Natural Heritage Evaluation and Records Review

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Heritage Evaluation and Records Review CCOONNEESSTTOOGGOO WWIINNDD FFAARRMM RECORDS REVIEW AND NATURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION ONTARIO REGULATION 359/09 prepared for GENIVAR Inc. on behalf of NEXTERA ENERGY DECEMBER 2010 LGL PROJECT TA4914-02 CCOONNEESSTTOOGGOO WWIINNDD FFAARRMM RECORDS REVIEW AND NATURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION ONTARIO REGULATION 359/09 prepared by: Digital signature Digital signature J. Arnel Fausto Allison Featherstone Senior Ecologist, Vice President Planning Ecologist Digital signature Digital signature Jen Noël Robert Nisbet Botanist, ISA Certified Arborist Senior Wildlife Biologist LGL Limited environmental research associates 3365 Harvester Road Burlington, Ontario L7N 3N2 Tel: 905-333-1667 Fax: 905-333-2660 Email: [email protected] URL: www.lgl.com DECEMBER 2010 LGL PROJECT TA4914-02 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 CURRENT LAND USE .......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 RECORDS REVIEW...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 RECORDS RELATED TO PROVINCIAL PARKS AND CONSERVATION RESERVES ................................................................... 3 2.2 RECORDS RELATED TO NATURAL FEATURES ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2.1 Ministry of Natural Resources Records .................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1.1 Ministry of Natural Resources......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1.2. Ontario Wind Resources Atlas ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Crown Land .............................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.3 Conservation Authority Records .............................................................................................................. 6 2.2.3.1 Grand River Information Network (GRIN) Interactive Mapping...................................................................... 6 2.2.3.2 Lake Erie Source Protection Characterization Report ..................................................................................... 6 2.2.3.3 Watershed Forest Plan .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3.4 Land Use Planning Policy................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2.4 Upper Tier Municipality Records .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.5 Lower Tier Municipality Records .............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.6 Planning Board Records ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.7 Municipal Planning Authority Records ..................................................................................................... 9 2.2.8 Local Roads Board Records ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.9 Local Services Board Records ................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.10 Niagara Escarpment Plan Records ...................................................................................................... 9 2.3 KEY FINDINGS OF THE RECORDS REVIEW ................................................................................................................ 9 3.0 SITE INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.1 PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 SIGNIFICANT VALLEYLANDS ............................................................................................................................... 14 3.3 VEGETATION AND VEGETATION COMMUNITIES ..................................................................................................... 15 3.4 WILDLIFE HABITAT AND COMMUNITIES ............................................................................................................... 24 3.4.1 Birds ....................................................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.2 Reptiles and Amphibians........................................................................................................................ 25 3.4.3 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................... 26 3.4.4 Bats ........................................................................................................................................................ 26 3.4.5 Plants/Vegetation ...................................................................................................................................... 26 3.5 SPECIES AT RISK SCREENING AND CONFIRMATION.................................................................................................. 27 3.6 SUMMARY OF CORRECTIONS BASED ON SITE INVESTIGATIONS ................................................................................. 28 4.0 EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1 REA REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 37 4.2 SIGNIFICANT NATURAL FEATURES ........................................................................................................................ 37 4.2.1 Significant Woodlands ........................................................................................................................... 