The Mathematical Work of the 1998 Fields Medalists James Lepowsky, Joram Lindenstrauss, Yuri I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mathematical Work of the 1998 Fields Medalists James Lepowsky, Joram Lindenstrauss, Yuri I fields.qxp 11/13/98 11:22 AM Page 17 The Mathematical Work of the 1998 Fields Medalists James Lepowsky, Joram Lindenstrauss, Yuri I. Manin, and John Milnor vide the order of the “Monster” sporadic finite The Work of simple group M, a group of order about 1054 “dis- covered” by B. Fischer and R. Griess but not yet proved to exist at the time. Ogg offered a bottle of Richard E. Borcherds Jack Daniels whiskey for an explanation. James Lepowsky In 1978–79, J. McKay, J. Thompson, J. H. Con- way, and S. Norton explosively enriched this nu- Much of Richard Borcherds’s brilliant work is merology [CN] and in particular conjectured the ex- related to the remarkable subject of Monstrous istence of a natural infinite-dimensional Z-graded Moonshine. This started quietly in the 1970s when \ \ representation (let us call it V = n 1 Vn ) of A. Ogg noticed a curious coincidence spanning ≥− the conjectured group M that wouldL have the two apparently unrelated areas of mathematics— following property: For each of the 194 conjugacy the theory of modular functions and the theory of classes in M, choose a representative g M, ∈ finite simple groups. and consider the “graded trace” Jg(q)= There are fifteen prime numbers p for which the n 2i n 1(tr g V \ )q , where q = e , in the upper normalizer of the congruence subgroup (p) in ≥− | n 0 half-plane.P Then the McKay-Thompson series Jg SL(2, R) has the “genus-zero property”; that is, the should be a (specified) Hauptmodul for a suitable Γ compactification of the upper half-plane modulo discrete subgroup of SL(2, R) with the genus-zero this normalizer is a Riemann surface of genus property, and, in particular, J1 (corresponding to zero, so that the field of modular functions in- 1 M ) should be the modular function ∈ variant under this discrete group is generated by J(q)=q 1 + 196884q + . This existence was only one function (a Hauptmodul). The surprise was soon essentially (and nonconstructively) proved by that these coincide with the fifteen primes that di- Thompson, A. O. L. Atkin, P. Fong, and S. Smith, and the problem was to uncover the deeper story. James Lepowsky is professor of mathematics at Rutgers Griess [Gr] then proved the existence of the University, New Brunswick. His e-mail address is Monster by constructing it as an automorphism [email protected]. group of a remarkable new algebra of dimension Photographs used in this article are courtesy of ICM98. 196884. Later I. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky, and A. Meur- man gave a construction, incorporating a vertex op- Editor’s Note: The 1998 Fields Medalists are erator realization of the Griess algebra, of a “moon- Richard E. Borcherds, William Timothy Gowers, shine module” V \ for M whose McKay-Thompson Maxim Kontsevich, and Curtis T. McMullen. An ar- series for 1 M was indeed J(q). Only some, and ticle giving biographical information about the ∈ far from all, of the McKay-Thompson series for this medalists and a brief summary of the work of each structure V \ could be computed directly. This appears in the November 1998 Notices, pp. construction was reinterpreted by physicists, dur- 1158–1160. ing the resurgence of string theory in the mid- JANUARY 1999 NOTICES OF THE AMS 17 fields.qxp 11/13/98 11:22 AM Page 18 1980s, as a “toy model” physical the root multiplicities are exactly the coefficients theory of a 26-dimensional bosonic of certain automorphic forms. string compactified on a 24-dimen- Borcherds’s remarkable achievement concern- sional toral “orbifold” associated ing moonshine followed, in his strikingly original with the Leech lattice. Thus the Mon- proof [B3] that all of the McKay-Thompson series ster turned out to be the symmetry for V \ do in fact agree with the 194 series written group of an idealized physical the- down by Conway and Norton and in particular sat- ory. The term “vertex operator” isfy the genus-zero property; that is, the Conway- comes from the early days of string Norton conjecture holds for V \. His strategy was theory, when operators of this type to tensor V \ with a rank-two vertex algebra to were used to describe interactions form a rank-26 vertex algebra on which M acts at a “vertex”. Affine Lie algebras canonically, and he drew on a rich variety of ideas, were constructed via what turned among them ideas from vertex algebra theory, the out to be certain variants of physi- Richard E. Borcherds theory of Borcherds algebras (particularly his sin- cal vertex operators. gularly interesting “Monster Lie algebra”), string Then came a penetrating insight of Borcherds: theory (especially, critical 26-dimensional string He introduced his axiomatic notion of “vertex al- theory and the “no-ghost theorem” of R. C. Brower, gebra” [B1] and perceived among many other things P. Goddard, and C. Thorn), and modular function that the moonshine module could be endowed theory. He established a twisted denominator for- with an M-invariant vertex algebra structure. The mula for the Monster Lie algebra by exploiting the concept of vertex algebra is a mathematically pre- homology of a suitable subalgebra, and he con- cise algebraic counterpart of the concept of “chi- cluded that the series for V \ satisfy the “replica- ral algebra” in two-dimensional conformal quan- tion formulas” of Conway-Norton and thus, as a tum field theory as formalized by A. Belavin, result of a verification of initial data, agree with A. