DOCSLIB.ORG

Securing Our Borders: Post 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COVER 3 5 4/21/05 9:11 AM Page 1 SECURING OUR BORDERS: SECURING OUR BORDERS: POST 9/11 SCAPEGOATING OF IMMIGRANTS SCAPEGOATING POST 9/11 POST 9/11 SCAPEGOATING OF IMMIGRANTS SCAPEGOATING POST 9/11 FiAC# FLORIDA Prepared by IMMIGRANT Cheryl Little and Kathie Klarreich FIAC FIAC ADVOCACY CENTER April 2005 FIAC Securing Our Borders: Post 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants Table of Contents I Executive Summary . 1 II Persons Fleeing Persecution A. Introduction . 13 B. Electric Monitoring Devices . 15 C. Criminal Prosecution of Asylum Seekers Arriving with False Documents . 23 D. Haitian Asylum Seekers . 28 III Multiple Ways Police Are Doing Immigration Work A. Introduction . 47 B. Florida Department of Law Enforcement Pilot Program . 50 C. Police Cooperation with Immigration Authorities . 54 IV The Impact of Federal Agents Taking People Into Custody A. Introduction . 65 B. Operation Endgame . 68 C. Operation Compliance . 76 D. Operation Tarmac . 77 E. Judicial Intervention . 78 V Driver’s Licenses . 83 VI South Asian, Muslim and Arab Immigrants A. Introduction . 97 B. Secret Hearings . 100 C. Treatment of South Asian, Muslim and Arab Asylum Seekers . 103 D. Roundups . 109 E. Special Registration . 115 F. Impact on Students . 120 G. Discrimination . 121 VII Conclusions and Recommendations . 135 v FIAC Securing Our Borders: Post 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants Executive Summary I Executive Summary “Many undocumented workers have walked mile after mile, through the heat of the day and the cold of the night.... Workers who seek only to earn a living end up in the shadows of American life—fearful, often abused and exploited. America is a stronger and better nation because of the hard work and the faith and entrepreneurial spirit of immigrants.” President George W. Bush January 2004 or more than two centuries, the United rights of all immigrants. FIAC offers direct States has provided shelter and refuge to legal representation in immigration and public F countless victims of persecution, giving benefits law, and also engages in impact hope to millions of people who have had advocacy to address broad patterns of abuse. nowhere else to turn. But in the aftermath of For the general public, “Securing Our September 11, 2001, our government has Borders” is a valuable educational tool that reversed this proud tradition, sending waves of illustrates the degree to which our anti- fear over those in need of protection and terrorism measures are counter-intuitive. For shocking those who cherish the principles advocates, lawmakers and other concerned upon which our country was founded. individuals who can lobby for change, this “Securing Our Borders: Post- report provides a comprehensive 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants,” look at policies and practices that demonstrates the extent to which “[Immigration officials need improvement. Moreover, it our post 9/11 policies are mis- have] been given far provides a platform for thousands aligned, how they have driven us too many mandates in of immigrants who have been further from our goal of providing unable to speak for themselves. too short a period of national security and how severely Besides offering specific examples they have impacted our commu- time without a lot of the devastating impact of our nity. Individually, each new policy of resources to do it policies on individuals and the and/or law that the Bush admini- and without a real community, this report also stration applied with the intent strategic vision for offers recommendations and of strengthening our borders, how immigration suggestions for policy changes to controlling the immigration enforcement and ensure that our safety and our flow and improving our databases basic civil rights remains intact. anti-terrorism should is having a devastating effect; As a response to the collectively their force is really work together unprecedented horror of overwhelming. effectively.” September 11, 2001, and in This report is produced by Doris Meissner, former keeping with the tradition of Florida Immigrant Advocacy INS Commissioner, protecting our nation and its Center (FIAC), a non-profit legal February 2003 citizens, our government has firm that advocates for the human tightened existing laws and 1 FIAC Securing Our Borders: Post 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants Executive Summary implemented a series of new securing safe haven. Florida’s ones to make certain that such a “Miami is often the test Haitian population, in particular, tragedy never happens again. But case for the rest of the was severely impacted when the in so doing, it has also eroded federal government secretly some of the core principles that country when it comes changed its policy to keep Haitian provide the foundation for our to immigration and asylum seekers who