The Case of Palestine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Case of Palestine Background documents Exploring strategies for transnational litigation: the case of Palestine Round Table 14 – 15 December 2015 Public Debate 14 December 2015 Palestinians and the Israeli Court System: Litigating Violations of International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law before Israeli Courts. The Nuhanovic Foundation 2 Introduction to Reader TABLE of CONTENTS Foreword p. 4 Introduction p. 5 Documents p. 11 1. Yesh Din; Exceptions: Prosecution of IDF soldiers during and after the second Intifada, 2008. Excerpt: The selected sections give an idea of the types of violations committed against Palestinian civilians and some statistics on the numbers and results of investigations carried out. 2. Yossi Wolfson (for HaMoked) The Right to Compensation for the Violation of Human Rights, 2008. The author considers the fundamental nature of the right to compensation for HR and IHL violations and the obstructions to obtaining compensation for those in the occupied Palestinian territories. 3. R.Goldstone; Report of the UN Fact-finding mission on the Gaza Conflict [of Dec 2008-Jan 2009], Sept. 2009, Excerpt: Part IV (pp 383-404). Part Four of the “Goldstone Report” reviews accountability mechanisms in Israel and Palestine and considers the potential of using universal jurisdiction to address the violations in question. 4. M.Sfard; The Price of internal legal opposition to HR abuses, in Journal of Human Rights Practice Vol.1 (1) 2009, pp 37-50. The author analyses 35 years of human rights related litigation in Israel and considers whether litigating in the courts of the occupier in fact helps to sustain and legitimize the occupation. 5. Public (“Turkel”) Commission report on Israel’s Mechanisms for Examining and Investigating Complaints and Violations of the Laws of Armed Conflict According to International Law, 2013. Excerpt: the reader presents the Commission’s own summary of its 18 recommendations to the Israeli government, including significant changes to both legislation and procedure and increased separation of military/judicial and executive powers (independence of the Military Attorney General). 6. University of Birzeit; Conference report: Law and Politics: Options and Strategies of International Law for the Palestinian People, July 2013 7. R.Falk; Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, 2014. Excerpt: the excerpt presents the author’s conclusions on Israel’s denial of Palestinians’ right of self-determination, by practices and policies which may constitute apartheid and segregation. His 8 recommendations are addressed to the State of Israel and to third States. 8. Israel State Comptroller’s Inquiry 2015. This press release confirms that the State Comptroller and Ombudsman’s office is currently conducting an inquiry into the decision-making and investigation procedures of the military and political echelons during “Operation Protective Edge” – the war in Gaza in the summer of 2014. The inquiry is in part a response to the recommendations of the Türkel Commission report (No.5 in this reader). 9. Yesh Din; The Ciechanover Report – Dodging the Criminalization of War Crimes and Practical Steps towards Implementation - position paper, October 2015. The Ciechanover Commission was appointed to review and implement the recommendations of the Türkel commission (No.5 in the 3 Introduction to Reader reader). The authors criticize the Commission for failing to stipulate the concrete practical steps needed to impel the implementation of the Türkel commissions recommendations 10. Yesh Din; Data sheet: Prosecution of Israeli Civilians Suspected of Harming Palestinians in the West Bank, May 2015. Up to date statistics on investigations into and prosecutions of Israeli civilians suspected of harming Palestinians in the occupied territories 11. Yesh Din, Data sheet: Law Enforcement on IDF soldiers suspected of harming Palestinians – Figures for 2014, Dec. 2015 Legislation 12. International Criminal Court, Office of the Prosecutor; Report on Preliminary Examination Activities for 2015, Excerpt: The section on Palestine includes the procedural history of Palestine’s accession to the ICC on 2 Jan.2015, leading to the opening of a preliminary examination by the Prosecutor’s Office, a very brief sketch of events in Palestine since June 2014 and an account of how the Office of the Prosecutor has been conducting the examination so far. 13. Israeli (Torts) State Liability Law (1952) with Amendment 7 (2005). This is the Law regulating the extent of Israel’s liability to pay compensation to persons injured by actions of the Israeli security forces. The operative article for the purposes of this public debate and reader is Article 5c which has here been amended to broaden the scope of exclusions. 14. Al Mezan; No Reparations in Israel for Palestinians: How Israel’s Amendment No.8 Leaves No Room for Recourse, July 2015. This Comment explains the effect of Amendment No. 8 (2012) of the Israeli (Torts) State Liability Law (No.12 in the reader). The Amendment widens - once again - the category of situations which preclude the possibility of compensation claims being brought against the State of Israel. 