Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE ¿Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology by Mary Kathleen Dingeman-Cerda Dissertation Committee: Professor Rubén G. Rumbaut, Chair Professor Jennifer Lee Professor Susan Bibler Coutin 2014 © Mary Kathleen Dingeman-Cerda DEDICATION ‘Who are all those friends, all scattered like dry leaves?’ - Woody Guthrie "Deportee" (also known as Plane Wreck at Los Gatos) This dissertation is dedicated to all of the migrants whose lives are forgotten and voices are silenced by our contemporary deportation machinery. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii CURRICULUM VITAE xii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION CHAPTER 1 A Nation of Immigrants to Deportation Nation 1 The Deportation Regime 3 The Legal Construction of Immigrant ‘Illegality’ 6 The Construction of the Deportation Regime 10 A Regime in Decline? 21 Deportation and its Discontents 23 Overview of this Dissertation 27 CHAPTER 2 The Im-Possibilities of Return 35 Journeying, Looking Back, and the Pull toward the “Homeland” 39 Return Home as Im-Possible 41 Post-Deportation Homecomings 44 Return Migrant Embeddedness 50 A Model of Post-Deportation Embeddedness 52 Post-Deportation Trajectories 69 CHAPTER 3 The Salvadoran Case 71 The Context of Exit 74 The Context of Reception 88 Deportation of Salvadorans 96 The Context of Return 98 CHAPTER 4 Methods and Reflections 104 Data Collection 106 Negotiating Participation 109 iii Study Administration 112 The Negotiation of Difference 115 Risk, Uncertainty, and the Termination of Data Collection 119 Data Analysis 123 CHAPTER 5 Divergent Post-Deportation Trajectories 126 Portrait of the Sample 129 Three Key Post-Deportation Trajectories 140 CHAPTER 6 Hermano, Bienvenido a Casa 152 The Migratory Journey 153 Life in the U.S. 156 Ambivalent Returns 160 Societal Reception 162 Economic Embeddedness 167 Considering Return Migration 172 Hermanos Lejanos as Neoliberal Subjects 176 CHAPTER 7 Strangers in a Native Land 178 Forgetting, Remembering, and Emigrating 179 Establishing Home Amidst Deportability 185 Deportation as Exile, Return as Uncertain 187 Navigating a Foreign Land 192 Stigmatization and Racialization 196 Economic Embeddedness 202 Coping and Homemaking Strategies 207 CHAPTER 8 Living and Leaving La Vida Loca 215 Gang Avoidance 216 Gang Entry 222 Transitioning out of Gangs 231 CHAPTER 9 Discussion and Conclusion 239 The War on Immigration 240 Collateral Damage 242 Returning “Home” to El Salvador 248 Transnational Implications 254 Policy Recommendations 256 Limitations and Future Research 261 REFERENCES 265 iv APPENDIX A Structured Questionnaire 308 APPENDIX B Semi-Structured Interview Schedule 313 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Total Removals from the United States, 1892-2013 Figure 1.2 Removals and Returns from the U.S., 1927-2013 Figure 1.3 Estimates of U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Population, 1990-2012 Figure 2.1 Model of Post-Deportation Embeddedness Figure 3.1 Removals of Salvadorans from the U.S., 1993-2012 Figure 3.2 Reasons for Removal of Salvadorans from the U.S., 1993-2011 Figure 4.1 Location of Interviews with Salvadoran Deportees vi LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Total and Salvadoran Foreign-Born Populations, 1960-2010 Table 5.1 Migration Histories of Sample of Salvadoran Deportees Table 5.2 Criminal Histories of Sample of Salvadoran Deportees Table 5.3 Economic Resources of Sample of Salvadoran Deportees Table 5.4 Social Ties of Sample of Salvadoran Deportees Table 5.5 Children of Sample of Salvadoran Deportees vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation was a collaborative effort. It would not have been possible without the support of organizations and individuals in the United States and El Salvador that provided funding, access, mentorship, and support. Though the faults are my certainly own, this dissertation is as much theirs as mine. I am immensely grateful for their contributions. Critical research funding was provided in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant by the National Science Foundation, a Human Rights Fellowship through the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, and seed money from Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California, Los Angeles and the Centers for Global Peace and Conflict Studies and Law, Society, and Culture at the University of California, Irvine. Writing was made possible by the Fletcher Jones Foundation, the Division of Social Sciences, and the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Irvine. I am forever indebted to my mentors. I hit the jackpot when Rubén G. Rumbaut agreed to be my advisor. It was his work that first inspired my academic interest in migration. It was he who encouraged me when I timidly solicited opinions about tracking the experiences of deportees. He demonstrates to me that is possible to blend academia with an ardent passion for social