poor Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.139891 -117.9194 583 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 3 13.64 11 7 4 20 20 Fair Dead Fair Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.139904 -117.9194 584 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 20 20 Fair Dead Fair Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.139905 -117.9194 585 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 6.00 6 20 20 Fair Dead Fair Dead Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Dead 34.139901 -117.9194 586 Quercus agrifolia Coast live oak 1 3.00 3 10 10 Fair Fair Fair Fair No Removal-Sidewalk Yes 3:1 34.139862 -117.9192 587 Schinus terebinthifolius Brazillian pepper 2 9.22 6 7 20 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal-Sidewalk No 3:1 34.139877 -117.919 588 Jacaranda mimiosifolia Jacranda 5 14.18 6 7 4 6 8 20 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.139982 -117.921 589 Syagrus romanzoffinum Queen palm 1 9.00 9 15 5 Poor Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140068 -117.9213 590 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 15.00 15 30 20 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140062 -117.9214 591 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 14.00 14 30 20 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14009 -117.9216 592 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 18.00 18 35 35 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No None - Poor Condition 34.140068 -117.9217 593 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 10.00 10 20 15 Dead Dead Fair Dead Yes Remove - Dead No None - Dead 34.140036 -117.9218 594 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 23.00 23 50 45 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140069 -117.922 595 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 9.00 9 30 25 Fair Poor Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140044 -117.9224 596 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 15.00 15 35 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140005 -117.9229 597 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 30.00 30 45 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140101 -117.923 598 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 45 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Removal - Golf Course No 3:1 34.14001 -117.9232 599 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 24.00 24 45 25 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Encroachment - Golf Course No 3:1 34.140038 -117.9234 600 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 28.00 28 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Indirect No n/a 34.140031 -117.9236 601 Fraxinus uhdei Shamel ash 1 32.00 32 45 40 Fair Fair Fair Fair Yes Protect in Place No n/a 34.140037 -117.9238 * Sum of the squares formula

APPENDIX C Tree Impact Exhibit

1 157

2 145 158 144 159 152 155 3 147 146 150 148 149 153 151 154 160 156 161 5 232

6 162 7 9 163 8 233 10 12 164 139 11

165 13 14

15 166 16

167 17 18 231 19 168 20 234 21 22 23 169 235 25 170 26 230 27 171

29 236

138 30 237 229 172

173 137 238

228 32 174 33 239

227 175

240 176 36 37 225 177 42 241 178 43 44 224 179 45 222 242 51 223

52 243 180 53 221 54 181 244 55 56 245 47 220 182 57 219 58 59 246 184 60 218 62 217 63 247 64 185

186 65 216

66 67 248 187 68 70 215 71

214 72 213 188

249 74 212 189 75 76 190 78 211

79 ProjectSite_Paper 191 210 80 192 Overall Tree Impact Status

81 250 Protect in Place 82 193

258 83 194 Direct

84 259 209

85 Encraoched 257 208 252 251 195 86 255 256 253 254 260 Indirect 88 196 90 261 91 198 263 265 199 92 262 207 200

93 267 95 266 94 201

97 202 206 268 99 269 270 205 203 100 323 204 289 296 299 304 308 313 326 329 332 271 292 294 301 303 307 309 310 315 316 321 325 331 333 101 293 295 302 311 312 314 288 290 298 300 305 306 317 318 319 324 327 328 334 104 272 291 320 106 322 335 336 275 273 418 337 107 338 339 108 416 340 274 419 341 276 342 343 346 417 344 345 415 421 347348 349 110 420 350 352 353 111 424 351 285 413 422 358 411 423 425 357 113 277 282 356 359 354 355 360 361 284 362 363 365 114 364 410 281 283 366 367 412 368 280 286 409 408 115 287 414 369

117 116 279 405 118 407 403 370 400 404 119 402 397 383 371 401 399 398 395 393 278

per Coords.mxd per 122 396 382 390 124 125 394 381 372 392 385 379 126 389 380 388 378 127 387 391 386 373 128 384 377 426 427 374 129

130 428 376 131 597 591 429 375 594 592 590 589 132 595 601 599 593 600 430 133 134 598 596 549 553 588 135 542 564 546 539 547 571 136 543