arrived in democracy and way of life. “It is refugee policies, and Florida in detention for purposes during our most challenging and often what we see of “national security.” And, if uncertain moments that our beginning in Miami asylum seekers arrive with false Nation’s commitment to due spreads to the rest of documents, the U.S. Attorney’s process is most severely tested,” the country.” offices in South Florida prosecute, said Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. (jeopardizing their ability to gain “It would indeed be ironic if, in Wendy Young, Director of asylum) so that even those who Government Relations and the name of national defense, we U.S. Programs, Women’s eventually receive asylum have a would sanction the subversion Commission for Refugee criminal record. Miami was also of one of those liberties which Women and Children, one of three cities nationwide to make the defense of the nation August 2003 implement a pilot program of worthwhile.”4 using electronic monitoring President Bush’s War on Terror devices for asylum seekers. It has transgressed into a War on Immigrants, also implemented and then modified, by including those asylum seekers fleeing terror. putting on hold, another pilot program, Nowhere is this criminalization of immigrants Operation Compliance. This program assigns felt more acutely than in Florida, home to the officers to immigration courts and asylum nation’s third highest immigration population. offices, with the express role of promptly Florida is the nation’s testing ground for arresting people who emerge from court after anti-immigrant measures and enforcement losing their civil cases and before they can ideas; much of what happens in Florida has a begin an appeals process. rippling effect nationally. Florida was at the After September 11, Middle Eastern forefront in enacting post 9/11 anti-immigrant detainees around the country, including those measures and was the first state to deputize in Florida, were also subjected to round-ups, police to act as immigration officials. Florida special registrations and secret hearings, in changed the procedure for its citizens to addition to prolonged detention at facilities acquire driver’s licenses, unduly punishing even like the federally run Krome Service Processing those immigrants with legal and valid visas. Center in southwest Miami-Dade County. Immigrants, mainly from Central and South Additionally, a bill repeatedly introduced in the America and the Caribbean, found themselves Florida Legislature in each of the past three affected by deliberate and random round-ups years—that has failed to pass—would disallow by police, who turned them over to state scholarship and financial aid for all non- immigration authorities. Immigrants and resident university students from countries advocates in Florida also complain about suspected of harboring terrorists. increased sweeps by Border Patrol agents, who These policies have done nothing to they claim engage in racial profiling. What’s advance the War on Terror. They have not more, a Florida Senate panel endorsed a yielded a single terrorist in Florida. But they proposal to make it far more difficult for non- have distressed and unsettled the lives of citizens to get married. hundreds of thousands of hard-working, Asylum seekers across the country, but honest immigrants—immigrants who are our specifically in Florida, now find themselves friends, our physicians, teachers, gardeners and entangled in a web of laws, both new and favorite performers. Furthermore, these ill- reformed, which greatly reduces their chance of conceived policies have increased some 2 FIAC Securing Our Borders: Post 9/11 Scapegoating of Immigrants Executive Summary people’s suspicion of authority and driven evidence without final charges in deportations, them further underground, which in turn called for the expedited removal and manda- hinders, rather than bolsters, national security. tory detention of innocent asylum seekers Various government officials believe that arriving at ports-of-entry like Miami (except these reforms may be threatening our security. Cubans), mandated the detention and Vincent Cannistraro, former head of counter- deportation of non-citizens with even very terrorism at the CIA, said: “The idea that you old minor criminal convictions (that were only stigmatize whole classes of people and profile misdemeanors at the time and not grounds them because you think it’s going to prevent for deportation), restricted immigrants’ access the next terrorist attack is exactly the wrong to counsel, and barred them from appealing way to go about it.”5 Then Department of to the courts.10 Homeland Security Undersecretary, Asa Following the implementation of these Hutchinson testified in August 2004 that laws, the number of persons
Recommended publications
  • PDR 38.1 Massey-COLOR.Indd 1 3/5/12 11:16:53 AM 2 U N I N T E N D E D Co N S E Q U E N C E S O F US Im M I G R a T I O N Po L I C Y

