September 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Characterization of Moose Movement Patterns and Movement of Black Bears in Relation to Anthropogenic Food Sources on Joint Basse
Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 074-0188 AD_________________ (Leave blank) Award Number(s): W81XWH-08-2-0179-0002 W912DY-09-2-0011 W9126G-10-2-0042 TITLE: Characterization of moose movement patterns and movement of black bears in relation to anthropogenic food sources on Joint Base Elmendorf- Richardson, Alaska PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: (Enter the name and degree of Principal Investigator and any Associates) Sean D. Farley,Ph.D.; Perry Barboza, Ph.D ; Herman Griese, MS; Christopher Garner, BS CONTRACTING ORGANIZATION: 673d Civil Engineering Squadron 724 Quartermaster Drive Joint Base Elmendorf Richardson, Alaska 99505-8860 REPORT DATE: Sept 2014 TYPE OF REPORT: Final PREPARED FOR: U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702-5012 (W81XWH-08-2-0179-0002) Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822 (W912DY-09-2-0011) Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300 (W9126G-10-2-0042) DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT: (Check one) X Approved for public release; distribution unlimited Distribution limited to U.S. Government agencies only; report contains proprietary information The views, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision unless so designated by other documentation. 1 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. -
Alaska's Predator Control Programs
Alaska’sAlaska’s PredatorPredator ControlControl ProgramsPrograms Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? In 1995, Alaska Governor Tony Knowles responded to negative publicity over his state’s predator control programs by requesting a National Academy of Sciences review of Alaska’s entire approach to predator control. Following the review Governor Knowles announced that no program should be considered unless it met three criteria: cost-effectiveness, scientific scrutiny and broad public acceptability. The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) released its review, Wolves, Bears, and Their Prey in Alaska, in 1997, drawing conclusions and making recommendations for management of Alaska’s predators and prey. In 1996, prior to the release of the NRC report, the Wolf Management Reform Coalition, a group dedicated to promoting fair-chase hunting and responsible management of wolves in Alaska, published Showdown in Alaska to document the rise of wolf control in Alaska and the efforts undertaken to stop it. This report, Alaska’s Predator Control Programs: Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? picks up where that 1996 report left off. Acknowledgements Authors: Caroline Kennedy, Theresa Fiorino Editor: Kate Davies Designer: Pete Corcoran DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. www.defenders.org Cover photo: © Nick Jans © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 302 Anchorage, AK 99501 907.276.9453 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 2. The National Research Council Review ...................................................................... -
Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis Lupus) from the List of Endangered
References Cited for the Proposed Rule “Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Maintaining Protections for the Mexican Wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) by Listing It as Endangered” Adams, L.G., R.O. Stephenson, B.W. Dale, R.T. Ahgook, and D. J. Demma. 2008. Population dynamics and harvest characteristics of wolves in the central Brooks Range, Alaska. Wildlife Monographs 170: 1-25. Adaptive Management Oversight Committee and Interagency Field Team [AMOC and IFT]. 2005. Mexican wolf Blue Range reintroduction project 5-year review. Unpublished report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 2, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/mexicanwolf/MWNR_FYRD.shtml Anschutz, Steve. 2003. E-mail from Anschutz, USFWS Nebraska Field Office Supervisor to Laura Ragan, USFWS Regional Office, Ft. Snelling, MN, dated 04/01/03. Subject: gray wolf shot. 1 p. Anschutz, Steve. 2006. E-mail from Anschutz, USFWS Nebraska Field Office Supervisor to Ron Refsnider, USFWS Regional Office, Ft. Snelling, MN, dated 10/30/06. Subject: Nebraska wolf from 1995? Arizona Department of Health Services. 2012. Rabies Statistics and Maps, 2008-2012. www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/vector/rabies/stats.htm. Accessed on July 23, 2012. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2007. Predator management in Alaska. Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Wildlife Conservation. 32pp. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 2011. 2011-2012 Alaska trapping regulations. Alaska Department of Fish and Game. 48pp. Allendorf, F.W. and N. Ryman. 2002. The role of genetics in population viability analysis. Pages 50-85 in Beissinger, S.R., and D.R. -
Superperformance: New Profound Knowledge for Corporate Leaders