4 Introduction to Reader Foreword This reader presents a selection of documents, from among the many publicly available, on the legal situation of Palestinians living under Israeli occupation. The Introduction explains the background to the uniquely obscure legal context within which Palestinians must operate in their pursuit of legal redress for harm suffered, whether in the context of armed conflict or due to administrative measures imposed by Israel in the occupied West Bank, or to conditions imposed by the blockade of Gaza, ongoing since 2007. The reports and articles focus on legal and practical obstacles to access to justice - an indispensable element of the right to reparations for civilians who suffer violations of human rights. They cover a period (2008 – 2015) in which the investigative procedures and practic- es of Israel’s military advocate general and military court system have repeatedly come under criti- cal scrutiny from national and international observers. Israel has responded by instigating a public commission of inquiry (the ‘Turkel Commission’) and several follow up reports on the implementation of that Commission’s recommendations. In the light of the recent accession of Palestine to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Israel’s willingness and ability to conduct investigations and prosecutions into alleged international crimes may become the subject of detailed examination. Included also is the report of a conference held at Birzeit University in 2013, in which legal experts proposed rethinking the situation of the Palestinians using other legal paradigms than that of oc- cupation. Among others, the law pertaining to apartheid and the right to self-determination were considered. 5 Introduction to Reader INTRODUCTION Palestinians residing in the West Bank live in a situation of prolonged occupation that is virtually unique in the world today. While Israel’s occupation of Gaza officially ended in 2005, the residents of Gaza have lived under a land and sea blockade involving Israeli control of all border crossings by peo- ple and goods since 2007. Legal options open to Palestinians living in both areas are heavily circum- scribed by the nature of the military occupation and the physical obstacles to free movement within the West Bank and between Israel and the Palestinian territories. Political relationship and borders The dissimilar histories of the two peoples who share Israel and Palestine today and the highly spe- cific circumstances in which the Jewish State of Israel emerged from the ruins of WWII are among many factors that have contributed to a profoundly asymmetrical political relationship between them. The two-State solution, envisaged at various points from 1937 on, and much-favored by the United Nations since the 1970’s, has never eventuated and the borders between Israel and the split territories nominally under Palestinian control remain disputed. The boundary line known as the ‘green line’ marked a non-permanent demarcation agreed upon following the Arab-Israeli war of 1948. In the 1967 ‘six-day war’ Israel extended its control beyond the green line (as well as into the East Jerusalem - then under Jordanian rule - the Gaza strip, the Sinai desert (Egypt) and the Golan heights (Syria)).1 Citing the temporary status of the ‘green line’ Israel disputes today that it ‘occupies’ the West Bank, or indeed that it has effectively annexed East Jerusalem: it observes that these areas were not with- in the possession of any other sovereign State immediately prior to Israel’s westward and eastward expansion, and therefore cannot be under ‘occupation’. While the UN among other international ob- servers emphatically consider Israel to be in occupation of the West Bank, the legally undetermined status of the border has allowed Israel to make many unilateral moves to exercise control of various kinds in the territory, which it justifies mostly with reference to the need to protect its citizens from hostile attack from Palestinian territories. The Israeli government refers to the occupied West Bank as the districts of Judea and Samaria. Meanwhile on the ground – literally - there is by now the incontrovertible border created by the con- crete separation wall, begun in 2000 and presently extending some 500 kms. The barrier approxi- mately follows the green line but extends at many locations well into the Palestinian side of that line. Other less visible borders within the occupied West Bank have been created by the division of the territory under the Oslo II Accord of 1995 – Annex I. Under this agreement Israeli exercises varying degrees of administrative, legal and security control over large areas of the West Bank.2 To its west, Israel has blockaded the Gaza Strip since 2007 following the election of Hamas to political leader- ship of the area. A series of wars, the most recent in August 2014, has both reflected and maintained constant high levels of tension between the two populations and repeatedly reduced large parts of Gaza to rubble.
