ESSAYS on the DRUG DISCOVERY INNOVATION SYSTEM By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ESSAYS on the DRUG DISCOVERY INNOVATION SYSTEM By ESSAYS ON THE DRUG DISCOVERY INNOVATION SYSTEM by Alfred Sarkissian A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of George Mason University in Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Public Policy Committee: _______________________________________ David M. Hart, Chair _______________________________________ Siona Listokin _______________________________________ Naoru Koizumi Ruben Jacobo-Rubio, External Reader _______________________________________ Sita N. Slavov, Program Director _______________________________________ Mark J. Rozell, Dean Date: __________________________________ Fall Semester 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Essays on the Drug Discovery Innovation System A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at George Mason University by Alfred Sarkissian Master of Arts Allameh Tabatabai University, 2002 Bachelor of Arts Azad University, 1997 Director: David M. Hart, Professor Department of Public Policy; Schar School of Policy and Government Fall Semester 2017 George Mason University Fairfax, VA Copyright 2017 Alfred Sarkissian All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I need to express my deepest gratitude to my committee chair Prof. David M. Hart for his advice, mentorship, and patience in the course of this dissertation and the program. I also owe a sincere appreciation to other committee members Prof. Naoru Koizumi and Prof. Siona Listokin. Prof. Mark Addleson was forthcoming with his time during the field stage of the doctoral program. Special thanks to the administrative staff of the Schar School of Policy and Government. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables................................................................................................................ vii List of Figures ............................................................................................................. viii List of Equations .............................................................................................................x List of Abbreviations and/or Symbols ............................................................................ xi Abstract ........................................................................................................................ xii Chapter One: Introduction - The Drug Discovery Paradox ...............................................1 1.1 Eroom’s Law ..........................................................................................................1 1.2 Scientific and Technological Advances ..................................................................8 1.3 R&D Management .................................................................................................9 1.4 R&D Spending ..................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 15 Chapter Two: Exploring the Drivers of Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Sector - The Impact of Knowledge Recombination ............................................................................ 17 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Literature Review ................................................................................................. 19 2.2.1 Role of Science in Pharmaceutical Innovation ................................................ 20 2.2.2 Knowledge Recombination and Innovation .................................................... 26 2.3 Research Question and Hypotheses ...................................................................... 28 2.4 Data ..................................................................................................................... 33 2.5 Methods ............................................................................................................... 36 2.6 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 41 2.7 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 52 Chapter Three: From Bench to Bedside – Determinants of Breakthrough Drug Discovery ...................................................................................................................................... 55 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Literature Review ................................................................................................. 59 iv 3.2.1 Theoretical Lens ............................................................................................ 59 3.2.2 Properties of Knowledge ................................................................................ 60 3.2.3 Scope of the Invention ................................................................................... 63 3.2.4 Physical Sources of Knowledge ..................................................................... 64 3.3 Research Question and Hypotheses ...................................................................... 