SUPER PERFORMANCE New Profound Knowledge for Corporate Leaders 1 Simple Formula 8 Simple Rules 1 Billion Great Results Dave Guerra Copyright © 2005 Dave Guerra All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America This book may not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in whole or in part, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Dave Guerra. Cover Design by Axiom Design Group, Houston, Texas. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 2005906413 Guerra, Dave Superperformance: New Profound Knowledge for Corporate Leaders ISBN 1-58961-396-1 This book is Dedicated to my mother Virginia Sanchez Guerra Whose Indomitable Spirit and Fiery Passion Lives on in these Pages Contents Preface . vii Acknowledgements . .x The Formula, The Evidence, and the Science of Superperformance 1 How Superperformance Happens . .3 What is Organizational Superperformance? . 3 The Superperformance Formula . 5 Polar-Complementarity . 12 Summary . 17 The Business End of Superperformance. .19 The Superperformers . 19 Economic Superforce . 21 Any Organization Can Become a Superperformer . 22 Berkshire Hathaway: Capital Investing . 23 Harley-Davidson: Motorcycles . 27 Johnson & Johnson: Healthcare Products. 30 Microsoft: Software . 33 Southwest Airlines: Airlines. 36 Sterling Bancshares: Regional Banking . 39 v Superperformance Contents SYSCO: Food Distribution . 41 Tiffany & Company: Jewelry . 43 Toyota: Automobiles . 46 Wal-Mart: Retailing . 48 Summary . 51 From Machine to Organism . .54 Adopting a New Worldview. 54 Machine View . 55 Organism View . 58 Summary . 62 The Properties of Superperformance 63 Leading and Managing Superperformance. .65 Meet the Invisibles . 65 Leaders and Managers are the Same People . -
Moose Survey Report 2013
AERIAL MOOSE SURVEY on and around KANUTI NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE November, 2013 Tim Craig US Fish and Wildlife Service and Glenn W. Stout Alaska Department of Fish and Game February 2014 DATA SUMMARY Survey Dates: 12- 18 November (Intensive survey only) Total area covered by survey: Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge (hereafter, Refuge) Survey Area: 2,715 mi2 (7,029 km2); Total Survey Area: 3,736 mi2 (9676 km2) Total Number sample units Refuge Survey Area: 508; Total Survey Area: 701 Number of sample units surveyed: Refuge Survey Area: 105; Total Survey Area: 129 Total moose observed: Refuge Survey Area: 259 moose (130 cows, 95 bulls, and 34 calves); Total Survey Area: 289 moose (145 cows, 105 bulls, 39 calves) November population estimate: Refuge Survey Area: 551 moose (90% confidence interval = 410 - 693) comprised of 283 cows, 183 bulls, and 108 calves*; Total Survey Area: 768 moose (90% confidence interval = 589 – 947) comprised of 387 cows, 257 bulls, 144 calves*. *Subtotals by class do not equal the total population because of accumulated error associated with each estimate. Estimated total density: Refuge Survey Area: 0.20 moose/mi2 (0.08 moose/km2); Total Survey Area: 0.21 moose/mi2 (0.08 moose/km2) Estimated ratios: Refuge survey area: 36 calves:100 cows, 11 yearling bulls:100 cows, 37 large bulls:100 cows, 65 total bulls:100 cows; Total Survey Area: 35 calves:100 cows, 11 yearling bulls:100 cows, 40 large bulls:100 cows, 67 total bulls:100 cows 2 INTRODUCTION The Kanuti National Wildlife Refuge (hereafter, Refuge), the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) and the Bureau of Land Management cooperatively conducted a moose (Alces alces) population survey 12 - 18 November 2013 on, and around, the Refuge. -
Jack Anderson Posing with His Ultra-Rare 1957 Series 1 T'bird
Jack Anderson posing with his ultra-rare 1957 Series 1 T’Bird Supercharged F Code One of only 15 built and the only one of the remaining 8 to be in original and unrestored condition Jack is the owner of Laura Buick/GMC in Collinsville. Every year, he invites our club to a car show at his dealership. This year, unfortunately, weather caused the cancellation of the event. Jack then invited our club to join his Thunderbird club for an afternoon at his farm and fishing lake. Representing our club were 11 members along with spouses and guests. We were treated to a catered luncheon under a very large tent. Many cars of varying variety were brought to the event. There were Thunderbirds, a Pantera, a Superformance Cobra, Fords and our beloved Buicks on display. Jack had also invited the Cadillac club and some Mopar cars, but they were unable to make it there. Show Field with all of the Buicks Mark and Sherree, Mike and Sandy Chet, Pete, Rich and Patrick Dave, Bob and Barb, Mary and Jeanne (Notice that Dave is entertaining the ladies) A special Gateway Buick Club thank you goes out to Jack and Laura Anderson for hosting a marvelous afternoon of food, fellowship and cars!! They could not have been more accommodating and gracious in welcoming us to their event. Jack indicated that this might become an annual event. If that is so, you all need to block out your calendar and plan to attend. Details to come later, but this year was the second Sunday of June, which is probably a good guess as to the date for next year. -
Buick Club of America Volume XXXVI No
