Calendar of AMS Meetings and Conferences
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
JUNE 2017 - Vol
Knob Hill United Church, 23 Gage Avenue, Scarborough, ON, M1J 1T3 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] www.khuc.org Minister: Rev. Hannah Lee, 416.431.5054 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Dear Friends, Welcome. You have probably read this word on our church bulletin, projected on our sanctuary wall, or on a church sign next to the road. What does it mean to be a welcoming community? There was a time when the church followed a process of welcome based on “Behaving, Believing, Belonging.” Christians were told you had to behave a certain way, believe a set of doctrines, and then they were allowed to belong to the church community. According to this model, belonging is dependent on behaving and believing in line with what is deemed acceptable by the community. Is this truly welcoming in God’s eyes? Or are we distorting our understanding of God and God’s grace? Jesus calls his disciples – and us today – to welcome all. We are all agents in giving and receiving welcome. The process of welcome we at KHUC are striving to do is “Belonging, Believing, Becoming.” God welcomes us and we in turn welcome one another, especially those who are marginalized, or considered the least and the lost. This model of welcome allows people to come as they are. It allows people to be honest and vulnerable. It leaves room for grace. It acknowledges that we are not perfect, but God is. It doesn’t matter who you are, what you’ve done, how you believe – it doesn’t even matter if you are Christian. -
On the Uniqueness of Gibbs States in the Pirogov-Sinai Theory?
Commun. Math. Phys. 189, 311 – 321 (1997) Communications in Mathematical Physics c Springer-Verlag 1997 On the Uniqueness of Gibbs States in the Pirogov-Sinai Theory? J.L. Lebowitz1, A.E. Mazel2 1 Department of Mathematics and Physics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA 2 International Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 113556, Russia Received: 4 June 1996 / Accepted: 30 October 1996 Dedicated to the memory of Roland Dobrushin Abstract: We prove that, for low-temperature systems considered in the Pirogov-Sinai theory, uniqueness in the class of translation-periodic Gibbs states implies global unique- ness, i.e. the absence of any non-periodic Gibbs state. The approach to this infinite volume state is exponentially fast. 1. Introduction The problem of uniqueness of Gibbs states was one of R.L.Dobrushin’s favorite subjects in which he obtained many classical results. In particular when two or more translati- on-periodic states coexist, it is natural to ask whether there might also exist other, non translation-periodic, Gibbs states, which approach asymptotically, in different spatial directions, the translation periodic ones. The affirmative answer to this question was given by R.L.Dobrushin with his famous construction of such states for the Ising model, using boundary conditions, in three and higher dimensions [D]. Here we consider the opposite± situation: we will prove that in the regions of the low-temperature phase diagram where there is a unique translation-periodic Gibbs state one actually has global uniqueness of the limit Gibbs state. Moreover we show that, uniformly in boundary conditions, the finite volume probability of any local event tends to its infinite volume limit value exponentially fast in the diameter of the domain. -
The Ninety-Seventh Commencement Asbury Theological Seminary
