Customary and Legislative Aspects of Land Registration and Management on Communal Land in Namibia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Customary and Legislative Aspects of Land Registration and Management on Communal Land in Namibia Communal land in Namibia: a free for all Customary and legislative aspects of land registration and management on communal land in Namibia John Mendelsohn (RAISON – Research & Information Services of Namibia) December 2008 Report prepared for the Ministry of Land & Resettlement and the Rural Poverty Reduction Programme of the European Union Contents Summary_________________________________________________________3 Abbreviations and definitions_________________________________________5 Acknowledgements_________________________________________________5 Introduction_______________________________________________________6 Methods__________________________________________________________7 Functioning and structure of traditional authorities ________________________9 Recommendations___________________________________________14 Customary land registration _________________________________________14 Misunderstandings, confusions and objections_____________________15 Focus on higher levels of traditional authority ____________________17 Other aspects_______________________________________________18 Recommendations___________________________________________19 The management of communal land___________________________________22 Access to land ______________________________________________22 Inheritance_________________________________________________23 Commonages_______________________________________________25 The capture of land values by the elite ___________________________26 Recommendations___________________________________________29 APPENDICES 1. Caprivi____________________________________________________33 2. Damara ___________________________________________________40 3. Herero ____________________________________________________47 4. Kavango __________________________________________________56 5. Nama_____________________________________________________65 6. Owambo __________________________________________________74 7. San_______________________________________________________84 8. Tswana ___________________________________________________88 9. Dates and locations of meetings ________________________________92 10. Literature reviewed __________________________________________93 11. Further suggestions on the management of commonage pastures ______95 12. Further suggestions on the ownership of commonages ______________96 Communal land registration and management in Namibia 2 SUMMARY Senior members of the 46 recognized traditional authorities in Namibia were consulted to gather information on how communal land is managed and on the registration of customary land rights. The following major points emerged from the study. The traditional authorities (TAs) all have similar hierarchies: from local (usually village) headmen, to councillors or senior headmen and then to chiefs. There is, however, substantial variation in the sizes and histories of the TAs. Some have tens of thousands of households, while others have fewer than a hundred families under their jurisdiction. Several TAs do not have communal land, their communities being scattered in towns and on the land of other authorities. Most TAs in northern Namibia have existed for hundreds of years, have clear boundaries and well-established customary laws. By contrast, most recently formed TAs suffer from quarrels over boundaries and power struggles, and do not have customary statutes. With respect to the management of land, TAs are much weaker than is generally assumed. And they are further being weakened by the strengthening role of central and regional government, the creation of new local management institutions, the loss of constituents and land to urban areas, and the increasing numbers of wealthy, educated and influential people who have little regard for customary authority. The registration of customary land rights (CLR) for residential and farmland began in 2003 as a result of the Communal Land Reform Act of 2002 and Regulation No. 37 of 2003. Most people appear well informed of the need to register their land rights, but considerable confusion and misunderstandings were encountered, especially with regard to the 20-hectare limit on each property, the type and definition of farmland that may be registered, the size of a hectare, and the number of plots that can be registered as one property. Political affiliations, border disputes and encroachments by one traditional community onto land held by another community have led ten TAs to object to CLR. A variety of technical issues and loopholes were used to justify their objections, for example the payment of application fees for CLR amounts to people having to buy their land, that communal land will now be marketed, that grabbing of unregistered land will ensue, and that freedoms to occupy and clear new land will be curtailed. The lack of clear information and limited ability of the MLR to process CLR applications has meant that progress in registering land rights has been very slow: of some 70,000 applications submitted since 2003 for CLR, only about 4,000 have been approved. There is an obvious need for the MLR to accelerate its work on CLR, and to issue clear guidance to dispel the many misunderstandings and potential for grievances that have nothing to do with land registration. Other recommendations include the importance of using lower, local levels of traditional