DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Applications Committee 03 December 2019 Second Addendum: Amendments and Additional Information on Agenda Items

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Applications Committee 03 December 2019 Second Addendum: Amendments and Additional Information on Agenda Items PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 03 DECEMBER 2019 SECOND ADDENDUM: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGENDA ITEMS Page Number Report Changes Decision Letter Changes ITEM 4 Applications 19/01304/FUL & 19/01305/LB – 8 Albert Embankment Pages 167, and Amendments to report No 168 ‘Affordable Housing and An addendum note has been provided by BNPP in relation to viability. Housing Mix’ Officer comment: BNPP can comment on this should committee members have any questions. Page 221 No ‘Planning The contribution for implementation of Low Traffic Neighbourhood on local streets in the area is Obligations and £164,000. CIL’ Page 228, Additional Condition (amended to suggested additional condition set out in First Addendum) Yes Conditions Noise Mitigation and Control for Noise Generating Uses 43 Prior to the commencement of development of each relevant block containing an A4 or D2 use hereby permitted, a scheme of noise assessment and scheme of mitigation must be undertaken and shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority to ensure that the noise impacts from all/the relevant A4 and D2 uses shall be suitably mitigated and that the spaces shall be suitably ventilated to enable effective delivery of the proposed scheme. A suitably qualified independent person must undertake all work and the scheme of mitigation. The scheme shall ensure that operational noise levels from the commercial use do not exceed NR25 Leq,5mins between 22:00 – 07:00hrs within potentially adversely affected residential or other noise sensitive locations during typical activities. The scheme must include details of stages of validation during the construction phase and a post construction scheme of validation and measurement to demonstrate substantive compliance. Details of the post construction validation shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 03 DECEMBER 2019 SECOND ADDENDUM: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGENDA ITEMS Reason: To protect the amenities of adjoining occupiers and the surrounding area (policy Q2 of the London Borough of Lambeth Local Plan (2015)). Office comment: The reason for the requested amendment is that the A4/D2 uses will come forward as part of different phases and will not come forward together. The fire station will also be delivered as the first phase and as worded its occupation could be delayed – phased provision will address this concern. The suggested noise limit condition also has no indication of the measurement parameter used or the period it should be applied and therefore has been amended to reflect timescales. Pages 146 to 157 Additional Consultation Responses No ‘Consultation Responses' Primrose Hill Conservation Area Advisory Committee – objection for the following reasons: The application would significantly harm the protected views designated in the LVMF view (4A) from Primrose Hill which includes the setting of the Victoria Tower of the Palace of Westminster. The Primrose Hill Conservation Area Advisory Committee has welcomed the GLA’s enhanced recognition of the importance of a range of London views in the draft London Plan, and we contributed to the Planning Inspectors’ examination in public, supporting the protection of such views. It would be a blow to the democratic process to undermine these views, and undermining to communities across London for our treasured sense of place, of our London, to be harmed in the way proposed. Whitgift Estate TRA No Further correspondence has been received attaching a review by the BRE dated 26/11/2019 of the daylight and sunlight report produced by Shroeders Begg. Officer comment: Shroeders Begg have been provided a copy of the review by the BRE and can comment on this should committee members have any questions. PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 03 DECEMBER 2019 SECOND ADDENDUM: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGENDA ITEMS Vauxhall One Business Improvement District (BID) - Supports growth in Vauxhall and works to No ensure that all businesses benefit from the developments in our area. The BID welcomes the kind of innovation and positive change that creates skills, supports jobs and helps build a positive future for Vauxhall, while celebrating the area's important and thoroughly unique past. Our most recent survey showed great support amongst local businesses for improved amenities for the area. These proposals include a number of low-cost rental spaces for new micro, small