551 538 537 460 550 548 545 541 540 536 529 528 526 525 524 523 522 521 520 519 518 517 516 515 513 512 511 510 509 508 505 504 497 493 491 487 469 467 579 448 584 544 535 534 533 532 531 530 527 565 514 507 506 501 500 499 498 496 495 494 492 490 489 568 488 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 474 473 472 471 470 468 575 466 465 464 463 462 461 459 458 457 456 455 454 452 451 450 449 446 445 443 441 439 437 502 569 475 578 453 581 447 444 442 440 438 436 435 434 433 432 431 552 567 570 554 560 566 573 580 587 Date: 8/7/2018 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX C Overall Tree Impacts 30x42 - Pa 30x42 Impacts Tree C Overall Z:\Projects\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX - lterry Path: by: - saved Last 8/7/2018 Date: SOURCE: AERIAL-BING MAPPING SERVICE APPENDIX C Overall Tree Impact Exhibit 0 25 50 100 Feet California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

APPENDIX D Tree Impact Exhibit: Mitigation Impact Trees

144, 15 145, 16 159, 14 147, 24.6 152, 9 150, 10 3, 18 153, 9 160, 13 146, 16 149, 31 151, 21 5, 22 154, 9 161, 19

6, 15 7, 9 232, 20 162, 13 9, 13 10, 15 8, 6 163, 10 233, 21 12, 15 164, 13 11, 7 166, 13 15, 15 16, 12 167, 12 17, 12 231, 15 18, 15 168, 8 19, 9 234, 21 20, 16 21, 14 235, 18 169, 11 23, 12 170, 16 25, 21.1 26, 7 27, 9 171, 14 230, 15 29, 9 237, 22 30, 28 173, 13 238, 22 137, 24 228, 14 32, 16 239, 15 227, 8 175, 11 33, 30 240, 15 176, 13 36, 9 225, 12 37, 6 42, 21 224, 12

51, 16 242, 18 222, 18 223, 9

52, 6 53, 11 221, 15 243, 23 54, 13 55, 9 245, 20 220, 16 244, 13 183, 13 246, 21 59, 10 219, 13 218, 16 60, 12 184, 10 247, 20 62, 9 63, 9 217, 11 64, 9 216, 18 186, 11 65, 13 67, 14 248, 20 66, 15 215, 15 187, 11 214, 16 70, 10 71, 18 188, 6 249, 18 72, 14.5 213, 12 75, 19 212, 10 189, 13 76, 7 Species Fraxinus uhdei Pinus pinea Disposition

190, 14 Chamaerops humilis 78, 15 211, 14 Removal Jacaranda mimiosifolia Schinus terebinthifolius 79, 11 191, 15 Eucalyptus citriodora Encroachment - Golf Course 80, 16 250, 20 210, 14 Phoenix canariensis Syagrus romanzoffinum 192, 17 82, 15 Eucalyptus maculata ProjectSite_Paper Pinus canariensis Washingtonia filifera 193, 15 Eucalyptus rudis 83, 17 209, 17 Pinus eldarica Washingtonia robusta #, # Tree ID, Combined dbh (inches) Eucalyptus sp. Pinus halepensis Other 208, 17 90, 19

203, 15 292, 6 295, 24 302, 17

289, 17 293, 26 300, 16 301, 16 303, 17

420, 26.6 285, 14 413, 24 282, 18 411, 26 359, 17 361, 15 284, 6 363, 19 365, 22 367, 10 286, 20 360, 15 287, 35 414, 26.6 408, 21 362, 19 364, 19 405, 31 366, 16 400, 21.2 407, 22 403, 19.8 398, 13 383, 8.1

402, 14 382, 8.1 Coords.mxd 399, 19.8 397, 19.8 401, 13 385, 22 379, 14 381, 7.1 387, 24 384, 34 380, 9 426, 15 427, 22.7

376, 15 597, 30 591, 14 429, 12 594, 23 599, 24 430, 15 598, 24 596, 15 375, 15 588, 14.2 cts\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX D Mit Tree Impacts 30x42 - Paper 30x42 Impacts Tree D Mit cts\J10186_AzusaGreen\Figures\APPX

439, 11 435, 13 434, 13 437, 14 441, 10 433, 11 443, 14 581, 11.5 431, 10

444, 14 442, 14 438, 12 432, 11 440, 12 436, 15 587, 9.2 Date: 8/7/2018 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Proje - lterry Path: by: - saved Last 8/7/2018 Date: SOURCE: AERIAL-BING MAPPING SERVICE APPENDIX D Protected Tree Impact Exhibit: Mitigation Impact Trees 0 25 50 100 Feet California Grand Village Azusa Greens Arborist Report

APPENDIX B

Representative Photographs of Vegetation Communities Appendix B – Representative Photographs of Vegetation Communities

Looking east at the Project site on the 10th street at the Ornamental Community.

