DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of U.S. Refugee Resettlement Programs and Library of Congress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of U.S. Refugee Resettlement Programs and Library of Congress DOCUMENT RESUME ED 206 779 OD 021 643 AUTHOR Moore, Charlotte J. TITLE Review of U.S. Refugee Resettlement Programs and Policies. A Report. Revised. INSTITUT:ON Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Congressional Research Service. REPORT NO SR-052-070-05409-3 PUB DATE 80 NOTE 350p.: Prepared at the request of Senator Edward M. Kennedy, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 96th Congress, 2nd Session. Not available in paper copy due to reproduction quality of original document. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 ($6.50). EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Cubans: *Federal Legislation: *Federal Programs: *Immigrants: Indochinese: *Land Settlement; *Refugees: *Relocation: Social Services IDENTIFIERS Chileans: Hungarians: Kurds: Russians ABSTRACT This government report reviews U.S. refugee resettlement programs and policies. Part I of the book provides an overview of b.S. refugee admissions programs and discusses refugee admissions policies for two time frames: 1945 to 1965, and 1965 to the present. In Part II an analysis of Federal assistance programs for do'estic resettlement of refugees is found. This section describes assistance offered to refugees resettling in the U.S. and the legislation and programs authorizing such assistance. The Refugee Act of 1980 is covered in Part III. Major issues of the act are outlined along with its legislative history. The section concludes with a section-by-section summary of the Act. Appendices contain the complete text of the 1980 Refugee Act, a conference report and analysis of the Act, and a report on refugee resettlement in the U.S. by the TransCentury Foundation. The TransCentary report presents information regarding the Cuban, Hungarian, Indochinese, Chilean, Kurdish, and Soviet resettlement efforts, resettlement organizations, the needs of refugees, and resettlement models of other western nations. Recommendations are offered and suggestions are made for refocusing efforts in some areas. (ARM) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * 1.8 from the original document. * *********************************************************************** 06th Congress COMMITTEE PRINT 26 Session J REVIEW OF U.S. REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT CV P p PROGRAMS AND POLICIES LLI ' A REPORT PREPARED AT THEREQUEST OF' Senator EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Chaim('n COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE BY THE CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS NINETY-SIXTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION U.S. OEPAIITIAIMIT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) VC/hes document has been reproduced as received from the person of orgammoon originating it Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Points of we*, or opinions stated in this docu ment do not necessarily represent official NIE position or polo a S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WHO I WASHINGTON IIIRO 0114 I or sale tip the Stiperintetolent of Itoruments.U.S Government Printing Office Widangton, D (' 20402 qw4 4 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts, Chairman BIRCH BAYS, Indiana STROM THURMOND, South Carolina ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia CHARLES McC. MATHIAS, JI., Maryland JOSEPH It. BIDEN, Ja., Delaware PAUL LAXALT, Nevada JOHN C. CULVER, Iowa ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah HOWARD M. METZENBAUhi, Ohio ROBERT DOLE, Kansas DENNIS DECONCINI, Arizona THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont ALAN K. SIMPSON, Wyoming MAX BAUCUS, Montana HOWELL HEFLIN, Alabama 8TrPHNN Baryca, Chief Counted Milner Stizatmn, Minority Chk f Counsel Jemmy H. TINKER. Counsel for Immigration andRefugee Affair* (II) a FOREWORD America has been a haven for the world's homelesssince the first colonists reached theseshores four centuries American people have ago. Since then, the a record of accomplishment inoffering a help- ing hand to refugeesthat is unsurpassed byany other nation. We can be proud of thisrecord. Over manyyears we have responded generously and compassionatelyto the needs of the homeless, national policy of welcome and our well. has served our country andour traditions But for too longour policy toward refugee assistance ment lacked effective programing and resettle- and planning. We admittedrefugees in fits and starts becauseour immigration