Hai Loµi C¸ Míi Thuéc Gièng Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes) Ë Viöt Nam

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hai Loµi C¸ Míi Thuéc Gièng Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes) Ë Viöt Nam 28(2): 17-20 T¹p chÝ Sinh häc 6-2006 Hai loµi c¸ míi thuéc gièng Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes) ë ViÖt Nam D−¬ng Quang Ngäc ViÖn ChiÕn l−îc vµ Ch−¬ng tr×nh gi¸o dôc NguyÔn H÷u Dùc, TrÇn §øc HËu, T¹ ThÞ Thuû Tr−êng ®¹i häc S− ph¹m Hµ Néi Gièng c¸ dÇu Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 Hãa) vµ s«ng NhËt LÖ (tØnh Qu¶ng B×nh) trong cho ®Õn tr−íc c«ng bè nµy cã 4 loµi ph©n bè ë c¸c n¨m 2003-2005, chóng t«i ®· ph¸t hiÖn Trung Quèc vµ miÒn B¾c ViÖt Nam. Trong c¸c thªm 2 loµi míi cho khoa häc, n©ng tæng sè loµi ®ît ®iÒu tra thùc ®Þa t¹i s«ng M· (tØnh Thanh thuéc gièng nµy lªn 6 loµi. I. Kho¸ ®Þnh lo¹i c¸c loµi thuéc gièng Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 1(4) L−îc mang cung mang 1 d−íi 20. 2(3) V¶y ®−êng bªn 42-43 c¸i. L−îc mang cung mang I: 15 c¸i ...………..…….... 1. T.hotayensis 3(2) V¶y ®−êng bªn 51 c¸i. L−îc mang cung mang I: 12-15 c¸i…………..……… 2. T. hoffmani 4(1) L−îc mang cung mang I trªn 20 c¸i 5(8) L−îc mang cung mang I 35 c¸i trë xuèng 6(7) §−êng bªn 60-62 v¶y ……………………………………...………………… 3. T. swinhonis 7(6) §−êng bªn 42-43 v¶y ……………………………………...………………. .4. T. nhatleensis 8(5) L−îc mang cung mang I trªn 35 c¸i 9(10) V¶y ®−êng bªn 52-56 v¶y; l−îc mang cung mang I: 36-39 …………………... 5. T.houdmeri 10(9) V¶y ®−êng bªn 47-50 c¸i; l−îc mang cung mang I: 45-50 c¸i ………….……... 6. T. maensis II. M« t¶ hai loµi míi thuéc gièng Tªn ®Þa ph−¬ng : c¸ dÇu Toxabramis Gunther, 1873 M« t¶ : Lo = 68-82 mm; D = II, 7; A = 3, 16- 1. Toxabramis maensis D. H. Nguyen & N. 17; P = 1, 11-12; V = 1, 7-8; P = 4,5-7,8 g. Q. Duong sp.nov. - C¸ dÇu hå s«ng M· L−îc mang cung mang I: 45-50. R¨ng hÇu 2 (h×nh 1) hµng: 4,2-2,4. R¨ng gai cña v©y l−ng: 18-20 ®«i. VÈy däc c¸n ®u«i: 8. VÈy quanh c¸n ®u«i: 18. - Holotyp: c¸ thÓ c¸i; L o = 72 mm thu t¹i Quan Hãa, Thanh Hãa ngµy 18-10-2003, trªn = 8 l−u vùc s«ng M·. Ll 47 50 . 