DOCSLIB.ORG

Sawbridgeworth Town Council's Response to EHDC Draft District Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sawbridgeworth Town Council Sayesbury Manor, Bell Street, Sawbridgeworth Hertfordshire CM21 9AN Tel: 01279 724537 MAYOR Fax: 01279 726966 Cllr Mrs Angela Alder e-mail: [email protected] TOWN CLERK web: www.sawbridgeworth-tc.gov.uk Richard Bowran BSc.(Hons) MILCM Response by Sawbridgeworth Town Council to the East Herts District Council Draft District Plan Preferred Options Consultation STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 1 Preamble Sawbridgeworth Town Council has held three open days over the period of the Consultation to learn the views of the parishioners of the town on the subject of the Preferred Options contained in the East Herts District Council Draft District Plan (DDP). The first two were held on the Farmers’ Market days on Saturday 01 March and Saturday 05 April 2014. The third took place as an integral part of the Annual Town Meeting which was held on Monday 14 April 2014. The role of the Town Council at this stage is to respond to the Preferred Option document. It is not the intention of the Town Council to be negative, however STC endorses the views of the large number of respondents who have already aired their views through the open days held at the Town Council and consultation at the Annual Town Meeting. Introduction There are three principal areas in the Preferred Options Consultation that are of concern parishioners of Sawbridgeworth. They are: Chapter 8: Sawbridgeworth Chapter 10: Villages Chapter 12: The Gilston Area These will be commented upon in turn, however, the general tenure of opinion must first be considered. STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 2 Executive Summary General The key areas of concern of a general nature that is reflected by consultation with local people are: There is a need for a bypass before increasing housing since the existing road network is at saturation level There is a need for improved transport links, without which there is no point in housing more people in the area (para 8.1.1) It is fundamental that in future any “affordable” homes should be made available for local people as a priority. This principle should be enshrined in Policy. (para 8.1.5) There are alternative sites that must be considered in addition to those highlighted in the Preferred Options statement. A number of the points made in the Stop Harlow North (SHN) response are relevant. West Road The responses of over 250 entries to the portal shows that the key areas of concern in the SAWB2 and SAWB3 Preferred sites are: Traffic access Schools Reduction of Green Field spacing between towns Air pollution Threat to watercourses Surgery capacity Not needed to support employment STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 3 Villages Irrational to separate Spellbrook from Sawbridgeworth Hayter is a major employer in the area (170) – key to economic growth Not practical to develop a discrete Neighbourhood Plan Gilston Area An unsustainable development No exceptional circumstances to justify a change in the Green Belt Boundary Devastates landscape integrity Infrastructure deficit Exceeds environmental capacity Devastating effects of cumulative development STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 4 Chapter 8: Sawbridgeworth As a principle STC accepts that future development planning should be conducted to cater for future needs but must also be mindful of the existing communities. STC believes there should be provision within the plan for affordable homes to be made available expressly for local people. It is acknowledged that if Sawbridgeworth is to follow the spirit of the DDP in providing a framework for future development to meet the expected housing needs to 2031, then a share of this development can be expected within the Town. We do not believe that the current single geographical site focus on one site either side of West Road is tenable as there are no possible measures to mitigate the acute transport issues such a development would cause on a constricted residential road. If the volume of building at the level indicated as 400 unit is justified, then consideration should be given to dispersing the units to other sites in a way that the road transport infrastructure can be amended. In order to preserve the principle of the Green Belt it would be expected that the DDP would seek to compensate for Green Belt land compromised by these sites by including the equivalent areas in a re-ordered boundary. It is acknowledged that the rail transport is currently running at capacity on the Cambridge – London Liverpool Street line and is therefore a constricting factor. It is noted that without a s106 Agreement to enforce some contribution from developers to support reinforcement of local infrastructure the proposed development would exert unacceptable; stress and destabilise the existing Health, Education and utility services. Stop Harlow North – In general