Explorations of Identity and Communication the Authors Are Responsible for the Content of Their Articles Explorations of Identity and Communication
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Explorations of Identity and Communication The authors are responsible for the content of their articles Explorations of Identity and Communication Carmen Popescu (editor) Editura Universitaria Craiova, 2018 nv ; n; C Copyright © 2016 Editura Universitaria Toate drepturile sunt rezervate Editurii Universitaria Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României Explorations of identity and communication / ed.: Carmen Popescu. – Craiova: Universitaria ; Cluj-Napoca: Presa universitară clujeană, 2018 Conţine bibliografie ISBN 978-606-14-1417-8 ISBN 978-606-37-0391-1 I. Popescu, Carmen (ed.) Table of Contents Introduction Carmen Popescu ............................................................................................. 7 Part I. Identity and Communication in Literature The Winds of Change. Conceptual Metaphors with Arab Women Writers from the Middle East Bushra MK Khudhair Al Muttairi ................................................................. 21 The Quest for Self-knowledge in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman Bassim Hussein Al Nawashi ......................................................................... 30 Returning from Diaspora, Exile and the Loss of Identity in Inaam Kachachi’s The American Granddaughter Falih Mahdi Jabur AL-Zamili ....................................................................... 38 American Exceptionalism and Political Fear in Margaret Atwood’s Ustopias Adela Catană ................................................................................................. 49 On Lucian Blaga’s Metaphors and Similes. A Cognitive vs Traditional Linguistics Approach Mădălina Deaconu ........................................................................................ 58 Ethnopsycholinguistic Aspects of Bulgarian and Slavonic-Based Cognitive Models of the World Zlatina Dimova .............................................................................................. 69 Herman Melville’s Ismail and Ishmael: Moby-Dick in Islamic and Arabic Eyes Mohammed Naser Hassoon .......................................................................... 75 The Iceberg Theory: Hemingway’s Journalistic Technique Ghufran Abd Hussein .................................................................................... 85 Parentheses and Dialogization. Discursive Levels in Romanian Postmodern Poetry Emilia Parpală .............................................................................................. 93 5 Aspects of the Parodic Discourse in Romanian Contemporary Poetry Carmen Popescu ......................................................................................... 107 The Alienation of the Female Figure: Denial of Subjectivity in The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allan Poe Laura Monica Rădulescu ......................................................................... 121 W. B. Yeats’s Use of Irish Mythology and Folklore in order to Preserve Irish Identity Thabit Shihab Ahmed .................................................................................. 129 Identity and Ethics in Jane Austen’s Emma May H. Srayisah .......................................................................................... 139 Part II. Identity and Communication in Media and Culture Social Media and Iran’s 2017 Presidential Election. A Study of the Correlation between Instagram and Telegram Popularity and Students’ Political Participation Alireza Abdollahinezhad ............................................................................. 151 A Pragmatic Analysis of American Apologies: Depicting How Americans are Flouting Grice’s Maxims Ahmad Kareem Salem Al-Wuhaili ............................................................... 160 African American Cultural Projection, Intercultural Communication, and Co-Cultural Theory Péter Gaál-Szabó ...................................................................................... 174 “Getting Carter” through Post-Presidential Articulations (and What It Tells Us about News Discourse in an Age of Concision) Brian Michael Goss .................................................................................... 185 Communication Biology: A Transsexual Case Genta Maghvira, Engkus Kuswarno, Siti Karlinah .................................... 206 Olive Oil Tasting and Food Advertising Discourse Alina Țenescu .............................................................................................. 213 Internet Hoaxes: Chain Letters – How Dangerous Are They? Oana Voichici .............................................................................................. 219 Contributors ......................................................................................................... 230 6 Introduction Carmen Popescu University of Craiova “Identity” and “communication” are undoubtedly more than fashionable buzzwords: testifying to the existence of underlying obsessions, they are very much present in common parlance, albeit sometimes in an unclear manner. Indeed, both concepts are also values, which are likely to elicit an affective, emotional or ethical response and not just an intellectual one. One could even call them building blocks of modern civilization (more or less visible and more or more recognized as such), quintessential to our everyday life and to the encyclopedia of concepts we use in order to make sense of our surroundings. The “experience of modernity” throws us in a never-ending “struggle to make ourselves at home in a constantly changing world” (Berman 1988: 6) while “the postmodern politics of recognition” runs the risk of “boxing individuals into identity scripts” which are “far too narrow” (Sell 2000: 10-11). The emergence of modern identity depended, to a certain extent, on an “ethics of inarticulacy” (Taylor 1989: 53). A way of mitigating the hardships generated by both globalization and neo- tribalism is precisely the effort of articulating and mediating similar and different identities in the process of interpersonal and / or intercultural communication. Human communication is almost never just transmission of messages or the delivery of an informational “package”; instead, we should see it as a combination of content and relation (Watzlawick et al.1967: 54), the latter being a form of metacommunication: “Every communication has a content and a relationship aspect such that the latter classifies the former and is therefore meta-communication” (ibidem). The role of phatic communication in maintaining the social fabric is also an indication that the relation is sometimes more important than the content per se. According to Malinowski, phatic communion is “language used in free, aimless, social intercourse” (1972: 142). The scholarship regarding these two compelling notions highlighted in the title is undeniably huge and diverse but also overwhelming and confusing, because of the many ramifications, in quite divergent fields, engendered by their systematic theorization. The papers in this volume coagulate two main directions, given, on one hand, by the sociological approach, appropriate to the analysis of texts in such domains as journalism, mainstream media, social media and political discourse, and, 7 on the other hand, by the literary-critical approach, which is itself pluralistic, heterogeneous and inclined to borrow methods and principles from various sciences, including the ones grouped in the first direction, more sociologically-inclined. Literary communication can be conceptualized on a continuum with other, more “mundane” forms of human interaction, considering that “literary writing and reading are viewed as uses of language which amount to interpersonal activity” (Sell 2000: 2). Also, the dialogue that is literature is “a kind of give-and-take which has both ethical entailments and communal consequences” (Sell 2011: 10). As the recent trends in literary criticism tend to demystify literature and describe it primarily as a type of discourse among others or as part of culture in general, the alliance between the two orientations is all the more felicitous. In a complementary perspective, literariness or the specificity of literature is still to be defined in a satisfactory manner by literary theory, but many insights from traditional or modern approaches to literature can prove useful for the description of media discourse, which also resorts to indirect and ambiguous communication and even has its own poetics and rhetoric.1 In the previous volumes based on the proceedings of CIC conference, the editors stressed that identity was a “hyper-theorized term” which “has come to express nowadays a rather diffuse, fluid, contradictory set of characteristics, instead of stable, homogeneous and independent meanings” (Parpală 2017: 1). Identity is also a “dominant ontological term”, while “the global community has changed the rigid semantics of individual and collective ways of being, accentuating their ambiguity and forms of expression” (Loveday & Parpală 2016: 1). The complementarity between the key-notions “identity” and “communication” is embedded in the inextricable relationship between “subjectivity” and “alterity” (or “self” and “otherness”). Language itself is the proof of this pervasive dialectics: Consciousness of self is only possible if it is experienced by contrast. I use I only when I am speaking to someone who will be a you in my address. It is this condition of dialogue that is constitutive of person [....]. Many notions in linguistics, perhaps even in psychology, will appear in a different light if one reestablishes