    PDR 38.1 Massey-COLOR.Indd 1 3/5/12 11:16:53 AM 2 U N I N T E N D E D Co N S E Q U E N C E S O F US Im M I G R a T I O N Po L I C Y

    Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America DOUGLAS S. MASSEY KAREN A. PREN THE YEAR 1965 is often cited as a turning point in the history of US immigra- tion, but what happened in the ensuing years is not well understood. Amend- ments to the Immigration and Nationality Act passed in that year repealed the national origins quotas, which had been enacted during the 1920s in a deliberate attempt to limit the entry of Southern and Eastern European immigrants—or more specifically Jews from the Russian Pale and Catholics from Poland and Italy, groups at the time deemed “unassimilable.” The quo- tas supplemented prohibitions already in place that effectively banned the entry of Asians and Africans. The 1965 amendments were intended to purge immigration law of its racist legacy by replacing the old quotas with a new system that allocated residence visas according to a neutral preference system based on family reunification and labor force needs.T he new system is widely credited with having sparked a shift in the composition of immigration away from Europe toward Asia and Latin America, along with a substantial increase in the number of immigrants. Indeed, after 1965 the number of immigrants entering the country did increase, and the flows did come to be dominated byA sians and Latin Ameri- cans. Although the amendments may have opened the door to greater im- migration from Asia, however, the surge in immigration from Latin America occurred in spite of rather than because of the new system. Countries in the Western Hemisphere had never been included in the national origins quotas, nor was the entry of their residents prohibited as that of Africans and Asians had been.
  • Report: the War on Drugs Meets Immigration

    Report: the War on Drugs Meets Immigration

    REPORT: THE WAR ON DRUGS MEETS IMMIGRATION (a Drug Policy Alliance publication) Photo: Becker1999 via Flickr. Licensed under cc-by-2.0. INTRODUCTION THE FEDERAL STORY The United States simultaneously holds itself out as U.S. drug prohibition and exclusionary immigration a land of opportunity where “everyone” is welcome policies share a long and ignominious history grounded but also unjustly blames and demonizes certain in racially-based criminalization.1 The nation’s first immigrants for various societal problems. For over 100 restrictive immigration laws, the Page Act of 1875 and years, certain classes of immigrants have been falsely Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, drew heavily on negative associated with drug use and activity. The underlying public attitudes towards Chinese immigrants, including assumptions behind this tactic and resulting policies association with opium, to justify banning their entry are that immigrants, particularly immigrants of color, are into the country.2 In 1875, the same year as the Page dangerous, undesirable people who bring drugs into the Act, the city of San Francisco passed the country’s first country that harm U.S. citizens (read: white U.S. citizens); drug criminalization law, an ordinance prohibiting opium people who use drugs need to be removed from our dens, based on the false rationale that Chinese people communities, and when possible, country; and an were corrupting white people with opium.3 Marijuana immigrant cannot be a good community member if they and alcohol prohibition also have their roots in racist use drugs or have a criminal record. This mentality has anti-Black and anti-immigrant fervor with the frequent helped to create the world’s largest immigrant exclusion, blaming of drug trafficking on racialized outsiders and detention, and deportation apparatus.
  • A Case Study