43 4.2.1.1 Evaluation of Significance ............................................................................................................................. 44 4.2.2 Significant Wildlife Habitat .................................................................................................................... 46 4.2.3 Significant Wetlands .............................................................................................................................. 52 4.2.3.1 Evaluation of Significance ..................................................................................................................................... 52 4.3 Evaluation of Significance Methodology, Criteria and Procedures for Valleylands ............................... 58 4.4 Public and Aboriginal Consultation Input to Evaluation of Significance ................................................ 59 4.4.1 Aboriginal Communities .................................................................................................................................... 59 4.4.2 Public Consultation ............................................................................................................................................ 59 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES ...................... 60 5.1 Prohibited Areas .................................................................................................................................... 60 6.0 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 66 7.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 67 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Natural Heritage Information Centre Rare Species Records Table 2 Natural Features identified in project location through records review Table 3 Summary of Site Investigations for the Project Team Table 4 Site Assessment Details for Valleylands within 120m of Project Location Table 5 Summary of Natural Features, Attributes, Composition and Functions for Features Identified within 120m of Project Components Table 6 Summary of Site Investigations and Evaluation of Significance for Significant Wildlife Habitat within 120m of Project Components Table 7 Aquatic Species at Risk Assessment and Confirmation Table 8 Vegetation Species at Risk Assessment and Confirmation Table 9 Wildlife Species at Risk Assessment and Confirmation Table 10 Site Investigation Summary for Determining Significance of Natural Features Table 11 Site Assessment and Evaluation of Significance Details for Woodlands within 120m of Project Location Table 12 Woodland Evaluation Criteria and Methodology Table 13 Evaluation of Significance of Woodlands within the Conestogo Wind Farm Project Location using Criteria from the MNR Natural Heritage
Recommended publications
  • Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome
    www.trca.on.ca Glen Haffy Conservation Area Welcome to Glen Haffy Conservation Area, a beautiful natural area located within the Humber River Watershed, Humber River Watershed Fishing at Glen Haffy at the junction of Ontario’s two most dominant The Humber River watershed covers an area of 903 square Each year, Glen Haffy raises 60,000 rainbow trout at its on-site geological features - The Niagara Escarpment and kilometres, from the headwaters on the Niagara Escarpment fish hatchery, and these fish are released into the fishing the Oak Ridges Moraine. and Oak Ridges Moraine down to Lake Ontario. The watershed ponds at Glen Haffy Conservation Area, the Glen Haffy Fly provides many benefits to the people who live within it including Fishing Club and Heart Lake Conservation Area. The proceeds Glen Haffy Conservation Area is a 189 hectare Toronto drinking water, solace, renewal and contact with nature. generated by angling fees help fund the fish rearing program. and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) property with great hiking trails you can escape into. Oak Ridges Moraine Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club The Oak Ridges Moraine stretches as a ridge of hilly terrain for Join the Glen Haffy Fly Fishing Club, escape into 160 kilometres from the Niagara Escarpment in the west to the tranquility and enjoy: headwaters of the Trent River in the east. Rain that is collected and stored in the moraine’s vast underground layers of sand and • Access to private gated Headwaters Ponds located on 600 gravel, which are known as aquifers, eventually resurfaces as acres of prestine conservation lands Become a healthy, clean water that feeds the majority of river systems in • Use of Row Boats, Docks and Log Cabin Conservation the Greater Toronto Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto and Region Watersheds Report Card 2013