11 −V - Paratyp: 6 mÉu vËt: 3 mÉu vËt thu t¹i Quan 2 Hãa cïng víi holotyp; 3 mÉu vËt thu t¹i ThiÖu Lo = 3,64-4,12; H = 4,25-4,43; T = 7,8-8,5; Hãa, Thanh Hãa ngµy 15-06-2004, ®Òu trªn l−u lcd = 8,2-8,5 ccd. vùc s«ng M·. T = 3,75-4,0; Ot = 3,64-4,0; O = 3,64-4,0 OO; - C¸c mÉu vËt ®−îc l−u gi÷ t¹i Khoa Sinh- T = 2,0-2,15 Op; lcd = 1-1,05 ccd; OO = 1,0 O. Kü thuËt n«ng nghiÖp, Tr−êng ®¹i häc S− ph¹m Hµ Néi. Lcmax = 3-3,35 Lcmin; hD = 1,86-2,13 lD. 17 Kho¶ng c¸ch tr−íc khëi ®iÓm cña v©y l−ng kh«ng nhän l¾m. MiÖng nhá, r¹ch xiªn lªn trªn. = 1,09-1,13 kho¶ng c¸ch sau khëi ®iÓm cña v©y Khi ngËm miÖng, x−¬ng hµm d−íi dµi h¬n l−ng. x−¬ng hµm trªn. M«i máng. Kh«ng cã r©u. M¾t Th©n c¸ dµi, dÑp bªn, m×nh máng, l−ng lín; ®−êng kÝnh cña m¾t t−¬ng ®−¬ng chiÒu dµi th¼ng. L−ên bông hoµn toµn tõ ngùc tíi hËu cña mâm vµ b»ng víi kho¶ng c¸ch gi÷a hai æ m«n. ViÒn bông cong, thÊp. §Çu bÐ. Mâm m¾t. L−îc mang dµi, nhá, xÕp xÝt nhau. H×nh 1. C¸ dÇu hå s«ng M· Toxabramis maensis sp.nov. B¶ng 1 So s¸nh mét sè ®Æc ®iÓm cña c¸c loµi trong gièng Toxabramis Gunther , 1873 T. T. T. T. T. T. swinhonis houdmeri hotayensis hoffmani maensis nhatleensis 1 1 9−10 8 7 8 7 2 47 50 2 Ll 60 62 52-56 42 43 51 1 − 39 41 − − 1 1 −V 1 V 1 1 −V 2 1 2 V 2 2 2 L−îc mang cung 27-28 36-39 15 12-15 45-50 27-35 mang I R¨ng gai cña v©y 16-18 18-20 11-13 l−ng Säc ®en däc th©n Kh«ng cã Kh«ng cã Cã ? Cã Cã Khëi ®iÓm cña v©y l−ng sau khëi ®iÓm cña trªn x−¬ng n¾p mang ®i xiªn xuèng phÝa d−íi v©y bông vµ gÇn gèc v©y ®u«i h¬n tíi mâm. Tia kho¶ng 10-11 vÈy hay kho¶ng gi÷a v©y ngùc vµ ®¬n cuèi cña v©y l−ng lµ gai cøng hãa x−¬ng, xÎ v©y bông th× ®i ngang theo mÐp bông vµ qua r·nh vµ phÝa sau cã 18-20 ®«i r¨ng c−a; cµng ë mót cuèi cña tia v©y hËu m«n råi ®i lªn vµo gi÷a gÇn gèc gai v©y l−ng th× r¨ng c−a cµng ng¾n. cuèng ®u«i. Khëi ®iÓm cña v©y bông ë gi÷a hoÆc gÇn mót C¸ cã mµu x¸m b¹c. ViÒn l−ng tõ mâm tíi mâm h¬n tíi gèc v©y ®u«i. V©y ngùc dµi gÇn tíi ®u«i cã nhiÒu chÊm ®en nhá, n»m r¶i r¸c vµ gèc v©y bông. V©y bông ch−a tíi hËu m«n. V©y ®−îc giíi h¹n bëi mét