and medium sized enterprises, which will help to spread the benefits of growth in the local area, as well as provide new amenities for local residents. All these new businesses together will help to generate over £1.7 million a year for the Council through business rates and new and improved public spaces that can be enjoyed by all. Florence Eshalomi AM (London Assembly Member for Lambeth & Southwark) No Letter of objection from Florence Eshalomi AM received attached as Appendix 3 Ward Councillors No Letter of objection received from Cllr Davies attached as Appendix 1 Letter of objection received from Cllr Simpson attached as Appendix 2 Transport for London No The following additional comments have been received: “The only outstanding issue for TfL is the fire station access. We’ve relayed our concerns that the proposals assume the existing access arrangements for fire tender via Lambeth High Street, which will not be achievable for vehicles returning from Lambeth Palace Road once TfL’s scheme for Lambeth Bridge south is implemented. As such the committee report suggests that a planning obligation will be required to agree alternative access, as per the extract below, which is welcomed. The access arrangements for the Fire Station are proposed to remain essentially as existing. It’s proposed that fire appliances exit the site onto Albert Embankment, returning (in forward gear) to the rear via Lambeth High Street. However, TfL’s proposal for Lambeth Bridge South indicate restricted vehicle turning movements from Lambeth Palace Road to Lambeth Road - making this arrangement difficult for vehicles returning from the north of the site. TfL have stated that an PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 03 DECEMBER 2019 SECOND ADDENDUM: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGENDA ITEMS alternative could be to route via Black Prince Road to access Lambeth High Street, avoiding significant re-routing. However, the existing road layout and building line inhibits that manoeuvre for larger vehicles. The applicant is therefore required to enter into a planning obligation to agree an alternative access, to ensure that the two schemes are compatible. It is likely that TfL will also be a party to the appropriate agreement. In line with Local Plan Policy T1 which gives prioritises walking over taxis, we requested that the taxi rank proposed on Lambeth High Street should be removed to provide a wider footway. We opposed the positioning of the taxi rank here because of its effect on the pedestrian environment. Located on the footway, it would have resulted in a substandard footway width behind the rank. The Pedestrian Comfort Level [PCL] on the footway around the potential taxi-rank would fall to PCL=F with a two-taxi rank. On the PCL scale A [best] to F [worst] TfL’s own guidance states anything below C+ is unacceptable for ‘high street’ environments. No suitable alternative location was identified, but there are 2 x alternative taxi ranks within approx. 300m of the site”. Officer comment: Details of alternative access arrangements to be agreed with Tfl covered by s106 head of term as set out on Page 221 of the committee report. With respect to taxi parking, no suitable alternative location was identified, but there are 2 x alternative taxi ranks within approx. 300m of the site. Beaconsfield Gallery – Objection on the following grounds: No Lack of consultation; The proposed building will block the existing view of our historic, neo classical, Victorian building that currently has a sight-line extending from Vauxhall Spring Gardens, coming into view at Walker Books. The proposed U+I tower block will completely erase any view of the original, intact side of our building which is of key historic importance for the area as the philanthropic project of the former Lambeth Ragged School (built 1851); The building of towers in a conservation area and on a site that has been designated not to have tall buildings (in Lambeth's Local Plan 2015) due to the heritage sensitivity of the location; Loss of sun and daylight to all the surrounding communities and businesses and particularly to Beaconsfield Gallery Vauxhall, which requires light for its operation as a free, public art gallery and café; Loss of sun and daylight that would result from the building of a tower on the corner of Black Prince Road and Newport Street: the building will block light to the windows of the Upper Gallery PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 03 DECEMBER 2019 SECOND ADDENDUM: AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON AGENDA ITEMS and Lower gallery/café space. This will severely impact both exhibitions and community use of the café, causing substantial adverse harm to the amenity we provide, the catering business that we support and therefore to the