DOCSLIB.ORG

Sulcaria Isidiifera

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sulcaria Isidiifera The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2019: T70386122A70386125 Scope: Global Language: English Sulcaria isidiifera Assessment by: McMullin, T., Allen, J. & Lendemer, J. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: McMullin, T., Allen, J. & Lendemer, J. 2019. Sulcaria isidiifera. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T70386122A70386125. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019- 3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Copyright: © 2019 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: Arizona State University; BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information provided. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Taxonomy Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Fungi Ascomycota Lecanoromycetes Lecanorales Parmeliaceae Taxon Name: Sulcaria isidiifera Brodo Identification Information: From Brodo (1986):Thallus dull yellowishwhite grading into light brown and reddish-brown at the more exposed tips; rarely shades of olive-gray in places ... 3-5 cm long; main branching isotomic to anisotomic-dichotomous, with more-or-less perpendicular spinulose branches developing from splits in the thallus; branches splitting lengthwise and opening into rather wide linear soralia filled with spinulose isidia and spinules, often with brown tips; main branches 0.3 - 0.5mm wide ... very brittle ... .Apothecia and pycnidia not seen. Assessment Information Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) ver 3.1 Year Published: 2019 Date Assessed: August 30, 2017 Justification: This species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) on the basis of it having a very narrow distribution (10 km diameter area), correlating to an extent of occurrence of less than 100 km², and an area of occupancy of just 8 km². A continuing decline in the extent of occurrence, and the number of mature individuals is reported, and it is considered that this species severely fragmented and found in 1-4 locations based on the threats of development and changes to the fire regimes. Geographic Range Range Description: This species is narrowly restricted to a small area of old-growth coastal chaparral scrub on stable sand dunes in San Luis Obispo County, California, U.S.A. Country Occurrence: Native: United States (California) © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Sulcaria isidiifera – published in 2019. 1 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Distribution Map Sulcaria isidiifera © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Sulcaria isidiifera – published in 2019. 2 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Population Sulcaria isidiifera was first discovered in 1984 and was formally described in 1986 (Brodo 1986). It is only known to inhabit an area that is 7 miles across at its widest point (Carlberg and Knudsen 2007). Repeated visits in recent years, including a 2012 visit from C. Bratt (one of the original two people that discovered it), documented significant observed decline in the population and habitat fragmentation (C. Bratt pers. comm., Carlberg and Knudsen 2007). Most known occurrences are within three state parks: Montana de Oro State Park, Morro Bay State Park, and Los Osos Oaks State Reserve, with the highest abundance at Montana de Oro (Reifner 1995). The rest of the population is on private or unregulated land (Carlberg and Knudsen 2007). Current Population Trend: Decreasing Habitat and Ecology (see Appendix for additional information) This is a corticolous species that is restricted to old-growth coastal chaparral scrub (Carlberg and Knudsen 2007). It occurs on the branches of trees and shrubs such as: Adenostoma fasciculatum, Quercus dumosa, Q. agrifolia, and Ceanothus ramulosus (Brodo 1986, Carlberg and Knudsen 2007). Systems: Terrestrial Threats (see Appendix for additional information) This species is threatened by residential development and changes in fire regimes. Development is the biggest threat to this species. Two communities, Los Osos and Baywood, have grown substantially in the last thirty years since Sulcaria isidiifera was discovered. They are within the range of this species and new development is reducing the already small area of suitable habitat. Conservation Actions (see Appendix for additional information) This species needs to be listed as an endangered species in the United States. Additionally, efforts need to be made to protect populations from residential development. Because of the small population size of this species and significant loss of habitat, reintroduction to areas where it has been lost should be attempted. Monitoring the abundance and health of this species needs to begin immediately. Also, the viability of reintroduction should be explored. Credits Assessor(s): McMullin, T., Allen, J. & Lendemer, J. Reviewer(s): Scheidegger, C. Contributor(s): Aptroot, A., Dahlberg, A., Weerakoon, G., Perez-Ortega, S & Spribille, T. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Sulcaria isidiifera – published in 2019. 3 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Bibliography Brodo, IM. 1986. A new species of the lichen genus Sulcaria (Ascomycotina, Alectoriaceae) from California. Mycotaxon 27: 113-117. IUCN. 2019. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2019-3. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org. (Accessed: 10 December 2019). T. Carlberg and K. Knudsen. 