law was inadequate out of date. Once refugees and arrived, our resettlementprograms and policies were inconsistentand out of touch with today's To bring some long overdue needs. reform to our eountry's refugeepolicies and programs, Congresshas enacted "The Refugee stated in the first title Act of 1980." ks of the act, the objectives ofthe act were "to provide a permanent andsystematic procedure for this country of refugees the admission to of special humanitarianconcern to the United States, and to providecomprehensive and uniform effective resettlement and provisions for the admitted." absorption of those refugeeswho are The new law accomplishessix basic. objectives 1. It repeals the previous law's : by providing discriminatory treatment of refugees a new definition of a refugeemovingus away from only accepting refugees"from communism" Middle Eastto all who or certain areas of the meet the test of the 1' N.Convention and Protocol on the Status ofRefugees. 2. It raises the annual limitation on regular refugeeadmissions from 17,400 to 50,000 eachfiscal year. 3. It provides for an orderly but flexible procedureto deal with emergency refugee situations ii theresettlement needs of refugeesof "special humanitarian concern"to the United States cannot bemet within the rve-rillar ceilingestablished prior to the beg fiscal year. nning of the ,4. It replaces the former use of the "parole ant horits" containedin section 212(d) (5) of theImmigration and Nationality Actwhichhas been governed only bycustom and practice--withnew statutory lan- guage asserting congressional control(i.e., formal "const,ltations") over the entire process of admittingrefugees. 5. It establishesan explicit asylum provision in for the first time. oer immigration law 0. It provides for a full rangy of Federal programs to assist inthe resettlement process, and statutorilycreates the Office of Refugee Re- settlement to monitor, coordinate, programs. and implement refugee resettlement 4 IV Together, these provisions will enable the UnitedStates, to meet any refugee situation. anywhere. and to deal with it moreeffectively and efficiently. The new law ends years of ad hoc programsand differing policies toward different refugees. and puts ourrefugee programs on a firmer footing. To give some perspective to this new law. Iasked the Library of Congress to update an earlier study on V.S.refugee resettlement pro- grams. and to review forthe committee the evolution of U.S. refugee law and policy. revised edition of that study has now beensubmitted to the committee by theCongressional Research Service and is ',tinted in this volume, along with other backgroundmaterial on refugee pro- grams and policies. The committee hopes this report will contribute to abetter public understanding of U.S. refugee programs. EDWARD NI. KENNEDY. rthil e. ColllInith I Mt the 12/41iria ry. LETTER OF SUBMITTAL CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, August 8, 1980. Senator EDWARD M. KENNEDY. U.S. Senate, W ash,ington, D.0. DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: I am pleased to submit a reporton U.S. refu- gee resettlement law and policy whichwas preparedatyour request by the Congressional ResearchService. The report was written byCharlotte J. Moore, analyst in social legislation, ofour Education and Public Welfare Division.It is a revised and updated version ofa 1979 CRS paper of the same title by Catherine McHugh. Since thattime, major legislation, the Refugee Act of 1980, was enacted by Congress. Ms. Moore's update focuseson the development of the RefugeeAct in the context of past U.S. refugee admission and resettlementprograms and policies. We hope that this report willserve the needs of the Committeeon the Judiciary, as wellas the needs of other Committees and Members of Congress concerned withU.S. refugee policy. Sincerely, GI LBERT GUDE, Director. if CONTENTS Forward by SenatorKennedy Page Letter of Submittal TB Introduction v Part I. Overview of U.S. refugee admissionsprograms 1 1. Legislativeandadministrative 3 admissions: 1945-65_ actionsaffecting refugee A. Presidential directiveof December 22, 1945 7 B. Displaced PersonsAct of 1948 7 C. Immigration andNationality Act of 1952 7 1. Defector privision_ 7 2. Parole provision 8 3. Withholdingdeportation because of 8 persecution anticipated D. Act of July 29,1953 8 E. The Refugee ReliefAct of 1953 8 F. Hungarian refugeeprogram 8 G. Refugee-EscapeeAct 9 H. Act of September2, 1958 9 1. Refugee fair sharelaw 10 II. Refugee admissionslegislation and procedure 10 A. Conditional entry after 1965 11 B. Parole 11 C. Withholdingdeportation 12 D. Asylum 15 E. Special legislation 15 to refugees providing permanentresident status F. Other legislationimpacting on refugee 16 Part II. Federal assistancefor domestic resettlementadmissions. 17 I. Assistance torefugees resettling in the of refugees__ 19 it historical overview.. United States: A. The involvementof the private sector 19 B. Federal involvementin assisting refugee 19 1. State Department resettlement__ ___ _ 22 2. The DepartmentofHealth, 23 Welfare Education,and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews
    "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" By Maddalena Marinari University of Kansas, 2009 B.A. Istituto Universitario Orientale Submitted to the Department of History and the Faculty of The Graduate School of the University Of Kansas in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Defended: 14 December 2009 The Dissertation Committee for Maddalena Marinari certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: "Liberty, Restriction, and the Remaking of Italians and Eastern European Jews, (1882-1965)" Committee: __________________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey Moran, Chair __________________________________________ Dr. Donna Gabaccia __________________________________________ Dr. Sheyda Jahanbani __________________________________________ Dr. Roberta Pergher __________________________________________ Dr. Ruben Flores Date Approved: 14 December 2009 2 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Chapter 1: From Unwanted to Restricted (1890-1921) ………………………………………...17 Chapter 2: "The doors of America are worse than shut when they are half-way open:" The Fight against the Johnson-Reed Immigration
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Order 14013 of February 4, 2021
    8839 Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 86, No. 25 Tuesday, February 9, 2021 Title 3— Executive Order 14013 of February 4, 2021 The President Rebuilding and Enhancing Programs To Resettle Refugees and Planning for the Impact of Climate Change on Migration By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nation- ality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., I hereby order as follows: Section 1. Policy. The long tradition of the United States as a leader in refugee resettlement provides a beacon of hope for persecuted people around the world, promotes stability in regions experiencing conflict, and facilitates international collaboration to address the global refugee crisis. Through the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP), the Federal Govern- ment, cooperating with private partners and American citizens in commu- nities across the country, demonstrates the generosity and core values of our Nation, while benefitting from the many contributions that refugees make to our country. Accordingly, it shall be the policy of my Administration that: (a) USRAP and other humanitarian programs shall be administered in a manner that furthers our values as a Nation and is consistent with our domestic law, international obligations, and the humanitarian purposes ex- pressed by the Congress in enacting the Refugee Act of 1980, Public Law 96–212. (b) USRAP should be rebuilt and expanded, commensurate with global need and the purposes described above. (c) Delays in administering USRAP and other humanitarian programs are counter to our national interests, can raise grave humanitarian concerns, and should be minimized.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2009 a Monthly Legal Publication of the Executive Office for Immigration Review Vol 3
    U.S. Department of Justice http://eoirweb/library/lib_index.htm Executive Office for Immigration Review Published since 2007 Immigration Law Advisor May 2009 A Monthly Legal Publication of the Executive Office for Immigration Review Vol 3. No.5 Assistance in Persecution Under Duress: In this issue... The Supreme Court’s Decision in Negusie v. Holder and the Misplaced Reliance on Page 1: Feature Article: Fedorenko v. United States Assistance in Persecution Under Duress: The Supreme Court’s by Brigette L. Frantz Decision in Negusie v. Holder ... Page 5: Federal Court Activity t is a difficult issue faced by the immigration courts. An individual appears in immigration court seeking asylum on account of a Page 12: BIA Precedent Decisions Istatutorily protected ground—race, religion, nationality, membership Page 13: Regulatory Update in a particular social group, or political opinion. The Immigration Judge hears testimony revealing that the respondent is fully credible and has, in fact, suffered persecution and appears eligible for asylum. Yet, the Immigration Judge finds that the respondent is statutorily barred from The Immigration Law