DOCSLIB.ORG

A Research Framework for the Archaeology of the Extractive Industries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A RESEARCH FRAMEWORK FOR THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR CHALK EXTRACTION GENERAL Hayes, J W (Rev) 1909 ‘Deneholes and other chalk excavations: their origin and uses’ J Roy Anthropol Inst 39, 44-76 Smith, C J 1980 The Ecology of the English Chalk. Academic Press [includes economic aspects] BERKSHIRE Anon 1970 (no title) Newbury Weekly News 28/8/1970 Anon (nd) M4 Motorway Construction Report, Appendix 1 Underground voids at Furzehill (unpub report) Gray, R and Griffiths, S 1987 The Book of Wargrave. Wimpey Laboratories 1984 Chalk Mine at Lawrence Mead, Kintbury. Report on inspection and proposals for investigation. DORSET Woodward, P J 1987 ‘Romano-British industries in Purbeck: excavations at Norden by Nigel Sunter….’ Dorset Natur Hist Archaeol Soc Monograph Series 6 ESSEX Caiger, N 1976 ‘Caves in South London’ London Archaeol 3, 131-5 [chalk extraction of 'Kentish denehole' type] Chapman, D I and Hammond, P M 1962 ‘A Preliminary Report on Investigation in the Denehole at Hangman's Wood’ Essex Nature 31,11 Clift, J G N 1908 ‘A Criticism of the Hangman’s Wood Denehole Report’ J Brit Archaeol Ass 14, 101-129 Holmes, T V (nd) ‘Denehole at Gravesend’ Essex Nature 15, HERTFORDSHIRE Anon (CSS) 1990 Underground sites. Andrews, R T 1906 ‘Cave Gate, Anstey’ Trans E Herts Archaeol Soc 3.2, 217-19. [Chalk pit and site of shaft, Cave gate Wyddial: Includes plans, section] Anon (CSS) 1986 Caves and tunnels in SE England. 6.14, 50 [Chadwell chalk and flint mine] Fisher, J F & Walsh, J M 1944 ‘An investigation into chalk mining, with reference to a shaft near Kings Langley’ Trans Herts Nat Hist Soc 22.2, 48-51. Fookes, M 1997 Made in St Albans. Hertfordshire RIGS Group 1990 Site file on Shenley chalk mine. (unpub document) [post-med chalk mine] Hunn, J R & Stanyon, M 2009 ‘Nash Mills chalk mine’ The Quarterly 72, 17-20. Klijn, P & Clark, M 2005 The Cuffley story. 156, 223 [Chalk pits and caves] Lovell, B, & Tubbs, J 2006 ‘Ancient quarrying of rare in situ Palaeogene Hertfordshire puddingstone’ Mercian Geologist 16.3, 183-9. [Roman puddingstone] Murdoch’ K 2006. Information on chalk pit shaft at South Oxhey. (unpub document) [includes photos from the shaft] Niblett, R & Thompson, I 2005 Alban's buried towns: an assessment of St Albans' archaeology up to AD 1600. [Numerous chalk pits, flint mines extraction pits including Roman and Medieval] Trueman, M 1996 The lime, cement and plaster industries; Monuments Protection Programme step 1 report. KENT and LONDON Bannister, N and Bannister D, 1993 Historic Landscape Survey of Wormshill Estate nr Sittingbourne Kent. (unpub report) [brickworks, chalk pits, dene holes] Caiger, N 1976 ‘Caves in South London’ London Archaeol 3, 131-5 Garrod, D 1977 ‘The Discovery of a Denehole at Bexley’ Kent Archaeol Rev 50, 248-50 Le Gear, R 1976 ‘Denehole at Rainham’ Archaeol Cantiana 91, 182-4 Le Gear, R 1983 ‘Three Agricultural Chalk Mines in North-West Kent’ Archaeol Cantaina 99, 67-72 Le Gear, R 2002 ‘Chalkwells: Hartlip and Lynsted’ Archaeol Cantiana 122, 416-17 [which reports the discovery of two chalkwell denehole's dating to the eighteenth or early-nineteenth centuries] Le Gear, R 2002 ‘Medieval Denehole at Kingsdown near Sittingbourne’ Archaeol Cantiana 122, 414-15 [which notes the discovery of a denehole when the roof of one of the underground chambers collapsed. The author dates the chalk mine to around 1250–1260 AD Le Gear, R 2003 ‘An Eighteenth-Century Chalk Mine: Northfleet’ Archaeol Cantaina 123, 403-5 Le Gear, R 2004 ‘The Dulley Caves’ Kent Archaeol Rev 157, 158-60 [Description of a series of chalk caves at Dulley, probably created by chalk mining] Le Gear, R 2005 ‘An Eighteenth-Century Chalk Cave at Manston’ Archaeol Cantaina 125, 293 [account of the discovery of a section of chalk tunnel, probably dug to obtain chalk for agricultural use during the eighteenth century] Olgilvie, D J R 1960 ‘Denhole at Barmling’ Archaeol Cantiana 74, 190-2 NORFOLK Atkin, M 1981 ‘The Chalk Tunnels of Norwich for Extraction of Chalk and Flint’ Norfolk Archaeol 38, 312-20 Bruce-Mitford, R L S 1951 ‘A late-medieval chalk-mine at Thetford’ Norfolk Archaeol 30, 220-22 Hewitt, H D 1957 ‘Chalk Mines at Thetford’ Norfolk Archaeol 31.4, 221-31 Reader, F W 1910 ‘Deneholes, Chalk Mines, and some Ancient uses of Chalk’ Woolwich Dist Antiq Soc Rep 15, 31-50 SUFFOLK Carr, R D 1970s Suffolk Archaeological Service. Site Report. (SCCAS) [adits and shafts at chalk mine, now destroyed; unpub document] SURREY Bagnall, C 2004 ‘The archaeology of industrial extraction from Banstead and Walton Heaths’ Surrey Archaeol Collect 91, 167-86 [gives an account of the history or possible history of the fifty pits shown on the Ordnance Survey maps of Banstead and Walton Heaths surveyed between 1866 and 1934] Barfoot, J F 1985 ‘Excavations at the Old Quarry, Ashtead, Surrey, 1974’ Surrey Archaeol Collect 76, 81-7 Sowan, P W 1976 ‘Chalk mines is Surrey as a source of freestone’ Proc Croyden NHSS 16.2, 82-7 WILTSHIRE Crowley, D A 1987 A history of Wiltshire, volume 13: SW Wiltshire: Chalk and Dunworth Hundreds. Oxford: OUP (Victoria County History) Ride, D J 2005 ‘Quarrying for flint and chalk at Porton village: prehistoric and recent activity’ Wiltshire Archaeol and Nature Hist Mag 98, 29-34 [Description of a chalk quarry in Porton village which is rich in prehistoric flint flakes] .
Recommended publications
  • Dartford Antiquities