authority to check and endorse applications for customary land rights, and to find ways of handling the land rights of people living in national parks and places which do not have recognized TAs. Communal land registration and management in Namibia 3 With few exceptions, TAs only involve themselves in land management by controlling applications for people to reside on communal land. The ways in which these applications are assessed is governed largely by the relatedness and familiarity of the applicant and the need to avoid future disputes. TAs are therefore mainly gatekeepers and peacekeepers on communal land. Only Damara and Nama TAs consider the availability of water and grazing before allowing newcomers customary residential and farming rights, and only two San TAs place limits on the number of livestock that residents may keep. Most property on communal land is inherited by the spouse and offspring of the deceased. However, the fate of an estate is decided on the basis of three considerations: (a) land and a husband’s assets belong, to a greater or lesser degree, to his relatives in the village where he was born and spent his married life; (b) the future of the widow, particularly in relation to her prospects of remarrying, her social acceptance and fitness to manage her home and farming activities; and (c) the attitudes and customs of the deceased husband’s relatives. The government symbolically owns all communal land of which TAs are symbolic custodians. There is also good agreement between the requirements of CLR (as stipulated by government legislation) and customary controls over access (as exercised by traditional authorities) for residential and small farm (crop) land. But neither government legislation nor traditional law has much control over commonages. The resulting vacuum has allowed influential people with substantial non-farming incomes to acquire and privatise large areas of commonage, and to over-exploit grazing in commonages shared with permanent residents who depend largely on stock farming for their livelihoods. Large areas of communal land thus suffer from the ‘tragedy of the commons’ where the rich get richer, the poor become poorer, and environmental degradation intensifies. Considerable changes are needed to limit the capturing of resources and land values by the elite, and to give local residents both security of tenure and security over resources. It is proposed that the ownership of commonages be vested and registered in local management institutions in which local residents have both control and shares. Good models founded on these principles are provided by conservancies, community forests and water point associations. It is also recommended that tenure systems be developed to give long-term leaseholds to all residents on communal land. The leaseholds would provide people with the same economic opportunities and incentives for investment and savings now enjoyed by owners of freehold urban properties and farms. Communal land registration and management in Namibia 4 Abbreviations and definitions CLR = customary land registration; the process of registering residential and farmland in communal areas, as prescribed by the Communal Land Reform Act of 2002 and Regulation No. 37 (Regulations made in terms of the Communal Land Reform Act) issued on 24 February 2003. In the absence of special motivation from the applicant and the permission of the Minister of Lands & Resettlement, properties may not exceed 20 hectares. The endorsement of a recognized traditional authority is required to confirm that the applicant has a customary right to the land. Other communal land may be registered as leaseholds or remain unregistered commonage to which local residents have rights of access and use. CLB = communal land board. Each region has a communal land board which, among other things, assesses and approves applications for CLR covering properties less than 20 hectares. Members of the CLB serve in a voluntary capacity and are drawn from various sectors. CLBs operate under provisions of the Communal Land Reform Act of 2002 and Regulation No. 37 (Regulations made in terms of the Communal Land Reform Act) issued on 24 February 2003. MLR =
Recommended publications
  • Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2021 “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael R. Hogan West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the African History Commons Recommended Citation Hogan, Michael R., "“Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962" (2021). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 8264. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/8264 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Remov[e] Us From the Bondage of South Africa:” Transnational Resistance Strategies and Subnational Concessions in Namibia's Police Zone, 1919-1962 Michael Robert Hogan Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In History Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Tribal People's Rights Over Their Ancestral Lands
    INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09 30 December 2009 Original: Spanish INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter‐American Human Rights System 2010 Internet: http://www.cidh.org E‐mail: [email protected] OAS Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ancestrales y recursos naturales: Normas y jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos = Indigenous and tribal people’s rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: Norms and jurisprudence of the Inter‐American human rights system / [Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights.] p. ; cm. (OEA documentos oficiales ; OEA/Ser.L)(OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978‐0‐8270‐5580‐3 1. Human rights‐‐America. 2. Indigenous peoples‐‐Civil rights‐‐America. 3. Indigenous peoples‐‐Land tenure‐‐America. 4. Indigenous peoples‐‐Legal status, laws, etc.‐‐America. 5. Natural resources‐‐Law and legislation‐‐America. I. Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. II Series. III. Series. OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.56/09 Document published thanks to the financial support of Denmark and Spain Positions herein expressed are those of the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights and do not reflect the views of Denmark or Spain Approved by the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights on December 30, 2009 INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS MEMBERS Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero Víctor E. Abramovich Felipe González Sir Clare Kamau Roberts Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Florentín Meléndez Paolo G. Carozza ****** Executive Secretary: Santiago A.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity
    Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Natural Resources Institute University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba March, 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (c) 2008 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilms Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. i To the memory of my parents, and for Leslie ii ABSTRACT This study investigates the premise that national park designations and management in Southern Africa decoupled indigenous communities from their local ecosystems. The research explores ways and means to recouple communities and national parks to promote biodiversity. The relationships are characterized between Namibia’s community-based resource management program (CBNRM), conservancies, and protected areas system, with particular reference to the Ehi-rovipuka Conservancy and Etosha National Park in northern Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia a Violation of Trust
    AN OXFAM REPORT ON INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR POVERTY IN NAMIBIA M Y First Published 1986 ©Oxfam 1986 ISBN 0 85598 0761 Printed in Great Britain by Express Litho Service (Oxford) Published by Oxfam 274 Banbury Road Oxford 0X2 7DZ United Kingdom This book converted to digital file in 2010 Acknowledgements My main thanks must go to all the Namibian people who generously gave their time and expertise to help with the research for this book, particularly Oxfam friends and partners. I am also grateful to the Overseas Development Administration, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, the Catholic Institute for International Relations and the Namibian Support Committee for their assistance in providing information. Thanks are especially due for the time and advice given by all those who read and commented on the drafts. In particular, I am grateful to Richard Moorsom who helped with both research and editing, and to Justin Ellis, Julio Faundez, Peter Katjavivi, Prudence Smith, Paul Spray and Brian Wood. This book reflects the collective experience of Oxfam's work in Namibia over the past twenty-two years and I have therefore relied on the active collaboration of Oxfam staff and trustees. Sue Coxhead deserves special thanks for her help with research and typing. Finally, without the special help with childcare given by Mandy Bristow, Caroline Lovick and Prudence Smith, the book would never have seen the light of day. Susanna Smith March 1986 ANGOLA A M B I A 3*S^_5 Okavango Si Swamp .or Map 1: Namibia and its neighbours Map 2: Namibia B OTSWANA frontiers restricted areas 'homelands' tar roads AT LANTIC «~ other roads OCEAN railways rivers Luderi I capital city A main towns A mines: 1 TSUMEB copper/lead 2 ROSSING uranium 3 ORANJEMUNO diamonds Oranjemu Scale: 100 200 miles AFRICA Adapted from The Namibians, the Minority Rights Group report no.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats
    1 Electoral Commission of Namibia 2020 Local Authority Elections Results and Allocation of Seats Votes recorded per Seats Allocation per Region Local authority area Valid votes Political Party or Organisation Party/Association Party/Association Independent Patriots for Change 283 1 Landless Peoples Movement 745 3 Aranos 1622 Popular Democratic Movement 90 1 Rally for Democracy and Progress 31 0 SWANU of Namibia 8 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 465 2 Independent Patriots for Change 38 0 Landless Peoples Movement 514 3 Gibeon 1032 Popular Democratic Movement 47 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 433 2 Independent Patriots for Change 108 1 Landless People Movement 347 3 Gochas 667 Popular Democratic Movement 65 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 147 1 Independent Patriots for Change 97 1 Landless peoples Movement 312 2 Kalkrand 698 Popular Democratic Movement 21 0 Hardap Rally for Democracy and Progress 34 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 234 2 All People’s Party 16 0 Independent Patriots for Change 40 0 Maltahöhe 1103 Landless people Movement 685 3 Popular Democratic Movement 32 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 330 2 *Results for the following Local Authorities are under review and will be released as soon as this process has been completed: Aroab, Koës, Stampriet, Otavi, Okakarara, Katima Mulilo Hardap 2 Independent Patriots for Change 180 1 Landless Peoples Movement 1726 4 Mariental 2954 Popular Democratic Movement 83 0 Republican Party of Namibia 59 0 SWAPO Party of Namibia 906 2 Independent Patriots for Change 320 0 Landless Peoples Movement 2468 2 Rehoboth Independent Town