public. Additional Responses No An additional 60 objection responses have been received – these raise no new issues to those already reported in the committee report. Summary of total responses received to date (including those set out in the first and second No addendums) In total, 1,195 local residents were consulted on the applications with 699 individual representations having been received during the consultation period of which 344 were in support and 355 were in objection. Three petitions of objection with 2,177 signatures, 100 signatures and 43 signatures respectively have also been received. Appendix One Dear PAC members, I will be attending PAC to speak about my reservations regarding the 8 Albert Embankment proposed development.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Date: Tuesday 25 May 2021 Time: 7.00 pm Venue: Committee Room (B6) - Lambeth Town Hall, Brixton, London, SW2 1RW* *In line with legislation and continuing Covid-19 precautions, Committee Members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually. Further instructions about joining the meeting, are provided overleaf. Copies of agendas, reports, minutes and other attachments for the Council’s meetings are available on the Lambeth website. www.lambeth.gov.uk/moderngov Members of the Committee Councillor Scarlett O'Hara (Vice-Chair), Councillor Malcolm Clark, Councillor Jessica Leigh, Councillor Mohammed Seedat, Councillor Iain Simpson, Councillor Joanne Simpson (Chair) and Councillor Becca Thackray Substitute Members Councillor Liz Atkins, Councillor Jennifer Brathwaite, Councillor Marcia Cameron, Councillor Rezina Chowdhury, Councillor Paul Gadsby, Councillor Nigel Haselden, Councillor Maria Kay, Councillor Marianna Masters, Councillor Timothy Windle and Councillor Sonia Winifred Further Information If you require any further information or have any queries please contact: Farah Hussain, Telephone: 020 7926 4201; Email: [email protected] Published on: Thursday 13 May 2021 Queries on reports Please contact report authors prior to the meeting if you have questions on the reports or wish to inspect the background documents used. The contact details of the report author are shown on the front page of each report. @LBLdemocracy on Twitter http://twitter.com/LBLdemocracy or use #Lambeth How to access the meeting In line with legislation, Committee members will attend the meeting in person at Lambeth Town Hall. Due to public health guidance covering health, hygiene and social distancing, officers, visiting Ward Members and members of the public are invited to attend virtually.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Diversity in Politics and Public Life
    BRIEFING PAPER CBP 01156, 22 October 2020 By Elise Uberoi and Ethnic diversity in politics Rebecca Lees and public life Contents: 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 2. Parliament 3. The Government and Cabinet 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 5. Public sector organisations www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Ethnic diversity in politics and public life Contents Summary 3 1. Ethnicity in the United Kingdom 6 1.1 Categorising ethnicity 6 1.2 The population of the United Kingdom 7 2. Parliament 8 2.1 The House of Commons 8 Since the 1980s 9 Ethnic minority women in the House of Commons 13 2.2 The House of Lords 14 2.3 International comparisons 16 3. The Government and Cabinet 17 4. Other elected bodies in the UK 19 4.1 Devolved legislatures 19 4.2 Local government and the Greater London Authority 19 5. Public sector organisations 21 5.1 Armed forces 21 5.2 Civil Service 23 5.3 National Health Service 24 5.4 Police 26 5.4 Justice 27 5.5 Prison officers 28 5.6 Teachers 29 5.7 Fire and Rescue Service 30 5.8 Social workers 31 5.9 Ministerial and public appointments 33 Annex 1: Standard ethnic classifications used in the UK 34 Cover page image copyright UK Youth Parliament 2015 by UK Parliament. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / image cropped 3 Commons Library Briefing, 22 October 2020 Summary This report focuses on the proportion of people from ethnic minority backgrounds in a range of public positions across the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 193 Dec 2005/Jan 2006 £1.00