    Dartford Antiquities

    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society ( 304 ) DAETFOED ANTIQUITIES. NOTES ON BEITISH EOMAN AND SAXON EEMAINS THEBE EOUND. BY E. C. J. SPURRELL. STONE IMPLEMENTS. WHEN the Kent Archaeological Society met at Dartford, in 1868, the knowledge and study of the more ancient stone implements was in an early stage; almost in its infancy, being, so far as this country was concerned, barely ten years old. And as those stone implements were not commonly accepted as the work of man, they were looked upon doubtfully by the old antiquary: and because one class of them came out of deep cuttings in the ground, and from stalagmite caverns, they were left to geologists as " fossils; " regarding that word as dismissing the matter into the domain of geology. Yet, for all that, the recognition of the earliest palaeolithic implements, as human workmanship is due to Englishmen's acumen; and although the study was revived in Erance, it was consolidated into a science by the investigation of Englishmen once agaim In our own district, that is, about ten miles round Dartford, quite as much attention has been paid to the matter as in any spot in the world, and with a greater success than anywhere else in determin- ing certain controverted points; such as the reality of human agency in the formation of implements, and the larger grasp of the subject consequent on the minute search which has traced them continuously through a greater range in elevation and consequently of age.
  • K E N T a Rc H a E O Lo G I C a L S O C I E