2007. Sulcaria isidiifera, sponsorship for the CALS Conservation Committee. Bulletin of the California Lichen Society 14(2): 45-47. Citation McMullin, T., Allen, J. & Lendemer, J. 2019. Sulcaria isidiifera. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019: e.T70386122A70386125. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019- 3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Disclaimer To make use of this information, please check the Terms of Use. External Resources For Images and External Links to Additional Information, please see the Red List website. © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Sulcaria isidiifera – published in 2019. 4 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Appendix Habitats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Major Season Suitability Habitat Importance? 3. Shrubland -> 3.8. Shrubland - Mediterranean-type Shrubby Vegetation Resident Suitable Yes Plant Growth Forms (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Plant Growth Forms Lichen Epiphyte Threats (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Threat Timing Scope Severity Impact Score 1. Residential & commercial development -> 1.1. Ongoing Majority (50- Rapid declines Medium Housing & urban areas 90%) impact: 7 Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality 2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance 11. Climate change & severe weather -> 11.2. Ongoing Minority (50%) Causing/could Low impact: 5 Droughts cause fluctuations Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance 7. Natural system modifications -> 7.1. Fire & fire Ongoing Minority (50%) Slow, significant Low impact: 5 suppression -> 7.1.1. Increase in fire declines frequency/intensity Stresses: 2. Species Stresses -> 2.1. Species mortality 2. Species Stresses -> 2.2. Species disturbance Conservation Actions in Place (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Conservation Actions in Place In-Place Research, Monitoring and Planning Action Recovery plan: No Systematic monitoring scheme: No In-Place Land/Water Protection and Management © The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: Sulcaria isidiifera – published in 2019. 5 https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T70386122A70386125.en Conservation Actions in Place Conservation sites identified: No Occur in at least one PA: Yes Percentage of population protected by PAs (0-100): 71-80 Area based regional management plan: No Invasive species control or prevention: Not Applicable In-Place Species Management Harvest management plan: No Successfully reintroduced or introduced beningly: No Subject to ex-situ conservation: No In-Place Education Subject to recent education and awareness programmes: No Included in international legislation: No Subject to any international management/trade controls: No Conservation Actions Needed (http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/classification-schemes) Conservation Actions Needed 1. Land/water protection -> 1.1. Site/area protection 2. Land/water management -> 2.1. Site/area management 3. Species management -> 3.2. Species recovery 3. Species management -> 3.3. Species re-introduction -> 3.3.1. Reintroduction 4. Education & awareness -> 4.1. Formal education
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KERN RIVER PARKWAY PLANT LIST (Only Plant Species Permitted for Projects Within the Kern River Parkway Area - Includes Streetscape and Parking Lots)
    KERN RIVER PARKWAY PLANT LIST (only plant species permitted for projects within the Kern River Parkway area - includes streetscape and parking lots) Scientific Name Common Name Type Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple Large tree Acer negundo ssp, californicum California box elder Large tree Aesculus californica California buckeye Large tree Alnus rhombifolia White alder Large tree Amelanchier pallida Western service berry Shrub or small tree Artemisia californica Coastal sage Shrub or small tree Artostaphlos densiflora Manzanita Shrub or small tree Artostaphlos glauca Manzanita Shrub or small tree Artostaphlos manzanita Manzanita Shrub or small tree Artostaphlos parryi Manzanita Shrub or small tree Atriplex lentiformis Quailbush Shrub or small tree Baccharis glutinosa Mulefat Shrub or small tree Baccharis pilularis "Twin Peaks" Dwarf coyote bush Flowering herb or groundcover Baccharis pilularis ssp. consanquinea Coyote bush Shrub or small tree Calycanthus occidentalis Western spice bush Shrub or small tree Carpenteria californica Tree anemone Shrub or small tree Castanopsis spp. Chiquapin Shrub or small tree Ceanothus cunneatus Ceanothus Shrub or small tree Ceanothus gloriosos Navarro ceanothus Flowering herb or groundcover Ceanothus griseus Carmel creeper Flowering herb or groundcover Ceanothus integerrimus Ceanothus Shrub or small tree Ceanothus leucodermis Ceanothus Shrub or small tree Ceanothus purpureus Ceanothus Shrub or small tree Ceanothus thrysiflorus Blue blossom Shrub or small tree Ceanothus thrysiflorus Ceanothus Shrub or small
    [Show full text]
  • 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska A, , Frank Kauff B,1, Filip Högnabba C, Jeffrey C