    CAATnews 75% OF ARMS DEALS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED WITHOUT OUR HELP Issue 193 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ Dec 2005/Jan 2006 Tel: 020 7281 0297 Fax: 020 7281 4369 £1.00 Email: [email protected] Website: www.caat.org.uk CAATnews IN THIS ISSUE... Editor Melanie Jarman [email protected] Legal Consultant Glen Reynolds Proofreader Rachel Vaughan Design Richie Andrew Contributors Bristol CAAT, Kathryn Busby, Beccie D’Cunha, Ann Feltham, Nicholas Gilby, Anna Jones, Mike Lewis, James O’Nions, Ian Prichard, South Essex CAAT. Thank you also to our dedicated team of CAATnews stuffers. Printed by Russell Press on 100% recycled paper using only post consumer de-inked waste. Copy deadline for the next issue is 12 January 2006. We shall be posting it the week beginning 26 January 2006. Content of most website references are also available in print – contact CAAT National Gathering – see page 6 PATRICK DELANEY the CAAT office. Contributors to CAATnews express Countdown to DESO 3 their own opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of CAAT as an organisation. Contributors retain Arms Trade Shorts 4–5 copyright of all work used. CAAT was set up in 1974 and is a broad coalition of groups and News and updates 6 individuals working for the reduction and ultimate abolition of the Local campaign news and views 7 international arms trade, together with progressive demilitarisation within arms-producing countries. Cover story: DESO 8–9 Campaign Against Arms Trade 11 Goodwin Street, London N4 3HQ Feature: Arms trade treaty 10 tel: 020 7281 0297 fax: 020 7281 4369 email: [email protected] Reed campaign 11 web: www.caat.org.uk If you use Charities Aid Foundation cheques and would like to help TREAT Parliamentary 12 (Trust for Research and Education on Arms Trade), please send CAF Clean investment campaign 13 cheques, payable to TREAT, to the office.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Harman QC MP
    Harriet Harman QC MP Member of Parliament for Camberwell & Peckham House of Commons London SW1A 0AA 0207 219 4218 [email protected] www.harrietharman.org @HarrietHarman @UKLabour 1 For further information about my work in the constituency please see my website www.harrietharman.org Introduction For the Labour Party in Camberwell and Peckham, the next 12 months will be very different from the last. 2016 has been busy with elections. We had the Mayoral election, then the EU Referendum and then the Labour Leadership election. Next year we will be having no elections and that will give us the opportunity to campaign in every ward to build the support we need to get our councillors re-elected in 2018. It is always important to have a Labour Councillor on your side, but never more so than when there is a Tory government. And with the leadership election behind us it will be the chance for all members, including the over 2,000 who have joined us since 2015, to be out campaigning together. People locally will judge us not just by the discussions we have in our ward and in our GC but by our commitment to be out there campaigning on their doorstep, showing our solidarity with them as they face difficult times. And there is every possibility that, with the Government mired in difficulties over Brexit and with our low standing in the opinion polls, The Prime Minister might seek the opportunity of an early General Election. In the meantime the reality of a Tory government continues to press down on people.
    [Show full text]
  • Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper)
    Report Stage: Monday 5 July 2021 Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) This document lists all amendments tabled to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Any withdrawn amendments are listed at the end of the document. The amendments are arranged in the order in which it is expected they will be decided. NEW CLAUSES, NEW SCHEDULES AND AMENDMENTS RELATING TO PARTS 1 TO 4 AND 10, OTHER THAN ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO OFFENCES CONCERNING PETS OR ANY NEW CLAUSES RELATING TO VOYEURISM Ms Harriet Harman NC1 Caroline Nokes Sir Peter Bottomley Wera Hobhouse Caroline Lucas Liz Saville Roberts Stella Creasy Julie Elliott Taiwo Owatemi Maria Eagle Helen Hayes Dame Diana Johnson Emma Hardy Rosie Cooper Rushanara Ali Tonia Antoniazzi Rosie Duffield Yvonne Fovargue Bell Ribeiro-Addy Barbara Keeley Anne Marie Morris Mohammad Yasin Andrew Gwynne Karin Smyth Paul Blomfield Debbie Abrahams Dame Margaret Hodge Sir Mark Hendrick Kevin Brennan Mr Andrew Mitchell Clive Efford Mr Virendra Sharma Clive Lewis Sarah Champion Claire Hanna Florence Eshalomi Simon Hoare Navendu Mishra Chris Bryant Kim Johnson Catherine McKinnell Geraint Davies Claudia Webbe Paula Barker Darren Jones Mr David Davis Jamie Stone Ed Davey Jackie Doyle-Price Derek Twigg Yvette Cooper Christina Rees Apsana Begum Stephen Farry Ben Lake Jonathan Edwards Jeremy Corbyn To move the following Clause— “Harassment in a public place (1) A person must not engage in any conduct in a public place— (a) which amounts to harassment of another, and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee POLICE, CRIME, SENTENCING AND COURTS BILL First Sitting Tuesday 18 May 2021 (Morning) CONTENTS Programme motion agreed to. Written evidence (Reporting to the House) motion agreed to. Motion to sit