66 3.3.1 Application Breadth or Generality.................................................................. 67 3.3.2 Legal and Technological Scope of the Invention ............................................ 69 3.3.3 Knowledge Recombination Profile ................................................................. 71 3.4 Data ..................................................................................................................... 76 3.5 Methods ............................................................................................................... 84 3.6 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 87 3.6.1 Drug Substance Patents .................................................................................. 95 3.6.2 Pre-1995 Knowledge Recombination ............................................................. 98 3.7 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 100 Chapter Four: Drug Discovery Innovation: A Systemic View ...................................... 103 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 103 4.2 Conceptual Framework ...................................................................................... 105 4.2.1 Systemic Levels of Analysis ........................................................................ 105 4.2.2 Structural versus Functional Perspectives ..................................................... 110 4.3 Historical Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Sector .............................................. 114 4.4 Institutional Set-up ............................................................................................. 117 4.5 Research Question .............................................................................................. 119 4.6 Data and Methods .............................................................................................. 121 4.6.1 Survey Instrument ........................................................................................ 121 4.6.2 Respondents................................................................................................. 129 4.7 R&D and Innovation Trends............................................................................... 139 4.8 Drivers of Innovation ......................................................................................... 144 4.8.1 Prioritizing Drivers of Innovation: Survey Insights ...................................... 144 4.8.2 Resource Mobilization ................................................................................. 148 4.9 Barriers to Innovation ......................................................................................... 158 4.10 Systemic Failures and Eroom’s Law ................................................................. 165 4.10.1 Lock-in or Path Dependency Failures ......................................................... 165 v 4.10.2 Hard and Soft Intuitional Failure ................................................................ 169 4.10.3 Transition Failures ..................................................................................... 174 4.11 Recommendations and Generalizability of Survey Responses ........................... 175 4.12 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 181 4.13 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 186 Chapter Five: Conclusion and Policy Implications ....................................................... 189 Appendix A – Chapter Two Supplemental Information................................................ 198 Appendix B – Chapter Three Supplemental Information .............................................. 238 Appendix C – Chapter Four Supplemental Information................................................ 241 References ................................................................................................................... 264 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1
Recommended publications
  • Biotechnology Worldwide
    Biotechnology Worldwide There are several countries that are making special efforts to both develop and capitalise on Biotechnology. Chief amongst them is America, though cutting edge work is also going on in the UK, Ireland, Germany, Korea, Singapore, China and Japan. • America is the world leader in biotechnology, it has 1,379 biotechnology companies and employs 174,000 people. It spends £9 billion on research into biotechnology. • The European market for goods and services dependent on biotechnology is currently estimated at £30 billion and is forecast to exceed £100 billion by the year 2005 • The UK leads Europe in biotechnology and employs 19,000 people • The UK has 300 dedicated biotechnology companies and a further 250-300 involved in broader bioscience related activities • The industrial sectors which stand to benefit from biotechnology are pharmaceutical, agriculture, food and drink, chemicals and environmental technologies • Germany is the second strongest country in Europe, with 332 companies but fewer products in development than the UK. UK The UK biotechnology industry is regarded as second only to the huge effort taking place in the States. UK biotechnology companies generate over a billion pounds in revenue; half of this is pumped back into research and development. The industry has particular strengths, for example: • Britain was a key player in the world wide project of sequencing the 30,000 genes of the human genome. The announcement of the first working draft of the human genome marks a significant step forward in our understanding of the way in which we understand and develop treatments for incurable genetic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Etf-Sparpläne