    K E N T a Rc H a E O Lo G I C a L S O C I E

    KE N T ARC H A E O LO G I C A L SO C I E T Y nnIssue numberee 67 wwss ll ee tt tt ee Winter r2005/6r Inside 2-3 KURG Library Notes GOING UNDERGROUND Tebbutt Research Grants KHBCRequire Recruits Letters to the Editor 4-5 What’s on 6-7 What’s on Happy Birthday CAT CATKITS 8-9 Notice Board 10-11 Bee Boles Cattle Droving 12-13 Wye Rural Museum YACActivities 14-15 Thanet Pipeline Microfilm Med Records New Books 16 Hunt the Saxons THE KENT UNDERGROUND RESEARCH GROUP HAVE SURVEYED SITES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY FROM ROMAN WELLS TO WORLD WAR TWO BUNKERS www.kentarchaeology.org.uk KE N T UN D E R G R O U N D RE S E A R C H GR O U P URG is an affiliated group of the KAS. We are mining historians – a unique blend of unlikely Kopposites. We are primarily archaeologists and carry out academic research into the history of underground features and associated industries. To do this, however, we must be practical and thus have the expertise to carry out exploration and sur- veying of disused mines. Such places are often more dangerous than natural caverns, but our members have many years experience of such exploration. Unlike other mining areas, the South East has few readily available records of the mines. Such records as do exist are often found in the most unlikely places and the tracing of archival sources is an ongoing operation. A record of mining sites is maintained and constantly updated as further sites are discovered.
  • Provisional Checklist and Account of the Mammals of the London Borough of Bexley

    Provisional Checklist and Account of the Mammals of the London Borough of Bexley

    PROVISIONAL CHECKLIST AND ACCOUNT OF THE MAMMALS OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BEXLEY Compiled by Chris Rose BSc (Hons), MSc. 4th edition. December 2016. Photo: Donna Zimmer INTRODUCTION WHY PROVISIONAL? Bexley’s mammal fauna would appear to be little studied, at least in any systematic way, and its distribution is incompletely known. It would therefore be premature to suggest that this paper contains a definitive list of species and an accurate representation of their actual abundance and geographical range in the Borough. It is hoped, instead, that by publishing and then occasionally updating a ‘provisional list’ which pulls together as much currently available information as can readily be found, it will stimulate others to help start filling in the gaps, even in a casual way, by submitting records of whatever wild mammals they see in our area. For this reason the status of species not thought to currently occur, or which are no longer found in Bexley, is also given. Mammals are less easy to study than some other groups of species, often being small, nocturnal and thus inconspicuous. Detecting equipment is needed for the proper study of Bats. Training in the live-trapping of small mammals is recommended before embarking on such a course of action, and because Shrews are protected in this regard, a special licence should be obtained first in case any are caught. Suitable traps need to be purchased. Dissection of Owl pellets and the identification of field signs such as Water Vole droppings can help fill in some of the gaps. Perhaps this document will be picked up by local students who may be looking for a project to do as part of their coursework, and who will be able to overcome these obstacles.
  • GENERAL INDEX Abbreviation: K.A.O., Kent Archives Office