justice. He has become my role model, my collaborator, and my cheerleader. He helped me to develop my confidence, my voice. He always encouraged me to carve my own professional identity rather than follow his path or any other scholar’s standards. Thank you, Rubén, for your sage advice and for your friendship. I would not have produced this project, or any future project, without you. Susan Bibler Coutin was also critically influential. Like many migrants represented in her work, I had no ties to El Salvador prior to graduate school. Susan introduced me to El Salvador and trained me in data collection and analysis. She invited me to shadow her on a series of focus groups she conducted with deported persons and later permitted me to use this data in this dissertation. She viii introduced me to many of her contacts who, in turn, provided me access to interviewees. She shared her interview schedule and her method of data analysis. She offered to co-author a book chapter, providing a model of efficient and effective collaboration. She listened and provided guidance as I navigated graduate school as a woman and a mother. She is an example that is possible to balance a successful career, a happy family, and personal wellness. Thank you, Susan. Numerous organizations also assisted with this project. El Centro de Intercambio y Solidaridad provided a homestay and Spanish and history lessons in El Salvador. It was through them that I met Cristy Ayala. Cristy provided access to deportees throughout the Salvadoran countryside. She transported me to interviews and shared knowledge about the history and dynamics of the communities we visited. She offered critical interpretation services during interviews with Spanish speakers. Cristy also conducted a series of seven interviews and transcribed ten interviews for me. Perhaps most importantly, Cristy provided me with friendship and a sense of belonging in a foreign world. Her assistance was indispensable and her generosity of heart is unforgettable. Other individuals provided me access to interviewees. They include Daniel Sharp and Alisa Daubenspeck of the Central American Resource Center of Los Angeles, Luis Perdomo of El Centro de Recursos Centroamericanos Internacional, Alex Sanchez and the staff of Homies Unidos Los Angeles and San Salvador, and Pastor Salvador Fierro of Alcance Victoria in San Salvador. Other gatekeepers included Elsa Ramos, Luiz del Rio, Sophia Delgado, and Roxanna Delgado. Many deported persons interviewed for this study also provided access to other interviewees. I greatly appreciate their willingness to share their stories. I hope this dissertation represents them well. A team of masters and undergraduate level research assistants provided assistance with interview transcriptions, data entry, and coding of interviews. Carlos Batres became the natural leader of the team. He transcribed interviews, coded data, and helped me develop insights for the ix project during meetings and lengthy email memos and conversations. Carlos’ involvement in the project granted me important ‘insider’ knowledge to Latino culture that would have otherwise been lacking. His interpretations of the data enriched my analysis beyond measure. I am incredibly thankful for his dedication and his friendship. Other members of the research team at various stages of the project included Melissa Mae Cruz, Jorge Antonio Cruz, Monica Sepulveda, Jennifer Trinh, Diana Guerrero, Julio Rosas, Vanessa Velador, Carol Linton, Katherine Carranza, and Emily McLaughlin. I am thankful to each of them for their unique contributions. Numerous scholars were influential in direct and indirect ways. Thank you to Jennifer Lee for serving on my dissertation committee, for providing helpful feedback, and for being a great example of an effective teacher. Thank you to Cynthia Feliciano for the generous feedback and for the reassurance that my project was additive to migration scholarship. Thank you also to Stanley Bailey for his feedback in an infant stage of the project. I am also indebted to Daniel Kanstroom for his pioneering work in post-deportation studies. His research was foundational for my thinking on this project and his encouragement motivated me to share my insights and continue working in the area. Thank you to the faculty, staff, and graduate students in the UCI Department of Sociology and School of Social Sciences. You all helped make this dissertation possible. Finally, I would like to thank my family. Mom and dad, you have always been my number one fans. You sacrificed in innumerable ways to make my dreams come to fruition. You never stopped supporting me. When the road was tough and it seemed like everything would unravel, you were always there to reassure and encourage me. Thank you, dad, for demonstrating to me what it means to follow a passion, build community, and live a life of conviction. Thank x you, mom, for always being a few steps ahead, looking out for my best interests, and being there when no one else suffices.