Looking northeast at the Project site on the 10th street at the Ornamental Community.

Photos taken May 23, 2017 Appendix B – Representative Photographs of Vegetation Communities

Looking west across the Project site down the fairway of Hole 5 at the Golf Course Community.

Looking south down the fairway of Hole 6 at the Golf Course Community.

Photos taken May 23, 2017 Appendix B – Representative Photographs of Vegetation Communities

Looking southwest at the single structure onsite within the Developed/Disturbed Community.

Photos taken May 23, 2017 Appendix B – Representative Photographs of Vegetation Communities

Looking northwest at the Developed/Disturbed Community on the southeastern portion of the Project site.

Looking west at the Developed/Disturbed Community on the southeastern portion of the Project site.

Photos taken May 23, 2017

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX CC

Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

Appendix C – Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

APPENDIX C

Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

This table summarizes conclusions from analysis and field surveys regarding the potential occurrence of special status plant species within the Study Area. During the field surveys, the potential for special status plant species to occur within the Study Area was assessed based on the following criteria:

• Present: observed on the site during the field surveys, or recorded on-site by other qualified biologists.

• Known to Occur: observed on site in the recent past, but not observed during the most recent biological survey.

• High potential to occur: observed in similar habitat in the region by a qualified biologist or habitat on the site is a type often utilized by the species, and the site is within the known distribution and elevation range of the species.

• Moderate potential to occur: reported sightings in surrounding region, or the site is within the known distribution and elevation range of the species, and habitat on the site is a type occasionally used by the species.

• Low potential to occur: the site is within the known distribution and elevation range of the species, but habitat on the site is rarely used by the species or for which there are no known recorded occurrences of the species within or adjacent to the site.

• None: a focused study failed to detect the species or no suitable habitat is present.

• Unknown: the species’ distributional/elevation range and habitat are poorly known.

Even with field surveys, biologists assessed the probability of occurrence rather than make a definitive conclusion about species presence or absence. Failure to detect the presence of the species is not definitive, and may be due to variable effects associated with fire, rainfall patterns, and/or season.

Appendix C – Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

Special Status Plants: Potential to Occur within the Study Area

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area Astragalus brauntonii Braunton's milk- FE Occurs in recently burned and disturbed areas, usually None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study vetch CRPR: 1B.1 sandstone with carbonate layers. Habitat Area. Not observed during field survey. communities include chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill grasslands. Occurs at approximately 1,000-foot elevation range. Blooming period: January through August. Calochortus striatus alkali mariposa-lily CRPR: 1B.2 Alkaline areas in chaparral, chenopod scrub, None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Mojavean desert scrub, and meadows and seeps. Area. Not observed during field survey. Known from 230 feet to 5,000 feet MSL. Blooming period: April through June. Calochortus weedii intermediate CRPR: 1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study var. intermedius mariposa-lily grassland. Known from 590 to 2,800 feet MSL. Area. Not observed during field survey. Blooming period: June through July. Centromadia parryi southern tarplant CRPR: 1B.1 Known to occur marginally in marshes and swaps, None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area. Not observed during field survey. ssp. australis valley and foothill grasslands and vernal pool. Known from 200 to 1,150 feet MSL. Blooming period: May to November. Chorizanthe parryi Parry's CRPR: 1B.1 Dry sometimes sandy soils in chaparral and coastal None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study var. parryi spineflower scrub. Known from 100 to 5,700 feet MSL. Area. Not observed during field survey. Blooming period: Active April through June. Dodecahema Slender-horned FE, SE Occurs in sandy habitats including chaparral, None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study leptoceras spineflower CRPR: 1B.1 coastal scrub (alluvial fan), and cismontane Area. Not observed during field survey. woodland. Occurs at approximately 2,100-foot elevation range. Blooming period: April to June. Dudleya densiflora San Gabriel CRPR: 1B.1 Occurs in granitic, cliffs, and canyon walls. Habitats None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Mountains dudleya including chaparral, coastal scrub (alluvial fan), Area. Not observed during field survey. riparian woodland, and cismontane woodland. Known from 900 to 3,600 feet MSL. Blooming period: May to June. Dudleya multicaulis many-stemmed CRPR:1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, and valley and foothill None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study dudleya grassland. Often found on clay soils or granitic Area. Not observed during field survey. outcrops. Known from below 2,600 feet MSL. Blooming period: May through July.

