תוארי כבוד Honorary Degrees Conferment Ceremony
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Masterscriptie Staats- En Bestuursrecht
Masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht Het vrije mandaat: feit of fictie? Beperkingen aan fractieafsplitsingen getoetst aan het vrije mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden Auteur A. (Arie) Vonk Noordegraaf LL.B. Studentnummer 3675386 Begeleider prof. mr. R. Nehmelman Datum 22 maart 2017 Sol Iustitiae Illustra Nos - Zon der Gerechtigheid, verlicht ons 2 Voorwoord Maartensdijk, 22 maart 2017 Met het afronden van mijn masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht komt er einde aan mijn studietijd aan de Universiteit Utrecht. Ik heb de afgelopen jaren enorm veel geleerd en ook genoten van de vele juridische vraagstukken die besproken werden. Na het afronden van de bachelor Rechtsgeleerdheid met een scriptie over de vrijheid van onderwijs was de master Staats- en Bestuursrecht een voor de hand liggende keuze. De master sloot goed aan op mijn (politieke) interesses. Hoewel ik zowel het staatsrecht als het bestuursrecht bestudeerde, ligt mijn hart toch echt bij het staatsrecht. Deze scriptie is daar een bewijs van. Het is mooi om juist in dit voorjaar mijn masterscriptie af te ronden. Het jaar 2017 is in het licht van het onderwerp van deze masterscriptie namelijk een bijzonder jaar. Het is dit jaar precies honderd jaar geleden dat in 1917 het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging werd ingevoerd. Het jaar 1917 is een keerpunt in de parlementaire geschiedenis van Nederland. Enerzijds is dit het begin van de hedendaagse parlementaire democratie. Anderzijds is de invoering van het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging ook een bedreiging voor het vrije en persoonlijke mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden. De partijmacht wordt groter terwijl individuele Tweede Kamerleden ook in 2017 worden geacht zonder last te stemmen. -
Israel Prize
Year Winner Discipline 1953 Gedaliah Alon Jewish studies 1953 Haim Hazaz literature 1953 Ya'akov Cohen literature 1953 Dina Feitelson-Schur education 1953 Mark Dvorzhetski social science 1953 Lipman Heilprin medical science 1953 Zeev Ben-Zvi sculpture 1953 Shimshon Amitsur exact sciences 1953 Jacob Levitzki exact sciences 1954 Moshe Zvi Segal Jewish studies 1954 Schmuel Hugo Bergmann humanities 1954 David Shimoni literature 1954 Shmuel Yosef Agnon literature 1954 Arthur Biram education 1954 Gad Tedeschi jurisprudence 1954 Franz Ollendorff exact sciences 1954 Michael Zohary life sciences 1954 Shimon Fritz Bodenheimer agriculture 1955 Ödön Pártos music 1955 Ephraim Urbach Jewish studies 1955 Isaac Heinemann Jewish studies 1955 Zalman Shneur literature 1955 Yitzhak Lamdan literature 1955 Michael Fekete exact sciences 1955 Israel Reichart life sciences 1955 Yaakov Ben-Tor life sciences 1955 Akiva Vroman life sciences 1955 Benjamin Shapira medical science 1955 Sara Hestrin-Lerner medical science 1955 Netanel Hochberg agriculture 1956 Zahara Schatz painting and sculpture 1956 Naftali Herz Tur-Sinai Jewish studies 1956 Yigael Yadin Jewish studies 1956 Yehezkel Abramsky Rabbinical literature 1956 Gershon Shufman literature 1956 Miriam Yalan-Shteklis children's literature 1956 Nechama Leibowitz education 1956 Yaakov Talmon social sciences 1956 Avraham HaLevi Frankel exact sciences 1956 Manfred Aschner life sciences 1956 Haim Ernst Wertheimer medicine 1957 Hanna Rovina theatre 1957 Haim Shirman Jewish studies 1957 Yohanan Levi humanities 1957 Yaakov -
Jewish Philosophy Department of Hebrew Culture Studies Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities Tel Aviv University
