St JOSEPH's CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL Great Hadham Road
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 Entry)
Admissions Policy 2021-22 (September 2021 entry) Author: Mr R Newman Responsible Committee: Full Governing Body Ambition · Pride · Success Haileybury Turnford School Admission Arrangements for 2021-22 The school will have a published admission number of 182 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with an Education Health & Care Plan (EHCP) that names the school. If there are fewer applications than places available, all applicants will be offered a place. If there are more applications than places available, the criteria outlined below will be used to allocate applications. Rule 1 Looked After Children Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child’s arrangements order or a special guardianship order). Rule 2 Medical or Social Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school, which includes children previously abroad who were cared for by the state because he or she would not otherwise have been cared for adequately and subsequently adopted. A panel of HCC officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3 Sibling Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school. -
East Herts District Plan
East Herts District Plan Strategic March 2017 Land Availability Assessment 1.0 Introduction 1.1 National planning policy requires all Local Planning Authorities to produce a technical study known as the Strategic Land Availability Assessment (SLAA) in order to identify sites with potential for future development. The SLAA has informed work on the District Plan and Neighbourhood Planning. It has also assisted with the identification of future land supply. 1.2 The SLAA is a ‘live’ document in that it should be updated on a regular basis in order to reflect changing circumstances. Therefore, this version of the SLAA presents the most up to date position as at March 2017. 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Paragraphs 019 to 021 of the PPG identify that, when undertaking a SLAA, sites should be considered against three criteria, namely; suitability, availability and achievability. These terms are explained below. Suitability The assessment of suitability takes into account a range of policy constraints. These include environmental and heritage designations, impact on landscape and character, flooding and Green Belt / Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Availability A site is considered to be available if there are no legal or ownership issues which would prevent the site coming forward for development. Achievability Achievability is effectively a judgement about the economic viability of a site, and the capacity of the developer to complete the development over a certain period of time. 2.2 Having assessed each site against the three criteria, a conclusion can be reached. If a site is considered to be suitable, available and achievable, then it is regarded as being ‘deliverable’. -
Settlement Appraisal Gilston Area 1. History 1.1 the Supporting Document Records the Various Stages of Assessment That Were Un
Gilston Area Settlement Appraisal Settlement Appraisal Gilston Area 1. History 1.1 The Supporting Document records the various stages of assessment that were undertaken to inform the Preferred Options District Plan. It therefore provides an essential background to this Settlement Appraisal. In particular, Chapters 4 to 6 of the Supporting Document explained the process of shortlisting or ‘sieving’ options or ‘Areas of Search’. 1.2 On the basis of the assessments contained within the Supporting Document, and the rest of the evidence base that was available at that time, land to the north of Harlow, known as ‘the Gilston Area’ was identified as a preferred location for development. However, given the size and complexity of the site, and the need for the Council to gather further evidence regarding deliverability, the Gilston Area was not proposed for allocation at that stage. Instead, the Preferred Options District Plan identified it as a ‘Broad Location for Development’ for the delivery of between 5,000 and 10,000 new homes, both within this plan period and beyond, along with a range of supporting infrastructure such as new roads, primary and secondary schools, health centres and public open space. 1.3 Given the uncertainty of delivery at that time, and the need to undertake comprehensive masterplanning work, it was proposed that a separate Development Plan Document (DPD) be prepared following adoption of the District Plan in order to allocate the site. The DPD approach would set out the Council’s intention to deliver development during the latter part of the Plan period, and would enable further consideration of site boundaries, Green Belt boundaries and infrastructure requirements. -
Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan for CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1