Recommended publications
  • Operation Protective Edge a War Waged on Gaza's
    OPERATION PROTECTIVE EDGE A WAR WAGED ON GAZA’s CHILDREN www.dci-palestine.org Copyright © 2015 Defense for Children International Palestine All rights reserved. Cover photo: A Palestinian girl sits in front of a wall riddled with shrapnel, in Beit Hanoun, North Gaza on November 17, 2014, which came under heavy attacks during Operation Protective Edge. Photo credit: Anne Paq, Activestills.org Acknowledgements Producing this report would not have been possible without the invaluable work of a number of individuals. Defense for Children International Palestine’s monitoring and documentation team of field researchers, coordinators, and office staff have worked meticulously in very difficult and dangerous circumstances, often exposing themselves to very real threats to their personal security in order to retrieve, verify and prepare the information documented in this report. For their efforts, DCIP expresses its deepest appreciation. DCIP would like to extend particular gratitude and admiration to the victims, victims’ families and eyewitnesses who willingly shared with us the testimonies of the deeply traumatic and tragic events they went through during Operation Protective Edge. Mona Patel, reporting officer, Olivia Watson, advocacy officer, and Brad Parker, international advocacy officer, researched and wrote the report based on investigations conducted by DCIP’s monitoring and documentation unit and Gaza- based field team. It was reviewed and edited by Ayed Abu Eqtaish, accountability program director, and Ivan Karakashian, advocacy unit coordinator. Defense for Children International Palestine is an independent, local Palestinian child rights organization based in Ramallah dedicated to defending and promoting the rights of children living in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Military
    Israel’s Military: Emotions, Violence, and the Limits of Dissent Submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirement of the degree of Ph.D. Sorana-Cristina Jude Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University Wales September 2017 Word Count Thesis: 76, 351 Declaration This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree. Candidate name: Sorana-Cristina Jude Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 STATEMENT 1 This thesis is the result of my own investigations, except where otherwise stated. Where *correction services have been used, the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in a footnote(s). Other sources are acknowledged by footnotes giving explicit references. A bibliography is appended. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 [*this refers to the extent to which the text has been corrected by others] STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter- library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date I hereby give consent for my thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan after the expiry of the bar on access, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signature Date 15. 12. 2017 Summary The thesis contributes to the feminist and critical engagements with the Israeli military and its violent behaviour against Palestinian civilians. Intrigued by the public, military, and political reluctance to condemn the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for their individual and collective violence against Palestinians, this research presents the artificial and multifaceted construction of a professional, non-threatening, and humanitarian military subjectivity as a material and symbolic figure that constrains local and international dissent against the Israeli military.
    [Show full text]
  • CTC Sentinel 7:2 (2014)
    NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 . VOL 7 . ISSUE 11 Contents A Daunting Triangle: Turkey, the Kurds, and the ISIL Threat By Buddhika ‘Jay’ Jayamaha FEATURE ARTICLE 1 A Daunting Triangle: Turkey, the Kurds, and the ISIL Threat By Buddhika ‘Jay’ Jayamaha REPORTS 5 The Battle for Kobani Comes to the Fore By Derek Henry Flood 9 Hizb Allah’s Lebanese Resistance Brigades By Chris Zambelis 12 Libya’s South: The Forgotten Frontier By Geoffrey Howard 16 The “Seventh Stage” of Terrorism in China By Sajjan M. Gohel 20 A Classical Analysis of the 2014 Israel- Hamas Conflict By Elad Popovich CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts he rise of the Islamic State in nature of the situation, there are reasons Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has to be hopeful. created an area where Turkish and Kurdish interests overlap: This article contextualizes what some Tboth parties are thoroughly alarmed at observers refer to as the “Byzantine” ISIL’s expansion. However, delicate and nature of changing Turkish-Kurdish sensitive cooperation against ISIL has relations in the fight against ISIL. For to take place in the broader context of example, the fact that Turkey gave About the CTC Sentinel the complicated and evolving Kurdish- permission to Iraqi peshmerga troops The Combating Terrorism Center is an Turkish relationship. While Turkey to cross into Syria by way of Turkey, as independent educational and research develops its response to the ISIL threat saviors of Syrian Kurds, and that Turkey institution based in the Department of Social and the Syrian crisis, it is also managing is now training Kurdish peshmerga forces Sciences at the United States Military Academy, Kurdish relations as part of its effort to against ISIL,1 came as a surprise even West Point.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Gaza War: the War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted
    The Gaza War 2014: The War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted Hirsh Goodman and Dore Gold, eds. with Lenny Ben-David, Alan Baker, David Benjamin, Jonathan D. Halevi, and Daniel Rubenstein Front Cover Photo: Hamas fires rockets from densely populated Gaza City into Israel on July 15, 2014. The power plant in the Israeli city of Ashkelon is visible in the background. (AFP/Thomas Coex) Back Cover Photo: Hamas terrorists deploy inside a tunnel under the Gaza City neighborhood of Shuja’iya on Aug. 17, 2014. (Anadolu Images/Mustafa Hassona) © 2015 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org Graphic Design: Darren Goldstein ISBN: 978-965-218-125-1 Contents Executive Summary 4 Preface 5 Israel’s Narrative – An Overview 7 Hirsh Goodman Telling the Truth about the 2014 Gaza War 31 Ambassador Dore Gold Israel, Gaza and Humanitarian Law: Efforts to Limit Civilian Casualties 45 Lt. Col. (res.) David Benjamin The Legal War: Hamas’ Crimes against Humanity and Israel’s Right to Self-Defense 61 Ambassador Alan Baker The Limits of the Diplomatic Arena 77 Ambassador Dore Gold Hamas’ Strategy Revealed 89 Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi Hamas’ Order of Battle: Weapons, Training, and Targets 109 Lenny Ben-David Hamas’ Tunnel Network: A Massacre in the Making 119 Daniel Rubenstein Hamas’ Silent Partners 131 Lenny Ben-David Gazan Casualties: How Many and Who They Were 141 Lenny Ben-David Key Moments in a 50-Day War: A Timeline 153 Daniel Rubenstein About the Authors 167 About the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 168 3 Executive Summary The Gaza War 2014: The War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted is a researched and documented narrative that relates the truth as it happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Targeting: a Legal Appraisal John J
    Naval War College Review Volume 68 Article 4 Number 4 Autumn 2015 Israeli Targeting: A Legal Appraisal John J. Merriam U.S. Army Michael N. Schmitt Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Merriam, John J. and Schmitt, Michael N. (2015) "Israeli Targeting: A Legal Appraisal," Naval War College Review: Vol. 68 : No. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol68/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Merriam and Schmitt: Israeli Targeting: A Legal Appraisal ISRAELI TARGETING A Legal Appraisal Major John J. Merriam, U.S. Army, and Michael N. Schmitt he Israeli-Palestinian conflict is seemingly intractable� It involves conten- tious issues, such as extended occupation, the status of Jerusalem, a claimed T“right of return” for Palestinian refugees, and recognition of a Palestinian state� Episodic hostilities have punctuated the conflict, causing heavy civilian casualties on both sides� The tactics employed have proved highly controversial, with some, such as terrorism and the direct targeting of the Israeli population, self-evidently qualifying as war crimes� Between June and August 2014, Israel engaged in yet another round of intense hostilities with Palestinian organized
    [Show full text]
  • From Cast Lead to Protective Edge: Lessons from Israel's Wars in Gaza
    From Cast Lead to Protective Edge Lessons from Israel’s Wars in Gaza Raphael S. Cohen, David E. Johnson, David E. Thaler, Brenna Allen, Elizabeth M. Bartels, James Cahill, Shira Efron C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1888 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9787-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise): Nir Elias/Reuters; Amir Cohen/Reuters; Abu Mustafa/Reuters; Tsafrir Abayov/AP Photo Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report examines the Israel Defense Forces operations in Gaza from the end of Operation Cast Lead in 2009 through Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012 to Operation Protective Edge in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Murders IDF Soldier to Prevent His Capture