Appendix C – Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area Horkelia cuneata mesa horkelia CRPR: 1B.1 Sandy or gravelly soils in chaparral and coastal None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study ssp. puberula scrub. Known from 400 to 5,400 feet MSL. Area. Not observed during field survey. Blooming period: February through September. Nemacladus Robbins' CRPR: 1B.2 Clear openings. Often occurs in chaparral and None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area. Not observed during field survey. secundiflorus var. nemacladus Valley and foothill grassland. Known from 1,000 to robbinsii 5,500 feet MSL. Blooming period: April through June. Ribes divaricatum Parish's CRPR: 1A Occurs in Riparian woodlands. Known from 210 to None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area. Not observed during field survey. var. parishii gooseberry 1,000 feet MSL. Blooming period: February through April. Senecio aphanactis Chaparral ragwort CRPR: 2B.2 Found in dry washes and canyons in association None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area. Not observed during field survey. with coastal sage scrub, and chaparral. This species is known to occur in disturbed areas especially after fires. Known from at 1,000 feet MSL. Blooming period: February through September. Symphyotrichum San Bernardino CRPR: 1B.2 Vernally moist sites; i.e..ditches, seeps, streams, None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study Area. Not observed during field survey. defoliatum aster within a variety of plant communities. Known from 300 to 4,000 feet MSL. Blooming period: July through November.

Legend Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listing Codes: federal listing is pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). FE = federally listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range. FT = federally listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is considered likely to become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the foreseeable future.

California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Listing Codes: state listing is pursuant to § 1904 (Native Plant Protection Act of 1977) and §2074.2 and §2075.5 (California Endangered Species Act of 1984) of the Fish and Game Code, relating to listing of Endangered, Threatened and Rare species of plants and animals. SE = state listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that are in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of their range. ST = state listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future.

California Rare Plant Ranks (Formerly known as CRPR Lists): the CRPR is a statewide, non-profit organization that maintains, with CDFG, an Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. In the spring of 2011, CRPR and CDFG officially changed the name “CRPR List” or “CRPR Ranks” to “California Rare Plant Rank” (or CPRP). This was done to reduce confusion over the fact that CRPR and CDFG jointly manage the Rare Plant Status Review Groups and the rank assignments are the product of a collaborative effort and not solely a CRPR assignment.

Appendix C – Special Status Plant Species Potential Occurrence Determination

CRPR: 1B - California Rare Plant Rank 1B (formerly List 1B): Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 1B meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Sections 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

CRPR: 2 - California Rare Plant Rank 2 (formerly List 2): Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California, But More Common Elsewhere. All of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 2 meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Sections 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. It is mandatory that they be fully considered during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

CRPR: 4 - California Rare Plant Rank 4 (formerly List 4): Plants of Limited Distribution - A Watch List. Very few of the plants constituting California Rare Plant Rank 4 meet the definitions of Sec. 1901, Chapter 10 (Native Plant Protection Act) or Secs. 2062 and 2067 (California Endangered Species Act) of the California Department of Fish and Game Code, and few, if any, are eligible for state listing. Nevertheless, many of them are significant locally, and CRPR and CDFG strongly recommend that California Rare Plant Rank 4 plants be evaluated for consideration during preparation of environmental documents relating to CEQA.

California Native Plant Society (CRPR ) Threat Ranks: The CRPR Threat Rank is an extension added onto the California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) and designates the level of endangerment by a 1 to 3 ranking with 1 being the most endangered and 3 being the least endangered. A Threat Rank is present for all California Rare Plant Rank 1B's, 2's, 4's, and the majority of California Rare Plant Rank 3's. California Rare Plant Rank 4 plants are seldom assigned a Threat Rank of 0.1, as they generally have large enough populations to not have significant threats to their continued existence in California; however, certain conditions exist to make the plant a species of concern and hence be assigned a California Rare Plant Rank. In addition, all California Rare Plant Rank 1A (presumed extinct in California), and some California Rare Plant Rank 3 (need more information) plants, which lack threat information, do not have a Threat Rank extension.

0.1 = seriously endangered in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened / high degree and immediacy of threat) 0.2 = fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened / moderate degree and immediacy of threat)

Sources: • CRPR Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CRPR 2017). • The Status of Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Plants and Animals of California, 2000–2004 (CDFG 2005). • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second edition (Baldwin et al. 2012). • RareFind, CDFW, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2017f). • State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California (CDFW 2017i).