    ETF-SPARPLÄNE ISIN NAME IE00B8KGV557 ISHARES EDGE MSCI EM MIN VOL USD (ACC) IE00B86MWN23 ISHARES EDGE MSCI EUROPE MIN VOLATILITY EUR (ACC) IE00B8FHGS14 ISHARES EDGE MSCI WORLD MIN VOLATILITY USD (ACC) IE00B6SPMN59 ISHARES EDGE S&P 500 MIN VOL USD (ACC) IE00B87G8S03 ISHARES GLOBAL AAA-AA GOV BOND USD (DIST) DE0005933931 ISHARES CORE DAX EUR (ACC) IE0032523478 ISHARES CORP BOND LARGE CAP EUR (DIST) IE00B14X4T88 ISHARES ASIA PACIFIC DIVIDEND USD (DIST) IE00B1W57M07 ISHARES BRIC 50 USD (DIST) DE000A0F5UG3 ISHARES DOW JONES EU SUSTAINABLE EUR (DIST) IE00B6R52143 ISHARES AGRIBUSINESS USD (ACC) IE00B0M62Y33 ISHARES AEX EUR (DIST) DE000A0D8Q23 ISHARES ATX EUR (DIST) IE00B1FZSC47 ISHARES USD TIPS USD (ACC) IE00B14X4S71 ISHARES USD TREASURY BOND 1-3Y USD (DIST) IE00B1FZS798 ISHARES USD TREASURY BOND 7-10Y USD (DIST) IE00B1FZSD53 ISHARES GBP INDEX-LINKED GILTS GBP (DIST) IE00B6QGFW01 ISHARES EMERGING ASIA LOCAL GOV BOND USD (DIST) IE00B5M4WH52 ISHARES JPM EM LOCAL GOV BOND USD (DIST) IE00B3DKXQ41 ISHARES EURO AGGREGATE BOND EUR (DIST) IE00B3F81R35 ISHARES CORE EURO CORP BOND EUR (DIST) IE00B4L60045 ISHARES EURO CORP BOND 1-5Y EUR (DIST) IE00B4L5ZG21 ISHARES EURO CORP BOND EX-FIN EUR (DIST) IE00B4L5ZY03 ISHARES EURO CORP BOND EX-FIN 1-5Y EUR (DIST) IE00B6X2VY59 ISHARES EURO CORP BOND INT. RATE HEDGED (DIST) IE00B14X4Q57 ISHARES EURO GOV BOND 1-3Y EUR (DIST) IE00B4WXJH41 ISHARES EURO GOV BOND 10-15Y EUR (DIST) IE00B1FZS913 ISHARES EURO GOV BOND 15-30Y EUR (DIST) IE00B1FZS681 ISHARES EURO GOV BOND 3-5Y EUR (DIST) IE00B4WXJG34 ISHARES EURO GOV BOND
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines with Regard to the Composition, Calculation and Management of the Index
    INDEX METHODOLOGY Solactive Pharma Breakthrough Value Index Version 2.1 dated September 03, 2020 Contents Important Information 1. Index specifications 1.1 Short Name and ISIN 1.2 Initial Value 1.3 Distribution 1.4 Prices and Calculation Frequency 1.5 Weighting 1.6 Index Committee 1.7 Publication 1.8 Historical Data 1.9 Licensing 2. Composition of the Index 2.1 Selection of the Index Components 2.2 Ordinary Adjustment 2.3 Extraordinary Adjustment 3. Calculation of the Index 3.1 Index Formula 3.2 Accuracy 3.3 Adjustments 3.4 Dividends and other Distributions 3.5 Corporate Actions 3.6 Correction Policy 3.7 Market Disruption 3.8 Consequences of an Extraordinary Event 4. Definitions 5. Appendix 5.1 Contact Details 5.2 Calculation of the Index – Change in Calculation Method 2 Important Information This document (“Index Methodology Document”) contains the underlying principles and regulations regarding the structure and the operating of the Solactive Pharma Breakthrough Value Index. Solactive AG shall make every effort to implement regulations. Solactive AG does not offer any explicit or tacit guarantee or assurance, neither pertaining to the results from the use of the Index nor the Index value at any certain point in time nor in any other respect. The Index is merely calculated and published by Solactive AG and it strives to the best of its ability to ensure the correctness of the calculation. There is no obligation for Solactive AG – irrespective of possible obligations to issuers – to advise third parties, including investors and/or financial intermediaries, of any errors in the Index.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Section 13F Securities, First Quarter, 2014
    List of Section 13F Securities First Quarter FY 2014 Copyright (c) 2014 American Bankers Association. CUSIP Numbers and descriptions are used with permission by Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No redistribution without permission from Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau. Standard & Poors CUSIP Service Bureau does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the CUSIP Numbers and standard descriptions included herein and neither the American Bankers Association nor Standard & Poor's CUSIP Service Bureau shall be responsible for any errors, omissions or damages arising out of the use of such information. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission OFFICIAL LIST OF SECTION 13(f) SECURITIES USER INFORMATION SHEET General This list of “Section 13(f) securities” as defined by Rule 13f-1(c) [17 CFR 240.13f-1(c)] is made available to the public pursuant to Section13 (f) (3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 USC 78m(f) (3)]. It is made available for use in the preparation of reports filed with the Securities and Exhange Commission pursuant to Rule 13f-1 [17 CFR 240.13f-1] under Section 13(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. An updated list is published on a quarterly basis. This list is current as of March 15, 2014, and may be relied on by institutional investment managers filing Form 13F reports for the calendar quarter ending March 31, 2014. Institutional investment managers should report holdings--number of shares and fair market value--as of the last day of the calendar quarter as required by [ Section 13(f)(1) and Rule 13f-1] thereunder.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Allison University Endowment Fund Holdings As of December 31, 2017
    Mount Allison University Endowment Fund Holdings As of December 31, 2017 Security Name Market Value ($Can) EQUITY HOLDINGS Canadian Holdings 5N PLUS INC $ 155 ABSOLUTE SOFTWARE CORP $ 851 ACADIAN TIMBER CORP $ 302 ADVANTAGE OIL & GAS LTD $ 283,788 AECON GROUP INC $ 1,728 AFRICA OIL CORP $ 684 AG GROWTH INTERNATIONAL INC $ 1,163 AGELLAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE $ 349 AGF MANAGEMENT LTD $ 990 AGNICO-EAGLE MINES LTD $ 427,207 AGT FOOD AND INGREDIENTS INC $ 653 AIMIA INC $ 832 AIR CANADA INC $ 325,411 AIRBOSS OF AMERICA CORP $ 315 ALACER GOLD CORP $ 1,289 ALAMOS GOLD INC $ 2,216 ALAMOS GOLD INC NEW COM CLASS A $ 4,877 ALARIS ROYALTY CORP $ 1,107 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP $ 330 ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC $ 98,854 ALIO GOLD INC $ 472 ALLIED PROPERTIES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST $ 2,575 ALTIUS MINERALS CORP $ 1,233 ALTUS GROUP LTD/CANADA $ 1,916 ANDREW PELLER LTD $ 1,448 ARGONAUT GOLD INC $ 656 ARTIS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST $ 1,539 ASANKO GOLD INC $ 209 ATCO LTD $ 119,947 ATHABASCA OIL COP $ 703 ATS AUTOMATION TOOLING SYSTEMS INC $ 1,769 AURICO METALS INC $ 311 AUTOCANADA INC $ 1,128 AVIGILON CORP $ 1,258 B2GOLD CORP $ 29,898 BADGER DAYLIGHTING LTD $ 1,525 BANK OF MONTREAL $ 725,449 BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA $ 2,019,757 BARRICK GOLD CORP $ 459,749 BAYTEX ENERGY CORP $ 1,213 BCE INC $ 791,441 BELLATRIX EXPLORATION LTD $ 94 BIRCHCLIFF ENERGY LTD $ 1,479 BIRD CONSTRUCTION INC $ 731 1 Mount Allison University Endowment Fund Holdings As of December 31, 2017 Security Name Market Value ($Can) BLACK DIAMOND GROUP LTD $ 95 BLACKBERRY LIMITED $ 151,777 BLACKPEARL RESOURCES INC $ 672 BOARDWALK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST $ 1,610 BONAVISTA ENERGY CORP $ 686 BONTERRA ENERGY CORP $ 806 BORALEX INC $ 2,276 BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED $ 672,870 BROOKFIELD INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Biopartnering Executive Summary
    BIOWORLD® BIOPARTNERING REPORT 2009: STRATEGIES AND PARADIGMS OF THE DEAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY By Michael Harris, BioWorld Executive Editor and Amanda Lyle, BioWorld Managing Editor LIST OF CONTENTS Introduction and Analysis Trends Depressing First Half of 2008 in Worldwide Public Markets Drug/Device Combos Could Salvage Dropped Compounds A Match Made in Heaven; R&D Productivity Via Partnering Drug and Medical Device Deals: A Different Type of Partnership As Big Pharma Model Falters, Biotech Rides to the Rescue Deals to M&As: The Culture of False-Flagging, Shape-Shifting Notable Deals Autoimmune and Inflammation Deals Immunomedics Inks Potential $620M Deal with Nycomed ARYx Seeking New Partner for GI Program after P&G Bails Out UCB Licenses Keppra, Cimzia Rights in Japan Alizyme, Norgine Team Up in $67M Marketing Deal Bionomics Signs Merck Serono in MS, Autoimmune Partnership TransPharma Gets $35M in Osteo Deal with Lilly QLT Sells Acne Gel Product Aczone for $150M to Allergan Start-up TFT Adds NF-Kappa B Decoy Program from Anesiva Early Stage Antibody Nets EUSA $44M from GSK Scil, Pfizer Enter $250M Deal for Preclinical Osteo Drug Catalyst Partners with Centocor for Engineered Protease Drugs Galapagos Inks $395M Deal with Lilly for Osteo Drugs Alba Inks Ex-U.S./Japan Deal with Shire for Celiac Drug Excaliard Snags $15.5M and Isis Fibrosis Drugs Galapagos and Janssen in RA Partnership Axcan, Cellerix Deal for Adult Stem Cell Therapy Radius Grants Novartis Option to BA058 in Potential $500M Deal Microbia, Forest Collaborate: Up to $330M for
    [Show full text]
  • Biotech Anglais270