d¶i xanh ®en ch¹y däc hËu m«n ch−a tíi v©y ®u«i. V©y ®u«i ph©n thïy gi÷a th©n. D¶i xanh ®en chiÕm kho¶ng 2-3 hµng s©u; thïy d−íi dµi h¬n thïy trªn. HËu m«n ngay vÈy, ®Ëm dÇn tõ sau n¾p mang ®Õn hÕt gèc v©y tr−íc v©y hËu m«n. §èt sèng toµn th©n: 39-40. ®u«i. ViÒn mÐp cña v©y ®u«i cã mµu x¸m ®en, Bãng h¬i hai ng¨n, ng¨n sau dµi gÊp 1,29-1,35 do c¸c chÊm ®en t¹o nªn. lÇn ng¨n tr−íc. VÈy trßn, rÊt máng, dÔ rông. §−êng bªn NhËn xÐt : loµi c¸ dÇu hå s«ng M· hoµn toµn. Khëi ®iÓm cña ®−êng bªn ®i tõ phÝa Toxabramis maensis sp.nov. gÇn víi c¸c loµi T. 18 hotayensis Hao, 2001, T. houdmeri Pellegrin, Tªn ®Þa ph−¬ng : c¸ dÇu. 1932 vµ T. nhatleensis sp.nov . nh−ng cã nh÷ng M« t¶ : Lo = 56-72 mm; D = II,7; A = 3,14- sai kh¸c so víi c¸c loµi trªn (b¶ng 1): sè l−îng 16; P = 1,12; V= 1,8; P = 3,8-4,6 g. l−îc mang cung mang I nhiÒu h¬n so víi tÊt c¶ c¸c loµi trong gièng; sè v¶y cña ®−êng bªn L−îc mang cung mang I: 27-35; r¨ng hÇu 2 nhiÒu h¬n so víi c¸c loµi T. hotayensis vµ T. hµng: 2,4-4,2; r¨ng gai cña v©y l−ng: 11-13 ®«i. nhatleensis ; sè l−îng r¨ng gai cña v©y l−ng VÈy däc c¸n ®u«i: 10-13. VÈy quanh c¸n ®u«i: 18. nhiÒu h¬n so víi loµi T. nhatleensis. 7 1 Ll = 39 2 41. 2. Toxabramis nhatleensis H. D. Nguyen, D. 1 1 −V H. Tran & T. T Ta sp.nov. - C¸ dÇu hå 2 s«ng NhËt LÖ (h×nh 2) Lo = 3,37-4,2; H = 3,8-4,2; T = 5,6-6,6 lcd = 8,7-9,8 ccd. - Holotyp: c¸ thÓ c¸i; L o = 58 mm thu t¹i LÖ Thñy, Qu¶ng B×nh ngµy 30-04-2004. T = 3,5-5,25Ot = 3,5-4,25O = 3,5-4,25O; T = 1,75-2,14Op; lcd = 1,375-1,67 ccd; OO = 1,0 O. - Paratyp: 7 mÉu vËt, cïng thu t¹i LÖ Thñy víi holotyp, ®Òu trªn l−u vùc s«ng NhËt LÖ. Lcmax = 2,5-2,8 Lcmin; hD = 1,5-1,67 lD. - C¸c mÉu vËt ®−îc l−u gi÷ t¹i Khoa Sinh- Kho¶ng c¸ch tr−íc khëi ®iÓm cña v©y l−ng Kü thuËt n«ng nghiÖp, Tr−êng ®¹i häc S− ph¹m = 1,07-1,185 kho¶ng c¸ch sau khëi ®iÓm cña Hµ Néi. v©y l−ng. H×nh 2. C¸ dÇu hå s«ng NhËt LÖ Toxabramis nhatleensis sp.nov. Th©n c¸ dµi, dÑp máng, l−ng t−¬ng ®èi th¼ng. m«n. §èt sèng toµn th©n: 42. Bãng h¬i hai ng¨n, L−ên bông hoµn toµn tõ sau eo mang ®Õn hËu ng¨n sau dµi gÊp 1,17-1,27 lÇn ng¨n tr−íc.