    Israel Murders IDF Soldier to Prevent His Capture By Richard Silverstein Region: Middle East & North Africa Global Research, July 27, 2014 In-depth Report: PALESTINE Tikun Olam 26 July 2014 Sgt. Guy Levy of the armored corps, killed July 26, 2014 by the IDF to prevent his capture I’ve devoted a good deal of my life to Israel. I’ve studied, read, visited, lived, breathed it. Not in the way diehard pro-Israel fanatics do. But in a different way that matched my own intellectual and political proclivities. It’s a subject that is rich, varied, troubling, bedeviling, and exhilarating. But every once in a while I learn something I never thought possible; and I don’t mean this in a good way. Tonight, my Israeli source informed me that Sgt. Guy Levy, serving in the armored corps, was captured by Hamas fighters. He had been part of a joint engineering-armored-combat unit searching for tunnels. Troops entered a structure and discovered a tunnel. Suddenly, out of the shaft sprang two militants who dragged one of the soldiers into it. By return fire, one of the Palestinians was killed, while the other fled, presumably with the soldier. This Israeli report, which was censored by the IDF, says only that the attempt to capture the soldier failed. It says nothing about his fate. The expectation of anyone reading it would be that the soldier was freed. But he was not. In order to prevent the success of the operation, the IDF killed him. Nana reports that the IDF fired a tank shell into the building, which is the same way another captured soldier was killed by the IDF during Cast Lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 Human Rights Report
    ISRAEL 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Israel is a multiparty parliamentary democracy. Although it has no constitution, parliament, the unicameral 120-member Knesset, has enacted a series of “Basic Laws” that enumerate fundamental rights. Certain fundamental laws, orders, and regulations legally depend on the existence of a “state of emergency,” which has been in effect since 1948. Under the Basic Laws, the Knesset has the power to dissolve the government and mandate elections. Following the nationwide Knesset elections in April and September, which were generally considered free and fair, Israeli political parties failed to form a coalition government. Therefore, the Knesset voted on December 11 to dissolve itself and set March 2, 2020, as the date for a third general election within a year. Under the authority of the prime minister, the Israeli Security Agency (ISA) combats terrorism and espionage in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza. The national police, including the border police and the immigration police, are under the authority of the Ministry of Public Security. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) is responsible for external security but also has some domestic security responsibilities and reports to the Ministry of Defense. ISA forces operating in the West Bank and East Jerusalem fall under the IDF for operations and operational debriefing. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security services. Significant human rights issues included: reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings, including targeted killings of Israeli civilians and soldiers; arbitrary detention; restrictions on non-Israelis residing in Jerusalem including arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy, family, and home; and significant restrictions on freedom of movement.
    [Show full text]
  • War Against the People, Halper
    War Against the People This content downloaded from 198.91.37.2 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:41:13 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Halper WATP 00 pre 1 08/07/2015 07:15 “Fascinating . Halper places the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories at the heart of what he calls the pacification industry. A brave, analytical and innovative book.” —Andrew Feinstein author The Shadow World: Inside the Global Arms Trade “A brilliant book by one of the world’s most inspiring political activists. It lays out the way in which Israel’s war on the Palestinians has become both a model and the laboratory for a global war against the people.” —Eyal Weizman, author of Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation “Halper’s disturbing vision is a rare combination of theoretical imagination and political passion.” —Derek Gregory, Peter Wall Distinguished Professor, Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies and Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, and author of The Colonial Present “An excellent, revealing and accessible examination of Israel’s ‘security politics’ and the changing nature of pacification worldwide.” —Mouin Rabbani, Senior Fellow with the Institute for Palestine Studies and Co-editor of Jadaliyya “This book has opened my eyes. A fascinating read.” —Shir Hever, author of The Political Economy of Israel’s Occupation This content downloaded from 198.91.37.2 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:41:13 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Halper WATP 00 pre 2 08/07/2015 07:15 War Against the People Israel, the Palestinians and Global Pacification Jeff Halper This content downloaded from 198.91.37.2 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016 01:41:13 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms Halper WATP 00 pre 3 08/07/2015 07:15 First published 2015 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA www.plutobooks.com Copyright © Jeff Halper 2015 The right of Jeff Halper to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Hadar Goldin Killed by the IDF on Purpose? What Is the Hannibal Directive and Is It Ethical?