The Ninety-Seventh Commencement asbury theological seminary Saturday, November 14, 2020 THE NINETY-SEVENTH COMMEncEMENT NOVEMBER 14, 2020 ASBURY THEOLOGIcaL SEMInaRY THE PRESIDENT’S CABINET President TIMOTHY C. TENNENT, PH.D. Provost and Vice President of Academic Affairs DOUGLAS K. MattHEWS, PH.D. Associate Provost and Vice President of Enrollment Management and Student Services KEVIN BISH, M.ED. Vice President of Advancement JAY E. MANSUR, C.F.S. Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer BRYAN P. BLANKENSHIP, M.B.A. Vice President of Formation DOnna COVINGTON, M.A.C.L. Vice President of Seedbed JOHN DAVID WALT, J.D. Associate Vice President of the Florida Dunnam Campus R. STEPHEN GOBER, D.MIN. Associate Vice President of Enrollment Management and Operations of the Florida Dunnam Campus ERIC CURRIE, M.DIV. AcaDEMIC OFFICERS Associate Provost Dean of Advanced Research Programs CHRIstINE L. JOHNSON, PH.D. LALsanGKIMA PacHUAU, PH.D. Dean of the Beeson School of Practical Theology Dean of the School of Theology and Formation THOMAS F. TUMBLIN, PH.D. JAMES R. THOBABEN, PH.D. Associate Provost and Dean of the Assistant Provost of Institutional Evaluation, Orlando School of Ministry Assessment and Academic Administration BRIAN D. RUSSELL, PH.D. S. BRIAN YEICH, PH.D. Dean of the School of Biblical Interpretation Dean of Library, Information, DAVID R. BAUER, PH.D. and Technology Services PAUL A. TIPPEY, PH.D. Dean of the E. Stanley Jones School of World Mission and Evangelism GREGG A. OKESSON, PH.D. THE NINETY-SEVENTH COMMEncEMENT Saturday, The Fourteenth of November Two Thousand Twenty Eleven o’clock in the morning PRESIDENT TIMOTHY C. -
Of 23 Case No: 19-L-0846 CIRCUIT COURT for the 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY of ST. CLAIR, STATE of ILLINOIS LISA MOORE
Electronically Filed Kahalah A. Clay Circuit Clerk CARMEN GLENN 19L0846 St. Clair County CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 20TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 6/22/2020 10:42 AM COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR, STATE OF ILLINOIS 9555049 LISA MOORE, individually and on behalf of ) all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) No. 19-L-0846 ) KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF Plaintiff Lisa Moore (“Plaintiff”), by and through Class Counsel,1 respectfully submits this memorandum in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. The Settlement Agreement (hereafter, “Settlement”) and its exhibits are attached as Exhibit 1 to the concurrently filed Declaration of Scott A. Bursor In Support Of Plaintiff’s Application For Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, And Class Service Awards (“Bursor Decl.”). On April 21, 2020, this Court granted preliminary approval to the parties’ Settlement Agreement and ordered that the Settlement Administrator execute the approved Notice Plan. See Order Granting Preliminarily Approval of Class Action Settlement. The tremendous response from Class Members confirms that the Settlement is fair and reasonable and provides outstanding relief to the Class. Although the claims deadline is not until August 18, 2020, the Claims Administrator estimates that upon receipt of 228,311 Claims, the entire $7,000,000 Benefit Fund will be exhausted. See Exhibit MFA1, the June 22, 2020 Decl. of Jeanne C. 1 All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same definitions as set out in the Settlement Agreement. Page 1 of 23 Case No: 19-L-0846 Finegan (“Finegan Decl.”) ¶ 31. -
The Problem of Distributed Consensus: a Survey Stephen Wolfram*
The Problem of Distributed Consensus: A Survey Stephen Wolfram* A survey is given of approaches to the problem of distributed consensus, focusing particularly on methods based on cellular automata and related systems. A variety of new results are given, as well as a history of the field and an extensive bibliography. Distributed consensus is of current relevance in a new generation of blockchain-related systems. In preparation for a conference entitled “Distributed Consensus with Cellular Automata and Related Systems” that we’re organizing with NKN (= “New Kind of Network”) I decided to explore the problem of distributed consensus using methods from A New Kind of Science (yes, NKN “rhymes” with NKS) as well as from the Wolfram Physics Project. A Simple Example Consider a collection of “nodes”, each one of two possible colors. We want to determine the majority or “consensus” color of the nodes, i.e. which color is the more common among the nodes. A version of this document with immediately executable code is available at writings.stephenwolfram.com/2021/05/the-problem-of-distributed-consensus Originally published May 17, 2021 *Email: [email protected] 2 | Stephen Wolfram One obvious method to find this “majority” color is just sequentially to visit each node, and tally up all the colors. But it’s potentially much more efficient if we can use a distributed algorithm, where we’re running computations in parallel across the various nodes. One possible algorithm works as follows. First connect each node to some number of neighbors. For now, we’ll just pick the neighbors according to the spatial layout of the nodes: The algorithm works in a sequence of steps, at each step updating the color of each node to be whatever the “majority color” of its neighbors is. -