Recommended publications
  • Fish and Fisheries in the Sesan River Basin: Catchment Baseline, Fisheries Section
    Fish and fisheries in the Sesan River Basin: catchment baseline, fisheries section Item Type monograph Authors Baran, E.; Samadee, S.; Teoh, S.J.; Tran, T.C. Publisher The WorldFish Center Download date 26/09/2021 18:39:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/25381 WATER AND FOOD CHALLENGE PROGRAM IN THE MEKONG Optimizing the management of a cascade of reservoirs at the catchment level MK3 FISH AND FISHERIES IN THE SESAN RIVER BASIN MK3 catchment baseline‐ fisheries section Eric BARAN1, SARAY Samadee1, TEOH Shwu Jiau2, TRAN Thanh Cong3 1 WorldFish Center, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 2 WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia. 3 ICEM, Hanoi, Vietnam December 2011 “Information on fish stocks, biodiversity, capture fisheries and aquaculture is inadequate and needs further research in order to make qualified assessments.” WorldBank 2006 Options for integrated development and management of the Se San–Sre Pok–Se Kong sub‐basins 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 5 2 SESAN RIVER ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Hydrology of the Sesan River .............................................................................................. 7 2.2 Ecological zones in the Sesan river ..................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Methodology ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomical Notes on Selected Freshwater Fish Species Described
    Zoological Research 35 (2): 142−159 DOI:10.11813/j.issn.0254-5853.2014.2.142 Taxonomical notes on selected freshwater fish species described from northern and central Vietnam (Cypriniformes: Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Cyprinidae, Nemacheilidae; Perciformes: Channidae, Osphronemidae; Synbranchiformes: Mastacembelidae) Marco Endruweit* Qingshan Road 601, Qingdao, China Abstract: Selected, little known taxa of northern and central Vietnamese freshwater fish species are reviewed. Nomenclatural acts are taken: Hemibarbus lehoai is placed in synonymy of H. maculatus, Paracobitis hagiangensis in synonymy of Schistura caudofurca. A neotype of Micronemacheilus bacmeensis is assigned. The name Channa hanamensis is treated as a nomen nudum. Two labeonine species described from China are nomenclaturally affected: Garra findolabium is transferred to Vinagarra and its specific epithet is treated as a noun in apposition; the specific epithet of Sinigarra napoense is corrected to napoensis. Keywords: New species; Ichthyology; Taxonomy; Nomenclature; Vietnam The ichthyofauna of Vietnam can be well separated (2005a, 2005b) in chronological order.1Mai (1978) and into a northern and a southern biome. Geographically, Kottelat (2001b) are comparable, since they exclusively these biomes are split by central Vietnam's massive Ann- deal with northern Vietnamese freshwater and estuarine amite Range. The northern biome shares many species fishes, while Nguyen & Ngo (2001) and Nguyen (2005a, with South China, while the southern biome resembles b) cover the ichthyofauna of entire Vietnam. Mai (1978) species assemblages of the Indian-Malayan subcontinent. and Kottelat (2001b) give 201 and 268 species, The Annamite Range itself features a high endemism rate respectively, including some species that were of highly specialized species in short and steep torrential undescribed at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Extant Genera of Fishes of the Order Cypriniformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi)
    Zootaxa 4476 (1): 006–039 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4476.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C2F41B7E-0682-4139-B226-3BD32BE8949D Phylogenetic classification of extant genera of fishes of the order Cypriniformes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi) MILTON TAN1,3 & JONATHAN W. ARMBRUSTER2 1Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA. 2Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 101 Rouse Life Sciences Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The order Cypriniformes is the most diverse order of freshwater fishes. Recent phylogenetic studies have approached a consensus on the phylogenetic relationships of Cypriniformes and proposed a new phylogenetic classification of family- level groupings in Cypriniformes. The lack of a reference for the placement of genera amongst families has hampered the adoption of this phylogenetic classification more widely. We herein provide an updated compilation of the membership of genera to suprageneric taxa based on the latest phylogenetic classifications. We propose a new taxon: subfamily Esom- inae within Danionidae, for the genus Esomus. Key words: Cyprinidae, Cobitoidei, Cyprinoidei, carps, minnows Introduction The order Cypriniformes is the most diverse order of freshwater fishes, numbering over 4400 currently recognized species (Eschmeyer & Fong 2017), and the species are of great interest in biology, economy, and in culture. Occurring throughout North America, Africa, Europe, and Asia, cypriniforms are dominant members of a range of freshwater habitats (Nelson 2006), and some have even adapted to extreme habitats such as caves and acidic peat swamps (Romero & Paulson 2001; Kottelat et al.
