DOCSLIB.ORG

Composite Pavements and Exposed Aggregate Texturing at Mnroad: Cells 70, 71, and 72 Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Composite Pavements and Exposed Aggregate Texturing at Mnroad: Cells 70, 71, and 72 Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation Composite Pavements and Exposed Aggregate Texturing at MnROAD: Cells 70, 71, and 72 Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation Alexandra Akkari, Principal Investigator Oce of Materials and Road Research Minnesota Department of Transportation October 2012 Research Project Final Report MN/RC 2012-29 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2012-29 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Composite Pavements and Exposed Aggregate October 2012 Texturing at MnROAD: Cells 70, 71 and 72 6. Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Alexandra Akkari, Bernard Izevbekhai 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Materials and Road Research 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 1400 Gervais Avenue Maplewood MN, 55109 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) This report summarizes the construction and early performance assessment of three composite (new, multi-layer, construction) test cells at the MnROAD: HMA over a recycled aggregate concrete; diamond grind concrete over recycled aggregate concrete; and exposed aggregate concrete over a low cost concrete. The compilation of this report is strictly a MnDOT activity that documents construction and instrumentation of concrete cells at our MnROAD facility and should not be misconstrued for a SHRP 2 activity. Strength, on board sound intensity, sound absorption, friction, texture and international roughness index were tested to better understand the performance of these, pavement types. Results suggest that the exposed aggregate concrete surface does not provide significant noise reduction. Exposed aggregate surfacing can provide more than adequate friction for skid resistance and safety. Overall, however, these two lift concrete pavements proved to address issues such as high cost of virgin aggregates and high trucking costs for areas that don’t have quality aggregates to use. Continued monitoring of these test cells will help develop the extensive understanding of composite pavements needed for effective design and accurate service life models. 17. Document Analysis/Descriptors 18. Availability Statement No restriction. Document available from: National Technical Information Services, Springfield, Virginia 22161 19. Security Class (this report) 20. Security Class (this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified Composite Pavements at MnROAD: Cells 70, 71 and 72 Construction Report and Early Performance Evaluation Prepared by Alexandra Akkari Bernard Izevbekhai Office of Materials and Road Research Minnesota Department of Transportation October 2012 Published by Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services Section Transportation Bldg. 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mail Stop 330 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 This report represents the results of research conducted by the authors and does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. It is not a SHRP 2 report. This report does not contain a standard or specified technique. The authors and the Minnesota Department of Transportation do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to this report. Acknowledgements We acknowledge Mark Watson and MnROAD Operations Staff who assisted with the documentation that facilitated rendition of this construction report. We are also indebted to Maureen Jensen and Keith Shannon for their continued encouragement of innovative research. Bernard Igbafen Izevbekhai, P.E., Ph.D. Research Operations Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation 1400 Gervais Avenue Maplewood MN 55109 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 651 3665454 Fax: 6513665461 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 Lessons Learned.......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION TO COMPOSITE PAVEMENTS .............................................................. 4 PROJECT OVERVIEW AND DESIGN .................................................................................... 6 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Project Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 Existing Cell Condition............................................................................................................... 8 Cell Design.................................................................................................................................. 9 Instrumentation ......................................................................................................................... 15 SECTION 2.................................................................................................................................. 19 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE ............................................................................................... 19 Mainline Pre-Construction and Demo Slab Paving .................................................................. 