    L’INFORMATION STRATÉGIQUE DE L’ESPACE EUROPÉEN DE L’INNOVATION Biotechnologies FINANCES IAL EC & P S TH HALF 2005S N° 270 • December 26th 2005 11 HOUR nd 2 L www.biotech-finances.com A € D E 2005: The European Giant Sommaire Stirs from Slumber 11th hour • 2005: The European Giant Stirs 2004 was a disappointment for the biotech and medtech commu- from Slumber ............................p. 1-3 nity. IPOs failed, new finance proved difficult and complicated to Special €Deals find, and attempts at consolidation were stillborn. This meant that many players and observers in the life sciences industry went into The British Isles 2005 believing that mergers and acquisitions were likely to be the • « Biotech in UK are ready to explore new business models » ..............p. 4 main salvation of biotech and medtech. • « There is a lot of interest on the Irish part in going down the IPO road on AIM » ............................p. 4 And yet, 2005 has produced a remarkably good vintage! An IPO window France opened and a number of impressive financing rounds have been achie- • « Technology Transfer has become one major stake » ......................p. 7 ved. The recovery also saw successful consolidation take place. Opportu- nism and opportunity have been the watchwords of the year. German speaking countries The wounds sustained by the biotech industry after the stock market • « Many companies have products in Phase II or Phase III » ............p. 8 bubble burst seem to be healing. Youthful exuberance has returned. More • « We remain positive about the mature projects are now being presented to investors - who themelves prospects for 2006 »......................p.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Medicines in Development for Rare Diseases a LIST of ORPHAN DRUGS in the PIPELINE
    2016 Medicines in Development for Rare Diseases A LIST OF ORPHAN DRUGS IN THE PIPELINE Autoimmune Diseases Product Name Sponsor Official FDA Designation* Development Status Actemra® Genentech treatment of systemic sclerosis Phase III tocilizumab South San Francisco, CA www.gene.com Adempas® Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals treatment of systemic sclerosis Phase II riociguat Whippany, NJ www.pharma.bayer.com ARA 290 Araim Pharmaceuticals treatment of neuropathic pain in patients Phase II Tarrytown, NY with sarcoidosis www.ariampharma.com ARG201 arGentis Pharmaceuticals treatment of diffuse systemic sclerosis Phase II (type 1 native bovine skin Collierville, TN www.argentisrx.com collagen) BYM338 Novartis Pharmaceuticals treatment of inclusion body myositis Phase III (bimagrumab) East Hanover, NJ www.novartis.com CCX168 ChemoCentryx treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic Phase II (5a receptor antagonist) Mountain View, CA auto-antibodies associated vasculitides www.chemocentryx.com (granulomatosis with polyangitis or Wegener's granulomatosis), microscopic polyangitis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome * This designation is issued by the FDA's Office of Orphan Products Development while the drug is still in development. The designation makes the sponsor of the drug eligible for entitlements under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983. The entitlements include seven years of marketing exclusivity following FDA approval of the drug for the designated use. Medicines in Development: Rare Diseases | 2016 1 Autoimmune Diseases Product Name Sponsor Official FDA
    [Show full text]
  • Abbott Labora Tories Zambon Actelion Wockhardt Ajinomoto W a Tson Pharmaceuticals Alexion Pharmaceuticals W Arner Chilcott Aller
    ZAMBON ABBOTT LABORATORIES WOCKHARDT ACTELION WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS AJINOMOTO WARNER CHILCOTT ALEXION PHARMACEUTICALS VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS ALLERGAN VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS ALMIRALL UNITED THERAPEUTICS AMGEN UCB AMYLIN PHARMACEUTICALS TORAY INDUSTRIES ASAHI KASEI TEVA ASPEN PHARMACARE TEIJIN ASTELLAS TAKEDA ASTRAZENECA TAISHO PHARMACEUTICAL BAXTER INTERNATIONAL SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES BAYER STADA BIOGEN IDEC SIGMA-TAU BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM SHIRE BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB SHIONOGI CADILA SERVIER CELGENE SAWAI PHARMACEUTICAL CHIESI SANTEN CIPLA SANOFI COVIDIEN ROCHE CSL RECORDATI CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS PIERRE FABRE DAIICHI SANKYO PHARMSTANDARD DAINIPPON SUMITOMO PFIZER DONG-A PAR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES dr reddy’s OTSUKA HOLDINGS EISAI ORION PHARMA ELAN ONO PHARMACEUTICAL ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS NOVO NORDISK ESTEVE NOVARTIS FERRING NIPPON SHINYAKU FOREST LABORATORIES MYLAN GALDERMA MOCHIDA GALENICA AG MITSUBISHI TANABE GEDEON RICHTER 100 MERZ GILEAD SCIENCES MERCK KGAA GLAXOSMITHKLINE MERCK & CO GREEN CROSS MENARINI GRUENENTHAL MEIJI HOLDINGS HISAMITSU MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL HOSPIRA MEDA IPSEN MARUHO JAPAN TOBACCO LUPIN JOHNSON & JOHNSON LUNDBECK KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL LILLY KISSEI LEO PHARMA KRKA KYOWA HAKKO KIRIN KYORIN HOLDINGS Pharma&Biotech Looking for an Easier Way? Bridge the Gap with Lonza’s Easy Access Services for ADCs Lonza offers early development and manufacturing services for your antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). Take advantage of the best characteristics of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the potency of cytotoxic molecules