    [Show full text]
  • FAMILY Xenocyprididae Gunther, 1868 - Minnows, Carps, Chubs Etc
    FAMILY Xenocyprididae Gunther, 1868 - minnows, carps, chubs etc. [=Xenocypridina, Hypophthalmichthyina, Opsariichthyini, Cultrinae, Oxygastrinae, Squaliobarbini, Ctenopharyngodoninae, Tanichthyidae, Tanichthyidae] GENUS Anabarilius Cockerell, 1923 - whitefishes, minnows [=Nicholsiculter, Rohanus] Species Anabarilius alburnops (Regan, 1914) - silvery whitefish, silver minnow [=andrewsi] Species Anabarilius andersoni (Regan, 1904) - Yunnan Fu whitefish Species Anabarilius brevianalis Zhou & Cui, 1992 - Canyu minnow Species Anabarilius duoyiheensis Li et al., 2002 - Duoyihe minnow Species Anabarilius goldenlineus Li & Chen, in Li et al., 1995 - goldenline minnow Species Anabarilius grahami (Regan, 1908) - Chenkiang minnow Species Anabarilius liui (Chang, 1944) - Tahochang minnow [=chenghaiensis, luquanensis, qujingensis, yalongensis, yiliangensis] Species Anabarilius longicaudatus Chen, 1986 - Kuaize minnow Species Anabarilius macrolepis Yih & Wu, 1964 - Yi-lung minnow Species Anabarilius maculatus Chen & Chu, 1980 - Nanpan minnow Species Anabarilius paucirastellus Yue & He, 1988 - Lufeng minnow Species Anabarilius polylepis (Regan, 1904) - big whitefish Species Anabarilius qiluensis Chen & Chu, 1980 - Qilu minnow Species Anabarilius qionghaiensis Chen, 1986 - Qionghai minnow Species Anabarilius songmingensis Chen & Chu, 1980 - Songming minnow Species Anabarilius transmontanus (Nichols, 1925) - Kunming minnow Species Anabarilius xundianensis He, in He & Wang, 1984 - Qingshui minnow Species Anabarilius yangzonensis Chen & Chu, 1980 - Yangzon
    [Show full text]
  • Limits and Phylogenetic Relationships of East Asian Fishes in the Subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
    Zootaxa 3681 (2): 101–135 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3681.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64984E2C-1A9E-4086-9D47-74C5D31A4087 Limits and phylogenetic relationships of East Asian fishes in the subfamily Oxygastrinae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) KEVIN L. TANG1,14, MARY K. AGNEW2, M. VINCENT HIRT3,4, DANIEL N. LUMBANTOBING5,6, MORGAN E. RALEY7, TETSUYA SADO8, VIEW-HUNE TEOH9, LEI YANG2, HENRY L. BART10, PHILLIP M. HARRIS9, SHUNPING HE11, MASAKI MIYA8, KENJI SAITOH12, ANDREW M. SIMONS3,13, ROBERT M. WOOD2 & RICHARD L. MAYDEN2 1Department of Biology, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI 48502, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA. E-mails: [email protected] (MKA), [email protected] (LY), [email protected] (RMW), [email protected] (RLM) 3Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. E-mails: [email protected] (MVH), [email protected] (AMS) 4Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. 5Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 6Division of Fishes, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, D.C., 20013, USA. 7Nature Research Center, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27603, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 8Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba, Chiba 260-8682, Japan. E-mails: [email protected] (TS), [email protected] (MM) 9Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN U NBIlANCHED IIORSAL-FIN RAYS AND SUBFAMILY C1,ASSIFICATIOS IN THE FISH FAMILY CYPRINIDAE ABSTRACT. Few known characters separate major cyprinitl line- ages. The n~mlherof unl)ranchecl dorsal-fin rays is useful in this regard to tlie extent that the Cyprininae allriost always have 4, whereas all other cyprinid subfamilies have 3 as 21 basal number. Unbrancliec! dorsal ray counts are given for various cyprinids and related forms. An attempt is made to divide the Cyprinidae into its major phylo- genetic components. Five subfanlilies are recognized: Rasborinae, Cyprininae, Gobioninae, Acheilogn;~thin;!e,ant1 Leuciscinae. Problelns regarding tlie linlits of the