    A Case Study

    International Migration in Theory and Practice: A Case Study Douglas S. Massey Office of Population Research Princeton University Committee on South-North Migration, International Union for the Scientific Study of Population 1991-1996 • Constituted by IUSSP President Massimo Livi- Bacci and IUSSP Council • Charge: – Review prevailing theories of migration – Evaluate theories relative to empirical evidence – Create an integrated conceptual framework based on theoretical review and empirical evaluation Contents New Migrations New Theories 1 Contemporary Theories of International Migration 17 Understanding the North American System 60 Coming to Terms with European Immigration 108 Labour Migration in the Gulf System 134 Theory and Reality in Asia and the Pacific 160 International Migration in South America 196 International Migration and National Development 222 International Migration and Community Development 254 Conclusions for the Next Century 275 References 295 Prevailing Paradigms Circa 1990 • Neoclassical Economics – Macro: Ranis & Fei: Matching Labor Supply and Demand – Micro: Todaro: Theory of Income Maximization • New Economics of Labor Migration – Household strategies to manage risk, overcome market failures, and reduce relative deprivation • Segmented Labor Market Theory – Piore: Dual Labor Market Theory – Portes: Enclave Theory • World Systems Theory – Dependency Theory – Globalization and Global Cities • Social Capital Theory – Networks – Organizations – Cumulative Causation Foundations of Immigration Policy in Receiving Societies
  • What They're Saying: JASTA

    What They're Saying: JASTA

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 03/30/2017 6:31:12 PM What They’re Saying: JASTA JASTA and its effect on U.S. National Security The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA), vetoed by President Obama but overridden on September 28, 2016 by the U.S. Congress, is now law. This legislation will likely trigger a chain of unin­ tended and harmful consequences and is already leading to foreign lawsuits against the U.S., which could ultimately implicate U.S. personnel serving abroad. The legislation passed by Congress has received widespread opposition from the country’s top defense and national security leaders and our military veterans. Administration & National Security Leaders: Defense Secretary Ash Carter i September 26,2016 “Allowing our partners and allies—not just designated state sponsors of terrorism—to be subject to lawsuits inside the United States will inevitably undermine the trust and cooperation our forces need to accomplish their important missions. By damaging our close and effective cooperation with other countries, this could ultimately have a chilling effect on our own counterterrorism efforts.” Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford i September 28,2016 “Any legislation that risks reciprocal treatment by foreign governments would increase the vulnerability of U.S. Service members to foreign legal action while acting in an official capacity.” CIA Director John Brennan i September 28,2016 “I believe JASTA will have grave implications for the national security of the United States. The
  • 1 July 23, 2015 the Honorable Trey Gowdy Chairman Immigration And

    1 July 23, 2015 the Honorable Trey Gowdy Chairman Immigration And

    (Best Viewed With Bookmarks Showing) WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE July 23, 2015 The Honorable Trey Gowdy Chairman Immigration and Border Subcommittee Committee on the Judiciary U.S. House of Representatives AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Washington, D.C. 20510 WASHINGTON LEGISLATIVE OFFICE 915 15th STREET, NW, 6 TH FL The Honorable Zoe Lofgren WASHINGTON, DC 20005 Ranking Member T/202.544.1681 F/202.546.0738 Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee WWW.ACLU.ORG Committee on the Judiciary MICHAEL W. MACLEOD-BALL U.S. House of Representatives ACTING DIRECTOR Washington, D.C. 20510 NATIONAL OFFICE 125 BROAD STREET, 18 TH FL. RE: Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security of the House Judiciary NEW YORK, NY 10004-2400 Committee Hearing on “Sanctuary Cities: A Threat to Public Safety” T/212.549.2500 OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Dear Chairman Gowdy and Ranking Member Lofgren: SUSAN N. HERMAN PRESIDENT The American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) submits this statement to the ANTHONY D. ROMERO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR House Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee of the Judiciary Committee for the hearing: “Sanctuary Cities: A Threat to Public Safety.” This hearing raises ROBERT REMAR constitutional questions about the legality of immigration detainers as well as critical TREASURER policy issues concerning community policing and public safety. The ACLU has been our nation’s guardian of liberty, working in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country. The ACLU takes up the toughest civil liberties cases and issues to defend all people from government abuse and overreach.
  • A Community Resource on Anti-Deportation Education and Organizing

