Integrated Pest Management for Australian Apples & Pears

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Pest Management for Australian Apples & Pears WWW.INDUSTRY.NSW.GOV.AU INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT FOR AUSTRALIAN APPLES & PEARS INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT FOR AUSTRALIAN APPLES & PEARS Disclaimer This document has been prepared by the authors While the information is considered true for Apple and Pear Australia Limited (APAL) in and correct as at August 2009, changes in good faith on the basis of available information. circumstances after the time of publication may affect the accuracy of the information. The While the information contained in the information may change without notice, and document has been formulated with due care, Apple and Pear Australia Limited, the authors the users of the document must obtain their and the publisher and their respective servants own advice and conduct their own investigations and agents are not in any way liable for the and assessments of any proposals they are accuracy of any information contained in this considering, in the light of their individual document. circumstances. The product names in this publication are The document is made available on the supplied on the understanding that no preference understanding that Apple and Pear Australia between equivalent products is intended and Limited, the authors and the publisher, their that the inclusion of a product name does not respective servants and agents accept no imply endorsement by Apple and Pear Australia responsibility for any person acting on, or relying Limited over any equivalent product from on or upon, any opinion, advice representation, another manufacturer. statement or information whether expressed or implied in the document, and disclaim all Recognising that some of the information in liability for any loss, damage, cost, or expense this document is provided by third parties, incurred or arising by reason of any person using Apple and pear Australia Limited, the authors or relying on the information contained in the and the publisher take no responsibility for the document or by reason of error, omission, defect accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of or mis-statement (whether such error, defect any information included in the document and or mis-statement is caused by, or arises from, provided by third parties. negligence, lack of care or otherwise). Always read the label Users of agricultural or veterinary chemical absolved from compliance with the directions products must always read the label and any on the label or the conditions of the permit by permit, before using the product, and must reason of any statement made or not made in this strictly comply with the directions on the label publication. and the conditions of any permit. Users are not © The State of New South Wales, Industry & Investment NSW Apple and Pear Australia Limited. 2009 ISBN 978 1 74256 014 4 Prepared by Shane Hetherington Edited by Ann Munroe 02/10 - 7252 Contents Disclaimer . .i Making the decision to use IPM: personal choices . .vi Always read the label . i Some IPM terms defined . vii. Acknowledgments and contributors . iii About this manual . vii. What is IPM? . .iv Six steps to controlling diseases of apples and pears Six steps to controlling diseases of apples Step 3: Monitor . .16 and pears . 1. Step 4: Take action only if you need to . .19 Step 1: Prepare and prevent . 3. Step 5: Evaluate the season . .20 Step 2: Have a pest management plan for the season . 14 Step 6: Plan for next season . .21 Mating disruption Mating disruption . .23 Optimising the effectiveness of mating disruption . .25 Introduction . .24 Tips for optimising dispenser use . 26 What is mating disruption? . 24 Is mating disruption working? Advantages of mating disruption . 24 Monitoring in mating disruption blocks . 27 Can mating disruption be used Emergence of secondary pests . .27 on my block? . .25 Pest and disease factsheets Alternaria leaf blotch and fruit spot . 30 San José scale . 113 Apple dimpling bug . .35 Storage rots . 117 Apple scab (Black spot), Pear scab . .40 Thrips: Western flower thrips, Plague thrips . .123 Bitter rot . 51 Weevils: Fuller’s rose weevil, Garden weevil, Apple weevil, Fruit tree root weevil, Codling moth . .55 Eucalyptus weevil . 128 Fruit flies: Queensland fruit fly, Woolly aphid . 134 Mediterranean fruit fly . .63 Apple leafhopper (canary fly in Tasmania) . .141 Helicoverpa and loopers . .68 Apple mosaic virus . .143 Lightbrown apple moth . .73 Armillaria root rot . 144 Longtailed mealybug . .79 Bitter pit . .146 Mites:Two-spotted mites, European red mites, Bryobia mites . .83 Pear leaf blister mite . .148 Pear blossom blast . 96 Silver leaf . 150 Pear slug, Pear sawfly . 99 Snails . 152 Phytophthora root and crown rot . .102 White root rot . 155 Powdery mildew . .108 Wingless grasshoppers and katydids . 157 i Contents (cont’d) Reducing the impacts of birds in horticulture Introduction . .160 Acknowledgments . .165 Management options . 162 Forms, schedules and resources Appendix 1 . Pesticide application record sheet . 168 Appendix 4 . Effect on beneficial arthropods of pesticides registered for use on apples Appendix 2 . Useful contacts . 169 and pears . 173 Appendix 3 . Suppliers of biological Appendix 5 . Using pesticides in IPM . 