APPENDIX D

Plant Species Recorded During the Field Survey Appendix D – Plant Species Recorded During the Field Survey

Appendix D contains the list of vascular plant taxa recorded during the biological survey conducted within the Study Area. Plant nomenclature and taxonomic order is based on The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, second Edition (Baldwin et al. 2012).

Appendix D Plant Species Observed during the Field Survey

Scientific Name Common Name Anacardiaceae Sumac or Cashew Family Rhus lancea* African sumac Schinus terebinthifolius* Brazilian peppertree

Asteraceae (Compositae) Sunflower Family Centaurea melitensis* tocalote (Malta star thistle)

Chenopodiaceae Goosefoot Family Salsola tragus* Russian thistle (tumbleweed)

Euphorbiaceae Spurge Family Ricinus communis* castor bean

Fagaceae Oak Family Quercus agrifolia coast live oak

Myrtaceae Myrtle Family Eucalyptus spp.* eucalyptus

Oleaceae Olive Family Fraxinus uhdei* Arizona ash Fraxinus velutina* Shamel ash

Pinaceae Pine Family Pinus canariensis* Canary Island pine Pinus halepensis* Aleppo pine Pinus pinea* Stone pine

Platanaceae Sycamore Family Platanus racemosa western sycamore

Solanaceae Nightshade Family Nicotiana glauca* tree tobacco

Appendix D – Plant Species Recorded During the Field Survey

Scientific Name Common Name Monocots Arecaceae (Palmae) Palm Family Phoenix canariensis* Canary Island Palm Syagrus romanzoffinum* Queen Palm Washingtonia filifera* California fan palm Washingtonia robusta* Mexican fan palm

Poaceae Grass Family Avena barbata* slender oat Bromus diandrus* ripgut grass Poa pratensis* Kentucky bluegrass Schismus barbatus* common Mediterranean grass

Legend * exotic plant species

APPENDIX E

Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

APPENDIX E

Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

This table summarizes conclusions from analysis and field surveys regarding the potential occurrence of special status wildlife species within the Study Area. During the field surveys, the potential for special status wildlife species to occur within the Study Area was assessed based on the following criteria:

• Present: observed on the site during the field surveys, or previously recorded on-site by other qualified biologists.

• Known to Occur: observed on site in the recent past, but not observed during the most recent biological survey.

• None: a focused study failed to detect the species or no suitable habitat is present.

• Unknown: the species’ distributional/elevation range and habitat are poorly known.

Even with field surveys, biologists assessed probability of occurrence rather than make definitive conclusions about species presence or absence. Failure to detect the species is not definitive, and may be due to variable effects associated with migration, weather, fire, and/or time of day and year.

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Special Status Wildlife: Potential to Occur within the Study Area

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area Accipiter cooperii Cooper’s hawk WL The Cooper’s hawk breeds primarily in riparian areas None. No suitable habitat occurs within the Study and oak woodlands and is most common in montane Area. Not observed during field survey. canyons. It frequents landscapes where wooded areas occur in patches and groves and often uses patchy woodlands and edges with snags for perching. Dense stands with moderate crown-depths are usually used for nesting. They hunt in broken woodland and habitat edges. Within the range in California, it most frequently uses dense stands of live oak, riparian deciduous or other forest habitats near water. They are also found and can breed in suburban and urban settings. Aimophila ruficeps southern California WL They are found on grass-covered hillsides, coastal sage None. Suitable habitat does not exist within canescens rufous-crowned scrub, and chaparral and often occur near the edges of Study Area. Not observed during field survey. sparrow the denser scrub and chaparral associations. Preference is shown for tracts of California sagebrush. Optimal habitat consists of sparse, low brush or grass, hilly slopes preferably interspersed with boulders and outcrops. The species may occur on steep grassy slopes without shrubs if rock outcrops are present. It is a very secretive species. Anaxyrus californicus Arroyo toad FE, SSC Breed, forage, and/or aestivate in aquatic habitats, None. Does not occur on site due to a lack of riparian, coastal sage scrub, oak, and chaparral habitats. breeding Pools, aquatic habitats, adjacent banks, Breeding pools must be open and shallow with minimal and riparian canopy. Not observed during field current, and with a sand or pea gravel substrate survey. overlain with sand or flocculent silt. Adjacent banks with sandy or gravely terraces and very little herbaceous cover for adult and juvenile foraging areas, within a moderate riparian canopy of cottonwood, willow, or oak. Antrozous pallidus pallid bat SSC, FSS, BLMS, A wide variety of habitats is occupied by pallid bats, None. Not expected to occur on site due to a including deserts, grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, lack of rocky areas for roosting. Not observed and forests form sea level up through mixed conifer during field survey. forests. They are most common in deserts, preferring areas of open, dry habitats, with rocky areas for