Jewish Philosophy Department of Hebrew Culture Studies Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities Tel Aviv University Report of the External Evaluation Team for The Council of Higher Education August 2010 The following document is the Evaluation Committee's report on the Jewish Philosophy Track at Tel Aviv University to the Quality Assessment Unit of the Council for Higher Education (CHE). General Background In response to the invitation of the Minister of Education and the Council of Higher Education a Committee of four members was created in early 2009 to review the undergraduate and graduate programs in Jewish thought in four Israeli universities, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv University, and Bar Ilan University. The Committee is comprised of: Professor David Novak, University of Toronto; Professor Alfred Ivry, New York University (Emeritus); Professor Moshe Idel, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; and Professor Steven T. Katz, Boston University. Professor Katz also serves as the Chair of the Committee. Ms. Michal Kabatznik coordinated the committee on behalf of the CHE. The Committee's letter of appointment is attached as Appendix 1. The first round of meetings was held in May, 2009. It involved discussions in Jerusalem and 2 day on-site visits to Ben Gurion University and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. The second round of Committee meetings was held in December, 2009. It involved discussions in Tel Aviv and on-site two day visits to Tel Aviv University and Bar Ilan University. In the present report the Visiting Committee will provide its views on, and recommendations concerning, Tel Aviv University. -
Gazeta Spring 2016
Volume 23, No. 2 Gazeta Spring 2016 A quarterly publication of the American Association for Polish-Jewish Studies and Taube Foundation for Jewish Life & Culture Editorial & Design: Fay Bussgang, Julian Bussgang, Dr. Antony Polonsky, Shana Penn, Vera Hannush, Alice Lawrence, Maayan Stanton, LaserCom Design. Front Cover: “Clover Leaf Map,” a stylized illustration with Jerusalem at the center, adopted by the Jewish Culture Festival to convey its 2016 theme of “diaspora.” Illustration: Heinrich Bünting, Itinerarium Sacrae Scripturae (Travel through Holy Scripture), 1581. Back Cover: Ride For The Living, 2015, hosted by the JCC Kraków. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message from Irene Pipes ............................................................................................... 2 Message from Tad Taube and Shana Penn ................................................................... 3 FEATURE STORY The Great Yes and My Grandmother’s Legacy By Prof. dr hab. Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz ................................................................ 4 SCHOLARSHIP University of Wrocław’s Department of Jewish Studies Receives Capital Grant ........ 9 POLIN Museum and Jewish Historical Institute Announce Recipients of Global Education Outreach Program (GEOP) Research Fellowships ........................ 10 NEW PUBLICATIONS Polin: Studies in Polish Jewry, Volume 29: “Writing East European Jewish History” By Dr. Antony Polonsky ..................................................................................................... 12 Poland and Polin: New Interpretations -
President's Report 2018
VISION COUNTING UP TO 50 President's Report 2018 Chairman’s Message 4 President’s Message 5 Senior Administration 6 BGU by the Numbers 8 Building BGU 14 Innovation for the Startup Nation 16 New & Noteworthy 20 From BGU to the World 40 President's Report Alumni Community 42 2018 Campus Life 46 Community Outreach 52 Recognizing Our Friends 57 Honorary Degrees 88 Board of Governors 93 Associates Organizations 96 BGU Nation Celebrate BGU’s role in the Israeli miracle Nurturing the Negev 12 Forging the Hi-Tech Nation 18 A Passion for Research 24 Harnessing the Desert 30 Defending the Nation 36 The Beer-Sheva Spirit 44 Cultivating Israeli Society 50 Produced by the Department of Publications and Media Relations Osnat Eitan, Director In coordination with the Department of Donor and Associates Affairs Jill Ben-Dor, Director Editor Elana Chipman Editorial Staff Ehud Zion Waldoks, Jacqueline Watson-Alloun, Angie Zamir Production Noa Fisherman Photos Dani Machlis Concept and Design www.Image2u.co.il 4 President's Report 2018 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev - BGU Nation 5 From the From the Chairman President Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben–Gurion, said:“Only Apartments Program, it is worth noting that there are 73 This year we are celebrating Israel’s 70th anniversary and Program has been studied and reproduced around through a united effort by the State … by a people ready “Open Apartments” in Beer-Sheva’s neighborhoods, where acknowledging our contributions to the State of Israel, the the world and our students are an inspiration to their for a great voluntary effort, by a youth bold in spirit and students live and actively engage with the local community Negev, and the world, even as we count up to our own neighbors, encouraging them and helping them strive for a inspired by creative heroism, by scientists liberated from the through various cultural and educational activities. -