179 control agents . .171 More information and index More information . 200Index . 206 ii Acknowledgments and contributors Coordinating author Thanks also to the extension staff from various Shane Hetherington State Government departments of primary industries and agriculture who helped to run the The project team meetings that provided the focus for this manual. Ms Penny Domeney, Department of Primary Particular thanks to the industry-minded Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, orchardists who contributed their valuable Tasmania time to attend the project meetings that gave a practical focus to this manual. Dr Mofakhar Hossain, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria Photography Ms Christine Horlock, Department of All images supplied by photographers other Employment, Economic Development and than the coordinating author are acknowledged, Innovation, Queensland Primary Industries and but particular thanks to Paul James (SARDI), Fisheries Stuart Learmonth (DAFWA), Andrew Jessup Mr Stuart Gray, Apple and Pear Australia (I&I NSW), The Ontario Ministry of Food, Limited Agriculture and Rural Affairs and The Norfolk Fruit Growers Association. Contributing authors and reviewers Funding Staff from several State Government departments of agriculture and primary This manual was funded through Horticulture industries wrote and provided expert advice on Australia Limited from the national Apple and most chapters in this manual. Pear Levy, with a matching financial contribution from the Commonwealth Government of In formulating strategies for individual pests Australia. Apple and Pear Australia Limited and diseases, valuable technical input was given approved funding for this project to help by many people in addition to the project team, the Australian apple and pear industry in its including the following: transition to integrated pest management. Stuart Learmonth, Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia Dedication Paul James, South Australian Research and This manual is dedicated to my son Benjamin. Development Institute Research and production were therapy during hard times…You taught me that tough guys John Tracey, Industry & Investment NSW sometimes wear nappies! Graham Thwaite, NSW Department of Primary Industries (retired) Dr Shane Hetherington Anne Mooney, Industry & Investment NSW Industry Leader (Temperate Fruit) The authors would particularly like to thank the Industry & Investment NSW following apple and pear industry reviewers who provided valuable practical feedback and advice: David Finger, Carey Schultz, Brad Ashlin, Jeremy Price, Richard Hawkes. iii What is IPM? Integrated pest management (IPM)is a This information was taken from the Washington philosophy of pest control founded on the State University IPM online manual. I feel it principles of ecology. In practice, it involves using encompasses the mind shift that needs to take several control tactics based on a knowledge of place when entering into an IPM system. I feel the crop, pests and associated natural enemies to it summarises quite well the feelings of where avoid crop loss and minimize harmful effects on APAL see this manual taking growers. I am not the environment. Implementing IPM requires sure whether this is too wordy for your liking, it an understanding not only of insect and mite is just a suggestion which I feel embraces the idea biology and ecology but also of the entire of IPM to me. orchard system. This includes the plants and The complication is that, when choosing this animals that comprise the orchard community, option, you must consider its impact on the as well as consideration of contributions from entire block. the surrounding habitat. The orchard system also takes into account financial, physical and human All orchard blocks are home to a range of insects, aspects of orchard operations.More simply, IPM mites and micro-organisms that attack and kill involves evaluating your pest problems and then the pests that damage crops. These ‘beneficials’ applying the most appropriate solution. attack pests and limit the amount of damage that they cause. Unfortunately, many beneficials IPM requires a more tolerant approach to are killed by common orchard pesticides. pest control than traditional insecticide-based Broad-spectrum pesticides kill a wide range of programs. Eliminating all insects and mites organisms regardless of whether they
Recommended publications
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV the World Fauna of the Genus Lathrolestes
    DISSERTATIONES ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 The world fauna of the genus ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV The world fauna of the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Tartu 2015 ISSN 1024-6479 ISBN 978-9949-32-794-2 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 DISSERTATIONES BIOLOGICAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 272 ALEXEY RESHCHIKOV The world fauna of the genus Lathrolestes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Tartu Dissertation was accepted for the commencement of the degree of Doctor philosophiae in zoology at the University of Tartu on March 16, 2015 by the Scientific Council of the Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu. Supervisors: Tiit Teder, PhD, University of Tartu, Estonia Nikita Julievich Kluge, PhD, Saint Petersburg State University, Russia Opponent: Tommi Nyman, PhD, University of Eastern Finland, Finland Commencement: Room 301, 46 Vanemuise Street, Tartu, on May 26, 2015, at 10.15 a.m. Publication of this thesis is granted by the Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, and University of Tartu. Disclaimer: this dissertation is not issued for purpose of public and permanent scientific record, and remains unpublished for the purposes of zoological nomenclature (ICZN, 1999: 8.2.) ISSN 1024-6479 ISBN 978-9949-32-794-2 (print) ISBN 978-9949-32-795-9 (pdf) Copyright: Alexey Reshchikov, 2015 University of Tartu Press www.tyk.ee CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Beginners' Guide to Macro Moths: Te Hiku