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area roosting and water nearby. Night roosts may be in more open sites, such as porches and open buildings. Pallid bats day roosts in deep rock crevices, tree hollows, mines, caves, and a variety of man-made structures. Arizona elegans California glossy SSC This species is found in a variety of habitats, primarily None. Suitable habitat does not exist within occidentalis snake arid scrub areas with sparse vegetation including Study Area. Not observed during field survey. chaparral and grasslands areas. Aspidoscelis tigris coastal whiptail SSC This species is found in a variety of habitats, primarily None. Not expected to occur on site due to a stejnegeri hot and dry open areas with sparse vegetation including lack of suitable habitat. Not observed during chaparral, woodland, and riparian areas. This field survey. subspecies is found in coastal southern California, north into Ventura County, and south into Baja California. Additional important habitat characteristics include Important habitat components include shrub cover with accumulated leaf litter, and an abundance of invertebrate prey, particularly termites. Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk ST, BLMS, BCC Swainson's hawks require large, open areas with Moderate. Suitable foraging habitat/nesting abundant prey in association with suitable nest trees. habitat including ornamental habitat occurs on Suitable foraging areas include native grasslands or site. Not observed during field survey. lightly grazed pastures and croplands, open deserts, sparse shrub lands. Swainson's hawks often nest peripherally to riparian systems of the valley, as well as utilizing lone trees or groves of trees, such as oaks, cottonwoods, walnuts and willows, adjacent to their hunting areas. In the Great Basin, they typically nest in juniper trees of juniper-sage flats not near riparian zones. Catostomus Santa Ana sucker FT, SSC Found in permanent streams with substrates that are None. Suitable habitat does not occur on site. santaanae generally coarse and consist of gravel rubble, and Not observed during field survey. boulders with growths of filamentous algae. Coccyzus americanus western yellow- FT, SE, FSS, BCC This species is an uncommon to rare summer resident None. Suitable habitat does not occur on site. occidentalis billed cuckoo of valley foothill and desert riparian habitats in Not observed during field survey. scattered locations in California. Formerly much more common and widespread throughout lowland California. Roosts and nests in densely foliaged,

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area deciduous trees and shrubs in extensive thickets, particularly willows. Empidonax traillii Southwestern FE, SE Riparian woodlands along streams and rivers with None. Suitable habitat does not occur on site. extimus willow flycatcher mature dense thickets of trees and shrubs. Not observed during field survey. Emys marmorata western pond SSC, BLMS, FSS Inhabits permanent or nearly permanent water below None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed turtle 1,830 meters (6000 feet) throughout California, west of during field survey. the Sierra Cascade. Eumops perotis western mastiff SSC, BLMS Western mastiff bats are found in a variety of habitats, None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed californicus bat such as semi-arid to arid habitats, including conifer and during field survey. deciduous woodlands, coastal scrub, annual and perennial grasslands, palm oases, chaparral, desert scrub, and urban, but the species’ distribution may be geomorphically determined, occurring primarily where there are significant rock features offering suitable roosting habitat. A cliff dwelling species, where maternity colonies of 30 to several hundred roost generally under exfoliating rock slabs and rock crevices along cliffs. Western mastiff bats can also be found in similar crevices in large boulders and buildings. When roosting in rock crevices they require a sizable drop from their roost in order to achieve flight. Western mastiff bats prefer deep crevices that are at least 15 or 20 feet above the ground. Foraging is concentrated around bodies of water but also includes coastal sage scrub, chaparral, and grassland habitats. Gila orcutti arroyo chub SSC, FSS Native to streams from Malibu Creek to San Luis Rey None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed River basin. Found in slow water stream sections with during field survey. mud or sand bottoms and feeds heavily on aquatic vegetation & associated invertebrates.