Leuciscinae in Eastern Asia are discussed. As has been noted repeatedly (e.g., I)y Sagemehl, 1891; lleean, 1911; Ramaswami, 1955), ~najorgroups within the large f;lniily Cypri~iidae ;ire not readily tlilferenti;~ble.In cyprinid classific;~tionthere has been ;I tendency to chip oft' snlall groups of specialized forms from the central mass of species and to recognize such groups as subfamilies (see, for example, Berg, 1940). Here, the vie~vpointof Kryzanovsky (19.17) is ;~doptecl,n;lniely that the primary division of the Cyprinidae, i.e., into subfamilies, sliould be between the m;~inphylogenetic units. Such a c1:issification provides a more n~eaningfulbasis for co~nparisonbetween the smaller groups of cyprinids and for ~oogeographicanalysis. The clificulty lies in working out certain of these inajor units. Tlie first part of this paper adds some new data that seem to be of assistance Iiere. Tlie second part is a discussion of cyprinid subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Zoogeography of the Cyprinid
    Zoological Studies 42(1): 73-92 (2003) Phylogeny and Zoogeography of the Cyprinid Hemicultrine Group (Cyprinidae: Cultrinae) Ying-Gui Dai1,2 and Jun-Xing Yang2,* 1Animal Science College, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China 2Department of Systematic Zoology, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China (Accepted September 4, 2002) Ying-Gui Dai and Jun-Xing Yang (2003) Phylogeny and zoogeography of the cyprinid hemicultrine group (Cyprinidae: Cultrinae). Zoological Studies 42(1): 73-92. The hemicultrine group consists of middle-sized cyprinids in Asia which taxonomically belong to the subfamily Cultrinae in the Cyprinidae (Cypriniformes), but there has been no convincing generic phylogenetic hypothesis proposal so far. On the basis of a morphological study of 65 specimens soaked in formalin and 14 skeletal specimens of 8 species in 6 genera within the hemicultrine group as an ingroup, a 70-character matrix was obtained. The generic phylogenetic relationships of the hemicultrine group are hypothesized with the matrix by the method of cladistic analysis. When the species Rasborinus lineatus or Cultrichthys erythropterus is used as the sole outgroup, the matrix gives the same single most-parsimonious tree of generic phylogenetic relationships within the hemicultrine group which shows that the hemicultrine group forms a monophyletic group. However, when Rasborinus lineatus is used as the sole outgroup and Cultrichthys erythropterus and Paralaubuca barroni are included in the ingroup, the hemicultrine group is validated to represent a paraphyletic group, and the hemicultrine group and the genus Paralaubuca form a monophyletic group. The tree of generic relationships and zoogeography of the mono- phyletic group comprising the hemicultrine group and the genus Paralaubuca suggest the following: (1) The monophyletic group comprises 2 smaller monophyletic groups: the genera Hemiculterella + Pseudohemiculter + Hainania and the genera Hemiculter + Paralaubuca + Pseudolaubuca + Toxabramis.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum
    Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM Vol.12 No. 1 1989 Zoogeography of the fishes from Indochinese Inland waters with an annotated check-list Maurice Kottelat Contents Introduction 1 and 2 Geographical scope terminology Check-list 3 Discussion A. Generalities 21 B. Inter-basin connections ; 34 C. Heuristic comments on some ichthyogeographical theories involving South-East Asia 37 Bibliography 43 INTRODUCTION Smith (1945) for Thailand, Taki (1974) for the Mekong According to an unpublished bibliography of Indochi- basin in Laos and Kottelat (1985) for the cyprinids of nese freshwater fishes that I completed, 930 native Kampuchea. Day (1875-78, 1888) is still the last com- fish species are known to occur in the inland waters plete reference to Burmese and Indian fishes; Jaya- of the Indochinese Peninsula, certainly