    NZ moths are special many whakatauki written about the Why we need to trap the moths Why do we need to study moths? More than 86% of the known moths caterpillar and its capacity to eat. Who benefits from Moths are mainly out at night, so Moths breed fast and have lots of in NZ are endemic. They only occur studying moths? most people don’t see how many offspring. There are lots of different in NZ so we have to look after A more recent pest is the codling there are or what’s happening moth species playing different roles them.. moth (Cydia pomonella). Introduced to them. Unfortunately we need in the ecosystem. Moths have links Beginners’ Guide to Society from Europe, it attacks apples, You & I specimens for identification. to lots of other species (e.g. plants, Macro Moths Why are moths important? pears, walnuts, and other fruit. birds, introduced pests, other Moths are a key part of the wider Nature Why we need standardised data invertebrates). Moths have a bad reputation for ecosystem and they sit in the If we all use the same type of trap eating clothes, especially natural centre of a complex food web. The (e.g. a Heath Moth Trap) we can If something is changing in the Te Hiku fibres like wool, silk, and fur. In caterpillars are herbivores eating a compare data from different places ecosystem, moths are amongst reality there are very few moth range of native plants. and over time. With standardised the first creatures to respond. They species whose caterpillars eat Education information we can all work are likely to be good indicators of clothes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pear-Slug
    Volume 11 Article 1 Number 130 The pear-slug August 2017 The pear-slug R. L. Webster Iowa State College Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bulletin Part of the Agriculture Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Webster, R. L. (2017) "The pear-slug," Bulletin: Vol. 11 : No. 130 , Article 1. Available at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/bulletin/vol11/iss130/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Extension and Experiment Station Publications at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bulletin by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Webster: The pear-slug Bulletin No. 130 March, 1912 THE PEAR-SLUG Caliroa cerasi Linn. AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IOWA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND THE MECHANIC ARTS Entomological Section Ames, Iowa Published by Iowa State University Digital Repository, 1911 1 Bulletin, Vol. 11 [1911], No. 130, Art. 1 SUMMARY. 1. The pear-slug, or cherry-slug, is a dark, almost black, slimy slug, about 2-5 of an inch long when full grown, which feeds on cherry, pear and plum leaves. 2. These slugs feed on the upper sides of the leaves, eating out all the tissue except the veins and the lower surface. The injured leaves become dry and brown and fall from the trees, which are sometimes left entirely bare of foliage in midsummer. 3. Trees are often killed as a result of repeated defoliation. A short crop of fruit follows a severe attack by this insect, on ac­ count of the weakened condition of the tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories
    PATHWAYS ANALYSIS OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND INSECTS IN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Project PM 005529 NatureServe Canada K.W. Neatby Bldg 906 Carling Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6 Prepared by Eric Snyder and Marilyn Anions NatureServe Canada for The Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories March 31, 2008 Citation: Snyder, E. and Anions, M. 2008. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories. Report for the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Government of the Northwest Territories. Project No: PM 005529 28 pages, 5 Appendices. Pathways Analysis of Invasive Plants and Insects in the Northwest Territories i NatureServe Canada Acknowledgements NatureServe Canada and the Government of the Northwest Territories, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those who supplied information during the production of this document. Canada : Eric Allen (Canadian Forest Service), Lorna Allen (Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Alberta Community Development, Parks & Protected Areas Division), Bruce Bennett (Yukon Department of Environment), Rhonda Batchelor (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Cristine Bayly (Ecology North listserve), Terri-Ann Bugg (Northwest Territories, Transportation), Doug Campbell (Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre), Suzanne Carrière (Northwest Territories, Environment & Natural Resources), Bill Carpenter (Moraine Point Lodge, Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policy Review