1968 Buick Electra 225 owned by Steve Dodson Monthly Newsletter of the St Louis Chapter Buick Club of America Volume XXXVI No. 7 July 2017 Hi All … I hope everyone is having a great summer so far. I am always frank and honest…and this month’s director’s letter is an urgent call for our club to step up and help. Guys and gals… we are in desperate need to sell our trophy classes for the Shriners Benefit Car Show. We are less than 3 months away and have sold only 15 of our 32 classes. Richard Self has volunteered to revisit last GATEWAY GAZETTE 1 year’s contacts made by Doug Stahl, and Mark Kistner is following up on some leads. If we cannot sell these classes, we will not be able to pay for trophies this year. We really need everyone to step up to make this come together. Doug Stahl went to businesses that he frequented regularly… is there a business you visit that may want to contribute? Are your co-workers generous? Maybe have people poll $5.00 each together to sponsor a class. If everyone just asks a few businesses… we will be able to make this come together in time for the show. I have sold three classes and have been busy working on attendance prizes and raffle baskets. On my annual car trip I received verbal confirmation from Mothers and Laid Back for items again this year. I will also be visiting FastLane Cars and EPC Computers next week. September will be here before we know it. -
2 • Presented by La Jolla Historical Society April 12-14, 2019
2 • Presented by La Jolla Historical Society April 12-14, 2019 • 3 3 • Presented by La Jolla Historical Society April 12-14, 2019 • 4 SDTMD 2017 REPORT TOURISM ECONOMIC IMPACT San Diego Tourism Marketing District $10.4 BILLION 35 MILLION LA JOLLA DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Know Your Audience TOTAL VISITOR SPENDING TOTAL VISITORS INCOME TRAVEL BUSINESS & VACATION TRAVEL SPENDING Transport 73.83% - Personal Vehicle Number of Vehicles Per Household Average Household is over $205k 30% travel +21 days/yr on business Of Households over $205k per year, Average net worth exceeds $2 million 2 Vehicles 3 Vehicles 45% net worth of $1-$4 million 60% have income of $100k to $500k 60% 10% 45% 15% 45% travel +21 days/yr for pleasure 41.29% 13.99% 10% have income in excess of $500k/yr 15% net worth of $4-$10 million+ 73.83% 45% purchase +21 days/yr of hotel accommodations 5 • Presented by La Jolla Historical Society April 12-14, 2019 • 6 7 • Presented by La Jolla Historical Society April 12-14, 2019 • 8 AboutLA JOLLA CONCOURSUs D’ELEGANCE BIOGRAPHIES G. MICHAEL DORVILLIER NIGEL MATTHEWS CHAIRMAN, LA JOLLA CONCOURS D’ELEGANCE CHIEF JUDGE The La Jolla Historical Society welcomes back Michael Dorvillier as chair of the 2019 La Jolla Concours d’Elegance, Originally from Oxfordshire, England. Nigel has enjoyed the past 42 years living in Vancouver, British Columbia one of the Society’s major fundraising events. A Registered Principal and Financial Advisor with Symbio Financial where he worked as a red seal designation licensed automotive technician and member of the Guild of Master Partners and LPL Financial, Michael is a passionate antique car collector who is committed to the ongoing success Craftsmen, repairing and restoring Rolls-Royce and Ferrari automobiles. -
Technical Note Usda Natural Resources Conservation Service Alaska
TECHNICAL NOTE USDA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE ALASKA Alaska Biology Technical Note – No. 1 HABITAT ENHANCEMENT for MOOSE in BOREAL ALASKA Introduction Moose evolved in Eurasia and migrated to North America over the Bering Land Bridge during the Pleistocene. Moose have been an important part of Alaska Native subsistence culture for millennia. In addition to being one of the most familiar large mammals in the state, they are also one of the most sought-after wildlife species in Alaska. Harvest is over 7,000 animals per year which yields millions of pounds of meat for human consumption. Wildlife management seeks to manage wildlife populations at an optimum abundance and provide sustainable harvest, maintain a desired nutritional or health condition of wildlife species and their forage plants, and provide for non- consumptive uses, such as wildlife viewing. Abundance of moose is constrained by hunting, predation, other sources of natural mortality (e.g., winter severity) as Moose. Photo courtesy of US Fish & Wildlife Service. well as the quantity and quality of available habitat. In the boreal forest, productive moose habitat is largely maintained by stochastic wildland fire in uplands and more regular fluvial action constrained to riparian corridors. During most years in Alaska, over one million acres of forest is burned. Many of these fires create optimal moose habitat for 20 – 30 years until preferred forage species like aspen, birch, and poplar grow out of the reach of moose or are replaced by non-forage species, typically spruce. Intensive foraging by high density moose populations can accelerate successional change from preferred forage species to non-preferred species. -
Environmental and Safety Solutions Industry Update August 2013