    GENERAL INDEX Abbreviation: K.A.O., Kent Archives Office

    Archaeologia Cantiana Vol. 77 1962 GENERAL INDEX Abbreviation: K.A.O., Kent Archives Office. Abbotaridge Wateringe, Brenzett, map, Lindsey, 51; Lisle, 60; Lupus, 52; 1653, 180. Mablethorpe, 56; Malpas, 60; Man- Abergavenny, Barons, 48-62. ners, 54; Marmion, 66; Marshall, 61; Abergavenny, George, Lord, d. 1492, Matravers, 54; Mereworth, 61, 62; 57; George Nevill, 5th lord, d. 1525, Mildmay, 51; Montfort, 58; More, 50; 52; Henry Nevill, 6th lord, d. 1587, Morley, 52; Mortimer, 60; Mowbray, 54, 57. 54; Muschamp, 55; Neubourg, 60; Agriculture, Medway Towns, 1687- Nevill of Abergavenny, 56, 59, 61; 1783, 167-8. Newton (Cradock), 58; Norbury, 58; Allhallows, map, 1697, 180. Pakeman, 53; Parr, 56; Paulet, 51; Allington, map, 1678, 180. Perrott, 58; Persall, 58; Pigott, 48; Angell, arms of, 58. de la Pole, 67; Poynings, 51; Reyns- Anglo-Saxon: bronze mounts, 156-9; forth, 51; Roberts, 59; Roos of cemetery at Northfleet, 157. Kendal, 51, 54, 56; Russell, 55; Appledore, 63, 68, 69, 72; map, 1628, Sackville, 50; St. Amand, 57; St. 180. John, 51; St. Owen, 58; St. Quentin, Arms, heraldic: Angell, 58; Arundel, 66; Bancroft, 50; Sapcotts, 55; de 52, 54; Badsell, 59; Bamme, 49; Saye, 52; Scotland, 54; Sea, 149; Baynard, 59; Beauchamp, 57, 59, 60; Seases, 53; See of York, 55; Sher- Berkeley, 60; Beler, 53; Bernake, 52; bourne, 58; Sherington, 55; Sidney, Bitton, 58; Boteler, 58; Boys, 149; 49; Skelton, 51; Sowby, 53; Spencer, Bray, 57; Braybroke, 57; Brook 50; Staveley, 56; Sterne, 55; Sti- (Cobham), 57; Brotherton, 54; Calde- dolph, 59; Sudeley, 58;
  • Lower Thames Crossing Options: Output 2 Design & Costing Report

    Lower Thames Crossing Options: Output 2 Design & Costing Report

    April 2013 Review of Lower Thames Crossing Options: Output 2 Design & Costing Report Prepared by: ....................................................... Checked by: .................................................................. Richard Lyon Ian Burrows Associate Director Regional Director Approved by: ....................................................... Paul Hanson Regional Director Review of Lower Thames Crossing Options: Output 2 Design & Costing Report Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 8 Published IB PH 25-04-13 7 Draft Final Version IB PH 18-04-13 6 Draft Final version including client comments CLB/ RL PH 22-03-13 5 Revised Draft version 2 IB PH 08-02-13 4 Revised Draft version 1 IB PH 13-12-12 3 Revised chapters 1 and 2 IB PH 14-09-12 2 Second draft issue with cost information JW PH 17-08-12 1 First draft issue; excludes cost and risk information JW IB 20-07-12 Saxon House, 27 Duke Street, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 1HT Telephone: 01245 771200 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60249197 Reference Output 2: Design and Costing Report Date Created April 2013 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. Although this report was commissioned by the Department for Transport (DfT), the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT.
  • London Paramount Entertainment Resort Swanscombe, Kent Historic Landscape Characterisation