    Draft policy review A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories Supporting your success Draft pest categorisation report Contributing authors Bennington JM Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hammond NE Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hooper RG Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Jackson SL Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Poole MC Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Tuten SJ Senior Policy Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, December 2014 Document citation DAFWA 2015, Draft policy review: A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, South Perth. Copyright© Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2015 Western Australian Government materials, including website pages, documents and online graphics, audio and video are protected by copyright law. Copyright of materials created by or for the Department of Agriculture and Food resides with the Western Australian Agriculture Authority established under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research,
    [Show full text]
  • November 2002
    All the dirt that’s fit to print Newsletter of the Whatcom County Master Gardeners November 2002 Don’t forget to attend the Graduation /Potluck at the Ferndale Senior Center on November 7. It is always a fun event. Bring guests (kids included ) and your favorite dish to share. We will also announce the results of the election. Even if you have not completed all of your hours please come and share a good time. INSIDE: There are many on-going activities that are being worked on all through the winter. There are committees working on advanced training, a new demonstration garden at Bloedel-Donovan Park, Tis the Season volunteer activities, garden trips, etc. So, if you would like to participate in planning any of these or ............................ 2 other activities, join up and give us your ideas! MG Foundation Thanks to all of you who volunteered this year, but we need you to record that time on a sheet of ............................ 3 paper (any kind) and submit it to the office. Good Harvesting, see you at the Graduation! Plant of the Month ............................ 4 Al McHenry Garden Friends & Foes .................... 5 Cover Crops ~Adapted from “The Little Miracles Performed by Cover Crops” by Lee Reich Weed of the Month Cover crops are plants traditionally grown to prevent soil erosion, conserve nutrients and improve ............................ 6 tilth, but they also present exciting alternatives to weeding, hauling mulch, even fertilizing. General Information A dense growth of cover crops can quell weeds by shading them, and cover crops like rye and oats ............................ 7 release weed-suppressing chemicals into the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on APPLES – Fruit Pathway and Alert List
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 5 - REPORT on APPLES – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Wistermann A, Steffen K, Grousset F, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/107o25ccc1b2c DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on Apples – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background on apple .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Data on production and trade of apple fruit ................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Pathway ‘apple fruit’ .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Floristics of Butterleaf National Park, Butterleaf State Conservation Area and the Bezzants Lease
    Vegetation and Floristics of Butterleaf National Park, Butterleaf State Conservation Area and the Bezzants Lease Dr John T. Hunter May 2011 23 Kendall Rd, Invergowrie NSW, 2350 Ph. & Fax: (02) 6775 2452 Email: [email protected] A Report to the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service & the Nature Conservation Trust of NSW i Vegetation of Butterleaf & Bezzants Lease Summary The vegetation of the Butterleaf National Park and State Conservation Area and Bezzant’s Lease is described and mapped (scale 1:25 000). Nine communities and three sub-associations are defined based on classification (Kulczynski association). These eight communities and three sub-associations were mapped based on ground truthing, air photo interpretation and landform. The communities described and their status is: Floristic Community Area Reservation Status C1a: Eucalyptus radiata – E. Not listed as a community of concern though 1,875 ha campanulata – E. obliqua likely a unique association within the area. C1b: Eucalyptus obliqua – E. Not listed as a community of concern. 263 ha brunnea – E. saligna C1c: Eucalyptus campanulata Not listed as a community of concern. 250 ha – E. obliqua – E. saligna C2: Eucalyptus acaciiformis – Likely to be included as an Endangered Angophora floribunda Ecological Community within the Montane 8.7 ha Peatlands and Swamps determination of the TSC Act. C3: Eucalyptus caliginosa – Not listed as a community of concern though E. bridgesiana – E. 433 ha likely a unique association within the area. laevopinea C4: Eucalyptus nova-anglica Would fall within the Endangered Ecological – E. acaciiformis – E. 39.8 ha Community New England Peppermint subtilior Woodland on the TSC and EPBC Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Backyard Pest Management: Pests of Small Fruit