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10, Soili Stenroos c,10 a Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0338, USA b FB Biologie, Molecular Phylogenetics, 13/276, TU Kaiserslautern, Postfach 3049, 67653 Kaiserslautern, Germany c Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland d Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, 358 ESC, 21 Sachem Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA e Institut für Botanik, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Holteigasse 6, A-8010 Graz, Austria f Department of Plant Taxonomy and Nature Conservation, University of Gdan´sk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdan´sk, Poland g Science and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multigene Phylogenetic Synthesis for the Class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 Fungi Representing 1139 Infrageneric Taxa, 317 Genera and 66 Families
    A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Högnabba, F., Oliver, J. C., Molnár, K., Fraker, E., ... & Stenroos, S. (2014). A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 79, 132-168. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.003 Elsevier Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 132–168 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A multigene phylogenetic synthesis for the class Lecanoromycetes (Ascomycota): 1307 fungi representing 1139 infrageneric taxa, 317 genera and 66 families ⇑ Jolanta Miadlikowska a, , Frank Kauff b,1, Filip Högnabba c, Jeffrey C. Oliver d,2, Katalin Molnár a,3, Emily Fraker a,4, Ester Gaya a,5, Josef Hafellner e, Valérie Hofstetter a,6, Cécile Gueidan a,7, Mónica A.G. Otálora a,8, Brendan Hodkinson a,9, Martin Kukwa f, Robert Lücking g, Curtis Björk h, Harrie J.M. Sipman i, Ana Rosa Burgaz j, Arne Thell k, Alfredo Passo l, Leena Myllys c, Trevor Goward h, Samantha Fernández-Brime m, Geir Hestmark n, James Lendemer o, H. Thorsten Lumbsch g, Michaela Schmull p, Conrad L. Schoch q, Emmanuël Sérusiaux r, David R. Maddison s, A. Elizabeth Arnold t, François Lutzoni a,10,
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Management in California
    Oak Management Forest Service Pacific Southwest Forest and Range in California Experiment Station General Technical Report PSW-54 Timothy R. Plumb Philip M. McDonald Authors: TIMOTHY R. PLUMB is assigned to the Station's research unit studying the management of chaparral and related ecosystems in southern California, with head- quarters in Riverside, Calif. He attended Oregon State college, where he received a B.S. degree (1954) in forest management, and the University of California, Berkeley, where he received an M.S. degree (1959) in forestry. He received a doc- torate (1970) in plant physiology at the University of California, Riverside. PHILIP M. McDONALD is doing research on silviculture of Sierra Nevada forest types, with headquarters at Redding, Calif. He holds bachelor's (Washington State University, 1960) and master's (Duke University, 1961) degrees in forestry, and a Ph. D. degree in forest science (Oregon State University, 1978). Cover: A stand of old-growth valley oak (Quercus lobata ~6e)in Tehama County, California. Publisher: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station P.O. Box 245, Berkeley, California 94701 Oak Management in California Timothy R . Plumb Philip M . McDonald CONTENTS Introduction ................................................. 1 Speciesandstands ............................................2 Description ................................................2 Distribution ...............................................3 Inventory .................................................3 Oak Geography and Ecology
    [Show full text]
  • Alectorioid Morphologies in Paleogene Lichens: New Evidence and Re-Evaluation of the Fossil Alectoria Succini Mägdefrau
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Alectorioid Morphologies in Paleogene Lichens: New Evidence and Re-Evaluation of the Fossil Alectoria succini Mägdefrau Ulla Kaasalainen1*, Jochen Heinrichs2, Michael Krings3, Leena Myllys4, Heinrich Grabenhorst5, Jouko Rikkinen6, Alexander R. Schmidt1 1 Department of Geobiology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 2 Department of Biology and Geobio-Center, University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany, 3 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Munich (LMU), and Bavarian State Collection for Palaeontology and Geology, Munich, Germany, 4 Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 5 c/o Amber Study Group, Geological-Palaeontological Institute and Museum, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, 6 Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Kaasalainen U, Heinrichs J, Krings M, One of the most important issues in molecular dating studies concerns the incorporation of Myllys L, Grabenhorst H, Rikkinen J, et al. (2015) Alectorioid Morphologies in Paleogene Lichens: New reliable fossil taxa into the phylogenies reconstructed from DNA sequence variation in ex- Evidence and Re-Evaluation of the Fossil Alectoria tant taxa. Lichens are symbiotic associations between fungi and algae and/or cyanobacte- succini Mägdefrau. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0129526. ria. Several lichen fossils have been used as minimum age constraints in recent studies doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129526 concerning the diversification of the Ascomycota. Recent evolutionary studies of Lecanoro- Academic Editor: Peter Wilf, Penn State University, mycetes, an almost exclusively lichen-forming class in the Ascomycota, have utilized the UNITED STATES Eocene amber inclusion Alectoria succinic as a minimum age constraint.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast and Montane Ecological Province