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov (a physical the Conway-Norton series. theory foundational in string theory and in two- The fact that the root multiplicities of the Mon- dimensional statistical mechanics). This funda- ster Lie algebra are the coefficients of J(q) and the mental notion reflects deep features of the tradi- relation of this fact to the denominator formula are tional notions of commutative associative algebra just the tip of an iceberg: When Borcherds pursued and at the same time of Lie algebra. A vertex op- this idea for a wide range of Borcherds algebras, erator algebra structure (a variant of vertex alge- he discovered a powerful and unexpected corre- bra structure) on V \ was given in [FLM] and allowed spondence between certain classical modular func- the possibility of characterizing V \, by a still-un- tions and meromorphic modular forms associated proved conjecture, as the unique vertex operator algebra satisfying a short list of natural condi- with arithmetic subgroups of SO(n, 2). The re- tions. The Fischer-Griess Monster, then, is the au- sulting infinite product expansions led to striking tomorphism group of a (conjecturally) unique new new results on moduli spaces of certain varieties. kind of mathematical object. The nonclassical fla- J. Harvey, G. Moore, Borcherds, and others have de- vor of the theory of vertex algebras in mathemat- veloped potentially far-reaching connections with ics can be thought of as analogous to the non- mirror symmetry and string duality. classical flavor of string theory in physics. Borcherds’s insights have influenced a wide range of works. For example, the value of having Borcherds was meanwhile developing his the- a conceptual notion of vertex (operator) algebra has ory of generalized Kac-Moody algebras [B2], now been immense. It becomes possible to formulate also called “Borcherds algebras”. Kac-Moody alge- new questions and to address new problems. Here bras form a very important class of Lie algebras generalizing the class of finite-dimensional semi- are some notable examples: the initiation of a pro- simple Lie algebras. Outside the fundamental class gram to construct (geometric) conformal field the- of affine Lie algebras, the infinite-dimensional Kac- ory using vertex operator algebras (I. Frenkel), so- Moody algebras have been notoriously difficult to lution of the problem of constructing “tree-level” construct concretely. Borcherds had the insight conformal field theory in the sense of G. Segal and to study systematically the phenomenon of “imag- M. Kontsevich (Y.-Z. Huang), a vertex-operator-al- inary simple roots”, and the resulting algebras en- gebra-theoretic proof of modular transformation compass a wide variety of striking examples whose properties of “characters” of modules (Y. Zhu), root multiplicities Borcherds determined com- and a natural approach to the construction of ver- pletely and which he in fact constructed directly tex (operator) algebras and their modules (devel- from suitable vertex algebras. He established what oped systematically by H. Li and others). are now called the “Weyl-Kac-Borcherds charac- The deepest mysteries of moonshine are still not ter” and “denominator formulas” for these alge- fully resolved. Some notable works in this direc- bras. Most importantly, he made the fundamental tion are Borcherds’s and A. Ryba’s investigation of discovery that for suitable families of examples, moonshine over finite fields and work of C. Dong, 18 NOTICES OF THE AMS VOLUME 46, NUMBER 1 fields.qxp 11/13/98 11:22 AM Page 19 H. Li, and G. Mason on Norton’s generalized moon- 1. Counterexamples to the main shine conjectures. open problems on the structure of Only part of Borcherds’s important work has infinite-dimensional Banach been touched on here. Discussions and treatments spaces. of many facets of his accomplishments and his It has become clear in recent ideas can be found in, for example, [FLM], [Ge], decades that there is a rich structure [JLW], [K], and Goddard’s and Borcherds’s talks at theory for Banach spaces of a high the International Congress [Go], [B4]. These works finite dimension, as exemplified by include listings of many of Borcherds’s papers. the theorem of A. Dvoretzky on the existence of almost Euclidean sec- References tions.