    Pests of Small Fruits – 1 – Introduction Managing common insects, weeds, plant diseases and certain animal pests found in the backyard can be a challenge. However, there are a number of ways to approach the problem. Information in this publication will help identify and manage pest problems. Pest management methods will vary among individuals according to their tolerance of the pest, the damage and a basic philosophy about handling pest problems. It may not be necessary to control pests if numbers are low and damage is not significant.At other times, simply spraying a tree with water, pruning a branch or digging up a weed will reduce or eliminate the problem. Natural predators may also control the pest problem. Backyard Pest Management is designed to help focus on the key areas of pest management. The first section provides basic approaches to pest management and looks at ways to prevent problems and handle them as they arise. Further sections focus focus on the insects and the types of plants they damage. There are many ways to deal with backyard pest problems. When using pesticides to control a problem, there is the potential for damage and the possibility of legal issues. Use pesticides with caution and always according to label directions. Approaches to Pest Management Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is an environmentally responsible approach to pest management. IPM focuses on prevention, and if problems occur, the method provides a variety of control strategies. Prevention Prevention is the foundation of an IPM program, and one way to do prevent problems is to choose the right plant for a specific location and provide the best growing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Currant “Worm”
    The Current Currant “Worm” By Virgene Link-New July 3, 2020 Damaging predators take advantage of warmer weather We are eager in spring to see buds opening and flowers blooming after a dark, mostly rainy winter. Sometimes in spring when we venture out on a nicer day we are met with the surprise of our currant leaves being reduced to veins, a mere skeleton of themselves. The imported currantworm (Nematus ribesii) is a sawfly larva that feeds on and skeletonizes currant and gooseberry leaves. It is neither a “saw” nor a “fly,” but a member of the order Hymenoptera (ants, bees and wasps). The adult wasp has a thick, broadly joined waist and looks very much like a fly, but with two pair of wings. Flies (Diptera) have one pair of wings. The female has a saw-like ovipositor (a tubular organ through which a female insect deposits eggs), hence the name “sawfly.” She uses this to insert eggs into plant tissue, usually along the veins beneath the leaf. It does NOT have a stinger. We rarely notice the adult of this species as it is small, about one-third inch in length and is black and yellow. Adults are usually found on flowers. The larvae look like a butterfly or moth caterpillars with a recognizable “head” and soft body, but there are noticeable differences to the specialist. The larvae emerge from the newly opened currant leaves. They grow rapidly and can completely defoliate the plant almost overnight if action is not taken. Larvae are whitish at first and then become green with black spots as they mature to about one-half inch.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Fruit Growers' Association of Ontario for the Year
    KEPORT % OF THE it <&to\vm %tMti*ti»u OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, FOR THE YEAR 1811 TO WHICH IS APPENDED THE g«al IScjjort at i|e (Jntomolajbl Swcretg OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO, FOB THE YEAR 1877. grinM fen ®x&tt ot tl« ifflislatiw §>mmUq. f •$ I ontreal Horticultural $otteto " a y or c^ I AND $ I i Fruit Growers Association of the Province of Quebec. i LIBRAE* OF BKFEBKJf»/ *V. *,££&_ Presented by { & Tlii* Volume is not allowed to betaken out of the Library. a# BROCK UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE ONTARIO APPLE Drawn from NarurE byJ.EIIis. Prinred by. R.H.Ghidley & Go. Toronto. LIBRARY OF THE ^iruit (fowmtt* ^uuhinw OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO FOR THE YEAR 1877. ® ^xinttA bjj ®t&tv tsi th* f$ejtelatiw Mm\M& koc^ J '^S^V»&9rV J 5P| "^SC__J»<---?_^_5 IS17 fforotto : PRINTED BY HUNTER, ROSE & CO., 25 WELLINi3TTON STREET WEST 1878. INDEX. PAGE PAGE Address, Annual, by the President 4 Apples for European market 15 Adirondac Grape 32 Apples at Arkona 35 Alvey Grape 32 Aphis on the Cherry 8 Annual Meeting 2 Arnold's Hybrid Apple "Ontario"...- 78 Annual Prizes 78 Auditor's Report 12 Apple Crop of 1877 1 Autuchon Grape 32 Apple blight 11 Autumn Meeting, 1877 22 Apples worthy of cultivation 22 Autumn Meeting for 1878 78 Barry Grape 31, 33 Black Strawberry -Beetle 7 Best Raspberries 16 Black knot 8 Best Six Grapes 16, 17 Bradt's Russet 17, 36 Best varieties of Apple 22 Bucke's, P. E., Paper on Irrigation 13 E., Prize Best kinds of Pear , 23 Bucke's, P.
    [Show full text]