    Facts and Figures What We Are Doing What You Can Do Where We Are Municipalities Toronto, Peel, York, Durham, Adjala - Tosorontio, Ajax, • Farm and other rural non-farm private landowners in the Regions of Peel and York have • Divert your downspouts away from paved areas and install a rain barrel to capture We are one of Aurora, Brampton, Caledon, King, Markham, Mississauga, been capping abandoned wells, fencing livestock out of watercourses, building proper and reuse the rainwater that falls on your roof. This reduces run-off to sewers, 36 Conservation Mono, Pickering, Richmond Hill, Uxbridge, Whitchurch - manure storage facilities and undertaking other best management practices under TRCA’s prevents flooding and saves money on your water bill. Authorities across Stouffville, Vaughan Rural Clean Water Quality Program and the Peel Rural Clean Water Program. Toronto and Region Ontario under Watercourses Etobicoke Creek, Mimico Creek, Humber River, Don River, • Reduce or eliminate the use of salt, pesticides and fertilizers, which contaminate the umbrella organization of Rouge River, Highland Creek, Petticoat Creek, Duffins Creek, • From 2008 to 2012, TRCA and its volunteers have planted 1,718,270 native trees, rivers, ponds and groundwater supplies. Carruthers Creek Watersheds Conservation shrubs and aquatic plants within TRCA’s watersheds. Healthy forests provide habitat Ontario. Longest Reach of River/Creek (km) Etobicoke Creek – 59, Mimico Creek – 34, for wildlife, help cool urban areas, retain water and reduce run-off, and capture CO • Decommission old wells on your property and maintain your septic system regularly (including Waterfront) Humber River – 126, Don River – 52, Rouge River – 58, 2 Highland Creek – 26, Petticoat Creek – 16, from the air to reduce impacts of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenspace Acquisition Project 2021-2030
    Attachment 3: GAP 2021-2030 Greenspace Acquisition Project 2021-2030 Prepared by Property and Risk Management Business Unit November 2020 Greenspace Acquisition Project 2021-2030 Table of Contents List of Boxes ................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................. ii Land Acknowledgement ................................................................................................ iii Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Resolution ............................................... iii Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Greenspace Securement .................................................................................... 2 1.2 Policy and Planning Context ............................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Province of Ontario ...................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority ................................................ 4 1.3 Land Management ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Ground
    Creating Common Ground TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 2010 ANNUAL REPORT TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 2010 ANNUAL REPORT I OUR VISION OUR MISSION The quality of life on Earth is being created in rapidly To work with our partners to ensure that The expanding city regions. Our vision is for a new kind of Living City® is built upon a natural foundation community—The Living City®—where human settlement of healthy rivers and shorelines, greenspace and can flourish forever as part of nature’s beauty and diversity. biodiversity, and sustainable communities. II TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 2010 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR 2 FEATURE STORIES MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER 3 WESTERN GATEWAY: Rebuilt trail reconnects waterfronts in Toronto and Pickering 6 HEALTHY RIVERS AND SHORELINES 4 Watersheds 4 LAKE ONTARIO EVENINGS: Lake Ontario Waterfront 4 New speakers’ series attracts committed audience 7 Etobicoke and Mimico Creeks 6 Humber River 8 PARTNERS IN PROJECT GREEN: Don River 13 Collaboration produces faster results at lower costs 9 Rouge River and Rouge Park 15 ROUGE DAYS 2010: Duffins, Carruthers and Petticoat Creeks 19 The biggest watershed celebration in the GTA 16 Highland Creek 21 Watershed Planning and Management 24 BOB HUNTER MEMORIAL PARK: Source Water Protection 30 TRCA works with Rouge Park and York Region to restore park 17 Stormwater Management 30 SUNNY DAYS FOR CONSERVATION: Flood Management 31 Fundraiser boosts conservation in Western Durham 21 REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Statement Update
    GUIDING SOLUTIONS IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Environmental Impact Study 1985 - 1999 Altona Road, City of Pickering (Part of Lot 32, Concession 1) Prepared For: 702153 Ontario Limited Prepared By: Beacon Environmental Limited Date: Project: June 2016 215476.1 Revised January 2018 MARKHAM BRACEBRIDGE GUELPH PETERBOROUGH OTTAWA 80 Main St. North 126 Kimberley Avenue 373 Woolwich Street 305 Reid Street 470 Somerset Street West Markham, ON L3P 1X5 Bracebridge, ON P1L 1Z9 Guelph, ON N1H 3W4 Peterborough, ON K9J 3R2 Ottawa, ON K1R 5J8 T)905.201.7622 F)905.201.0639 T)705.645.1050 F)705.645.6639 T)519.826.0419 F)519.826.9306 T) 705.243.7251 T) 613.627.2376 1 9 8 5 - 1999 Altona Road EIS Table of Contents p a g e 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 2. Policy Review ............................................................................................... 1 2.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2014) ............................................................................... 1 2.2 Regional Municipality of Durham Official Plan (Consolidation 2015) ............................. 2 2.3 City of Pickering Official Plan (Consolidation 2010) ...................................................... 3 2.3.1 City of Pickering Rouge Park Neighbourhood Development Guidelines (2003) ............. 4 2.4 Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Regulations (2006) .................................. 4 2.4.1 TRCA Living City Policies for Planning and Development (2014) .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Ridges Moraine Aquifer Vulnerability Areas
