DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment K – Permittees and Tmdls Matrix K-1 MS4 Discharges Within the ORDER NO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment K – Permittees and Tmdls Matrix K-1 MS4 Discharges Within the ORDER NO MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ATTACHMENT K. PERMITTEES AND TMDLS MATRIX Note: For all tables in this Attachment, Permittees listed in italics are Multi-Jurisdictional Permittees. Table K-1: Santa Clara River Watershed Management Area TMDLs SANTA CLARA RIVER ACTIVE TMDLS WATERSHED Santa Clara River Upper Santa Clara Lake Elizabeth, Munz Lake, Santa Clara River Estuary and MANAGEMENT AREA Nitrogen Compounds River Chloride and Lake Hughes Trash Reaches 3, 5, 6, and 7 PERMITTEES TMDL TMDL TMDL Indicator Bacteria TMDL Los Angeles (County of) X X X X Los Angeles County Flood X X X Control Santa Clarita X X X Table K-2: Santa Monica Bay Watershed Management Area TMDLs ACTIVE TMDLS SANTA MONICA BAY Malibu Creek Subwatershed WATERSHED Santa Monica Santa Monica MANAGEMENT AREA Bay Beaches Bay Santa Monica Bay Malibu Creek and Malibu Creek Malibu Creek PERMITTEES Bacteria TMDL Nearshore and TMDL for DDTs and Lagoon Bacteria Watershed Nutrient TMDL (Wet and Dry Offshore PCBs TMDL Trash TMDL Weather) Debris TMDL Agoura Hills X X X X X X X X X Beverly Hills Calabasas X X X X X X X X X Culver City X X X El Segundo X X X Hermosa Beach Hidden Hills X X X X X X X X X Inglewood Los Angeles (City of) X X X Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-1 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ACTIVE TMDLS SANTA MONICA BAY Malibu Creek Subwatershed WATERSHED Santa Monica Santa Monica MANAGEMENT AREA Bay Beaches Bay Santa Monica Bay Malibu Creek and Malibu Creek Malibu Creek PERMITTEES Bacteria TMDL Nearshore and TMDL for DDTs and Lagoon Bacteria Watershed Nutrient TMDL (Wet and Dry Offshore PCBs TMDL Trash TMDL Weather) Debris TMDL Los Angeles (County X X X X X X of) Los Angeles County X X X X X X Flood Control Malibu X X X X X X Manhattan Beach X X X Palos Verdes Estates X X X Rancho Palos Verdes X X X Redondo Beach X X X Rolling Hills X X X Rolling Hills Estates X X X Santa Monica X X X Torrance X X X West Hollywood X X X Westlake Village X X X X X X Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-2 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 Table K-3: Santa Monica Bay Watershed Management Area TMDLs ACTIVE TMDLS SANTA MONICA Ballona Creek Subwatershed Marina del Rey Subwatershed BAY WATERSHED Ballona Ballona Creek Marina del Rey MANAGEMENT Ballona Creek Ballona Creek, Ballona Marina del Rey Wetlands TMDL for Harbor Mothers' AREA Creek Estuary Ballona estuary and Creek Harbor Toxic Sediment and Beach and Back PERMITTEES Trash Toxic Sepulveda Channel Metals Pollutants Invasive Exotic Basins Bacteria TMDL Pollutants Bacteria TMDL TMDL TMDL Vegetation TMDL TMDL Agoura Hills Beverly Hills X X X X X Calabasas Culver City X X X X X X X El Segundo Hermosa Beach Hidden Hills Inglewood X X X X X Los Angeles (City X X X X X X X of) Los Angeles X X X X X X X (County of) Los Angeles County Flood X X X X X X Control Malibu Manhattan Beach Palos Verdes Estates Rancho Palos Verdes Redondo Beach Rolling Hills Rolling Hills Estates Santa Monica X X X X X Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-3 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ACTIVE TMDLS SANTA MONICA Ballona Creek Subwatershed Marina del Rey Subwatershed BAY WATERSHED Ballona Ballona Creek Marina del Rey MANAGEMENT Ballona Creek Ballona Creek, Ballona Marina del Rey Wetlands TMDL for Harbor Mothers' AREA Creek Estuary Ballona estuary and Creek Harbor Toxic Sediment and Beach and Back PERMITTEES Trash Toxic Sepulveda Channel Metals Pollutants Invasive Exotic Basins Bacteria TMDL Pollutants Bacteria TMDL TMDL TMDL Vegetation TMDL TMDL Torrance West Hollywood X X X X X Westlake Village Table K-4: Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area TMDLs ACTIVE TMDLS DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL Dominguez Channel Machado Lake and Greater Los WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Los Angeles Harbor Machado Lake Machado Lake Pesticides and Angeles and Long AREA PERMITTEES Bacteria TMDL Trash TMDL Nutrient TMDL PCBs TMDL Beach Harbor Waters Toxic Pollutants TMDL 1 Carson X X X X Compton X El Segundo X Gardena X Hawthorne X Inglewood X Lawndale X Lomita X X X Los Angeles (City of) X X X X X Los Angeles (County of) X X X X X Los Angeles County Flood X X X X Control Manhattan Beach X Palos Verdes Estates X X X Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-4 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ACTIVE TMDLS DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL Dominguez Channel Machado Lake and Greater Los WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Los Angeles Harbor Machado Lake Machado Lake Pesticides