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area Icteria virens yellow-breasted SSC In southern California they are primarily found in tall, None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed chat dense, relatively wide riparian woodlands and thickets during field survey. of willows, vine tangles, and dense brush with well- developed understories. Nesting areas are associated with streams, swampy ground, and the borders of small ponds. Breeding habitat must be dense to provide shade and concealment. It winters south to Central America. Lasiurus xanthinus Western yellow SSC Roost in trees, hanging from the underside of a leaf. Low potential to occur onsite due to limited bat Commonly found in the southwestern U.S. roosting in palm trees found on site. Not observed during the skirt of dead fronds in both native and non- native field survey. palm trees and have also been documented roosting in cottonwood trees. Nyctinomops pocketed free- SSC This bat species prefers rocky desert areas with high None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed femorosaccus tailed bat cliffs or rock outcrops. Rock crevices in cliffs are during field survey. preferred as roosting sites, since the bat must drop from the roost to gain flight speed. Typically reproduces in rock crevices, caverns, or buildings. Ranges from southern California to New Mexico. Nyctinomops macrotis big free-tailed bat SSC The big free-tailed bat is rare in California. Records of None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed the species are from urban areas of San Diego County. during field survey. Isolated populations throughout southwestern U.S. Roosts in crevices and cliffs. This species generally prefers rugged, rocky terrain, found to 8000 feet, preferring forest and deserts. New Mexico, southern Arizona, and Texas. Probably a yearlong resident. Phrynosoma blainvillii coast horned lizard SSC, BLMS Occurs in a variety of vegetation types including coastal None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed sage scrub, chaparral, annual grassland, oak woodland during field survey. and riparian woodlands. Polioptila californica coastal California FT, SSC A non-migratory, permanent resident of coastal sage None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed californica gnatcatcher scrub habitat, which is a broad category of vegetation during field survey. that includes the following plant communities: Ventura coastal sage scrub, Diegan coastal sage scrub, maritime succulent scrub, Riversidean sage scrub, Riversidean

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area alluvial fan sage scrub, southern coastal bluff scrub, and coastal sage-chaparral scrub. They also use chaparral, grassland and riparian habitats next to coastal sage scrub, but these habitats are used dispersal and foraging. They avoid nesting on steep slopes. Riparia riparia bank swallow ST, BLMS Currently, bank swallows are locally common only in None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed restricted riparian and coastal portions of California during field survey. where sandy, fine-textured vertical bluffs, cliffs or banks are available for the birds to dig their burrows and nest in colonies. Setophaga petechial Yellow warbler SSC, BBC Riparian plant associations in close proximity to water. None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed Frequently found nesting and foraging in willow shrubs during field survey. and thickets, and in other riparian plants including cottonwoods, sycamores, ash, and alders. Taricha torosa Coast Range Newt SSC Wet forests, oak forests, chaparral and rolling None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed grasslands. during field survey. Taxidea taxus American badger SSC Badgers occur from alpine meadows to elevations as None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed low as Death Valley, which is below sea level. during field survey Essentially the badger is an animal of open places. It shuns forests. In California, badgers occupy a diversity of habitats. The principal requirements seem to be sufficient food, friable soils, and relatively open, uncultivated ground. Grasslands, savannas, openings in desert scrub, and grassy mountain meadows near timberline are preferred. They can also occur in treeless pastures and drained marshes. Badgers are generally associated with dry, open, treeless regions, prairies, parklands, and cold desert areas. They seem to occur primarily in areas of low to moderate slope. Thamnophis Two-striped garter SSC, BLMS Generally found around pools, creeks, cattle tanks, and None. Does not occur on site due to a lack of hammondii ssp. snake other water sources, often in rocky areas, in oak wetland habitats, streams, creeks, and pools. woodland, chaparral, brushland, and coniferous forest. Not observed during field survey Vireo bellii pusillus least Bell’s vireo FE, SE Least Bell’s vireos primarily occupy riverine riparian None. No suitable habitat on site. Not observed habitats that typically feature dense cover within 1-2 m during field survey. of the ground and a dense, stratified canopy. Typically,

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

Scientific Name Common Name Status General Habitat Description Potential for Occurrence within the Study Area it is associated with southern willow scrub, cottonwood-willow forest, mule fat scrub, sycamore alluvial woodland, coast live oak riparian forest, arroyo willow riparian forest, or mesquite in desert localities. It uses habitat which is limited to the immediate vicinity of water courses. 2,000 feet elevation in the interior. This species is generally restricted to major river systems in San Diego County.

Legend Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listing Codes: federal listing is pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended. The official federal listing of Endangered and Threatened Animals is published in the Federal Register, 50 CFR 17.11. FE = federally listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range. FT = federally listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that is considered likely to become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of its range within the foreseeable future. FC = federal candidate for listing. FPT = federally proposed threatened.