    Was Hadar Goldin Killed by the IDF on Purpose? What is the Hannibal Directive and is it Ethical? Hannibal Directive: Ethical Mandate or Myth Altogether? – Rabbi Efrem Goldberg Rabbi Efrem Goldberg Boca Raton Synagogue Boca Raton Synagogue - Page #1 Israeli army employed 'Hannibal Protocol' to prevent officer's a... http://www.i24news.tv/en/news/israel/diplomacy-defense/3912... PUBLISHED I24NEWS August 04th 2014 04:16pm Israeli arm y em ployed 'Hannibal Prot ocol' t o prevent offi cer 's abduct ion Military inquiry concludes First Lt.Hadar Goldin likely died in ambush near tunnel entrance The death of First Lieutenant Hadar Goldin on Friday was a key moment in Israel's Gaza operation. Three weeks into the fighting and 75 minutes after what was supposed to be a three-day ceasefire brokered by the US and UN took hold, a gun battle between Israeli troops and Hamas militants near an entrance to a tunnel in the Southern city of Rafah shattered the calm. The shootout, and the subsequent discovery that squad commander Goldin was missing, drove commanders in the field to issue the order to enact the "Hannibal Protocol," a directive that calls for the massive use of force in an effort to rescue a captured soldier, even at risk to the soldier's life. An IDF inquiry into the incident has concluded that Goldin was likely killed in the original gun battle, alongside his company commander Maj. Benaya Sarel and communications officer, Staff Sgt. Liel Gidoni. But immediately after the fire exchange, when no trace of him could be found, forces on the ground had to assume that he had been dragged by the militants into the network of tunnels dug under Gaza and thus they issued the order, unleashing massive firepower by tanks, artillery and fighter jets onto the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey, the Kurds, and the ISIL Threat
    NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2014 . VOL 7 . ISSUE 11 Contents A Daunting Triangle: Turkey, the Kurds, and the ISIL Threat By Buddhika ‘Jay’ Jayamaha FEATURE ARTICLE 1 A Daunting Triangle: Turkey, the Kurds, and the ISIL Threat By Buddhika ‘Jay’ Jayamaha REPORTS 5 The Battle for Kobani Comes to the Fore By Derek Henry Flood 9 Hizb Allah’s Lebanese Resistance Brigades By Chris Zambelis 12 Libya’s South: The Forgotten Frontier By Geoffrey Howard 16 The “Seventh Stage” of Terrorism in China By Sajjan M. Gohel 20 A Classical Analysis of the 2014 Israel- Hamas Conflict By Elad Popovich CTC Sentinel Staff & Contacts he rise of the Islamic State in nature of the situation, there are reasons Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) has to be hopeful. created an area where Turkish and Kurdish interests overlap: This article contextualizes what some Tboth parties are thoroughly alarmed at observers refer to as the “Byzantine” ISIL’s expansion. However, delicate and nature of changing Turkish-Kurdish sensitive cooperation against ISIL has relations in the fight against ISIL. For to take place in the broader context of example, the fact that Turkey gave About the CTC Sentinel the complicated and evolving Kurdish- permission to Iraqi peshmerga troops The Combating Terrorism Center is an Turkish relationship. While Turkey to cross into Syria by way of Turkey, as independent educational and research develops its response to the ISIL threat saviors of Syrian Kurds, and that Turkey institution based in the Department of Social and the Syrian crisis, it is also managing is now training Kurdish peshmerga forces Sciences at the United States Military Academy, Kurdish relations as part of its effort to against ISIL,1 came as a surprise even West Point.
    [Show full text]
  • 20150622 -- OHCHR Report on Palestine [A HRC CRP 4].Pdf
    Report of the detailed findings of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution S-21/1 Summary The present document contains the detailed finding of the independent commission of inquiry established pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution S-21/1. The commission’s principal findings and recommendations are provided in document A/HRC/29/52. Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1-5 3 II. Mandate and methodology...................................................................................... 6-21 3 A. Assessment of information and standard of proof.......................................... 14-21 5 III. Legal framework ..................................................................................................... 22-52 7 A. International humanitarian law ....................................................................... 23-37 7 B. International human rights law ....................................................................... 38-46 12 C. International criminal law............................................................................... 47-52 15 IV. Context ................................................................................................................ 53-58 17 V. Principal findings and conclusions.......................................................................... 59-550 18 A. The Gaza Strip and Israel...............................................................................
    [Show full text]