    London Paramount Entertainment Resort Swanscombe, Kent Historic Landscape Characterisation

    making sense of heritage London Paramount Entertainment Resort Swanscombe, Kent Historic Landscape Characterisation Ref: 106752.01 June 2015 London Paramount Entertainment Resort Swanscombe Kent Historic Landscape Characterisation Prepared for: Savills 33 Margaret Street London W1G 0JD On behalf of: London Resort Company Holdings Limited 17 Albermarle Street London W1S 4HP Prepared by: Wessex Archaeology Bridgewood House 8 Laker Road Rochester Airport Industrial Estate Kent ME1 3QX www.wessexarch.co.uk June 2015 106572.01 © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2015, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Ltd is a Registered Charity No. 287786 (England & Wales) and SC042630 (Scotland) London Paramount Entertainment Resort Historic Landscape Characterisation Quality Assurance Project Code 106572 Accession - Client - Code Ref. Planning - Ordnance Survey (OS) national grid 561145, 173929 Application reference (NGR) Ref. Version Status* Prepared by Checked and Approved By Approver’s Signature Date v01 I GC SPB 24-06-2015 File: R:\PROJECTS\106572\_Reports\Working E GC SPB 26-06-2015 File: R:\PROJECTS\106572\_Reports\Working File: File: File: * I = Internal Draft; E = External Draft; F = Final DISCLAIMER THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF A REPORT TO AN INDIVIDUAL CLIENT AND WAS PREPARED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT CLIENT. THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY STAND ON ITS OWN AND IS NOT INTENDED TO NOR SHOULD IT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY THIRD PARTY. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW WESSEX ARCHAEOLOGY WILL NOT BE LIABLE BY REASON OF BREACH OF CONTRACT NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE (WHETHER DIRECT INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL) OCCASIONED TO ANY PERSON ACTING OR OMITTING TO ACT OR REFRAINING FROM ACTING IN RELIANCE UPON THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT ARISING FROM OR CONNECTED WITH ANY ERROR OR OMISSION IN THE MATERIAL CONTAINED IN THE REPORT.
  • The Cultural Heritage of Woodlands in the Kent Downs AONB

    The Cultural Heritage of Woodlands in the Kent Downs AONB

    The cultural heritage of woodlands in the South East The cultural heritage of woodlands in the Kent Downs AONB View across the Devil’s Kneading Trough at Wye in the Kent Downs (Photo - PM) 22 The cultural heritage of woodlands in the South East The Cultural Heritage of Woodlands in the Kent Downs AONB Description of the Kent Downs AONB high above sea level. Its long axis (215 kilometres) The Kent Downs AONB was designated in 1968 and stretched from the Bas de Boulonnais in France through covers 878 square kilometres. The AONB stretches Kent into Surrey, Sussex and Hampshire 2. Over the from the Surrey and Greater London boundary in the last 20 million years the Wealden dome has been eroded west (and is contiguous with the chalk escarpment of the rather like an onion, revealing a very varied east-west Surrey Hills AONB), to the Straits of Dover in the east. banded geological structure. The oldest exposed rocks The Kent Downs AONB lies wholly in Kent (except - the Hastings Beds - lie in the centre of the Weald and for a small area in the London Borough of Bromley) dominate the High Weald AONB, and the youngest lie and occupies 23% of the county 1. Although the Kent around the outer marked by the chalk escarpment and Downs is dominated by the chalk hills, at its western dip slope of the Surrey Hills and Kent Downs AONBs. end the AONB extends south into the Greensand Hills On the top of the North Downs escarpment are Drift (known locally as the Chart Hills) and the Weald Clay deposits dominated by a capping of Clay-with-Flints, which forms part of the river catchment area of the and an iron-rich sandy deposit known as the Lenham Medway.
  • Pepperhill to Cobham