Recommended publications
  • TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual
    2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match.
    [Show full text]
  • A View from the Bridge Natalie Paquette
    INFERENCE / Vol. 3, No. 4 A View from the Bridge Natalie Paquette tring theory is a quantum theory of gravity.1 Albert example, supersymmetric theories require particles to Einstein’s theory of general relativity emerges natu- come in pairs. For every bosonic particle there is a fermi- rally from its equations.2 The result is consistent in onic superpartner. Sthe sense that its calculations do not diverge to infinity. Supersymmetric field theory has a disheartening String theory may well be the only consistent quantum impediment. Suppose that a supersymmetric quantum theory of gravity. If true, this would be a considerable field theory is defined on a generic curved manifold. The virtue. Whether it is true or not, string theory is indis- Euclidean metric of Newtonian physics and the Lorentz putably the source of profound ideas in mathematics.3 metric of special relativity are replaced by the manifold’s This is distinctly odd. A line of influence has always run own metric. Supercharges correspond to conserved Killing from mathematics to physics. When Einstein struggled spinors. Solutions to the Killing spinor equations are plen- to express general relativity, he found the tools that he tiful in a flat space, but the equations become extremely needed had been created sixty years before by Bernhard restrictive on curved manifolds. They are so restrictive Riemann. The example is typical. Mathematicians discov- that they have, in general, no solutions. Promoting a flat ered group theory long before physicists began using it. In supersymmetric field theory to a generic curved mani- the case of string theory, it is often the other way around.
    [Show full text]
  • John H. Conway
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 58, Number 3, July 2021, Pages 311–312 https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1702 Article electronically published on April 19, 2021 IN MEMORIAM: JOHN H. CONWAY MICHEL BROUE´ “Conway was arguably an extreme point in the convex hull of all mathematicians” wrote Terry Tao after John H. Conway died from COVID-19 on April 11, 2020. Emeritus professor at Princeton University, which he joined in 1986 after spending almost 20 years at Cambridge University (U.K.), Conway was 82 years old. “An extreme point. ”. Indeed, Conway has contributed to so many aspects of mathematics, including finite group theory, number theory, game theory, tiling, logic, knot theory, combinatorics, algorithmics. He also invented a profusion of games, such as “Phutball”. He said he was proud of “Surreal Numbers” (an enor- mous new world of numbers) and “Free Will Theorem” (a sort of mathematical formulation of the philosophical notion of free will, inspired by quantum mechan- ics). It seems he is most widely known (which he sometimes regretted) as the inventor of the “Game of Life”, the theory of cellular automata—indeed of deter- ministic behavior, quite unlike “Free Will Theorem”: “I have not become a world expert on one topic, I don’t do that. I am just interested in a lot of things,” said he. In 1970, I started my PhD under Claude Chevalley, who suggested that I should consult Jean-Pierre Serre for a good problem. Serre told me that a good start might consist in reading an interesting new paper and trying to understand it with my own ways; he said, “You might read the paper of Conway about the automorphisms group of the Leech lattice”.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION– CONSCIOUSNESS– REALITY How a New Understanding of the Universe Can Help Answer Age-Old Questions of Existence the FRONTIERS COLLECTION
    THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION James B. Glattfelder INFORMATION– CONSCIOUSNESS– REALITY How a New Understanding of the Universe Can Help Answer Age-Old Questions of Existence THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION Series editors Avshalom C. Elitzur, Iyar, Israel Institute of Advanced Research, Rehovot, Israel Zeeya Merali, Foundational Questions Institute, Decatur, GA, USA Thanu Padmanabhan, Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA), Pune, India Maximilian Schlosshauer, Department of Physics, University of Portland, Portland, OR, USA Mark P. Silverman, Department of Physics, Trinity College, Hartford, CT, USA Jack A. Tuszynski, Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Rüdiger Vaas, Redaktion Astronomie, Physik, bild der wissenschaft, Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany THE FRONTIERS COLLECTION The books in this collection are devoted to challenging and open problems at the forefront of modern science and scholarship, including related philosophical debates. In contrast to typical research monographs, however, they strive to present their topics in a manner accessible also to scientifically literate non-specialists wishing to gain insight into the deeper implications and fascinating questions involved. Taken as a whole, the series reflects the need for a fundamental and interdisciplinary approach to modern science and research. Furthermore, it is intended to encourage active academics in all fields to ponder over important and perhaps controversial issues beyond their own speciality. Extending from quantum physics and relativity to entropy, conscious- ness, language and complex systems—the Frontiers Collection will inspire readers to push back the frontiers of their own knowledge. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/5342 For a full list of published titles, please see back of book or springer.com/series/5342 James B.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Quantum Field Theory(QFT)
    Quantum Mechanics_quantum field theory(QFT) In theoretical physics, quantum field theory(QFT) is a theoretical framework for constructing quantum mechanical models of subatomic particles in particle physics and quasiparticles incondensed matter physics. A QFT treats particles as excited states of an underlying physical field, so these are called field quanta. For example, Quantum electrodynamics (QED) has one electron field and one photon field;Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) has one field for each type of quark; and, in condensed matter, there is an atomic displacement field that gives rise to phonon particles. Edward Witten describes QFT as "by far" the most difficult theory in modern physics.[1] In QFT, quantum mechanical interactions between particles are described by interaction terms between the corresponding underlying fields. QFT interaction terms are similar in spirit to those between charges with electric and magnetic fields in Maxwell's equations. However, unlike the classical fields of Maxwell's theory, fields in QFT generally exist in quantum superpositions of states and are subject to the laws of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical systems have a fixed number of particles, with each particle having a finite number of degrees of freedom. In contrast, the excited states of a QFT can represent any number of particles. This makes quantum field theories especially useful for describing systems where the particle count/number may change over time, a crucial feature of relativistic dynamics. Because the fields are continuous quantities over space, there exist excited states with arbitrarily large numbers of particles in them, providing QFT systems with an effectively infinite number of degrees of freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • EMS Newsletter No 38
    CONTENTS EDITORIAL TEAM EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY EDITOR-IN-CHIEF ROBIN WILSON Department of Pure Mathematics The Open University Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK e-mail: [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITORS STEEN MARKVORSEN Department of Mathematics Technical University of Denmark Building 303 NEWSLETTER No. 38 DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark e-mail: [email protected] December 2000 KRZYSZTOF CIESIELSKI Mathematics Institute Jagiellonian University EMS News: Reymonta 4 Agenda, Editorial, Edinburgh Summer School, London meeting .................. 3 30-059 Kraków, Poland e-mail: [email protected] KATHLEEN QUINN Joint AMS-Scandinavia Meeting ................................................................. 11 The Open University [address as above] e-mail: [email protected] The World Mathematical Year in Europe ................................................... 12 SPECIALIST EDITORS INTERVIEWS The Pre-history of the EMS ......................................................................... 14 Steen Markvorsen [address as above] SOCIETIES Krzysztof Ciesielski [address as above] Interview with Sir Roger Penrose ............................................................... 17 EDUCATION Vinicio Villani Interview with Vadim G. Vizing .................................................................. 22 Dipartimento di Matematica Via Bounarotti, 2 56127 Pisa, Italy 2000 Anniversaries: John Napier (1550-1617) ........................................... 24 e-mail: [email protected] MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS Societies: L’Unione Matematica
    [Show full text]
  • Les Lauréats De La Médaille Fields