19 Mainline Paving Construction .................................................................................................. 23 Time Lag between Lifts ............................................................................................................ 30 SECTION 3.................................................................................................................................. 35 EARLY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ............................................................................ 35 Compressive, Flexural and Bond Strength ............................................................................... 35 On Board Sound Intensity ......................................................................................................... 39 Sound Absorption ..................................................................................................................... 43 Friction ...................................................................................................................................... 47 Texture ...................................................................................................................................... 49 International Roughness Index ................................................................................................. 50 ‘Warp and Curl’ ........................................................................................................................ 53 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 56 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 58 APPENDIX A ................................................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX C ................................................................................................................................ 1 APPENDIX D ................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Figures Figure 1: Cell Composition ........................................................................................................... 10 Figure 2: Aggregate Gradations .................................................................................................... 11 Figure 3: Instrumentation Layout Cross-section........................................................................... 17 Figure 4: Instrumentation Layout – Cell 70 .................................................................................. 18 Figure 5: Instrumentation Layout – Cells 71 and 72 .................................................................... 18 Figure 6: PCC Removal ................................................................................................................ 19 Figure 7: (a) Sensor Conduit Installation and (b) Subgrade Compaction ..................................... 20 Figure 8: (a) Demo Slab Construction and (b) Demo Slab Bottom Lift ....................................... 21 Figure 9: Demo Slab Construction ............................................................................................... 22 Figure 10: Demo Slab Finished Surface ....................................................................................... 22 Figure 11: MnROAD Mainline Cell 70 – Lower Lift Construction ............................................ 24 Figure 12: MnROAD Mainlne Cell 71 Construction ................................................................... 25 Figure 13: (a) Fresh Concrete Testing and (b) MnROAD Mainline Cell
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mechanical Properties of Brick Containing Recycled Concrete Aggregate and Polyethylene Terephthalate Waste As Sand Replacement
    E3S Web of Conferences 34, 01001 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183401001 CENVIRON 2017 The mechanical properties of brick containing recycled concrete aggregate and polyethylene terephthalate waste as sand replacement Faisal Sheikh Khalid1*, Nurul Bazilah Azmi1, Puteri Natasya Mazenan1, Shahiron Shahidan1, and Noorwirdawati Ali1 1Jamilus Research Centre for Sustainable Construction (JRC), Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia Abstract. This research focuses on the performance of composite sand cement brick containing recycle concrete aggregate and waste polyethylene terephthalate. This study aims to determine the mechanical properties such as compressive strength and water absorption of composite brick containing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste. The bricks specimens were prepared by using 100% natural sand, they were then replaced by RCA at 25%, 50% and 75% with proportions of PET consists of 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% by weight of natural sand. Based on the results of compressive strength, only RCA 25% with 0.5% PET achieve lower strength than normal bricks while others showed a high strength. However, all design mix reaches strength more than 7N/mm2 as expected. Besides that, the most favorable mix design that achieves high compressive strength is 75% of RCA with 0.5% PET. 1 Introduction Cement and sand bricks are a type of bricks that is commonly used in low and medium cost housing development and other commercial constructions in Malaysia since it is easy to produce and cheap [1]. However, there is an issue in producing these materials especially in developing areas where manufactures find it difficult to locate adequate sources of natural cement and aggregate supply [2-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Partial Replacement of Aggregate with Ceramic Tile in Concrete