and Angeles and Long AREA PERMITTEES Bacteria TMDL Trash TMDL Nutrient TMDL PCBs TMDL Beach Harbor Waters Toxic Pollutants TMDL 1 Rancho Palos Verdes X X X X Redondo Beach X X X X Rolling Hills X X X X Rolling Hills Estates X X X X Torrance X X X X 1 The requirements of this Order to implement the obligations of this TMDL do not apply to a Permittee to the extent that it is determined that the Permittee has been released from that obligation pursuant to the Amended Consent Decree entered in United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp. , Case No. 90-3122 AAH (JRx). Table K-5: Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area TMDLs ACTIVE TMDLS LOS ANGELES Los Angeles Dominguez Los Los Los Long Beach RIVER Los Angeles Area Lake Channel and Angeles Angeles Angeles City Beaches WATERSHED River Nitrogen TMDLs for Lake Greater Los River River and River Legg Lake and Los MANAGEMENT Compounds Calabasas, Echo Angeles and Long Watershed Tributaries Watershed Trash TMDL Angeles River AREA and Related Park Lake, Legg Beach Harbor Trash Metals Bacteria Estuary PERMITTEES Effects TMDL Lake and Peck Waters Toxic TMDL TMDL TMDL Bacteria TMDL 1 Road Park Lake Pollutants TMDL Alhambra X X X X Arcadia X X X X X Bell X X X X Bell Gardens X X X X Bradbury X X X X X Burbank X X X X Calabasas X X X X X Carson X X X X X Commerce X X X X Compton X X X X X Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-5 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ACTIVE TMDLS LOS ANGELES Los Angeles Dominguez Los Los Los Long Beach RIVER Los Angeles Area Lake Channel and Angeles Angeles Angeles City Beaches WATERSHED River Nitrogen TMDLs for Lake Greater Los River River and River Legg Lake and Los MANAGEMENT Compounds Calabasas, Echo Angeles and Long Watershed Tributaries Watershed Trash TMDL Angeles River AREA and Related Park Lake, Legg Beach Harbor Trash Metals Bacteria Estuary PERMITTEES Effects TMDL Lake and Peck Waters Toxic TMDL TMDL TMDL Bacteria TMDL 1 Road Park Lake Pollutants TMDL Cudahy X X X X Downey X X X X Duarte X X X X X El Monte X X X X X X Glendale X X X X Hidden Hills X X X X Huntington X X X X Park Irwindale X X X X X La Canada X X X X Flintridge Lakewood X X X Los Angeles X X X X X X (City of) Los Angeles X X X X X X X (County of) Los Angeles County Flood X X X X X X X Control Lynwood X X X X Maywood X X X X Monrovia X X X X X Montebello X X X X Monterey Park X X X X Paramount X X X X X Pasadena X X X X X X X X Pico Rivera Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-6 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO. R4-2012-0175 Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County NPDES NO. CAS004001 ACTIVE TMDLS LOS ANGELES Los Angeles Dominguez Los Los Los Long Beach RIVER Los Angeles Area Lake Channel and Angeles Angeles Angeles City Beaches WATERSHED River Nitrogen TMDLs for Lake Greater Los River River and River Legg Lake and Los MANAGEMENT Compounds Calabasas, Echo Angeles and Long Watershed Tributaries Watershed Trash TMDL Angeles River AREA and Related Park Lake, Legg Beach Harbor Trash Metals Bacteria Estuary PERMITTEES Effects TMDL Lake and Peck Waters Toxic TMDL TMDL TMDL Bacteria TMDL 1 Road Park Lake Pollutants TMDL Rosemead X X X X San Fernando X X X X San Gabriel X X X X San Marino X X X X Santa Clarita X X X X Sierra Madre X X X X X Signal Hill X X X X X X South El Monte X X X X X X South Gate X X X X South X X X X Pasadena Temple City X X X X Vernon X X X X 1 The requirements of this Order to implement the obligations of this TMDL do not apply to a Permittee to the extent that it is determined that the Permittee has been released from that obligation pursuant to the Amended Consent Decree entered in United States v. Montrose Chemical Corp. , Case No. 90-3122 AAH (JRx). Attachment K – Permittees and TMDLs Matrix K-7 MS4 Discharges within the ORDER NO.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drainage in Los Angeles
    •Ballona Creek Watershed• Drainage in Los Angeles Alice Wang The University of Texas at Austin Environmental and Water Resources Engineering GIS CE 394K | Fall 2016 | Dr. Maidment Drainage in Los Angeles: Ballona Creek Watershed Table of Contents LIST OF FIGURES 3 LIST OF TABLES 3 LIST OF EQUATIONS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 PROJECT SCOPE 5 OBJECTIVES 5 WATERSHED BACKGROUND 5 WATERSHED OVERVIEW 5 URBANIZATION IMPACTS 6 METHODOLOGY 9 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 9 NATIONAL WATER MODEL FORECAST 17 CONCLUSION 22 FUTURE WORK 22 REFERENCES 24 2 Drainage in Los Angeles: Ballona Creek Watershed List of Figures Figure 1. Ballona Creek Watershed Street Map View from LADPW ............................................................ 6 Figure 2. Pre-Development and Post-Development of Ballona Creek watershed (Braa et al., 2001) ......... 7 Figure 3. Conceptual water balance applicable to pre and post development of a given watershed ........ 7 Figure 4. Ballona Creek Channel from Aerial View ...................................................................................... 8 Figure 5. Land use distribution in Ballona Creeek watershed .................................................................... 10 Figure 6. ArcGis Pro Ballona Creek Watershed map of landcover ............................................................. 11 Figure 7. ArcGis Pro Ballona Creek Watershed Map of Landcover and NHDPlusV2 .................................. 12 Figure 8. Ballona Creek Watershed map with channelized tributaries from CA Waterboards ................. 12 Figure 9. ArcGIS