making it one ram (1981) presents a more recent compilation for In- of the areas with the most diverse ichthyofauna. diaand Burma, but as far as Burma is concerned, the The study of this rich fish fauna is still in the discov- coverage cannot be satisfactory as the author had ac- ery and survey stage and there is presently no up-to- cess only to material collected before 1940. Mohsin & date reference work for this area. There are few use- Ambak’s (1983) book on western Malaysian fishes ful identification guides for the various countries: suffers from several important flaws (see for example 2 Zakaria-Ismail, 1983) and appears to be merely a Fonds National Suisse pour la Recherche Scienti- summary of the [few] specimens collected by the au- fique. thors. At the border of our area, Weber & de Beau- fort’s (1913-1916) monographs on Cypriniformes and AND Siluriformes are still the major source of information GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE TERMINOLOGY The is the fish fauna on Indonesian freshwater fishes; Inger & Chin (1962) present discussion centered on of the Peninsula, the and Salween ba- present a useful reference for Sabah.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Fisheries in the Sekong, Sesan and Srepok Basins (3S Rivers, Mekong Watershed), with Special Reference to the Sesan River
    FISH AND FISHERIES IN THE SEKONG, SESAN AND SREPOK BASINS (3S RIVERS, MEKONG WATERSHED), WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE SESAN RIVER MK3 August 2013 Optimising cascades of hydropower Eric Baran, Saray Samadee, FISHERIES & Teoh Shwu Jiau and ENVIRONMENT Tran Thanh Cong Authors Eric BARAN (WFC Cambodia), SARAY Samadee (WFC Malaysia), TEOH Shwu Jiau (WFC Malaysia), TRAN Thanh Cong (ICEM) Produced by Mekong Challenge Program for Water & Food Project 3 – Optimising cascades of hydropower for multiple use Lead by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management Suggested citation Eric Baran, Saray Samadee, Teoh Shwu Jiau and Tran Thanh Cong. 2013. Fish And Fisheries in the Sekong, Sesan and Srepok Basins (3s Rivers, Mekong Watershed), with Special Reference to the Sesan River. Project report: Challenge Program on Water & Food Mekong project MK3 “Optimizing the management of a cascade of reservoirs at the catchment level”. ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management, Hanoi Vietnam, 2013 More information www.optimisingcascades.org | www.icem.com.au Image Cover image: Fish catch from the Sesan River. Inside page: Fisherman on Sesan River (photo credit: E. Baran) Project Team Peter-John Meynell (Team Leader), Jeremy Carew-Reid, Peter Ward, Tarek Ketelsen, Matti Kummu, Timo Räsänen, Marko Keskinen, Eric Baran, Olivier Joffre, Simon Tilleard, Vikas Godara, Luke Taylor, Truong Hong, Tranh Thi Minh Hue, Paradis Someth, Chantha Sochiva, Khamfeuane Sioudom, Mai Ky Vinh, Tran Thanh Cong Copyright 2013 ICEM - International Centre for Environmental Management 6A Lane 49, Tô Ngoc Vân| Tay Ho, HA NOI | Socialist Republic of Viet Nam ii MEKONG CPWF| Optimising cascades of hydropower (MK3) Fish and Fisheries in the Sekong, Sesan and Srepok Basins (3S Rivers, Mekong Watershed), with special reference to the Sesan River TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprinid Phylogeny Based on Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Analyses of Partitioned Data: Implications for Cyprinidae Systematics