    Pepperhill to Cobham

    A Road Through the Past Archaeological Discoveries on the Pepperhill to Cobham A2 rchaeological excavations Background to along the route of the A2 APepperhill to Cobham Widening the discoveries Scheme, near Gravesend in Kent, have uncovered a rich archaeological landscape reaching back 10,000 years. The discoveries include a sensational series of rich burials dating to around the time of the Roman conquest, which are amongst the finest ever found in Britain. Important evidence for prehistoric and medieval settlement was also found. The excavations were carried out by Oxford Archaeology, working for Skanska on the £122 million Highways Agency scheme. Archaeological fieldwork was carried out over eleven months from September 2006. Analysis of the findings is being carried out and a detailed report will be published in early 2010. This booklet presents highlights of the findings to date. The main area of archaeological investigation runs for nearly 3 km between Pepperhill Junction and Marling Cross Junction. It traverses two raised plateaux divided by a dry valley at Tollgate Junction (A227 Wrotham Road). Smaller-scale excavations were Photograph taken in 1922 during construction of an earlier version of the A2 showing the surface also carried out prior to the construction of Roman Watling Street (courtesy of Kent of two new drainage ponds adjacent to Archive Service, Centre for Kentish Studies) Cobham Services. Essex Greater Ebbsfleet London Station River Thames GRAVESEND SWANSCOMBE NORTHFLEET Surrey Kent GRAVESEND Finshed course of West
  • General Index

    General Index

    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society GENERAL INDEX Abbreviation: K.A.O., Kent Archives Office. Abbotsridge Wateringe, Brenzett, map, Lindsey, 51; Lisle, 60; Lupus, 52; 1653, 180. Mablethorpe, 56; Malpas, 60; Man- Abergavenny, Barons, 48-62. ners, 54; Marmion, 56; Marshall, 61; Abergavenny, George, Lord, d. 1492, Matravers, 54; Mereworth, 61, 62; 57; George Nevin, 5th lord, d. 1525, Mildmay, 51; Montfort, 58; More, 50; 52; Henry Nevi11, 6th lord, d. 1587, Morley, 52; Mortimer, 60; Mowbray, 54, 57. 54; Muschamp, 55; Neubourg, 60; Agriculture, Medway Towns, 1687- Nevi11 of Abergavenny, 56, 59, 61; 1783, 167-8. Newton (Cradock), 58; Norbury, 58; Allhallows, map, 1697, 180. Pakeman, 53; Parr, 56; Paulet, 51; Allington, map, 1678, 180. Perrott, 58; Persall, 58; Pigott, 48; Angell, arms of, 58. de la Pole, 57; Poynings, 51; Reyna- Anglo-Saxon: bronze mounts, 156-9; forth, 51; Roberts, 59; Roos of cemetery at Northfleet, 157. Kendal, 51, 54, 56; Russell, 55; Appledore, 63, 68, 69, 72; map, 1628, Sackville, 50; St. Amand, 57; St. 180. John, 51; St. Owen, 58; St. Quentin, Arms, heraldic: Angell, 58; Arundel, 56; Sancroft, 50; Sapcotts, 55; de 52, 54; Badsell, 59; Bamme, 49; Saye, 52; Scotland, 54; Sea, 149; Baynard, 59; Beauchamp, 57, 59, 60; Seases, 53; See of York, 55; Sher- Berkeley, 60; Beler, 53; Bernake, 52; bourne, 58; Sherington, 55; Sidney, Bitton, 58; Boteler, 58; Boys, 149; 49; Skelton, 51; Sowby, 53; Spencer,
  • List of Unpublished Fieldwork Reports Held by Kent County Council