California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Listing Codes: state listing is pursuant to §2074.2 and §2075.5 (California Endangered Species Act of 1984) of the Fish and Game Code, relating to listing of Endangered, Threatened and Rare species of plants and animals. The official California listing of Endangered and Threatened animals is contained in the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, and Section 670.5. SE = state listed as endangered: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that are in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of their range. ST = state listed as threatened: any species, subspecies, or variety of plant or animal that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future. SCT = state candidate for listing as threatened.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW): SSC = species of special concern: status applies to animals which 1) are declining at a rate that could result in listing, or 2) historically occurred in low numbers and known threats to their persistence currently exist. The CDFW has designated certain vertebrate species as “species of special concern” because declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats have made them vulnerable to extinction. Fully protected: animal species may not be taken or possessed at any time and no licenses or permits may be issued for their take except for collecting these species for necessary scientific research and relocation of the bird species for the protection of livestock. WL = watch list: these birds have been designated as “Taxa to Watch” in the California Bird Species of Special Concern report (Shuford and Gardali 2008). The report defines “Taxa to Watch” as those that are not on the current special concern list that (1) formerly were on the 1978 (Remsen 1978) or 1992 (CDFG 1992) special concern lists and are

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination not currently listed as state threatened and endangered; (2) have been removed (delisted) from either the state or federal threatened and endangered lists (and remain on neither), or (3) are currently designated as “fully protected” in California.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS): BCC = USFWS bird of conservation concern: listed in the USFWS’S 2008 Birds of Conservation Concern report. The report identifies species, subspecies, and populations of all migratory non-game birds that, without additional conservation actions, are likely to become candidates for listing under the ESA. While all of the bird species included in the report are priorities for conservation action, the list makes no finding with regard to whether they warrant consideration for ESA listing.

United States Forest Service (USFS): FSS = Forest Service sensitive: those plant and animal species identified by a Regional Forester that are not listed or proposed for listing under the ESA and for which population viability is a concern, as evidenced by: (a) significant current or predicted downward trends in population numbers or density or (b) significant current or predicted downward trends in habitat capability that would reduce a species' existing distribution.”

United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM): BLMS = BLM sensitive: those plant and animal species on BLM administered lands and that are (1) under status review by the USFWS/NMFS; or (2) whose numbers are declining so rapidly that federal listing my become necessary, or (3) with typically small and widely dispersed populations; or (4) those inhabiting ecological refugia or other specialized or unique habitats. BLM policy is to provide the same level of protection as USFWS candidate species.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF): CDF: S = CDF sensitive: species is a California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection sensitive species. The Board of Forestry classifies as sensitive species those species that warrant special protection during timber operations.

Sources: • A Guide to the Reptiles and Amphibians of California (CaliforniaHerps.com 2017). • A Field Guide to Hawks of North America, Second Edition (Clark and Wheeler 2001). • Atlas of Breeding Birds, Orange County, California (Gallagher 1997). • Amphibian and Reptile Species of Special Concern in California (Jennings and Hayes 1994). • A Field Guide to Mammals of North America North of Mexico. Fourth Edition (Reid 2006). • A Natural History of California (Schoenherr 1992). • A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, Third Edition (Stebbins 2003). • Amphibian species accounts (Amphibiaweb 2017). • AOU website (AOU 2017). • California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California (Shuford and Gardali 2008). • Check-List of North American Birds, 7th edition (American Ornithologists' Union [AOU] 1998). • Complete Birds of North America (National Geographic Society 2006). • Field Guide to the Birds of North America, 4th Ed (National Geographic Society 2002).

Appendix E – Special Status Wildlife Potential Occurrence Determination

• Fifty-first supplement to the AOU Check-List of North American Birds (Chesser et. al. 2010). • Life History Accounts and Range Maps (CDFW 2017e). • Life on the Edge: A Guide to California’s Endangered Natural Resources. Wildlife (Thelander et al. 1994). • Mammals of North America (Bowers et al. 2004). • Mammals of California (Eder 2005). • Mammals of North America (Kays and Wilson 2002). • Mammalian Species of Special Concern in California (Williams 1986). • Mammal Species of the World (Wilson and Reeder 2005). • NatureServe Explorer (NatureServe 2017). • National Audubon Society, the Sibley Guide to Birds (Sibley 2000). • RareFind, CDFW, California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CDFW 2017). • Reference Atlas to the Birds of North America (National Geographic Society 2003). • Shorebirds of North America. The Photographic Guide (Paulson 2005). • Special Animals List (CDFW 2017h). • Standard Common and Current Scientific Names (Center for North American Herpetology website [CNAH] website 2017). • The Smithsonian Book of North American Mammals (Wilson and Ruff 1999). • Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California (Bolster 1998).