in private agreed to. Examination of witnesses. Adjourned till this day at Two o’clock. PBC (Bill 5) 2021 - 2022 No proofs can be supplied. Corrections that Members suggest for the final version of the report should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Saturday 22 May 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1 Public Bill Committee 18 MAY 2021 Police, Crime, Sentencing and 2 Courts Bill The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: SIR CHARLES WALKER, †STEVE MCCABE † Anderson, Lee (Ashfield) (Con) † Higginbotham, Antony (Burnley) (Con) † Atkins, Victoria (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of † Jones, Sarah (Croydon Central) (Lab) State for the Home Department) † Levy, Ian (Blyth Valley) (Con) † Baillie, Siobhan (Stroud) (Con) † Philp, Chris (Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State † Champion, Sarah (Rotherham) (Lab) for the Home Department) † Charalambous, Bambos (Enfield, Southgate) (Lab) † Pursglove, Tom (Corby) (Con) † Clarkson, Chris (Heywood and Middleton) (Con) † Wheeler, Mrs Heather
    [Show full text]
  • The Co-Operative Council
    The Co-operative Council Sharing power: A new settlement between citizens and the state Lambeth’s proposal to become a Co-operative Council has generated a striking amount of passion, interest and debate over the past year. This new approach to public service delivery aims to reshape the settlement between citizens and the state by handing more power to local people so that a real partnership of equals can emerge. I believe the huge level of interest in our ideas both locally and nationally is driven by a genuine desire to find new and better ways to deliver public services in the 21st century. Although we publish this report at a time of unprecedented Government cuts in funding for local services, ours is not a cuts-driven agenda. I believe that if we do not make this change then the future of public services will be much more uncertain. The Co-operative Council draws inspiration from the values of fairness, accountability and responsibility that have driven progressive politics in this country for centuries. It is about putting the resources of the state at the disposal of citizens so that they can take control of the services they receive and the places where they live. More than just volunteering, it is about finding new ways in which citizens can participate in the decisions that affect their lives. The Co-operative Council is also not just about changing the council, it is about building more co-operative communities and realising that, for too long, the council has stood in the way rather than supported this development.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: List of Stakeholders That Responded to the ULEZ Consultation
    Appendix B (2) Appendix A: List of stakeholders that responded to the ULEZ consultation Air Quality Brentford Coulsdon & Purley Road User Alliance of British Drivers Forum Arriva Cross River Partnership Balfour Beatty Disabled Motoring UK Bambos Charalambous MP Federation of British Historic Barking and Dagenham and Vehicle Clubs Havering Green Party Federation of Small Businesses Barnet Green Party Forest Hill Society Better Streets for Enfield Freight Transport Association Bloomsbury Air Friends of the Earth Brentford Chamber of Gipsy Hill Green Party Commerce Greenpeace Brentford Community Council Greenwich Conservatives Brewery Logistics Group Heart of London Business British Heart Foundation Alliance British Lung Foundation Herne Hill Green Party British Motorcyclists Federation Hertfordshire County Council British Vehicle Rental and Hounslow and Brentford Leasing Association (BVRLA) Friends of the Earth Builders Merchants Federation Islington Green Party Campaign for Better Transport Joanne McCartney AM Campaign for Better Transport John Lewis Partnership (London Group) Kingston Environment Forum Campaign to Protect Rural Lambeth for a Cool Planet England Lambeth Green Party Caroline Pidgeon AM LEVC Caroline Russell AM Lewisham Cyclists Chartered Institute of Lewisham Liberal Democrats Environmental Health Licensed Taxi Drivers' Chiswick Liberal Democrats Association (LTDA) Church of England (Diocese of Living Streets Chelmsford) London Assembly Environment City of London Committee
    [Show full text]
  • Mutual and Co- Operative Approaches to Delivering Local