terms the development of prime farming land rather than lower classed land would seem to be in conflict with the NPPPF para 12. The specified development area lies immediately under the southerly landing approach flight path of London Stansted airport where planes pass at 5000 feet. The DDP seems focused on homes rather than correlating housing needs with centres of employment which would promote the plan as a sustainable solution by aiming to reduce out-commuting and one of the greatest pressures on transport provision. STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 5 West Road Area The role of the Town Council at this stage is to respond to the Preferred Option document. It is not the intention of the Town Council to be negative, however STC endorses the views of the large number of respondents who have already aired their views through the open days held at the Town Council and consultation at the Annual Town Meeting. The overwhelming view was to object to the West Road proposals (SAWB2 and SAWB3) in their present form. The main thrust of objection to what is considered to be an ill-considered set of options are infrastructure pressures and the impact on quality of the environment and life. Specific issues are: Traffic access There clearly is no practical way of mitigating the road connection issues which would result from sitting 400 additional home on a local residential road/lane coupled with congestion problems on the adjoining trunk road. The specific statement (para 8.2.8) shows a misunderstanding of the locality. Education School places are clearly and demonstrably under pressure as evidenced by current reports (April/May 2014) of the failure to provide local places for local children. The provision of an additional form of entry at Mandeville School (para 8.1.6) is clearly inadequate. There is no provision for developing further places in anticipation of further demand on places. Reduction of Green Field spacing between towns The Urban Extension proposed involves the change in Green Belt boundaries and reduces the buffer zone between towns (para 8.1.3). The proposal will not prevent urban sprawl (para 4.1.1) Air pollution This has been acknowledged as a significant problem and is naturally associated with traffic problems and the additional congestion that will be inevitable under the Preferred Option proposals. (para 8.1.1) Threat to watercourses The statement made in the section subsequent to (para 8.2.8) acknowledges the significant issues relating to urban drainage and sewerage which will be STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 6 introduced by replacing the adequacy of the natural environment by an urban extension to the town Surgery capacity Although acknowledging the increase in demand for services including healthcare, even the current (May 2014) planning application for increasing the capacity of the Central Surgery will serve only to play catch up on current inadequacies and is woefully inadequate for future growth.(para 8.5.2) Not needed to support employment The statement that Sawbridgeworth has a limited employment offer (para 8.1.8) (para 8.3.2) suggests that the proposals at SAWB2 and SAWB3 are disproportionate. To mitigate the impact upon the area other sites should be considered. For example it is important to the historic environment of the area that a site of international importance is considered and protected. (para 8.1.9) Rivers Orchard Area The Rivers Orchard Site is a site of international renown and of great historical importance for the reasons outlined here. It is the wish of the Town Council that the site be preserved in perpetuity as a community asset and to be enhanced by regular maintenance and provision of a visitors centre. In recent years a Friends Group ,later to become Rivers Nursery Site and Orchard Group had undertaken voluntary supervision of the site and had promoted it’s interest. In March 2014 an announcement was made that the RNSOG intended to dissolve and would cease activity. This has now been replaced by the newly formed Rivers Heritage Site and Orchard. The contractual owner, Deville Estates, has published a desire to develop part of the site and we believe they intend to respond to the consultation. They have expressed an intention to cede a large proportion of the site to the community as part of the proposition to develop. The Town Council’s view is that ideally the whole of the current site should be preserved for community use. However we should like to keep an open mind on the matter and see what the land owner has in mind in terms of what may be protected in perpetuity. We should reserve judgment therefore based on the nature of the offer, the desires of the local community following consultation, and the suitability of the site for the proposed uses. STC Response to EHDC Plan 150521 Page 7 Rivers Nursery was established by John Rivers who came to Sawbridgeworth from Berkshire.
Recommended publications
  • Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 Entry)

    Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 Entry)

    Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 entry) Author: Mr R Newman Responsible Committee: Full Governing Body Ambition · Pride · Success Haileybury Turnford School Admission Arrangements for 2021-22 The school will have a published admission number of 182 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with an Education Health & Care Plan (EHCP) that names the school. If there are fewer applications than places available, all applicants will be offered a place. If there are more applications than places available, the criteria outlined below will be used to allocate applications. Rule 1 Looked After Children Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child’s arrangements order or a special guardianship order). Rule 2 Medical or Social Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school, which includes children previously abroad who were cared for by the state because he or she would not otherwise have been cared for adequately and subsequently adopted. A panel of HCC officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3 Sibling Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school.
  • Viability Assessment Stage 1

    Viability Assessment Stage 1

    ASSESSING VIABILITY Community Infrastructure Levy: A Stage 1 Economic Viability Assessment prepared for 8 Hertfordshire Authorities: Dacorum Borough Council Three Rivers District Council Watford Borough Council Hertsmere Borough Council Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council St Albans City and District Council East Herts Council Borough of Broxbourne AUTHORITY SPECIFIC VERSION FOR THREE RIVERS DISTRICT COUNCIL Report by: Lambert Smith Hampton: December 2012 Final Assessing Viability Community Infrastructure Levy: A Stage 1 Economic Viability Study: Authority Specific Version for Three Rivers District Council Prepared for: 8 Hertfordshire Authorities Prepared by Lambert Smith Hampton UK House, 180 Oxford Street London W1D 1NN Tel: 020 7198 2000 Fax: 020 7198 2001 Date: December 2012 Foreword: about the authority specific version of this report The Stage 1 Economic Viability Study was commissioned as a single entity and subsequently prepared and delivered by Lambert Smith Hampton as a single report containing the complete data for all 8 client authorities: its contents were discussed and agreed with them in this form. The advantage of this was that it has enabled a composite picture of CIL viability issues to be presented to the clients and discussed collectively with them before finalisation, and there have been many benefits for them in considering these matters as a totality rather than viewing them in isolation. Each district indicated during the course of the report's preparation that they would want to publish a version that focused on data pertaining to that district, and isolated extraneous data relevant only to other authorities. This is that version: it is the authority specific report for Three Rivers District Council.
  • Settlement Appraisal Gilston Area 1. History 1.1 the Supporting Document Records the Various Stages of Assessment That Were Un

    Settlement Appraisal Gilston Area 1. History 1.1 the Supporting Document Records the Various Stages of Assessment That Were Un

    Gilston Area Settlement Appraisal Settlement Appraisal Gilston Area 1. History 1.1 The Supporting Document records the various stages of assessment that were undertaken to inform the Preferred Options District Plan. It therefore provides an essential background to this Settlement Appraisal. In particular, Chapters 4 to 6 of the Supporting Document explained the process of shortlisting or ‘sieving’ options or ‘Areas of Search’. 1.2 On the basis of the assessments contained within the Supporting Document, and the rest of the evidence base that was available at that time, land to the north of Harlow, known as ‘the Gilston Area’ was identified as a preferred location for development. However, given the size and complexity of the site, and the need for the Council to gather further evidence regarding deliverability, the Gilston Area was not proposed for allocation at that stage. Instead, the Preferred Options District Plan identified it as a ‘Broad Location for Development’ for the delivery of between 5,000 and 10,000 new homes, both within this plan period and beyond, along with a range of supporting infrastructure such as new roads, primary and secondary schools, health centres and public open space. 1.3 Given the uncertainty of delivery at that time, and the need to undertake comprehensive masterplanning work, it was proposed that a separate Development Plan Document (DPD) be prepared following adoption of the District Plan in order to allocate the site. The DPD approach would set out the Council’s intention to deliver development during the latter part of the Plan period, and would enable further consideration of site boundaries, Green Belt boundaries and infrastructure requirements.
  • The Impact of the Straw Plait and Hat Trade in Nineteenth-Century

    The Impact of the Straw Plait and Hat Trade in Nineteenth-Century

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Hertfordshire Research Archive How Saucy did it Make the Poor? The Straw Plait and Hat Trades, Illegitimate Fertility and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Hertfordshire NIGEL GOOSE University of Hertfordshire Abstract The straw plait and hat industry provided considerable employment for women and children in south and west Hertfordshire in the nineteenth century, but was absent in much of the north and east. Many contemporaries felt it had a deleterious effect upon morality and the stability of the family, and its regional specificity within Hertfordshire allows these propositions to be tested through a comparative analysis of illegitimacy and examination of the family circumstances of young straw workers. It is discovered that illegitimacy ratios often give a misleading impression, failing to take into account the size of the population ‘at risk’, while illegitimacy rates suggest only minor differences between straw and non-straw areas, a more noticeable feature of the data being the generally higher illegitimacy rates found in Hertfordshire’s small towns. Nor does the evidence suggest that the industry led to early break up of families. The rise and decline of illegitimacy in England between the late eighteenth and late nineteenth centuries presents a continuing conundrum, and while the growth and decay of the straw industry offers little explanatory value, this article suggests that the changing conditions in the agricultural labour
  • OFFICE to LET from 1,847 Sq Ft (171.65 Sq M)