    [Show full text]
  • The German Colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German Rivalry, 1883-1915
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 7-1-1995 Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915 Matthew Erin Plowman University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Plowman, Matthew Erin, "Doors left open then slammed shut: The German colonization of Southwest Africa and the Anglo-German rivalry, 1883-1915" (1995). Student Work. 435. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/435 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOORS LEFT OPEN THEN SLAMMED SHUT: THE GERMAN COLONIZATION OF SOUTHWEST AFRICA AND THE ANGLO-GERMAN RIVALRY, 1883-1915. A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts University of Nebraska at Omaha by Matthew Erin Plowman July 1995 UMI Number: EP73073 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI Blsaartalibn Publish*rig UMI EP73073 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Communal Land and Agricultural Productivity ✩
    Communal Land and Agricultural Productivity ✩ Charles Gottlieb2,3,4, Jan Grobovˇsek1 September 26, 2016 Abstract Communal land tenure is a typical feature of many developing countries. Such tenure regimes implement a “use it or lose it” principle by imposing restrictions to land trans- ferability that are enforced via the threat of expropriation. This paper measures the distortionary impact of communal land in a dynamic general equilibrium model of oc- cupational selection, calibrated to Ethiopia. We find that lifting restrictions on land transferability lowers agricultural employment by 19% and increases GDP by 7%. It also results in a large reduction in the ratio between non-agricultural and agricultural productivity, by 40% in real and 44% in nominal terms. Limited land transferability rationalizes a substantial fraction of the large agricultural productivity gap in poor economies. The associated loss in aggregate productivity, though, is comparatively minor. Keywords: Agricultural productivity, Growth and development, Misallocation, Land, Africa, Ethiopia. JEL: O10, O13, O40, O55, Q15. ✩ First version: September 2014. This paper has benefited from helpful suggestions by Tasso Adamopoulos, Tekie Alemu, Douglas Gollin, Madina Guloba, Roland Hodler, Philipp Kircher, Winfried Koeniger, Francis Mwesigye and Alemayehu Taffesse, as well as seminar participants at the Atlanta Fed, Cambridge, Western Ontario, York, McMaster, McGill, the North American Econometric Society Meeting (Minneapolis), CEPR Macroeconomic and Growth Meeting, EDRI (Addis Ababa), EPRC (Kampala), DEGIT XXI Conference, and World Bank Land and Poverty Conference 2015. The finan- cial support from DFID/ESRC (ES/L012499/1) is gratefully acknowledged. Email addresses: [email protected] (Charles Gottlieb), [email protected] (Jan Grobovˇsek) 1University of Edinburgh, School of Economics 2University of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Negotiating Meaning and Change in Space and Material Culture: An
    NEGOTIATING MEANING AND CHANGE IN SPACE AND MATERIAL CULTURE An ethno-archaeological study among semi-nomadic Himba and Herera herders in north-western Namibia By Margaret Jacobsohn Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town July 1995 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. Figure 1.1. An increasingly common sight in Opuwo, Kunene region. A well known postcard by Namibian photographer TONY PUPKEWITZ ,--------------------------------------·---·------------~ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Ideas in this thesis originated in numerous stimulating discussions in the 1980s with colleagues in and out of my field: In particular, I thank my supervisor, Andrew B. Smith, Martin Hall, John Parkington, Royden Yates, Lita Webley, Yvonne Brink and Megan Biesele. Many people helped me in various ways during my years of being a nomad in Namibia: These include Molly Green of Cape Town, Rod and Val Lichtman and the Le Roux family of Windhoek. Special thanks are due to my two translators, Shorty Kasaona, and the late Kaupiti Tjipomba, and to Garth Owen-Smith, who shared with me the good and the bad, as well as his deep knowledge of Kunene and its people. Without these three Namibians, there would be no thesis. Field assistance was given by Tina Coombes and Denny Smith.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Anticommons: Historical Land Privatization and Modern
    Creating Anticommons: Historical Land Privatization and Modern Natural Resource Use1 Bryan Leonard Arizona State University [email protected] Dominic Parker University of Wisconsin, Madison [email protected] May 31, 2017 Abstract: We explain how privatizing the commons to promote use of one land-based resource (agriculture) discourages use of another (shale oil). We test for this ‘anticommons’ problem using a natural experiment on the Bakken, one of the world's largest shale reserves. Before oil discovery, U.S. land policies inadvertently created a mosaic of private and tribal subsurface ownership on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation. We compare horizontal drilling across parcels during the 2005-2015 fracking boom and find that fragmented ownership significantly reduced royalty income, relative to contiguous