Environmental and Safety Solutions Industry Update │ August 2013 Harris Williams & Co. Environmental and Safety Solutions │August 2013 MONTHLY SPOTLIGHT CONTENTS MONTHLY SPOTLIGHT Four Important Trends for Global Air Quality and Pollution Solutions WHAT WE’RE READING Despite several decades of tightening air quality and pollution regulations in many RELEVANT HW&CO. TRANSACTIONS PUBLIC MARKETS developed countries, there remains a major global focus on the subject with a variety of PUBLIC COMPARABLES implications for governments, businesses, investors, and individuals. Although daily, NOTABLE M&A ACTIVITY weekly, and monthly reports out of China dominate the headlines with respect to air M&A TRANSACTION DETAIL pollution issues, there are a variety of important global considerations that will either directly support or supplement investor returns across certain of our focus sectors, OUR PRACTICE including engineering, construction, and consulting as well as test, measurement, and control. This month, we present several considerations for various market participants Harris Williams & Co. is a leading advisor regarding global air quality and pollution developments. to the environmental and safety solutions M&A market. Our Environmental and 1 Climate Change Will Dominate Shifts in Global Air Emissions Standards Safety Solutions Practice includes experience across a broad range of sectors, Efforts to significantly reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly carbon including products and services that meet dioxide, are inevitable and will have a considerable impact on virtually every area of environmental and safety demands for a economic activity in coming decades, with dramatic effects for particular industries and variety of end markets. sectors. The open question on the topic pertains mostly to how quickly major policies around the world will develop to affect meaningful and permanent reductions in GHG E&S Sectors emissions (not “if” such policies will eventually occur). -
A Special Program for Secondary Schools in Bristol Bay
DOCUMNNT RNSUPIR RC 003 626 ED 032 173 By-Holthaus, Cary H. Bristol Bay. Teaching Eskimo Culture to Eskimo Students:A Special Program for Secondary Schools in Pub Date May 68 Note -215p. EDRS Price MF -$1.00 HC Not Availablefrom EDRS. *Eskimos.HistoryInstruction, Descriptors -*Biculturalism,CultureConflict.*Curriculum Development. Instructional Materials, LanguageInstruction, *Resource Materials.Rural Areas, Secondary Education, *Social Studies Identifiers-Alaska, Aleuts, Bristol Bay Eskimo youth in Bristol Bay,Alaska. caught between the clashof native and white cultures, have difficultyidentifying with either culture.The curriculum in Indian schools in the area. gearedprimarily to white middle-classstandards. is not relevant to the students. Textbooks andstandardized tests, based onexperiences common to a white culture, hold little meaningfor Eskimo students.Teachers unfamiliar with Eskimo traditions and culture areunable to understand orcommunicate with the native people. Since the existingcurriculum in Bristol Bayschools ignores thestudents' cultural background. theauthor considers the creationof a unified multi-semester social studies curriculumabout the native heritage as amethod of dealing with students' problems. This paper. as afirst step in creating such acurriculum, can and is directed serve as a sourcematerial for informationabout the Bristol Bay area. toward the developmentof a one semester secondarylevel course in native history of the paper consists ofmaterial about the history. and culture. A major portion folklore of geography. -
Conservation Strategies for Species Affected by Apparent Competition
Conservation Practice and Policy Conservation Strategies for Species Affected by Apparent Competition HEIKO U. WITTMER,∗ ROBERT SERROUYA,† L. MARK ELBROCH,‡ AND ANDREW J. MARSHALL§ ∗School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand email [email protected] †Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada ‡Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. §Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A. Abstract: Apparent competition is an indirect interaction between 2 or more prey species through a shared predator, and it is increasingly recognized as a mechanism of the decline and extinction of many species. Through case studies, we evaluated the effectiveness of 4 management strategies for species affected by apparent competition: predator control, reduction in the abundances of alternate prey, simultaneous control of predators and alternate prey, and no active management of predators or alternate prey. Solely reducing predator abundances rapidly increased abundances of alternate and rare prey, but observed increases are likely short-lived due to fast increases in predator abundance following the cessation of control efforts. Sub- stantial reductions of an abundant alternate prey resulted in increased predation on endangered huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) deer in Chilean Patagonia, which highlights potential risks associated with solely reducing alternate prey species. Simultaneous removal of predators and alternate prey increased survival of island foxes (Urocyon littoralis) in California (U.S.A.) above a threshold required for population recovery. In the absence of active management, populations of rare woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) continued to decline in British Columbia, Canada.