    List of Unpublished Fieldwork Reports Held by Kent County Council

    LIST OF UNPUBLISHED FIELDWORK REPORTS HELD BY KENT COUNTY COUNCIL The following reports (so-called ©grey literature©) may be viewed by appointment only with the Kent Historic Environment Record Team at: Invicta House County Hall Maidstone ME14 1XX telephone: 01622 221541 email : [email protected] Report Publication Title Author Easting Northing number Date 1978/1 54 ROCHESTER ROAD KENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY 574272 168637 1979/1 1979 THE MINTYARD, CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL Canterbury Archaeological Trust 615118 158098 1980/1 1980 ST PETERS STREET - GAS WORKS REDEVELOPMENT, MAIDSTONE WIMPEYS 575650 155742 1982/1 1982 RIPPLE RD, RIPPLE Dover Archaeological Group 636290 149333 1982/2 1982 CHATHAM HISTORIC DOCKYARD (INITIAL STUDY) R ELLIS, H WILSON AND L 575874 169347 WOMERSLEY 1984/1 1984 BORE PLACE- BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SURVEY Institute of Archaeology Field 550866 149209 Archaeology Unit 1985/1 1985 ROCHESTER, KENT - ANALYSIS OF COIN PELLET MOULDS English Heritage 574270 168640 1985/2 1985 MAIDSTONE SPINE ROAD - BOREHOLE REPORTS KENT COUNTY COUNCIL 575600 156205 1985/3 1985 BORE PLACE (THE MOUNT AND WARREN)- EXCAVATION Institute of Archaeology Field 550806 149276 Archaeology Unit 1987/1 1987 HAM FARM, FAVERSHAM KENT RURAL PLANNING SERVICES PLC 602081 162641 1987/2 1987 RIVERVIEW PARK, GRAVESEND A G WEEKS AND PARTNERS 566358 171095 1988/1 1988 ABBEY STREET, FAVERSHAM BRIAN MOOREHEAD AND 601857 161857 PARTNERS 1988/2 1988 SNOWDOWN COLLIERY - POLICY GUIHoneyDELINES DOVER DISTRICT COUNCIL 624772 151081 1988/3 1988 NETHERCOURT ESTATE
  • Scheme Assessment Report Volume 2 Appendices

    Scheme Assessment Report Volume 2 Appendices

    Lower Thames Crossing Pre-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report Volume 2: Introduction and Existing Conditions Volume 2 Section 13: Appendices Lower Thames Crossing Route Consultation 2016 PRE-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 2 – SECTION 13 APPENDICES) Contents Description Appendix 2.1 Previous Studies References Appendix 2.2 Key Plan Appendix 2.3 Public Rights of Way and Cycle Routes Appendix 2.4 Existing Geology and Mining Appendix 2.5 Existing Utilities Appendix 2.6 Highway and River Operation and Maintenance Appendix 2.7 Air and Noise Constraints and Air Quality Modelling Receptor Locations Appendix 2.8 Landscape/ Townscape Constraints Appendix 2.9 Historic Environment Constraints Appendix 2.10 Biodiversity Constraints Appendix 2.11 Water Constraints Appendix 2.12 Community Land Use Constraints ii PRE-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 2 - SECTION 13 APPENDICES) HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-010 DATE PUBLISHED JANUARY 2016 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED PRE-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT – (VOLUME 2 - SECTION 13 APPENDICES) Appendix 2.1 Previous Studies References Previous Studies References A2.2 - 1 PRE-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 2 - SECTION 13 - APPENDICES HA540039-HHJ-ZZZ-REP-ZZZ-010 DATE PUBLISHED JANUARY 2016 UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED PRE-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT – (VOLUME 2 - SECTION 13 APPENDICES ) Title Date Client Author(s) Assessment of Lower Thames November 2008 Essex County Council and Gifford, MVA Crossing Capacity Kent County Council Consultancy and Capita Dartford
  • Post-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report (Volume 2) - Introduction and Existing Conditions

    Post-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report (Volume 2) - Introduction and Existing Conditions

    Lower Thames Crossing Post-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report Volume 2 Volume Volume 2: Introduction and Existing Conditions Lower Thames Crossing | 2017 POST-CONSULTATION SCHEME ASSESSMENT REPORT (VOLUME 2) - INTRODUCTION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Structure of Post-Consultation Scheme Assessment Report ........................... 1 1.2 Structure of this Volume ................................................................................... 2 2 Scheme Background ................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Previous Studies .............................................................................................. 4 3 Existing Traffic and Physical Conditions................................................................. 8 3.1 Existing Network ............................................................................................... 8 3.2 A282 Corridor ................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Dart Charge .................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Traffic Management Cell ................................................................................ 11 3.5 A2 and