Advisor is asylum in the United States based on his participation and assistance in the a professional monthly newsletter of the Executive Office for Immigration persecution of others. This statutory provision, more commonly referred Review (“EOIR”) that is intended to as the “persecutor bar,” precludes the granting of asylum to anyone who solely as an educational resource has “ordered, incited, assisted, or otherwise participated in the persecution to disseminate information on of any person on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a developments in immigration law particular social group, or political opinion.” Section 208(b)(2)(A)(i) of pertinent to the Immigration Courts the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    The Labor of Refuge: Kalmyk Displaced Persons, the 1948 Displaced Persons Act, and the Origins of U.S. Refugee Resettlement By Jessica Johnson B.A., University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 2003 A.M., Brown University, 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of American Studies at Brown University Providence, Rhode Island May, 2013 © Copyright 2013 by Jessica Johnson This dissertation by Jessica Johnson is accepted in its present form by the Department of American Studies as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date_________________ __________________________________ Robert Lee, Advisor Recommended to the Graduate Council Date_________________ __________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Reader Date_________________ __________________________________ Naoko Shibusawa, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date_________________ __________________________________ Peter Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii CURRICULUM VITAE Jessica Johnson was born in Wichita, Kansas on July 17, 1981. She received a Bachelor of Arts in History and Chemistry from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities in 2003 and a Master of Arts in Public Humanities from Brown University in 2006. As a doctoral student at Brown University, she worked on public history projects at the Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology, the John Nicholas Brown Center and the Smithsonian Institution. She also coordinated programs for the Sarah Doyle Women’s Center and taught several undergraduate courses. Johnson’s work has been supported by the Joukowsky Family Foundation Presidential Dissertation Fellowship and the Mary L.S. Downes Dissertation Fellowship from Brown University; the Myrna F. Bernath Fellowship from the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations; and the Andrew Mellon Fellowship in Humanistic Studies from the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the American Committee on Italian Migration Records CMS.001
    Guide to the American Committee on Italian Migration Records CMS.001 This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit July 25, 2014 Describing Archives: A Content Standard Center for Migration Studies May 20, 1974 Guide to the American Committee on Italian Migration Records CMS.0 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographical/Historical note.......................................................................................................................... 5 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................... 5 Arrangement note...........................................................................................................................................6 Administrative Information .........................................................................................................................6 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Controlled Access Headings..........................................................................................................................7 Other Finding Aids note................................................................................................................................8 Collection Inventory.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CWS Strongly Opposes the RAISE Act, Urges Congress to Reject Anti-Family, Anti-Refugee Bill