    OFFICE to LET from 1,847 Sq Ft (171.65 Sq M)

    Unit 6A, Quickbury Farm, Hatfield Heath Road, Sawbridgeworth Herts CM21 9HY OFFICE TO LET From 1,847 sq ft (171.65 sq m) • Fully refurbished office space • Good parking provision • Available immediately • Attractive rural setting but close to Sawbridgeworth station www.cokegearing.co.uk Unit 6A, Quickbury Farm, Hatfield Heath Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts CM21 9HY Location: Business Rates: The property is located in an attractive rural setting, half a mile from The offices are currently unrated. Sawbridgeworth station. Sawbridgeworth is a Hertfordshire market town with rail connections to London Liverpool Street. EPC: The EPC rating is C - 73 Bishop’s Stortford, with a population of circa 40,000, is situated approximately 4 miles to the north and Harlow approximately 3 miles to the south, both with Costs: connections to the M11 and wider motorway infrastructure. Stansted Airport Each party to pay their own costs in this matter. is is circa 6 miles away. Description A single-storey converted barn property which has been fully refurbished to provide mainly open plan office space. The main area, which provides open plan space for approximately 20 staff, leads through to a meeting room area and thereafter a kitchen/breakout facility and WCs. To the side of the property is a separate room providing a large boardroom area together with further storage. We understand there is a standard fibre internet connection on the site (not confirmed or tested) and the space is fully air-conditioned with LED lighting. The property is situated within Quickbury Farm, which has a number of further office occupiers. Externally there are approximately six parking spaces outside the property and overflow parking in the adjacent car park.
  • Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan for CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1

    Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan for CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1

    September 19 Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan FOR CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1 HUNSDON EASTWICK AND GILSTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN GROUP Contents 1. Introduction to the Neighbourhood Plan .......................................................... 5 Why have a Neighbourhood Plan? ............................................................................................ 5 Designation of the Neighbourhood Area .................................................................................. 7 Plan Preparation Process ............................................................................................................ 9 Scope of the Plan ......................................................................................................................... 9 Evidence Base .............................................................................................................................10 Key Community Concerns ........................................................................................................ 10 2. Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................... 13 What is Sustainable Development? .......................................................................................... 13 National Planning Policy Framework ....................................................................................... 14 Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission .....................................................................16 East Hertfordshire District Plan ..............................................................................................
  • Hertfordshire. Cop 231

    Hertfordshire. Cop 231

    COURT DffiECrORY.] HERTFORDSHIRE. COP 231 Clark T. West View rd.Heml.Hempstd C{)cks Benjamin, Buntingford RS.O Conisbee Wilfd, Victoriard.Nw.Barnet Clark W. Henry, Piggob fa1"Ill, Little Cockman Miss, 1 Wellington villas, Conisbee Joseph, Lilley cottage, :East Albury, Hadham S.O Broxbourne S.O Barnet road, New Barnet Clark Walter Frederick, Cheshunt st. Cockrem Rev. Oliver Carter ¥.A., Connolly Michael, St. Edmund's col- Waltham Cross LL.D. Watford lege, Standon, Ware Clarke Rev. C. W., M.A. Wallington, Cocks John Robert, 32 Fore street, Connop Herbert M.A. Boreham house, Baldock Hertford Elstree RS.O Clarke Rev.W. Th.A.K.o.L.Ridge,Brnt Cocks RDbert, 12 West st. Hertford Conquest Mrs. Windhill road, Bishop's Clarke Rev. Wm. W. Essendon, Hatfid Cocks Wm. Douro ho. Standon, Ware Stortford Clarke Arthur Mayhew, Northfield, Cockshut Harry, Fernbank, Church- Constable Alfred, 261 High st. Watford Sawbridgeworth RS.O gate, Cheshunt, Waltham Cross Consterdine Rev. Jas. M.A. !Parsonage, Clarke Yooth Frederick, Much Wy- Coe Miss, Iona, Market street, Watford Little Heath, Potter'!! Bar S.O mondley, Stevenage Coe Mrs. 74 Wood street, High Barnet Conway William Thomas, North lodge, Clarke Charles William, Lucerne villa, Coffin Rd. E. 3 Lothair villas, Hatfield Somerset road, New Barnet Wiggenhall road, Watford Coggin: Rev. Frank. Ernes1i M.A. Vi- Cook Alfred M. Red house, Herting- Clarke Edwd. St. Stephens, St.Albans carage, Lemsford, Hatfield fordbury, Hertford Clarke E. Chalk hill, Bushey, Watford Cohen Joseph, Cravenhurst, Market Cook R The Poplars, Stevenage, Herts Clarke Frederick WilIiam, Hazeldean, street, Watford Cook Charles, New road, Ware Lemsford road, St.
  • The Friday Email