September 19 Gilston Area Neighbourhood Plan FOR CONSULTATION DRAFT 1.1 HUNSDON EASTWICK AND GILSTON NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN GROUP Contents 1. Introduction to the Neighbourhood Plan .......................................................... 5 Why have a Neighbourhood Plan? ............................................................................................ 5 Designation of the Neighbourhood Area .................................................................................. 7 Plan Preparation Process ............................................................................................................ 9 Scope of the Plan ......................................................................................................................... 9 Evidence Base .............................................................................................................................10 Key Community Concerns ........................................................................................................ 10 2. Planning Policy Framework ................................................................................... 13 What is Sustainable Development? .......................................................................................... 13 National Planning Policy Framework ....................................................................................... 14 Building Better, Building Beautiful Commission .....................................................................16 East Hertfordshire District Plan .............................................................................................. -
170221 05Dc Appendix A
Appendix A Hertfordshire County Council’s oversubscription criteria for secondary and upper community coeducational schools for 2018/19 Section 324 of the Education Act 1996 requires the governing bodies of all maintained schools to admit a child with a statement of special educational needs that names their school. Schools must also admit children with an EHC (Education, Health and Care) Plan that names the school. If there are fewer applications than places available at a school all applicants will be admitted. If there are more applications than places available, the criteria outlined below will be used to prioritise applications. Oversubscription criteria Rule 1: Children looked after and children who were previously looked after, but ceased to be so because they were adopted (or became subject to a child arrangements order or a special guardianship order)*. Rule 2: Medical or Social Children for whom it can be demonstrated that they have a particular medical or social need to go to the school*. A panel of officers will determine whether the evidence provided is sufficiently compelling to meet the requirements for this rule. The evidence must relate specifically to the school applied for under Rule 2 and must clearly demonstrate why it is the only school that can meet the child’s needs. Rule 3: Sibling Children who have a sibling at the school at the time of application, unless the sibling is in the last year of the normal age-range of the school*. Note: the ‘normal age range’ is the designated range for which the school provides, for example Years 7 to 11 in an 11-16 secondary school, Years 7 to 13 in an 11-18 school . -
ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement Files Still Open Pre 2015
ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER ‘B’ Enforcement files still open Pre 2015 Reference Date Site Address Nature of Breach Comments Received E/08/0021/A 11/01/2008 Hecc sport Cricket Centre The erection of an unauthorised industrial NOTICE Awaiting compliance with Tharbies Farm style link building and the unauthorised the OpDev and LB Rook End material change of use from agricultural to a enforcement notices. Jan High Wych cricket school 2017 Sawbridgeworth Hertfordshire CM21 0LL E/09/0018/B 15/01/2009 A site in Fore Street Unauthorised alteration works and neglect of a Planning permission Hertford Grade II Listed Building granted for refurbishment. Hertfordshire Continuing to monitor. E/10/0010/A 15/01/2010 Esbies Estate, Station Road, Various unauthorised structures changes of Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY use of untidy sites E/10/0010/A10 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Operational development without planning NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 permission the laying of hard surfacing 9JY E/10/0010/A11 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plots 26,27,28, Station Material change of use of the site for the NOTICE Considering Legal action. Road, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 storage of mobile homes, the parking of motor 9JY vehicles to inlcude lorries, vans and trailers, and the storage of plant and machinery and gas bottles. E/10/0010/A12 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the laying of hard NOTICE Considering Legal action. Sawbridgeworth, Herts, CM21 9JY srufacing; the construction of a porch structure to the front of a mobile home; and the erection of a light column E/10/0010/A13 13/07/2010 Esbies Estate, Plot 29, Station Road, Without planning permission the siting of NOTICE Considering Legal action. -
HCC Registry Ref: / / REGISTER of DEPOSITS