Recommended publications
  • Core Document Forming Part of the Reports of States Parties El Salvador
    United Nations HRI/CORE/SLV/2011 International Human Rights Distr.: General 12 November 2012 Instruments English Original: Spanish Core document forming part of the reports of States parties El Salvador* [5 January 2011] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.12-47562 (EXT) HRI/CORE/SLV/2011 Contents Paragraphs Page I. General information about the reporting State ........................................................ 1–136 3 A. Demographic, economic, social and cultural characteristics of the State ....... 1–54 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ................................. 55–136 15 II. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights................... 137–223 34 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms............................................ 137–140 34 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at national level............ 141–174 38 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at national level.......... 175–212 43 D. Reporting process at national level................................................................. 213–223 49 III. Information on non-discrimination and equality and effective remedies................ 224–247 50 A. Non-discrimination and equality..................................................................... 224–232 50 B. Effective remedies .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Diario 15 De Abril.Indd
    DIARIOREPUBLICA OFICIAL. DE EL- San SALVADOR Salvador, EN LA 15 AMERICA de Abril CENTRALde 2005. 11 DIARIO OFI CIAL DIRECTOR: Lic. René O. Santamaría C. TOMO Nº 367 SAN SALVADOR, VIERNES 15 DE ABRIL DE 2005 NUMERO 70 "La Dirección de la Imprenta Nacional hace del conocimiento que toda publicación en el Diario Ofi cial será literalmente conforme al documento original, por consiguiente los errores impresos en la publicación son de exclusiva responsabilidad de la persona o institución que lo presentó". (Arts. 21, 22 y 23 Reglamento de la Imprenta Nacional). S U M A R I O Pág. Pág. ORGANO EJECUTIVO Acuerdo No. 15-0293.- Cambio de denominación del Centro Escolar Hermón a CentroCONSULTA Escolar “Guillermo de Jesús Ramírez PRESIDENCIA DE LA REPUBLICA Carranza”. ................................................................................ 9 Acuerdo No. 128.- Se autoriza transferencia de fondos, a ORGANOLEGAL JUDICIAL favor de la Fundación Educando a un Salvadoreño................... 4 PARA CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA Acuerdos No. 129 y 130.- Se encomienda Despachos a Acuerdos Nos. 277-D, 278-D, 296-D, 346-D y 619-D.- funcionarios públicos. ............................................................... 4-5 Autorizaciones para el ejercicio de la profesión de abogado en SOLOtoda sus ramas. .......................................................................... 10-11 Acuerdos Nos. 133 y 134.-Se reconocen viáticos por el desempeño de misión ofi cial. .................................................... VALIDEZ 5 Acuerdos Nos. 96-D, 208-D, 409-D, 424-D, 427-D, 508-D, 519-D, y 535-D.- Autorizaciones para el ejercicio de la Función MINISTERIO DE HACIENDA Notarial; aumentándoseles en la nómina respectiva.................. 11-12 RAMO DE HACIENDA Acuerdo No. 252.- OperacionesOFICIAL de cargo y descargoTIENE del INSTITUCIONES AUTONOMAS “Programa de Apoyo a la Reconstrucción de El Salvador”......
    [Show full text]
  • PDR 38.1 Massey-COLOR.Indd 1 3/5/12 11:16:53 AM 2 U N I N T E N D E D Co N S E Q U E N C E S O F US Im M I G R a T I O N Po L I C Y
    Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America DOUGLAS S. MASSEY KAREN A. PREN THE YEAR 1965 is often cited as a turning point in the history of US immigra- tion, but what happened in the ensuing years is not well understood. Amend- ments to the Immigration and Nationality Act passed in that year repealed the national origins quotas, which had been enacted during the 1920s in a deliberate attempt to limit the entry of Southern and Eastern European immigrants—or more specifically Jews from the Russian Pale and Catholics from Poland and Italy, groups at the time deemed “unassimilable.” The quo- tas supplemented prohibitions already in place that effectively banned the entry of Asians and Africans. The 1965 amendments were intended to purge immigration law of its racist legacy by replacing the old quotas with a new system that allocated residence visas according to a neutral preference system based on family reunification and labor force needs.T he new system is widely credited with having sparked a shift in the composition of immigration away from Europe toward Asia and Latin America, along with a substantial increase in the number of immigrants. Indeed, after 1965 the number of immigrants entering the country did increase, and the flows did come to be dominated byA sians and Latin Ameri- cans. Although the amendments may have opened the door to greater im- migration from Asia, however, the surge in immigration from Latin America occurred in spite of rather than because of the new system. Countries in the Western Hemisphere had never been included in the national origins quotas, nor was the entry of their residents prohibited as that of Africans and Asians had been.