    Les lauréats de la Médaille Fields LA Médaille Fields est un prix, moins connu que le prix Nobel et qui en est pourtant l'équivalent en mathématiques, dû à John Charles Fields (1863-1932). Depuis 1936 elle est attribuée lors du Congrès international de mathématiques organisé tous les quatre ans par l'Union mathématique internationale. La Médaille Fields n'est décernée - tous les quatre ans, à au plus quatre1 mathématiciens devant avoir moins de 40 ans. Parmi ces 44 médaillés, 8 sont français : Laurent Schwartz, Jean-Pierre Serre, Alexandre Grothendieck, René Thom, Alain Connes, Jean-Christophe Yoccoz, Pierre-Louis Lions, Laurent Lafforgue et Wendelin Werner (tous sauf Grothendieck 2 sont issus de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure). Liste des lauréats 3 : • 1936 : Lars Ahlfors (finlandais), Jesse Douglas (américain) • 1950 : Laurent Schwartz (français), Atle Selberg (norvégien) • 1954 : Kunihiko Kodaira (japonais), Jean-Pierre Serre (français) • 1958 : Klaus Roth (britannique), René Thom (français) • 1962 : Lars Hormander (suédois), John Milnor (américain) • 1966 : Michael Atiyah (anglais), Paul Cohen (américain), Alexandre Grothendieck (français), Stephen Smale (américain) • 1970 : Alan Baker (anglais), Heisuke Hironaka (japonais), Sergei Novikov (russe), John Griggs Thompson (américain) • 1974 : Enrico Bombieri (italien), David Mumford (américain) • 1978 : Pierre Deligne (belge), Charles Fefferman (américain), Gregory Margulis (russe), Daniel Quillen (américain) • 1982 : Alain Connes (français), William Thurston (américain), Shing-Tung Yau
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2008.01607V2 [Math.NT] 23 Feb 2021
    ELLIPTIC CURVES AND THOMPSON’S SPORADIC SIMPLE GROUP MARYAM KHAQAN ABSTRACT. We characterize all infinite-dimensional graded virtual modules for 3 Thompson’s sporadic simple group whose graded traces are weight 2 weakly holo- morphic modular forms satisfying certain special properties. We then use these mod- ules to detect the non-triviality of Mordell–Weil, Selmer, and Tate-Shafarevich groups of quadratic twists of certain elliptic curves. 1. INTRODUCTION In 1978, McKay and Thompson observed [Thompson 1979b] that the first few 1 coefficients of the normalized elliptic modular invariant J(τ) = q− + 196884q + 21493760q2+864299970q3+O(q4), a central object in the theory of modular forms, can be written as sums involving the first few dimensions of irreducible representations of the monster group M, e.g., 196884 = 2 11+ 2 1196883 · · 21493760 = 2 11+ 2 1196883 + 21296876 (1.1) · · 864299970 = 12 1+ 12 196883 + 21296876 + 842609326. · · This coincidence inspired Thompson’s conjecture [Thompson 1979a] that there is an infinite-dimensional M-module V = Vn whose graded dimension is J(τ) and n 1 whose McKay–Thompson series M≥− T (τ) := tr(g V )qn (1.2) g | n n 1 X≥− are distinguished functions on the upper half-plane. Conway and Norton [Conway and Norton 1979] explicitly described the relevant McKay-Thompson se- ries, and also christened this phenomenon “monstrous moonshine.” Their conjecture was proven by Borcherds [Borcherds 1992] (building on work by Frenkel, Lepowsky and Meurman [Frenkel et al. 1988]) in 1992. In the few decades since the first ob- arXiv:2008.01607v2 [math.NT] 23 Feb 2021 servations of McKay and Thompson, it has become clear that monstrous moonshine is just the first of a series of similar phenomena encompassing several finite groups and their counterparts in the world of modular forms.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Work of Igor Frenkel Introduction by Pavel Etingof Igor Frenkel Is One of the Leading Representation Theorists and Mathe- Matical Physicists of Our Time
    On the work of Igor Frenkel Introduction by Pavel Etingof Igor Frenkel is one of the leading representation theorists and mathe- matical physicists of our time. Inspired by the mathematical philosophy of Herman Weyl, who recognized the central role of representation the- ory in mathematics and its relevance to quantum physics, Frenkel made a number of foundational contributions at the juncture of these fields. A quintessential mathematical visionary and romantic, he has rarely fol- lowed the present day fashion. Instead, he has striven to get aheadof time and get a glimpse into the mathematics of the future – at least a decade, no less. In this, he has followed the example of I. M. Gelfand, whose approach to mathematics has always inspired him. He would often write several foundational papers in a subject, and then leave it for the future generations to be developed further. His ideas have sometimes been so bold and ambitious and so much ahead of their time that they would not be fully appreciated even by his students at the time of their formulation, and would produce a storm of activity only a few years later. And, of course, as a result, many of his ideas are still waiting for their time to go off. This text is a modest attempt by Igor’s students and colleagues of vari- ous generations to review his work, and to highlight how it has influenced in each case the development of the corresponding field in subsequent years. 1 Contributions of Igor Frenkel to the rep- resentation theory of affine Lie algebras by Alistair Savage and Anthony Licata Among infinite-dimensional Lie algebras, it is the theory of affine Lie algebras that is the richest and most well understood.