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Scientific Program Committee All Relationships Are Considered Compensated
    2019 Scientific Program Committee All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless otherwise noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution Patents, Stock and Other Travel, Royalties, Other Expert Other Name Employment Leadership Ownership Honoraria Consulting or Advisory Role Speakers' Bureau Research Funding Accommodations, Intellectual Testimony Relationship Interests Expenses Property Monica M. Leap Syntalogic, Syntimmune Abbvie (Inst), Agenus (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), AstraZeneca Bertagnolli Therapeutics (Inst), Baxalta (Inst), Bayer Health (Inst), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Inst), Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Complion (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Exelixis (Inst), Genentech (Inst), GHI Pharma (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Leidos (Inst), Lexicon (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Matrex (Inst), Mayo Clinic (Inst), Merck (Inst), MGH (Inst), Millenium Pharamceuticals (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Inst), Sagerock Advisors (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Tesaro (Inst), Teva (Inst) Suzanne George Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint ARIAD (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Blueprint Medicines (Inst), Deciphera UptoDate Bayer Research to Abbvie (I), Allergan (I) Medicines, Deciphera, Lilly (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pfizer (Inst) Practice Melissa
    [Show full text]
  • Silence Therapeutics
    THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt about the contents of this document and the action you should take, you are recommended immediately to seek your own advice from a person duly authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended) who specialises in advising on the acquisition of shares and other securities. If you have sold or otherwise transferred all of your Ordinary Shares in Silence Therapeutic s plc or prior to 15 December 2009 a sale or transfer is effected, please send this document, together with the Form of Proxy, to the purchaser or transferee or to the stockbroker, bank or other agent through whom the sale or transfer was effected. This document constitutes an admission document drawn up in accordance with the AIM Rules for Companies and does not comprise a prospectus prepared in accordance with the Prospectus Rules of the UK Listing Authority made under section 73A of FSMA, and it has not been, and will not be, approved or filed with the Financial Services Authority under the Prospectus Rules. The Directors and the Proposed Directors , whose names appear on page 3 of this document, accept individual and collective responsibility for the information contained in this document including individual and collective responsibility for compliance with the AIM Rules. To the best of the knowledge of the Directors and the Proposed Directors (who have taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this document is in accordance with the facts and contains no omission likely to affect the import of such information.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Medicines in Development for Cancer
    2018 Medicines in Development for Cancer Bladder Cancer Product Name Sponsor Indication Development Phase ABI-009 AADi Bioscience non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Phase I/II (nab-rapamycin/mTOR inhibitor) Los Angeles, CA www.aadibio.com ALT-801 Altor BioScience non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Phase I/II (tumor antigen-specific T-cell Miramar, FL www.altorbioscience.com receptor linked to IL-2) NantKwest Culver City, CA ALT-803 Altor BioScience non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Phase II (IL-15 superagonist protein complex) Miramar, FL (BCG naïve) (Fast Track), www.altorbioscience.com NantKwest non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Culver City, CA (BCG unresponsive) (Fast Track) B-701 BioClin Therapeutics 2L locally advanced or metastatic Phase I/II (anti-FGFR3 mAb) San Ramon, CA bladder cancer www.bioclintherapeutics.com Bavencio® EMD Serono 1L urothelial cancer Phase III avelumab Rockland, MA www.emdserono.com (anti-PD-L1 inhibitor) Pfizer www.pfizer.com New York, NY BC-819 BioCanCell Therapeutics non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Phase II (gene therapy) Cambridge, MA (Fast Track) www.biocancell.com Medicines in Development: Cancer ǀ 2018 1 Bladder Cancer Product Name Sponsor Indication Development Phase Capzola® Spectrum Pharmaceuticals non-muscle invasive bladder cancer application submitted apaziquone Henderson, NV (Fast Track) www.sppirx.com Cavatak® Viralytics bladder cancer (+pembrolizumab) Phase I coxsackievirus Sydney, Australia www.viralytics.com CG0070 Cold Genesys non-muscle invasive bladder cancer Phase II (oncolytic immunotherapy)
    [Show full text]