2021 Nba Pinnacle Award Winners - Radio
2021 NBA PINNACLE AWARD WINNERS - RADIO SERVICE TO COMMUNITY Gold KFOR Lincoln Lincoln is a Great Place to Have a Heart Attack Silver KRVN Lexington SCC Ag Club Fundraising Goal Bronze KROR Grand Island Light A Hero's Home SERVICE TO CHILDREN Gold KGOR Omaha Lisa Seeman Interview Silver KFOR Lincoln All Means All - LPS Buses Homeless Children Bronze KNEB Scottsbluff 4-H Spotlight: Show Pigs SERVICE TO BUSINESS, INDUSTRY, GOVERNMENT OR EDUCATION Gold KGOR Omaha Spend Local Silver KEZO Omaha New Year, New Career Bronze KIOS Omaha "Leta of Lincoln" Goes Viral SERVICE TO AGRICULTURE Gold KRVN Lexington Keeping Agriculture Safe During COVID-19 Silver KTIC AM West Point Friday Feeders Bronze KTIC AM West Point Potential Groundwater Management Area BEST SPOT NEWS REPORTING Gold KLIN Lincoln Madsen's Saga Escalates Silver KBRY Broken Bow Accountant Accused of Stealing Thousands Bronze KHAS Hastings HPS Returns to Classroom Learning BEST IN-DEPTH OR INVESTIGATIVE STORY OR SERIES Gold KODY-KXNP-KHAQ North Platte Local Leaders Respond to Proposed Meat Packing Plant Silver Nebraska Public Media Lincoln Remote Learning in Remote Nebraska Bronze KIOS Omaha Portrait of a Pandemic BEST CONTINUING COVERAGE OF A NEWS STORY Gold KFAB Omaha James Scurlock - Don Kleine Silver KFAB Omaha 11-Worth Café: Mayor Stothert & Chief Schmaderer Bronze KNEB Scottsbluff Local Processing Act BEST USE OF MULTIMEDIA JOURNALISM Gold KUVR Holdrege Holdrege Deep Freeze and Power Outage Silver Nebraska Public Media Lincoln A Wilbur Man is Running for President…Again Bronze -
TRINITY COLLEGE Cambridge Trinity College Cambridge College Trinity Annual Record Annual
2016 TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge trinity college cambridge annual record annual record 2016 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2015–2016 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Contents 5 Editorial 11 Commemoration 12 Chapel Address 15 The Health of the College 18 The Master’s Response on Behalf of the College 25 Alumni Relations & Development 26 Alumni Relations and Associations 37 Dining Privileges 38 Annual Gatherings 39 Alumni Achievements CONTENTS 44 Donations to the College Library 47 College Activities 48 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 53 Field Clubs 71 Students’ Union and Societies 80 College Choir 83 Features 84 Hermes 86 Inside a Pirate’s Cookbook 93 “… Through a Glass Darkly…” 102 Robert Smith, John Harrison, and a College Clock 109 ‘We need to talk about Erskine’ 117 My time as advisor to the BBC’s War and Peace TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 3 123 Fellows, Staff, and Students 124 The Master and Fellows 139 Appointments and Distinctions 141 In Memoriam 155 A Ninetieth Birthday Speech 158 An Eightieth Birthday Speech 167 College Notes 181 The Register 182 In Memoriam 186 Addresses wanted CONTENTS TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2016 | 4 Editorial It is with some trepidation that I step into Boyd Hilton’s shoes and take on the editorship of this journal. He managed the transition to ‘glossy’ with flair and panache. As historian of the College and sometime holder of many of its working offices, he also brought a knowledge of its past and an understanding of its mysteries that I am unable to match. -
Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology
Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology Clay Mathematics Proceedings Volume 5 Floer Homology, Gauge Theory, and Low-Dimensional Topology Proceedings of the Clay Mathematics Institute 2004 Summer School Alfréd Rényi Institute of Mathematics Budapest, Hungary June 5–26, 2004 David A. Ellwood Peter S. Ozsváth András I. Stipsicz Zoltán Szabó Editors American Mathematical Society Clay Mathematics Institute 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 57R17, 57R55, 57R57, 57R58, 53D05, 53D40, 57M27, 14J26. The cover illustrates a Kinoshita-Terasaka knot (a knot with trivial Alexander polyno- mial), and two Kauffman states. These states represent the two generators of the Heegaard Floer homology of the knot in its topmost filtration level. The fact that these elements are homologically non-trivial can be used to show that the Seifert genus of this knot is two, a result first proved by David Gabai. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Clay Mathematics Institute. Summer School (2004 : Budapest, Hungary) Floer homology, gauge theory, and low-dimensional topology : proceedings of the Clay Mathe- matics Institute 2004 Summer School, Alfr´ed R´enyi Institute of Mathematics, Budapest, Hungary, June 5–26, 2004 / David A. Ellwood ...[et al.], editors. p. cm. — (Clay mathematics proceedings, ISSN 1534-6455 ; v. 5) ISBN 0-8218-3845-8 (alk. paper) 1. Low-dimensional topology—Congresses. 2. Symplectic geometry—Congresses. 3. Homol- ogy theory—Congresses. 4. Gauge fields (Physics)—Congresses. I. Ellwood, D. (David), 1966– II. Title. III. Series. QA612.14.C55 2004 514.22—dc22 2006042815 Copying and reprinting. Material in this book may be reproduced by any means for educa- tional and scientific purposes without fee or permission with the exception of reproduction by ser- vices that collect fees for delivery of documents and provided that the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. -
Obituary Roland Lvovich Dobrushin, 1929 – 1995
Obituary Roland Lvovich Dobrushin, 1929 ± 1995 Roland Lvovich Dobrushin, an outstanding scientist in the domain of probability theory, information theory and mathematical physics, died of cancer in Moscow, on November 12, 1995, at the age of 66. Dobrushin's premature decease is a tremendous loss to Russian and world science. Dobrushin was born on July 20, 1929 in Leningrad (St.-Petersburg). In early childhood he lost his father; his mother died when he was still a schoolboy. In 1936, after his father's death, the family moved to Moscow. In 1947, on leaving school, Dobrushin entered the Mechanico-Mathematical Department of Moscow Univer- sity and after graduating from it did postgraduate studies. Then, from 1955 to 1965, he worked at the Proba- bility Theory Section of the Mechanico-Mathematical Department of Moscow University, and since 1967 until his demise was Head of the Multicomponent Random Systems Laboratory, within the Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (the Academy of Sciences of the USSR). Since 1967 Dobrushin was a Professor in the Electromagnetic Waves Section of the Moscow Physics Technologies Institute and since 1991 he was a Professor in the Probability Theory Section at Moscow University as well. In 1955 Dobrushin presented his candidate's thesis, and in 1962 he took his Doctor's degree. Even as a schoolboy Dobrushin conceived an interest in mathematics and participated in school mathemat- ical contests where he won a number of prizes. While at the University Dobrushin was an active member of E.B. Dynkin's seminar 1 . On A.N. -
Commentary on Thurston's Work on Foliations
COMMENTARY ON FOLIATIONS* Quoting Thurston's definition of foliation [F11]. \Given a large supply of some sort of fabric, what kinds of manifolds can be made from it, in a way that the patterns match up along the seams? This is a very general question, which has been studied by diverse means in differential topology and differential geometry. ... A foliation is a manifold made out of striped fabric - with infintely thin stripes, having no space between them. The complete stripes, or leaves, of the foliation are submanifolds; if the leaves have codimension k, the foliation is called a codimension k foliation. In order that a manifold admit a codimension- k foliation, it must have a plane field of dimension (n − k)." Such a