    A PROJECT REPORT ON “PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE WITH CERAMIC TILE IN CONCRETE” SUBMITTED TO JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BY G.SAI CHAND (15KQ1D8705) Under The Esteemed Guidance Of Mr. P.RAVI KUMAR, M.Tech ASST.PROFESSOR, DEPT OF CE. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING PACE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES (AFFLIATED TO JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA & ACCRIDATED BY NAAC ‘A’ GRADE & AN ISO 9001-2008 CERTIFIED INSTITUTION) VALLUR,PRAKASAM(Dt). 2015-2017 PACE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES, VALLUR DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE This is to certify that the project work “PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE WITH CERAMIC TILE IN CONCRETE” Submitted by G.SAI CHAND , is examined and adjusted as sufficient as a partial requirement for the MASTER DEGREE IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING at Jawaharlal Nehru Technological university, Kakinada is a bonafide record of the work done by student under my guidance and supervision. Project Guide Head of the Department P.RAVI KUMAR , M.Tech, G.GANESH NAIDU,M.Tech,(P.hd) Asst. Professor Asst. Professor & HOD, DEPARTMENT OF CE DEPARTMENT OF CE Principal Dr. C.V.SUBBA RAO, M.Tech , Phd. PROJECT EXTERNAL EXAMINER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to take this opportunity to express my heartiest concern of words to all those people who have helped me in various ways to complete my project. I express my profound gratitude to my Project guide Mr.P.RAVI KUMAR, M.Tech, Asst.Professor, Department of CE for his valuable and inspiring guidance, comments, and encouragements throughout the course of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuse of Ceramic Waste As Aggregate in Concrete
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | July-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Reuse of Ceramic Waste as Aggregate in Concrete Prof. Shruthi. H. G1, Prof. Gowtham Prasad. M. E2 Samreen Taj3, Syed Ruman Pasha4 Assistant professor, Department of Civil Engineering, ATME College of Engineering, Mysuru, INDIA Assistant professor & head, Department of Civil Engineering, Don Bosco Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, INDIA UG – Scholars, Department of Civil Engineering, ATME College of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka, INDIA Abstract - The reuse of ceramic waste as a substitute for Chemical and Physical degradation forces. Ceramic tile coarse aggregate in concrete has been investigated. The aggregate are hard having considered value of specific ceramic wastes are of three types, namely Tiles, Clay bricks gravity, rough surface on one side and smooth on other and flowerpot were used. This study intends to use of ceramic side, are lighter in weight than normal stone tile aggregate in concrete production. Ceramic tiles were aggregates. Using ceramic tiles as aggregate in concrete obtained from manufacturing industries, from construction not only will be cost effective but also will be good from and demolition sites, this cause’s environmental pollution. The environmental point of view. utilization of crushed tile as a coarse aggregate in concrete would also have a positive effect on the economy. Therefore, The following section gives a brief background reuse of these ceramic wastes in concrete production could be and some of the important pertinent studies that were an effective measure in maintaining the environment and improving the properties of concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Overview and History of the Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate
    Chapter 1 Overview and History of the Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate Industry April 2007 Expanded Shale, Clay & Slate Institute (ESCSI) 2225 E. Murray Holladay Rd, Suite 102 Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 (801) 272-7070 Fax: (801) 272-3377 [email protected] www.escsi.org CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction 1.2 How it started 1.3 Beginnings of the Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate (ESCS) Industry 1.4 What is Rotary Kiln Produced ESCS Lightweight Aggregate? 1.5 What is Lightweight Concrete? 1.6 Marine Structures The Story of the Selma Powell River Concrete Ships Concrete Ships of World War II (1940-1947) Braddock Gated Dam Off Shore Platforms 1.7 First Building Using Structural Lightweight Concrete 1.8 Growth of the ESCS Industry 1.9 Lightweight Concrete Masonry Units Advantages of Lightweight Concrete Masonry Units 1.10 High Rise Building Parking Structures 1.11 Precast-Prestressed Lightweight Concrete 1.12 Thin Shell Construction 1.13 Resistance to Nuclear Blast 1.14 Design Flexibility 1.15 Floor and Roof Fill 1.16 Bridges 1.17 Horticulture Applications 1.18 Asphalt Surface Treatment and Hotmix Applications 1.19 A World of Uses – Detailed List of Applications SmartWall® High Performance Concrete Masonry Asphalt Pavement (Rural, City and Freeway) Structural Concrete (Including high performance) Geotechnical Horticulture Applications Specialty Concrete Miscellaneous Appendix 1A ESCSI Information Sheet #7600 “Expanded Shale, Clay and Slate- A World of Applications…Worldwide 1-1 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this reference manual (RM) is to provide information on the practical application of expanded shale, clay and slate (ESCS) lightweight aggregates.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Plastic Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) As a Coarse Aggregate Alternative in Paving Block