    SCIENCE CHINA Life Sciences • RESEARCH PAPER • September 2012 Vol.55 No.9: 761–773 doi: 10.1007/s11427-012-4366-z Cyprinid phylogeny based on Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data: implications for Cyprinidae systematics WANG XuZhen1, GAN XiaoNi1, LI JunBing1, MAYDEN Richard L.2 & HE ShunPing1* 1Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China; 2Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103-2010, USA Received April 25, 2012; accepted July 16, 2012 Cyprinidae is the biggest family of freshwater fish, but the phylogenetic relationships among its higher-level taxa are not yet fully resolved. In this study, we used the nuclear recombination activating gene 2 and the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA and cytochrome b genes to reconstruct cyprinid phylogeny. Our aims were to (i) demonstrate the effects of partitioned phylo- genetic analyses on phylogeny reconstruction of cyprinid fishes; (ii) provide new insights into the phylogeny of cyprinids. Our study indicated that unpartitioned strategy was optimal for our analyses; partitioned analyses did not provide better-resolved or -supported estimates of cyprinid phylogeny. Bayesian analyses support the following relationships among the major mono- phyletic groups within Cyprinidae: (Cyprininae, Labeoninae), ((Acheilognathinae, ((Leuciscinae, Tincinae), Gobioninae)), Xenocyprininae). The placement of Danioninae was poorly resolved. Estimates of divergence dates within the family showed that radiation of the major cyprinid groups occurred during the Late Oligocene through the Late Miocene. Our phylogenetic analyses improved our understanding of the evolutionary history of this important fish family. Cyprinidae, phylogeny, molecular dating, partitioned analyses Citation: Wang X Z, Gan X N, Li J B, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Fisheries Resource Enhancement and Conservation in Asia Xi RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22
    RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22 Inland fisheries resource enhancement and conservation in Asia xi RAP PUBLICATION 2010/22 INLAND FISHERIES RESOURCE ENHANCEMENT AND CONSERVATION IN ASIA Edited by Miao Weimin Sena De Silva Brian Davy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS REGIONAL OFFICE FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Bangkok, 2010 i The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. ISBN 978-92-5-106751-2 All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to: Chief Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch Communication Division FAO Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to: [email protected] © FAO 2010 For copies please write to: Aquaculture Officer FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Maliwan Mansion, 39 Phra Athit Road Bangkok 10200 THAILAND Tel: (+66) 2 697 4119 Fax: (+66) 2 697 4445 E-mail: [email protected] For bibliographic purposes, please reference this publication as: Miao W., Silva S.D., Davy B.
    [Show full text]
  • 41598 2020 73648 Moesm1
    Supplementary information Comparing fish prey diversity for a critically endangered aquatic mammal in a reserve and the wild using eDNA metabarcoding. Chanjuan Qu1,2, Kathryn A. Stewart1,3, Rute Clemente-Carvalho2, Jinsong Zheng4, Yuxiang Wang2, Cheng Gong5, Limin Ma1, Jianfu Zhao1 & Stephen C. Lougheed2 1. State Key Laboratory for Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China 2. Department of Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada 3. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands 4. Key Laboratory of Aquatic Biodiversity and Conservation of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China 5. Administrative Office of Hubei Yangtze Tian’eZhou Baiji National Natural Reserve, Shishou, Hubei, China Supplementary tables Table S1: The geographical location and water quality parameters among 15 sampling sites (Fig. 1) between two seasons (spring and summer) and sampling regions (Tian-e-Zhou Reserve and Poyang Lake). Sampling depth Dissolved Temperature (℃) pH Region Site Location (m) Oxygen (mg/L) spring summer spring summer spring summer spring summer A 29°51′06N, 112°33′56E 12.99 12.99 13.2 23.3 7.684 7.160 10.39 2.57 Tian-e- Zhou B 29°50′39N, 112°33′06E 12.99 12.99 13.0 23.4 7.634 7.161 10.35 1.63 Reserve C 29°49′47N, 112°32′49E 7.50 7.50 15.2 27.7 8.123 6.977 13.46 7.76 D 29°49′36N, 112°36′44E 12.99 12.99 14.8 23.9 7.604 7.103 9.83 1.04 E
    [Show full text]