    MAP 7 Lake Simcoe OAK RIDGES MORAINE AQUIFER Georgina Island I.R. Georgina Island I.R. VULNERABILITY AREAS Georgina Creeks AND WATERSHED Watershed !48 BOUNDARIES Town of Old Homestead Road Georgina Cook's Woodbine Avenue Oak Ridges Moraine Conservation Plan Bay Pollock Road Pefferlaw Brook Maskinonge River Watershed Area of High Aquifer Watershed Vulnerability Old Shiloh Road Uxbridge Brook McCowan Road Park Road Ravenshoe Road Weir's Sideroad Watershed Area of Low Aquifer Vulnerability Boag Road Black River Watershed Lake Simcoe Oak Ridges Moraine Boundary Leslie Street Ë Warden Avenue Watershed Boundaries Town of Kennedy Road Watershed Provincial Highways East Gwillimbury Queensville Sideroad Y Existing o ng e Doane Road S East Townline East t r e Controlled Access Highway e t Mount Albert Road East Holland Under Construction Watershed Herald Road Green Lane COUNTY OF SIMCOE Municipal Boundary Davis Drive 9 Davis Drive West ! Town of 19th Sideroad West Holland Mulock Drive Vivian Road Watershed Newmarket McCowan Road 18th Sideroad St John's Sideroad Dufferin Street Bathurst Street Pefferlaw Brook 12th Concession Town of Watershed 17th Sideroad Aurora Aurora Road 7th Concession Keele Street Township 16th Sideroad Vandorf Sideroad 11th Concession of King Town of 15th Sideroad Bloomington Road Whitchurch- Stouffville King Road Bethesda Sideroad 10th Concession THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEEL DuffinsNinth Line Creek 8th Concession 400 404 ! 48 Watershed ! Stouffville Road ! Kirby Road 19th Avenue Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    Executive Committee Meeting Agenda #11/19 February 7, 2020 9:30 A.M. HEAD OFFICE, 101 EXCHANGE AVENUE, VAUGHAN Members: Chair Jennifer Innis Vice-Chair Jack Heath Paul Ainslie Ronald Chopowick Dipika Damerla Joanne Dies Jennifer Drake Paula Fletcher Gordon Highet Linda Jackson Cynthia Lai Anthony Perruzza Pages 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INDIGENOUS TERRITORY 2. MINUTES OF MEETING #10/19, HELD ON JANUARY 10, 2020 Meeting Minutes 3. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. DELEGATIONS 5. PRESENTATIONS 6. CORRESPONDENCE 7. SECTION I - ITEMS FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACTION 7.1 VOLUNTARY PROJECT REVIEW 4 Works Undertaken by Organizations Exempt from Ontario Regulation 166/06, As Amended 8. SECTION II - ITEMS FOR EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTION 9. SECTION III - ITEMS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE BOARD 9.1 2020 GENERAL AND CAPITAL LEVY UPDATE 9 9.2 2020 UNFUNDED PRIORITIES 12 9.3 2019 YEAR END FUNDING AND GRANTS UPDATE 19 9.4 Q4 2019 COMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY 27 10. SECTION IV - ONTARIO REGULATION 166/06, AS AMENDED MAJOR PERMIT APPLICATION 10.1– REGULAR – FOR APPROVAL Applications that involved a more complex suite of technical studies to demonstrate consistency with policies; applications that cover a significant geographic area, extensive modifications to the landscape, major infrastructure projects, applications requiring specific conditions and permissions that extend beyond two years. CITY OF PICKERING 10.1 2399478 ONTARIO INC. C/O MARSHALL HOMES 38 To site grade and temporarily or permanently place, dump or remove any material, originating on the site or elsewhere on Lot 2, 3, Plan 388, (1956 Altona Road), in the City of Pickering, Petticoat Creek Watershed as located on the property owned by 2399478 Ontario Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Great Lakes Strategy
    Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy 2012 Prepared by: The Government of Ontario December 2012 For more information on Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy, visit the Ministry of the Environment at: Ontario.ca/environment or call 1-800-565-4923 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2012 Disponible en francais PIBS 9198e Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy ..............................................................................................1 Overview ................................................................................................................................2 Why We Need Action to Protect the Great Lakes ..................................................................5 Why The Great Lakes Matter to the People of Ontario ..........................................................9 Building On Ontario’s Great Lakes Accomplishments .........................................................13 Where We Are Headed: A Great Lakes Strategy for Action .................................................30 The Vision ..........................................................................................................................30 Great Lakes Goals .............................................................................................................30 Principles ...........................................................................................................................31 Ontario’s Great Lakes Goals 1: Engaging and Empowering Communities .....................................................................32