    Vegetation Descriptions SOUTH COAST AND MONTANE ECOLOGICAL PROVINCE CALVEG ZONE 7 March 30, 2009 Note: This Province consists of the Southern California Mountains and Valleys Section or "Mountains" (M262B) and the Southern California Coast Section or "Coast" (262B) Note the slope gradients as follows: High gradient or steep (greater than 50%) Moderate gradient or moderately steep (30% to 50%) Low gradient (less than 30%) CONIFER FOREST / WOODLAND DM BIGCONE DOUGLAS-FIR ALLIANCE Bigcone Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga macrocarpa) - dominated stands are found in the Transverse and Peninsular Ranges from the Mt. Pinos region south. The Bigcone Douglas-fir Alliance is defined by the clear dominance of this species among competing conifers. It has been mapped sparsely in four subsections in the Coast Section, and infrequently in seven subsections and abundantly in four subsections of the Mountains Section. These pure conifer or mixed conifer and hardwood stands occur at lower elevations, generally in the range 1400 – 5600 ft (426 - 1708 m) in the Coast Section and up to about 7000 ft (2135 m) in the Mountains Section. Although mature individuals are capable of sprouting from branches and boles after burning, intense or frequently repeated fires and drought cycles will tend to eliminate this conifer. However, Bigcone Douglas-fir may become locally dominant with Canyon Live Oak (Quercus chrysolepis) as an associated tree on protected mesic canyon slopes, but not at the highest elevations. Sites in this Alliance are usually north facing at lower elevations and south-facing or steeper slopes at upper elevations. Shrub associates commonly include species of Ceanothus, Birchleaf Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides), California Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), Chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), and shrub forms of the Live Oaks (Quercus spp.).
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County
    DRAFT VEGETATION COMMUNITIES OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California” prepared by Robert F. Holland, Ph.D. for State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game (October 1986) Codes revised by Thomas Oberbauer (February 1996) Revised and expanded by Meghan Kelly (August 2006) Further revised and reorganized by Jeremy Buegge (March 2008) March 2008 Suggested citation: Oberbauer, Thomas, Meghan Kelly, and Jeremy Buegge. March 2008. Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California”, Robert F. Holland, Ph.D., October 1986. March 2008 Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County Introduction San Diego’s vegetation communities owe their diversity to the wide range of soil and climatic conditions found in the County. The County encompasses desert, mountainous and coastal conditions over a wide range of elevation, precipitation and temperature changes. These conditions provide niches for endemic species and a wide range of vegetation communities. San Diego County is home to over 200 plant and animal species that are federally listed as rare, endangered, or threatened. The preservation of this diversity of species and habitats is important for the health of ecosystem functions, and their economic and intrinsic values. In order to effectively classify the wide variety of vegetation communities found here, the framework developed by Robert Holland in 1986 has been added to and customized for San Diego County. To supplement the original Holland Code, additions were made by Thomas Oberbauer in 1996 to account for unique habitats found in San Diego and to account for artificial habitat features (i.e., 10,000 series).
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Tolerant Plant List
    10/24/2008 City of Clovis Approved Plant List These plants have been selected because they are attractive, often available in retail nurseries, non-invasive, and of course, drought tolerant. Use Area: R - Residential, C - Commercial, M - Municipal TYPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME USE AREA WATER USE Gc Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' Dwarf Prostrate Acacia VL Gc Baccharis spp. Coyote Brush L Gc Cotoneaster dammeri Bearberry Cotoneaster R,C M Gc Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy R,C M Gc Festuca ovina glauca Blue fescue R,C,M L Gc Fragaria californica Ornamental strawberry R,C,M M Gc Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana L Gc Myoporum parvifolium Myoporum L Gc Osteospermum spp. African daisy R,C,M L Gc Sedum spp. Stonecrop L Gc Trifolium fragiferum O'Connor O'Conners legume (revegetation use) L Gc Verbena pervuviana Peruvian verbena R,C L Gc Verbena tenuisecta moss verbena R,C L Gc P Achillea tomentosa woolly yarrow R L Gc P Artemisia spp. (herbaceous) tarragon/angel's hair etc. R,C,M L Gc P Convolvulus sabatius ground morning glory R,C L Gc P Oenothera speciosa Mexican/white evening primrose R,C L Gc P Oenothera speciosa 'Rosea' pink evening primrose R,C L Gc P Oenothera stubbei Baja evening primrose R,C L Gc P Verbena gooddingii Goodding verbena R,C,M L P Achillea clavennae silvery yarrow R,C L P Achillea filipendulina fern leaf yarrow R,C L P Anigozanthos flavidus kangaroo paw R L P Anigozanthos viridis green kangaroo paw R L P Arctotis hybrids African daisy R M P Coreopsis auriculata 'Nana' dwarf coreopsis R,C,M L P Coreopsis lanceolata coreopsis R,C,M L P Coreopsis verticilata cvs.