    A Community Resource on Anti-Deportation Education and Organizing

    DEPORTATION 101 A Community Resource on Anti-Deportation Education and Organizing Revised May 2010 Produced by Detention Watch Network 1325 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20005 Families for Freedom 3 W 29th St, Suite 1030 New York, NY 10001 Immigrant Defense Project 3 W 29th St, Suite 803 New York, NY 10001 National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild 14 Beacon St, Suite 602 Boston, MA 02108 THE DEPORTATION 101 CURRICULUM A Little History The Immigrant Defense Project (IDP) and Families for Freedom (FFF) originally developed the Deportation 101 curriculum in 2005. In 2007, the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild and Deten- tion Watch Network began collaborating with IDP and FFF to create an expanded curriculum and to present additional trainings. Together, the Deportation 101 team has partnered with community-based groups to train directly affected peo- ple, organizers, and service providers in various parts of the country, including New York, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, Georgia, Maryland, Virginia, District of Columbia, North Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana, Missis- sippi, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia. About the Curriculum Deportation 101 is an intensive, one to two-day training, accompanied by comprehensive written materials, that offers basics on the detention and deportation system and provides guidance on how to organize com- munities directly impacted by deportation. Created by community organizers, legal experts, and
  • Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation

    Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE ¿Bienvenidos a Casa? Deportation and the Making of Home in the U.S.-El Salvador Transnation DISSERTATION Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Sociology by Mary Kathleen Dingeman-Cerda Dissertation Committee: Professor Rubén G. Rumbaut, Chair Professor Jennifer Lee Professor Susan Bibler Coutin 2014 © Mary Kathleen Dingeman-Cerda DEDICATION ‘Who are all those friends, all scattered like dry leaves?’ - Woody Guthrie "Deportee" (also known as Plane Wreck at Los Gatos) This dissertation is dedicated to all of the migrants whose lives are forgotten and voices are silenced by our contemporary deportation machinery. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES vi LIST OF TABLES vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii CURRICULUM VITAE xii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION CHAPTER 1 A Nation of Immigrants to Deportation Nation 1 The Deportation Regime 3 The Legal Construction of Immigrant ‘Illegality’ 6 The Construction of the Deportation Regime 10 A Regime in Decline? 21 Deportation and its Discontents 23 Overview of this Dissertation 27 CHAPTER 2 The Im-Possibilities of Return 35 Journeying, Looking Back, and the Pull toward the “Homeland” 39 Return Home as Im-Possible 41 Post-Deportation Homecomings 44 Return Migrant Embeddedness 50 A Model of Post-Deportation Embeddedness 52 Post-Deportation Trajectories 69 CHAPTER 3 The Salvadoran Case 71 The Context of Exit 74 The Context of Reception 88 Deportation of Salvadorans 96 The Context of Return 98 CHAPTER 4 Methods and Reflections 104 Data Collection 106 Negotiating Participation 109 iii Study Administration 112 The Negotiation of Difference 115 Risk, Uncertainty, and the Termination of Data Collection 119 Data Analysis 123 CHAPTER 5 Divergent Post-Deportation Trajectories 126 Portrait of the Sample 129 Three Key Post-Deportation Trajectories 140 CHAPTER 6 Hermano, Bienvenido a Casa 152 The Migratory Journey 153 Life in the U.S.
  • Outsource Partners International Combining Voice and Data on a Single Network Dramatically Reduces Monthly Telephone Costs

    Outsource Partners International Combining Voice and Data on a Single Network Dramatically Reduces Monthly Telephone Costs

    Customer Profile Outsource Partners International Combining voice and data on a single network dramatically reduces monthly telephone costs A Cisco AVVID network has helped this global outsourcing firm eliminate pricey conference calls and enjoy convenient, low-cost voice communication with its processing center in Bangalore, India. “ Although the initial Outsource Partners International (OPI) is High monthly telephone costs investment for Cisco’s a leading business process outsourcing In order to maintain quality control and firm specializing in finance and accounting serve its clients effectively, OPI must ensure network was more expensive services. OPI’s expertise in finance, 24-hour voice communication between its six than if we had used other accounting and process improvement U.S. offices and the company’s transaction vendors, the solution has comes from its employees’ significant processing facility in Bangalore. As a result, professional experience. Nearly all of the company was incurring substantial saved us a lot of money OPI’s senior managers have operational international long-distance phone charges on phone costs and the experience as controllers and chief financial every month. Compounding the problem, network has proved very officers. OPI associates have extensive its new U.S. branch offices acquired from reliable. At this rate, our public accounting experience and many KPMG need to place frequent conference have held finance and accounting leadership calls between locations—also resulting in investment will pay for positions for major companies with significant charges. itself very quickly.” worldwide operations. Most of OPI’s “We looked at solutions like instant management and professional staff joined messaging,” says Glen Baker, OPI’s Glen Baker the company through the acquisition of Director of Technology.
  • Official Sample Ballot Primary Election Tuesday, August 14, 2012