    CWS Strongly Opposes The RAISE Act, Urges Congress to Reject Anti-Family, Anti-Refugee Bill Church World Service (CWS), a 71-year old humanitarian organization representing 37 Protestant, Anglican, and Orthodox communions, strongly opposes the “Reforming American Immigration for a Strong Economy” (RAISE) Act. We urge all Members of Congress to reject this anti-family and anti- refugee legislation introduced by Senators Cotton (R-AR) and Perdue (R-GA) and supported by President Trump. The RAISE Act would permanently cap refugee admissions at 50,000 per year, the lowest resettlement goal in U.S. history, during the largest global refugee crisis in world history. Despite the sponsors’ citation of an arbitrary “13-year average”, the average annual resettlement goal between when Congress passed the 1980 Refugee Act and today has been 95,000, and the average number of resettled refugees has been 80,000.1 Such a drastic, permanent cut to resettlement would reduce U.S. leadership abroad and tie the hands of the State Department in key diplomatic negotiations to encourage other countries to keep their doors open to refugees and allow refugees to work and refugee children to go to school. Refugee resettlement is a cost-effective form of humanitarian relief that is a lifeline for those who cannot return to their homes or rebuild their lives in a nearby country.2 Refugees contribute meaningfully to the U.S. economy as earners and taxpayers, including more than $56 billion in spending power.3 This bill dishonors the sanctity of families and commodifies the worth of individuals by making family reunification inaccessible and essentially only permitting individuals who have certain education levels, employment, and English-language ability to enter the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Myths: How U.S. Policies and Practices Are Controlling the Border Narrative at the Expense of Asylum Seekers
    Woods: Border Myths: How U.S. Policies and Practices Are Controlling the Woods camera ready (Do Not Delete) 1/18/2020 12:00 PM BORDER MYTHS: HOW U.S. POLICIES AND PRACTICES ARE CONTROLLING THE BORDER NARRATIVE AT THE EXPENSE OF ASYLUM SEEKERS CINDY S. WOODS* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 82 I. TRUMP’S BORDER WALL IMPERATIVE ...................................... 84 II. INTERNATIONAL LAW OBLIGATIONS AND THE UNITED STATES’ APPROACH TO ASYLUM SEEKERS ................................... 87 A. International Law Obligations to Asylum Seekers ....... 88 1. The Non-Refoulement Principle ............................. 88 a. Non-Rejection ................................................... 89 b. Access to Fair and Efficient Asylum Procedures ................................................ 90 B. U.S. Interpretations of International Obligations ........ 91 1. Exclusion of the Non-Rejection Principle ............. 92 2. Punitive Measures for Illegal Entrants ................. 93 3. Expedited Removal and the Credible Fear Process ............................................................... 94 III. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL THE BORDER NARRATIVE ............................................................. 96 A. Port of Entry Denials .................................................. 96 B. CBP Abuse at the Border .......................................... 102 C. Increased Prosecution of Illegal Border Crossers ... 107 * J.D. Georgetown University Law
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Canada's Participation in the Canada
    SETTLAGE_MACRO (DO NOT DELETE) 11/27/2012 1:25 PM INDIRECT REFOULEMENT: CHALLENGING CANADA’S PARTICIPATION IN THE CANADA-UNITED STATES SAFE THIRD COUNTRY AGREEMENT RACHEL GONZALEZ SETTLAGE* ABSTRACT In December 2004, the Canada-United States Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) entered into effect. Pursuant to this agreement, each country recognizes the other as a safe third country in which asylum- seekers are protected from persecution and accordingly requires asylum seekers to request asylum protection in the first of whichever of the two countries they arrive. However, U.S. and Canadian refugee laws are not entirely consistent, and U.S. law and policy does not adequately protect bona fide asylum seekers from refoulement (the return of the refugee to a country in which his life or freedom would be threatened). This article argues that U.S. laws and policies that result in the refoulement of bona fide asylum seekers to their country of feared persecution violate U.S. obligations under the UN Refugee Convention. In turn, when Canada refuses to hear the claim of a bona fide asylum seeker arriving from the United States and returns that asylum seeker to the United States pursuant to the STCA, if that asylum seeker is then refouled, Canada is also responsible for violating the UN Refugee Convention. This article then explores a 2007 legal challenge to Canada’s participation in the STCA before the Canadian Federal Court, Canadian Council for Refugees et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen, which was ultimately unsuccessful on appeal. However, in a March 2011 decision, John Doe et al.