    [Show full text]
  • New and Noteworthy Lichen-Forming And
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Repository of the Academy's Library manuscript Kondratyuk et al. 2013 Acta Bot. Hung. 55(3–4): 275–349 . KONDRATYUK, S., LŐKÖS, L., TCHABANENKO, S., HAJI MONIRI, M., FARKAS, E., WANG, X. Y., OH, S.- O. and HUR, J.-S. NEW AND NOTEWORTHY LICHENS AND LICHENICOLOUS FUNGI NEW AND NOTEWORTHY LICHEN-FORMING AND LICHENICOLOUS FUNGI* [FOOTNOTE: Dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the foundation of the Korean Lichen Research Institute (KoLRI)] 1* 2 3 4 5 S. KONDRATYUK , L. LŐKÖS , S. TSCHABANENKO , M. HAJI MONIRI , E. F ARKAS , 6 7 7 X. Y. WANG , S.-O. OH and J.-S. HUR 1M. H. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Tereshchenkivska str. 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine; E-mail: *[email protected] 2Department of Botany, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1476 Budapest, Pf. 222, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] 3Sakhalin Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 34, Gorkogo Str. 25, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 693023, Russia, E-mail: [email protected], tuna 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran; E-mail: [email protected] 5Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-2163 Vácrátót, Alkotmány u. 2–4, Hungary; E-mail: [email protected] 6Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Biogeography, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan 650204, China 7Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 540-742, Korea; E-mails: [email protected] (Received 15 June, 2013; Accepted 25 July, 2013) Seventeen taxa new for science, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Succession After Fire in the Chaparral of Southern California Author(S): Ted L
    Succession after Fire in the Chaparral of Southern California Author(s): Ted L. Hanes Source: Ecological Monographs, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Winter, 1971), pp. 27-52 Published by: Wiley Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942434 Accessed: 09-10-2016 22:20 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Wiley is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Monographs This content downloaded from 166.5.183.94 on Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:20:33 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms SUCCESSION AFTER FIRE IN THE CHAPARRAL OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA' TED L. HANES2 Biology Department, Citrus College, Azusa, California TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT . ................ ................... 27 Vegetation and topography ..... ............... 36 INTRODUCTION ..... ... 28 Vegetation age ................ 38 Fire in chaparral . 29 Regeneration of shrub cover ..... ............. 39 Chaparral succession ........ 30 CALIFORNIA CHAPARRAL SUCCESSION .... .......... 41 Successional status of chaparral ...3...... 0. 30i Succession after fire ......................... 41 STUDY AREA ... 31 Coastal exposure-south-facing slopes ........... 42 Geography .... 31 Coastal exposure-north-facing slopes .... ...... 44 Soils ............................ ........... 31 Desert exposure ......... .................... 45 Climate ................................... 32 DISCUSSION .. .. ............... ....... .... ... 46 Composition and distribution of regional Chaparral climax in southern California .... ..... 46 vegetation ................................ 33 Fire-exclusion policy in chaparral ...
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Alliances of the San Dieguito River Park Region, San Diego County, California
    Vegetation alliances of the San Dieguito River Park region, San Diego County, California By Julie Evens and Sau San California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento CA, 95816 In cooperation with the California Natural Heritage Program of the California Department of Fish and Game And San Diego Chapter of the California Native Plant Society Final Report August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Study area ................................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Literature Review........................................................................................................... 2 Sampling ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1. Study area including the San Dieguito River Park boundary within the ecological subsections color map and within the County inset map............................................................ 3 Figure 2. Locations of the field surveys....................................................................................... 5 Cluster analyses for vegetation classification ............................................................................
    [Show full text]