HCC Registry ref: / / REGISTER OF DEPOSITS - HIGHWAYS ACT 1980* x x - COMMONS ACT 2006* (* tick if applicable or specify N/A) DETAILS OF APPLICATION Date Application received in prescribed form 09/02/17 Date by which any subsequent highways 08/02/37 declaration must be lodged Plan 1 Parcel 1: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Hatfield and Essendon Address and postcode of buildings Hatfield Park on each piece of land subject to the Hatfield application to which a postcode has AL9 5NQ been assigned Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 251 085 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 2: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Essendon Address and postcode of buildings East of West End Lane on each piece of land subject to the Hatfield application to which a postcode has AL9 6AZ been assigned Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 260 080 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 3: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Hatfield Address and postcode of buildings Brewhouse Farm on each piece of land subject to the Wildhill Road application to which a postcode has Hatfield been assigned AL9 6DP Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) TL 257 065 for a point within the area of the land Parcel 4: District Welwyn & Hatfield Parish Essendon Address and postcode of buildings Essendon Hill on each piece of land subject to the Essendon application to which a postcode has Hatfield been assigned AL9 6AQ Nearest town/city to above Hatfield OS 6 figure Grid Reference(s) -
Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire
Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire Lodge Farm Little Hadham, Hertfordshire Much Hadham 1.5 miles, Bishops Stortford 5 miles (London Liverpool Street from 38 mins), M11 (Junction 8) 7.8 miles, Ware 9.5 miles, Stansted Airport 10 miles, Hertford 12.8 miles, Central London 35 miles, Cambridge 29 miles. (Distances and time approximate) A beautiful family house with guest/staff cottage, all-purpose recreation barn and rural views within 35 miles of London. Main House Entrance hall | Drawing room | Sitting room| Dining room | Kitchen / breakfast room| Family room | Utility room | Boot room | Cellar Principal bedroom with en suite bathroom | 5 further bedrooms | 2 bathrooms Cottage Kitchen/breakfast room| Sitting room| 2 bedrooms | Shower room Recreation barn Large all-purpose recreation area | Kitchen Outside Arable field| Woodland with pond | Swimming pool | Tennis court | Lawns | Terraces | Garaging | Outbuildings In all about 11.34 acres Bishop’s Stortford Country Department Bishop’s Stortford Country Department Chequers, 19 North Street 33 Margaret Street 26 North Street 55 Baker Street Bishop’s Stortford London Bishop’s Stortford London CM23 2LD W1G 0JD Herts CM23 2LW W1U 8AN Tel: +44 1279 756 801 Tel: +44 20 7075 2806 Tel: +44 1279 213 343 Tel: +44 20 7861 1114 jgodfrey tmphillips paddy.pritchard-gordon edward.welton @savills.com @savills.com @knightfrank.com @knightfrank.com savills.co.uk knightfrank.co.uk Situation Believed to have been built as a hunting lodge for the Bishop of London, Lodge Farm is in open countryside on the edge of Little Hadham, about 1.5 miles equidistant from Much Hadham and Standon, which provide local amenities such as a village store, post office, pub, primary school, doctor’s surgery, and garage whilst more comprehensive facilities are available in Ware 9 miles, Hertford 13 miles or Bishop’s Stortford 5 miles. -
10. East Hertfordshire District Council Development Control Committee – 22 May 2013 Items for Report and Noting
10. EAST HERTFORDSHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 22 MAY 2013 ITEMS FOR REPORT AND NOTING (A)APPEALS Director of Neighbourhood Services (Development Control) Application 3/11/1615/FP number: Recommendation: Permission refuse Level of Decision: Committee - 18-Apr-2012 Site: Land at, Farnham Road, Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 1JB Appellant: Ms Lisa Cordelle Lamprelle Prop. Change of use to horse grazing and fruit farm with new Development: site entrance and parking including the erection of 4no. polytunnels, field shelter and 1no. shed Appeal Decision Allowed Application 3/12/0135/FP number: Recommendation: Permission refuse Level of Decision: Delegated - 09-Apr-2012 Site: St Johns Street, Hertford, Herts, SG14 1RX Appellant: Mr N Cooper (Sandhill Homes) Prop. Addition of 2 metre high gated access to the front of the Development: site Appeal Decision Allowed Application 3/12/0184/FP number: Recommendation: Permission refuse Level of Decision: Delegated - 02-Oct-2012 Site: Barleycroft Works, Barleycroft End, Furneux Pelham, Herts, SG9 0LL Appellant: Mr Jan Boruch Prop. Change of use of agricultural land to create additional Development: external storage area within B8 use (storage or distribution) for existing wood recycling business, including re-grading of site levels, construction of landscaped bunds and surface water reservoir. Amendment to application in respect of a revised site area and supporting documents. Appeal Decision Dismissed Application 3/12/0207/FP number: Recommendation: Permission refuse Level of Decision: Delegated - 04-Apr-2012 Site: Panshanger House, Panshanger Lane, Hertfordshire, SG14 2TS Appellant: Mrs Jessica Tennet Prop. Construction of a new barn and demolition of two existing Development: barns Appeal Decision Allowed Application 3/12/0372/FP number: Recommendation: Permission refuse Level of Decision: Delegated - 27-Apr-2012 Site: The Old Lime Works, Farnham Road, Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 1JD Appellant: Mr Greg Rose (The Animal Rescue Charity) Prop. -
Examination in to the Soundess of the East Herts District Plan 2011-2033 Hearing Statement by J. C. G. Trower Chapter 11 –