Tel Aviv University Evaluation Report
The Committee for the Evaluation of Nursing Study-Programs Tel Aviv University Evaluation Report November 2010 1 Contents Chapter 1: Background…………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 2: Committee Procedures………...……………………………………….4 Chapter 3: Evaluation of the Department of Nursing at Tel Aviv University………………..……….……………………………………....5 Appendices: Appendix 1 – Letter of Appointment Appendix 2 - Schedule of the visit 2 Chapter 1 - Background At its meeting on October 7, 2008 the Council for Higher Education (CHE) decided to evaluate study programs in the field of Nursing. Following the decision of the CHE, the Minister of Education who serves ex officio as a Chairperson of the CHE, appointed a committee consisting of: • Prof. Erika Froelicher- School of Nursing and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, USA- Committee Chair • Prof. Joyce Fitzpatrick- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, USA1 • Prof. Miriam Hirschfeld- Department of Nursing, Jezreel Valley College, Israel • Prof. Barbara Kelley- College of Nursing, Northeastern University, USA • Prof. Jane Robinson- University of Nottingham, United Kingdom Ms. Alisa Elon, Coordinator of the committee on behalf of the CHE Within the framework of its activity, the Committee was requested to2: 1. Examine the self-evaluation reports submitted by institutions that provide study programs in Nursing, and to conduct on-site visits at those institutions. 2. Submit to the CHE an individual report on each of the evaluated departments, including the Committee's findings and recommendations. 3. Submit to the CHE a general report on the state of the discipline in the Israeli system of higher education, including recommendations for standards in the evaluated field of study. -
June 17, 1993 Interview with André Finkelstein by Avner Cohen
Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified June 17, 1993 Interview with André Finkelstein by Avner Cohen Citation: “Interview with André Finkelstein by Avner Cohen,” June 17, 1993, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, From the personal collection of Avner Cohen. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/113997 Summary: Transcript of Avner Cohen's 1993 interview with André Finkelstein. Finkelstein, deputy director of the IAEA and a ranking official within the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), discusses Franco- Israeli nuclear technology exchange and collaboration in this 1993 interview. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation and Carnegie Corporation of New York (CCNY). Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Interview with Dr. André Finkelstein [1] This interview was conducted on 17 June 1993 in Paris, France. Interviewer: Dr. Avner Cohen Dr. André Finkelstein: I was trained as a physical chemist, I spent two years in Rochester University in New York and then I came back and joined the French Commission.[2],[3] Dr. Avner Cohen: When was that? Finkelstein: ’53. And I was involved in isotope tritium production and then quickly the Commission was expanding very quickly, so many people had no chance to stay in the lab very long and I was called to headquarters and I was in international affairs. I float[ed] for many years in [International Atomic Energy Agency] IAEA[4] in Vienna and I was for four years as deputy director general in Vienna and then I came back . Cohen: For Hans Blix?[5] Finkelstein: Before Hans Blix, with [Sigvard] Eklund [6] in the Department of Research and Isotopes. -
Israeli Nuclear Deterrence: The