foliation is called an (n − k)-dimensional foliation. The first definitive result in the subject, the so called Frobenius integrability theorem [Fr], concerns a necessary and sufficient condition for a plane field to be the tangent field of a foliation. See [Spi] Chapter 6 for a modern treatment. As Frobenius himself notes [Sa], a first proof was given by Deahna [De]. While this work was published in 1840, it took another hundred years before a geometric/topological theory of foliations was introduced. This was pioneered by Ehresmann and Reeb in a series of Comptes Rendus papers starting with [ER] that was quickly followed by Reeb's foundational 1948 thesis [Re1]. See Haefliger [Ha4] for a detailed account of developments in this period. Reeb [Re1] himself notes that the 1-dimensional theory had already undergone considerable development through the work of Poincare [P], Bendixson [Be], Kaplan [Ka] and others. -
Classification of 3-Manifolds with Certain Spines*1 )
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 205, 1975 CLASSIFICATIONOF 3-MANIFOLDSWITH CERTAIN SPINES*1 ) BY RICHARD S. STEVENS ABSTRACT. Given the group presentation <p= (a, b\ambn, apbq) With m, n, p, q & 0, we construct the corresponding 2-complex Ky. We prove the following theorems. THEOREM 7. Jf isa spine of a closed orientable 3-manifold if and only if (i) \m\ = \p\ = 1 or \n\ = \q\ = 1, or (") (m, p) = (n, q) = 1. Further, if (ii) holds but (i) does not, then the manifold is unique. THEOREM 10. If M is a closed orientable 3-manifold having K^ as a spine and \ = \mq — np\ then M is a lens space L\ % where (\,fc) = 1 except when X = 0 in which case M = S2 X S1. It is well known that every connected compact orientable 3-manifold with or without boundary has a spine that is a 2-complex with a single vertex. Such 2-complexes correspond very naturally to group presentations, the 1-cells corre- sponding to generators and the 2-cells corresponding to relators. In the case of a closed orientable 3-manifold, there are equally many 1-cells and 2-cells in the spine, i.e., equally many generators and relators in the corresponding presentation. Given a group presentation one is motivated to ask the following questions: (1) Is the corresponding 2-complex a spine of a compact orientable 3-manifold? (2) If there are equally many generators and relators, is the 2-complex a spine of a closed orientable 3-manifold? (3) Can we say what manifold(s) have the 2-complex as a spine? L. -
A View from the Bridge Natalie Paquette
INFERENCE / Vol. 3, No. 4 A View from the Bridge Natalie Paquette tring theory is a quantum theory of gravity.1 Albert example, supersymmetric theories require particles to Einstein’s theory of general relativity emerges natu- come in pairs. For every bosonic particle there is a fermi- rally from its equations.2 The result is consistent in onic superpartner. Sthe sense that its calculations do not diverge to infinity. Supersymmetric field theory has a disheartening String theory may well be the only consistent quantum impediment. Suppose that a supersymmetric quantum theory of gravity. If true, this would be a considerable field theory is defined on a generic curved manifold. The virtue. Whether it is true or not, string theory is indis- Euclidean metric of Newtonian physics and the Lorentz putably the source of profound ideas in mathematics.3 metric of special relativity are replaced by the manifold’s This is distinctly odd. A line of influence has always run own metric. Supercharges correspond to conserved Killing from mathematics to physics. When Einstein struggled spinors. Solutions to the Killing spinor equations are plen- to express general relativity, he found the tools that he tiful in a flat space, but the equations become extremely needed had been created sixty years before by Bernhard restrictive on curved manifolds. They are so restrictive Riemann. The example is typical. Mathematicians discov- that they have, in general, no solutions. Promoting a flat ered group theory long before physicists began using it. In supersymmetric field theory to a generic curved mani- the case of string theory, it is often the other way around.