    Official Sample Ballot Primary Election Tuesday, August 14, 2012

    Miami-Dade County Elections Department Departamento de Elecciones del Condado de Miami-Dade Depatman Eleksyon Konte Miami-Dade Official Sample Ballot Primary Election Tuesday, August 14, 2012 Boleta Oficial de Muestra Elecciones Primarias Martes 14 de agosto del 2012 Echantiyon Bilten Vòt Ofisyèl Eleksyon Primè Madi 14 dawout 2012 For more information, go to www.miamidade.gov/elections or call 305-499-VOTE (8683). For TTY, call 305-499-8480. Para más información, puede acudir en línea a www.miamidade.gov/elections o llamar al 305-499-VOTE (8683). Para servicios TTY (sigla en inglés) llame al 305-499-8480. Pou plis enfòmasyon, vizite www.miamidade.gov/elections oswa rele 305-499-VOTE (8683). Pou TTY, rele 305-499-8480. Official Sample Ballot - Primary Election Boleta Oficial de Muestra - Elecciones Primarias Echantiyon Bilten Vòt Ofisyèl - Eleksyon Primè REGISTERED REPUBLICANS ONLY • INSCRITOS COMO REPUBLICANOS SOLAMENTE • MOUN KI ENSKRI KÒM REPIBLIKEN SÈLMAN UNITED STATES SENATOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 105 STATE REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 115 REPUBLICAN STATE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SENADOR DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 105 REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 115 STATE COMMITTEEWOMAN SENATÈ LÈZETAZINI REPREZANTAN ETA, DISTRIK 105 REPREZANTAN ETA, DISTRIK 115 COMITÉ EJECUTIVO REPUBLICANO DEL ESTADO (Vote for One) (Vote por uno) (Vote pou youn) (Vote for One) (Vote por uno) (Vote pou youn) (Vote for One) (Vote por uno) (Vote pou youn) MIEMBRO DEL COMITÉ ESTATAL KOMITE EGZEKITIF PATI REPIBLIKEN ETA A George LeMieux*
  • Differential Criminalization Under Operation Streamline: Challenges to Freedom of Movement and Humanitarian Aid Provision in the Mexico-US Borderlands

    Differential Criminalization Under Operation Streamline: Challenges to Freedom of Movement and Humanitarian Aid Provision in the Mexico-US Borderlands

    Volume 26 Refuge Number 2 Differential Criminalization under Operation Streamline: Challenges to Freedom of Movement and Humanitarian Aid Provision in the Mexico-US Borderlands Andrew Burridge Abstract visant l’incarcération massive des sans-papiers afin de On January 14, 2008, under the wider program of réduire les tentatives répétées de migration a été le plus the Arizona Denial Prosecution Initiative, Operation rigoureusement appliquée dans le secteur Tucson, couloir Streamline was put into effect in the Tucson Sector of the migratoire ayant la réputation d’être le plus achalandé et le Mexico-US borderlands . Initially implemented in Del plus meurtrier . Chaque jour, environ soixante-dix migrants Rio, Texas, this program—aimed at mass incarceration sont appréhendés par la US Border Patrol, puis condamnés of undocumented persons to reduce repeated migration à un maximum de 180 jours d’emprisonnement . L’auteur attempts—has been most rigorously applied in the Tucson considère le programme « Operation Streamline » et ses Sector, known as both the busiest and deadliest corridor for impacts sur les sans-papiers à travers le prisme de l’organi- migration . Every day approximately seventy migrants are sation locale, en particulier du groupe d’aide humanitaire apprehended by the US Border Patrol and then sentenced No More Deaths, affirmant que de telles politiques, qui for up to 180 days imprisonment . I consider Operation militarisent davantage la frontière et justifient la crimina- Streamline and its impacts on undocumented migrants lisation des migrants au yeux du grand public, exposent les through the lens of local organizing, particularly by the sans-papiers à un risque accru, avant même qu’ils soient humanitarian aid group No More Deaths, asserting that traduits en justice, à travers des pratiques de confinement such policies—which further militarize the border and jus- spatial qui ajoutent aux rigueurs de la traversée du désert tify criminalization of migrants in the public eye—put bod- de Sonora .
  • ROBERT NOVAK JOURNALISM FELLOWS Since Inception of the Program in 1994