    [Show full text]
  • How REAL ID's Credibility and Corroboration Requirements Impair
    CONROY_MACRO2 (DO NOT DELETE) 4/20/2009 9:47:08 AM Real Bias: How REAL ID’s Credibility and Corroboration Requirements Impair Sexual Minority Asylum Applicants Melanie A. Conroy† I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................2 II. SEXUAL MINORITIES AND THE LAW OF ASYLUM.......................................3 III. PRE-REAL ID CREDIBILITY AND CORROBORATION LAW AND PROBLEMS..................................................................................................5 A. Pre-Real ID Corroboration Law......................................................... 5 B. Pre-Real ID Corroboration Problems................................................. 7 i. Corroborating the Persecution of Similarly-Situated Individuals ...................................................................................8 ii. Corroborating One’s Sexual Minority Membership ..................10 C. Pre-Real ID Credibility Law............................................................ 11 D. Pre-Real ID Credibility Problems .................................................... 13 i. Airport Statements .....................................................................13 ii. The Social Visibility Requirement: Demeanor, Plausibility, and Consistency .........................................................................15 iii. Social Constructions of Gender and Sexuality: External Consistency................................................................................18 IV. REAL ID: ITS HISTORY, CONTENT,
    [Show full text]
  • Fulfilling US Commitment to Refugee Resettlement
    Texas A&M Law Review Volume 5 Issue 1 1-12-2018 Fulfilling U.S. Commitment ot Refugee Resettlement: Protecting Refugees, Preserving National Security, & Building the U.S. Economy Through Refugee Admissions Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Law Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Immigration Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, Nonprofit Organizations Law Commons, Other Law Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Public Policy Commons, Social Policy Commons, Social Welfare Commons, Social Welfare Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, Fulfilling U.S. Commitment ot Refugee Resettlement: Protecting Refugees, Preserving National Security, & Building the U.S. Economy Through Refugee Admissions, 5 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 155 (2018). Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V5.I1.5 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Texas A&M Law Review by an authorized editor of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\T\TWL\5-1\TWL106.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-DEC-17 8:20 REPORT FULFILLING U.S. COMMITMENT TO REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT: PROTECTING REFUGEES, PRESERVING NATIONAL SECURITY, & BUILDING THE U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Progression of 20Th Century Immigration Law and The
    1 When Law Labels Bandits: The Progression of 20th Century Immigration Law and the Italian Community’s Response, 1919-1965 A Senior Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Brian Francesco Jordan The Ohio State University June 2012 Project Advisor: Professor Donna J. Guy, Department of History 2 Dedicated to: My grandparents, Frank D. and Joanne M. Casali, My great-grandparents Domenica and Domenico Casali and to the rest of my family. A Special Thanks: I would like to thank Professor Donna Guy for mentoring me throughout this research project, for assisting me in applying for an honors travel grant to perform archival research at the University of Minnesota Immigration History Research Center and for providing extensive editing and feedback on this thesis. This project would not have been possible without the excellent guidance and assistance from Professor Guy, which began during my second year at Ohio State. I would also like to thank Professor Judy Wu for agreeing to serve on my defense committee and providing her extensive feedback and editing. Moreover, I would like to thank Professor David Steigerwald for agreeing to serve on my committee and for reviewing my thesis. Finally, I would like to thank the members of the University of Minnesota Immigration History Research Center in allowing me to conduct research at their facility and providing assistance during my research. 3 Table of Contents Introduction…………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter 1……………………………………………………………………… 9 -Background: Law as a Barrier………………………………………….. 11 -The Johnson-Reed Act…...……………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Rauma at the Border: the Human Cost of Inhumane Immigration Policies
    U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS TRAUMA AT THE BORDER THE HUMAN COST OF INHUMANE IMMIGRATION POLICIES BRIEFING REPORT U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Washington, DC 20425 Official Business OCTOBER 2019 Penalty for Private Use $300 Visit us on the Web: www.usccr.gov U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an Catherine E. Lhamon, Chairperson* independent, bipartisan agency established Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chairperson by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: Debo P. Adegbile Gail L. Heriot • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are Peter N. Kirsanow being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their David Kladney race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national Karen Narasaki origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. Michael Yaki • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution Mauro Morales, Staff Director because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to Washington, DC 20425 discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or (202) 376-8128 voice national origin, or in the administration of justice. TTY Relay: 711 • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information www.usccr.gov in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress.
    [Show full text]