    Distribution by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk FIFTH REPOR Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 023474 T FROM THE COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE: SESSION 2012–13: HC 112 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 House of Commons The Houses of Parliament Shop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Communities and Local Telephone orders: 020 7219 3890 General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Government Committee Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.shop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 Mutual and co- This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/ operative approaches ISBN 978 0 215 05085 4 before to deliveringPY: form local CO 2012 any in services part, ADVANCE or December 6 Fifth Reportfull, of Session 2012–13 in Thursday EMBARGOED on publishedam be to 00.01 Not HC 112 EMBARGOEDADVANCECOPY: Nottobepublishedinfull,orpart,inanyformbefore 00.01amonThursday6December2012 House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee Mutual and co- operative approaches to delivering local services Fifth Report of Session 2012–13 Report,EMBARGOED together with formalADVANCE minutes,CO oralPY: and Nottowrittenbepublished evidence infull,orpart,inanyformbefore Ordered by00.01 the Houseam of CommonsonThursday 6December2012 to be printed 21 November 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Published on 6 December 2012 HC 112 £22.00 The Communities and Local Government Committee The Communities and Local Government Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Communities and Local Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List & Decisions
    Planning Weekly List & Decisions Appeals (Received/Determined) and Planning Applications & Notifications (Validated/Determined) Week Ending 26/04/2019 The attached list contains Planning and related applications being considered by the Council, acting as the Local Planning Authority. Details have been entered on the Statutory Register of Applications. Online application details and associated documents can be viewed via Public Access from the Lambeth Planning Internet site, https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/planning-and-building- control/planning-applications/search-planning-applications. A facility is also provided to comment on applications pending consideration. We recommend that you submit comments online. You will be automatically provided with a receipt for your correspondence, be able to track and monitor the progress of each application and, check the 21 day consultation deadline. Under the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985, any comments made are open to inspection by the public and in the event of an Appeal will be referred to the Planning Inspectorate. Confidential comments cannot be taken into account in determining an application. Application Descriptions The letters at the end of each reference indicate the type of application being considered. ADV = Advertisement Application P3J = Prior Approval Retail/Betting/Payday Loan to C3 CON = Conservation Area Consent P3N = Prior Approval Specified Sui Generis uses to C3 CLLB = Certificate of Lawfulness Listed Building P3O = Prior Approval Office to Residential DET = Approval
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 APPG Leasehold Letter
    Appendix 3 All Party Parliamentary Group on Leasehold and Commonhold Reform appg House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA www.leaseholdknowledge.com Co-Chairs: Sir Peter Bottomley MP, Justin Madders MP and Sir Edward Davey MP Contact: Katherine O’Riordan – [email protected] APPG Secretariat: Sebastian O’Kelly [email protected] Martin Boyd [email protected] Rt Hon Robert Jenrick MP Secretary of State Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government 2, Marsham Street London SW1P 4JA 8th January 2021 URGENTcladding319/PB/JM/ED/MHCLG/2021 Dear Secretary of State, APPG co-chairs Sir Peter Bottomley, Justin Madders with Sir Edward Davey attach signatures to this letter calling on Government to support leaseholders living in unsafe private residential leasehold properties who maybe facing substantial retrospective remedial safety-work costs. No leaseholder, lease-renter should suffer anxiety, facing costs well beyond the ability to pay. Replacing unsafe cladding on buildings may total £15 billion, nearly ten times the funds now available. You will be aware it is estimated that 1.5 million flats are currently un-mortgageable, trapping around 3.6 million people in potentially dangerous, unsellable housing. Government has responsibility and resources to rescue the living victims of the cladding costs scandal. Everyone seems to be at fault except those presently lumbered with impossible costs and with unsaleable flats in place of their dream homes. APPG co-chairs call on Government to accurately assess liability for building safety remediation costs which should not fall on the end-user, the leaseholder because of defective legislation. You will be aware two prime ministers, three former secretaries of state and successive housing ministers stated leaseholders should not pay to make their homes safe.
    [Show full text]