EXAMINATION IN TO THE SOUNDESS OF THE EAST HERTS DISTRICT PLAN 2011-2033 HEARING STATEMENT BY J. C. G. TROWER CHAPTER 11 – THE GILSTON AREA WEDNESDAY 8TH NOVEMBER 2017 My response is set out by way of an introduction, providing background as to why I am responding, and the answers to the Inspector’s questions in the order which she asked them. Introduction My wife and I own and farm Stanstead Bury, a neighbouring listed Park and Garden which will be severely impacted by policies GA1 and GA2. We own 11 listed buildings at Stanstead Bury and are the principal custodians of a further 7. We farm the land linking 2 of only 15 SSSI’s in the District and we are heavily committed to Environmental Stewardship Schemes across our land. We provide commercial lets for 14 small businesses and high quality residential units, the majority of which are let to young families and essential workers (including a police constable, an employee of the Environment Agency and an HCC social worker). I have lived in the area for most of my life and know it exceptionally well. I work as a corporate financier in the City of London advising publicly listed and privately owned companies. I therefore have some understanding of the realities of commercial life. I am a past High Sheriff of Hertfordshire, the Chairman of the Baesh Almshouse Trust, the Friends of St James Church and the Essex and Herts Air Ambulance. I am involved with many other local and national charities. My wife is Vice Chairman of the Stanstead Abbotts Parish Council, is a teacher and an environmentalist. -
Csm 2018/19 13 Elstree and Borehamwood Town
ELSTREE AND BOREHAMWOOD TOWN COUNCIL (EBTC) COMMUNITY SAFETY MEETING (CSM) MINUTES of a meeting held at Fairway Hall, Brook Close, Borehamwood, WD6 5BT on Wednesday 27 March 2019 at 7.00pm Present: Cllr C Butchins (CSM Chairman - EBTC) (in the Chair) Cllr Mrs P Strack - EBTC Cllr S Rubner - EBTC D Sweeney (Watch Liaison Officer) Cllr P Choudhury - (Community Safety and Performance Portfolio Holder ) HBC Cllr J Newmark - HBC Cllr K Merchant - HBC S Alford - EBRA 4 additional Members of the Public H R O Jones - EBTC Town Clerk [Only those attending on behalf of an organisation and/or wishing their names to be included in the Minutes are recorded above.] Abbreviations: EBTC - Elstree and Borehamwood Town Council HBC - Hertsmere Borough Council HCC - Hertfordshire County Council EBRA - Elstree and Borehamwood Residents’ Association BETTA - Borehamwood and Elstree Twin Town Association 38. CHAIRMAN’S WELCOME AND HOUSEKEEPING NOTICES The Chairman, Cllr C Butchins, welcomed those present to the second Town Council organised CSM. 39. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE AND SUBSTITUTIONS Apologies for absence were received from Cllr Mrs S Parnell (EBTC), A Dismore AM (London Assembly: Barnet and Camden), Cllr T Hone (HCC), CI C Smith (Hertfordshire Constabulary) and Inspector M Bilsdon (Safer Neighbourhoods Inspector - Hertfordshire Constabulary). 40. DECLARATIONS OF COUNCILLORS' INTERESTS There were none. CSM 2018/19 13 41. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING It was RESOLVED that: the minutes of the meeting of 30 January 2019 be approved as a correct record and duly signed by the Chairman. 42. POLICING It was noted that, whilst prior apologies for absence had been received from CI C Smith (Hertfordshire Constabulary) and Inspector M Bilsdon (Safer Neighbourhoods Inspector - Hertfordshire Constabulary), representation had been anticipated at the meeting from PCSOs. -
An Analysis of the Gilston & Eastwick Parish Plan 2008 Survey Report
UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE STATISTICAL SERVICES AND CONSULTANCY UNIT An Analysis of The Gilston & Eastwick Parish Plan 2008 Survey Report commissioned by Gilston & Eastwick Parish Plan Steering Group Lindsey Kevan and Neil Spencer 26th October 2008 Introduction This report contains an analysis of responses obtained from the survey carried out for the Gilston & Eastwick Parish Plan in 2008. A full tabulation of responses can be found in the appendix. In the main body of the report, attention is drawn to certain questions that have elicited responses where respondents felt strongly about the issue of the question. It is anticipated that Gilston & Eastwick Parish Plan steering Group may wish to develop action points associated with these questions. However, members of the Steering Group are advised to examine all tables in the appendix, as highlighting of particular questions has been done without the expert local knowledge they possess. The survey was divided into several sections, each containing a number of questions. Below, we deal with each section highlighting responses to certain questions, as described above Population Question 1 Please tell us how many people in your household are in each of the following age groups: Table of People living in household Under Age Age Age Age Age Over 11 11-18 19-25 26-40 41-50 51-65 65 No. of 23 26 15 32 51 66 17 people Question 2 Are you planning to move in the next 10 years? Planning to move? Frequency Yes-to a smaller home 11 Yes-to a larger home 9 Not intending to move 34 Unsure 24 Missing Data 2 The table above indicates that 44% of respondents who answered the question are not intending to move whilst 26% are planning to move.