    [Show full text]
  • Report: the War on Drugs Meets Immigration
    REPORT: THE WAR ON DRUGS MEETS IMMIGRATION (a Drug Policy Alliance publication) Photo: Becker1999 via Flickr. Licensed under cc-by-2.0. INTRODUCTION THE FEDERAL STORY The United States simultaneously holds itself out as U.S. drug prohibition and exclusionary immigration a land of opportunity where “everyone” is welcome policies share a long and ignominious history grounded but also unjustly blames and demonizes certain in racially-based criminalization.1 The nation’s first immigrants for various societal problems. For over 100 restrictive immigration laws, the Page Act of 1875 and years, certain classes of immigrants have been falsely Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, drew heavily on negative associated with drug use and activity. The underlying public attitudes towards Chinese immigrants, including assumptions behind this tactic and resulting policies association with opium, to justify banning their entry are that immigrants, particularly immigrants of color, are into the country.2 In 1875, the same year as the Page dangerous, undesirable people who bring drugs into the Act, the city of San Francisco passed the country’s first country that harm U.S. citizens (read: white U.S. citizens); drug criminalization law, an ordinance prohibiting opium people who use drugs need to be removed from our dens, based on the false rationale that Chinese people communities, and when possible, country; and an were corrupting white people with opium.3 Marijuana immigrant cannot be a good community member if they and alcohol prohibition also have their roots in racist use drugs or have a criminal record. This mentality has anti-Black and anti-immigrant fervor with the frequent helped to create the world’s largest immigrant exclusion, blaming of drug trafficking on racialized outsiders and detention, and deportation apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study
    International Migration in Theory and Practice: A Case Study Douglas S. Massey Office of Population Research Princeton University Committee on South-North Migration, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population 1991-1996 • Constituted by IUSSP President Massimo Livi- Bacci and IUSSP Council • Charge: – Review prevailing theories of migration – Evaluate theories relative to empirical evidence – Create an integrated conceptual framework based on theoretical review and empirical evaluation Contents New Migrations New Theories 1 Contemporary Theories of International Migration 17 Understanding the North American System 60 Coming to Terms with European Immigration 108 Labour Migration in the Gulf System 134 Theory and Reality in Asia and the Pacific 160 International Migration in South America 196 International Migration and National Development 222 International Migration and Community Development 254 Conclusions for the Next Century 275 References 295 Prevailing Paradigms Circa 1990 • Neoclassical Economics – Macro: Ranis & Fei: Matching Labor Supply and Demand – Micro: Todaro: Theory of Income Maximization • New Economics of Labor Migration – Household strategies to manage risk, overcome market failures, and reduce relative deprivation • Segmented Labor Market Theory – Piore: Dual Labor Market Theory – Portes: Enclave Theory • World Systems Theory – Dependency Theory – Globalization and Global Cities • Social Capital Theory – Networks – Organizations – Cumulative Causation Foundations of Immigration Policy in Receiving Societies
    [Show full text]
  • 1 July 23, 2015 the Honorable Trey Gowdy Chairman Immigration And
    (Best Viewed With Bookmarks Showing) WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE July 23, 2015 The Honorable Trey Gowdy Chairman Immigration and Border Subcommittee Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Washington, D.C. 20510 WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE 915 15th STREET, NW, 6 TH FL The Honorable Zoe Lofgren WASHINGTON, DC 20005 Ranking Member T/202.544.1681 F/202.546.0738 Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee WWW.ACLU.ORG Committee on the Judiciary MICHAEL W. MACLEOD-BALL U.S. House of Representatives ACTING DIRECTOR Washington, D.C. 20510 NATIONAL OFFICE 125 BROAD STREET, 18 TH FL. RE: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security of the House Judiciary NEW YORK, NY 10004-2400 Committee Hearing on “Sanctuary Cities: A Threat to Public Safety” T/212.549.2500 OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Dear Chairman Gowdy and Ranking Member Lofgren: SUSAN N. HERMAN PRESIDENT The American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) submits this statement to the ANTHONY D. ROMERO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR House Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee for the hearing: “Sanctuary Cities: A Threat to Public Safety.” This hearing raises ROBERT REMAR constitutional questions about the legality of immigration detainers as well as critical TREASURER policy issues concerning community policing and public safety. The ACLU has been our nation’s guardian of liberty, working in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. The ACLU takes up the toughest civil liberties cases and issues to defend all people from government abuse and overreach.