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About the Malibu Lagoon Restoration and Enhancement Plan
    FACTS ABOUT THE MALIBU LAGOON RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN The project is not intended to “clean up” the water quality for recreation, but it will have water quality benefits for the aquatic ecosystem. The lagoon is not healthy • The lagoon is listed on the federal 303(d) list of impaired water bodies, due to excess nutrients and low oxygen levels. • Data collected continuously since 2006 show oxygen levels are frequently below 5 mg per liter, a level that causes stress to aquatic organisms. • Excess nutrients and bacteria attach to fine sediments that settle on the bottom of the channels. • The excess sedimentation is due to poor circulation. • The poor circulation is caused by the pinch points of fill that support the pedestrian bridges, and by the unnatural alignment of the channels, perpendicular to the main lagoon channel. The only way to correct the poor circulation is to remove old fill and reconfigure the channels to a more natural pattern. • The three channels will be reconfigured into a single branched channel that angles towards the ocean. • A single branched channel will cause the water to move faster and will help prevent excess sedimentation. This is similar to the Venturi effect, where the velocity of a fluid increases as the cross section of the tube carrying it decreases. The work will occur only in the western channels and the Adamson boat house channel, not in the main body of the lagoon. • The sand berm beach will not be changed. • The surf break will not be impacted. • The location of the breach and the timing of breaches will not change.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed
    JULY 2009 19. Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this paper. The authors would also like to thank Eric Stein, Drew Ackerman, Ken Hoffman, Wing Tam, and Betty Dong for their timely advice and encouragement. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 100 N. Old San Gabriel Canyon Road Azusa, CA 91702. Preferred Citation: Sheng, J., and Wilson, J.P., 2009. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California: 18, Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling for the Santa Monica Bay Watershed. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California. Our goals are to protect and restore natural areas, restore natural hydrological function, promote equitable access to open space, and maximize support via multiple-use facilities. The Plan is a joint venture between the University of Southern California and the San Gabriel and lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, Coastal Conservancy, and Baldwin Hills Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project
    Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Year 3 Annual Report September 2019 Prepared for: City of Santa Monica California Coastal Commission US Environmental Protection Agency California Department of Parks and Recreation The Bay Foundation 8334 Lincoln Blvd. #310 (888) 301-2527 www.santamonicabay.org Year 3 Annual Report, September 2019 Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project Year 3 Annual Report September 2019 Prepared by: The Bay Foundation Prepared for: City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Parks and Recreation Authors: Karina Johnston, Melodie Grubbs, and Chris Enyart, The Bay Foundation Scientific Contributors: David Hubbard, University of California Santa Barbara Dr. Jenifer Dugan, University of California Santa Barbara Dan Cooper, Cooper Ecological Monitoring, Inc. Dr. Karen Martin, Pepperdine University Dr. Sean Anderson, California State University Channel Islands Dr. Guangyu Wang, Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission Evyan Sloane, California State Coastal Conservancy Suggested Citation: Johnston, K., M. Grubbs, and C. Enyart. 2019. Santa Monica Beach Restoration Pilot Project: Year 3 Annual Report. Report prepared by The Bay Foundation for City of Santa Monica, California Coastal Commission, US Environmental Protection Agency, and California Department of Parks and Recreation. 88 pages. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Metabolic Studio (Annenberg Foundation; Grant 15-541) for funding the implementation of this pilot project, and our partners: City of Santa Monica and California Department of Parks and Recreation. Their support has allowed us to explore soft-scape protection measures to increase coastal resilience, while bringing back an important coastal habitat to the Los Angeles region.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Steelhead Populations Are in Danger of Extinction Within the Next 25-50 Years, Due to Anthropogenic and Environmental Impacts That Threaten Recovery