    The Friday Email

    THE FRIDAY EMAIL Friday 15th January 2021 The Friday Thought from our Associate Priest, Revd Debbie Our lives are full of endless chatter, be that from the TV, radio, our phones, social media, you name it. As a result of the current crisis, I expect that you, like me, are watching more news items and government briefings than ever before. It seems we’re either being bombarded with noise or actively seeking it out; some would say like an addiction, which drowns out our own thoughts and opportunities for meaningful reflection. I do wonder at times, how much of the babble I really hear? The reading from Samuel underscores the importance of listening. While Samuel is sleeping, he believes he hears someone calling his name. So Samuel wakes up and runs to Eli thinking Eli has called. "Here I am, Lord," he says, running to old Eli who stumbles out of bed and grumbles, "Go back to sleep, you're hearing things." After responding to hearing his name called several times, Eli instructs Samuel to "Go to sleep, and if you are called reply: 'Speak, Lord, for your servant is listening.'" So Samuel follows Eli's orders, and when called upon again, he responds accordingly. And so Samuel grows up with the Lord accompanying him, giving him insight, wisdom, and strength as one of his prophets. This was a time in Israel’s history when Israel was out of communication with God. Eli was getting too old to lead (his loss of vision is what happens to the elderly but is also symbolic of the people’s inability to see the things of God), and his sons were wicked.
  • A Miller's Tale – the Life Of

    A Miller's Tale – the Life Of

    A MILLER’S TALE – THE LIFE OF THOMAS BURTON (1859 – 1938) Thomas Burton was a true scion of Sawbridgeworth. His grandfather John was born here in 1800, and in the 1841 census was living in Cock Street (now Bell Street) in the centre of the town, with his wife Sophia (née Waller) and family. Thomas’ father had the same name, being called Thomas Waller Burton. This Thomas was born in Sawbridgeworth in 1827. In the 1841 census he is shown as serving with the Royal Navy, but by 1851 has returned to Sawbridgeworth and is also living in Cock Street. He was married to Fanny Groves in 1857 and was a builder. Thomas was born in Cock Street on 5 April 1859. He was the second eldest of five children, having two brothers and two sisters. His very early life is obscure. Presumably he intended to follow his father into the building trade, but on 30 September 1885, Thomas married Clara Littler. This is important, because, although her father was a butcher, she was also a member of a long-established family of millers. As long ago as the early 1700s (between 1720 and 1737), an Andrew and Nathaniel Littler are recorded as the millers at both Sawbridgeworth Mill and Sheering Mill. Furthermore, in 1911 a Fanny Littler of Lower Sheering, is recorded as a mortgagee in respect of Sawbridgeworth Mill. Presumably, Thomas’ marriage to Clara made him think seriously about becoming a miller. Accordingly, in 1891, probably (given the 1911 Stort Deeds document) with financial help from the Littler family, he purchased Sawbridgeworth Mill from the local politician Edmund Broughton Barnard.
  • Sawbridgeworth to Bishop's Stortford