    [Show full text]
  • Year End Funding and Grants Program Update.Pdf
    Attachment 1: Year-End Funding and Grant Program Update Approved/ Funding Program Project Title Project Status Requested Amount ($000s) Grants Under Review Celebrate Canada - Canadian Heritage Caledon Canada Day at Albion Hills Under Review 50 Community Museum Operating Grant Black Creek Pioneer Village Under Review 221 (CMOG) - Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Energy Manager Program - Natural 1. Hiring an energy manager in a building or an Under Review 196 Resources Canada industrial facility 2. Conducting an energy assessment and scope of Grassland Stewardship Initiative - Grasslands Brock North Grasslands Under Review 500 Ontario Grassland Stewardship Initiative - Grasslands Claireville Intermodal Grassland Restoration Under Review 554 Ontario Intact Foundation Adaptation Action Grant - Ontario Climate Consortium: Scaling Municipal Under Review 334 Intact Insurance Corporate and Community Climate Change Risk Assessments and Adaptation Action Intact Foundation Adaptation Action Grant - The Meadoway: Urban Greenspace Revitalization Under Review 400 Intact Insurance Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program Albion Hills - Construction of an Outdoor Community Under Review 1,978 (ICIP): Community, Culture, and Recreation Recreation Event Space Stream - Infrastructure Canada Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program Black Creek Pioneer Village - Accessibility and Under Review 1,425 (ICIP): Community, Culture, and Recreation Infrastructure Improvements Stream - Infrastructure Canada Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program Bolton Camp - Reconstruction
    [Show full text]
  • Redside Dace (Clinostomus Elongatus) in the Greater Toronto Area Over Time
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the redside dace Clinostomus elongatus in Canada ENDANGERED 2007 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the redside dace Clinostomus elongatus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 59 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous report: Parker, B., Mckee, P. and Campbell, R.R. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the redside dace Clinostomus elongatus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-20 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Erling Holm and Alan Dextrase for writing the update status report on the redside dace Clinostomus elongates in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Dr. Robert Campbell, Co-chair, COSEWIC Freshwater Fishes Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le méné long (Clinostomus elongatus) au Canada – Mise à jour. Cover illustration: Redside dace — Drawing by Anker Odum, from Scott and Crossman (1998) by permission. ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2007 Catalogue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturalmappickeringapril2014.Pdf
    A Cultural Map of Pickering Background Information Draft ● March 2014 City of Pickering Cultural Strategic Plan (draft) 2014 Contents 1 Community Profile 4 1.1 Geography and Environment 5 1.1.1 Petticoat Creek Watershed 7 1.1.2 Frenchman’s Bay Watershed 7 1.1.3 Duffins Creek and Carruthers Creek Watershed 9 1.1.4 Lynde Creek Watershed 9 1.1.5 Community Environmental and Sustainability Initiatives 9 1.2 Pickering’s Settlement Areas 11 1.2.1 Downtown and Urban Pickering 11 1.2.2 Rural Pickering 12 1.3 Pickering’s History 15 1.4 Demographic Profile 18 1.5 Economy and Education 21 1.6 Natural, Recreational, Cultural, and Tourism Assets in Pickering 22 1.7 Pickering’s Cultural Organizations 25 2 Summary of Research Findings and Public Input 26 2.1 Community Telephone Survey 27 2.1.1 Household Survey Analysis 28 2.1.2 Household Participation in Heritage, Arts, and Culture Activities 29 2.1.3 Participation Location 30 2.1.4 Household Attendance at Heritage, Arts, and Culture Activities 31 2.1.5 Attendance Location 32 2.1.6 Desired Programs and Activities 33 2.1.7 Awareness 33 2.1.8 Barriers to Participation 33 2.1.9 Household Spending on Heritage, Arts, and Culture 34 2.1.10 Satisfaction with and Importance of Current Heritage, Arts, and Culture Opportunities 35 2.1.11 Additional Spending of Public Funds 37 2.1.12 Awareness and Roles of the City, Community, and Private Businesses 38 1 City of Pickering Cultural Strategic Plan (draft) 2014 City of Pickering Cultural Strategic Plan (draft) 2014 2.2 Stakeholder Group Survey 41 This document incorporates the findings of the cultural mapping and community consultation 2.2.1 Baseline Information 44 exercises launched in support of the Pickering Cultural Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]