tribal ownership. This evidence highlights a cost of subdividing land containing spatially expansive natural resources. Key words: anticommons, oil, indigenous policy, transaction costs, resource booms, privatization JEL Codes: O13, Q32, Q33, D23, H82, K11 1 For helpful comments, we thank Alex Rothenberg, Jane Friesen, Dean Lueck, Donna Feir, Gary Libecap, Terry Anderson, Shawn Regan, Tim Fitzgerald, Dan Benjamin, Ronald Trosper, and seminar participants at Simon Fraser U., Stanford U. (Hoover Economic Policy Talk), U. of Illinois, U. of Hawaii, UC-Riverside, and the Property and Environment Research Center. We also thank attendees of conference sessions hosted by SOIE, UC Santa Barbara, WEAI, AERE, and the Midwest International Development Conference. We are grateful to Matt Kelly, an attorney of Tarlow and Stonecipher PLLC for helpful discussions about oil and gas leasing on the Bakken. I. Introduction Much of the world’s indigenous populations live on communally owned land and this ownership structure has likely hindered development.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia Flash Appeal 2001
    SAMPLE OF ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATING IN CONSOLIDATED APPEALS AARREC COSV HT MDM TGH ACF CRS Humedica MEDAIR UMCOR ACTED CWS IA MENTOR UNAIDS ADRA Danchurchaid ILO MERLIN UNDP Africare DDG IMC NCA UNDSS AMI-France Diakonie Emergency Aid INTERMON NPA UNEP ARC DRC Internews NRC UNESCO ASB EM-DH INTERSOS OCHA UNFPA ASI FAO IOM OHCHR UN-HABITAT AVSI FAR IPHD OXFAM UNHCR CARE FHI IR PA (formerly ITDG) UNICEF CARITAS Finnchurchaid IRC PACT UNIFEM CEMIR FSD IRD PAI UNJLC INTERNATIONAL GAA IRIN Plan UNMAS CESVI GOAL IRW PMU-I UNOPS CFA GTZ Islamic RW PU UNRWA CHF GVC JOIN RC/Germany VIS CHFI Handicap International JRS RCO WFP CISV HealthNet TPO LWF Samaritan's Purse WHO CMA HELP Malaria Consortium SECADEV World Concern CONCERN HelpAge International Malteser Solidarités World Relief Concern Universal HKI Mercy Corps SUDO WV COOPI Horn Relief MDA TEARFUND ZOA CORDAID 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE I: REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING TO DATE PER CLUSTER................................................................. 3 TABLE II: REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING TO DATE PER PRIORITY LEVEL...................................................... 3 TABLE III: REQUIREMENTS AND FUNDING TO DATE PER ORGANIZATION ....................................................... 4 2. CONTEXT AND HUMANITARIAN CONSEQUENCES ................................................................... 5 2.1 CONTEXT AND RESPONSE TO DATE ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL SCOPING REPORT March 2021
    App- 002400 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT ON PORTION B & C OF THE FARM EPUKIRO RESERVE NO. 329, OTJINENE FINAL SCOPING REPORT March 2021 Project Title: OTJINENE TOWNSHIP ESTABLISHMENT Type of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPING ASSESSMENT Project Location: REMAINDER OF PORTION 1 OF THE FARM EPUKIRO RESERVE NO. 329 Competent Authority: MINISTRY OF URBAN AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT NAMIBIA PLANNING AND ADVISORY BOARD / TOWNSHIPS BOARD PRIVATE BAG 13289 WINDHOEK NAMIBIA Approving Authority DIRECTORATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND TOURISM PRIVATE BAG 13306 WINDHOEK Proponent/Client: OTJINENE VILLAGE COUNCIL P.O. BOX 1005, OTJINENE OTJINENE Consultancy: WINPLAN PO BOX 90761, KLEIN WINDHOEK TEL.: (061) 246 761 E-MAIL: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF MAPS .......................................................................................................................................... iv APPENDICES ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People, Cattle and Land - Transformations of Pastoral Society
    People, Cattle and Land - Transformations of Pastoral Society Michael Bollig and Jan-Bart Gewald Everybody living in Namibia, travelling to the country or working in it has an idea as to who the Herero are. In Germany, where most of this book has been compiled and edited, the Herero have entered the public lore of German colonialism alongside the East African askari of German imperial songs. However, what is remembered about the Herero is the alleged racial pride and conservatism of the Herero, cherished in the mythico-histories of the German colonial experiment, but not the atrocities committed by German forces against Herero in a vicious genocidal war. Notions of Herero, their tradition and their identity abound. These are solid and ostensibly more homogeneous than visions of other groups. No travel guide without photographs of Herero women displaying their out-of-time victorian dresses and Herero men wearing highly decorated uniforms and proudly riding their horses at parades. These images leave little doubt that Herero identity can be captured in photography, in contrast to other population groups in Namibia. Without a doubt, the sight of massed ranks of marching Herero men and women dressed in scarlet and khaki, make for excellent photographic opportunities. Indeed, the populär image of the Herero at present appears to depend entirely upon these impressive displays. Yet obviously there is more to the Herero than mere picture post-cards. Herero have not been passive targets of colonial and present-day global image- creators. They contributed actively to the formulation of these images and have played on them in order to achieve political aims and create internal conformity and cohesion.
    [Show full text]