    Sawbridgeworth to Bishop's Stortford

    Sawbridgeworth to Bishop’s Stortford (Full Walk) Sawbridgeworth to Bishop’s Stortford (Short Walk) 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 1st walk check 2nd walk check 3rd walk check 15th March 2014 06th July 2019 06th July 2019 Current status Document last updated Sunday, 07th July 2019 This document and information herein are copyrighted to Saturday Walkers’ Club. If you are interested in printing or displaying any of this material, Saturday Walkers’ Club grants permission to use, copy, and distribute this document delivered from this World Wide Web server with the following conditions: • The document will not be edited or abridged, and the material will be produced exactly as it appears. Modification of the material or use of it for any other purpose is a violation of our copyright and other proprietary rights. • Reproduction of this document is for free distribution and will not be sold. • This permission is granted for a one-time distribution. • All copies, links, or pages of the documents must carry the following copyright notice and this permission notice: Saturday Walkers’ Club, Copyright © 2014-2019, used with permission. All rights reserved. www.walkingclub.org.uk This walk has been checked as noted above, however the publisher cannot accept responsibility for any problems encountered by readers. Sawbridgeworth to Bishop’s Stortford (via Henry Moore Foundation) Start: Sawbridgeworth Station Finish: Bishop’s Stortford station Sawbridgeworth Station, map reference TL 490 150, is 6 km south of Bishop’s Stortford, and 48m above sea level. Bishop’s Stortford Station, map reference TL 491 208, is 43 km northeast of Charing X and 61m above sea level.
  • ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement Files Still Open Pre 2015

    ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement Files Still Open Pre 2015

    ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement files still open Pre 2015 Reference Date Site Address Nature of Breach Comments Received E/08/0021/A 11/01/2008 Hecc sport Cricket Centre The erection of an unauthorised industrial NOTICE Awaiting compliance with Tharbies Farm style link building and the unauthorised the OpDev and LB Rook End material change of use from agricultural to a enforcement notices. Jan High Wych cricket school 2017 Sawbridgeworth Hertfordshire CM21 0LL E/09/0018/B 15/01/2009 A site in Fore Street Unauthorised alteration works and neglect of a Planning permission Hertford Grade II Listed Building granted for refurbishment. Hertfordshire Continuing to monitor. E/10/0010/A 15/01/2010 Esbies Estate, Station Road, Various unauthorised structures changes of Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY use of untidy sites E/10/0010/A10 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Operational development without planning NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 permission the laying of hard surfacing 9JY E/10/0010/A11 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Material change of use of the site for the NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 storage of mobile homes, the parking of motor 9JY vehicles to inlcude lorries, vans and trailers, and the storage of plant and machinery and gas bottles. E/10/0010/A12 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the laying of hard NOTICE Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY srufacing; the construction of a porch structure to the front of a mobile home; and the erection of a light column E/10/0010/A13 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the siting of NOTICE Considering Legal action.
  • Examination in to the Soundess of the East Herts District Plan 2011-2033 Hearing Statement by J. C. G. Trower Chapter 11 –

    Examination in to the Soundess of the East Herts District Plan 2011-2033 Hearing Statement by J. C. G. Trower Chapter 11 –

    EXAMINATION IN TO THE SOUNDESS OF THE EAST HERTS DISTRICT PLAN 2011-2033 HEARING STATEMENT BY J. C. G. TROWER CHAPTER 11 – THE GILSTON AREA WEDNESDAY 8TH NOVEMBER 2017 My response is set out by way of an introduction, providing background as to why I am responding, and the answers to the Inspector’s questions in the order which she asked them. Introduction My wife and I own and farm Stanstead Bury, a neighbouring listed Park and Garden which will be severely impacted by policies GA1 and GA2. We own 11 listed buildings at Stanstead Bury and are the principal custodians of a further 7. We farm the land linking 2 of only 15 SSSI’s in the District and we are heavily committed to Environmental Stewardship Schemes across our land. We provide commercial lets for 14 small businesses and high quality residential units, the majority of which are let to young families and essential workers (including a police constable, an employee of the Environment Agency and an HCC social worker). I have lived in the area for most of my life and know it exceptionally well. I work as a corporate financier in the City of London advising publicly listed and privately owned companies. I therefore have some understanding of the realities of commercial life. I am a past High Sheriff of Hertfordshire, the Chairman of the Baesh Almshouse Trust, the Friends of St James Church and the Essex and Herts Air Ambulance. I am involved with many other local and national charities. My wife is Vice Chairman of the Stanstead Abbotts Parish Council, is a teacher and an environmentalist.