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Resource on Anti-Deportation Education and Organizing
    DEPORTATION 101 A Community Resource on Anti-Deportation Education and Organizing Revised May 2010 Produced by Detention Watch Network 1325 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 Families for Freedom 3 W 29th St, Suite 1030 New York, NY 10001 Immigrant Defense Project 3 W 29th St, Suite 803 New York, NY 10001 National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild 14 Beacon St, Suite 602 Boston, MA 02108 THE DEPORTATION 101 CURRICULUM A Little History The Immigrant Defense Project (IDP) and Families for Freedom (FFF) originally developed the Deportation 101 curriculum in 2005. In 2007, the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild and Deten- tion Watch Network began collaborating with IDP and FFF to create an expanded curriculum and to present additional trainings. Together, the Deportation 101 team has partnered with community-based groups to train directly affected peo- ple, organizers, and service providers in various parts of the country, including New York, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, Georgia, Maryland, Virginia, District of Columbia, North Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missis- sippi, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. About the Curriculum Deportation 101 is an intensive, one to two-day training, accompanied by comprehensive written materials, that offers basics on the detention and deportation system and provides guidance on how to organize com- munities directly impacted by deportation. Created by community organizers, legal experts, and
    [Show full text]
  • Dirección De Posgrados Y Educación Continua
    Dirección de Posgrados y Educación Continua Maestría en Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje Asignatura: Proyecto de Intervención Título del proyecto: “El Salvador: Historia del siglo XX Estrategias de enseñanza” Elaborado por: Saraí Beatriz Márquez López Tutor del proyecto: Mariela Delauro Año: 2020 1 ÍNDICE Resumen Técnico ............................................................................................................. 3 PROPUESTA DEL PROYECTO ........................................................................................... 4 1. El problema ................................................................................................................ 5 La justificación ............................................................................................................... 5 Contexto del problema ................................................................................................... 6 2. Prospectiva ................................................................................................................ 7 3. Propuesta Pedagógica ............................................................................................... 8 4. Objetivos .................................................................................................................... 9 Objetivo general: ............................................................................................................ 9 Objetivos específicos: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Political and Cultural History of Power and the Dialectics
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Reframing Salvadoran Modernity: A Political and Cultural History of Power and the Dialectics of the Hegemonic Bloc in El Salvador, ca. 1850-1944 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Raúl Ernesto Moreno Campos 2015 © Copyright by Raúl Ernesto Moreno Campos 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Reframing Salvadoran Modernity: A Political and Cultural History of Power and the Dialectics of the Hegemonic Bloc in El Salvador, ca. 1850-1944 by Raul Ernesto Moreno Campos Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Raymond A. Rocco, Chair This dissertation analyzes the development, relationship, and intersection of the economic-political and cultural-intellectual axes that defined modernity in El Salvador roughly from the period of 1850 to the end of the General Maximiliano Hernández Martínez’s regime in 1944 and examines the manner in which this historical process shaped the contours of power in Salvadoran society. Using an interdisciplinary methodology and drawing from a variety of archival sources, my study frames the concept of modernity from the perspective of post-colonial societies and the Global South and reframes prevailing analyses of Salvadoran economic and political development by interrogating dominant narratives of underdevelopment, state violence, and facile understandings of political consent. Hence, the central problematic that organizes this study is explaining the process by which the constellation of leading classes within the axes of economic-political and cultural-intellectual activity, who were manifestly in tension by pitting the forces of modernization against the modernist movement, amalgamated into a coherent group ii under the leadership of the military regime in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Criminalization Under Operation Streamline: Challenges to Freedom of Movement and Humanitarian Aid Provision in the Mexico-US Borderlands