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus Critical Concern. Status Score = 1.9 out of 5.0. Southern steelhead populations are in danger of extinction within the next 25-50 years, due to anthropogenic and environmental impacts that threaten recovery. Since its listing as an Endangered Species in 1997, southern steelhead abundance remains precariously low. Description: Southern steelhead are similar to other steelhead and are distinguished primarily by genetic and physiological differences that reflect their evolutionary history. They also exhibit morphometric differences that distinguish them from other coastal steelhead in California such as longer, more streamlined bodies that facilitate passage more easily in Southern California’s characteristic low flow, flashy streams (Bajjaliya et al. 2014). Taxonomic Relationships: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) historically populated all coastal streams of Southern California with permanent flows, as either resident or anadromous trout, or both. Due to natural events such as fire and debris flows, and more recently due to anthropogenic forces such as urbanization and dam construction, many rainbow trout populations are isolated in remote headwaters of their native basins and exhibit a resident life history. In streams with access to the ocean, anadromous forms are present, which have a complex relationship with the resident forms (see Life History section). Southern California steelhead, or southern steelhead, is our informal name for the anadromous form of the formally designated Southern California Coast Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (DPS). Southern steelhead occurring below man-made or natural barriers were distinguished from resident trout in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing, and are under different jurisdictions for purposes of fisheries management although the two forms typically constitute one interbreeding population.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.7 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.7 – HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 3.7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes the existing setting of the project site and vicinity, identifies associated regulatory requirements, and evaluates potential impacts related to construction and operation of the proposed project. Documents reviewed and incorporated as part of this analysis include the Civil Engineering Initial Study Data (KPFF Consulting Engineers, August 2016, Appendix G), the Sewer Capacity Study (KPFF Consulting Engineers, June 2016, Appendix G), the Geotechnical Engineering Investigation – Proposed Robertson Lane Hotel and Retail Structures, and Subterranean Parking Structure Extension below West Hollywood Park (Geotechnologies Inc, Appendix E). 3.7.1 Environmental Setting Surface Hydrology The City of West Hollywood discharges stormwater via regional underground storm drains into the upper reach of Ballona Creek, a subwatershed of Santa Monica Bay. The Ballona Creek Watershed is approximately 128 square miles in size and is bounded by the Santa Monica Mountains to the north and the Baldwin Hills to the south. The Santa Monica Bay monitoring site for West Hollywood and the other Ballona Creek cities discharging into Santa Monica Bay is at Dockweiler Beach, a site located over 10 miles downstream from the City of West Hollywood. Of the Ballona Creek watershed tributary to this site, 81% is under the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles. The other 19% of the watershed area is within the jurisdiction of the cities of Beverly Hills, Culver City, Inglewood, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood; the County of Los Angeles; and Caltrans (City of West Hollywood 2010). Existing stormwater runoff from the project site is conveyed via sheet flow and curb drains to the adjacent streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan
    Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan April 2005 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee Ann Dalkey and Travis Longcore, Co-Chairs Editor’s Note This document includes text prepared by several authors. Julie Stephenson and Dr. Antony Orme completed research and text on geomorphology (Appendix A). Dr. Ronald Davidson researched and reported South Bay history (Appendix B). Sarah Casia and Leann Ortmann completed biological fieldwork, supervised by Dr. Rudi Mattoni. All photographs © Travis Longcore. GreenInfo Network prepared maps under the direction of Aubrey Dugger (http://www.greeninfo.org). You may download a copy of this plan from: http://www.urbanwildlands.org/bbrp.html This plan was prepared with funding from California Proposition 12, administered by the California Coastal Conservancy and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Commission through a grant to the Los Angeles Conservation Corps and The Urban Wildlands Group. Significant additional funding was provided by a grant from the City of Redondo Beach. Preferred Citation Longcore, T. (ed.). 2005. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Master Plan. Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Steering Committee, Redondo Beach, California. 2 Beach Bluffs Restoration Project Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction .........................................................................................................................5 Goals.....................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Bibliography
    Issue Bibliography Abbott, C.C. Anderson, Eugene N., Jr. 1879 Artifact Descriptions. In, Report Upon 1964 A Bibliography of the Chumash and Their United States Geographical Surveys West of Predecessors. University of California the One Hundredth Meridian. 7(1):49-116, Archaeological Survey Annual Reports 61: 122-239 (Mortars and pestles are discussed 25-74. Berkeley. on pp. 70-92). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. Armstrong, Douglas V. 1985 Archaeology on San Clemente Island, Allen, Larry G. Summer 1985. Ms. on file, Natural Resources 1985 A Habitat Analysis of Nearshore Marine Office, Naval Air Station North Island, San Fisheries from Southern California. Bulletin Diego. of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 84(3):134-155. Los Angeles. Axford, L. Michael 1975 Archaeological Research on San Clemente Alliot, Hector Island, California (Research proposal 1915 Burial Methods of the Southern California submitted to Naval Undersea Center, San Islanders. Bulletin of the Southern California Diego, California). Ms. on file, Natural Academy of Sciences 14(2). Los Angeles. Resources Office, Naval Air Station North (Reprinted in Masterkey 43(4): 125-131. Island, San Diego. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles, 1969) 1976 Archaeological Research on San Clemente 1917 Prehistoric use of bitumen in Southern Island, Progress Report. Ms. on file, Natural California. Bulletin of the Southern Califor- Resources Office, Naval Air Station North nia Academy of Sciences 16(2). Los Angeles. Island, San Diego. 1969 (see 1915) 1977 Archaeological Research on San Clemente Island, Progress Report. Ms. on file, Natural Ames, Jack A. Resources Office, Naval Air Station North 1972 California Sheephead. Ms. On file, California Island, San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Entrance Parks to the Ballona Creek Bikepath
    Newsletter Issue Number 28 April 2010 Ballona Creek Renaissance... dedicated to renewing Ballona THREE NEW ENTRANCE PARKS Creek and its watershed for a TO THE BALLONA CREEK BIKEPATH healthier, more sustainable environment and community. Building on the success of a 2005 project, at- (We are also known as BCR) tractive new gates and entrance parks were www.ballonacreek.org installed in September at three locations along the Ballona Creek bikepath: McConnell Ave- Mail us at: nue, Inglewood Blvd and Sepulveda Blvd. Ballona Creek Renaissance The Mountains Recreation and Conservation PO Box 843 Authority (MRCA), a state agency, created the Culver City, CA 90232 projects to enhance the experience of cyclists, walkers and joggers along the bikepath by Or Contact us: replacing the chain link fencing and asphalt Jim Lamm, President with natural-looking areas and rest stops. 310-839-6896 [email protected] The three areas were designed in the same Officers and Directors style as the entrance park at Centinela Ave- Jim Lamm, President nue (see our June 2005 newsletter, available Scott Malsin, Vice President on our website). Each has a metal gate with Bobbi Gold, Secretary/Treasurer design elements suggesting the creek, ocean Lucy Blake-Elahi waves, birds and bikepath. Inside the gates Cathi Lamm are appropriate native plants, low rock walls, Irene Reingold Amy Rosenstein benches and drinking fountains. (The McCon- Gerald Sallus nell entrance does not have a fountain but is Sandrine Cassidy Schmitt only half a mile from the Centinela entrance, Mim Shapiro which does.) June Walden Artist Lucy Blake-Elahi, pictured above, who is also a founding member of BCR, Advisory Council designed the Sepulveda Blvd gate, shown below.
    [Show full text]