Israeli Nuclear Deterrence: The Failure of a Concept "How did the Change in Israel's Strategic Context Affect the Usefulness of the Israeli Nuclear Deterrent?" By Amr Nasr El-Din ID # 900020584 Supervised by Dr. Bahgat Korany Introduction: This research will attempt to examine how the changes in Israel’s security environment have affected the strategic usefulness of its nuclear weapons. Those changes can be summed up as: the fall of state-centered security threats and the rise, instead, of security threats stemming from Non-State Actors (NSAs) using asymmetric forms of warfare. A complex set of often interrelated political and strategic factors that were not confined to Middle Eastern political setting alone but extended to the rest of the world initiated these two simultaneous processes. Historically, the Israeli nuclear deterrent was developed during the 1950s and 1960s when Israel’s strategic setting was mainly dominated by state-centered security threats. Consequently, Israel was mainly concerned, at the time, with the threat of possible symmetrical military confrontations with its Arab neighbors – something that created a strategic value for its nuclear deterrent. Yet, a closer examination of the evolution of the Israeli security environment since 1982 will reveal that Non-State Actors (NSAs) that use asymmetrical forms of warfare, slowly but surely, came to dominate the Israeli security setting. Since then, Israel’s major security threats originated from NSAs operating in neighboring states (as in the case of Hezbollah in Lebanon) or from the Arab territories occupied in 1967, mainly the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, or from Israel's proper. -
ABSTRACT Title of Document: HAWKS to DOVES
ABSTRACT Title of Document: HAWKS TO DOVES: THE ROLE OF PERSONALITY IN FOREIGN POLICY DECISION-MAKING Guy Ziv, Ph. D., 2008 Directed by: Professor Shibley Telhami Anwar Sadat Professor for Peace and Development Department of Government and Politics Why do some hawkish leaders become doves, and what determines whether these leaders’ views affect dramatic change in a state’s foreign policy? Structural and domestic political explanations of foreign policy change tend to overlook the importance of leaders in such change. Political psychologists offer important insight into how and why certain leaders are inclined to revise their beliefs. Two psychological factors in particular hold great promise for explaining leaders’ foreign policy shifts: cognitive openness and cognitive complexity. Cognitively open leaders are receptive to new information and are thus more prone to changing their beliefs than cognitively closed leaders. Similarly, cognitively complex leaders recognize that distinct situations possess multiple dimensions, and so are more likely to engage in adaptive behavior than their cognitively simple counterparts. The primary case explored in this dissertation is that of Shimon Peres, who began his political career as a tough-minded hawk and, in mid-career, transformed into a leading dove. Peres is found to possess particularly high levels of cognitive openness and complexity, thus explaining why his dovish shift was more expansive and occurred sooner than did Yitzhak Rabin’s dovish turn. Begin and Shamir, by contrast, are found to be more cognitively closed and simple than either Peres or Rabin, thus explaining why these hawks remained hawks despite having witnessed the same systemic-structural and domestic political events as Peres and Rabin. -
Feinberg Graduate School 2016 Graduates Feinberg Graduate School Weizmann Institute of Science P.O
Feinberg Graduate School 2016 Graduates Feinberg Graduate School Weizmann Institute of Science P.O. Box 26, Rehovot 76100, Israel Phone: + 972-8-934-2924 Fax: + 972-8-934-4114 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.weizmann.ac.il/feinberg/ Department of Resource Development Phone: + 972-8-934-4582 Fax: + 972-8-934-6161 E-mail: [email protected] Design: www.dio-olamot.com Production team (in alphabetical order): Eti Colb-Uzana, Ami Eini, Adah Even-Zahav, Tali Galsky, Shiri Gerson, Tamar Morad, Meital Salmor, Dr. Ami Shalit, Raanan Yaacobi Photography: Itai Belson, Ohad Herches, Weizmann Institute Photography Lab Yael Ilan, Nir Kafri Production coordinator: Meital Salmor Weizmann Institute of Science | Feinberg Graduate School | 2016 Graduates Weizmann Institute of Science | Feinberg Graduate School | 2016 Graduates The Weizmann Institute of