    MATEC Web of Conferences 280, 04007 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf /201928004007 ICSBE 2018 Utilization of Plastic Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) as a Coarse Aggregate Alternative in Paving Block Wiku A. Krasna1,*, Rijali Noor1, and Denny D. Ramadani2 1 Lecturer of Faculty of Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia 2 Student of Faculty of Engineering, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Abstract. PET plastic waste is found everywhere in Banjarbaru City compared to other plastic wastes. It is an excellent prospect to reuse the PET plastic waste. The demand of mountain rock and stone from natural resources increases as happened in Aranio Sub District, Banjar Regency. This research is expected to find one way of suppressing the growth of the number of stone mines or natural stone. Based on SNI 03-0691-1996, the classification of the paving block differentiated according to its usage class, one of which is the C quality used by pedestrians. PET waste used as a coarse aggregate previously processed into aggregate with the ratio of cement material, fine aggregate, a coarse aggregate of 1:6:4. PET waste is processed by melting PET and forming into aggregates. The paving with PET waste process by a hydraulic press machine and tested for strength after 28 days. The result of weight measurement with the specimen increases the amount of PET in the paving block mixture, the paving weight decreases as well as the compressive strength. 1 Preliminary 1.1 Background Natural resources are one of the essential assets for country’s/national development. Therefore, should be utilized as widely as possible for the interests of the people with attention to sustainability [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Shapes and Sizes Regular C.M.U
    SUPERLITE ® BLOCK An Oldcastle® Company CONTENTS Introduction . 2 Fire Resistance . 3 Control Joints . 4 Control Joint Slot . 5 Sound Reduction . 6 Compressive Strength of Masonry . 7 Weight Classifications and Aggregates . 8 Integrally Colored C.M.U. 9 Abbreviations . 10 Shapes and Sizes Regular C.M.U. 11 Splitface Block . 25 Slump Block . 31 Founders Finish . 35 Vertical Scored Block . 40 Sonora Block . 45 Fluted Block . 48 Fence Block . 51 Decorative Block . 54 The Integra® Wall System . 55 Keystone® Retaining Wall System . 57 Belgard® Pavers . 59 Mortar Joints . 63 Corner Details . 65 Wall Patterns . 67 NCMA TEK’S Manuals & E-Details are available @ www.superliteblock.com 1 SUPERLITE ® BLOCK An Oldcastle® Company INTRODUCTION Superlite Block’s Shapes and Sizes Directory aims to assist you in the design process. The various types of concrete masonry units available featured, as well as the Integra® Wall System, Keystone® Retaining Walls, and Belgard® Pavers. In conjunction with the shapes and sizes, we have included technical information we hope will be of assistance. Some of the products featured in the Directory are available only on a special order basis. Superlite Block is proud to provide owners, architects, engineers and contractors with high quality masonry units for all your design needs. Please contact a Superlite Representative for the current availability of product at 602-352-3500 or 800-366-7877. 2 SUPERLITE ® BLOCK An Oldcastle® Company FIRE RESISTANCE Concrete block wall systems are unsurpassed in functioning Loose fill Insulation as a barrier to contain the spread of fire. These systems The fire resistive time period for concrete masonry units effectively resist transmission of intense heat through the meeting the equivalent thickness required for a two-hour- wall while also preventing the passage of flames and hot fire-resistive rating in Item 3 (below) and having a thickness gases.
    [Show full text]
  • ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL TECHNICAL PAPER Influence Of
    ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL TECHNICAL PAPER Title no. 106-M36 Influence of Aggregate Type and Size on Ductility and Mechanical Properties of Engineered Cementitious Composites by Mustafa Şahmaran, Mohamed Lachemi, Khandaker M. A. Hossain, Ravi Ranade, and Victor C. Li This paper presents the results of an investigation on the influence than normal concrete (Fig. 1). Even at large imposed of aggregate type and size on the mechanical and ductility properties deformation, crack widths of ECC remain small, less than of engineered cementitious composites (ECC). ECC is a 60 μm (0.004 in.) (Fig. 1). With intrinsically tight crack micromechanically-based designed high-performance fiber- width and high tensile ductility, ECC represents a new reinforced cementitious composite with high ductility and improved durability due to tight crack width. Standard ECC generation of high-performance concrete material that offers mixtures are typically produced with microsilica sand (200 µm significant potential to naturally resolving the durability 4-9 [0.008 in.] maximum aggregate size). In this study, ECC mixtures problem of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. containing either crushed dolomitic limestone sand or gravel sand Aggregates typically occupy an important volume fraction with maximum sizes of 1.19 or 2.38 mm (0.047 or 0.094 in.) were in cement-based materials, and thus have important effects investigated. For each aggregate type and maximum aggregate on different aspects of material properties. In addition to size, three different ECC mixtures with fly ash/portland cement (FA/C) ratios of 1.2, 2.2, and 4.2 were cast. Specifically, the effects their role as economical filler, aggregates help control the of maximum aggregate size, aggregate type, and FA/C on the dimensional stability of cement-based materials, which may uniaxial tensile, flexure, and compressive properties, as well as be considered to consist of a framework of cement paste with crack development and drying shrinkage behavior, were experimentally relatively large shrinkage movements restrained by the determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Recycled Crushed Light Expanded Clay Aggregate on High Strength Lightweight Concrete
    https://doi.org/10.33263/Materials23.311317 ISSN: 2668-5728 https://materials.international Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 0311-0317 2020 Received: 25.05.2020 Accepted: 11.06.2020 Article Published: 15.06.2020 Effects of Recycled Crushed Light Expanded Clay Aggregate on High Strength Lightweight Concrete Ming Kun Yew 1,*, Ming Chian Yew 1, Jing Han Beh 1 1 Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering & Science, UTAR, Cheras 43000 Kajang, Malaysia * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]; Scopus ID: 36770106800 Abstract: Many researchers are carrying out environmentally-friendly action in the construction field, such as using recycled aggregate for sustainable development. Disposal of light expanded clay aggregate (LECA) waste into the land causes a severe impact on the environment. LECA is one of the construction materials that are broadly used for various applications. LECA has some excellent properties in its due to technical features, eco-friendly and entirely natural product with a low cost, lightweight, hardness and highly resistant to biological, chemical, and physical degradation forces. Recently, lightweight structural concrete by incorporating lightweight aggregate (LWA) is used to compensate heavy loads by reducing the overall self-weight of structure and minimize the size of the foundation simultaneously. In this study, partially replacement of high content light expanded clay aggregate (LECA) (50, 60, 70, 80, and 90%) have been used to achieve the mechanical properties of high strength LWA concrete. In this study, crushed LECA has been used to achieve compressive strength between 20 to 40 MPa with a density ranged between 1700 to 2000 kg/m3.
    [Show full text]
  • COARSE AGGREGATE for COMPOSITE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (Tollway)
    COARSE AGGREGATE FOR COMPOSITE PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (Tollway) Effective: January 30, 2012 Revised: October 29, 2012November 26, 2012 Coarse aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete shall be in accordance with Section 1004 of the Standard Specifications except as modified below for the lower layer of composite Portland cement concrete pavement. Add the following to Article 1004.02 of the Standard Specifications: “(g) Recycled Coarse Aggregate (RCA). If recycled coarse aggregate is specified for use in a concrete mix design, the recycled coarse aggregate will be generated from a Tollway approved source of existing concrete or asphalt pavement. The recycled coarse aggregate may be processed from a non-AGCS certified location. The processing of recycled coarse aggregates for reuse in hydraulic cement concrete shall be as follows: (1) Concrete pavement or structural concrete for recycled coarse aggregate from an approved source shall be broken with a guillotine (or similar) crusher, removed, and transported to a crushing location at a central recycling plant and be processed in accordance with IDOT’s policy memo for Recycling Portland Cement concrete into Aggregate except as follows. a. Removed concrete shall be crushed with an impact type crusher operating at less than full capacity to minimize the production of fines. Up to 5 percent of the recycled coarse aggregate from Portland cement concrete pavement sources may consist of asphalt containing particles. b. Washing of the crushed concrete coarse aggregate is required. The extra absorptivity of the recycled concrete aggregates shall be accommodated by keeping the stockpiled aggregates wet and at the batching plant by controlling the appropriate amount of water to the concrete mix to achieve the desired water to cement ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Waste Plastic Aggregation in Concrete As a Constituent Material MB Hossain, P Bhowmik, KM Shaad
    Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 383-391, 2016 ISSN: 1017 - 8139 Use of waste plastic aggregation in concrete as a constituent material MB Hossain, P Bhowmik, KM Shaad Department of Farm Structure & Environmental Engineering, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh Abstract The amount of Plastics consumed annually has been growing increasingly in Bangladesh. Consequently, waste plastic recycling has become one of the major challenges in recent times. The present study has selected waste PET, a polymer compound of Polyethylene Terephthalate, to investigate its possible use as plastic aggregate in concrete application. The shredded waste plastic was used in concrete with partial replacement of 5%, 10% and 20% by volume of conventional coarse aggregate. Four types of concrete specimens including one without plastic aggregate, for comparison purpose, were prepared. All the concrete specimens were tested for its different mechanical properties after a curing period of 7, 21 and 28 days. Various physical properties of all aggregates and fresh concrete properties were also tested in the laboratory. The specific gravity of waste plastic aggregate was found 1.4 and the maximum density of concrete containing plastic aggregate was 115 lb/ft3. The density of concrete specimens containing plastic aggregate decreased with the addition of more amount of plastic aggregate. It was found that the concrete specimen containing waste PET at 10% volume showed higher compressive strength and higher modulus of elasticity than other specimens. The splitting tensile strength was about 8-11% of compressive strength. The flexural strength of concrete specimens containing plastic aggregate was lower than that of concrete without plastic aggregate.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Masonry
    DIVISION 04 – MASONRY SECTION 04 20 00 – UNIT MASONRY SECTION 04 20 00 – UNIT MASONRY PART 1 – GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. This Section includes unit masonry assemblies consisting of the following: 1. Concrete masonry units (CMUs). 2. Decorative concrete masonry units. 3. Concrete brick. 4. Mortar and grout. 5. Reinforcing steel. 6. Masonry joint reinforcement. 7. CMU Cell Flashing Pans. 8. Miscellaneous masonry accessories. 9. Masonry-cell insulation. B. Products installed, but not furnished, under this Section include the following: 1. Steel lintels and shelf angles for unit masonry, furnished under Division 05 Section 05 50 00 Metal Fabrications. 1.02 DEFINITIONS A. Reinforced Masonry: Masonry containing reinforcing steel in grouted cells. 1.03 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Provide structural unit masonry that develops indicated net-area compressive strengths (f'm) at 28 days. B. Determine net-area compressive strength (f'm) of masonry from average net-area compressive strengths of masonry units and mortar types (unit-strength method) according to Tables 1 and 2 in ACI 530.1/ASCE 6/TMS 602. Herbert, Rowland & Grubic, Inc. 04 20 00-1 000208.0489 DIVISION 04 – MASONRY SECTION 04 20 00 – UNIT MASONRY 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: For each type of product indicated. B. Shop Drawings: For the following: 1. Reinforcing Steel: Detail bending and placement of unit masonry reinforcing bars. Comply with ACI 315, "Details and Detailing of Concrete Reinforcement.” Show elevations of reinforced walls. C. Samples for Verification: For each type and color of the following: 1. Exposed concrete masonry units. 2. Pigmented and colored-aggregate mortar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manufacture and Uses of Expanded Clay Aggregate
    The manufacture and uses of expanded clay aggregate Thursday 15 November 2012 SCI HQ, London Xavier Kestemont, Argex 1 ARGEX expanded clay Manufacture - Location in BE Kruibeke sourcing LWA’s properties & Normative references Typical end uses Concrete LAC/LWAC SCC Argex 1965…. 2 ARGEX expanded clay Manufacture - Source material – EN13055 sourcing LWA’s properties & “lightweight aggregates Normative references Typical end uses manufactured from Concrete LAC/LWAC natural source materials” SCC Specific LWA material = Expanded clay Argex = Argile expansée Argex is made from clay, which is expanded at high temperature to create individual granules, each of which has a hard ceramic shell that surrounds a perfect honeycomb core 3 Clay pit.. factory 4 ARGEX expanded clay Production process Manufacture - sourcing LWA’s properties & Normative references Typical end uses Extraction & Concrete LAC/LWAC clay preparation SCC 10001000 tonstons clayclay // dayday 5 ARGEX expanded clay Manufacture - Expansion – rotary kiln sourcing LWA’s properties & Normative references Typical end uses Concrete LAC/LWAC SCC 7575 mm –– 55 mm ǾǾ–– 11001100 °°CC 6 ARGEX expanded clay Manufacture - Sieving & storage (silo & sourcing outside) LWA’s properties & Normative references Typical end uses Concrete LAC/LWAC SCC 450.000450.000 mm³³ // yearyear 7 ARGEX expanded clay Aggregates / CE Manufacture - sourcing SIZE LOOSE BULK PARTICLE LWA’s properties & Types (d/D - mm) DENSITY DENSITY (ρrd) Normative references (kg/m³) (kg/m³) Typical end uses Normal Rounded AR 0/2-800
    [Show full text]