    ROBERT NOVAK JOURNALISM FELLOWS Since Inception of the Program in 1994

    Update on the 141 ROBERT NOVAK JOURNALISM FELLOWS Since Inception of the Program in 1994 24th Annual Robert Novak Journalism Fellowship Awards Dinner May 10, 2017 2017 ROBERT NOVAK JOURNALISM FELLOWSHIP AWARD WINNERS HELEN R. ANDREWS | PART-TIME FELLOWSHIP Project: “Eminent Boomers: The Worst Generation from Birth to Decadence” Helen earned a degree in religious studies from Yale University, where she served as speaker of the Yale Political Union. Currently a freelance writer and commentator, she served for three years as a policy analyst for the Centre for Independent Studies, a leading conservative think tank in suburban Sydney, Australia. Previously, she was an associate editor at National Review. Her work has appeared in First Things, Claremont Review of Books, The American Spectator, The Weekly Standard and others. MADISON E. ISZLER | PART-TIME FELLOWSHIP Project: “What’s Killing Middle-Aged White Women—and What it Means for Society” Madison holds a master’s degree, cum laude, in political philosophy and economics from The King’s College. Currently, she is an Intercollegiate Studies Institute Reporting Fellow. She has interned for USA Today and the National Association of Scholars and was a reporter for the New York Post. Her work has appeared in numerous outlets, including the Raleigh News & Observer, Charlotte Observer, New York Post and Miami Herald. Originally from Florida, she resides in Raleigh, North Carolina. RYAN LOVELACE | PART-TIME FELLOWSHIP Project: “Hiding in Plain Sight: Criminal Illegal Immigration in America” An Illinois native, Ryan attended and played football for the University of Wyoming. He earned a Bachelor of Arts in journalism from Butler University.
  • Statement of the American Immigration Council

    Statement of the American Immigration Council

    STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL SUBMITTED TO THE U.S. HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING ENTITLED "OVERSIGHT OF UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT" September 16, 2016 Contact: Royce Bernstein Murray, 1331 G Street, NW, Suite 200 Director of Policy Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] Fax: 202/742-5619 Phone: 202/507-7510 The American Immigration Council (Immigration Council) is a non-profit organization which for over 25 years has been dedicated to increasing public understanding of immigration law and policy and the role of immigration in American society. We write to share our analysis and research regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and its impact on immigrants and their communities. We share in the Committee’s interest in engaging in oversight of ICE and holding the agency accountable for their enforcement actions and treatment of immigrants in their custody. While the Immigration Council provides research and analysis on a range of related issues, we call to the Committee’s attention our concerns about overbroad enforcement actions and detention of asylum seekers and families. The Immigration Council’s publications on these critical issues should serve to inform the Committee’s assessment of ICE’s work in these areas and provide discrete areas in need of a policy or procedural shift. Overbroad Enforcement: While we welcomed the Administration’s revisiting of enforcement priorities in 2014, the revised priorities remain overbroad, resulting in the placement of immigrants with old or minor criminal convictions into removal proceedings. ICE’s Criminal Alien Program (CAP) has become the primary channel through which interior immigration enforcement takes place; between two-thirds and three-quarters of individuals removed from the interior of the United States are removed through CAP.