    [Show full text]
  • The SASTRA Ramanujan Prize — Its Origins and Its Winners
    Asia Pacific Mathematics Newsletter 1 The SastraThe SASTRA Ramanujan Ramanujan Prize — Its Prize Origins — Its Originsand Its Winnersand Its ∗Winners Krishnaswami Alladi Krishnaswami Alladi The SASTRA Ramanujan Prize is a $10,000 an- many events and programs were held regularly nual award given to mathematicians not exceed- in Ramanujan’s memory, including the grand ing the age of 32 for path-breaking contributions Ramanujan Centenary celebrations in December in areas influenced by the Indian mathemati- 1987, nothing was done for the renovation of this cal genius Srinivasa Ramanujan. The prize has historic home. One of the most significant devel- been unusually effective in recognizing extremely opments in the worldwide effort to preserve and gifted mathematicians at an early stage in their honor the legacy of Ramanujan is the purchase in careers, who have gone on to accomplish even 2003 of Ramanujan’s home in Kumbakonam by greater things in mathematics and be awarded SASTRA University to maintain it as a museum. prizes with hallowed traditions such as the Fields This purchase had far reaching consequences be- Medal. This is due to the enthusiastic support cause it led to the involvement of a university from leading mathematicians around the world in the preservation of Ramanujan’s legacy for and the calibre of the winners. The age limit of 32 posterity. is because Ramanujan lived only for 32 years, and The Shanmugha Arts, Science, Technology and in that brief life span made revolutionary contri- Research Academy (SASTRA), is a private uni- butions; so the challenge for the prize candidates versity in the town of Tanjore after which the is to show what they have achieved in that same district is named.
    [Show full text]
  • A Monster Tale: a Review on Borcherds' Proof of Monstrous Moonshine Conjecture
    A monster tale: a review on Borcherds’ proof of monstrous moonshine conjecture by Alan Gerardo Reyes Figueroa Instituto de Matem´atica Pura e Aplicada IMPA A monster tale: a review on Borcherds’ proof of monstrous moonshine conjecture by Alan Gerardo Reyes Figueroa Disserta¸c˜ao Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Mestre em Matem´atica Instituto de Matem´atica Pura e Aplicada IMPA Maio de 2010 A monster tale: a review on Borcherds’ proof of monstrous moonshine conjecture Alan Gerardo Reyes Figueroa Instituto de Matem´atica Pura e Aplicada APPROVED: 26.05.2010 Hossein Movasati, Ph.D. Henrique Bursztyn, Ph.D. Am´ılcar Pacheco, Ph.D. Fr´ed´eric Paugam, Ph.D. Advisor: Hossein Movasati, Ph.D. v Abstract The Monster M is the largest of the sporadic simple groups. In 1979 Conway and Norton published the remarkable paper ‘Monstrous Moonshine’ [38], proposing a completely unex- pected relationship between finite simple groups and modular functions, in which related the Monster to the theory of modular forms. Conway and Norton conjectured in this paper that there is a close connection between the conjugacy classes of the Monster and the action of certain subgroups of SL2(R) on the upper half plane H. This conjecture implies that extensive information on the representations of the Monster is contained in the classical picture describing the action of SL2(R) on the upper half plane. Monstrous Moonshine is the collection of questions (and few answers) that these observations had directly inspired. In 1988, the book ‘Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster’ [67] by Frenkel, Lepowsky and Meurman appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No
    NEWSLETTER No. 454 January 2016 LMS 150TH ANNIVERSARY Mathematics Festival at THE LONDON SCIENCE MUSEUM What's your Angle? Uncovering Maths See report on page 3 SOCIETY MEETINGS AND EVENTS • 26 February: Mary Cartwright Lecture, London page 12 • 21 July: Society Meeting at the 7ECM, Berlin • 21 March: Society Meeting at the BMC, Bristol page 21 • 11 November: Graduate Student Meeting, London • 21–25 March: LMS Invited Lectures, Loughborough • 11 November: Annual General Meeting, London • 8 July: Graduate Student Meeting, London • 20 December: South West & South Wales Regional • 8 July: Society Meeting, London Meeting, Bath NEWSLETTER ONLINE: newsletter.lms.ac.uk @LondMathSoc LMS NEWSLETTER http://newsletter.lms.ac.uk Contents No. 454 January 2016 22 32 150th Anniversary Events Heidelberg Laureate Forum..................41 Departmental Celebrations....................18 Integrable Systems..................................45 What's Your Angle? Uncovering Maths...3 Mathematics Emerging..........................44 Awards Modern Topics in Nonlinear PDE and Geometric Analysis...............................31 2 Christopher Zeeman Medal 2016...........13 Singularities and Applications...............43 Louis Bachelier Prize 2016........................39 Why be Noncommutative?.....................44 LMS Honorary Membership.....................7 ICME-13 Bursaries....................................19 News Ramanujan Prize 2016............................37 European News.......................................25 Royal Society Medals and Awards 2016...37
    [Show full text]