    Volume 26 Refuge Number 2 Differential Criminalization under Operation Streamline: Challenges to Freedom of Movement and Humanitarian Aid Provision in the Mexico-US Borderlands Andrew Burridge Abstract visant l’incarcération massive des sans-papiers afin de On January 14, 2008, under the wider program of réduire les tentatives répétées de migration a été le plus the Arizona Denial Prosecution Initiative, Operation rigoureusement appliquée dans le secteur Tucson, couloir Streamline was put into effect in the Tucson Sector of the migratoire ayant la réputation d’être le plus achalandé et le Mexico-US borderlands . Initially implemented in Del plus meurtrier . Chaque jour, environ soixante-dix migrants Rio, Texas, this program—aimed at mass incarceration sont appréhendés par la US Border Patrol, puis condamnés of undocumented persons to reduce repeated migration à un maximum de 180 jours d’emprisonnement . L’auteur attempts—has been most rigorously applied in the Tucson considère le programme « Operation Streamline » et ses Sector, known as both the busiest and deadliest corridor for impacts sur les sans-papiers à travers le prisme de l’organi- migration . Every day approximately seventy migrants are sation locale, en particulier du groupe d’aide humanitaire apprehended by the US Border Patrol and then sentenced No More Deaths, affirmant que de telles politiques, qui for up to 180 days imprisonment . I consider Operation militarisent davantage la frontière et justifient la crimina- Streamline and its impacts on undocumented migrants lisation des migrants au yeux du grand public, exposent les through the lens of local organizing, particularly by the sans-papiers à un risque accru, avant même qu’ils soient humanitarian aid group No More Deaths, asserting that traduits en justice, à travers des pratiques de confinement such policies—which further militarize the border and jus- spatial qui ajoutent aux rigueurs de la traversée du désert tify criminalization of migrants in the public eye—put bod- de Sonora .
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of the American Immigration Council
    STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL SUBMITTED TO THE U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING ENTITLED "OVERSIGHT OF UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT" September 16, 2016 Contact: Royce Bernstein Murray, 1331 G Street, NW, Suite 200 Director of Policy Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Fax: 202/742-5619 Phone: 202/507-7510 The American Immigration Council (Immigration Council) is a non-profit organization which for over 25 years has been dedicated to increasing public understanding of immigration law and policy and the role of immigration in American society. We write to share our analysis and research regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and its impact on immigrants and their communities. We share in the Committee’s interest in engaging in oversight of ICE and holding the agency accountable for their enforcement actions and treatment of immigrants in their custody. While the Immigration Council provides research and analysis on a range of related issues, we call to the Committee’s attention our concerns about overbroad enforcement actions and detention of asylum seekers and families. The Immigration Council’s publications on these critical issues should serve to inform the Committee’s assessment of ICE’s work in these areas and provide discrete areas in need of a policy or procedural shift. Overbroad Enforcement: While we welcomed the Administration’s revisiting of enforcement priorities in 2014, the revised priorities remain overbroad, resulting in the placement of immigrants with old or minor criminal convictions into removal proceedings. ICE’s Criminal Alien Program (CAP) has become the primary channel through which interior immigration enforcement takes place; between two-thirds and three-quarters of individuals removed from the interior of the United States are removed through CAP.
    [Show full text]
  • US Interference in El Salvador, The
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Spring 2019 Unintended consequences: U.S. interference in El Salvador, the Salvadoran Diaspora, and the role of activist community organizations in establishing a Salvadoran-American community in Los Angeles Blake Bergstrom James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, International Relations Commons, Latin American History Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Political History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Bergstrom, Blake, "Unintended consequences: U.S. interference in El Salvador, the Salvadoran Diaspora, and the role of activist community organizations in establishing a Salvadoran-American community in Los Angeles" (2019). Masters Theses. 606. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/606 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unintended Consequences: U.S. Interference in El Salvador, the Salvadoran Diaspora, and the Role of Activist Community Organizations in Establishing a Transnational Salvadoran-American Community in Los Angeles Blake Bergstrom A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History May 2019 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Kristen McCleary Committee Members: Michael Gubser William Van Norman Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my wonderful parents, Gunnar and Liz, who have given me endless encouragement, support, and love throughout all of my pursuits.
    [Show full text]