Science is one of the world’s leading institutions The of basic scientific research in all disciplines of natural and exact sciences: mathematics and computer sciences; physics; chemistry; biochemistry and Weizmann biology. Its scientists conduct studies in fields that are on the cutting edge of science and that serve to enrich human knowledge about the world around us and our role in the universe. The Institute’s unique character encourages Institute numerous multidisciplinary collaborations in all areas of research. Weizmann Institute investigations greatly further the development of new technologies of Science and alternative sources of energy and the invention of new materials, medicines, and state-of-the-art medical treatment. The Institute invests considerable efforts and resources in scientific education for school-aged children and the public. The Institute consists of some 3,000 scientists, students, and supporting staff. -
HANDBOOK of INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE This Publication Was Partly financed by a Printing Subsidy from the Fritz Thyssen Foundation
HANDBOOK OF INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE This publication was partly financed by a printing subsidy from the Fritz Thyssen Foundation. Handbook of Intergenerational Justice Edited by Joerg Chet Tremmel Scientific Director of the Foundation for the Rights of Future Generations, Germany Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK • Northampton, MA, USA © Joerg Chet Tremmel 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Glensanda House Montpellier Parade Cheltenham Glos GL50 1UA UK Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. 136 West Street Suite 202 Northampton Massachusetts 01060 USA A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Handbook of intergenerational justice / edited by Joerg Chet Tremmel. p. cm. – (Elgar original reference) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Justice. 2. Intergenerational relations. I. Tremmel, Joerg Chet, 1970- II. Series. JC578.H38 2006 320.01Ј1–dc22 2006005896 ISBN-13: 978 1 84542 900 3 ISBN-10: 1 84542 900 1 Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall. Contents List of figures vii List of tables viii Contributors ix Introduction 1 PART I FOUNDATIONS AND DEFINITIONS OF GENERATIONAL JUSTICE 1. Responsibility for future generations – scope and limits 23 Dieter Birnbacher 2. Principles of generational justice 39 Christoph Lumer 3. The impossibility of a theory of intergenerational justice 53 Wilfred Beckerman 4. John Rawls on the rights of future generations 72 Claus Dierksmeier 5. -
International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry
TENTH Congress of Qualitative Inquiry University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign www.icqi.org NOTE: We have not yet received some of the schedules for non-General Congress submissions which are not organized by the QI2014 Organizing Committee. Accepted panels or papers that are yet to be scheduled appear at the end of this program. We will post these schedules soon. 2 General information To find your name, just perform a Ctrl + F (or Command + F for Mac) search. Send correction requests to: [email protected] Be sure to include the Panel Number in the subject line of the email. Don't forget to register at the address below: http://icqi.org/registration.html General information 3 Living in the In Between: Theologically Informed Queer 1058 Performative Autoethnography 9:30-10:50 Chair: Mesner, Kerri (Session Organizer) Kerri Mesner, University of British Columbia, 1060 Conversation Roundtable and Paper Presentation 9:30-10:50 Chair: Bulfer, Brian (Session Organizer) Brian Bulfer, Teachers College, Columbia University, Arts-Based approaches and their implications for 1061 researchers in other fields 9:30-10:50 Chair: Kirakosyan, Lyusyena Arts-Based approaches and their implications for researchers in other fields, Lyusyena Kirakosyan, Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance, and Max Stephenson Jr., Virginia Tech Institute for Policy and Governance PhotoVoice extension into social movement theory: 1122 success and challenge (Conversation Roundtable) 1:00-2:20 Chair: Kennedy, Rachael E (Session Organizer) Rachael E Kennedy, Virginia